Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction This study aimed to assess systolic and diastolic heart function changes in patients with history of aortic coarctation using advanced echocardiographic imaging. Additionally, we sought to analyse which severity factors influenced these changes. Methods We performed a complete echocardiographic evaluation, with advanced functional analysis, including myocardial work analysis, to a random sample of 53 patients (age 12 to 40 years). These had a previous history of coarctation of the aorta (CoAo), which was either corrected (aortic transisthmic Doppler gradient (Dgrad) ≤20mmHg) or presented a significant residual gradient (Dgrad >20mmHg). A control group of healthy individuals, matched for age, sex and BMI, was subjected to the same evaluation. Selected dependent variables were: E/A, E’, E/E’, atrial strain parameters, biplane ejection fraction, ventricular global longitudinal strain, and global myocardial work (GMW). One-way ANOVA with appropriate post-hoc tests was done to compare the distribution of dependent variables among controls (n = 31), patients with corrected coartation (cCOAO) (n = 36), and patients with residual coartation (rCOAO) (n = 17). Multivariable linear regression was used to evaluate the association, in the 53 patients, between the dependent variables and parameters of CoAo severity: systolic blood pressure (SBP), left ventricular indexed mass (LVmass), Dgrad, and the ratio of the narrowest diameter of the aortic arch to the aorta at the diaphragm level (Aoratio). Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05. Results Patients with either cCOAO or rCOAO had lower E’ (p < 0.001), higher E/E’ (p < 0.001), lower atrial reservoir (p < 0.001) and conduit (p < 0.001) strain, when compared with controls (table 1). Patients with rCOAO had higher GMW when compared with either cCOAO or controls (p = 0.002). Multivariable regression analysis showed that both lower atrial reservoir and conduit strain were associated with a narrower aortic arch (lower Aoratio (p = 0.002 and p = 0.011, respectively); higher E/E’ with higher LVmass (p = 0.030); higher GMW with higher LVmass (p = 0.027) and Dgrad (p = 0.035). Patients subsequently submitted to an intervention for coartation treatment (n = 8) had lower atrial conduit (p = 0.007) and higher GMW (p = 0.015) when compared to all other patients (n = 45). Conclusion: Myocardial work emerged as a particularly useful tool as it was both significantly different between CoAo groups, and significantly higher in more severe patients, driven by the LV mass and residual gradient. This analysis may have a role in these patients’ clinical decision-making. Abstract Table 1