High-risk Spine Research Articles

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury in the Setting of Spine Surgery: A Proposed Care Pathway.

This study is a mixed methods approach. Intraoperative spinal cord injury (ISCI) is a challenging complication in spine surgery. Intra-operative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been developed to detect changes in neural function. We report on the first multidisciplinary, international effort through AO Spine and the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute to develop a comprehensive guideline and care pathway for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of ISCI. Three literature reviews were registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42022298841) and performed according to PRISMA guidelines: (1) Definitions, frequency, and risk factors for ISCI, (2) Meta-analysis of the accuracy of IONM for diagnosis of ISCI, (3) Reported management approaches for ISCI and related events. The results were presented in a consensus session to decide the definition of IONM and recommendation of its use in high-risk cases. Based on a literature review of management strategies for ISCI, an intra-operative checklist and overall care pathway was developed by the study team. An operational definition and high-risk patient categories for ISCI were established. The reported incidence of deficits was documented to be higher in intramedullary tumour spine surgery. Multimodality IONM has a high sensitivity and specificity. A guideline recommendation of IONM to be employed for high-risk spine cases was made. The different sections of the intraoperative checklist include surgery, anaesthetic and neurophysiology. The care pathway includes steps (1) initial clinical assessment, (2) pre-operative planning, (3) surgical/anaesthetic planning, (4) intra-operative management, and (5) post-operative management. This is the first evidence based comprehensive guideline and care pathway for ISCI using the GRADE methodology. This will facilitate a reduction in the incidence of ISCI and improved outcomes from this complication. We welcome the wide implementation and validation of these guidelines and care pathways in prospective, multicentre studies.

Assessing performance of Geriatric Surgery Verification Program preoperative communication standards in spine surgery.

To assess performance of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) Program preoperative communication standards in older patients undergoing high risk spine surgery. We performed an external validation of a natural language processing (NLP) method for identifying documentation meeting GSV communication standards. We then applied this method to a retrospective cohort of patients aged 65 and older who underwent spinal fusion procedures between January 2018-December 2020 in a large healthcare system in Massachusetts. Our primary outcome of interest was fulfillment of GSV communication domains: overall health goals, treatment goals, and patient-centered outcomes. Factors associated with the fulfillment of at least one domain were assessed using Poisson regression to adjust for confounding. External validation of the NLP method had a sensitivity of 88.6% and specificity of 99.0%. Our study population included 1294 patients, of whom only 0.8% (n = 10) patients contained documentation of all three GSV domains, and 33.7% (n = 436) had documentation fulfilling at least one GSV domain. The GSV domain with lowest frequency of documentation was overall health goals, with only 35 (2.7%) of patients meeting this requirement. Adjusted analysis suggested that patients with a Charlson comorbidity score of one or more had higher fulfillment of GSV criteria (CCI 1-3: prevalence rate ratio (PRR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.1; CCI >3: PRR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). A paucity of geriatric patients undergoing spine surgery had preoperative documentation consistent with GSV standards. Given that spine surgery is one of the highest risk surgeries in older adults and GSV standards are relevant to all surgical specialties, wider promulgation of these standards is warranted.

Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundEarly palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year.MethodsThis is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0–2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20–30 Gy of radiation in 2–10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05.DiscussionThe results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321. Registered September 9, 2022.Trial statusVersion 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.

Impact of Preoperative Motor Status for the Positive Predictive Value of Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials Alerts in Thoracic Spine Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Prospective multicenter study. To investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in thoracic spine surgery and evaluate the impact of specific factors associated with positive predictive value (PPV). One thousand hundred and fifty-six cases of thoracic spine surgeries were examined by comparing patient backgrounds, disease type, preoperative motor status, and Tc-MEP alert timing. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude decrease of more than 70% from the baseline waveform. Factors were compared according to preoperative motor status and the result of Tc-MEP alerts. Factors that showed significant differences were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall sensitivity was 91.9% and specificity was 88.4%. The PPV was significantly higher in the preoperative motor deficits group than in the preoperative no-motor deficits group for both high-risk (60.3% vs 38.3%) and non-high-risk surgery groups (35.1% vs 12.8%). In multivariate logistic analysis, the significant factors associated with true positive were surgical maneuvers related to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (odds ratio = 11.88; 95% CI: 3.17-44.55), resection of intradural intramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 8.83; 95% CI: 2.89-27), preoperative motor deficit (odds ratio = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.64-7.3) and resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.16-7.8). The significant factor associated with false positive was non-attributable alerts (odds ratio = .28; 95% CI: .09-.85). Surgeons are strongly encouraged to use Tc-MEP in patients with preoperative motor deficits, regardless of whether they are undergoing high-risk spine surgery or not. Knowledge of PPV characteristics will greatly assist in effective Tc-MEP enforcement and minimize neurological complications with appropriate interventions.

Utility and Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Inferior Vena Cava Filter Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery Patients.

Single-center retrospective chart review study. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use for pulmonary embolism (PE) prevention in spine surgery patients. IVC filters can serve an important prophylactic role in preventing PE, though research involving spine surgery patients is sparse. This Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective study assessed the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent spine surgery and received perioperative IVC filters for PE prophylaxis from January 2007 until December 2021. Clinical outcomes centered primarily on the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as complications related to filter placement and retrieval. Thrombi that may have been entrapped by the filters were recorded incidentally on computed tomography or during the filter retrieval procedure. This cohort included 380 spine surgery patients (female 51%/male 49%; median age, 61) who had received perioperative prophylactic IVC filters. The mean dwell time was 6.7 months (1-39mo), with an overall 62% retrieval rate. Retrievals were further categorized by retrieval complexity, with 92% classified as routine and 8% as involving advanced removal techniques, while complications involved 1% (four retrievals) and were all minor. Regarding VTE event occurrence, deep vein thrombi (DVT) were experienced by 11% of patients in the postplacement period, with 1% (n=4) experiencing a PE. There were 11 incidences of thrombi that were found within or near the filters (2.9%). A multivariate analysis further assessed patient characteristics that correlated with the occurrence of PE, DVT, entrapped filter thrombi, advanced technique filter removal, and removal complications. IVC filters in this high-risk spine surgery cohort achieved a relatively low rate of DVT and PE as well as a low complication rate, whereas several patient characteristics were identified that correlated with VTE events and filter retrieval outcomes.

Multidisciplinary conference for complex surgery leads to improved quality and safety.

Complex surgery for adult spinal deformity has high rates of complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Preoperative discussions of high-risk operative spine patients at a multidisciplinary conference may contribute to decreased rates of these adverse outcomes through appropriate patient selection and surgical plan optimization. With this goal, we implemented a high-risk case conference involving orthopedic and neurosurgery spine, anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring neurology, and neurological intensive care. Included in this retrospective review were patients ≥ 18years old meeting one of the following high-risk criteria: 8 + levels fused, osteoporosis with 4 + levels fused, three column osteotomy, anterior revision of the same lumbar level, or planned significant correction for severe myelopathy, scoliosis (> 75˚), or kyphosis (> 75˚). Patients were categorized as Before Conference (BC): surgery before 2/19/2019 or After Conference (AC): surgery after 2/19/2019. Outcome measures include intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations. 263 patients were included (96 AC, 167 BC). AC was older than BC (60.0 vs 54.6, p = 0.025) and had lower BMI (27.1 vs 28.9, p = 0.047), but had similar CCI (3.2 vs 2.9 p = 0.312), and ASA Classification (2.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.790). Surgical characteristics, including levels fused (10.6 vs 10.7, p = 0.839), levels decompressed (1.29 vs 1.25, p = 0.863), 3 column osteotomies (10.4% vs 18.6%, p = 0.080), anterior column release (9.4% vs 12.6%, p = 0.432), and revision cases (53.1% vs 52.4%, p = 0.911) were similar between AC and BC. AC had lower EBL (1.1 vs 1.9L, p < 0.001) and fewer total intraoperative complications (16.7% vs 34.1%, p = 0.002), including fewer dural tears (4.2% vs 12.6%, p = 0.025), delayed extubations (8.3% vs 22.8%%, p = 0.003), and massive blood loss (4.2% vs 13.2%, p = 0.018). Length of stay (LOS) was similar between groups (7.2 vs 8.2days, 0.251). AC had a lower incidence of deep surgical site infections (SSI, 1.0% vs 6.6%, p = 0.038), but a higher rate of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy (18.8% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). Other postoperative complications were similar between groups. AC had lower rates of reoperation at 30 (2.1% vs 8.4%, p = 0.040) and 90days (3.1 vs 12.0%, p = 0.014) and lower readmission rates at 30 (3.1% vs 10.2%, p = 0.038) and 90days (6.3 vs 15.0%, p = 0.035). On logistic regression, AC patients had higher odds of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy and lower odds of delayed extubation, intraoperative RBC, and intraoperative salvage blood. Following implementation of a multidisciplinary high-risk case conference, 30- and 90-day reoperation and readmission rates, intraoperative complications, and postoperative deep SSIs decreased. Hypotensive events requiring vasopressors increased, but did not result in longer LOS or greater readmissions. These associations suggest a multidisciplinary conference may help improve quality and safety for high-risk spine patients. particularly through minimizing complications and optimizing outcomes in complex spine surgery.

Efficacy of D-Wave Monitoring Combined With the Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials in High-Risk Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Retrospective multicenter cohort study. We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery. We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery. There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P = .02). TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

Complex Wound Closure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Complications in High-Risk Patients

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is becoming increasingly prevalent. Soft tissue defects arising from revision closure and impaired healing can predispose to wound complications including dehiscence and infection. Soft tissue coverage with local muscle flaps has been shown to minimize wound complications in high-risk patients. In this study we evaluate the role of complex wound closure in preventing wound complications in high-risk spinal deformity patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent ASD surgery. Patients were stratified into muscle flap advancement (by neurosurgery or plastic surgery) closure versus primary approximation by neurosurgery. Relevant patient and operative factors were collected and summarized using descriptive statistics. Outcomes of interest included wound complication and revision surgery. Ninety-four cases met inclusion criteria including 56 wounds closed by neurosurgery and 38 wounds closed by plastic surgery (PRS). Of the neurosurgery wounds, 31 and 25 were closed by primary approximation and muscular flap advancement, respectively. Patients operated on by PRS were higher risk than all patients operated on only by neurosurgery (P= 0.0037) but were not significantly higher risk than the neurosurgery performed flap cohort (P= 0.4914). In subgroup analysis, despite similar levels of risk, the PRS population experienced lower rates of any wound complication (P= 0.028) and specifically dehiscence (P= 0.029) compared with the neurosurgery performed flap closure cohort. Prophylactic involvement of plastic surgery in ASD surgery wound closure may improve wound outcomes in higher risk patients. A multidisciplinary approach with plastic and spine surgeons may lessen the risk of wound complications in high-risk spine surgeries.

247. Multidisciplinary conference for complex surgery leads to improved quality and safety

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Complex surgery for adult spinal deformity has high rates of complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Multidisciplinary conferences have been shown to improve patient outcomes in many medical specialties but are not currently widespread in spine surgery. Preoperative discussions of high-risk operative spine patients at a multidisciplinary conference may decrease rates of these adverse outcomes through appropriate patient selection and surgical plan optimization. With this goal, we implemented a high-risk case conference involving orthopedic and neurosurgery spine, anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring neurology, and neurological intensive care on 2/19/2019. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> Examine rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations in high-risk spine patients before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary high risk case conference. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Single institution retrospective review. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> This study included 236 surgical adult spinal deformity patients who met one of the following criteria for presentation to the conference: 8+ levels fused, osteoporosis with 4+ levels fused, 3-column osteotomy, anterior revision of the same lumbar level, or severe myelopathy, scoliosis (>75˚), or kyphosis (>75˚) with planned significant correction. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Intra- and postoperative complications and 30- and 90-day readmissions and reoperations. <h3>METHODS</h3> Retrospective review was performed for the patient sample. Patients were categorized as Before Conference (BC): surgery before 2/19/2019 or After Conference (AC): surgery after 2/19/2019. Statistical analysis included independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analysis with significance set at p<0.05. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 236 patients were included (67 AC, 169 BC). AC was older than BC (60.2 vs 54.4, p=0.033), but had similar BMI (27.0 vs 29.0, p=0.061), CCI (3.27 vs 2.92 p=0.266), and ASA classification (2.5 vs 2.6, p=0.911). Surgical characteristics, including levels fused (10.4 vs 10.7, p=0.558), levels decompressed (1.5 vs 1.2, p=0.375), 3-column osteotomies (11.9% vs 18.3%, p=0.232), anterior column release (13.4% vs 12.4%, p=0.834), and revision cases (50.7% vs 52.4%, p=0.821) were similar between AC and BC. AC had lower EBL (1174.0 vs 1850.2, p=0.001), fewer intraoperative complications (17.9% vs 33.7%, p=0.016) and fewer delayed extubations (6.0% vs 22.5%, p=0.003). Length of stay was similar between groups (7.0 vs 8.1, 0.245). AC had a lower incidence of DVT/PE (0% vs 5.9%, p=0.042), but a higher rate of hypotension requiring vasopressor therapy (19.4% vs 4.7%, p=0.002). Other postoperative complications were similar between groups. AC had lower rates of reoperation at 30 (0% vs 8.9%, p=0.012) and 90 days (1.5% vs 12.4%, p=0.009). AC trended toward lower readmission rates at 30 (4.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.133) and 90 days (7.5% vs 15.4%, p=0.104). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Following implementation of a multidisciplinary high-risk case conference, 30- and 90-day reoperation rates and intraoperative complications decreased in the high-risk spine surgery population. Postoperative thromboembolic events decreased. Hypotensive events requiring vasopressors increased, but this did not result in a longer length of stay or greater readmissions. These results demonstrate the important role of this conference in improving quality and safety for high-risk spine patients. Multidisciplinary conferences should be considered to minimize complications and optimize outcomes in complex spine surgery. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

척추 수술에서 수술 중 신경계 감시 장치 활용의 실제와 최신 지견

Neurological complication is of primary concern in spine surgery and has become a critical issue in recent times. The development of postoperative neurological deficits needs to be completely avoided if possible. To improve neurological safety, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to detect and give a chance to reverse the related causes of neurologic complication during spine surgery. Multimodal IONM has the advantage of compensating for the limitations of each individual technique and seems to be effective and accurate for detecting perioperative neurological injury during spine surgery. Spine surgeons are receiving great help in securing neurological safety and preventing neurological complications in high-risk spine surgery by using multimodal IONM during surgery. In this review article, we review recent articles on how IONM is used according to specific types of spine surgery and share the author

Comparison of Plastic Surgeon and Spine Surgeon Closure in Revision Short Segment Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusions.

Retrospective cohort analysis. To compare outcomes of plastic versus spine surgeon wound closure in revision 1 to 4 level thoracolumbar fusions. Plastic surgeons perform layered musculocutaneous flap closures in high-risk spine patients such as revision posterior spinal fusion and complex deformity correction surgeries. Few studies have assessed outcomes of revision fusion performed with plastic surgical closures, particularly in nondeformity thoracolumbar spinal surgery. A retrospective review of 1 to 4 level revision thoracolumbar fusion performed by Orthopedic or Neurosurgical spine surgeons. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics and perioperative outcomes. Patients were divided into two cohorts: wound closures performed by spine surgeons and those closed by plastic surgeons. Outcomes were analyzed before and after propensity score match for prior levels fused, iliac fixation, and levels fused at index surgery. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Three hundred fifty-seven (87.3%) spine surgeon (SS) and 52 (12.7%) plastic surgeon (PS) closures were identified. PS group had significantly higher number of levels fused at index (PS 2.7 ± 1.0 vs. SS 1.8 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) and at prior surgeries (PS 1.8 ± 1.2 vs. SS 1.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.001), and rate of iliac instrumentation (PS 17.3% vs. SS 2.8%, P < 0.001). Plastics closure was an independent risk factor for length of stay > 5 days (odds ratio 2.3) and postoperative seroma formation (odds ratio 7.8). After propensity score match, PS had higher rates of seromas (PS 36.5% vs. SS 3.8%, P < 0.001). There were no differences between PS and SS groups in surgical outcomes, perioperative complication, surgical site infection, seroma requiring aspiration, or return to operating room at all time points until follow-up (P > 0.05 for all). Plastic spinal closure for 1 to 4 level revision posterior thoracolumbar fusions had no advantage in reducing wound complications over spine surgeon closure but increased postoperative seroma formation.Level of Evidence: 4.

Effects of Preoperative Motor Status on Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring for High-risk Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Prospective multicenter observational study. To evaluate transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) baseline characteristics of lower limb muscles and to determine the accuracy of Tc-MEPs monitoring based on preoperative motor status in surgery for high-risk spinal disease. Neurological complications are potentially serious side effects in surgery for high-risk spine disease. Intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) using Tc-MEPs waveforms can be used to identify neurologic deterioration, but cases with preoperative motor deficit tend to have poor waveform derivation. IONM was performed using Tc-MEPs for 949 patients in high-risk spinal surgery. A total of 4454 muscles in the lower extremities were chosen for monitoring. The baseline Tc-MEPs was recorded immediately after exposure of the spine. The derivation rate was defined as muscles detected/muscles prepared for monitoring. A preoperative neurological grade was assigned using the manual muscle test (MMT) score. The 949 patients (mean age 52.5 ± 23.3 yrs, 409 males [43%]) had cervical, thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar lesions at rates of 32%, 40%, 26%, and 13%, respectively. Preoperative severe motor deficit (MMT ≤3) was present in 105 patients (11%), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) was the most common disease in these patients. There were 32 patients (3%) with no detectable waveform in any muscles, and these cases had mostly thoracic lesions. Baseline Tc-MEPs responses were obtained from 3653/4454 muscles (82%). Specificity was significantly lower in the severe motor deficit group. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate, and the abductor hallucis (AH) muscle had the highest derivation rate, including in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. In high-risk spinal surgery, Tc-MEPs collected with multi-channel monitoring had significantly lower specificity in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate and the AH muscle had the highest rate, regardless of the severity of motor deficit preoperatively.Level of Evidence: 3.

Locoregional Flap Closure for High-risk Multilevel Spine Surgery.

Background:Postoperative wound complications pose a challenge to patients undergoing complex spine surgery. Long-term sequelae can be devastating including decreased quality of life, meningitis, prolonged hospital stay, and need for reoperation. Among high-risk patients, postoperative wound complications have been shown to approach 40% in the literature. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for postoperative complications following soft-tissue reconstruction after high-risk spine surgery with the hypothesis that it would result in significantly fewer postoperative wound complications.Methods:A retrospective review of 67 consecutive spine operations at an academic, tertiary care center was performed, evaluating outcomes with a single plastic surgeon in conjunction with the spine surgery team. Data regarding patient demographics, perioperative risk variables, flap type, location of defect, and postoperative outcomes were obtained through retrospective chart review. Complications included soft-tissue complications and a number of reoperations. A bivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of postoperative complication. These data were compared to literature-reported averages.Results:A total of 67 consecutive spinal reconstructive operations were included with a mean follow-up of 11.8 months. Thirty-seven patients (55.2%) underwent immediate reconstruction at the time of the index operation, and 30 (44.8%) underwent delayed reconstruction for secondary wound healing problems following the index operation (in which plastic surgery was not involved). The majority of both immediate (95%, n = 35) and delayed (100%, n = 30) patients was defined as high risk based on literature standards. Patients in this series demonstrated a 7.5% complication rate, compared to 18.7% complication rate in the literature. We did not find a difference between major wound complications in the immediate (8.1%) or delayed (6.7%) reconstructive setting (P > 0.99). There were no specific variables identified that predicted postoperative complications.Conclusion:This study illustrates a postoperative complication rate of 7.5% among patients undergoing paraspinous or locoregional muscle flap closure by plastic surgery, which is significantly lower than that reported in contemporary literature for these high-risk patients.

Impact of a Perioperative Protocol on Length of ICU and Hospital Stay in Complex Spine Surgery.

In an attempt to improve patient care, a perioperative complex spine surgery management protocol was developed through collaboration between spine surgeons and neuroanesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to investigate whether implementation of the protocol in 2015 decreased total hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) and complication rates after elective complex spine surgery. A retrospective cohort study was conducted by review of the medical charts of patients who underwent elective complex spine surgery at an academic medical center between 2012 and 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the date of their spine surgery in relation to implementation of the spine surgery protocol; before-protocol (January 2012 to March 2015) and protocol (April 2015 to March 2017) groups. Outcomes in the 2 groups were compared, focusing on hospital and ICU LOS, and complication rates. A total of 201 patients were included in the study; 107 and 94 in the before-protocol and protocol groups, respectively. Mean (SD) hospital LOS was 14.8±10.8 days in the before-protocol group compared with 10±10.7 days in the protocol group (P<0.001). The spine surgery protocol was the primary factor decreasing hospital LOS; incidence rate ratio 0.78 (P<0.001). Similarly, mean ICU LOS was lower in the protocol compared with before-protocol group (4.2±6.3 vs. 6.3±7.3 d, respectively; P=0.011). There were no significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P=0.231). Implementation of a spine protocol reduced ICU and total hospital LOS stay in high-risk spine surgery patients.

Laboratory Monitoring and Transfusion Guidelines to Influence Care in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Spinal Fusion Surgery

The purpose of this project was to determine whether the use of the modified Northwestern high risk spine protocol in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery would result in improved transfusion practices. Preimplementation and postimplementation design. A laboratory monitoring and transfusion guideline protocol was implemented in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusions. Data were collected via a manual retrospective chart review of the electronic medical record before and after implementation of the protocol. Laboratory values were monitored at guided intervals. There was a statistically significant (P=.004) decrease in the mean hemoglobin value at which a packed red blood cell transfusion was initiated. Through the use of the protocol, laboratory value monitoring provided quantitative data to aid and improve clinical decision making for practitioners in the perioperative period.

The Wisdom of Crowds.

The Wisdom of Crowds.

Motor evoked potentials in 43 high risk spine deformities.

ABSTRACTIntroduction:Correction of pediatric spine deformities is challenging surgical procedures. This fragile group of patients has many risk factors, therefore prevention of most fearing complication-paraplegia is extremely important. Monitoring of transmission of neurophysiological impulses through motor and sensor pathways of spinal cord gives us an insight into cord's function, and predicts postoperative neurological status. Goal: Aim of this work is to present our experiences in monitoring of spinal cord motor function - MEP during surgical corrections of the hardest pediatric spine deformities, pointing on the most dangerous aspects.Material and methods:We analyzed incidence of MEP changes and postoperative neurological status in patients who had major spine correcting surgery in period April ‘11- April ‘14 on our Spine department.Results:Two of 43 patients or 4.6% in our group experienced significant MEP changes during their major spine reconstructive surgeries. We promptly reduced distractive forces, and MEP normalized, and there were no neurological deficit. Neuromonitoring is reliable method which allows us to “catch” early signs of neurological deficits, when they are still in reversible phase. Although IONM cannot provide complete protection of neurological deficit (it reduces risk of paraplegia about 75%), it at least afford a comfort to the surgeon being fear free that his patient is neurologically intact during long lasting procedures.

Protocol Practice in Perioperative Management of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Complex Spine Surgery

The treatment of complex spinal pathology is an often technically challenging endeavor that places a high physiological stress on the patient. While outcomes from successful deformity correction operations across a wide range of ages have demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life, the patient must be medically fit to undergo such a procedure. The Northwestern high-risk spine protocol has been developed in order to thoroughly evaluate and treat patients in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods to optimize outcomes. The use of evidence based, protocol driven management strategies has been shown to improve outcomes in many aspects of medicine. The institution of such a high-risk protocol in complex spinal surgery enables the patient care team to fully assess the risk profile for a given patient and helps guide management, particularly in the setting of physiologically demanding procedures with high complication rates, such as adult deformity correction.

Standardizing Care for High-Risk Patients in Spine Surgery

Review article of current literature on the preoperative evaluation and postoperative management of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and a presentation of a multidisciplinary protocol for patients undergoing high-risk spine operation. To provide evidence-based outline of modifiable risk factors and give an example of a multidisciplinary protocol with the goal of improving outcomes. Protocol-based care has been shown to improve outcomes in many areas of medicine. A protocol to evaluate patients undergoing high-risk procedures may ultimately improve patient outcomes. The English language literature to date was reviewed on modifiable risk factors for spine surgery. A multidisciplinary team including hospitalists, critical care physicians, anesthesiologists, and spine surgeons from neurosurgery and orthopedics established an institutional protocol to provide comprehensive care in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods for patients undergoing high-risk spine operations. An example of a comprehensive pre-, peri-, and postoperative high-risk spine protocol is provided, with focus on the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing high-risk spine operations and modifiable risk factors. Standardizing preoperative risk assessment may lead to better outcomes after major spine operations. A high-risk spine protocol may help patients by having dedicated physicians in multiple specialties focusing on all aspects of a patients care in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases.

Influence of needle type on the incidence of intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injections: a comparison of short-bevel and long-bevel needles

Background context Vascular penetration and injection of corticosteroids into a vessel during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injection is a suspected cause of myelopathy. Blunt needles have been suggested to avoid vascular penetration, but they are difficult to navigate. Another alternative to the standard long-bevel sharp needles is the short-bevel needles. Some have postulated that short-bevel needles are the best option for high-risk spine injections because they maintain navigation characteristics while potentially reducing the risk of complications. To date, no studies have been performed to either confirm or refute this. Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in the incidence of vascular penetration during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections between short-bevel and long-bevel needles. Study design/setting This is a prospective, observational, in vivo study. Patient sample The sample comprises patients receiving lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections at a university-based outpatient spine center. Outcome measure The outcome measure was the incidence of vascular contrast patterns observed under live fluoroscopy. Methods One interventional spine physician recorded contrast patterns observed during 158 fluoroscopically guided lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections under live fluoroscopy using two different types of needle tips. Results Vascular injections were observed in 22 of the 158 injections, for an overall incidence of 13.9%. The incidence of vascular injections in the short-bevel group was 15.6% (10/64) and in the long-bevel group was 12.8% (12/94). This difference was not statistically significant (p=.6447). A secondary analysis was performed to determine if the needle gauge influenced the incidence of vascular injections, and again, there were no statistical differences in the overall rates of vascular injection. Conclusions In comparison with long-bevel needles, short-bevel needles do not reduce the risk of inadvertent vascular injection in lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections.