We recall first some known facts on Jones and Kauffman polynomials for links, and on state models for link invariants. We give next an exposition of a recent spin model due to F. Jaeger and which involves Higman-Sims graph. The associated invariant assigns to an oriented link evaluation for a = -τ 5 and z = 1 of its Kauffman polynomial in Dubrovnik form, where τ denotes golden ratio. 1. Introduction. A knot is a simple closed curve in R 3 and a link is a finite union of disjoint knots. We denote by L a link L together with an orientation on each of its components. Two oriented links L, L' are isotopic, and we write L' « L, if there exists a family (Φt)o<t< of homeomorphism s of R3 such that map [0, 1] —• R3 sending t to φt(x) is continuous for each x e R3 and such that φo = id, φ\(L) = L 1, where last equation indicates that orientations correspond via φ. Links considered here are always assumed to be tame, namely isotopic to links made of smoothly embedded curves. A Ω-valued invariant for oriented links is a map L »-• I(L) which associates to each oriented link L in R3 an element I(L) of some ring Ω, for example C or a ring of Laurent polynomials, in such a way that I(Lf) = I(L) whenever Lf « L. Classically, one of most studied example of link invariant is Alexander-Conway polynomial Δ(L) e Z[t±ι] defined by J. W. Alexander in 1928 [Ale], with a normalization made precise by J. H. Conway in 1969 [Con]; notation (L rather than L) indicates that, at least for knots, Δ(L) does not depend on choice of an orientation on knot. The polynomial invariant L —• Δ(L) is well understood in terms of standard algebraic topology (homology of the infinite cyclic covering of complement of L in R 3) see e.g. [Rha], [Rol] or [BuZ]. The subject entered a new era in 1984 [Jol] with discovery of Jones polynomial V(L) e Z[t±ι/2]. This was starting point of several other invariants, including Kauffman polynomial