High Risk Of Delayed Graft Function Research Articles

#1103 Delayed initiation or reduced initial dose of calcineurin-inhibitors for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donors after cardiac death, especially expanded criteria donors and those with longer cold ischaemia time, older or with an increased serum creatinine. There is no agreement on the optimal immunosuppressive approach in patients at increased risk of DGF, with strategies including a delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) or initial low dose CNI. Our aim was to evaluate the benefits and harms of delayed initiation of CNI or reduced CNI dose as initial immunosuppression therapy for kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Method We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 07 March 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating early vs delayed initiation of CNI or reduced vs standard initial dose of CNI in kidney transplant (KT) recipients at high risk of DGF. Three authors independently assessed study eligibility, and two assessed the risk of bias, certainty of evidence, extracted the data, and performed the analysis. Results were reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes and as mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB2 and the certainty of the evidence according to GRADE methods. Results Thirteen studies were included (2386 randomized participants). Incidence of DGF (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; I2 = 18%) and acute rejection (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; I2 = 54%) were similar between early and delayed introduction of CNI, as well as between low vs standard dose of CNI (DGF: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.50; I2 = 9%; acute rejection: RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.14; I2 = 58%). There were also no differences in secondary outcomes such as graft function, graft loss, risk of death, or infection. Conclusion In patients at high risk of DGF, the strategy of delaying CNI introduction or starting at a lower dose does not reduce the risk of DGF.

Cold Ischemia Time and Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation: A Paired Kidney Analysis.

We aimed to understand the association between cold ischemia time (CIT) and delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation and the impact of organ pumping on that association. Retrospective cohort study using US registry data. We identified kidney pairs from the same donor where both kidneys were transplanted but had a CIT difference >0 and ≤20 h. We determined the frequency of concordant (both kidneys with/without DGF) or discordant (only 1 kidney DGF) DGF outcomes. Among discordant pairs, we computed unadjusted and adjusted relative risk of DGF associated with longer-CIT status, when then repeated this analysis restricted to pairs where only the longer-CIT kidney was pumped. Among 25 831 kidney pairs included, 71% had concordant DGF outcomes, 16% had only the longer-CIT kidney with DGF, and 13% had only the shorter-CIT kidney with DGF. Among discordant pairs, longer-CIT status was associated with a higher risk of DGF in unadjusted and adjusted models. Among pairs where only the longer-CIT kidney was pumped, longer-CIT kidneys that were pumped had a lower risk of DGF than their contralateral shorter-CIT kidneys that were not pumped regardless of the size of the CIT difference. Most kidney pairs have concordant DGF outcomes regardless of CIT difference, but even small increases in CIT raise the risk of DGF. Organ pumping may mitigate and even overcome the adverse consequences of prolonged CIT on the risk of DGF, but prospective studies are needed to better understand this relationship.

Comprehensive analysis of necroptosis-related genes in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Oxidative stress is the primary cause of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in kidney transplantation, leading to delayed graft function (DGF) and implications on patient health. Necroptosis is believed to play a role in renal IRI. This research presents a comprehensive analysis of necroptosis-related genes and their functional implications in the context of IRI in renal transplantation. The necroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (NR-DEGs) were identified using gene expression data from pre- and post-reperfusion renal biopsies, and consensus clustering analysis was performed to distinguish necroptosis-related clusters. A predictive model for DGF was developed based on the NR-DEGs and patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups. We investigated the differences in functional enrichment and immune infiltration between different clusters and risk groups and further validated them in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Finally, we verified the expression changes of NR-DEGs in an IRI mouse model. Five NR-DEGs were identified and were involved in various biological processes. The renal samples were further stratified into two necroptosis-related clusters (C1 and C2) showing different occurrences of DGF. The predictive model had a reliable performance in identifying patients at higher risk of DGF with the area under the curve as 0.798. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis indicated more abundant proinflammatory cells in the high-risk group, which was also found in C2 cluster with more DGF patients. Validation of NR-DEG in scRNA-seq data further supported their involvement in immune cells. Lastly, the mouse model validated the up-regulation of NR-DEGs after IR and indicated the correlations with kidney function markers. Our research provides valuable insights into the identification and functional characterization of NR-DEGs in the context of renal transplantation and sheds light on their involvement in immune responses and the progression of IRI and DGF.

Patterns in Use and Transplant Outcomes Among Adult Recipients of Kidneys From Deceased Donors With COVID-19

While the COVID-19 pandemic enters a new phase and the proportion of individuals with a previous COVID-19 diagnosis increases, the national patterns in kidney use and medium-term kidney transplant (KT) outcomes among patients receiving kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors remain unknown. To evaluate the patterns in kidney use and KT outcomes among adult recipients of kidneys from deceased donors with active or resolved COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using national US transplant registry data from 35 851 deceased donors (71 334 kidneys) and 45 912 adult patients who received KTs from March 1, 2020, to March 30, 2023. The exposure was donor SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) results, with positive NAT results within 7 days before procurement defined as active COVID-19 and positive NAT results 1 week (>7 days) before procurement defined as resolved COVID-19. Primary outcomes were kidney nonuse, all-cause kidney graft failure, and all-cause patient death. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection (ie, rejection in the first 6 months after KT), transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS), and delayed graft function (DGF). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for kidney nonuse, rejection, and DGF; multivariable linear regression analyses were performed for LOS; and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for graft failure and all-cause death. All models were adjusted for inverse probability treatment weighting. Among 35 851 deceased donors, the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (15.3) years; 22 319 (62.3%) were men and 23 992 (66.9%) were White. Among 45 912 recipients, the mean (SD) age was 54.3 (13.2) years; 27 952 (60.9%) were men and 15 349 (33.4%) were Black. The likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time. Overall, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76) and kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.48) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from COVID-19-negative donors. From 2020 to 2022, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (2020: AOR, 11.26 [95% CI, 2.29-55.38]; 2021: AOR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.58-2.79]; 2022: AOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.28-1.70]) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from donors without COVID-19. Kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors had a higher likelihood of nonuse in 2020 (AOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.26-11.90) and 2021 (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.45) but not in 2022 (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28). In 2023, kidneys from both active COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.75-1.63) and resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80-1.73) were not associated with higher odds of nonuse. No higher risk of graft failure or death was found in patients receiving kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78-1.37]; patient death: AHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.84-1.66]) or resolved COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: AHR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88-1.39]; patient death: AHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.70-1.28]). Donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with longer LOS, higher risk of acute rejection, or higher risk of DGF. In this cohort study, the likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time, and donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with worse KT outcomes within 2 years after transplant. These findings suggest that the use of kidneys from donors with active or resolved COVID-19 is safe in the medium term; further research is needed to assess longer-term transplant outcomes.

A non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 genetic variant is associated with graft failure following kidney transplantation.

Despite current matching efforts to identify optimal donor-recipient pairs for kidney transplantation, alloimmunity remains a major source of late transplant failure. Additional genetic parameters in donor-recipient matching could help improve longterm outcomes. Here, we studied the impact of a non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) polymorphism on allograft failure. We conducted an observational cohort study, analyzing the DNA of 1,271 kidney donor-recipient transplant pairs from a single academic hospital for the MYH9 rs11089788 C>A polymorphism. The associations of the MYH9 genotype with risk of graft failure, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and delayed graft function (DGF) were estimated. A trend was seen in the association between the MYH9 polymorphism in the recipient and graft failure (recessive model, p = 0.056), but not for the MYH9 polymorphism in the donor. The AA-genotype MYH9 polymorphism in recipients was associated with higher risk of DGF (p = 0.03) and BPAR (p = 0.021), although significance was lost after adjusting for covariates (p = 0.15 and p = 0.10, respectively). The combined presence of the MYH9 polymorphism in donor-recipient pairs was associated with poor long-term kidney allograft survival (p = 0.04), in which recipients with an AA genotype receiving a graft with an AA genotype had the worst outcomes. After adjustment, this combined genotype remained significantly associated with 15-year death-censored kidney graft survival (hazard ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.70; p = 0.03). Our results reveal that recipients with an AA-genotype MYH9 polymorphism receiving a donor kidney with an AA genotype have significantly elevated risk of graft failure after kidney transplantation.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors With Acute Kidney Injury: Are the Concerns Justified? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Renal transplantation improves quality of life and prolongs survival in patients with end-stage kidney disease, although challenges exist due to the paucity of suitable donor organs. This has been addressed by expanding the donor pool to include AKI kidneys. We aimed to establish whether transplanting such kidneys had a detrimental effect on graft outcome. The primary aim was to define early outcomes: delayed graft function (DGF) and primary non-function (PNF). The secondary aims were to define the relationship to acute rejection, allograft survival, eGFR and length of hospital stay (LOS). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted on the studies reporting the above outcomes from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. This analysis included 30 studies. There is a higher risk of DGF in the AKI group (OR = 2.20, p < 0.00001). There is no difference in the risk for PNF (OR 0.99, p = 0.98), acute rejection (OR 1.29, p = 0.08), eGFR decline (p = 0.05) and prolonged LOS (p = 0.11). The odds of allograft survival are similar (OR 0.95, p = 0.54). Transplanting kidneys from donors with AKI can lead to satisfactory outcomes. This is an underutilised resource which can address organ demand.

PD31-09 DEVELOPMENT OF EXTREME GRADIENT BOOST (XGBOOST) MACHINE LEARNING MODEL USING AN INSTITUTIONAL PEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANT DATABASE FOR PREDICTION OF DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD31-09 DEVELOPMENT OF EXTREME GRADIENT BOOST (XGBOOST) MACHINE LEARNING MODEL USING AN INSTITUTIONAL PEDIATRIC KIDNEY TRANSPLANT DATABASE FOR PREDICTION OF DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION Jin Kyu (Justin) Kim, Priyank Yadav, Michael Chua, Natasha Brownrigg, Joana Dos Santos, Mandy Rickard, and Armando Lorenzo Jin Kyu (Justin) KimJin Kyu (Justin) Kim More articles by this author , Priyank YadavPriyank Yadav More articles by this author , Michael ChuaMichael Chua More articles by this author , Natasha BrownriggNatasha Brownrigg More articles by this author , Joana Dos SantosJoana Dos Santos More articles by this author , Mandy RickardMandy Rickard More articles by this author , and Armando LorenzoArmando Lorenzo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003324.09AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Delayed graft function (DGF), often defined as need for post-operative dialysis during the first week after kidney transplantation, contributes to both patient outcomes and economic costs. Several attempts have been made to predict DGF in the adult population. However, there remains limited information on predicting DGF in children. Therefore, we aim to create a machine learning model that predicts DGF outcomes in children who undergo kidney transplantation. METHODS: An institutional database of children and adolescents who underwent kidney transplantation was examined. Python 3.9.13 was used for model development. The model was built using an 80:20 train-test split. To avoid model bias for lack of DGF outcome, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique for Nominal and Continuous (SMOTE-NC) was employed, effectively increasing the number of cases of DGF in the dataset in a balanced manner. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XG Boost) was ultimately employed to build our model. Gridsearch was performed to optimize model parameters. RESULTS: A total of 409 patients were included in our analysis. Forty patients had DGF (9.7%). Following SMOTE-NC, the training data generated 295 patients in each group. After training with XG Boost model with Gridsearch parameters, the model had a 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of 93.1% and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve of 91.7%. On evaluation of the confusion matrix, the model had an excellent specificity of 96.0% (71/74) but a rather modest sensitivity of 37.5% (3/8). The deployed model can be found in: https://kimjk4-dgfprediction-app-omaz4b.streamlitapp.com. CONCLUSIONS: The generated model had very high negative predictive value, allowing us to identify patients with high risk of DGF, providing an opportunity for closer monitoring. This novel model is the first attempt at predicting DGF in children undergoing kidney transplantation and holds promise for further development and improvement with additional variables and patient numbers. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e904 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jin Kyu (Justin) Kim More articles by this author Priyank Yadav More articles by this author Michael Chua More articles by this author Natasha Brownrigg More articles by this author Joana Dos Santos More articles by this author Mandy Rickard More articles by this author Armando Lorenzo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Hypothermic Perfusion Modifies the Association Between Anti-LG3 Antibodies and Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Recipients.

We previously reported associations between autoantibodies to the LG3 fragment of perlecan, anti-LG3, and a higher risk of delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we aimed to determine whether some factors that modulate ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) can modify this association. We performed a retrospective cohort study in kidney transplant recipients in 2 university-affiliated centers. In 687 patients, we show that high pre-transplant anti-LG3 are associated with DGF when the kidney is transported on ice (odds ratio (OR): 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.00), but not when placed on hypothermic perfusion pump (OR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.43-1.37). In patients with DGF, high pre-transplant anti-LG3 are associated with a higher risk of graft failure (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR): 4.07, 95% CI: 1.80, 9.22), while this was not the case in patients with immediate graft function (SHR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.19, 1.29). High anti-LG3 levels are associated with a higher risk of DGF in kidneys exposed to cold storage, but not when hypothermic pump perfusion is used. High anti-LG3 are also associated with a higher risk of graft failure in patients who experience DGF, a clinical manifestation of severe IRI.

Effects of Delayed Graft Function on Transplant Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication of kidney transplantation, but its impact on long- and short-term transplant outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies published from 2007 to 2020 investigating the association between DGF and posttransplant outcomes. Forest plots stratified between center studies and registry studies were created with pooled odds ratios. Posttransplant outcomes including graft failure, acute rejection, patient mortality, and kidney function were analyzed. Of the 3422 articles reviewed, 38 papers were included in this meta-analysis. In single-center studies, patients who experienced DGF had increased graft failure (odds ratio [OR] 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-6.17; P < 0.01), acute allograft rejection (OR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.61; P < 0.01), and mortality (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.53-3.50; P < 0.01) at 1-y posttransplant. Registry studies showed increased graft failure (OR 3.66; 95% CI, 3.04-4.40; P < 0.01) and acute rejection (OR 3.24; 95% CI, 1.88-5.59; P < 0.01) but not mortality (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 0.97-5.34; P = 0.06) at 1-y posttransplant. DGF was associated with increased odds of graft failure, acute rejection, and mortality. These results in this meta-analysis could help inform the selection process, treatment, and monitoring of transplanted kidneys at high risk of DGF.

Value of Baseline Post-Transplant MAG3 Renal Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Graft Function

Accurate assessment of renal graft function in the early post-transplant period is crucial, as it influences clinical management and graft prognostication. However, there are limitations in current available modalities. MAG3 scintigraphy could contribute vital information on graft function. This study aimed to determine the predictive value of parameters derived from MAG3 performed within 72 hours post transplant in detecting graft function. Delayed graft function (DGF), which is defined as dialysis requirement within the first week post transplant, is chosen as a surrogate measure of graft function. All renal transplant recipients who underwent MAG3 within 72 hours post transplant from 2017 to 2019 were enrolled. Three MAG3 parameters, renogram grade, tubular injury severity score, and R20:3, were evaluated. A total of 117 patients were enrolled. The overall incidence of DGF was 16.2% with a significantly higher incidence amongst cadaveric graft recipients (53.6%) compared with living graft recipients (4.5%). Renogram grade ≥2, tubular injury severity score ≥4, and R20:3 > 1.31 significantly predicted DGF, P < .05 with high area under the curve for R20:3 of 0.97. Grafts with parameters above the cutoffs also showed significantly worse GFR at 1- and 3-months post-transplant. On multivariate analysis, prolonged cold ischemia time was associated with a higher risk of DGF, odds ratio 1.005 (95% confidence interval 1.003-1.007), P < .05. Baseline MAG3 accurately depicts early graft function and was also predictive of GFR at 1- and 3- months post-transplant. These baseline MAG3 scans could be particularly useful amongst deceased donor graft recipients owing to the higher risk of poor graft function.

P1728FUROSEMIDE STRESS TEST PREDICTS DISCHARGE SERUM CREATININE AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Abstract Background and Aims Acute tubular necrosis is a common complication after kidney transplantation and is closely related to delayed graft function (DGF) and slower graft function recovery after surgery. The furosemide stress test (FST) uses a standardized dose of furosemide to evaluate the integrity of the renal tubule and determine which patients have developed severe tubular damage. We aimed to apply the FST to a sample of incident deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients and describe its association with DGF and serum creatinine (SCr) at discharge. Method Single-center prospective observational study of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients. The FST, a standardized bolus dose of furosemide (1.5 mg/kg) was administered between the 3rd and 5th day after surgery. Patients were excluded if, during that time period, they presented evidence of active bleeding, obstructive uropathy or volume depletion. Urine output (UO) 60 and 120 min after FST was registered. To reduce the risk of hypovolemia, each ml of UO produced for six hours after FST was replaced with 1 ml of normal saline. Results 25 patients were included in the study. Mean 2h FST UO was 1012±570 ml. Demographic and clinical data are summarized in Table 1. Subjects that suffered DGF had a significantly lower 2h FST UO (534 vs 1164 ml; P=0.015). In adjusted linear regression analysis only a 2h FST UO&amp;lt;1000 ml (β=0.906; 95%CI: 0.04-1.772; P=0.041) and DGF (β=1.592; 95%CI: 0.488-2.696; P=0.008) were independent predictors of SCr at discharge (model adjusted for recipient age, cold ischemia time, number of HLA mismatches, donor SCr and donor hypertension). Conclusion Recipients with a 2h FST UO &amp;lt;1000 ml suffered DGF more frequently. FST and DGF were independent predictors of SCr at discharge. A standardized FST could help clinicians distinguish patients with more severe tubular dysfunction and higher risk of DGF.

Predictive Value of Intraoperative Doppler Flowmetry for Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation: A Pilot Study

BackgroundThe delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplantation (KT) is a risk factor for long-term poor graft survival. The pathogenesis is multifactorial but mainly related to an ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, the graft hemodynamics have been recently identified as a key aspect for early DGF risk assessment and potential therapeutic intervention. MethodsA pilot study on 20 single kidney grafts from donor after brain death with intraoperative measurement of graft arterial flowmetry, 30 minutes after reperfusion. Exclusion criteria were grafts with multiple arteries or severe atherosclerosis of the recipient's external iliac artery. ResultsKT recipients with DGF (n = 4, 20%) were homogenous with controls (n = 16) in terms of cold ischemia time, donor age, recipients' hemodynamic parameters, renal artery, and recipients' external iliac artery diameters. Nonetheless, at transplant, the kidney grafts that developed DGF were characterized by a significantly higher renal artery resistive index (DGF vs no-DGF 0.96 ± 0.04 vs 0.77 ± 0.13, P = .02), as well as lower flow extraction rate (24.8% ± 11.8 vs 59.2% ± 21.1, P < .01). ConclusionsIntraoperative arterial graft flowmetry seems to be an effective tool to identify grafts at high risk of DGF

Risk factors for delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation; a potential preventive role for intraoperative thymoglobulin

Introduction: Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with significant adverse outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) including lower graft survival. However, risk factors and potential preventive strategies like intraoperative rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; thymoglobulin) have not yet been fully evaluated. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate DGF risk factors and determine the association of intraoperative rATG with the risk of DGF in deceased donor kidney recipients. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively examined medical records of 163 first time deceased donor kidney transplant recipients at two major kidney transplant centers from 2014 to 2016. All the donors were standard heart-beating, brain death donors. Risk factors for DGF in recipients were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean recipients’ age was 43±13 years and the majority of participants were male (64%). The overall rate of DGF was 27%. Intraoperative rATG was significantly associated with a lower rate of DGF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.33, 95% CI, 0.11-0.95). Intraoperative transfusion (AOR, 3.7, 95% CI, 1.4-9.9) and diabetes mellitus (AOR, 3.7, 95% CI, 1.5-8.9) were significantly associated with higher risk of DGF. Conclusion: This study showed that intraoperative blood transfusion and diabetes mellitus were associated with increased risk of DGF. Meanwhile, administration of intraoperative rATG was associated with reduced odds ratio of DGF. Future studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of rATG in DGF-related renal outcomes.

Lymphocyte depletion and risk of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients at increased risk for delayed graft function.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a risk factor for acute rejection (AR) in renal transplant recipients, and KDIGO guidelines suggest use of lymphocyte-depletion induction when DGF is anticipated. We analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN) database to assess the impact of induction immunosuppression on the risk of AR in deceased kidney recipients based on pretransplant risk of DGF using a validated model. Recipients were categorized into 4 groups based upon the induction immunosuppression: (1) Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG); (2) Alemtuzumab (C1H); (3) IL2-receptor antagonists (IL2-RA; basiliximab or daclizumab), and (4) No antibody induction. The primary endpoint for analysis was a composite endpoint of treated AR or graft failure by 1-year posttransplantation. Compared to no antibody induction, rATG and C1H had consistently lower adjusted odds of the composite endpoint across all risk strata for DGF risk, whereas IL2-Ra was associated with increased adjusted odds of the composite endpoint with increasing DGF risk. When the induction agents were compared, rATG and C1H were associated with decreasing adjusted odds for the composite endpoint with increasing risk of DGF, especially at the higher risk spectrum of DGF. Consideration must be given to use of lymphocyte-depletion induction when the anticipated risk of DGF is increased.

Outcomes of EC-MPS combined with low-dose tacrolimus in DCD kidney transplantation for high-risk DGF recipients

Effective use of immunosuppressive agents to avoid the occurrence of nephrotoxicity and rejection in recipients with delayed graft function (DGF) is a concern for physicians. We investigated the outcomes of treatment with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) in combination with a low-dose of tacrolimus (Tac) in renal transplantation for recipients with a high risk of DGF. We conducted a retrospective study of 61 recipients with a high risk of DGF who were treated with EC-MPS and low-dose Tac. The recipients were separated into a no-DGF group and a DGF group, based on whether DGF actually occurred. The results showed that although EC-MPS and Tac doses were similar in both groups, the percentage of recipients whose mycophenolic acid area under the curve 0–12 h (MPA-AUC0–12 h) was below 30 (mg·h)/L was significantly higher and the Tac trough concentration significantly lower in the DGF group one week after transplantation. Notably, a higher incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was found in the DGF group and among all recipients whose MPA-AUC0–12 h was less than 30 (mg·h)/L at one week after transplantation. One-year graft survival, patient survival, allograft function, and the incidence of the most common adverse events were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, the immunosuppressive regime is applicable to Chinese kidney transplant recipients, and early low exposure to EC-MPS was related to acute rejection in the recipients at a high risk of DGF.

Risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients receiving a steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.

AIMTo analyse the risk factors and outcomes of delayed graft function (DGF) in patients receiving a steroid sparing protocol.METHODSFour hundred and twenty-seven recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were studied of which 135 (31.6%) experienced DGF. All patients received monoclonal antibody induction with a tacrolimus based, steroid sparing immunosuppression protocol.RESULTSFive year patient survival was 87.2% and 94.9% in the DGF and primary graft function (PGF) group respectively, P = 0.047. Allograft survival was 77.9% and 90.2% in the DGF and PGF group respectively, P < 0.001. Overall rejection free survival was no different between the DGF and PGF groups with a 1 and 5 year rejection free survival in the DGF group of 77.7% and 67.8% compared with 81.3% and 75.3% in the PGF group, P = 0.19. Patients with DGF who received IL2 receptor antibody induction were at significantly higher risk of rejection in the early post-transplant period than the group with DGF who received alemtuzumab induction. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF were male recipients, recipients of black ethnicity, circulatory death donation, preformed DSA, increasing cold ischaemic time, older donor age and dialysis vintage.CONCLUSIONAlemtuzumab induction may be of benefit in preventing early rejection episodes associated with DGF. Prospective trials are required to determine optimal immunotherapy protocols for patients at high risk of DGF.

The risk of allograft failure and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation are complicated by delayed graft function

Concern about the long-term impact of delayed graft function (DGF) may limit the use of high-risk organs for kidney transplantation. To understand this better, we analyzed 29,598 mate kidney transplants from the same deceased donor where only 1 transplant developed DGF. The DGF associated risk of graft failure was greatest in the first posttransplant year, and in patients with concomitant acute rejection (hazard ratio: 8.22, 95% confidence interval: 4.76-14.21). In contrast, the DGF-associated risk of graft failure after the first posttransplant year in patients without acute rejection was far lower (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.29). In subsequent analysis, recipients of transplants complicated by DGF still derived asurvival benefit when compared with patients who received treatment with dialysis irrespective of donor quality as measured by the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). The difference in the time required to derive a survival benefit was longer in transplants with DGF than in transplants without DGF, and this difference was greatest in recipients of lower quality kidneys (difference: 250-279 days for KDPI 20%-60% vs. 809 days for the KDPI over 80%). Thus, the association of DGF with graft failure isprimarily limited to the first posttransplant year. Transplants complicated by DGF provide a survival benefit compared to treatment with dialysis, but the survival benefit is lower in kidney transplants with lower KDPI. This information may increase acceptance of kidneys at high risk for DGF and inform strategies to minimize the risk of death in the setting of DGF.

Preservation Solutions for Static Cold Storage of Kidney Allografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Static cold storage is the most prevalent method for renal allograft preservation. Several solutions have been designed to counteract the detrimental effects of cold ischemia and reperfusion. The aim of this study was to appraise the evidence for the currently available preservation solutions. We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Transplant Library and trial registries. Inclusion criteria specified any comparative, prospective study for deceased donor renal allografts. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. The primary outcome was delayed graft function (DGF). Fifteen trials with a total of 3584 kidneys were included. Eurocollins was associated with a higher risk of DGF than University of Wisconsin solution (UW) in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) in two RCTs. UW was associated with an equal risk of DGF compared with Celsior in three RCTs and HTK in two RCTs. There was limited data regarding other comparisons and outcomes. The choice of preservation solution has an effect on the incidence of DGF, which might, in turn, affect long-term outcomes. Both UW and HTK have lower rates of DGF than Eurocollins. There is no difference in the incidence of DGF with the use of Celsior, HTK and UW. These findings are supported by registry data.

Associations of pre‐transplant anemia management with post‐transplant delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients

Delayed graft function (DGF) complicates kidney allograft outcomes in the immediate post-transplantation period. We hypothesized that in hemodialysis patients more severe anemia, iron deficiency, the requirement for higher doses of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA), or blood transfusions prior to transplantation are associated with higher risk of DGF. Linking five-yr hemodialysis patient data of a large dialysis organization to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified 11 836 hemodialysis patients. Using logistic regression analyses we examined the association between pre-transplant parameters and post-transplant DGF. Patients were 49 ± 14 (mean ± SD) yr old and included 38% women, 27% blacks, and 26% diabetics. After adjusting for relevant covariates, pre-transplant blood transfusion was associated with 33% higher DGF risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.48); and each 5000 U/wk increase of pre-transplant ESA dose with 5% higher DGF (OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09). Compared to pre-transplant blood hemoglobin of 12-12.99 g/dL, there was 25% higher risk of DGF with blood hemoglobin 10-10.99 g/dL (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01-1.55), whereas blood hemoglobin ≥13 g/dL exhibited 15% higher risk of DGF (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98-1.34). Pre-transplant blood transfusion, higher ESA dose, and either high or low blood hemoglobin but not iron markers are associated with higher risk of DGF.

FTY720 and everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function: results of an exploratory one‐yr multicenter study

This exploratory, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FTY720, as a part of an immunosuppressive regimen, in combination with everolimus and steroids in de novo renal transplant recipients at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Patients received FTY720 (5 mg) and everolimus (4 mg) 2-12 h pre-transplantation, followed by 2.5 mg/d FTY720 and concentration-controlled everolimus (4-8 ng/mL) post-transplant for 12 months. Induction therapy was prohibited. After enrollment of 56 of the planned 200 patients between 2000 and 2002, the recruitment was terminated. The primary endpoint, rate of graft loss, or death at three months was 15.4% and the biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 42.3%. Death or graft loss at 12 months in the DGF and non-DGF arms was 36.0% and 25.9%, respectively. The mean estimated creatinine clearance at three months was 63 and 55 mL/min in the non-DGF and DGF groups, respectively, while at 12 months it was 56 mL/min in both the groups. Although there was no comparator arm, the results from this exploratory study (compared with data from other phases II and III trials) indicated no apparent benefits of FTY720-based regimens for prevention of acute rejection and preservation of renal function in renal transplant recipients at high risk of DGF.