HIV+ Sex: The Psychological and Interpersonal Dynamics of HIV-Seropositive Gay and Bisexual Men's Relationships edited by Perry N. Halkitis, Cynthia A. Gomez, and Richard J. Wolitski. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005, pp. 272. In the United States, HIV/AIDS afflicts primarily men, mostly men of color and men who have sex with men (MSM). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that, among all those diagnosed with HIV since the start of the epidemic, more than 80% are men. Although the proportion of men living with HIV is decreasing, as recently as 2003 they accounted for 72% of those newly diagnosed. African-American and Latino men are disproportionately represented in these figures, and the largest transmission risk category remains MSM, accounting for 49% of all new cases in 2003. Advances in antiretroviral therapy have improved the health and prolonged the lives of men living with HIV, meaning the pursuit of sexual and romantic partners need not be abruptly interrupted by an HIV+ diagnosis or medical complications of the disease. Therefore, data are needed on ways to improve the psychological adaptation of HIV+ men, including the vitality of their Additionally, since up to one third of HIV+ individuals continue to have unprotected sex after seroconverting, research is needed to develop appropriate risk-reduction interventions for this group. Perfectly timed to address these needs is the volume HIV+ Sex: The Psychological and Interpersonal Dynamics of HIV-Seropositive Gay and Bisexual Men's Relationships, edited by three seasoned HIV researchers. Based on data from 250 qualitative interviews with HIV+ MSM from New York and San Francisco, conducted as part of the CDC-funded Seropositive Urban Men's Study, each of the book's 15 chapters explores the myriad factors related to sexual decision making. The study's original mission was to identify factors associated with serostatus disclosure and safer sex in order to identify potential cognitive, behavioral, and emotional targets for prevention interventions. The goal of addressing the health of gay and bisexual men's relationships, however, was not specifically outlined in the original study and is not emphasized in this volume. Indeed, the title is somewhat misleading since its last word should probably be sexualities and not relationships. The lack of focus on relationship initiation and development and on relationships as a context for the expression of sexuality is unfortunate given the book's frequent descriptions of men engaging in sex as a maladaptive or ineffective effort to cope with emotional pain. …
Read full abstract