High-risk PCa Research Articles

AR expression-independent XRCC3 mediates DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation against prostate cancer

BackgroundAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) resistance is closely associated with altered AR status. Aberrant AR expression is critical for the induction of ADT resistance, necessitating the identification of an anti-PCa target independent of AR expression.MethodsTranscriptomic data and clinical information of PRAD were obtained from TCGA database. Genes with PCa-related and AR expression-independent were screened by bioinformatics, and characterized by PPI and GO functional enrichment analyses. Candidate genes were locked by co-expression correlation and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses. A prognostic gene set was established using LASSO Cox regression algorithm. Cox proportional risk regression was performed to identify a key prognostic gene. Expression of the target protein in PCa tissues was verified by The Human Protein Atlas database. In vitro validation of cellular function and molecular mechanism by knockdown and overexpression of the target gene.ResultsTwo AR expression-independent genes (SLC43A1 and XRCC3) were available for the optimal prognostic model. This gene set effectively predicted PRAD patients’ DFS at 1-, 3- and 5-year, where XRCC3 and tumor (T) stage were independent risk factors. XRCC3 was higher expressed in PRAD patients with T3-T4 stages and accompanied by poorer DFS. IHC staining also validated its higher expression in high-risk PCa tissues. In vitro experiments demonstrated that silencing XRCC3 significantly inhibited 22Rv1 and DU145 cell proliferation, migration and invasion, while promoted apoptosis. Further, silencing XRCC3 promoted DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation, which was absent with overexpression.ConclusionSilencing XRCC3 exerts anti-PCa effects by promoting DNA damage-induced p53/Bax signaling pathway activation in an AR expression-independent manner.

A phase II trial of apalutamide for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and molecular correlates.

To determine whether 6 months of preoperative apalutamide for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPCa) reduces the aggregate postoperative radiotherapy risk and to evaluate associations of molecular perturbations with clinical outcomes in this study cohort. Between May 2018 and February 2020, eligible patients with IRPCa (Gleason 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 and clinical T2b-c or prostate-specific antigen level of 10-20 ng/mL) were treated with apalutamide 240 mg/day for 6 months followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in this single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was presence of any adverse pathological feature at risk of pelvic radiation (pathological T stage after neoadjuvant therapy [yp]T3 or ypN1 or positive surgical margins). Translational studies, including germline and somatic DNA alterations and RNA and protein expression, were performed on post-apalutamide RP specimens, and assessed for associations with clinical outcomes. A total of 40 patients underwent a RP, and only one patient discontinued apalutamide prior to 6 months. In all, 40% had adverse pathological features at time of RP, and the 3-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate was 15%, with 27.5% being not evaluable. Genomic alterations frequently seen in metastatic PCas, such as androgen receptor (AR), tumour protein p53 (TP53), phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), or BReast CAncer associated gene (BRCA1/2) were underrepresented in this localised cohort. Adverse pathological features and BCR at 3-years were associated with increased expression of select cell cycle (e.g., E2F targets: adjusted P value [Padj] < 0.001, normalised enrichment score [NES] 2.47) and oxidative phosphorylation (Padj < 0.001, NES 1.62) pathways. Preoperative apalutamide did not reduce the aggregate postoperative radiation risk to the pre-specified threshold in unselected men with IRPCa. However, transcriptomic analysis identified key dysregulated pathways in tumours associated with adverse pathological outcomes and BCR, which warrant future study. Further investigation of preoperative therapy is underway for men with high-risk PCa.

3396: Focal boost SBRT in men with intermediate- and high-risk PCa: 5-year results of the hypo-FLAME trial

3396: Focal boost SBRT in men with intermediate- and high-risk PCa: 5-year results of the hypo-FLAME trial

Abstract 6835: Profiling of new prostate cancer vulnerabilities through single-nucleus RNAseq implicates the CAF-specific TGF-β pathway in tumor progression

Abstract Background: Transcriptomic profiles of primary high grade prostate cancer (hgPCa) have been extensively studied and prognostic gene expression signatures to classify patients for risk have been identified. However, such studies have employed bulk genomic techniques that blur the contributions of the different cell types. Indeed, tumor microenvironment (TME) cells can significantly contribute to these transcriptomic signatures thereby confounding the lineage of potential therapeutic targets. These challenges underscore the potential of single-nucleus (sn)RNAseq to elucidate new PCa vulnerabilities. We set out to assess whether the TME, particularly cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) drive poor outcome in PCa. Methods: We obtained 15 treatment-naïve frozen primary high risk PCa tissue samples, mostly Gleason &amp;gt;=8. A PCa nuclei dissociation protocol was adapted for single nucleus snRNAseq (10X Genomics). Sample profiling included all cell populations in the tissue including tumor and TME. Output was analyzed using Seurat (v.4.1.1), corrected for ambient RNA expression with CellBender (v.0.3.1) and detected and removed doublets with Scds (v.3.9). Tumor cells were distinguished from normal epithelium cells by a combination of inferCNV (v.1.12.0) and supervised learning with random forests classification. Results: Through snRNAseq, we show that CAFs, and not tumor cells, entirely drive the expression of previously validated poor prognostic signatures (Mortensen, 2015). Our analysis revealed that the TGFβ pathway expression, TGF-β1 in particular, is upregulated in CAFs rather than PCa cells. This pathway, along with poor prognosis signatures are selectively elevated in CAFs from patients with Gleason high compared to low, implicating the TGFb axis as a PCa vulnerability. We also derived a snRNAseq CAF signature that differentiates non-responders to immune checkpoint therapy in mCRPC (Nivolumab+Ipilimumab). Furthermore, cluster profiling of tumor nuclei revealed that hgPCa harbors high heterogeneity with distinct niches of hgPC, mCRPC or neuroendocrine phenotypes for each patient. Conclusions: Through snRNAseq we show that CAFs are the main contributors to prior bulk RNAseq classifiers of poor response, resulting in a refined CAF signature that allows for direct investigation of the contribution of CAFs in other patient segments (mCRPC). Our findings point to a hgPCa patient segment with high CAF representation that may benefit from the addition of a CAF targeting agent (ie.TGFbi) to androgen deprivation therapy. This data has the potential to help refine our prognostic classifiers for patient selection and clinical applicability. Further study of the reported tumor heterogeneity will inform rational combination therapies to tackle resistance mechanisms. Citation Format: Alexandre P. Alloy, Sharmila Chamling Rai, Brendan O'Brien, Anna Lyubetskaya, Arnaud Amzallag, Benjamin Chen, Ana Lako. Profiling of new prostate cancer vulnerabilities through single-nucleus RNAseq implicates the CAF-specific TGF-β pathway in tumor progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6835.

O266: Transcriptomic signature from spatially inferred histologically benign ancestral clone predicts high risk prostate cancer

Abstract Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) is a multifocal disease driven by heterogenous spatial and temporal branching evolution of tumour clones. Spatial transcriptomic analysis has revealed, clonally distributed copy number alterations even in histologically benign regions. We aim to evaluate if the genetic signature comprised within these genetically aberrant histologically benign regions, or “ancestral clones” may predict presence of high-risk disease. Methods Fresh-frozen, radical prostatectomy specimen was profiled using the 10x Genomics Visium Spatial Gene Expression platform. Via hierarchical clustering, spatial tumour clonal relations were inferred. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high-grade tumour and histologically benign ancestral clones were identified. DEGs (|log2FC|&amp;gt;0.75) were input into a LASSO regression algorithm with normalised mRNA expression of normal adjacent tissue from the TCGA PCa database to train a genetic risk model to predict presence of high risk PCa (Gleason&amp;gt;8). Derived risk score was validated on an external cohort (GSE21032). Results A total of 683 DEGs were identified. These were enriched for organic acid metabolic pathways. Regression analysis on 57 normal adjacent tissue samples from TCGA PCa dataset was performed to develop a predictive model comprising of 3 genes (SLC22A3, CRIP2, LSAMP). External validation of the genetic risk score on matched histologically benign tissue from 131 patients, had good performance for prediction of high-risk PCa (AUC 0.807; 95% CI 0.693-0.921). Conclusion Our model has good performance for predicting high-risk PCa from matched normal tissue. Developed genetic risk score has translational potential to improve detection of unsampled clinically significant prostate cancer from histologically benign biopsy cores.

Early change in apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and external beam radiation therapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer

To determine the role of serial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a biomarker for response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, institutional review board (IRB)-approved prospective study included 12 patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa patients prior to nADT and EBRT, who underwent serial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at baseline (BL), 8-weeks after nADT initiation (time point [TP]1), 6-weeks into EBRT delivery (TP2), and 6-months after nADT initiation (TP3). Tumour volume (tVOL) and tumour and normal tissue ADC (tADC and nlADC) were determined at all TPs. tADC and nlADC dynamics were correlated with post-treatment PSA using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Paired t-tests compared pre/post-treatment ADC. There was a sequential decrease in PSA at all TPs, reaching their lowest values at TP3 post-treatment completion. Mean tADC increased significantly from baseline to TP1 (917.8±107.7×10-6 versus 1033.8±139.3×10-6 mm2/s; p<0.01), with no subsequent change at TP2 or TP3. Both percentage and absolute change in tADC from BL to TP1 correlated with post-treatment PSA (r=-0.666, r=-0.674; p=0.02). Post-treatment PSA in good responders (<0.1 ng/ml) versus poor responders (≥ 0.1 ng/ml) was associated with a greater increase in tADC from BL to TP1 (169.2±122.4×10-6 versus 22.9±75.5×10-6 mm2/s, p=0.03). This pilot study demonstrates the potential for early ADC metrics as a biomarker of response to nADT and EBRT in intermediate to high-risk PCA.

Cribiform and intraductal carcinoma in hereditary prostate cancer: clinical and pathological analysis of 20 cases.

Cribiform and intraductal carcinoma are patterns of aggressive prostate carcinoma. This study investigated the clinical and pathological features of hereditary prostate cancer. Twenty cases of hereditary prostate cancer from 11 family lines treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between 2016-2022 were included to summarize the clinical and pathological features by analyzing clinical information including follow up the survival of the patients and pathological features. Of the 20 hereditary prostate cancer cases, 19 were radical prostate specimens and 1 was a biopsy specimen. The mean age at diagnosis of the patients was 67.55 years and the mean PSA was 15.44 ng/ml, of which 10 cases had PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml and 5 cases had PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml. Of the 19 radical prostate specimens, Gleason cribriform pattern (Gleason grade 4) of PCa is observed in 15 cases (78.95%), and intraductal carcinoma, usually a rare form, is seen in 9 cases (47.3%). Two cases demonstrated pelvic lymph node metastasis, and 7 cases (35%) belonged to high-risk or very high-risk PCa. One case (5.26%) showed partial deletion of expression of RB1, and 13 cases (68.42%) showed deletion of expression of PTEN. Follow-up was 4-90 months, 2 cases had biochemical recurrence and 1 case died from prostate cancer. The mean age at diagnosis of this group of patients with hereditary prostate cancer was 67.55 years, the mean preoperative PSA was 15.44 ng/ml, and their histomorphology was characterized by a high percentage of intraductal carcinoma and cribriform pattern of the prostate.

Immunohistochemistry analysis of PSMA expression at prostatic biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer: potential implications for PSMA-PET patient selection.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein expressed by normal prostatic tissue. Therefore, molecular imaging targeting PSMA (PSMA-PET) has gained particular interest and diffusion for PCa staging and restaging. Several factors may affect PSMA-PET results, and many tools have been proposed to improve patient selection. Furthermore, PSMA expression is not homogeneous among different tissues and within the prostate itself. The aims of this study were to evaluate immunohistochemistry (IHC) features of prostate biopsy samples and to assess their correlation with whole-mount specimens and PSMA-PET parameters. We included consecutive high-risk PCa patients who underwent PSMA-PET for staging proposal at our institution from January 2022 to December 2022. The PET parameters selected were SUVmax, total volume (TV), and total lesion activity (TL). Each patient underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and fusion-targeted prostate biopsy prior to surgery. IHC analyses were performed on the index lesion cores. IHC visual score (VS) (1, 2, 3) and visual pattern (VP) (membranous, cytoplasmic, and combined) and the percentage of PSMA-negative tumor areas (PSMA%neg) within biopsy cores were evaluated. Forty-three patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy after PSMA-PET were available for analyses. Concordance between VS and VP at biopsy and final pathology showed a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.39 and 0.38, respectively. Patients with PSMA%neg <20% had a higher concordance in VS and VP (Cohen's kappa 0.49 and 0.4, respectively). No difference emerged in terms of median PSMA-TV (p = 0.3) and PSMA-TL (p = 0.9) according to VS at biopsy, while median SUVmax was higher in patients with VS 3 (p = 0.04). Higher SUVmax was associated with membranous and combined VP expression (p = 0.008). No difference emerged between patients with PSMA%neg <20% or PSMA%neg >20% on biopsy cores in terms of SUVmax, PSMA-TL, and PSMA-TV (p = 0.5, p = 0.5, and p = 0.9 respectively). We found a correlation between IHC VS and VP on targeted biopsy cores and SUVmax at PSMA-PET. However, the correlation between the IHC parameters of biopsy cores and final pathology was not as high as expected. Nevertheless, the presence of PSMA%neg <20% seems to have a better concordance in terms of visual score.

Risk of prostate cancer death after radical radiotherapy with neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy with bicalutamide or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

Background Oncological outcome after radical radiotherapy (RRT) combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen suppression therapy (AST) may differ according to type of AST. The aim of this nationwide register-based study was to investigate risk of prostate cancer (Pca) death after different neoadjuvant and adjuvant ASTs; (i) bicalutamide, (ii) gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH) or (iii) combined bicalutamide and GnRH (CAB), together with RRT. Materials and Methods Data for 6882 men diagnosed with high-risk Pca between 2007 and 2020 and treated with primary RRT was retrieved from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 5.0. Time to Pca death according to type of neoadjuvant and adjuvant AST was assessed by use of Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for putative confounders. Results Data were stratified by RRT type since the effect of AST in risk of Pca death differed according to type of RRT. Compared with the reference RRT combined with neoadjuvant CAB/adjuvant GnRH, risk of Pca death for men treated with CAB/bicalutamide and conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (CF-EBRT) was hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50–1.04), hypofractionated EBRT (HF-EBRT), HR 1.35 (95% CI: 0.65–2.81) and EBRT with high dose rate brachytherapy (EBRT-HDRBT), HR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.37–1.95). Risk of Pca death for men treated with bicalutamide/bicalutamide and: (i) CF-EBRT was HR 2.35 (95% CI: 1.42–3.90), (ii) HF-EBRT, HR 0.70 (95% CI: 0.26–1.85), (iii) HF-EBRT, HR 4.07 (95% CI: 1.88–8.77) vs the reference. Conclusion In this observational study, risk of Pca death between men receiving different combinations of AST varied according to RRT type. No difference was found in risk of Pca death for men treated with bicalutamide or GnRH as adjuvant therapy to RRT following neoadjuvant CAB. Risk of Pca death was increased for men with monotherapy neo-/adjuvant bicalutamide in combination with CF-EBRT or EBRT-HDRBT.

F18-DCFPyL PSMA-PET/CT vs. mpMRI for Localizing the Gross Target Volume for Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer

Local recurrences in prostate cancer (Pca) after radiotherapy generally occur in the site of dominant tumor burden, and recent evidence based on multi parametric (mpMRI) supports tumor-targeted escalation of dose to improve biochemical disease-free survival outcomes. With the recent emergence of prostate cancer targeted radiotracers, we hypothesize that PSMA-PET and mpMRI may not equally depict the pathological gross target volume (pGTV) at risk of recurrence after radiotherapy. Subjects who underwent both mpMRI and 18F DCFPyl PSMA-PET/CT prior to radiotherapy were identified from a prospective REB-approved registry. Patients who were naive to radiotherapy and patients with local recurrences were evaluated. Each patient underwent standard of care systematic biopsies prior to imaging and treatment. Sextants from prostate biopsy were analyzed on an independent basis. Per previous published work, pGTV at risk of recurrence was defined as the pathological dominant lesions with peak PCL (percentage core length) involvement and any sextants with ≽ 40% PCL involvement. Each imaging method was analyzed independently to determine spatial correspondence of the visible tumor to pGTV at risk of recurrence. Lesions scored 4-5 (PIRADSv2.1) were identified on mpMRI. For PSMA-PET, regions with uptake higher than the adjacent background with scaling SUVmin-max 0-10 were identified. Forty-seven patients with histopathological proven intermediate to high-risk Pca represented the study cohort. Of the 320 sextants, 135 were involved with PCa. Thirty-six percent (17∕47) of patients had a history of prior radiotherapy. PSMA-PET identified the pGTV in 89% (42∕47) of patients, while mpMRI yielded a higher detection rate at 98% (46∕47) (89% vs 98% p = 0.038). The only pGTV not detected on mpMRI was also missed by PSMA-PET, and had received EBRT in 2011. Of the four other pGTVs at risk of recurrence missed by PSMA-PET, three had no history of prior radiotherapy and one was treated with brachytherapy in 2005. Overall, we found no differences in imaging detection rates between previously treated and untreated patients. More detailed volumetric analyses are ongoing and will be presented. mpMRI may provide superior detection of the pGTV at risk of recurrence in comparison to PSMA-PET. Until further research is completed, clinicians should exercise caution in omitting mpMRI and utilizing PSMA-PET as the sole imaging method for GTV targeting.

Targeted Biopsy in Men High Risk for Prostate Cancer: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus mpMRI

Introduction/BackgroundTo evaluate the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus mpMRI targeted biopsy (TPBx) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men high risk for PCa. Materials and MethodsFrom January 2021 to March 2023, 125 men with clinical parameters high risk for PCa were evaluated by mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT; median PSA was 32.5 ng/mL (range: 12-160 ng/mL) and 60/125 (48%) had abnormal digital rectal examination. The mpMRI lesions with PI-RADS scores ≥ 3 and/or 68Ga-PSMA areas characterized by a standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values ≥ 8 were submitted to TPBx (4 cores); in addition, all the patients underwent systematic transperineal prostate biopsy (18 cores) under sedation and antibiotic prophylaxis. ResultsIn 80 of 125 men (64%) a csPCa was found: 10 (12.5%) had a ISUP Grade Group 3 (GG), 45 (56.2%) a ISUP GG4 and 25 (31.2%) ISUP GG5. The median intraprostatic 68Ga-PSMA SUVmax was 42.3 (range:10.5-164) and 72 of 80 (90%) had a PI-RADS score ≥ 3. 68GaPSMA PET/CT showed the presence of metastases in 20 of 80 (25%) men: the median SUVmax in bone (15 cases) and nodes (40 cases) metastases was 55 and 47, respectively. Accuracy of 68Ga PSMA PET/CT (SUVmax cut-off ≥ 8) versus mpMRI PI-RADS score ≥ 3 in the diagnosis of csPCa was 92 versus 86.2%. Conclusion68GaPSMA PET/CT demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy as a single procedure for the diagnosis and staging of high-risk PCa.

PSMA PET findings in an “EMBARK-like” cohort of patients with high-risk non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A single center post-hoc retrospective analysis.

5091 Background: The EMBARK trial is a phase 3, randomized, study evaluating use of enzalutamide with or without concomitant leuprolide in non-metastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer patients. Eligibility status for the trial relied upon conventional imaging which under detects metastatic disease in comparison to PSMA-PET imaging. The aim of this post-hoc retrospective analysis was to describe the PSMA-PET findings in a patient population representative of the EMBARK trial. Methods: This was a post-hoc, retrospective analysis of 5 prospective studies of PSMA PET conducted at UCLA from 2016 to 2021 that included patients with recurrent PCa following RP, RT or SRT. Patients were included if they met eligibility for enrollment in the EMBARK trial at the time of their PSMA scan defined as the following: Rising PSA at a level above 1.0ng/mL (post RP and SRT) or 2.0ng/mL &gt; nadir (post-RT), PSA doubling time ≤ 9 months, Serum testosterone ≥ 150 ng/dL. Exclusion criteria constituted: distant metastatic disease as assessed by radiographic imaging, prior hormonal therapy or systemic therapy for prostate cancer. PSMA PET findings (PROMISE miTNM stage, number of lesions) were collected from the clinical imaging reports. Descriptive statistics were used (median, range). Results: From 2002 patients screened, 146 patients were included in the analysis. Median time from primary therapy to PSMA PET was 39 (2.1-261) months. Median pre-scan PSA levels and PSA doubling time in patients who underwent RP (n=85), dRT (n=22), post-RP SRT (n=39) and overall (n=146) were 2.4 ng/mL (1-72.1), 8.3 ng/mL (2.37-202), 2.58 ng/ml (1.1-32.3), 2.7 ng/mL (1-202), and 3.5 months (1-9), 3.3 months (1-9), 4.4 months (1-9), 3.7 (1-9) months, respectively. PSMA-PET was positive in 80%, 41%, 85%, 83% of the RP, dRT, RP + SRT and overall populations, respectively. Poly-metastatic disease (≥5 lesions) was found in 19%, 32%, 21% and 21% of cases, respectively. PSMA-PET detected disease only localized to the prostate fossa (miT+N0M0) in 7%, 32%, 0% and 9% respectively. PSMA-PET detected pelvic nodal disease (miTxN1M0) in 40% 18% 28% and 34% respectively. PSMA PET detected any distant metastatic disease (miTxNxM1) in 33%, 41% 56% and 40% respectively. PSMA-PET detected metastatic nodal only disease (N1 and/or M1a) in 58% 32% 74% and 39% and osseous disease (M1b) in 19% 23% 31% and 23% cases respectively. Conclusions: In this “EMBARK-like” cohort of patients with high-risk nmCS PCa and PSA DT &lt; 9 months, PSMA PET was positive in 83% of patients, detected M1 disease in 40% of patients and over one-fifth of cases presented with 5 or more lesions. PSMA-PET provides novel additional risk stratification for patients with high-risk nmCS PCa without distant metastasis based on conventional imaging. Further studies are needed to assess its independent prognostic value and use for treatment guidance. Clinical trial information: NCT03582774 .

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonist and Tegafur-Uracil Chemohormonal Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

This retrospective single-center cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combination of neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonist and tegafur-uracil (UFT) therapy (NCHT) and investigated the medical records of patients with high-risk PCa who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The therapy was followed by RARP for high-risk PCa. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups: low-intermediate-risk PCa patients who underwent RARP without neoadjuvant therapy (non-high-risk) and those who underwent NCHT followed by RARP (high-risk group). This study enrolled 227 patients (126: non-high-risk and 101: high-risk group). Patients in the high-risk-group had high-grade cancer compared to those in the non-high-risk-group. At the median follow-up period of 12.0 months, there were no PCa deaths; two patients (0.9%) died of other causes. Twenty patients developed biochemical recurrence (BCR); the median time until BCR was 9.9 months after surgery. The 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 94.2% and 91.1% in the non-high-risk and high-risk-group, respectively (p = 0.465). Grade ≥3 NCHT-related adverse events developed in nine patients (8.9%). This study indicates that combining neoadjuvant LHRH antagonists and UFT followed by RARP may improve oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk PCa.

MP59-18 THE INCIDENCE OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER HoLEP

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP59-18 THE INCIDENCE OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER HoLEP Ali S Antar, Tudor Borza, Ethan Richmond, Glenn O Allen, Jordan R Krieger, Margaret A Knoedler, Christopher M Manakas, Wei Huang, Dan R Gralnek, and Matthew D Grimes Ali S AntarAli S Antar More articles by this author , Tudor BorzaTudor Borza More articles by this author , Ethan RichmondEthan Richmond More articles by this author , Glenn O AllenGlenn O Allen More articles by this author , Jordan R KriegerJordan R Krieger More articles by this author , Margaret A KnoedlerMargaret A Knoedler More articles by this author , Christopher M ManakasChristopher M Manakas More articles by this author , Wei HuangWei Huang More articles by this author , Dan R GralnekDan R Gralnek More articles by this author , and Matthew D GrimesMatthew D Grimes More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003312.18AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Rates of incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) are higher than in other bladder outlet surgeries. Management presents a challenge considering the effects of HoLEP on anatomy and other causes of mortality in the older population. We examined cancer characteristics and initial management of patients with iPCa after HoLEP to understand the significance of these incidentally discovered cancers. METHODS: Patients with iPCa were identified over a 4 year period from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Clinical data collected included preoperative PSA levels, cancer stage, grade, initial management, post operative PSA, staging imaging or biopsy. We defined clinically significant cancers as those where treatment other than watchful waiting was recommended by NCCN guidelines based on predicted life expectancy, which was estimated using the Social Security Life Expectancy Calculator. RESULTS: 183/913 (20%) patients were diagnosed iPCa after HoLEP. 133 patients (73%) had clinically significant and 50 patients (27%) had clinically insignificant iPCa. Of clinically significant cancers, 7 patients with high risk PCa were managed with upfront local treatment and the rest underwent PSA surveillance (Figure 1). 11 experienced a PSA increase and underwent local treatment after confirmatory biopsy: 3 underwent RALP, 7 underwent XRT and one underwent ADT, all with appropriate PSA response to treatment. The clinically insignificant population underwent PSA observation. 9 were lost to follow up and 5 experienced a PSA increase triggering intervention: 4 underwent XRT and 1 underwent ADT with appropriate PSA response. At a mean follow-up of 16.3 months (IQR 7.9–13.4 months), there were 6 deaths, all from non-cancer related causes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low risk nature of many post-HoLEP iPCA, the majority were classified as clinically significant cancers based on NCCN guidelines. Data driven guidelines for pre-operative screening evaluation and post-operative management of iPCa after HoLEP are critical given the frequency and clinical implications these cancer diagnoses. Source of Funding: None © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e815 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ali S Antar More articles by this author Tudor Borza More articles by this author Ethan Richmond More articles by this author Glenn O Allen More articles by this author Jordan R Krieger More articles by this author Margaret A Knoedler More articles by this author Christopher M Manakas More articles by this author Wei Huang More articles by this author Dan R Gralnek More articles by this author Matthew D Grimes More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Histology and PSMA Expression on Immunohistochemistry in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Features in Primary Staging.

PSMA-PET/CT is a suitable replacement for conventional imaging in the primary staging of PCa. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the correlation between parameters discovered by PSMA PET/CT in primary staging and either prostate histopathology (pT) findings or PSMA-IHC expression in a cohort of biopsy-proven high-risk PCa candidates for surgery. Clinical information (age, iPSA-value, and grading group) and PSMA-PET/CT parameters (SUVmax, PSMA tumor volume [PSMA-TV], and total lesion [PSMA-TL]) were compared with pT (including histologic pattern, Gleason grade, and lymphovascular invasion [LVI]) and PSMA-IHC features, including visual quantification (VS) with a four-tiered score (0 = negative, 1+ = weak, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = strong), growth pattern (infiltrative vs expansive), and visual pattern (cytoplasmic vs membranous). In total, 44 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 67 (IQR 57-77); the median iPSA was 9.4 ng/dL (IQR 12.5-6.0). One patient (3%) was grading group (GG) 3, 27/44 (61%) were GG4, and 16/44 (36%) were GG5. PSMA-PET/CT detection rate for the presence of primary prostate cancer was 100%. Fused/poorly formed Gleason grade 4 features were predominant (22/44-50%); a cribriform pattern was present in 18/44 (41%) and acinar in 4/44 (9%). We found that lower PSMA-TVs were mostly related to acinar, while higher PSMA-TVs correlated with a higher probability to have a cribriform pattern (p-value 0.04). LVI was present in 21/44(48%) patients. We found that higher PSMA-TV and PSMA-TL are predictive of LVI p-value 0.002 and p-value 0.01, respectively. There was no correlation between PET-parameters and perineural invasion (PNI), probably because this was present in almost all the patients. Moreover, patients with high PSMA-TL values displayed the highest PSMA-IHC expression (VS3+) with a membranous pattern. In conclusion, PSMA-TV and PSMA-TL are predictors of a cribriform pattern and LVI. These conditions are mostly related to higher aggressiveness and worse outcomes.

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features for recurrent prostate cancer following proton radiation therapy-A pilot study.

The role of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) for postproton radiation evaluation is unclear. In this pilot study, we characterize the mp-MRI features using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) following proton radiation therapy. After obtaining IRB approval, we identified 163 consecutive cases who underwent MRI-fusion prostate biopsy at our institution from November 2017 to May 2020. This study evaluated patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with biochemical recurrence following proton radiation. Patients were excluded if they had grossly metastatic disease, metal fragments, implanted devices, or with surgically removed prostates. The mpMRI studies were reviewed in depth and scored by 2 fellowship-trained radiologists. Following MRI-fusion biopsy of lesions of interest (LOI), slides were read by fellowship-trained pathologists. We found 14 patients with 16 lesions who met the study inclusion criteria. The median age was 69 years (range 57-79) and median time to biochemical recurrence was 7.3 years (range 3-13). On post-treatment imaging, decreases in prostate size and diffusely decreased T2 signal intensity were observed, making the use of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and early enhancement at dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging often necessary for diagnosis of disease recurrence. We identified a total of 16 lesions with PIRADS scores of 3 or higher. Of these lesions, there were 5 PIRADS 3 lesions (4/5 (80%) without prostate cancer), 7 PIRADS 4-5 lesions (6 (86%) had high risk Pca), and 4 lesions with unassigned PIRADS scores (100% had high risk cancers). Among the MRI variables, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) heterogeneity had the strongest association with recurrence of PCa (P < 0.001). Results of our pilot study showed that the PIRADS scoring system in the postproton radiation therapy setting has some correlations with prostate cancer recurrence; However, the clinical value of these findings are unclear. While definitive PIRADS categorization of lesions demonstrated expected frequency of cancer consistent with the scoring system, all unassigned lesions also harbored malignancy suggesting a cautious approach to PIRADS scoring system in postproton radiation setting. The findings from this study may be validated using a larger cohort.

Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) in the management of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

161 Background: Although still discussed controversially, cRP represents a therapeutic option for mHSPC patients in the context of a multimodality approach. It was the purpose of our study to retrospectively review the oncological and functional outcome of a single-center cohort of cRP patients. Methods: A total of 134 mHSPC patients underwent cRP with pelvic lymphadenectomy. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT, n = 34), ADT + docetaxel (n=15), or ADT plus ABI/ENZA/APA (n=85) for 6 months which was continued postop. Follow-up studies were performed at 3-month intervals, new imaging studies with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was done at PSA-levels &gt; 1.0 ng/ml. Perioperative complications were evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. Clinical progression free survival (cPFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were calculated via Kaplan-Maier analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the impact of biopsy ISUP grade, PSA at diagnosis and preop., PSA decrease, T stage, and metastatic burden on PFS and CSS. Results: 115 and 19 had low and high volume mHSPC, resp. Mean age was 64.2 (42-88) years, mean preop. PSA was 3.2 (0.1-21.6) ng/ml. The median Follow-up ist 53.7 (4 – 168) months. M1a, M1b and M1c were present in 28 (20.9%), 98 (73.1%) and 8 (6.0%) men. Pathohistology demonstrated pT0 in 3 (2.2%), pT2a-c in 21 (15.7%), pT3 and pT4 in 105 (78.3%) and 5 (3.7%). pN0 and pN+ was diagnosed in 38 (28.3%) and 96 (71.7%) pts. There was no significant difference between type of ADT and final pathohistology. Clavien-Dindo Grad 3a-b and 4 complications were observed in 13 (9.7%) and 2 (1.5%) pts. CSS was 88.1% and cPFS was 53%. None of the pts developed locally recurrent disease. Overall survival was reduced in M1 high volume (61.9% vs 92.8%, p=0.002) and pN+ (85.7% vs 96.7%, p=0.001). cT≥3b (HR=2.24, p=0.02) and M1 high volume (HR=2.35, p=0.01) were associated with reduced cPFS; M1 high volume (HR=1.49, p=0.03) and relative PSA decrease £60% (HR=1.37, p=0.03) were associated with reduced CSS. Conclusions: cRP can be performed with minimal morbidity. mHSPC patients with clinically localized high risk PCA, low metastatic burden and good response to nADT benefit most from this approach. The risk for symptomatic local relapse is low. Limitation of the study is its retrospective design.

Clinical Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes on Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy before Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Surgery for Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer in a Chinese Cohort.

To analyze the perioperative outcomes of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) before laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery for localized high-risk prostate cancer in a Chinese cohort. The clinical data of 385 patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in our hospital from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, including 168 patients with preoperative NHT and 217 patients with simple surgery. Clinical characteristics were compared in the above two groups, the laparoscopic RP (LRP) cohort (n = 234) and the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) cohort (n = 151), respectively. In the overall cohort, compared with the control group, the NHT group had a shorter operative time, less blood loss, a lower positive surgical margin rate, and a higher proportion of Gleason score (GS) downgrading after the operation (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in hospitalization time, biochemical recurrence, urine leakage, urinary continence, or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (p > 0.05). In the LRP cohort, it was found that the NHT group also had shorter operative time, less blood loss, lower positive surgical margin rate, a higher proportion of GS downgrading after the operation, and faster recovery of urinary control than the control group (p < 0.05). There was no marked difference in hospitalization time, biochemical recurrence, urinary leakage, or PSA progression-free survival. However, in the RALP cohort, the NHT group had a significant difference in the GS downgrading after the operation compared with the control group (p < 0.05). In the overall cohort, multiple analyses showed that initial PSA level, GS at biopsy, clinical T stage, lymph node invasion, use of NHT, and surgical methods were significantly associated with positive surgical margin (p < 0.05) while NHT did not account for biochemical recurrence (p > 0.05). NHT can lower the difficulty of surgery, reduce positive surgical margin rate, and help recovery in short-term urinary control in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after LRP. However, we do not have evidence on the benefit of NHT in high-risk PCa patients treated with RALP. For these patients, surgery can be performed as early as possible.

Optical genome mapping identifies clinically relevant genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer biopsy sample

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is characterized by complex genomic rearrangements such as the ETS oncogene family fusions, yet the clinical relevance is not well established. While paneled genetic tests of DNA repair genes are recommended in advanced PCa, conventional genomic or cytogenetic tools are not ideal for genome-wide screening of structural variations (SVs) such as balanced translocation due to cost and/or resolution issues.MethodsIn this study, we tested the feasibility of whole-genome optical genomic mapping (OGM), a newly developed platform for genome-wide SV analysis to detect complex genomic rearrangements in consecutive unselected PCa samples from MRI/US-fusion targeted biopsy.ResultsWe tested ten samples, and nine (90%) passed quality check. Average mapping rate and coverage depth were 58.1 ± 23.7% and 157.3 ± 97.7×, respectively (mean ± SD). OGM detected copy number alterations such as chr6q13 loss and chr8q12-24 gain. Two adjacent tumor samples were distinguished by inter/intra-chromosomal translocations, revealing that they’re from the same ancestor. Furthermore, OGM detected large deletion of chr13q13.1 accompanied by inter-chromosomal translocation t(13;20)(q13.1;p13) occurring within BRCA2 gene, suggesting complete loss of function.ConclusionIn conclusion, clinically relevant genomic SVs were successfully detected in PCa samples by OGM. We suggest that OGM can complement panel sequencing of DNA repair genes BRCA1/2 or ATM in high-risk PCa.

Piflufolastat F 18-PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: An analysis of OSPREY (cohorts A and B) standardized uptake value (SUV) results stratified by PSA and Gleason score.

5024 Background: The OSPREY clinical trial was a phase 2/3 prospective study of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT using piflufolastat F 18. Piflufolastat F 18 (aka 18F-DCFPyL or PyL) is a novel PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceutical approved for imaging of PCa pts both at initial staging and for disease recurrence. Here we describe SUV results by biopsy status, baseline PSA levels, and Gleason score (GS). Methods: Piflufolastat F 18-PET/CT was evaluated in men with NCCN high-risk PCa scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RP-PLND) (Cohort A) and men with radiologically suspected recurrent/metastatic PCa (Cohort B). A single IV dose of 9 mCi (333 MBq) of piflufolastat F 18 was administered followed by PET/CT acquisition 1-2 hours later. Piflufolastat F 18 uptake in various lesion locations as defined by maximum and peak SUV (SUVmax, SUVpeak) were determined by three blinded, independent central readers for each tissue (e.g., bone, lymph nodes (LN), soft tissue). To measure SUVs, the reader placed a volume of interest (VOI) on each identified lesion. SUVmax was defined as the maximum single-voxel SUV within the VOI. SUVpeak within the VOI was defined as the average SUV within a fixed-sized VOI (1 cm diameter sphere), representing the cluster with the highest average SUV. Results: 345 men underwent piflufolastat F 18-PET/CT. Cohort B (n = 93evaluable) SUVmax and SUVpeak were significantly higher for biopsy positive (+)(one biopsy lesion/pt) when compared to biopsy negative (-) lesions from bone and LN. SUVpeak for biopsied bone and LN (Cohort B) appeared to increase with rising baseline PSA. In high-risk PCa pts, SUVpeak for prostate (Cohort A; n = 252 evaluable) increased with baseline PSA and were highest for GS 9-10 (Table). Conclusions: Piflufolastat F 18-PET/CT uptake was significantly higher in biopsy + lesions and increased with baseline PSA. Prostate SUVpeak was highest for GS 9-10. Clinical trial information: NCT02981368. [Table: see text]