HIS4 Promoter Research Articles

Plasmid and Sequencing Library Preparation for CRISPRi Barcoded Expression Reporter Sequencing (CiBER-seq) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Genetic networks regulate nearly all biological processes, including cellular differentiation, homeostasis, and immune responses. Determining the precise role of each gene within a regulatory network can explain its overall, integrated function, and pinpoint mechanisms underlying misregulation in disease states. Transcriptional reporter assays are a useful tool for dissecting these genetic networks, because they link a molecular process to a measurable readout, such as the expression of a fluorescent protein. Here, we introduce a new technique that uses expressed RNA barcodes as reporters, to measure transcriptional changes induced by CRISPRi-mediated genetic perturbation across a diverse, genome-wide library of guide RNAs. We describe an exemplary reporter based on the promoter that drives His4 expression in these guidelines, which can be used as a framework to interrogate other expression phenotypes. In this workflow, a library of plasmids is assembled, encoding a CRISPRi guide RNA (gRNA) along with one or more transcriptional reporters that drive expression of guide-specific nucleotide barcode sequences. For example, when interrogating regulation of the budding yeast HIS4 promoter normalized against a control housekeeping promoter that drives Pgk1 expression, this plasmid library contains a gRNA expression cassette, a HIS4 reporter driving expression of one gRNA-specific nucleotide barcode, and a PGK1 reporter driving expression of a second, gRNA-specific barcode. Long-read sequencing is used to determine which gRNA is associated with these nucleotide barcodes. The plasmid library is then transformed into yeast cells, where each cell receives one plasmid, and experiences a genetic perturbation driven by the guide on that plasmid. The expressed RNA barcodes are extracted in bulk and quantified using high-throughput sequencing, thereby measuring the effect of their corresponding gRNA on barcoded reporter expression. In the case of the HIS4 reporter described above, guides disrupting translation elongation will increase expression of the associated HIS4 barcode specifically, without changing expression of the PGK1 control barcode. It is further possible to quantify plasmid abundance by DNA sequencing, as an additional approach to normalize for differences in plasmid abundance within the population of cells. This protocol outlines the steps to prepare barcode reporter CRISPRi plasmid libraries, link guides to barcodes with long-read sequencing, and measure expression changes through barcode RNA and DNA sequencing. This method is ideal for probing transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation, as it measures the effects of a genetic perturbation by directly quantifying reporter RNA abundance, rather than relying on indirect growth or fluorescence readouts. Graphic abstract.

Interactive Chromatin Modeling with Genome Browser

Nucleosomes are the fundamental structural unit of chromatin, therefore all genomic functions are influenced by nucleosome structure and dynamics. The standard nucleosome is an octasome and consists of 147 base pairs of double stranded DNA wrapped 1.7 times around eight histones. Sub-octasome (tetrasome, hexasome, hemisome) and super-octasome (chromatosome) states also exist. We have integrated our Interactive Chromatin Modeling(ICM) tools with the Dalliance genome browser (DGB) as a means of integrating physical modeling with bioinformatics. ICM is an interactive web based tool that allows users to rapidly fold any sequence of DNA into atomic or coarse grained models of chromatin. ICM-DGB is designed to unite ICM's physical modeling with informatics data obtained from public databases, e.g. experimentally or theoretically determined nucleosome positions. ICM-DGB currently allows users to manipulate nucleosome positions (add, delete and move), assign different conformational states to each nucleosome (e.g. tetrasome, octasome, chromatosome), display structural data from a model as track data in DGB (e.g. Roll, Slide or Twist) and map informatics data onto a molecular structure (e.g. nucleosome positions, DNA damage sites). Our web based implementation of ICM-DGB utilizes a coarse grained model of chromatin implemented in LAMMPS for structure relaxation and displays the model with JMol. Here we utilize experimentally determined reference maps of nucleosome positions for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome to assess chromatin folding for the CHA1, HIS3 and PHO5 promoters. The models demonstrate that experimentally determined nucleosome positions are insufficient to achieve tight packing of chromatin. As a tool, ICM-DGB supports cross-validation of physical modeling and informatics approaches and the ability to investigate structure-function relationships for regions of the genome ranging from kilobases to megabases.

Transcription Start Site Scanning and the Requirement for ATP during Transcription Initiation by RNA Polymerase II

Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase (Pol) II locates transcription start sites (TSS) at TATA-containing promoters by scanning sequences downstream from the site of preinitiation complex formation, a process that involves the translocation of downstream promoter DNA toward Pol II. To investigate a potential role of yeast Pol II transcription in TSS scanning, HIS4 promoter derivatives were generated that limited transcripts in the 30-bp scanned region to two nucleotides in length. Although we found that TSS scanning does not require RNA synthesis, our results revealed that transcription in the purified yeast basal system is largely ATP-independent despite a requirement for the TFIIH DNA translocase subunit Ssl2. This result is rationalized by our finding that, although they are poorer substrates, UTP and GTP can also be utilized by Ssl2. ATPγS is a strong inhibitor of rNTP-fueled translocation, and high concentrations of ATPγS make transcription completely dependent on added dATP. Limiting Pol II function with low ATP concentrations shifted the TSS position downstream. Combined with prior work, our results show that Pol II transcription plays an important role in TSS selection but is not required for the scanning reaction.

The Potato ERF Transcription Factor StERF3 Negatively Regulates Resistance to Phytophthora infestans and Salt Tolerance in Potato.

Ethylene response factors (ERFs) are unique to the plant kingdom and play crucial roles in plant response to various biotic and abiotic stresses. We show here that a potato StERF3, which contains an ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif in its C-terminal region, negatively regulates resistance to Phytophthora infestans and salt tolerance in potato. The StERF3 promoter responds to induction by salicylic acid, ABA ethylene and NaCl, as well as P. infestans, the causal agent of potato late blight disease. StERF3 could bind to the GCC box element of the HIS3 promoter and activate transcription of HIS3 in yeast cells. Importantly, silencing of StERF3 in potato produced an enhanced foliage resistance to P. infestans and elevated plant tolerance to NaCl stress accompanied by the activation of defense-related genes (PR1, NPR1 and WRKY1). In contrast, StERF3-overexpressing plants showed reduced expression of these defense-related genes and enhanced susceptibility to P. infestans, suggesting that StERF3 functions as a negative regulator of downstream defense- and/or stress-related genes in potato. StERF3 is localized to the nucleus. Interestingly, yeast two-hybrid assay and a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) test clarified that StERF3 could interact with other proteins in the cytoplasm which may lead to its re-localization between the nucleus and cytoplasm, revealing a novel means of StERF3 regulation. Taken together, these data provide new insights into the mechanism underlying how StERF3 negatively regulates late blight resistance and abiotic tolerance in potato and may have a potential use in engineering late blight resistance in potato.

57 Nucleosome [mis]positioning, chromatin folding, and a computational karyotype

Given a set of experimentally or theoretically determined nucleosome positions, it is possible to rapidly construct and interactively display 3D models of entire chromosomes. Our Interactive Chromatin Modeling Web (ICM-Web) server can fold and display megabase segments of chromatin in real time (Stolz & Bishop, 2010). These models are first order approximations that assume each nucleosome is a canonical octasome and that the linker DNA assumes a sequence-specific conformation similar to free DNA. Thermal fluctuations are included in the model that alters the nucleosome wrapping (i.e. entry/exit angle) and linker conformation. The models provide valuable insights, even if the chromatin folds are not necessarily accurate, e.g. visualization of DNA rotational phasing on individual nucleosomes and how DNA defects alter global structure. The DNA defects arise from known sequence-specific conformations and thermal fluctuations of DNA. Nucleosome positioning or mispositioning alters chromatin topology by exposing or hiding DNA defects. We utilize the CHA1, MFA2, HIS3, PHO5, and MMTV promoter complexes to illustrate these ideas. The six positioned nucleosomes in the MMTV promoter complex yield a much more extended structure is typically represented in literature. A compact chromatin structure for the MMTV requires more than six nucleosomes and thus mispositioning of some nucleosomes. Nucleosome [mis]positoning hides or exposes a DNA defect in the MMTV that may regulate chromatin looping associated with this promoter. Using whole genome nucleosome positioning data, we generate chromatin folds for each chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce a computational karyotype. Thermal motion associated with linker DNA plays a critical role in chromatin flexibility, reduces the spatial range of each fiber, and allows it to be compacted into the nucleus. ICM is available on the Chromatin Folding tab at http://www.latech.edu/~bishop.

Proteomic Analysis Demonstrates Activator- and Chromatin-specific Recruitment to Promoters

In-depth characterization of RNA polymerase II preinitiation complexes remains an important and challenging goal. We used quantitative mass spectrometry to explore context-dependent Saccharomyces cerevisiae preinitiation complex formation at the HIS4 promoter reconstituted on naked and chromatinized DNA templates. The transcription activators Gal4-VP16 and Gal4-Gcn4 recruited a limited set of chromatin-related coactivator complexes, namely the chromatin remodeler Swi/Snf and histone acetyltransferases SAGA and NuA4, suggesting that transcription stimulation is mediated through these factors. Moreover, the two activators differentially recruited the coactivator complexes, consistent with specific activator-coactivator interactions. Chromatinized templates suppressed recruitment of basal transcription factors, thereby amplifying the effect of activators, compared with naked DNA templates. This system is sensitive, highly reproducible, and easily applicable to mapping the repertoire of proteins found at any promoter.

Mechanisms of Eukaryotic Transcription Initiation

Regulation of gene expression determines cellular phenotype and when disrupted can lead to cancer and other disease states. For many genes regulation occurs via control of transcription initiation. Eukaryotic transcription initiation of mRNA is a complex process wherein a set of general transcription factors and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) assemble into a pre-initiation complex (PIC) at a promoter. The protein factors involved and the physical interactions between them and the promoter have been the subject of many years of research in the field. However, the topological dynamics of the DNA in eukaryotic PICs are not well understood, limiting mechanistic understanding of promoter unwinding, transcription start-site scanning, and promoter escape.Using magnetic tweezers we have observed ATP-dependent promoter opening by single minimal PICs comprised of TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF and TFIIH and Pol II assembled on the TATA-dependent HIS4 promoter from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Single molecule traces of TFIIH-dependent promoter opening reveal that the size of the transcription bubble is dynamic during initiation, displaying multiple transitions between intermediates with varying extents of open DNA. Furthermore, in contrast to prokaryotic initiation, promoter opening does not appear to be accompanied by significant DNA compaction. These observations place constraints on the promoter opening and transcription start site scanning mechanisms for yeast PICs.

Transcriptional activation requires protection of the TATA-binding protein Tbp1 by the ubiquitin-specific protease Ubp3

Tbp1, the TATA-binding protein, is essential for transcriptional activation, and Gal4 and Gcn4 are unable to fully activate transcription in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae TBP1E86D mutant strain. In the present study we have shown that the Tbp1E186D mutant protein is proteolytically instable, and we have isolated intragenic and extragenic suppressors of the transcription defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. The TBP1R6S mutation stabilizes the Tbp1E186D mutant protein and suppresses the defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. Furthermore, we found that the overexpression of the de-ubiquitinating enzyme Ubp3 (ubiquitin-specific protease 3) also stabilizes the Tbp1E186D mutant protein and suppresses of the defects of the TBP1E186D mutant strain. Importantly, the deletion of UBP3 and its cofactor BRE5 lead to increased degradation of wild-type Tbp1 protein and to defects in transcriptional activation by Gal4 and Gcn4. Purified GST (glutathione transferase)-Ubp3 reversed Tbp1 ubiquitination, and the deletion of UBP3 lead to the accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated species of Tbp1 in a proteaseome-deficient genetic background, demonstrating that Ubp3 reverses ubiquitination of Tbp1 in vitro and in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that Ubp3 was recruited to the GAL1 and HIS3 promoters upon the induction of the respective gene, indicating that protection of promoter-bound Tbp1 by Ubp3 is required for transcriptional activation.

Snf1p Regulates Gcn5p Transcriptional Activity by Antagonizing Spt3p

The budding yeast Gcn5p is a prototypic histone acetyltransferase controlling transcription of diverse genes. Here we show that Gcn5p is itself regulated by Snf1p and Spt3p. Snf1p likely controls Gcn5p via direct interaction. Mutating four residues in the Gcn5p catalytic domain, T203, S204, T211, and Y212 (TSTY), phenocopies snf1 null cells, including Gcn5p hypophosphorylation, hypoacetylation at the HIS3 promoter, and transcriptional defects of the HIS3 gene. However, overexpressing Snf1p suppresses the above phenotypes associated with the phosphodeficient TSTY mutant, suggesting that it is the interaction with Snf1p important for Gcn5p to activate HIS3. A likely mechanism by which Snf1p potentiates Gcn5p function is to antagonize Spt3p, because the HIS3 expression defects caused by snf1 knockout, or by the TSTY gcn5 mutations, can be suppressed by deleting SPT3. In vitro, Spt3p binds Gcn5p, but the interaction is drastically enhanced by the TSTY mutations, indicating that a stabilized Spt3p-Gcn5p interaction may be an underlying cause for the aforementioned HIS3 transcriptional defects. These results suggest that Gcn5p is a target regulated by the competing actions of Snf1p and Spt3p.

Calling cards for DNA-binding proteins

Identifying genomic targets of transcription factors is fundamental for understanding transcriptional regulatory networks. Current technology enables identification of all targets of a single transcription factor, but there is no realistic way to achieve the converse: identification of all proteins that bind to a promoter of interest. We have developed a method that promises to fill this void. It employs the yeast retrotransposon Ty5, whose integrase interacts with the Sir4 protein. A DNA-binding protein fused to Sir4 directs insertion of Ty5 into the genome near where it binds; the Ty5 becomes a "calling card" the DNA-binding protein leaves behind in the genome. We constructed customized calling cards for seven transcription factors of yeast by including in each Ty5 a unique DNA sequence that serves as a "molecular bar code." Ty5 transposition was induced in a population of yeast cells, each expressing a different transcription factor-Sir4 fusion and its matched, bar-coded Ty5, and the calling cards deposited into selected regions of the genome were identified, revealing the transcription factors that visited that region of the genome. In each region we analyzed, we found calling cards for only the proteins known to bind there: In the GAL1-10 promoter we found only calling cards for Gal4; in the HIS4 promoter we found only Gcn4 calling cards; in the PHO5 promoter we found only Pho4 and Pho2 calling cards. We discuss how Ty5 calling cards might be implemented for mapping all targets of all transcription factors in a single experiment.

Gcn5 Promotes Acetylation, Eviction, and Methylation of Nucleosomes in Transcribed Coding Regions

We report that coactivator SAGA, containing the HAT Gcn5p, occupies the GAL1 and ARG1 coding sequences during transcriptional induction, dependent on PIC assembly and Ser5 phosphorylation of the Pol II CTD. Induction of GAL1 increases H3 acetylation per nucleosome in the ORF, dependent on SAGA integrity but not the alternative Gcn5p-HAT complex ADA. Unexpectedly, H3 acetylation in ARG1 coding sequences does not increase during induction due to the opposing activities of multiple HDAs associated with the ORF. Remarkably, inactivation of Gcn5p decreases nucleosome eviction from both GAL1 and a long ( approximately 8 kb) ORF transcribed from the GAL1 promoter. This is associated with reduced Pol II occupancy at the 3' end and decreased mRNA production, selectively, for the long ORF. Gcn5p also enhances H3-K4 trimethylation in the ARG1 ORF and bulk histones. Thus, Gcn5p, most likely in SAGA, stimulates modification and eviction of nucleosomes in transcribed coding sequences and promotes Pol II elongation.

Non-optimal TATA Elements Exhibit Diverse Mechanistic Consequences

To reveal mechanistic differences in transcription initiation between variant TATA elements, in vivo and in vitro assays of the functional activity of 14 different sequences were compared. Variant elements exhibited particular degrees of activation in vivo but universally were unable to support the -fold activation observed for an element consisting of TATAAA. Each element was classified by its functional activity for in vitro interaction with TATA-binding protein (TBP), TFIIA, and TFIIB. Certain off-consensus TATA elements form poor binding sites for TBP and this compromised interaction interferes with higher order complex formation with TFIIA and/or TFIIB. Other elements are only modestly decreased for TBP binding but dramatically affected for higher order complex formation. Another distinct category is comprised of two elements (CATAAA and TATAAG), which are not affected in the initial formation of the TBP, TFIIA-TBP, or TFIIB-TBP complexes. However, CATAAA and TATAAG are unable to form a stable TFIIA-TBP-DNA complex in vitro. Moreover, fusion of TFIIA to TBP specifically restores activity from these two elements in vivo. Taken together, these results indicate that the interplay between the sequence of the TATA element and the components of the general transcription machinery can lead to variations in the formation of functional complexes and/or the stability of these complexes. These differences offer distinct opportunities for an organism to exploit diverse steps in the regulation of gene expression depending on the precise TATA element sequence at a given gene.

A DNA-tethered cleavage probe reveals the path for promoter DNA in the yeast preinitiation complex

To directly map the position of promoter DNA within the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription preinitiation complex (PIC), FeBABE was tethered to specific sites within the HIS4 promoter and used to map exposed surfaces of Pol II and the general transcription factors in proximity to DNA. Our results distinguish between previously proposed models for PIC structure and demonstrate that downstream promoter DNA is positioned over the central cleft of Pol II, with DNA upstream of TATA extending toward the Pol II subunit Rpb3. Also mapped were segments of TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF and TFIIH in proximity to promoter DNA. DNA downstream of the transcription bubble maps to a path between the two helicase subdomains of the TFIIH subunit Rad25 (also called XPB). Together, our results show how the general factors and Pol II converge on promoter DNA within the PIC.

Heterologous expression of membrane and soluble proteins derepresses GCN4 mRNA translation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

This paper describes the first physiological response at the translational level towards heterologous protein production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In yeast, the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha (eIF-2alpha) by Gcn2p protein kinase mediates derepression of GCN4 mRNA translation. Gcn4p is a transcription factor initially found to be required for transcriptional induction of genes responsible for amino acid or purine biosynthesis. Using various GCN4-lacZ fusions, knockout yeast strains, and anti-eIF-2alpha-P/anti-eIF-2alpha antibodies, we observed that heterologous expression of the membrane-bound alpha1beta1 Na,K-ATPase from pig kidney, the rat pituitary adenylate cyclase seven-transmembrane-domain receptor, or a 401-residue soluble part of the Na,K-ATPase alpha1 subunit derepressed GCN4 mRNA translation up to 70-fold. GCN4 translation was very sensitive to the presence of heterologous protein, as a density of 1 per thousand of heterologous membrane protein derepressed translation maximally. Translational derepression of GCN4 was not triggered by misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum, as expression of the wild type or temperature-sensitive folding mutants of the Na,K-ATPase increased GCN4 translation to the same extent. In situ activity of the heterologously expressed protein was not required for derepression of GCN4 mRNA translation, as illustrated by the expression of an enzymatically inactive Na,K-ATPase. Two- to threefold overexpression of the highly abundant and plasma membrane-located endogenous H-ATPase also induced GCN4 translation. Derepression of GCN4 translation required phosphorylation of eIF-2alpha, the tRNA binding domain of Gcn2p, and the ribosome-associated proteins Gcn1p and Gcn20p. The increase in Gcn4p density in response to heterologous expression did not induce transcription from the HIS4 promoter, a traditional Gcn4p target.

Length and Sequence Heterozygosity Differentially Affect HRAS1 Minisatellite Stability During Meiosis in Yeast

Minisatellites, one of the major classes of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotic genomes, are stable in somatic cells but destabilize during meiosis. We previously established a yeast model system by inserting the human Ha-ras/HRAS1 minisatellite into the HIS4 promoter and demonstrated that our system recapitulates all of the phenotypes associated with the human minisatellite. Here we demonstrate that meiotic minisatellite tract-length changes are half as frequent in diploid cells harboring heterozygous HRAS1 minisatellite tracts in which the two tracts differ by only two bases when compared to a strain with homozygous minisatellite tracts. Further, this decrease in alteration frequency is entirely dependent on DNA mismatch repair. In contrast, in a diploid strain containing heterozygous minisatellite tract alleles differing in length by three complete repeats, length alterations are observed at twice the frequency seen in a strain with homozygous tracts. Alterations consist of previously undetectable gene conversion events, plus nonparental length alteration events seen previously in strains with homozygous tracts. A strain containing tracts with both base and length heterozygosity exhibits the same level of alteration as a strain containing only length heterozygosity, indicating that base heterozygosity-dependent tract stabilization does not affect tract-length alterations occurring by gene conversion.

Promoter-specific shifts in transcription initiation conferred by yeast TFIIB mutations are determined by the sequence in the immediate vicinity of the start sites.

The general transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) is required for transcription of class II genes by RNA polymerase II. Previous studies demonstrated that mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUA7 gene, which encodes TFIIB, can alter transcription initiation patterns in vivo. To further delineate the functional domain and residues of TFIIB involved in transcription start site utilization, a genetic selection was used to isolate S. cerevisiae TFIIB mutants exhibiting downstream shifts in transcription initiation in vivo. Both dominant and recessive mutations conferring downstream shifts were identified at multiple positions within a highly conserved homology block in the N-terminal region of the protein. The TFIIB mutations conferred downstream shifts in transcription initiation at the ADH1 and CYC1 promoters, whereas no significant shifts were observed at the HIS3 promoter. Analysis of a series of ADH1-HIS3 hybrid promoters and variant ADH1 and HIS3 promoters containing insertions, deletions, or site-directed base substitutions revealed that the feature that renders a promoter sensitive to TFIIB mutations is the sequence in the immediate vicinity of the normal start sites. We discuss these results in light of possible models for the mechanism of start site utilization by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II and the role played by TFIIB.

Signaling through regulated transcription factor interaction: mapping of a regulatory interaction domain in the Myb-related Bas1p

Gene activation in eukaryotes is inherently combinatorial depending on cooperation between different transcription factors. An example where this cooperation seems to be directly exploited for regulation is the Bas1p/Bas2p couple in yeast. Bas1p is a Myb-related transcription factor that acts together with the homeodomain-related Bas2p (Pho2p) to regulate purine and histidine biosynthesis genes in response to extracellular purine limitation. We show that fusion of the two factors abolished adenine repression, suggesting that what is regulated by adenine is the Bas1p-Bas2p interaction. Analysis of Bas1p deletions revealed a critical domain (Bas1p interaction and regulatory domain, BIRD) acting in two-hybrid assays as an adenine-dependent Bas1p-Bas2p interaction domain. BIRD had a dual function, as an internal repressor of a centrally located Bas1p transactivation domain on the ADE1 promoter and as a Bas2p-dependent activator on the HIS4 promoter. This promoter-dependent behavior reflected a differential binding to the two promoters in vivo. On ADE1 Bas1p bound the promoter efficiently by itself, but required adenine limitation and Bas2p interaction through BIRD for derepression. On HIS4 efficient promoter binding and derepression required both factors and adenine limitation. We propose a promoter-dependent model for adenine regulation in yeast based on controlled Bas1p-Bas2p interactions through BIRD and exploited differentially by the two promoters.

Preferential accessibility of the yeast his3 promoter is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence, not by specific elements.

Yeast promoter regions are often more accessible to nuclear proteins than are nonpromoter regions. As assayed by HinfI endonuclease cleavage in living yeast cells, HinfI sites located in the promoters of all seven genes tested were 5- to 20-fold more accessible than sites in adjacent nonpromoter regions. HinfI hypersensitivity within the his3 promoter region is locally determined, since it was observed when this region was translocated to the middle of the ade2 structural gene. Detailed analysis of the his3 promoter indicated that preferential accessibility is not determined by specific elements such as the Gcn4 binding site, poly(dA-dT) sequences, TATA elements, or initiator elements or by transcriptional activity. However, progressive deletion of the promoter region in either direction resulted in a progressive loss of HinfI accessibility. Preferential accessibility is independent of the Swi-Snf chromatin remodeling complex, Gcn5 histone acetylase complexes Ada and SAGA, and Rad6, which ubiquitinates histone H2B. These results suggest that preferential accessibility of the his3 (and presumably other) promoter regions is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence (e.g., base composition or a related feature) rather than by defined sequence elements. The organization of the compact yeast genome into inherently distinct promoter and nonpromoter regions may ensure that transcription factors bind preferentially to appropriate sites in promoters rather than to the excess of irrelevant but equally high-affinity sites in nonpromoter regions.

Functional interaction of CCR4-NOT proteins with TATAA-binding protein (TBP) and its associated factors in yeast.

The CCR4-NOT transcriptional regulatory complex affects expression of a number of genes both positively and negatively. We report here that components of the CCR4-NOT complex functionally and physically interact with TBP and TBP-associated factors. First, mutations in CCR4-NOT components suppressed the his4-912delta insertion in a manner similar to that observed for the defective TBP allele spt15-122. Second, using modified HIS3 promoter derivatives containing specific mutations within the TATA sequence, we found that the NOT proteins were general repressors that disrupt TBP function irrespective of the DNA sequence. Third, increasing the dosage of NOT1 specifically inhibited the ability of spt15-122 to suppress the his4-912delta insertion but did not affect the Spt- phenotype of spt3 or spt10 at this locus. Fourth, spt3, spt8, and spt15-21 alleles (all involved in affecting interaction of SPT3 with TBP) suppressed ccr4 and caf1 defects. Finally, we show that NOT2 and NOT5 can be immunoprecipitated by TBP. NOT5 was subsequently shown to associate with TBP and TAFs and this association was dependent on the integrity of TFIID. These genetic and physical interactions indicate that one role of the CCR4-NOT proteins is to inhibit functional TBP-DNA interactions, perhaps by interacting with and modulating the function of TFIID.

The TATA-binding protein-associated factor yTafII19p functionally interacts with components of the global transcriptional regulator Ccr4-Not complex and physically interacts with the Not5 subunit.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 gene is a model system to characterize transcription initiation from different types of core promoters. The NOT genes were identified by mutations that preferentially increased transcription of the HIS3 promoter lacking a canonical TATA sequence. They encode proteins associated in a complex that also contains the Caf1 and Ccr4 proteins. It has been suggested that the Ccr4-Not complex represses transcription by inhibiting factors more specifically required for promoters lacking a TATA sequence. A potential target is the yTaf(II)19 subunit of TFIID, which, when depleted, leads to a preferential decrease of HIS3 TATA-less transcription. We isolated conditional taf19 alleles that display synthetic growth phenotypes when combined with not4 or specific not5 alleles. Inactivation of yTaf(II)19p by shifting these mutants to the restrictive temperature led to a more rapid and striking decrease in transcription from promoters that do not contain a canonical TATA sequence. We demonstrated by the two-hybrid assay and directly in vitro that yTaf(II)19p and Not5p could interact. Finally, we found by the two-hybrid assay that yTaf(II)19p also interacted with many components of the Ccr4-Not complex. Taken together, our results provide evidence that interactions between Not5p and yTaf(II)19p may be involved in transcriptional regulation by the Ccr4-Not complex.