Hip Procedures Research Articles

Moving Beyond Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Bacteremia: Are Modern Critical Care Calculators Useful in Predicting Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Treatment Outcomes in Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BackgroundIn critically ill periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients, surgeons need to balance the need for aggressive, definitive treatment against the health state of a potentially unstable patient. A clear understanding of the association between treatment outcomes and assessment scores for sepsis would benefit clinical decision-making in these urgent cases. The current study evaluates the effect of critical illness on debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) outcomes, as defined by systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and, for the first time, by contemporary markers quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). MethodsWe retrospectively identified 253 patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. The SIRS, qSOFA, and MEWS scores were calculated based on variables on admission. A DAIR treatment failure, defined as reoperation or mortality, was measured at 90 days and two years. Univariate analysis was used to determine the association between elevated critical care scores and DAIR failure. ResultsThe DAIR treatment success was 59% at two years, with hip procedures and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 1 independently associated with higher odds of DAIR failure. There were 43 patients (16%) who presented with SIRS, however, only four (2%) had positive qSOFA scores. Neither SIRS nor qSOFA were predictive of DAIR failure. For knees only, elevated MEWS scores were predictive of 90-day DAIR failure (P = 0.019). ConclusionOver one in six patients undergoing DAIR for PJI presented with SIRS, while only one in 50 had a positive qSOFA. The SIRS and qSOFA scores were not predictive of DAIR failure. Elevated MEWS scores were associated with DAIR failure at 90 days postoperatively in knee PJIs only, and should be confirmed in a larger cohort. Our results suggest that SIRS is not predictive of DAIR outcomes, possibly because it overestimates the proportion of critically ill patients.

A Multicenter Analysis of 3 Decades of Hip Arthroscopy: Evolving Techniques and Growing Patient Volumes From 1988 to 2022.

The number of hip arthroscopies performed in the United States has grown significantly over the past several decades, with evolving indications and emerging techniques. To (1) examine the evolution of hip arthroscopy at 3 tertiary referral centers between 1988 and 2022 and (2) quantify trends in patient demographics and procedures performed. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at 3 academic centers between 1988 and 2022. Demographic data were collected using standardized forms and operative notes, and intraoperative images were manually reviewed for each patient to determine the specific procedures performed at the time of the hip arthroscopy. Surgical procedures were plotted over time to evaluate trends. Patients were divided into 3 time periods for comparison: early hip arthroscopy from 1988 to 2008, 2009 (the time of the first labral repair in our cohort) to 2015, and 2016 to 2022. A total of 3000 patients (age, 35.7 ± 13.8 years; age range, 10-89 years; female sex, 2109 (70.3%); body mass index, 27.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2) underwent arthroscopic hip procedures between 1988 and 2022. The mean number of cases increased from a mean of 3.2 per year in 1988-2008 to 285.9 per year in 2016-2022 (P < .001). Labral treatment at the time of primary hip arthroscopy evolved from 100% debridement and 0% repair in 1988-2008 to 5.0% debridement, 94.0% repair, and 1.0% labral reconstruction in 2016-2022 (P < .001). Cam resection increased from 4.1% in 1988-2008 to 86.9% in 2016-2022 (P < .001). By 2022, 45 out of 325 cases (13.8%) were revisions. The rate of capsular repair at the time of primary hip arthroscopy increased from 0.0% in 1988-2008 up to 81.0% in 2016-2022. There has been a significant growth of hip arthroscopy volumes as well as a significant transition from use as a tool for diagnosis and labral debridement to procedures restoring native anatomy including labral repair, cam resection, capsular repair, periacetabular osteotomy, and gluteal repair.

The push-through total femoral prosthesis for revision of a total hip or knee replacement with extreme bone loss.

The aim of the present study was to assess outcomes of using the push-through total femoral prothesis (PTTF) for revision total hip replacement with extreme bone loss. 10 consecutive patients who received PTTF between 2012 and 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Primary functional outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Range of motion, complications, and ambulatory status were also recorded to assess secondary outcomes. 2 of 10 patients underwent surgery with PTTF for both knee and hip arthroplasty revision. The mean time between index surgery and PTTF was 15 years (3-32 yrs). Acetabular components were revised in 6 of 10 patients during PTTF application. After a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, hip dislocations occurred in 3 patients. All of the dislocated hips were ones with retained conventional non-constrained acetabular bearings. Patient satisfaction was high (MSTS: 67%, HHS: 61.2%, TESS 64.6%) despite high re-operation rate (40%) and minor postoperative problems. PTTF should be considered for hip and knee arthroplasty revision procedures in patients with an extreme bone defect. Consistent usage of constrained liners should be considered to avoid hip dislocation, which was our main problem following the procedure.

Pathway to Excellence: One Institution's Experience Obtaining the Joint Commission's Advanced Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Certification.

As the prevalence of total hip and total knee arthroplasty procedures increase over the next decades, hospitals seek opportunities to improve quality outcomes while simultaneously limiting costs and mitigating risks of complications. The Joint Commission's Advanced Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement (THKR) certification is one of the highest quality standard certification programs in the nation and is the only one that collaborates with the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. To obtain THKR certification, several requirements based on evidence-based clinical practice guidelines must be met. The process is described from initial identification of stakeholders to ongoing efforts to retain certification. Joint Commission THKR certification was awarded after rigorous review and on-site visit. Compliance with advanced care standards from the time of orthopedic consultation through postsurgical follow-up was reviewed. Joint Commission THKR certification provides supporting evidence of the institutions journey in processes toward delivering high quality clinical care. A multidisciplinary team with ongoing collaboration is necessary to obtain and retain certification.

How Does the New Australian EQ-5D-5L Value Set Impact Utility Scores? Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

With advances in health state valuation methods, new value sets may be developed for some countries. Quantifying the impact of moving between existing and new value sets is critical for guiding decisions around utility score interpretation, reporting and comparison with published scores. The aim of this study is to examine, using large-scale national registry data, how the new Australian EQ-5D-5L value set impacts utility scores for patients undergoing joint replacement. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry were used for this analysis. All primary total hip (THR), knee (TKR), and shoulder replacement (TSR) procedures between 2018 and 2022 with pre-operative and 6-month post-operative EQ-5D-5L data were included. Utility scores were generated using the 2013 and 2023 Australian value sets ('previous' and 'new' value sets, respectively) and analysed descriptively for each joint replacement cohort. Agreement between the two utility score sets was evaluated using concordance correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. EQ-5D-5L data were available for 17,576 THR, 23,010 TKR, and 1667 TSR procedures. The new value set produced a lowest possible EQ-5D-5L utility score of -0.30 (compared with -0.68 previously) and fewer patients had 'worse-than-dead' quality of life (score < 0.00) before surgery. Mean pre-operative scores were 0.21 (THR), 0.19 (TKR), and 0.17 (TSR) units higher with the new value set, and mean post-operative scores were 0.11-0.14 units higher. The new value set resulted in smaller effect sizes for the THR (1.08 versus 1.23) and TKR cohorts (0.86 versus 0.92). There was moderate-to-good overall agreement (coefficients: 0.70-0.80), but concordance varied by time point. Although acceptable agreement was evident, the new Australian value set produces less extreme negative utility scores and markedly higher group-level scores. Transition to reporting new EQ-5D-5L utility scores will require accompanying explanation to signal measurement modifications rather than better quality of life.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concept Review.

Intraoperative acetabular fractures (IAFs), a complication seldomly encountered in total hip arthroplasty, are typically a result of the impact of insertion of a cementless press-fit cup. Factors that contribute to the risk of these types of fractures include poor bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and the use of a press-fit cup that is excessively large. The approach to management of these fractures is dependent on when they are identified. Immediate stabilization measures should be implemented for management of fractures detected during surgery. When fractures are detected postoperatively, the decision regarding conservative treatment is dependent on the stability of the implant and the specific fracture pattern. In the majority of cases, effective treatment of an acetabular fracture detected intraoperatively can be administered using a multi-hole revision cup along with anchoring screws in the various regions of the acetabulum. Selection of plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is recommended when there is a large posterior wall fragment or pelvic discontinuity. In cases where anatomical dimensions allow, cup-cage reconstruction may offer a promising alternative to a combined hip procedure. The number of reports addressing the management of IAFs is limited. This review focuses on outlining the strategies that are currently available for management of this seldomly encountered complication.

The anterior femoral cortical window as an alternative to an extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty surgery: the evolution of the surgical technique and outcomes in 22 consecutive cases.

The anterior femoral cortical window is an attractive alternative to the extended trochanteric osteotomy when removing femoral cement in revision hip arthroplasty. CT-based additive manufacturing technology has now permitted the creation of patient-specific instrumented (PSI) jigs to facilitate this. The jig simplifies creation of the window, potentiating medullary exposure through an optimally-sized window and therefore cement removal. Between 2006 and 2021 this technique was used in 22 cases at a regional hospital in New Zealand (mean age 74; range 44 to 89 years). 16 cases were for aseptic loosening and 6 for infection. We describe the technique and our case series. Bone incorporation for the cortical window was assessed in all cases using CT imaging. Oxford scores were obtained at a minimum of 6 months after revision surgery. Of the 6 septic cases 5 went onto successful stage-2 procedures, the other to a Girdlestone procedure. The mean rectangular shaped window size was 8 × 1.5 cm and in each case, this provided adequate intramedullary access. On average at minimum 5 months post-surgery, 84% bone incorporation of the cortical window occurred on CT (40-100%). The functional outcome Oxford hip score was 37 (range 22-48) for 10 cases. There were 2 cases with femoral component subsidence which then stabilised. This technique description and retrospective case series has shown the effectiveness of removing a distal femoral cement mantle in revision hip arthroplasty using an anterior femoral cortical window, recently optimised using a PSI jig. This technique is a straightforward alternative to a trochanteric osteotomy. Reliable bony integration of the cortical window occurred and functional outcomes were comparable with the mean score for revision hip procedures reported in the New Zealand Joint Registry.

Enhancing orthopedic care: The impact of introducing nurse practitioners

IntroductionOrthopedic surgery constitutes a significant portion of surgical interventions globally, driven by aging populations (Spence et al., 2019). Nurse practitioners (NPs) have emerged as essential team members in orthopedic surgery, offering expertise and advanced training. PurposeThis paper describes a practice development initiative that saw the integration of NPs to the orthopedic team to provide postoperative care to patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. MethodsAggregate data was collected from electronic health records and from online surveys. ResultsUsing descriptive and inferential statistics our data analysis revealed significant improvements post-NP implementation. Monthly surgeries increased by 41.6%, indicating enhanced access to care. The average length of stay decreased statistically for both hip and knee surgeries (p < 0.001), resulting in substantial cost savings and streamlined resource utilization. The readmission rate post-discharge also decreased by 41.6%, reflecting improved continuity of care facilitated by NPs. Surveys among healthcare staff demonstrated positive feedback regarding NP integration, highlighting improved accessibility, bed utilization, and timely treatment of medical issues. ConclusionThis study underscores the multifaceted benefits of NP integration in orthopedic care, including enhanced patient outcomes, improved healthcare efficiency, and positive impacts on the healthcare team dynamics. Continued investment in NP programs in orthopedic settings is crucial for further optimizing care delivery and patient outcomes. Advocating for the expansion of the NP role in orthopedic surgery will contribute to elevating the standard of care in this specialty.

Assessing osteoporosis screening compliance in total joint surgery: a retrospective chart review.

Osteoporosis is a prevalent concern, particularly among aging populations, leading to increased risk of fractures, including those related to hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Screening for osteoporosis, especially with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, is crucial for early detection and management. This study aimed to assess adherence to osteoporosis screening guidelines among patients aged 65 and older undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within a single health network. Factors influencing screening adherence were also explored. A retrospective chart review of 2,160 patients undergoing elective THA or TKA between January 2019 and January 2023 was conducted. Demographic data, osteoporosis screening status, and occurrence of periprosthetic fractures were analyzed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Only 24.1 % of eligible patients underwent a DXA scan prior to surgery. Females were more likely to undergo screening than males, and race was also associated with screening status. A total of 45 periprosthetic fractures were identified, with no significant correlation between osteoporosis status, DXA screening, and fracture occurrence. Adherence to osteoporosis screening guidelines among geriatric patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty remains low within the studied health network. Despite the lack of correlation between screening and fracture occurrence in this study, the importance of screening and potential optimization in high-risk patients is emphasized. Further research is needed to assess outcomes associated with different care pathways in bone health screening and management for elective geriatric total joint patients.

Effect of Previous Hip Arthroscopy on Results after Hip Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Hip arthroplasty is the most frequently performed adult reconstructive hip procedure. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful procedures performed in modern orthopedics. The primary indication for THA in a patient with endstage arthropathy is pain resulting in significant limitation of physical activity. Important factors to be considered in the decision to recommend or undergo THA are patient age, diagnosis, and medical comorbidities. Aim of the Work This review pursues to systematically review the current evidence in the literature to determine whether previous hip arthroscopy would direct to inferior results in patients undergoing succeeding hip arthroplasty. Patients and Methods The first literature search identified 412 studies in total. After removing duplicates, 307 articles were deemed irrelevant based on their title and Abstractscreening. Eighty- two papers were eliminated from the remaining 105 research based on their title and Abstract. After carefully reviewing the entire text of all remaining publications, 11 studies were eliminated for reasons such as conference Abstracts, reviews, and lack of comparison between intervention and control groups. Additionally, one cohort research that compared THA results in patients who had previously undergone hip salvage surgery to those who had not previously undergone hip salvage surgery was removed. Finally, eleven studies spanning the years 2012 to 2019 were available for meta-analysis. Results Of these citations could result from the studies’ varying designs and sample sizes. Estimated blood loss, on the other hand, was deemed a reasonable indicator of operating time. The consistency in blood loss between the groups may reflect a similar operative time. Conclusion Patients who have previously undergone hip arthroscopy are more likely to experience postoperative complications such as dislocation, revision, and reoperation following subsequent hip arthroplasty. On the other hand, prior hip arthroscopy did not appear to affect functional or intraoperative results.

Poster 396: Performing Sports Medicine Procedures in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Is More Cost Effective than Hospital Outpatient Departments for Medicare Recipients

Objectives: To compare the overall cost of sports medicine procedures for Medicare beneficiaries in both ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) and hospital outpatient department (HOPD) settings. Secondary aims were to compare facility fees, surgeon fees, Medicare payments, and patient payments between ASCs and HOPDs. Methods: Publicly available data from The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) was accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify sports medicine procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Facility fees, surgeon fees, total costs, Medicare payment, and patient payment were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and standard deviations. Cost differences were analyzed using Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Sixty-two CPT codes were identified. Shoulder procedures (n=25) at ASCs had lower total costs (3,622±1,156 vs 6,262±1,759; p&lt;0.001), facility fees (2,777±1,020 vs 5,416±1,606; p&lt;0.001), Medicare payments (2,898±928 vs 5,009±1,407 p&lt;0.001), and patient payments (724±232 vs 1,252±352; p&lt;0.001) compared to HOPDs. Knee procedures (n=31) at ASCs had lower total costs (4,236±2,741 vs 6,668±3,341; p=0.006), facility fees (3,408±2,507 vs 5,840±3,116; p=0.006), Medicare payments (3,389±2,193 vs 5,458±2,955; p=0.006), and patient payments (847±548 vs 1,209±429; p=0.011). Hip procedures (n=6) at ASCs had lower total costs (3,583±698 vs 6,671±1,451; p=0.025), facility fees (2,725±6689 vs 5,813±1,431; p=0.025), Medicare payments (2,866±558 vs 5,336±1,161; p=0.025), and patient payments (716±139 vs 1,333±290; p=0.025). Conclusions: Sports medicine procedures performed at ASCs for Medicare recipients were found to have overall average total cost savings of 40% compared to those performed at HOPDs (42% savings for shoulder, 36% for knee, and 46% for hip procedures). ASC use conferred lower facility fees, patient payments, and Medicare payments in all cohorts. These results inform surgeons, patients, and insurance officials of the cost-effectiveness of outpatient surgical facilities for Medicare recipients undergoing sports medicine procedures.

Poster 199: High Prevalence of Elevated Beighton Scores in Females Undergoing FAI Surgery

Objectives: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is classically described as restricted internal rotation in flexion resulting in labral and cartilage pathology. Despite 20 years of FAI research, there is still limited understanding of the drivers of symptomatology in the subset of patients with underlying FAI morphology. While the prevalence of FAI morphologies is substantially higher in men, numerous studies have shown more women being treated for FAI compared to men. Soft-tissue laxity and hip instability are increasingly recognized as a potential contributor to symptoms in addition to FAI. The Beighton score is a well-accepted means to quantify soft-tissue laxity and has been validated for self-scoring. The purpose of the current study was to (1) investigate the prevalence of soft-tissue laxity in male and female patients presenting with symptomatic FAI in a multicenter prospective cohort study, and (2) correlate soft-tissue laxity with patient primary complaints of either mobility, stability, or pain. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or Tonnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. The Beighton score was assessed by electronic patient self-scoring. Beighton scores &gt;4 were considered a marker of soft-tissue laxity. The MSP index was utilized to have patients rank from most to least the biggest problems with their hip: Mobility (M), Stability (S), or Pain (P). The chi-square or Fisher exact test were utilized to compare groups. Results: The prevalence of Beighton scores &gt;4 was 57.2% in female patients, compared to 29.3% in male patients (p &lt; 0.001). In female patients, 44.4%, 22.6%, and 7.7% had Beighton scores of 5+, 7+, and 9 respectively, compared to 16.7%, 5.8%, and 1.8% in male patients (all p &lt; 0.005). In the overall FAI cohort, pain was the primary complaint in 72.1% of patients, compared to 24.2% complaining primarily of mobility and 3.7% complaining primarily of stability. Among female patients, the presence of soft-tissue laxity (relative to thresholds of Beighton 4, 5, 7, and 9) did not significantly influence the patient primary complaints (with pain being the predominant complaint). Overall, 85 female patients had a Beighton score of 7 or greater and only 2.4% reported stability of the hip as a primary complaint, compared to 2.4% of female patients with a Beighton &lt;7. Stability was more commonly indicated as a second most important factor in the setting of soft-tissue laxity, compared to mobility. Among female patients with a Beighton &gt;7, 29.5% reported stability as a primary or secondary complaint, compared to 15.2% of female patients with a Beighton score &lt;7. Conclusions: Over half of female patients undergoing FAI surgery have underlying soft-tissue laxity as measured by the Beighton score. In the setting of soft-tissue laxity, patient primary symptomatic complaint remains pain, but a secondary complaint is significant more likely to be stability rather than mobility (compared to FAI patients without soft tissue laxity complain of mobility secondarily over stability). Further research is needed to better understand the role of soft-tissue laxity in the pathophysiology of FAI and the outcomes of surgical treatment.

Poster 189: Does Patient Resiliency Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes at Presentation in Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Objectives: The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of treated is increasingly recognized in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly, in prearthritic hip disorders, young adult hip patients often have significant psychological undertones. Patient resiliency, as quantified by the brief resiliency scale (BRS), is a static patient characteristic and has been increasingly recognized for its potential role in pain and symptomatology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the correlation between BRS and traditional hip patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 patients undergoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or high-grade osteoarthritis. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of pain interference, physical function, mobility, anxiety, and depression, as well as hip disability and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), and short form-12 (SF-12). Resiliency was divided into low resiliency (score &lt; 3), normal resiliency (score 3 to 4.3), and high resiliency (score &gt; 4.3) as described by Smith et al1 to use as categorical variables to compare to the other patient-reported scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated and the Kruskall Willis test was used to measure association between BRS and the other PROMs for continuous and categorical values, respectively. R values ≥0.7, ≥0.4, and ≥0.1 signify a strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively. For categorical analysis, P values &lt; 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort of 696 patients had mean age was 24.9 ± 7.9 years and a female predominance at 56%. Average BRS scores were 3.7 ± 0.7. Overall, 13.7% of patients had low resiliency, while 65.8% had normal resiliency and 20.5% had high resiliency. Linear correlation, using Pearson coefficients, found associations between BRS and all other scores. There were only weak associations between BRS scores and PROs (all r &lt; 0.25) except a moderate correlation with PROMIS depression (r = -0.476, p &lt; 0.001) and PROMIS anxiety (r = -0.481, p &lt; 0.001). Patients in higher resiliency groups reported less severe symptoms in HOOS – quality of life (p &lt; 0.001), HOOS – sports and recreation (p = 0.004), HOOS – activities of daily living (p = 0.004), HOOS – pain (p = 0.026), iHOT-12 (p = 0.01), mHHS (p = 0.004), SF-12 mental (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS physical function (p = 0.003), PROMIS pain (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS mobility (p &lt; 0.001), PROMIS depression (p &lt; 0.001), and PROMIS anxiety (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with higher activity levels (UCLA ≥9) demonstrated higher resiliency (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In FAI patients, patient resiliency appears to influence baseline PROs. Overall, 14% of patients had low resiliency while 21% had high resiliency. Further studies are needed to investigate this relationship and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. [Figure: see text]

The Relationship Between Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Joint Replacement Surgery and Social Deprivation on the Wirral.

This study aimed to investigate the associa-tion between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), both pre- and post-operatively, and socio-economic deprivation among patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgeries in the diverse socioeconomic region of Wirral. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving 1666 adult patients who underwent hip or knee replacement procedures between 2012 and 2019. Socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). Pre- and post-operative outcomes were measured using the Oxford Hip and Knee scores. The mean scores for both pre-and post-operative assessments (Q1 and Q2) exhibited a strong positive correlation with PROM scores, regardless of gender, across both hip and knee replacements. However, the mean difference in scores between Q1 and Q2 showed no significant correlation with the IMD decile. Notably, patients residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation demonstrated lower PROMs both before and after the surgery. The Oxford Hip and Knee scores are widely employed for evaluating health status in patients. In our study, these scores were influenced by IMD decile, supporting the holistic assessment approach employed by the treating unit, which does not rely solely on PROM scores as a trigger for arthroplasty discussions. Furthermore, our findings align with the practice of NHS Digital, which publishes PROM scores based on changes in PROM scores pre- and post-operation rather than absolute PROM scores. This approach appears to be less influenced by deprivation in the catchment area, as the improvement or change in scores was poorly correlated with socioeconomic factors.

Evaluating pelvic tilt using the pelvic antero-posterior radiographs: A novel method.

Pelvic tilt (PT) is an important parameter for orthopedic surgeries involving hip and spine, typically determined from sagittal pelvic radiographs. However, various challenges can compromise the feasibility of measurement from sagittal imaging, including obscured landmarks, anatomical variations, hardware interference, and limited medical resources. Addressing these challenges and with the aim of reducing radiation exposure to patients, our study developed a novel method to estimate PT from antero-posterior (AP) radiographs, using vertical distances from the pelvic outlet and obturator foramen. We correlated these measurements with PT, defined both anatomically (anterior pelvic plane, PTa) and mechanically (centers of femoral heads and sacral plate, PTm). The study explored creating linear, exponential, and multivariate regression models based on twelve 3D CT-derived pelvic models (six men, six women), simulating AP radiograph projections with controlled PTs. We then validated these models against 105 pairs of patient stereoradiographs. Statistical analysis revealed that combined exponential-linear models yielded the most accurate results, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.75 for PTa and 0.77 for PTm, and mean absolute errors of 3.7° ± 2.6° for PTa and 4.5° ± 3.4° for PTm, showing excellent measurement reliability (all ICCs > 0.9) without significant gender discrepancies. In conclusion, this study presents a validated, simple, and accessible method for estimating PT using AP radiograph parameters, supported by the Supporting Information S1: Excel Tool, showing great potential for clinical application in hip and spine procedures.

Chinese expert consensus on clinical practice of daytime hip arthroplasty

Daytime hip arthroplasty refers to a medical procedure where a patient undergoes admission, surgery, and discharge all within a single day (24 hours). The establishment of daytime hip arthroplasty centers signifies a significant paradigm shift in the development model of modern hospitals. While numerous nationally accredited large medical institutions are undertaking daytime hip arthroplasty in various forms and scales, there remains a lack of standardized system processes and criteria. In this context, the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Bone and Joint Specialty Committee of the China Ambulatory Surgery Alliance, Joint Surgery Branch of the Chinese Orthopedic Association, and Osteoarthritis Study Group of the Chinese Association of Orthopedic Surgeons have collaboratively organized experts in the relevant field domestically. Leveraging international experiences in daytime hip arthroplasty and integrating them with the clinical practices of well-established medical institutions conducting daytime surgeries in China, they have arrived at consensus recommendations. These recommendations cover the establishment of daytime hip arthroplasty centers, policies, procedures, and perioperative management. The ultimate goal is to provide reference points and guidance for the standardized implementation of daytime hip arthroplasty.

Risk Versus Reward: Hospitals Incentivized More Than Surgeons to Care for Riskier Arthroplasty Patients

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between risk and reimbursement for both surgeons and hospitals among Medicare patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). MethodsThe “2021 Medicare Physician and Other Provider” and “2021 Medicare Inpatient Hospitals” files were used. Patient comorbidity profiles were collected, including the mean patient hierarchal condition category (HCC) risk score. Surgeon data included all primary TJA procedures (inpatient and outpatient) billed to Medicare in 2021, while hospital data included all such inpatient episodes. Surgeon and hospital reimbursements were collected. All episodes were split into a “sicker cohort” with an HCC risk score of 1.5 or more and a “healthier cohort” with HCC risk scores less than 1.5. Variables were compared across cohorts. ResultsIn 2021, 386,355 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures were billed to Medicare and were included. The mean surgeon reimbursement among the sicker cohort was $1,021.91, which was less than for the healthier cohort of $1,060.13 (P < .001). Meanwhile, for the hospital analysis, 112,012 Medicare TJA patients were admitted as inpatients and included. The mean reimbursement to hospitals was significantly greater for the sicker cohort at $13,950.66, compared to the healthier cohort of $8,430.46. For both analyses, the sicker patient cohorts had a significantly higher rate of all comorbidities assessed (P < .001). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that mean surgeon reimbursement was lower for primary TJA among sicker patients in comparison to their healthier counterparts, while hospital reimbursement was higher for sicker patients. This represents a discrepancy in the incentivization of care for complex patients, as hospitals receive increased remuneration for taking on extra risk, while surgeons get paid less on average for performing TJA on sicker patients. Such data should inform future policy to assure continued access to arthroplasty care among complex patients.

Preoperative prediction model for risk of readmission after total joint replacement surgery: a random forest approach leveraging NLP and unfairness mitigation for improved patient care and cost-effectiveness

BackgroundThe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) imposes payment penalties for readmissions following total joint replacement surgeries. This study focuses on total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty procedures as they account for most joint replacement surgeries. Apart from being a burden to healthcare systems, readmissions are also troublesome for patients. There are several studies which only utilized structured data from Electronic Health Records (EHR) without considering any gender and payor bias adjustments.MethodsFor this study, dataset of 38,581 total knee, hip, and shoulder replacement surgeries performed from 2015 to 2021 at Novant Health was gathered. This data was used to train a random forest machine learning model to predict the combined endpoint of emergency department (ED) visit or unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge or discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) following the surgery. 98 features of laboratory results, diagnoses, vitals, medications, and utilization history were extracted. A natural language processing (NLP) model finetuned from Clinical BERT was used to generate an NLP risk score feature for each patient based on their clinical notes. To address societal biases, a feature bias analysis was performed in conjunction with propensity score matching. A threshold optimization algorithm from the Fairlearn toolkit was used to mitigate gender and payor biases to promote fairness in predictions.ResultsThe model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.738 (95% confidence interval, 0.724 to 0.754) and an Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.406 (95% confidence interval, 0.384 to 0.433). Considering an outcome prevalence of 16%, these metrics indicate the model’s ability to accurately discriminate between readmission and non-readmission cases within the context of total arthroplasty surgeries while adjusting patient scores in the model to mitigate bias based on patient gender and payor.ConclusionThis work culminated in a model that identifies the most predictive and protective features associated with the combined endpoint. This model serves as a tool to empower healthcare providers to proactively intervene based on these influential factors without introducing bias towards protected patient classes, effectively mitigating the risk of negative outcomes and ultimately improving quality of care regardless of socioeconomic factors.

SHORT-TERM COMPLICATIONS AND REOPERATION RATES AFTER PELVIC OSTEOTOMY: A REVIEW OF 1,348 CASES IN ENGLAND FROM 2010 TO 2023

Hip dysplasia is a common cause of hip pain in young adults. Pelvic osteotomy (PO) techniques are the gold standard for treating symptomatic patients, albeit technically demanding. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the 90-day complication rate, and (2) investigate the reasons, frequency and timing of reoperations following primary PO procedures.We retrospectively analysed the National Hospital Episode Statistics database, examining all patients aged over 14 who underwent PO in NHS England hospitals from 2010 to 2023. We identified index procedures and reoperations using relevant OPCS-4 codes. We analysed patient demographics, 90-day complications, and readmission rates for ipsilateral metalwork removal, revision PO, hip arthroscopy (HA), and THR conversion, and calculated the mean time to reoperations.This study included 1,348 PO cases (mean age: 28.7±9.1 years, 89.5% female). The mean hospital stay was 5.4±3.9 days, with a 90-day readmission rate of 0.52% at a mean of 51.0±17.2 days. The most common causes were infection (0.22%) and reoperation (0.15%). The 90-day rate of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis was 0.074%. One patient died within 90 days.Overall, 810 patients (60.1%) were readmitted for a subsequent hip procedure at a mean of 2.12±1.90 years following their primary PO. Metalwork removal was required in 616 patients (45.7%) at a mean of 1.70±1.19 years. Readmission rates for revision PO, HA, and THR, were 4.23% (mean time: 2.89±0.82 years), 4.15% (mean time: 2.91±2.28 years) and 6.01% (mean time: 5.24±3.08 years) respectively.This study highlights a low 90-day complication rate following primary PO, but a high reoperation rate, mainly for metalwork removal. We provide the most up-to-date report of revision PO, HA and THR conversion rates in England. These findings provide valuable insight that can facilitate informed decision-making, expectation-setting, and post-operative planning, also establishing a benchmark for future quality improvement.

Postoperative Opioid Usage and Disposal Strategies After Arthroscopic Procedures in a Young Cohort: A Prospective Observational Study.

Although several studies have noted that patients are routinely overprescribed opioids, few have reported usage after arthroscopic surgery. To determine opioid consumption and allocation for unused opioids after common arthroscopic surgeries. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Patients between the ages of 15 and 40 years who were scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), labral repair of the hip or shoulder, meniscectomy, or meniscal repair were prospectively enrolled. Patients were prescribed either 5 mg hydrocodone-325 mg acetaminophen or 5 mg oxycodone-325 mg acetaminophen based on surgeon preference. Patients completed a daily opioid usage survey during the 2-week postoperative period. In addition, patients completed a survey on postoperative day 21 inquiring about continued opioid use and medication disposal, if applicable. Opioid medication consumption was converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Of the 200 patients who were enrolled in the study, 176 patients had sufficient follow-up after undergoing 85 (48%) ACLR, 26 (14.8%) hip labral repair, 34 (19.3%) shoulder labral repair, 18 (10.2%) meniscectomy, and 13 (7.4%) meniscal repair procedures. Mean age was 26.1 years (SD, 7.38); surgeons prescribed a mean of 26.6 pills whereas patients reported consuming a mean of 15.5 pills. The mean MME consumption in the 14 days after each procedure was calculated: ACLR (95.7; 44% of prescription), hip labral repair (84.8; 37%), shoulder labral repair (57.2; 35%), meniscectomy (18.4; 27%), and meniscal repair (32.1; 42%). This corresponded to approximately 39% of the total opioid prescription being utilized across all procedures. Mean MME consumption was greatest on postoperative day 1 in hip, shoulder, and meniscal procedures and on postoperative day 2 in ACLR. Only 7.04% of patients reported continued opioid use in the third postoperative week. Patients had a mean of 11 unused pills or 77.7 MMEs remaining. Of the patients with remaining medication, 24.7% intended to keep their medication for future use. The results of our study indicate that patients who undergo the aforementioned arthroscopic procedures consume <75 MMEs in the 2-week postoperative period, translating into a mean of 10 to 15 pills consumed. Approximately 60% of total opioids prescribed went unused, and one-fourth of patients intended to keep their remaining medication for future usage. We have provided general prescribing guidelines and recommend that surgeons carefully consider customizing their opioid prescriptions on the basis of procedure site to balance optimal postoperative analgesia with avoidance of dissemination of excess opioids.