You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized V1 Apr 20121131 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS, TEMPORAL TRENDS AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF URINARY CONTINENCE ONE YEAR POSTOPERATIVE Jens Hansen, Uwe Michl, Hans Heinzer, Alexander Haese, Thorsten Schlomm, Hartwig Huland, and Markus Graefen Jens HansenJens Hansen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Uwe MichlUwe Michl Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Hans HeinzerHans Heinzer Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Alexander HaeseAlexander Haese Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Thorsten SchlommThorsten Schlomm Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , Hartwig HulandHartwig Huland Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author , and Markus GraefenMarkus Graefen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1240AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Due to an increasing life expectancy, more men at advanced age seem to undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa) in recent years. According to the literature, elderly patients (>70 years) seem to be at higher risk for urinary incontinence (UC) after RP, [Nilsson et al., BJUI 2011] although UC rates after RP have improved over the last years, due to innovations of surgical techniques. [Schlomm et al., Eur Urol 2011] The objective of the current study was to examine UC rates one year after RP in elderly patients in most recent years. METHODS Data of patients treated with RP for clinically localized PCa by five high volume surgeons at a single European tertiary referral center between 01/2006 and 07/2010 were examined. Patients were categorized in two groups according to age (≤70 years vs. >70 years). A validated questionnaire was routinely used 1 year after surgery. UC was defined as use of 0 pads or 1 security pad within 24 hours. Only patients with available questionnaire were included in the analyses. Statistical analyses consisted of descriptive analyses for assessment of temporal trends and of multivariable logistic regression models (MVA) predicting UC one year after RP. RESULTS A number of 3333 men were included in the analyses. Of those, 2997 (89.9%) were ≤70 years and 336 (10.1%) were >70 years. Within the study cohort, the rate of elderly patients treated with RP increased from 7.3% (n=39) in 2006 to 11.8% (n=46) in 2010 (p=0.09). UC rates in patients >70 years increased from 51.3% (n=20) in 2006 and 72.5% (n=50) in 2007 to 89.7% (n=70) in 2009 and 87.0% (n=40) in 2010. Even though, rates for younger patients were higher with 83.7% (n=412), 78.9% (n=532), 93.9% (n=642) and 94.8% (n=327), respectively. In MVA adjusting for BMI, prostate volume, pT stage, Gleason score, and NS, elderly men (>70 years) were less likely (Odds ratio: 0.51, p <0.001) to be continent one year after RP relative to younger men. Men treated in 2010 were 3.7-fold more likely to be continent one year after RP than men treated in 2006 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS An increasing rate of elderly patients undergoing RP for PCa could be observed over the last 5 years. Even if elderly men are still at higher risk of urinary incontinence one year after RP, UC rates in elderly patients improved over time. Anyhow, very good UC rates could be observed. These findings should be considered for treatment decision-making and patient counseling in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCa. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e458 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jens Hansen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Uwe Michl Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Hans Heinzer Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Alexander Haese Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Thorsten Schlomm Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Hartwig Huland Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Markus Graefen Hamburg, Germany More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...