History Of Uveitis Research Articles

Uveitis as a Predictor for Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Behçet's Disease, Multi Centric Cohort Study from Aseer Region, Saudi Arabia

Introduction: Behçet's disease (BD) is a chronic, multisystem inflammatory disorder characterized by a diverse array of clinical manifestations, including recurrent oral and genital ulcers, ocular inflammation, skin lesions, and joint problems. Its presentation varies, requiring tailored diagnosis and management. Methods: Retrospective cohort study, though review of medical charts and data for patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for BD actively receiving care in rheumatology clinics. The primary objective was to investigate the correlation between uveitis and Myocardial infarction in this population. Results: This study included a total of 111 patients. Approximately 33% of the patients exhibited positive CRP levels. Approximately 10% (11 patients) of the subjects were diagnosed with uveitis. Notably, the majority of individuals with uveitis were males. Three patients with uveitis had arthritis, none of whom presented with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) Complaints. Remarkably, none of the patients diagnosed with uveitis had a documented history of myocardial infarction (MI). Conclusion: In our cohort, those with a history of MI did not have a documented history of uveitis. Larger, prospective studies are needed to evaluate the associations between MI and uveitis in a BD population.

Prevalence and incidence of uveitis in patients with spondyloarthritis: the impact of the biologics era. Data from International ASAS-COMOSPA Study.

Uveitis is a common extra-musculoskeletal manifestation in Spondyloarthritis (SpA). The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of uveitis in SpA patients, its association with geographical areas and to determine whether its incidence was different before and after the biological era. ASAS-COMOSPA is a retrospective study that includes patients fulfilling ASAS SpA classification criteria from 22 countries. The overall prevalence of uveitis was calculated, and factors associated with the onset of a first episode of uveitis were evaluated using a Cox regression. A Log-Rank test was performed to compare the new onset of uveitis in the no biological era (SpA onset before 2000) vs biological era (SpA onset after 2000). 3984 patients were included. The likelihood of presenting a first uveitis episode increased over time, from a prevalence of 10.5% (95%CI 9.5%-11.4%) at the time of the SpA diagnosis to 46.6% (41.6%-51.5%) after 30 years since the SpA diagnosis. HLA-B27 positivity, family history of uveitis, peripheral enthesitis and IBD were associated with higher risk of uveitis. Patients with SpA disease onset after year 2000 showed a lower prevalence of uveitis compared with disease onset before year 2000 (8.2% vs 25.5%, p< 0.01), as well as a lower incidence (2.8 per 100 PY vs 6.1 per 100 PY, respectively). In our study the risk of having suffered from at least one episode of uveitis ranged from 10% at the time of the diagnosis of axSpA to 47% after 30 years of disease duration. Patients with disease onset after biologic therapy introduction showed a significantly lower prevalence and incidence of first episodes of uveitis.

Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials

ObjectivesAcute anterior uveitis (‘uveitis’) is a common axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) extramusculoskeletal manifestation. Interleukin (IL)-17 is implicated in its pathogenesis, however, there is conflicting evidence for IL-17A inhibition in uveitis management....

Course of Uveitis in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis during the Interleukin17 Inhibitors Therapy.

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) can have different effects on various clinical manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data on the effects of interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL17-i) on uveitis in AS continue to accumulate. Objective: to evaluate the effect of IL17-i therapy on the course of uveitis in AS. The study involved 73 patients with AS (New York criteria, 1984), who received IL17-i (57-secukinumab (SEC), 22-netakimab (NTK)) for at least 1 year. The average age of patients at the time of inclusion in the study was 41.93 ± 8.95 years, the average duration of AS was 10.75 ± 6.22 years. There were 40 men (56.7%) and 33 women (43.3%) among the patients. HLA-B27 was detected in 62/73 (85%), coxitis in 58 (79%), enthesitis in 63 (86.3%), peripheral arthritis in 57 (78%), psoriasis in 7 (9.5%), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in 3 (4.1%) patients; in 6 (8.2%) patients, the disease started before the age of 16; 19 (26%) patients had at least one episode of uveitis during the course of the disease. The rates of uveitis was estimated by comparing the number of incidences per 100 patient-years before the start of bDMARDs therapy and during IL17-i using. The incidence rate of uveitis before the start of bDMARDs therapy for all patients was 8.3 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.065-0.107), during IL17-i therapy- 9.2 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.06-0.15), p = 0.72. The incidence rate of uveitis among patients who used SEC was 10.1 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.079-0.13) before the start of bDMARDs therapy and 9.4 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.05-0.15), p = 0.74 during SEC therapy. The incidence rate of uveitis among patients who used NTK was 4.8 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.028-0.08) before the start of bDMARDs therapy and 7.1 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.019-022), p= 0.3 during the NTK therapy. For patients with a history of uveitis, the incidence rate of uveitis was 22.5 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.18-0.28) before the start of therapy with bDMARDs and 29.1 per 100 pt-years (95% CI 0.18-0.43), p = 0.29 during IL17-i therapy. Occurrences of uveitis were observed in 4 of 57 patients (7%) during SEC therapy and in 1 of 25 (4%) patients during the NTK therapy. One case of new-onset uveitis was recorded during the using of SEC. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of uveitis during IL17-i therapy compared with non-biological therapy. IL17-i therapy have not demonstrated a significant effect on the course of uveitis in AS in the study group.

Risk of Post-COVID-19 Uveitis and Risk Modification by Vaccination: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of uveitis, one of the most common ocular manifestations of COVID-19, in individuals with a history of uveitis and COVID-19 infection while discriminating the effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccinations. We analyzed nationwide data from 235,228 individuals with a history of uveitis prior to COVID-19 infection and evaluated incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) of post-COVID-19 uveitis for different post-infection periods, including early- (within 30 days) and delayed-onset ones. The cumulative incidences of post-infection uveitis at 3, 6, and 12 months were calculated as 8.5%, 11.8%, and 14.0%, respectively. The HR of post-COVID-19 uveitis was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.37) and was particularly higher in the early-onset period (1.42, 95% CI: 1.24-1.61). Vaccinated individuals showed a modestly elevated risk of uveitis relative to pre-infection, while unvaccinated ones exhibited substantially higher risks in the early-onset period: the HR of post-infection uveitis before vaccination was 3.61 (95% CI: 1.35-9.66), whereas after vaccination, it was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05-1.39). COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher risk of uveitis, which was mitigated by vaccination. Vigilance in the monitoring of uveitis is warranted for recently COVID-19-infected individuals with a history of uveitis, particularly unvaccinated individuals.

Differences between radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients in a Mexican cohort

To compare the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics, disease onset, and clinical features of radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients. All patients who attended outpatient spondylarthritis (SpA) clinics at Hospital General de Mexico and the Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición from 1998 to 2005 and met the rheumatologist diagnostic criteria for SpA were selected. Then the SpA patients were classified by European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria (ESSG). We selected SpA patients with axial presentation as axial SpA (axSpA), and they were classified as r-axSpA if they met modified New York (mNY) criteria for sacroiliitis and as nr-axSpA if they did not meet mNY criteria; to compared clinical, demographic, and laboratory test between the subgroups. It included 148 SpA patients; 55 (37.2%) patients had r-axSpA, and 70 (47.3%) had nr-axSpA. The nr-axSpA patients had a lower proportion of males (58.6% vs 78.2%, P < 0.05), lower HLA-B27 frequency (54.3%. vs. 92.7%, P < 0.05), were older at disease onset (21 vs 16 years; P < 0.01) and had a higher frequency of infections at disease onset (9.1% vs 32.9, P < 0.05) than r-axSpA. BASFI (2.9 vs 4.8; P < 0.0001), Dougados functional index (7 vs. 14; P < 0.05), and BASDAI (4.1 vs. 5.2; P < 0.001) were lower in patients with nr-axSpA than r-axSpA, respectively. The factors that most influenced the presentation of r-axSpA were history of uveitis (OR 14, 95% CI 2.3–85), HLA-B27 (OR 7.97, 95% CI, 2.96–122), male sex (OR 6.16, 95% CI, 1.47–25.7), axial enthesopathy count (OR 1.17 95% CI, 1.03–1.33). This study provides insight into the differences between nr-axSpA and r-axSpA in Mexico. Patients with r-axSpA were mainly male, with a younger presentation age, a higher prevalence of HLA-B27, more history of uveitis, fewer episodes of dactylitis, more axial enthesopathy, and higher disease activity than nr-axSpA.

New-onset or relapse of uveitis after rapid spreading of COVID-19 infection in China and risk factor analysis for relapse

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to report the clinical profile of new-onset and relapse of uveitis following rapid spreading of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection due to change of anti-COVID-19 policies in China and investigate potential risk factors for inflammation relapse.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, patients with new-onset or a history of uveitis between December 23, 2022, and February 28, 2023, were included to assess the influence of COVID-19 infection on uveitis. Detailed information on demographic data, clinical characteristics, treatment measures, treatment response, and ocular inflammatory status before and after COVID-19 infection was collected.ResultsThis study included 349 patients with a history of uveitis. The uveitis relapse rate was higher (28.8%, n = 288) in those with COVID-19 infection than in patients without COVID-19 infection (14.8%, n = 61) (P = 0.024). Among the relapse cases, 50.8% experienced a relapse of anterior uveitis, while 49.2% had a relapse of uveitis involving the posterior segment. Multivariable regression analysis indicated a positive correlation between disease duration and uveitis relapse, while the last relapse exceeding one year before COVID-19 infection and the use of methotrexate during COVID-19 infection were negatively correlated with relapse of uveitis. Thirteen patients who developed new-onset uveitis following COVID-19 infection were included; among them, three (23.1%) had anterior uveitis and 10 (76.9%) had uveitis affecting the posterior segment. Regarding cases involving the posterior segment, four patients (30.8%) were diagnosed with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.ConclusionsCOVID-19 infection increases the rate of uveitis relapse. Long disease duration is a risk factor, while time since the last relapse more than 1 year and methotrexate use are protective factors against uveitis relapse.

COVID-19 Vaccine–Associated Uveitis in Patients With a History of Uveitis

Understanding the potential risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with a history of uveitis is crucial for vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring. To investigate the risk of uveitis recurrence after COVID-19 vaccination in a cohort of individuals with a history of uveitis. This retrospective population-based cohort study included individuals diagnosed with uveitis between January 1, 2015, and February 25, 2021, in South Korea. After excluding individuals without COVID-19 vaccination or with SARS-CoV-2 infection, individuals with a history of uveitis who had received at least 1 dose of a messenger RNA (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) or adenovirus vector-based (ChAdOx1 [AstraZeneca] or Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen]) COVID-19 vaccine were included. Data were analyzed from February 26, 2021, to December 31, 2022. Demographic and clinical data, along with vaccination details, were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service and Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency databases. Outcomes of interest were incidence and risk of postvaccination uveitis in association with different COVID-19 vaccines and periods before and after COVID-19 vaccination. Uveitis was categorized by onset (early, within 30 days, or delayed) and type (anterior or nonanterior). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, stratified according to vaccine type and vaccination period. Of 543 737 individuals with history of uveitis, 473 934 individuals (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [17.4] years; 243 127 [51.3] female) had documented COVID-19 vaccination and were included in analysis. The cumulative incidence of postvaccination uveitis was 8.6% at 3 months, 12.5% at 6 months, and 16.8% at 1 year, predominantly of the anterior type. Variations in the risk of postvaccination uveitis were observed across different vaccines and intervaccination periods. The risk of early postvaccination uveitis was increased for individuals receiving the BNT162b2 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.52-1.86), mRNA-1273 (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.21-1.89), ChAdOx1 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.43-1.79), and Ad26.COV2.S (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.40-3.07) vaccines. The risk of uveitis was higher particularly between the first and second vaccination doses (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.55-1.73). These findings suggest that there was an elevated risk of uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination, with the vaccine type and period mediating this risk. For individuals with a history of uveitis, clinicians should consider the potential risk of uveitis recurrence in vaccination strategies and clinical monitoring.

P163 Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials

Abstract Background/Aims Acute anterior uveitis (‘uveitis’) is a common extra musculoskeletal manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Interleukin (IL)-17 has been implicated in uveitis pathogenesis; however, inhibition of IL-17A alone may not be optimal for uveitis management. We report the incidence of uveitis following IL-17A and IL17F inhibition with bimekizumab (BKZ) in patients with axSpA. Methods Data were pooled for patients randomised to placebo (PBO) or BKZ 160mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of the phase (ph)3 studies BE MOBILE 1 (NCT03928704; non-radiographic axSpA) and 2 (NCT03928743; radiographic axSpA [i.e. ankylosing spondylitis]). Data were also pooled for all patients treated with BKZ in BE MOBILE 1, BE MOBILE 2, BE MOVING (NCT04436640; open-label extension [OLE] of BE MOBILE 1 and 2), the ph2b study BE AGILE (NCT02963506; r-axSpA) and its OLE BE AGILE 2 (NCT03355573; data cut-off 4 July 2022). Uveitis events were identified using the preferred terms “autoimmune uveitis,” “iridocyclitis,” “iritis” and “uveitis,” and are reported as exposure adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) for all patients who received ≥1 BKZ dose. Results Baseline characteristics of the axSpA study populations are shown in the Table. In the DBTP of BE MOBILE 1 and 2, uveitis events occurred in 11/237 (4.6%; EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 15.4 [7.7, 27.5]) and 2/349 (0.6%; 1.8 [0.2, 6.7]) patients randomised to PBO and BKZ (percentage difference [95% CI]: 4.1 [1.7, 7.6]), respectively. In 45 PBO-randomised (19.0%) and 52 BKZ-randomised (14.9%) patients with history of uveitis, uveitis occurred in 20.0% (EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 70.4 [32.2, 133.7]) and 1.9% (6.2 [0.2, 34.8]) of patients, respectively. In the ph2b/3 pool (N = 848) total BKZ exposure was 2,034.4 PY and 130 (15.3%) patients had history of uveitis. Uveitis occurred in 25 (2.9%; EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.8, 1.8]) and 14 (10.8%; 4.6 [2.5, 7.7]) patients overall and with history of uveitis, respectively. All uveitis events were mild/moderate; one led to discontinuation. Conclusion Incidence of uveitis was lower to Week 16 in patients with axSpA randomised to BKZ 160mg Q4W versus PBO and remained low at 1.2/100 PY in the largest ph2b/3 pool. Disclosure M. Rudwaleit: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. M.A. Brown: Consultancies; Clementia, Grey Wolf Therapeutics, Incyte, Ipsen, Pfizer, Regeneron and Xinthera. Member of speakers’ bureau; Novartis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; UCB Pharma. F. van Gaalen: Grants/research support; Jacobus Stichting, Novartis, Stichting ASAS, Stichting Vrienden van Sole Mio and UCB Pharma. Other; fees from Novartis; personal fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly and MSD. N. Haroon: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. L.S. Gensler: Consultancies; AbbVie, Acelyrin, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Novartis and UCB Pharma paid to institution. C. Fleurinck: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. A. Marten: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. U. Massow: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. N. de Peyrecave: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. T. Vaux: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. K. White: Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB Pharma. Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. D. McGonagle: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Honoraria; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck and Pfizer. I. van der Horst-Bruinsma: Consultancies; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis and UCB Pharma. Other; unrestricted grants received for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; fees received for lectures from AbbVie, BMS, MSD and Pfizer.

OA12 Patient reported pregnancy outcomes and experiences in women with axial spondyloarthritis: preliminary results from a UK patient survey

Abstract Background/Aims Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) affects women of childbearing age and is associated with increased prevalence of pregnancy complications. There are limited UK data published on women with axSpA and pregnancy. We aimed to analyse the pregnancy outcomes and perspectives from women in the UK with axSpA who have been pregnant, with a particular focus on their access to support, flares, medication, and pregnancy complications. Methods An online patient survey was launched using RedCAP for women in the UK with axSpA who are or have been pregnant. The survey including 5 parts for details on: 1) general information and axSpA; 2) maternal; 3) pre-pregnancy; 4) pregnancy; 5) postpartum. The project was approved by UCL Research and Ethics Committee and endorsed by NASS and BRITSpA. Patients were recruited through the NASS and BRITSpA websites, social media platforms and e-mail. The survey collected anonymous data from February to June 2023. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Stata17. Results Among the 172 respondents, 89% were white, mean age was 44 years, 74% were HLA-B27 positive and 35%, 22% and 17% self-reported a history of uveitis, skin psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease, respectively. This abstract focuses on data from the first pregnancy after axSpA diagnosis (n = 60, 35% of respondents). Not all questions were answered by participants and data are reported as a percentage of questions answered. Overall, 42% (20/40) reported a flare during their first pregnancy, of which 30% (6/20) contacted their obstetrician, 45% (9/20) contacted rheumatology and 40% (8/20) self-managed. 92% (52/60) of respondents say they planned pregnancy but only 32 (57%) had discussed pregnancy plans with rheumatology and only 26% were seen in a combined obstetric-rheumatology clinic. Regarding medications, 48% (24/50) felt comfortable with their medication regime during pregnancy, 55% stopped their biologic during pregnancy, and 3% started on a biologic. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, 45% had a natural delivery and 54% had caesarean section. 80% (48/60) of first pregnancies resulted in live birth and 16% (7/44) of respondents reported birth defects. Pregnancy complications were reported in 23% (11/48), of which 45% had pre-eclampsia (5/11), 27% had diabetes, 9% had eclampsia and, overall, 19% (9/47) had a self-reported infection. Regarding postpartum, 54% (25/46) had a flare after first delivery; average time to flare post-delivery was 5.4 weeks. Conclusion Preliminary results from UK-based patient survey provides essential insights into self-reported issues of women with axSpA and pregnancy. The study highlights the need for improvement in pre-pregnancy counselling and access, the increased risk of flares during pregnancy, and complications such as pre-eclampsia. Limitations include recall bias as it was a retrospective survey, being unable to clarify respondents' understanding, self-reported outcomes, and incomplete data capturing. Full analyses of the further pregnancies is planned. Disclosure A. Mootoo: None. M. Mouyis: Other; Speaking and advisory fees from UCB and Galapagos. B. Farisogullari: None. P.M. Machado: Consultancies; Consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. D. Webb: None. J. Hamilton: None. Z. Clark: None. H. Marzo-Ortega: Honoraria; AbbVie, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis and UCB.

Enhancing Ophthalmic Triage: identification of new clinical features to support healthcare professionals in triage.

To investigate which features from a patient's history are either high or low risk that could support healthcare professionals in ophthalmic emergency triage. Prospective, 12,584 visits from 11,733 adult patients attending an Accident and Emergency department at a single tertiary centre were analysed. Data were collected by ophthalmic nurses working in triage, using an online form from August 2021 to April 2022. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was conducted to identify which features from the patients' history would be associated with emergency care. This study found that 45.5% (5731 patient visits (PV)) required a same day eye emergency examination (SDEE), 11.3% (1416 PV) needed urgent care, and 43.2% (5437 PV) were appropriate for elective consultations with a GP or optometrist. The MVA top ten features that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) that would warrant SDEE with odds ratio (95% CI) were: bilateral eye injury 36.5 [15.6-85.5], unilateral eye injury 25.8 [20.9-31.7], vision loss 4.8 [2.9-7.8], post-operative ophthalmic ( < 4 weeks) 4.6 [3.8-5.7], contact lens wearer 3.9 [3.3-4.7], history of uveitis 3.9 [3.3-4.7], photophobia 2.9 [2.4-3.6], unilateral dark shadow/curtain in vision 2.4 [1.8-3.0], unilateral injected red eye 2.0 [1.8-2.2] and rapid change in visual acuity 1.8 [1.5-2.2]. This study characterises presenting features covering almost 100 ophthalmic acute presentations that are commonly seen in emergency and elective care. This information could supplement current red flag indicators and support healthcare professionals in ophthalmic triage. Further research is required to evaluate the cost effectivity and safety of our findings for triaging acute presentations.

Uveitis Risk After the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccination Based on Uveitis History: Matched Cohort and Crossover Case Series Study

To investigate the risk of noninfectious uveitis following the first dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination based on the uveitis history. Retrospective matched cohort and crossover case series study. A random sample of 7 917 457 individuals who received COVID-19 vaccine between January 2021 and March 2022 in Korea, and had no recorded history of COVID-19 were categorized into the control and uveitis groups based on their uveitis history. After performing 3:1 propensity score matching, we assessed the cumulative incidence and risk of noninfectious uveitis in the 180 days after COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, we performed a crossover case series analysis to compare the pre- and postvaccination incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of uveitis in individuals with and without a history of uveitis. In the matched cohort analysis, uveitis group had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of uveitis (15.4%) than control group (0.10%). The uveitis group exhibited increased risks of all uveitis types, anterior, and nonanterior uveitis in the first 60 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 169, 158, and 253, respectively) and in days 61 to 180 (HR: 166, 164, and 143, respectively) after vaccination. In the crossover case series analysis, uveitis occurred with relatively equal frequency in 20-day intervals during the 180 days before and after vaccination, regardless of uveitis history. For uveitis group, the adjusted IRRs for early and late postvaccination events were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.96) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.85), respectively. COVID-19 vaccination did not increase the risk of uveitis, regardless of uveitis history.

Comparison of Incidence or Recurrence of Anterior Uveitis in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Background: Anterior uveitis (AU) is a significant concern in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and the choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as a treatment modality raises questions regarding its effects on AU. We compared the effects of TNFi on AU in patients with AS. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AS and treated with at least one TNFi, including anti-TNFα antibodies (adalimumab and infliximab) or a soluble TNF receptor molecule (etanercept), between January 2010 and December 2022, were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the recurrence rate of AU in patients with a history of uveitis and the incidence of new-onset AU in those without a history of uveitis among the three TNFi groups. We also compared the effects of two different TNFi agents in patients who underwent TNFi switching. Results: Within two years of treatment initiation, there was no significant difference in AU recurrence among the three TNFi groups. However, the incidence of new-onset AU was significantly higher in the etanercept group than in the adalimumab group (26.4% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.024). After two years, the AU recurrence rate was significantly lower in the adalimumab group than in the other groups (p &lt; 0.001). Among patients who underwent anti-TNFi switching, adalimumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of uveitis than etanercept (p = 0.023). Conclusion: In the short-term period following TNFi therapy, etanercept induced new-onset AU more frequently than adalimumab in patients with AS. Adalimumab recipients experienced fewer AU recurrences during the subsequent long-term period compared to other TNFi recipients.

Screening for juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis with laser flare photometry in the pediatric rheumatology office: a prospective observational study

BackgroundJuvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) Associated Uveitis (JIA-U) remains one of the most serious complications of JIA in children. Historically, pediatric JIA is diagnosed by an Optometrist or Ophthalmologist; however, barriers to scheduling increase wait times that may delay diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate laser flare photometry (LFP) use to diagnose JIA-U in the Pediatric Rheumatology clinic for patients with JIA.MethodsThis prospective, observational study assessed pediatric patients diagnosed with JIA without a previous history of uveitis between January 2020 and September 2022. All patients underwent at least one evaluation of both eyes using a Kowa FM-600 laser flare photometer during a routine Rheumatology appointment, as well as a standard slit lamp examination (SLE) by optometry or ophthalmology during routine clinical care. Data collected at patient visits included demographics, JIA characteristics, treatment, LFP readings, and anterior chamber (AC) cell grade score utilizing the SUN grading system. Data were summarized using descriptive analyses and the uveitis false positive rate was calculated.ResultsThe study cohort included 58 pediatric patients diagnosed with JIA. The mean age was 8.4 years (1.2–16.3 years) at diagnosis and 11.9 (4.8–16.5 years) at enrollment. The mean duration of disease at time of enrollment was 42 months (range; 0-157 months). Participants were predominantly female (n = 43, 74.1%) and white/Caucasian race (n = 37, 63.8%). The most common JIA subtypes included persistent oligoarticular JIA (n = 19, 32.8%), and RF negative polyarticular JIA (n = 12, 20.7%). There were 12 ANA positive patients (20.7%). At enrollment, 16 patients (27.6%) were not on medications, with 20 (34.5%) on methotrexate, 20 (34.5%) on adalimumab, 6 (10.3%) on tocilizumab, and 5 (8.6%) on etanercept. During the study period, no eye exams detected active uveitis based on SLE with a SUN grade over 0. However, of the 135 LFP readings, 131 (97.0%) were normal, yielding a false positive rate of 3% (95% CI: 0.8%, 7.4%).ConclusionsLFP is a non-invasive tool that can be utilized in the pediatric rheumatology clinic to evaluate for JIA-U. There is a low false positive rate of LFP when compared with standard slit lamp exam.

Reduced expression of miRNAs as potential biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis.

This study aimed to investigate the value of miR-29a-3p, miR-27a, miR126-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-625-3p, miR-130a, miR-32, miR-218, miR-131, and miR5196 in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis and to determine whether there is a difference in miRNA expression levels between radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, as well as the relationship between miRNA expression levels, disease activity, and uveitis history. This study included 50 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (25 with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and 25 with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis) and 25 healthy individuals. The fold change of miRNA expression for each miRNA was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. The expression of all miRNAs except miR-130a was downregulated in axial spondyloarthritis patients (miR-27a: fold regulation: -11.21, p<0.001; miR-29a-3p: fold regulation: -2.63, p<0.001; miR-32: fold regulation: -2.94, p=0.002; miR-126-3p: fold regulation -10.94, p<0.001; miR-132: fold regulation: -2.18, p<0.001; miR-146-5p: fold regulation: -9.78, p<0.001; miR-218: fold regulation: -2.65, p<0.001; miR-625-3p: fold regulation: -2.01, p=0.001; miR-5196-3p: fold regulation: -7.04, p<0.001). The expression levels of these miRNAs did not differ significantly between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients (p>0.05 for all). Particularly, miR-27a, miR-126-3p, miR-146-5p, and miR-5196-3p were found to be substantially downregulated in both non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients, suggesting their potential as diagnostic biomarkers for axial spondyloarthritis.

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 2315 eyes over a six-year period

Background: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a form of retinal detachment caused by passage of fluid from the vitreous cavity into the space between the neurosensory retina and the retinal pigment epithelium via a retinal break or full-thickness defect. At our tertiary referral center, we evaluated the clinical and epidemiological features of RRD, and we herein report the frequency of related risk factors.&#x0D; Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the records of patients with a final diagnosis of RRD at an academic ophthalmological referral center in Isfahan, Iran, over a six-year period. We retrieved and reviewed data from the medical records of all eligible participants, including sex, age, laterality, lens status, macular status, type of RRD, location and number of breaks, type of surgery, rate of re-operation during the first year after initial surgery, and documented clinical risk factors for RRD. Clinical risk factors were categorized as the presence of myopic refractive error, ocular trauma, history of cataract surgery, history of other ocular surgeries, history of uveitis, or undetermined.&#x0D; Results: We included 2315 eyes of 2229 patients with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 51.1 (16.9) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1.8:1. The most common quadrants containing retinal breaks were the superotemporal quadrant (34.1%), inferotemporal quadrant (23.4%), and superonasal quadrant (10.7%). Macula-involved RRD was seen in 90% of eyes (n=2083 eyes). The most frequently identified risk factors were cataract surgery (32.9%) and myopia (22.3%) in adults, and myopia (35.0%) and ocular trauma (27.4%) in the pediatric group. Most eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy (51.3%), whereas pneumatic retinopexy (0.7%) was the least commonly selected.&#x0D; Conclusions: Our results indicate that cataract surgery and myopia are the most common risk factors for RRD in adults. Myopia and ocular trauma are the most common risk factors in pediatric patients. As observed in many studies, the characteristics of the study population, including middle age, male sex, myopia, and ocular trauma, may be associated with RRD at different rates. Further population-based longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are required to verify these preliminary observations.

Clinical Profile of Cystoid Macular Edema Following Small Incision Cataract Surgery

BACKGROUND&#x0D; This study was conducted to determine the incidence of cystoid macular edema after small incision cataract surgery by means of OCT, study the clinical profile and compare the incidence in non-diabetic and diabetic patients with and without retinopathy.&#x0D; METHODS&#x0D; This was a hospital based prospective study, conducted among 325 patients in the age group of 40 to 85 years who underwent Small Incision Cataract Surgery [SICS] conducted in Sree Mookambika Institute of Medical Sciences, Kulasekharam, Kanyakumary District, Tamil Nadu, over a period of one year from January 2022 to December 2023, after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee and written informed consent from the study participants.&#x0D; RESULTS&#x0D; The incidence of CME was higher among diabetic patients when compared with non-diabetic patients and was statistically significant. Patients with a history of uveitis had a statistically significant increase (p&lt;0.05) in the incidence of CME in the 6th postoperative week. Patients with complicated surgery with iris prolapse, vitreous prolapse, difficult nucleus delivery and posterior capsular rent had an increased incidence of CME. This was statistically significant (p&lt;0.05) during all three postoperative evaluations.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS&#x0D; Following cataract surgery, 18.8% of patients developed cystoid macular edema six weeks after the procedure. Three months following surgery, 13.2% had CME, which further declined to 5.2% at six months after surgery. The incidence of clinically significant cystoid macular edema was 4% at six weeks after surgery. It further declined to 1.2% at 3 months after surgery and was present in only 0.6% at 6 months after surgery. The incidence of CME was higher among the diabetic patients throughout the study when compared with non-diabetic patients and was statistically significant (p&lt;0.01). The association between the severity of diabetic retinopathy and the incidence of cystoid macular edema was not statistically significant. Patients with a history of uveitis had a statistically significant increase (p&lt;0.05) in the incidence of CME in the 6th postoperative week. Patients with complicated surgery with iris prolapse, vitreous prolapse, difficult nucleus delivery and posterior capsular rent had an increased incidence of CME. Patients not using topical NSAIDS were found to have an increased incidence of CME.

Course of uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis during the interleukin 17 inhibitors therapy

Background. Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) can have different effects on various clinical manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data on the effects of interleukin 17 inhibitors (iIL17) on uveitis in AS continue to accumulate. Objective – to evaluate the effect of iIL17 therapy on the course of uveitis in AS. Material and methods. 73 patients (pts) with AS (New York criteria, 1984), who received iIL17 (57 – secukinumab (SEC), 22 – netakimab (NTK)) for at least 1 year were included in the study. The average age of pts at the time of inclusion in the study was 41.93±8.95 years, the average duration of AS was 10.75±6.22 years. There were 40 (56.7%) men and 33 (43.3%) women among the pts. HLA-B27 was detected in 62/73 (85%), coxitis in 58 (79%), enthesitis in 63 (86.3%), peripheral arthritis in 57 (78%), psoriasis in 7 (9.5%), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in 3 (4.1%); in 6 (8.2%) the disease started before the age of 16; 19 (26%) pts had at least 1 episode of uveitis during the course of the disease. The rates of uveitis was estimated by comparing the number of incidences per 100 patient-years before the start of bDMARDs therapy and during iIL17 using. Result. The incidence rate of uveitis before the start of bDMARDs therapy for all pts was 8.3 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.065–0.107), during iIL17 therapy – 9.2 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.06–0.15; p=0.72). The incidence rate of uveitis among pts used SEC was 10.1 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 0.079–0.13) before the start of bDMARDs therapy, during SEC using – 9.4 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.05–0.15; p=0.74). The incidence rate of uveitis among pts used NTK was 4.8 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.028–0.08) before the start of bDMARDs therapy, during the NTK using – 7.1 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.019–0,22; p=0.3). For patients with a history of uveitis, the incidence rate of uveitis before the start of therapy with bDMARDs was 22.5 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.18–0.28), during iIL17 therapy – 29.1 per 100 pt-years (95% CI: 0.18–0.43; p=0.29). Occurrences of uveitis were observed in 4 of 57 pts (7%) during the using of SEC, and in 1 of 25 pts (4%) – during the NTK therapy. 1 case of new-onset uveitis was recorded during the using of SEC. Conclusion. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of uveitis during iIL17 using compared with non-biological therapy. iIL17 have not demonstrated a significant effect on the course of uveitis in AS in the study group.

Transient band keratopathy associated with epithelial ingrowth treated with antimetabolites

Introduction: To report a case of visually significant band keratopathy associated with ocular inflammation in the setting of epithelial ingrowth, both of which resolved after repeated antimetabolite treatments. Patient and Clinical Findings: A 74-year-old woman with a history of uveitis–glaucoma–hyphema syndrome after complicated cataract surgery presented with epithelial ingrowth in the right eye and diffuse central band keratopathy after posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) removal and pars plana vitrectomy and anterior chamber IOL placement. Diagnosis, Intervention, and Outcomes: After multiple intraocular injections of antimetabolites, the epithelial ingrowth and visually significant band keratopathy resolved. Conclusions: Treating the underlying source of inflammation, such as epithelial ingrowth with antimetabolites, was associated with clearance of the band keratopathy without further intervention.

OA03 Trauma secondary to a horse riding accident as a potential accelerating factor in inflammatory axial sponyloarthropathy: a case report and literature review

Abstract Introduction Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease characterised by axial involvement and sacroiliitis. The etiology of AS remains elusive, with genetic and environmental factors implicated in disease development and progression. This case report aims to investigate the potential association between trauma and the acceleration of AS in individuals positive for HLA-B27. Furthermore one purpose of this case-report is to ascertain any link between horse riding accidents in jockeys or professionals undertaking horse riding as a career choice. Is there a correlation between trauma and development of inflammatory axial spondyloarthropathy subsequently or not. Case description A 24-year-old female patient with a medical history of eczema and Graves' disease, currently undergoing propylthiouracil treatment, was referred to the rheumatology clinic due to persistent back pain for the past six to seven years following a horse riding accident. The patient had previously received physiotherapy and found relief with naproxen and co-codamol. The pain primarily affects her lower spine and radiates down her legs. While movement provides some relief, lying down exacerbates the pain. The patient experiences stiffness for approximately 30 minutes in the morning but does not exhibit peripheral joint symptoms. Exercise helps alleviate her symptoms. The patient reported a family history of psoriasis but denied any history of uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, weight loss, night sweats, heartblock or achilles tendinitis. She also gave a history of joint hyper mobility with reduced flexion at the spine over the years. Blood tests revealed normal levels of ANA, CCP, ESR, rheumatoid factor, B12, HbA1c, and thyroid function. Ferritin levels were 30.2, and HLA B27 was positive. Joint examination did not reveal any signs of synovitis. The patient exhibited good range of motion in the spine. SLR's were positive on both sides and no tenderness over spine or sacroiliac joints. Systemic Examination was normal. BASDAI score was 4. Occiput to wall distance of 0 centimeters. Beighton score 4/9. Subsequently MRI whole spine/SI Joints were organised and results indicated a central disc protrusion at the L4-L5 level leading to critical spinal stenosis and likely impinging on the transitioning L5 and S1 nerve roots. Additionally, a disc protrusion at the L5-S1 which was impinging on the left S1 nerve root. Bilateral sacroiliitis was also observed. Patient was treated with NSAIDs and physiotherapy with good results with a view for a subsequent MRI, and escalation to biologics if symptoms were to worsen. Discussion The presented case raises the question of whether trauma accelerates the progression of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in individuals who are positive for HLA-B27. Although this specific case involves a 24-year-old female patient with a history of back pain following a horse riding accident, additional research and studies would be required to draw definitive conclusions regarding the relationship between trauma and the development or acceleration of AS in HLA-B27 positive individuals. The question this case report poses and there is little in terms of research and case reports present, whether the involvement of the lady in question in a horse riding accident unmasked her ankylosing spondylitis given her HLA B27 positivity and the presence of sacroilitis on MRI scans. Literature review revealed a potential role of trauma accelerating the progression of ankylosing spondylitis in individuals who are also positive for HLA B-27, in addition in some cases it lead to detection and unmasking of chronic back pain which was inflammatory in nature rather than mechanical or a combination of both. This was revealed by the horse riding accident given the nature of the pain which had been constant and worsening which lead to a suspicion of a possible inflammatory component and hence further investigations were done. In conclusion this case report highlights the importance of a possible correlation between AS in HLA B27 positive individuals and raises the question whether trauma secondary to sports injuries like horseback riding accidents in our patients case, accelerates the progression of AS in individuals who are positive for HLA-B27. Key learning points This case report highlights the potential role of trauma following a sports injury as a contributing factor in the acceleration of AS in individuals positive for HLA-B27. Further investigations, including prospective studies, are warranted to elucidate the complex interplay between trauma, genetic predisposition, and disease progression in AS. The purpose of this case report is to remind sports medicine physicians of the prevalence of rheumatologic diseases in general and ankylosing spondylitis in particular and of the various ways in which spondyloarthropathies may present in athletes/sports personnel. Increased suspicion may lead to earlier diagnosis and treatment, potentially reducing illness severity and duration and improving the performance of athletes with this condition.