High Risk Of Recurrent Thrombosis Research Articles

Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) is a tool proposed to quantify the risk of clinical manifestations associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and certain cardiovascular risk factors. To validate GAPSS in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Russia. 115 patients with SLE were included in the study, including 51 (44%) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 14 (12%) SLE patients with aPL, and 50 (44%) patients with SLE. There was a history of thrombosis in 58 (50%) out of 115 patients; of them, 14 (24%) had arterial thrombosis, 29 (50%) had venous thrombosis, and 15 (26%) had combined thrombosis. Pregnancy against the background of the disease occurred in 43 women included in the study. Of them, 29 (67%) had obstetric pathology. Patients with thrombosis and obstetric pathology had a GAPSS score of 7.17 ± 5.64 versus 4.48 ± 4.55 without these manifestations (p = 0.0003). There was a significant association between GAPSS levels and thrombosis: patients with thrombosis had a GAPSS of 7.31 ± 5.70, those without thrombosis—4.00 ± 4.81 (p = 0.001). GAPPS values were higher in arterial thrombosis compared to venous thrombosis (10.40 ± 25.30 versus 5.82 ± 5.28, p = 0.01). GAPSS levels ≥ 6 and ≥10 were analyzed to select GAPSS values at which a high risk of recurrent thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology could be indicated. All GAPSS levels had a significant association with clinical manifestations of APS. The quality of GAPSS by ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) for GAPSS of 0.697. GAPSS can be used to assess the risk of recurrence or development of thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology in patients with SLE in the Russian Federation. The GAPSS ≥6 values should be used to stratify patients with SLE into high risk group for recurrence of vascular complications. Further prospective follow-up is needed to confirm the value of GAPSS.

The APSANTICO Study: A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate Antiphospholipid Antibody Profiles in Patients with Thromboembolic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) after COVID-19 Infection and/or Vaccination

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new virus discovered in December 2019 that causes coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and various vaccinations have been developed. The extent to which COVID-19 infections and/or COVID-19 vaccinations alter antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with thromboembolic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remains unclear. Eighty-two patients with confirmed thromboembolic APS were included in this prospective non-interventional trial. Blood parameters including lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin IgG- and IgM-antibodies, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgG- and IgM-antibodies were assessed prior to and after COVID-19 vaccination and/or COVID-19 infection. No increases in aPL in the total study population were detected. In fact, low but significant decreases were observed for anticardiolipin IgG- and anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG-antibodies, while anticardiolipin IgM- and anti-b2-glycoprotein I IgM-antibodies slightly increased only in patients with COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Although the investigated patient group is known to have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis, only one arterial thrombotic event was diagnosed (1.2%, 1/82). This low recurrence rate was probably due to the high vaccination rates prior to infections and a high rate of effective anticoagulation. Our data show that COVID-19 infections and/or vaccinations do not deteriorate the clinical course of anticoagulated thromboembolic APS patients.

Clinical course and treatment of incidentally detected splanchnic vein thrombosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis

BackgroundThe clinical relevance and management of incidental splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) remain poorly defined. ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical course of incidental SVT in comparison with symptomatic SVT and assess the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulant treatment in incidental SVT. MethodsIndividual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials or prospective studies published up to June 2021. Efficacy outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality. The safety outcome was major bleeding. Incidence rate ratios and 95% CIs for incidental vs symptomatic SVT were estimated before and after propensity-score matching. Multivariable Cox models were used considering anticoagulant treatment as a time-varying covariate. ResultsIn total, 493 patients with incidental SVT and 493 propensity-matched patients with symptomatic SVT were analyzed. Patients with incidental SVT were less likely to receive anticoagulant treatment (72.4% vs 83.6%). Incidence rate ratios (95% CI) for major bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality in patients with incidental SVT compared with symptomatic SVT were 1.3 (0.8, 2.2), 2.0 (1.2, 3.3), and 0.5 (0.4, 0.7), respectively. In patients with incidental SVT, anticoagulant therapy was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.71), recurrent VTE (HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.61), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.35). ConclusionPatients with incidental SVT appeared to have a similar risk of major bleeding, a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis, but lower all-cause mortality than patients with symptomatic SVT. Anticoagulant therapy seemed safe and effective in patients with incidental SVT.

Anticoagulation and/or Antiplatelet in Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome with Previous Arterial Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort

Introduction: Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is a prothrombotic autoimmune disease associated with a high risk of arterial thromboembolism (ATE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are inferior treatment in TAPS with ATE, the optimal antithrombotic regimen of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and/or antiplatelet therapy (AP) remains unclear. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of VKA (target (t) international normalized ratio (INR) 2-3), VKA (t INR 2-3) with AP (including dual AP therapy), VKA (t INR >3), VKA (t INR >3) with AP, and AP alone at preventing recurrent thrombotic events in TAPS patients with previous ATE. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult TAPS patients with previous ATE assessed at two academic tertiary care centers in Toronto, Canada between April 1, 2011 to April 1, 2021. Included patients met Sydney criteria for TAPS and had a history of ATE (ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), or systemic embolism (SE)). At participating centers, patients with a thrombotic history suspicious for TAPS were screened for lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin antibodies, and/or anti-beta-2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies (anti-B2GP1) at the discretion of the treating physician. Testing for anti-B2GP1 was only available as a send away test. We excluded patients with a known cardioembolic source for their ATE including atrial fibrillation, patent foramen ovale, mechanical heart valves, Libman-Sacks endocarditis, those with initial ATE associated with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), and those treated with DOAC. Outcomes included both thrombotic and bleeding events. Recurrent thrombosis included both ATE and VTE. ATE included IS, TIA, MI, or SE. Bleeding events were categorized as major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) as defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Outcomes were assessed during the time the particular antithrombotic regimen was used. If a single patient had multiple antithrombotic regimens, they were included in multiple groups for the time they used that particular antithrombotic regimen, defined as antithrombotic trials. Outcomes were calculated as the number of events per 100 patient years by antithrombotic regimen with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using Poisson's exact test. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS. Results: From an initial 891 patients with at least one positive antiphospholipid antibody test, 120 patients met criteria for TAPS and had a previous ATE. 62 patients were excluded for the following reasons: 47 for a cardio-embolic source of ATE, 5 for absence of any follow up, 7 for use of DOAC, and 3 for CAPS in the absence of any other ATE. After exclusions, 58 patients with a total of 89 antithrombotic trials were included in the analysis with a cumulative follow up of 248.4 years. The study population comprised of thirty-one (53.4%) women with a mean age of 51 (Standard Deviation (SD) 12.9) years at the start of their initial antithrombotic trial. Twenty-three (39.7%) patients were known to have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) whereas seven (12.1%) patients had non-SLE autoimmune disorders. Thirty-four (58.6%) patients had baseline hypertension. The baseline characteristics are summarized in table 1. Overall, there were a total of 7 ATE and 1 VTE recurrences with a thrombotic rate of 3.2 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 1.4 to 6.3). The recurrence rates in the VKA (t INR 2-3), VKA (t INR 2-3) with AP, VKA (t INR >3) with AP, and AP alone were 3.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 8.4), 2.6 (95% CI 0.3 to 9.3), 0 (95% CI 0 to 18.8), and 6.8 (0.8 to 24.4) per 100 patient-years respectively. There were a total of 10 MB events including 4 intracranial bleeding (ICB), 1 gastrointestinal bleeding, and 5 other types of MB. ICB occurred in 3 patients on VKA (t INR 2-3) and 1 on VKA (t INR 2-3) with AP. Outcomes are summarized in table 2. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort of 58 patients with TAPS and a previous ATE demonstrated a numerically higher risk of recurrent thrombosis with AP alone and a numerically higher risk of MB with the combination VKA and AP. Study limitations include the small sample size, risk of selection bias, and retrospective design. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm our observations. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Global antiphospholipid syndrome score (GAPSS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Introduction. The Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) is a tool proposed to quantify the risk of clinical manifestations associated with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and certain cardiovascular risk factors.Objective. To validate GAPSS in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Russia.Material and methods. 115 patients with SLE were included in the study, including 51 (44%) patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 14 (12%) – SLE with aPL, and 50 (44%) – SLE.Results. There was a history of thrombosis in 58 (50%) patients with 115, of them 14 (24%) had arterial thrombosis, 29 (50%) – venous, 15 (26%) – combined. Pregnancy against the background of the disease occurred in 43 women included in the study. Of them, 29 (67%) had obstetric pathology. Patients with thrombosis and obstetric pathology had a GAPSS score of 7.17±5.64, versus 4.48±4.55 without these manifestations (p=0.0003). There was a significant association between GAPSS levels and thrombosis – patients with thrombosis had a GAPSS of 7.31±5.70, those without thrombosis – 4.00±4.81 (p=0.001). GAPPS values were higher in arterial thrombosis compared to venous thrombosis (10.40±25.30 versus 5.82±5.28; p=0.01). GAPSS levels ≥6 and ≥10 were analyzed to select GAPSS values at which a high risk of recurrent thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology could be indicated. All GAPSS levels had a significant association with clinical manifestations of APS. The quality of GAPSS by ROC analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) for GAPSS of 0.697.Conclusion. GAPSS can be used to assess the risk of recurrence or development of thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology in patients with SLE in the Russian Federation. The GAPSS ≥6 values should be used to stratify patients with SLE into high risk group for recurrence of vascular complications. Further prospective follow-up is needed to confirm the value of GAPSS.

Bilateral anterior ischemic optical neuropathy against the background of newly diagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome in a young patient

Introduction. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is one of the leading causes of nonarteritic anterior ischemic opticoneuropathy (AION) in young patients. Ocular pathology, often being the earliest and the only manifestation of APS, explains possible difficulties in diagnosis of this thrombophilic condition. Objective – to present a clinical case of bilateral anterior ischemic opticoneuropathy against the background of newly diagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome in a young patient. Materials and Methods. At admission, the patient, born in 1988, was diagnosed with bilateral acute ischemic nonarteritic ION on the basis of visual acuity decrease to 0,7, narrowing of peripheral borders of visual fields concentrically by 10–15°, optic disc edema (ODE) of both eyes and macular edema of the right eye according to ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Laboratory examination revealed thrombocytopenia, antibodies to DNA and cardiolipin in elevated titer, which allowed the diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Local anticoagulant and anticoagulant therapy, systemic administration of antioxidants, antiaggregants, vitamins, as well as preparations, improving microcirculation, were carried out. Results and Discussion. Against the background of treatment visual function restored to 1.0 in the right eye and 0.9 in the left eye, residual ODE edema was diagnosed in both eyes in the upper nasal sector. At follow-up in 2.5 months the morphological parameters of the retina and optic nerve were restored. Conclusion. Thromboocclusive lesions of retinal and optic nerve vessels are an early and sometimes the only manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome. Their presence in young patients requires clinical and laboratory follow-up examination for timely diagnosis of concomitant thrombophilic condition. High risk of recurrent thrombosis of different localization makes it necessary to take antiplatelet agents for a long time.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and vascular liver disease: Eculizumab therapy decreases mortality and thrombotic complications.

A total of 2%-10% of patients with vascular liver disease (VLD) have paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Eculizumab reduces complement-mediated haemolytic activity in PNH. This study was aimed at assessing the impact of eculizumab on VLD outcome. Retrospective cohort of PNH patients, in Valdig registry, who had VLD diagnosed between 1997 and 2019 is considered. Eculizumab was the exposure of interest. Studied outcomes were death, venous thrombosis, bleeding, arterial ischemic event, infection, and liver-related complications. We compared survival and new thrombotic events from PNH/VLD cohort to Envie2 non-PNH cohort. Sixty-two patients (33 women), median age 35 years (28-48) and median follow-up VLD diagnosis 4.7 years (1.2-9.5), were included. Clone size was 80% (70-90), median hemoglobin concentration was 10.0g/dl (8-11), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 736 IU (482-1744). Forty-two patients (68%) had eculizumab; median exposure time was 40.1 [9.3-72.6] months. Mortality was significantly lower in exposed versus nonexposed period: 2.6 versus 8.7 per 100 (PY), incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.29, 95% CI (0.1-0.9), p=.035. Thrombosis recurrence occurred less frequently during the exposure to eculizumab: 0.5 versus 2.8 per 100 PY, IRR 0.22 (0.07-0.64). Other secondary end points (i.e., bleeding, arterial ischemic lesions, infection, and liver complications) were less common during the exposure to eculizumab, although not reaching statistical significance. Six-year thrombosis-free survival was 70%, 95% CI [0.60-0.83] for PNH cohort and 83%, 95% CI [0.70-1.00] for non-PNH Envie 2 patients, (p < .001). In conclusion, patients with PNH and VLD are at higher risk of recurrent thrombosis than non-PNH patients. Eculizumab is significantly associated with a lower mortality and less thrombotic recurrence in patients with PNH and VLD.

Practice patterns and outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant use in myeloproliferative neoplasm patients

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by an increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the historic anticoagulant recommended for use in MPNs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly used in general and cancer populations. However, DOAC safety and efficacy in MPN patients remains unclear. We characterized real-world practice patterns of DOAC use in MPN patients and evaluated thrombosis and bleeding risk. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 133 MPN patients prescribed DOACs for venous thromboembolism (VTE), atrial fibrillation, or arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Practice patterns including duration of anticoagulation, dosing, and concomitant use of antiplatelet/cytoreductive agents, were heterogeneous among MPN patients. The 1-year cumulative incidence of thrombosis and bleeding on DOAC was 5.5% (1.5–9.5%) and 12.3% (6.4–18.2%) respectively. In comparison, reported bleeding rates in MPN patients on DOAC and VKAs are 1–3%. On multivariable analysis, prior history of thrombosis, use of dabigatran or edoxaban, and younger age were significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis, while leukocytosis was associated with a higher risk of bleeding on DOAC. The higher-than-expected bleeding rate found in our study indicates the continued need for rigorous evaluation of DOACs in this population.

Anticoagulant Prescription Patterns for Cancer Associated Thrombosis: New Insights into the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Background:Current guidelines recommend low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) over vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). In recent years, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, these drugs have not been prospectively studied in cancer patients, a population with a high risk of recurrent thrombosis. It is known that certain types of cancer are more thromobogenic than others, further complicating the issue. Despite the lack of data, many providers are using DOACs to treat CAT due to the ease of administration and lower cost compared to LMWH. We sought to analyze prescription patterns of anticoagulants with particular attention to the choice of anticoagulant in relation to cancer type.Methods:Data were obtained from the Explorys (IBM Watson, Inc.) platform, an externally validated, de-identified dataset which pools data from multiple US healthcare organizations. To conserve de-identification, all results are rounded to nearest 10. We created cohorts and analyzed the temporal relationship of anticoagulants prescribed after a diagnosis of cancer. Data available for each cohort included the number of patients treated with an anticoagulant(s) over the past 1 year, 3 years, or “ever” treated. Increased use of an anticoagulant was arbitrarily defined as ≥70% of patients being treated within the past 3 years vs ever treated; decreased use was arbitrarily defined as ≤30%. We included all patients age ≥ 18 with history of malignant neoplastic disease. We defined cancer risk based on the Khorana VTE risk model.Results:The study population comprised 3,231,610 cancer patients. Of these, 59% (n=1,913,190) were classified as having low risk cancers. High risk and very high risk comprised 28% (n=918,960) and 12% (n=399,460), respectively (Table 1). We found 526,290 (16.3%) patients received at least one anticoagulant during the study period. Enoxaparin was the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant regardless of risk category but there was a trend for increased use of DOACs in the low risk cancer types vs high and very high risk cancer types (7.5% vs 2.8% vs 3.5%, respectively p<0.001). Figure 1 shows anticoagulation prescription pattern by prognostic group. Over the past 3 years, there has been an increased use of apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban with decreased use of dalteparin and fondaparinux (Figure 2).Conclusions:The standard treatment recommendation for cancer associated thrombosis remains treatment with LMWH, however, many providers opt for the new oral agents. Despite our data's limitations of anticoagulation crossover and the approximation with regard to time trends, we see a pattern of increased use of DOACs in the cancer population. We note the interesting finding that DOAC use is less common in patients with high or very high risk tumor types which suggests providers are wary of deviating from the standard of care in such patients. [Display omitted] DisclosuresKhorana:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with isolated thrombotic vs. obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundSeveral studies suggested that thrombotic and obstetric antiphospholipid syndromes could be independent identities, but few have systematically compared their clinical characteristics and prognosis.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to identify key differences between thrombotic APS (tAPS) and obstetric APS (oAPS).MethodsThis single-center, prospective study included consecutive patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) receiving treatment at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital during a period from 2013 to 2020.ResultsScreening of the database yielded a total of 244 women with positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL). Among the 105 women with primary APS, 39 (37.14%) had isolated tAPS (ItAPS), 44 (41.90%) had isolated oAPS (IoAPS), and 9 (8.57%) had both tAPS and tAPS+oAPS. In comparison to those with IoAPS, patients with ItAPS had older age (41.92 ± 11.97 vs. 33.16 ± 4.22 years, P < 0.01), higher rate of cardiovascular risk (at least one positive of coronary heart disease, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia) (41.03% vs. 6.82%, P < 0.01), and higher frequency of thrombocytopenia (43.59% vs. 20.45%, P < 0.05). Antibody profiles were generally similar among the groups, but isolated anti-β2GPI positivity was more common in patients with IoAPS (52.27% vs. 17.94% for ItAPS, P = 0.01). Triple aPL positivity was more common in patients with both tAPS and oAPS (66.67% vs. 46.15% for ItAPS vs. 25% for IoAPS, P = 0.022). Blood homocysteine was higher in patients with ItAPS (11.20 vs. 9.90 μmol/L for IoAPS, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in inflammatory markers or complements. Recurrence rate of thrombosis was higher in patients with ItAPS (33.33% vs. 2.27% for IoAPS, P ≤ 0.001) with a mean follow-up of 61 months.ConclusionDespite generally similar antibody and biochemical profiles, patients with ItAPS had much higher risk of recurrent thrombosis than IoAPS, supporting distinct mechanisms of pathogenesis.

Increased risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Results from an international patient-level data meta-analysis.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but their clinical efficacy and safety are not established in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) patients. There is only one randomized controlled trial published while others are still ongoing. Many non-randomized studies have been published in this field with conflicting opinions. We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 2000 until March 2018 regarding APS patients treated with DOACs. We performed a patient-level data meta-analysis to a) estimate the prevalence of recurrent thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs in the literature, and b) identify variables associated with recurrent thrombosis. We identified 47 studies corresponding to 447 APS patients treated with DOACs. Three commercially available DOACs were analyzed: rivaroxaban (n = 290), dabigatran etexilate (n = 144) and apixaban (n = 13). A total of 73 out of 447 patients (16%) experienced a recurrent thrombosis while on DOACs with a mean duration until thrombosis of 12.5 months. Rates of recurrent thromboses were 16.9% and 15% in APS patients receiving either anti-Xa inhibitors or dabigatran respectively. Triple positivity (positivity for all three antiphospholipid antibodies) was associated with a four-fold increased risk of recurrent thrombosis (56% vs 23%; OR = 4.3 [95%CI; 2.3-7.7], p < 0.0001) as well as a higher number of clinical criteria for APS classification. In patients treated with anti-Xa inhibitors, history of arterial thrombosis was associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis (32% vs 14%; OR = 2.8 [95%CI; 1.4-5.7], p = 0.006). In conclusion, DOACs are not effective in all APS patients and should not be used routinely in these patients. Randomized controlled trials assessing clinical efficacy and safety as primary endpoints are underway. In the meantime, a registry of APS patients on DOACs could be proposed to establish in which APS subgroups DOACs would be a safe alternative to warfarin.

The risk of ischaemic stroke in primary antiphospholipid syndrome patients: a prospective study.

The most common neurological manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is ischaemic stroke. Identifying patients with APS at high risk for developing any thrombotic event remains a major challenge. In this study, the aim was to identify predictive factors of ischaemic stroke in a cohort of primary APS (PAPS) patients who presented with new onset symptoms suggestive of acute stroke. This prospective multicentre study included 36 consecutive PAPS patients who presented with new onset symptoms suggestive of an acute stroke. Patients were prospectively followed up for 12 months. In 10 (28%) out of 36 PAPS patients [mean age 41 years (SD 13.4), 70% female], the suspicion of an acute stroke was confirmed by brain magnetic resonance imaging. Sixty per cent of these patients were <50 years old. Eight of the 10 patients had a history of previous venous thrombosis and were receiving vitamin K antagonist (VKA), with international normalized ratio target 2-3; one patient had a history of a previous arterial event receiving treatment with VKA target international normalized ratio 2-3 plus low dose aspirin; and one patient had a history of previous pregnancy morbidity receiving only low dose aspirin. Time in the therapeutic range for patients receiving VKA was 77.7% (SD 6.6%). Hypercholesterolaemia was significantly higher in patients with confirmed stroke compared to those without (P < 0.05). Similarly, a significantly higher rate of anti-β2 glycoprotein-I (β2GPI) antibodies (immunoglobulin G/immunoglobulin M; P < 0.05) and higher adjusted global APS score (aGAPSS) values were found in patients with a confirmed stroke [mean aGAPSS 8.9 (SD 4.7) vs. mean aGAPSS 6.4 (SD 2.5); P < 0.05]. Patients with PAPS, including young patients, have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis despite anticoagulation treatment. A careful risk assessment is mandatory to identify patients at risk for recurrence.

Management of recurrent venous thromboembolism in cancer patients

Cancer is one the most prevalent risk factors in patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism have a higher risk of mortality when compared to patients with cancer without venous thromboembolism and a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis when compared with patients with venous thromboembolism without cancer. This increased risk of recurrence is not only observed after anticoagulant treatment is stopped, but also during anticoagulant treatment. Clinical trials have shown that the use of low molecular weight heparin during the first three to six months after venous thrombosis in patients with cancer is associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrence than the use of vitamin K antagonists and, thus, low molecular weight heparin is currently recommended as the treatment of choice by international guidelines. Unfortunately, the optimal management of recurrent venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant treatment remains poorly defined. In general, patients should firstly be assessed for treatment compliance, for the occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and for the presence of mechanical compression from tumour masses. Possible strategies include switching to a different anticoagulant drug, in particular from vitamin K antagonists to low molecular weight heparin; increasing the dose of the anticoagulant drug; or inserting an inferior vena cava filter. The results of recent registries show that the current approach to cancer patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism in routine clinical practice is highly heterogeneous.

Targeting aspirin in acute disabling ischemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of three large randomized trials.

BackgroundAspirin is of moderate overall benefit for patients with acute disabling ischemic stroke. It is unclear whether functional outcome could be improved after stroke by targeting aspirin to patients with a high risk of recurrent thrombosis or a low risk of haemorrhage.AimsWe aimed to determine whether patients at higher risk of thrombotic events or poor functional outcome, or lower risk of major haemorrhage had a greater absolute risk reduction of poor functional outcome with aspirin than the average patient.MethodsWe used data on individual ischemic stroke patients from three large trials of aspirin vs. placebo in acute ischemic stroke: the first International Stroke Trial (n = 18 372), the Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (n = 20 172) and the Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial (n = 622). We developed and evaluated clinical prediction models for the following: early thrombotic events (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism); early haemorrhagic events (significant intracranial haemorrhage, major extracranial haemorrhage, or haemorrhagic transformation of an infarct); and late poor functional outcome. We calculated the absolute risk reduction of poor functional outcome (death or dependence) at final follow‐up in: quartiles of early thrombotic risk; quartiles of early haemorrhagic risk; and deciles of poor functional outcome risk.ResultsIschemic stroke patients who were older, had lower blood pressure, computerized tomography evidence of infarct or more severe deficits due to stroke had increased risk of thrombotic and haemorrhagic events and poor functional outcome. Prediction models built with all baseline variables (including onset to treatment time) discriminated weakly between patients with and without recurrent thrombotic events (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0·56, 95% CI:0·53–0·59) and haemorrhagic events (0·57, 0·52–0·64), though well between patients with and without poor functional outcome (0·77, 0·76–0·78) in the International Stroke Trial. We found no evidence that the net benefit of aspirin increased with increasing risk of thrombosis, haemorrhage or poor functional outcome in all three trials.ConclusionsUsing simple clinical variables to target aspirin to patients after acute disabling stroke by risk of thrombosis, haemorrhage or poor functional outcome does not lead to greater net clinical benefit. We suggest future risk stratification schemes include new risk factors for thrombosis and intracranial haemorrhage.

Thrombotic risk in the antiphospholipid syndrome.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in patients with persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Patients who are diagnosed with APS are identified to have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis, which can occur despite anticoagulant therapy. The optimal type, intensity, and duration of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of APS remain controversial issues, particularly for arterial thrombosis and recurrent thrombosis. Patients with persistently positive testing for lupus anticoagulant and elevated levels of anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies-known as triple positivity-appear to be at increased risk for thrombosis compared with patients who test positive for a single aPL. Recognizing that patients with APS may potentially have different thrombotic risk profiles may assist clinicians in assessing the risks, benefits, and optimal duration of anticoagulation. Future studies that delineate thrombotic risk in APS and evaluate current and novel anticoagulants as well as nonanticoagulant therapies are required.

SLE and APS

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) represents 15-20% of all SLE cases and is in general associated with a more aggressive disease course and more rapid damage accrual than adult-onset SLE. Disease expression varies according to ethnicity, with more severe disease course in non-Caucasian ethnic groups. The majority of patients with cSLE develop damage within 5-10 years of disease onset, most frequently involving the musculoskeletal, ocular, renal and central nervous systems. Premature atherosclerosis and osteoporosis have become increasingly prevalent comorbidities in cSLE patients. Treatment of cSLE is challenging and is further complicated by an unpredictable disease course, adolescent noncompliance and long requirement for therapy. New therapeutic regimens combining immunosuppressive agents and targeted B-cell depletion often provide improved disease control and follow the oncologic model of remission induction and maintenance therapy. Management of children with SLE must include also prevention of medication side effects on growth, delayed puberty, development and fertility. Optimal management of an adolescent with SLE should take into account also patient’s quality of life, psychosocial development and organization of successful transition from pediatric to adult care. The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterized by thromboembolic events, pregnancy morbidity, hematologic, dermatologic, neurologic and other manifestations in the presence of elevated titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS may occur as an isolated clinical entity (primary APS) or in association with autoimmune diseases, infections and malignancies. Multiple pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed by which aPL may predispose to thrombosis including interaction between aPL and endothelial cells, platelets, monocytes, activation of the complement system, and interaction with the proteins involved in the regulation of the coagulation cascade. Management in all patients with APS include avoidance of additional risk factors for thrombosis. Patients with persistently positive aPL, in particular those with lupus anticoagulants (LA), have a high risk for recurrent thrombosis and should receive long-term anticoagulation with warfarin. The standard treatment in APS patients with venous or non-cerebral arterial thromboembolism consist of oral anticoagulation at a target INR of 2.0-3.0. However, it is essential to individualize treatment according to the presence of additional thrombophilic risk factors and the aPL profile (multiple aPL antibodies, high titers of aCL and/or anti-β2GPI, presence of LA). An improved understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms by which aPL induce thrombosis has suggested some innovative treatments such as new anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs, hydroxychloroquine, statins, complement inhibitors, rituximab and other targeted therapies.

Cardiology patient page. Thrombophilia and hypercoagulability.

The human body normally maintains a careful balance between bleeding and clotting. Blood cells called platelets, proteins in the blood, and the cells lining the blood vessels are closely regulated, so that the body forms blood clots to stop bleeding resulting from injury, but it does not form an unwanted and harmful clot (also called thrombus or thrombosis) in our blood vessels. Thrombosis may cause heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots in the legs (called deep vein thrombosis) or in the lungs (called pulmonary embolism). Thrombophilia is an inherited (genetic) or acquired tendency to develop thrombosis (Table 1). Thrombophilias can cause thrombosis by manufacturing too much clotting protein, making abnormal clotting proteins that are resistant to breakdown, producing too little of proteins that prevent thrombosis, or damaging the walls of the blood vessel. Thrombophilias can cause thrombosis in arteries, veins, or both. View this table: Table 1. Major Types of Thrombophilias The most common thrombophilias include inherited abnormalities of clotting such as factor V Leiden and the …

Prothrombotic Disorders in a Cohort of 25 Patients Undergoing Transplantation: Investigation and Management Implications

BackgroundMany patients referred for intestinal transplantation have a history of thrombosis. We undertook an analysis of transplanted patients to describe the history and frequency of thrombosis, clinical course, and management strategies used. ResultsTwenty-five patients underwent transplantation of intestine containing blocks between 2007 and 2012; 20 of 25 are still alive. Five of 25 patients were transplanted with history of portomesenteric thrombosis, 6 of 25 had experienced loss of venous access due to thrombosis, and 6 of 25 had history of mesenteric ischemia. Pretransplantation, 16 of 25 patients were anticoagulated. Thrombophilia screens identified 3 of 16 patients who were JAK2 positive, 1 of 25 who had antithrombin deficiency, and 1 of 25 who had a factor V Leiden heterozygote. Post-transplantation, of all 16 patients who were anticoagulated pretransplantation and continued postoperatively, 1 of 16 infarcted their small bowel graft and 4 of 16 developed a further venous thrombosis despite anticoagulation. Of the 9 without a previous history of thrombosis, 1 had a pulmonary embolus more than a decade after transplantation and another had an upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with a line. Both were then anticoagulated. Seven of 25 are not anticoagulated, although they are administered antiplatelet prophylaxis. Postoperative bleeding complications of anticoagulation occurred in 3 patients. After a subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1 of those 3 patients, anticoagulation was stopped. The other 2 patients bled during ileal biopsy, and both remain on low molecular weight heparin treatment. ConclusionThose with identifiable thrombophilic tendency and a history of venous or arterial thrombosis are considered to be at high risk for recurrent thrombosis. Those without such a history could be considered low risk. Our practice is to anticoagulate all high-risk individuals before and after transplantation and offer antiplatelet prophylaxis to low-risk patients as the risk of anticoagulation probably outweighs the risk of thrombosis for them. Early input from hematologists is vital in the management of high-risk patients, particularly those who thrombose when anticoagulated.

Antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by venous or arterial thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in patients with persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). Catastrophic APS is the most severe form of APS, which is associated with rapid development of microvascular thrombosis resulting in multiorgan failure in patients with aPLs. Patients with APS and catastrophic APS are recognized to have a high risk of recurrent thrombosis that can occur despite anticoagulant therapy. Although antithrombotic therapy remains the mainstay of treatment, bleeding manifestations can complicate management and contribute to increased morbidity. Patients with persistently elevated aPL levels, particularly those who exhibit positive testing for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-β2GPI antibodies (triple positivity), appear to be at increased risk for thrombosis and pregnancy complications, whereas isolated positivity for aPLs appears to be associated with low risk. Recognizing that patients with APS have different thrombotic risk profiles may assist clinicians in assessing the risks and benefits of anticoagulation. The optimal type, intensity, and duration of anticoagulation in the treatment of APS remain controversial, particularly for arterial thrombosis and recurrent thrombosis. Future studies that delineate thrombotic risk in APS and evaluate current and novel anticoagulants as well as nonanticoagulant therapies are required.

Recurrent pediatric thrombosis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the underlying diseases, thrombus localization, and other risk factors in pediatric patients with recurrent thrombosis in order to obtain a sense of early awareness of the possible recurrences. We retrospectively evaluated both inherited and acquired thrombophilic risk factors in children with recurrent thrombosis that were diagnosed and treated at Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Hematology, Ankara, Turkey. Both congenital and acquired risk factors associated with recurrent thrombosis, and treatment modalities were analyzed in detail. Among 569 children with thrombosis, 32 (5.6%) presented with recurrent thrombosis. Median age at first presentation in these 32 patients [11 women (34.4%) and 21 men (65.6%)] was 132 months. In all, 29 (90.6%) of the 32 patients had an underlying chronic disorder: the most common of which was congenital heart disease [n = 11 (34.4%)]. At presentation intracardiac localization, including the entrance of the inferior and superior vena cava, was observed in 10 of the patients (31.2%). Thrombosis recurred at the same location in 15 (47%) patients and at a different location in 17 (53%). Median time interval between the first and second episode of thrombosis was 6.5 months (range: 1-180 months). Considering both acquired and congenital thrombophilic factors, three (9.3%) patients, four (12.5%) patients, and 14 (43.8%) patients had five, four, and three risk factors, respectively. More than half of the patients had elevated plasma FVIII (>150 IU/dl) and D-dimer (>0.5 mg/ml) levels. Thrombectomy was performed in three patients with organized, chronic intracardiac thrombus. Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) was used more frequently to treat recurrence than the first event (15.6 vs. 28.1%) and consequently the complete resolution rate was higher (40 vs. 77.7%) at the second event. Thrombi partially resolved in 11 of the patients during the initial episode and in 10 patients during recurrence (34 vs. 32%). In all, 29 (87.5%) patients were using prophylaxis at the time of recurrence. [coumadin (n = 16), low molecular weight heparin (n = 12) and aspirin (n = 1)]. In total, four patients (12.5%) died because of their underlying disorders and six (18.7%) developed postthrombotic syndrome during the follow-up. Recurrent thrombosis should be expected, especially in cases with congenital heart disease, incomplete thrombus resolution, and elevated plasma FVIII/D-dimer levels. In the light of this knowledge we suggest aggressive treatment for pediatric patients with a high risk of recurrent thrombosis.