Higher Mean Cumulative Dose Research Articles

Early Evidence of Cardiotoxicity and Tumor Response in Patients with Sarcomas after High Cumulative Dose Doxorubicin Given as a Continuous Infusion.

Background Despite the dose-dependent response rate of sarcomas to doxorubicin, clinicians limit its cumulative dose due to cardiotoxicity. This study evaluates early evidence of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with high-dose doxorubicin given as a continuous infusion. Methods Data was collected on patients who received 90 mg/m2 doxorubicin as a continuous infusion and 10 gm/m2 ifosfamide for up to 6 cycles as part of a phase II study. Cardiotoxicity was assessed with serial echocardiograms or multigated acquisition scans and serum brain natriuretic peptide and troponin levels. Tumor responses were determined by serial radiographic imaging per RECIST. Result Out of the 48 patients enrolled, no patient developed heart failure symptoms; however, 4 out of the 38 (10%) patients with serial left ventricular ejection fraction assessments developed subclinical cardiotoxicity (asymptomatic drop in LVEF ≥ 10%). Twenty-three patients received all six 72-hour cycles of doxorubicin with a mean cumulative dose of 540 mg/m2. Among these patients, 4% (n = 1) developed subclinical cardiotoxicity. In the advanced disease group (n = 39), patients with a complete or partial response received a higher mean cumulative dose than those with stable disease (p < 0.033). Conclusions Doxorubicin cardiotoxicity can be limited by administering doxorubicin as a continuous infusion, allowing higher cumulative dosing to maximize efficacy.

Efficacy and toxicity of q 2 weeks docetaxel versus weekly versus q 3 weeks in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

e16087 Background: Standard treatment for metastatic CRPC is docetaxel 75 mg/m2q3weeks. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated with q 1, 2, or 3 weeks docetaxel regimens at 30, 60 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. The choice of regimen and duration of treatment was decided by their oncologist. Patients who had been in a clinical trial previously, or treated with any other chemotherapy before docetaxel were excluded. On this basis 41 patients were studied. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was used as the primary method to assess response and progression. Response was a decline of &gt;/=50% from baseline value with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression. For patients whose PSA did not decrease, progression was a &gt;/= 25% increase from baseline. If the PSA decreased without reaching response criteria, progression was a &gt;/= 25% increase from nadir. In those who responded, progression was a &gt;/= 50% increase from nadir. The increase had to be at least 5ng/ml. Toxicity was graded on the basis of CTCAE version 4.0. Response rate and toxicity in the 3 arms was compared using a two by two square t-test. Results: There were 12, 14 and 15 patients in the q1w, q2w and q3w arms, respectively. Response rates, mean progression free survival (PFS), median PFS, mean overall survival (OS), median OS, mean cumulative dose (MCD) and toxicity are shown in table 1. Toxicity was similar in the q1w, q2w and q3w arms, except grade 1/2 neuropathy was higher in the q2w arm vs. the q1w arm (p=0.005). Conclusions: The MCD, response rates, PFS and OS in the q1w and q3w arms were similar to previously published reports. Patients in the q2w arm received a statistically significant higher MCD. Our data suggest a better outcome in the q2w arm as compared to the q1w and q3w arms. However, given the small number of patients studied, the results are not statistically significant. Toxicity was similar save for grade1/2 neuropathy. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and toxicity of q 2 weeks versus weekly versus q 3 weeks docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

206 Background: Standard treatment for metastatic CRPC is docetaxel 75 mg/m2q3weeks. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated with q 1, 2, or 3 weeks docetaxel regimens at 30, 60 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. The choice of regimen and duration of treatment was decided by their oncologist. Patients who had been in a clinical trial previously, or treated with any other chemotherapy before docetaxel were excluded. On this basis 41 patients were studied. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) was used as the primary method to assess response and progression. Response was a decline of &gt;/=50% from baseline value with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression. For patients whose PSA did not decrease, progression was a &gt;/= 25% increase from baseline. If the PSA decreased without reaching response criteria, progression was a &gt;/= 25% increase from nadir. In those who responded, progression was a &gt;/= 50% increase from nadir. The increase had to be at least 5ng/ml. Toxicity was graded on the basis of CTCAE version 4.0. Response rate and toxicity in the 3 arms was compared using a two by two square t-test. Results: There were 12, 14, and 15 patients in the q1w, q2w and q3w arms, respectively. Response rates, mean progression free survival (PFS), median PFS, mean overall survival (OS), median OS, mean cumulative dose (MCD) and toxicity are shown in the Table. Three-year OS was 0%, 20%, and 0% in the q1w, q2w, and q3w arms, respectively. Toxicity was similar in the q1w, q2w, and q3w arms, except grade 1/2 neuropathy was higher in the q2w arm vs. the q1w arm (p=0.005). Conclusions: The MCD, response rates, PFS and OS in the q1w and q3w arms were similar to previously published reports. Patients in the q2w arm received a statistically significant higher MCD. Our data suggest a better outcome in the q2w arm as compared to the q1w and q3w arms. However, given the small number of patients studied, the results are not statistically significant. Toxicity was similar save for grade 1/2 neuropathy. [Table: see text]

High disease activity disability burden and smoking predict severe extra-articular manifestations in early rheumatoid arthritis

To identify patients with severe extra-articular RA (ExRA) in an early RA cohort and to investigate potential risk factors. From a cohort (n = 2900) in a structured programme for newly diagnosed RA, 40 patients with severe ExRA after RA diagnosis were identified. Disease activity score (DAS28), functional disability (HAQ) and treatment with glucocorticosteroids (GCs) and DMARDs were assessed regularly. Cases with ExRA were compared with RA controls from the same cohort matched for age, sex and duration of symptoms at inclusion. Patients who developed severe ExRA were more often current smokers and had higher mean DAS28, HAQ and CRP at baseline. Among the ExRA cases, 93% had a positive RF vs 59% of the controls. The area under the curve (AUC) of DAS28 odds ratio (OR) 7.79/S.D.; 95% CI 3.04, 19.95, HAQ (OR 2.30/S.D.; 95% CI 1.37, 3.88) and CRP (OR 3.05/S.D.; 95% CI 1.77, 5.26) during the first 2 years of follow-up were strong predictors of subsequent development of ExRA. The most frequently used DMARDs were MTX and SSZ, with similar frequency and duration of treatment among cases and controls. The cases were treated with GC before onset of ExRA more frequently (73 vs 47%; P = 0.005) and with higher mean cumulative dose (3667 vs 2037 mg, P = 0.015). High levels of disease activity and disability during the first 2 years after RA diagnosis, smoking and RF predict the development of severe extra-articular RA.