Higher Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Research Articles

Sintilimab (anti-PD-1 antibody) plus chidamide (histone deacetylase inhibitor) in relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma (SCENT): a phase Ib/II study.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies are a favorable treatment for relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer T cell lymphoma (RR-ENKTL), however, the complete response (CR) rate and the duration of response (DOR) need to be improved. This phase 1b/2 study investigated the safety and efficacy of sintilimab, a fully human anti-PD-1 antibody, plus chidamide, an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor in 38 patients with RR-ENKTL. Expected objective response rate (ORR) of combination treatment was 80%. Patients received escalating doses of chidamide, administered concomitantly with fixed-dose sintilimab in 21-days cycles up to 12 months. No dose-limiting events were observed, RP2D of chidamide was 30 mg twice a week. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled in phase 2. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 37), overall response rate was 59.5% with a complete remission rate of 48.6%. The median DOR, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 25.3, 23.2, and 32.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (28.9%) and thrombocytopenia (10.5%), immune-related AEs were reported in 18 (47.3%) patients. Exploratory biomarker assessment suggested that a combination of dynamic plasma ctDNA and EBV-DNA played a vital prognostic role. STAT3 mutation shows an unfavorable prognosis. Although outcome of anticipate ORR was not achieved, sintilimab plus chidamide was shown to have a manageable safety profile and yielded encouraging CR rate and DOR in RR-ENKTL for the first time. It is a promising therapeutic option for this population.

Toripalimab Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.

This phase II, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus bevacizumab in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment-naïve patients with advanced HCC received toripalimab 240 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability, and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Fifty-four patients were enrolled between Apr 17, 2020 and Dec 11, 2020. As assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5-45.6] and the lower bound of the 95% CI was above the pre-specified boundary of 10%. The independent review committee (IRC) assessed ORR according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) was 46.3% (95% CI, 32.6-60.4). The median progression-free survival were 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.0) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-not evaluable) assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 and IRC according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the 12- and 24-month OS rates were 77.3% and 63.5%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 27 patients (50.0%). The most common TEAEs were proteinuria (59.3%), hypertension (38.9%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (33.3%), amylase increased (29.6%), platelet count decreased (27.8%), and bilirubin increased (27.8%). Toripalimab plus bevacizumab showed a favorable efficacy and safety profile, supporting further studies of this combination regimen as a first-line treatment of advanced HCC.

Camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II trial

BackgroundClassical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease, while novel therapy is needed for refractory or relapsed (R/R) patients. This phase II trial aimed to evaluate the role of camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in R/R cHL patients.MethodsTransplant-eligible patients with R/R cHL were enrolled and received two 14-day cycles of camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) and two 28-day cycles of camrelizumab 200 mg IV, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15. Patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease received an additional cycle of combination therapy. Those who achieved complete response (CR) or PR proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary endpoint was the CR rate at the end of protocol therapy before ASCT.ResultsForty-two patients were enrolled. At the end of protocol therapy, the objective response rate and CR rate were 94.9% (37/39) and 69.2% (27/39) in the evaluable set, and 88.1% (37/42) and 64.3% (27/42) in the full analysis set, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (69.0%) proceeded to ASCT, and 4 of 5 patients with PR achieved CR after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 20.7 months, the 12-month progression-free survival rate was 96.6% and the 12-month overall survival rate was 100%. Grade 3 or higher treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 28.6% of patients (12/42), mainly hematological toxicity.ConclusionsCamrelizumab combined with GEMOX constitutes an effective salvage therapy for R/R cHL, proving to be relatively well-tolerated and facilitating ASCT in most patients, thus promoting sustained remission.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04239170. Registered on January 1, 2020.

Anti-PD-1 Antibody (Sintilimab) Plus Decitabine As First Line Treatment for Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): Primary Results from a Single-Arm,Open-Label,Phase II Study

Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the preferred treatment for untreated patients with higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). However, the survival rate of patients after HMA treatment remains poor. Studies have shown that HMAs upregulate the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in MDS patients, making the combination of HMAs with PD-1 antibodies a compelling approach for MDS treatment. Consequently, we conducted this single-arm, open-label clinical trial (ChiCTR2100044393) to assess the safety and efficacy of sintilimab in combination with decitabine for patients with higher-risk MDS. Methods: Adult patients with higher-risk MDS, according to the IPSS-R, were eligible for enrollment in this study. The treatment regimen consisted of daily intravenous administration of decitabine at a dose of 20mg/m 2 for 5 consecutive days, along with intravenous administration of sintilimab at 200mg on the first and 22nd day of a 42-day treatment cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other protocol-defined reasons, with a maximum of 8 cycles allowed. The primary endpoint of this study was the overall response rate (ORR). To determine the sample size, we utilized Simon's optimal two-stage design. Secondary endpoints included the assessment of safety and various survival outcomes. Additionally, we investigated the relationship between the expression levels of immune checkpoints and the efficacy of the combination therapy and other potential biomarkers through genomic profiling. Results: As of the data cut-off on June 16, 2023, 53 patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up time of 14 months, and 52 patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 19-83), other characteristics were summarized in Table 1.The ORR was 76.9%, and 15 patients achieved complete response (CR), 13 marrow complete response(mCR),7 mCR+ hematologic improvement(HI), and 5 HI. Among the 40 responders, six patients (4 with CR and 2 with mCR) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival (OS) has not reached, and the median event-free survival (EFS) was 16 months. The 24-month OS and EFS rates were 54.8% (95%CI: 39.5-76.2) and 46.2% (95%CI: 31.2-68.3), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in 10% or more of the patients were febrile neutropenia (67.9%) and pulmonary infection (20.8%). A total of 17 patients (32.1%) experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with the most common irAEs being rash (17.0%), thyroid dysfunction (9.4%), and pneumonia (7.5%), all resolved after glucocorticoid treatment. Regarding genetic mutations, the most frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (34.0%), RUNX1 (30.2%), TET2 (17.0%), and U2AF1 (17.0%). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy with sintilimab and decitabine in previously untreated patients with higher-risk MDS. This regimen showed an encouraging anti-tumor activity with a manageable safety profile.

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in treating anemia patients with dialysis-dependent (DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods We comprehensively searched 5 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating roxadustat for anemia in DD-CKD patients. RevMan 5.0 was used to extract and synthesize data for meta-analysis. Results Ten different RCTs (9 studies) and 5698 DD-CKD patients with anemia were included. Our findings revealed that when compared to the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group, the roxadustat group showed increased hemoglobin levels [MD (Mean Difference) 0.25 g/dL (95%CI 0.14 g/dL to 0.36 g/dL), p < 0.00001] and improved iron-utilization by increasing serum iron [MD 1.85 µmol/L], total iron binding capacity [MD 35.73 µg/dL], transferrin saturation [MD 1.19%], and transferrin level [MD 0.40 g/L]. In addition, we found that roxadustat significantly decreased the low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [MD −0.39 mmol/L] and total cholesterol [MD −0.6 mmol/L]. In patients with a C-reactive protein level that exceeds the upper limit of the normal range, hemoglobin levels were higher for roxadustat than for ESAs [MD 0.39 g/dL]. Treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiovascular events were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The hemoglobin levels of DD-CKD patients were significantly increased and not affected by the inflammatory state after roxadustat treatment. Roxadustat also improved iron utilization, and it was not associated with higher treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiovascular events when compared to ESAs.

Safety and Efficacy of Combination SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Amubarvimab Plus Romlusevimab in Nonhospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

Development of safe and effective SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics is a high priority. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab are noncompeting anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies with an extended half-life. To assess the safety and efficacy of amubarvimab plus romlusevimab. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 platform trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04518410). Nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the United States, Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, Argentina, and the Philippines. Adults within 10 days onset of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection who are at high risk for clinical progression. Combination of monoclonal antibodies amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 symptoms, safety, and progression to hospitalization or death. Eight-hundred and seven participants who initiated the study intervention were included in the phase 3 analysis. Median age was 49 years (quartiles, 39 to 58); 51% were female, 18% were Black, and 50% were Hispanic or Latino. Median time from symptom onset at study entry was 6 days (quartiles, 4 to 7). Hospitalizations and/or death occurred in 9 (2.3%) participants in the amubarvimab plus romlusevimab group compared with 44 (10.7%) in the placebo group, with an estimated 79% reduction in events (P<0.001). This reduction was similar between participants with 5 or less and more than 5 days of symptoms at study entry. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events through day 28 were seen less frequently among participants randomly assigned to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab (7.3%) than placebo (16.1%) (P<0.001), with no severe infusion reactions or drug-related serious adverse events. The study population was mostly unvaccinated against COVID-19 and enrolled before the spread of Omicron variants and subvariants. Amubarvimab plus romlusevimab was safe and significantly reduced the risk for hospitalization and/or death among nonhospitalized adults with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection at high risk for progression to severe disease. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar compared with reference bevacizumab in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A retrospective study.

Bevacizumab has played an important role in the systemic treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without gene mutation. In recent years, bevacizumab biosimilar has received marketing approval based on the results of phase III clinical studies. However, more clinical data are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar in clinical application. We identified 946 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were treated with bevacizumab biosimilar or bevacizumab from January 1, 2019 to November 30, 2021. Comparisons and statistical analyses of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab were made in terms of efficacy and safety. Efficacy evaluation was performed directly in accordance with RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 28.9% in the biosimilar group (n=551) and 30.9% in the reference group (n=395; unstratified ORR risk ratio: 0.934, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-1.138; unstratified ORR risk difference: -0.020, 95% CI: -0.118-0.035). The estimated median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 6.27 (95% CI: 5.53-7.01) and 4.93 (95% CI: 4.24-5.62) months in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (P=0.296). The number of treatment lines, combined treatment regimens and with or without radiotherapy were significant factors affecting the PFS of both groups (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.039). Different genetic mutations and dose intensity were not the main factors affecting PFS (P=0.627, P=0.946). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 76.41% in the biosimilar group and 71.65% in the reference group (P=0.098). The incidences of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 22.14% and 19.49% in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (P=0.324). Bevacizumab biosimilar is equivalent in efficacy to bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC. It showed acceptable toxicity profile and no new adverse events. Patients who were excluded by clinical trials can also benefit from bevacizumab biosimilar.

Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis. MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting. 195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6-26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%]). Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia. Sierra Oncology.

Safety and microbiological activity of phage therapy in persons with cystic fibrosis colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa: study protocol for a phase 1b/2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundBacteriophages (phages) are a promising anti-infective option for human disease. Major gaps remain in understanding their potential utility.MethodsThis is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of a single dose of intravenous phage in approximately 72 clinically stable adult cystic fibrosis volunteers recruited from up to 20 US sites with Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway colonization. The single dose of phage consists of a mixture of four anti-pseudomonal phages. Six sentinel participants will be sequentially enrolled with dose escalation of the phage mixture by one log10 beginning with 4 × 107 plaque-forming units in an unblinded stage 1. If no serious adverse events related to the study product are identified, the trial will proceed to a double-blinded stage 2. In stage 2a, 32 participants will be randomly assigned to one of three phage dosages or placebo in a 1:1:1:1 allocation. An interim analysis will be performed to determine the phage dosage with the most favorable safety and microbiological activity profile to inform phage dosing in stage 2b. During stage 2b, up to 32 additional volunteers will be randomized 1:1 to the phage or placebo arm. Primary outcomes include (1) the number of grade 2 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events, (2) change in log10P. aeruginosa total colony counts in sputum, and (3) the probability of a randomly selected subject having a more favorable outcome ranking if assigned to receive phage therapy versus placebo. Exploratory outcomes include (1) sputum and serum phage pharmacokinetics, (2) the impact of phage on lung function, (3) the proportion of P. aeruginosa isolates susceptible to the phage mixture before and after study product administration, and (4) changes in quality of life.DiscussionThis trial will investigate the activity of phages in reducing P. aeruginosa colony counts and provide insights into the safety profile of phage therapy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05453578. Registered on 12 July 2022.

Trifluridine–tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive therapy (SOLSTICE): a randomised, open-label phase 3 study

Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab has shown efficacy in previous phase 2 studies including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. We aimed to investigate first-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer ineligible for intensive treatment. In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 study, we enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer, ineligible for full-dose doublet or triplet chemotherapy and curative resection across 25 countries and regions. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab or capecitabine plus bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity using an interactive web response system, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), primary tumour location (right vs left colon), and the main reason for not being a candidate for intensive therapy (clinical condition vs non-clinical condition). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to radiological progression or death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients having taken at least one dose of the study drug. The trial is ongoing, findings presented here are those of the primary analysis of progression-free survival, conducted after 629 events had occurred. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03869892. Between March 21, 2019, and Sept 14, 2020, 856 patients (54% male, 46% female) were randomly assigned to trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab (n=426) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (n=430). After a median follow-up of 16·6 months (95% CI 16·5-17·1), the hazard ratio for progression-free survival for trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine plus bevacizumab was 0·87 (0·75-1·02; p=0·0464; protocol-defined significance level of p=0·021 not met). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9·4 months (95% CI 9·1-10·9) with trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus 9·3 months (8·9-9·8) with capecitabine plus bevacizumab. The most common grade 3 and higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (220 [52%] of 423 patients in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group vs six [1%] of 427 in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group), decreased neutrophil count (78 [18%] vs four [<1%]), anaemia (60 [14%] vs 16 [4%]), and hand-foot syndrome (none vs 61 [15%]). Nine deaths (five in the trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab group and four in the capecitabine plus bevacizumab group) were treatment related. First-line trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab was not superior to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population. As expected, the safety profile differed between the two treatments, but there were no new safety concerns. Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab represents a feasible alternative to capecitabine plus bevacizumab in this population. Servier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.

MYF3001: A Randomized Open Label, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Imetelstat Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients with Intermediate-2 or High-Risk Myelofibrosis Relapsed/Refractory to Janus Kinase Inhibitor

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-threatening myeloproliferative neoplasm. Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) ruxolitinib, pacritinib and fedratinib are the FDA-approved treatment options for MF. Despite benefits reported with ruxolitinib in the frontline setting, a high proportion of patients discontinue treatment (Abdelrahman 2015), and the median overall survival (OS) is 11-16 months (Newberry 2017; Kuykendall 2018; Palandri 2019; Schain 2019; Mascarenhas 2020), highlighting a great unmet need for patients whose disease has relapsed or is non-responsive to JAKi treatment. Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, has shown meaningful clinical improvement in IMbark, a Phase 2 study in patients with intermediate-2 (Int2) or high-risk (HR) MF whose disease has relapsed after or was refractory to JAKi (Mascarenhas JCO 2021; NCT02426086). Treatment with 9.4 mg/kg imetelstat resulted in 32.2% symptom response (total symptom score [TSS] reduction ≥50%) at Week 24 and median OS of 29.9 months with median overall study follow-up of 27.4 months (Figure 1). Dose-dependent inhibition of telomerase with imetelstat resulted in on-target activity that correlated with clinical benefits; including dose-dependent reduction in variant allele frequency (VAF) of MF driver mutations and improvement of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. Furthermore, VAF reduction and BM fibrosis improvement correlated with OS. Imetelstat has an acceptable safety profile, with the most common Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events being thrombocytopenia and neutropenia that were manageable and reversible, with minimal clinical consequences. These Phase 2 efficacy and safety results support continued study of imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg in a Phase 3 randomized controlled study. Study MYF3001 (IMpactMF; NCT04576156) is a Phase 3, randomized (2:1), open label, multicenter study of imetelstat compared with best available therapy (BAT) in ~320 adult patients with Int2 or HR MF whose disease has relapsed after or is refractory to JAKi treatment, who are not candidates for further JAKi treatment, and who are not eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Relapsed and refractory disease will be determined by predefined increases in spleen volume after a period of response and a lack of spleen and/or symptom responses after at least 3 months of JAKi therapy, respectively. Patients will be randomized to receive intravenous imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 21 days or investigator-selected BAT that may include hydroxyurea, thalidomide, interferon, danazol, hypomethylating agents, chemotherapy, or other non-JAKi-containing therapy as appropriate (Figure 2). Hematopoietic stem cell transplant and splenectomy are not permitted as BATs. Eligible patients will have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0-2 and peripheral blood and marrow blast counts <10%. Patients cannot have clinically significant cardiovascular disease, active systemic hepatitis infection, or chronic liver disease unrelated to underlying MF. At randomization, patients will be stratified based on a) Int2 or HR per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System; and b) platelet count at entry (platelets ≥75 and <150 x 109/L vs ≥150 x 109/L). Patients who meet progressive disease criteria and discontinue BAT may be eligible to crossover to imetelstat if they exhibit a ≥25% increase in spleen volume from pretreatment baseline at any time during the study or a palpable increase in splenomegaly following 6 months of BAT, as described in the protocol. The primary endpoint of Study MYF3001 is OS and an interim analysis of safety and efficacy is planned when ~35% of patients planned to be enrolled have died. Secondary endpoints include symptom and spleen response rates at Week 24, progression-free survival, clinical response assessments per modified 2013 International Working Group - Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment criteria, time to and duration of response, reduction in degree of bone marrow fibrosis, safety, pharmacokinetics and patient-reported outcomes. Biomarkers and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones. Approximately 180 sites are planned in North and South America, Europe, Middle East, Australia and Asia. The study is actively enrolling. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Isatuximab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: IKEMA Subgroup Analysis by Prior Transplantation

In the era of highly active novel agents for multiple myeloma (MM), the role, ideal timing, and impact of transplantation on further therapy after relapse remains a matter of debate. The impact of prior transplantation on treatment benefit from monoclonal antibodies in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) is largely unknown. Few Phase 3 studies of monoclonal antibody combinations with proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulatory agents have reported outcomes according to transplantation status. This subgroup analysis examined efficacy and safety in patients from the Phase 3 IKEMA study with and without previous transplantation. IKEMA (NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multinational, parallel-group Phase 3 study that investigated isatuximab (Isa), an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, combined with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd; experimental group) versus Kd (control group) in 302 patients with RRMM and 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to either Isa-Kd or Kd, with stratification by number of prior lines (1 versus more than 1) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage (I or II versus III versus not classified). Treatment was given until progressive disease, unacceptable adverse events, or patient choice. Of the 302 randomized patients in IKEMA, 185 (61.3%) had received a prior transplant, comprising 116 of 179 (64.8%) patients in the Isa-Kd arm and 69 of 123 (56.1%) patients in the Kd arm. After a median follow-up of 20.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 19.15 months with Kd (hazard ratio [HR]=0.60; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.16). After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median PFS in patients without prior transplant was not reached with Isa-Kd versus 18.99 months with Kd (HR=0.44; 99% CI, 0.18-1.05). The overall response rate in patients with prior transplant was 87.9% (Isa-Kd) versus 85.5% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (43.1% versus 29.0%). The overall response rate in patients without prior transplant was 84.1% (Isa-Kd) versus 79.6% (Kd). More patients in the Isa-Kd arm achieved a complete response or better compared with the Kd arm (33.3% versus 25.9%). The minimal residual disease negativity rate was higher with Isa-Kd versus Kd in patients with (31.9% versus 13.0%) and without prior transplantation (25.4% versus 13.0%). In patients with prior transplant, Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with Isa-Kd; however, no increases in serious TEAEs or definitive treatment discontinuations were seen versus Kd. Among patients without prior transplant, serious treatment-related TEAEs were similar, and there were fewer TEAEs leading to definitive discontinuation with Isa-Kd. The most common Grade 3 or higher TEAEs in patients with and without prior transplant were hypertension and pneumonia. For patients who underwent prior transplantation, Isa-Kd is an effective treatment option. Overall, these data demonstrate that Isa-Kd represents a standard of care for patients with RRMM, regardless of prior transplant status.

Effect of Apatinib Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin vs Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Alone on Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

There are substantial unmet therapeutic needs in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC), and novel therapeutic strategies should be explored. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for PROC. The APPROVE trial was performed as an open-label, randomized clinical trial at 11 hospitals in China between March 22, 2018, and November 16, 2020. Patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer who had experienced disease progression during or within 6 months of discontinuing any prior line of treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. This primary analysis was based on data that were current as of January 28, 2021. Patients received PLD alone (40 mg/m2, intravenously, every 4 weeks, for up to 6 cycles) or PLD plus apatinib (250 mg, orally, daily). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1, in the intent-to-treat population. In total, 152 female patients were randomized, with 78 (51.3%) in the apatinib plus PLD group (median age, 54 years; range, 22-76 years) and 74 (48.7%) in the PLD group (median age, 56 years; range, 33-72 years). The median follow-up duration was 8.7 months (IQR, 4.7-14.1 months). The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.8) for treatment with apatinib plus PLD vs 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.8) for PLD (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.71; P < .001). The median overall survival was 23.0 months (95% CI, 18.9 to not reached) with treatment with apatinib plus PLD vs 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.1-23.4) with PLD (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.09). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil counts (11 [14.9%] in the apatinib plus PLD group vs 6 [8.3%] in the PLD group), hypertension (6 [8.1%] vs none), and decreased white blood cell count (5 [6.8%] vs 3 [4.2%]). Two patients receiving treatment with apatinib plus PLD experienced grade 2 fistulas. This randomized clinical trial found that treatment with apatinib plus PLD showed promising efficacy and manageable toxic effects in patients with PROC and may be a new alternative treatment option in this setting. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04348032.

An open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II clinical trial of single-dose [131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine therapy for patients with refractory pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

ObjectiveIn this phase II study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-dose [131I]meta-iodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) therapy in patients with refractory pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).Patients and methodsThis study was designed as an open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II clinical trial. The enrolled patients were administered 7.4 GBq of 131I-mIBG. Its efficacy was evaluated 12 and 24 weeks later, and its safety was monitored continuously until the end of the study. We evaluated the biochemical response rate as the primary endpoint using the one-sided exact binomial test based on the null hypothesis (≤ 5%).ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled in this study, of which 16 were treated. The biochemical response rate (≥ 50% decrease in urinary catecholamines) was 23.5% (90% confidence interval: 8.5–46.1%, p = 0.009). The radiographic response rates, determined with CT/MRI according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and 123I-mIBG scintigraphy were 5.9% (0.3%–25.0%) and 29.4% (12.4%–52.2%), respectively. The most frequent non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, appetite loss, and constipation, which were, together, observed in 15 of 16 patients. Hematologic TEAEs up to grade 3 were observed in 14 of 16 patients. No grade 4 or higher TEAEs were observed. All patients had experienced at least one TEAE, but no fatal or irreversible TEAEs were observed.ConclusionA single dose 131I-mIBG therapy was well tolerated by patients with PPGL, and statistically significantly reduced catecholamine levels compared to the threshold response rate, which may lead to an improved prognosis for these patients.

Initial Results from a Phase 2/3 Study of Recombinant Erwinia Asparaginase (JZP458) in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Who Are Allergic/Hypersensitive to E. coli-Derived Asparaginases

Background: In patients with ALL, inability to receive L-asparaginase therapy due to hypersensitivity is associated with higher relapse risk (Gupta S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020). JZP458 is a recombinant Erwinia asparaginase derived from a novel Pseudomonas fluorescens expression platform to produce a reliable supply of enzyme with minimal immunologic cross-reactivity to E. coli-derived asparaginases. It has an amino acid sequence identical to that of native Erwinia asparaginase and its activity on asparagine is comparable based on in vitro measurements. This report includes initial analyses from the phase 2/3 open-label, multicenter, confirmatory pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety study (NCT04145531) of JZP458 in patients with ALL/LBL who developed hypersensitivity or silent inactivation to a long-acting E. coli-derived asparaginase.Methods: For eligible patients, each remaining course of long-acting E. coli-derived asparaginase was substituted by six doses of intramuscular (IM) JZP458 on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday (M/W/F) schedule. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was evaluated by the proportion of patients with the last 72-hr (primary endpoint) and last 48-hr (key secondary endpoint) nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) level ≥0.1 IU/mL during the first treatment course. Cohort 1a started with 25 mg/m 2 IM JZP458 (M/W/F) and Cohort 1b explored a higher dose of 37.5 mg/m 2 IM M/W/F. A preliminary population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model using Cohort 1a and 1b data predicted that a regimen of 25 mg/m 2 (M/W) and 50 mg/m 2 (F) would be optimal to support M/W/F dosing and Cohort 1c was initiated using this regimen.Results: This initial report (data cutoff of Jan 11, 2021) provides data from 102 study patients enrolled in Cohort 1a (n=33, 51.5% male), 1b (n=53, out of 87 patients enrolled, 62.3% male), and 1c (n=16, out of 52 patients enrolled, 50.0 % male). The median (range) number of courses received in Cohorts 1a, 1b, and 1c as of the data cutoff was 4 (1, 14), 3 (1, 12), and 1 (1, 2), respectively, and 53% of patients were ongoing in treatment. The mean serum asparaginase activity (SAA) levels (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for evaluable patients in Cohorts 1a, 1b, and 1c at 48 hrs were 0.4489 IU/mL (0.3720, 0.5258), 0.8376 IU/mL (0.6813, 0.9939), and 0.5085 IU/mL (0.3261, 0.6908); and at 72 hrs were 0.1543 IU/mL (0.1162, 0.1924), 0.3000IU/mL (0.2269, 0.3730), and 0.3579 IU/mL (0.2184, 0.4974). The proportion of patients achieving NSAA ≥0.1 IU/mL at 48 and 72 hr time points are presented in Table 1. PPK modeling and simulation analysis suggested that JZP458 given IM as 25 mg/m 2 on M/W and 50 mg/m 2 on F was expected to achieve NSAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in 99.8% of patients (95% CI: 99.6%, 100%) at 48 hours and 97.3% of patients (95% CI: 96.5%, 98.0%) at 72 hours.Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of causality, occurred in 73/102 (72%) patients. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are shown in Table 2. These ADRs are consistent with the safety profile observed with other asparaginases.Conclusions: The JZP458 IM dosing regimen of 25 mg/m 2 M and W, and 50 mg/m 2 F demonstrates a positive benefit:risk profile, achieving SAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in >90% of patients studied at both 48- and 72-hrs and a safety profile that is consistent with what has been observed in published literature on asparaginases. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMaese: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Aoki: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zanette: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Silverman: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Choi: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Silverman: Takeda, Servier, Syndax, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member. Rau: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: Spouse is employee and stock holder.

Modakafusp Alfa (TAK-573), an Immunocytokine, Shows Clinical Activity in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma; Updated Results from a First-in-Human Phase 1 Study

Modakafusp Alfa (TAK-573), an Immunocytokine, Shows Clinical Activity in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma; Updated Results from a First-in-Human Phase 1 Study

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar FKB238 Versus Originator Bevacizumab: Results from AVANA, a Phase III Trial in Patients with Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (non-sq-NSCLC)

BackgroundBevacizumab is an antiangiogenic recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor growth. FKB238, a bevacizumab biosimilar, has analytical pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to those of bevacizumab.ObjectiveThis phase III trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with that of bevacizumab in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (non-sq-NSCLC).MethodsThis global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized patients with advanced/recurrent non-sq-NSCLC to receive intravenous infusions of either FKB238 15 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. All patients received intravenous infusions of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the curve 6.0) immediately prior to investigational products for 4–6 cycles. FKB238 and bevacizumab were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease by RECIST version 1.1 or other discontinuation criteria were met. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), including complete and partial response and based on blinded independent central review assessment. Other efficacy determinations included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immunogenicity. Adverse events and severity were reported.ResultsThe ORR for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 731) was 51.6% in the FKB238 arm (N = 364) and 53.7% in the bevacizumab arm (N = 367). The FKB238:bevacizumab ORR ratio (ITT population) was 0.96 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.08), and the difference in ORR (per-protocol set) between FKB238 and bevacizumab was − 0.02 (95% CI − 0.09 to 0.06). Both CIs fell within the prespecified equivalence margins. Estimated median PFS was 7.72 and 7.62 months in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.82–1.16). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for 94.2% and 95.1% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported for 53.6% and 55.5% of patients in the FKB238 and bevacizumab arms, respectively. Serious TEAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and bevacizumab, respectively.ConclusionsEfficacy equivalence was demonstrated between the two drugs, and safety profiles were similar. There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or bevacizumab in patients with non-sq-NSCLC.Trial registration numberNCT02810457.

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX induction chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

The optimal preoperative treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) as multidrug induction chemotherapy regimens in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study, done at 28 centres in Germany, eligible patients were adults (aged 18-75 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and histologically or cytologically confirmed, treatment-naive locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as determined by local multidisciplinary team review. After two cycles of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle), patients without progressive disease or unacceptable adverse events were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either two additional cycles of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group) or four cycles of sequential FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h on day 1 of each 14-day cycle; sequential FOLFIRINOX group). Randomisation was done by the clinical research organisation on request of the trial centre using a permuted block design (block size 2 and 4). Patients, investigators, and study team members were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was surgical conversion rate (complete macroscopic tumour resection) in the randomised population by intention-to-treat analysis, which was assessed by surgical exploration in all patients with at least stable disease after completion of induction chemotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02125136. Between Nov 18, 2014, and April 27, 2018, 168 patients were registered and 130 were randomly assigned to either the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group (64 patients) or the sequential FOLFIRINOX group (66 patients). Surgical exploration after completed induction chemotherapy was done in 40 (63%) of 64 patients in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group and 42 (64%) of 66 patients in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group. 23 patients in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group and 29 in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group had complete macroscopic tumour resection, yielding a surgical conversion rate of 35·9% (95% CI 24·3-48·9) in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group and 43·9% (31·7-56·7) in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group (odds ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·35-1·45]; p=0·38). At a median follow-up of 24·9 months (95% CI 21·8-27·6), median overall survival was 18·5 months (95% CI 14·4-21·5) in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group and 20·7 months (13·9-28·7) in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group (hazard ratio 0·86 [95% CI 0·55-1·36]; p=0·53). All other secondary efficacy endpoints, such as investigator-assessed progression-free survival, radiographic response rate, CA 19-9 response rate, and R0 resection rate, were not significantly different between the two treatment groups except for improved histopathological downstaging in evaluable resection specimens from the sequential FOLFIRINOX group (ypT1/2 stage: 20 [69%] of 29 patients in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group vs four [17%] of 23 patients in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, p=0·0003; ypN0 stage: 15 [52%] of 29 patients in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group vs four [17%] of 23 patients in the nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, p=0·02). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events during induction chemotherapy occurred in 35 (55%) of 64 patients in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group and in 35 (53%) of 66 patients in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group. The most common of which were neutropenia (18 [28%] in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, 16 [24%] in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group), nausea and vomiting (two [3%] in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, eight [12%] in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group), and bile duct obstruction with cholangitis (six [9%] in nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, seven [11%] in the sequential FOLFIRINOX group). No deaths were caused by treatment-related adverse events during the induction chemotherapy phase. Our findings suggest that nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine is similarly active and safe as nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by FOLFIRINOX as multidrug induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Although conversion to resectability was achieved in about a third of patients, additional evidence is required to determine whether this translates into improved overall survival. Celgene.

Phase I study of liposomal irinotecan in patients with metastatic breast cancer: findings from the expansion phase

PurposeMetastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable and is associated with low survival rates. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without active brain metastases (BM).MethodsFollowing the dose escalation phase and determination of recommended phase 2 dose, the expansion phase of this phase I, open-label, non-randomized study, assigned adult women to cohorts based on mBC subtype: cohort 1, hormone receptor +/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2−; cohort 2, triple-negative breast cancer; or cohort 3, any mBC subtype with active BM. Patients received liposomal irinotecan 50 or 70 mg/m2 free base every 2 weeks. Here, we report secondary outcomes including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).ResultsFor non-central nervous system (non-CNS) disease across all cohorts (intent-to-treat population, N = 29), the ORR was 34.5% (95% confidence interval: 17.94–54.33), with a BOR of partial response in 10 patients (34.5%), stable disease in five (17.2%), progressive disease in 10 (34.5%); four patients were unevaluable (13.8%). The ORR for the CNS cohort was 30.0% (95% confidence interval: 6.67–65.25) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were diarrhea (27.6%), nausea (17.2%), fatigue (13.8%), asthenia (10.3%), and hypokalemia (10.3%). Serious treatment-related TEAEs were reported in six patients (20.7%). No treatment-related TEAEs resulted in death.ConclusionsLiposomal irinotecan monotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with mBC, with or without BM. The observed safety profile was consistent with that in previous studies.Clinical trial registration: Trial registration ID NCT01770353.

Management of Adverse Events During Rucaparib Treatment for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Published Studies and Practical Guidance.

The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib is approved as monotherapy in the treatment and maintenance settings for women with relapsed ovarian cancer in the European Union and the United States. We review the safety profile of rucaparib in both settings and provide recommendations for the clinical management of the main adverse events (AEs) that may occur during rucaparib treatment. We searched PubMed and congress proceedings for safety data on oral rucaparib monotherapy (600 mg twice daily) from clinical trials involving patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. AE management guidance was developed from clinical trial protocols, rucaparib prescribing information, oncology association guidelines, and author experience. The most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included gastrointestinal symptoms, asthenia/fatigue, dysgeusia, anemia/decreased hemoglobin, and increased alanine/aspartate aminotransferase. Across clinical trials, 61.8% of patients had one or more grade 3 or higher TEAEs. Clinicians should employ close follow-up for TEAEs, particularly early in treatment, and educate patients about expected TEAEs and methods for their monitoring and management (e.g., antiemetics for nausea/vomiting, transfusions for hematologic TEAEs, or dose interruptions/reductions for moderate/severe TEAEs). Overall, 16.2% of patients discontinued rucaparib due to TEAEs. Management of AEs that may occur during rucaparib treatment is crucial for patients to obtain optimal clinical benefit by remaining on therapy and to avoid their detrimental impact on quality of life.