High-risk Multiple Myeloma Research Articles

Lymphopenia Predicts Poor Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Bone marrow microenvironment plays an important role in promoting growth and survival of multiple myeloma (MM) cells. The tumor-promoting immune microenvironment is augmented while anti-tumor immune responses are inhibited. Although clinical and genomic markers of high-risk MM have been described, the immune status is just being recognized as a potential mediator of disease behavior. This is even more important with the development of a number of immune-based therapies. Based on these considerations, we evaluated peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as an easily accessible marker representing immune microenvironment at diagnosis and following treatment of MM. We retrospectively evaluated 11,427 patients diagnosed with MM between 2000 and 2019 at Veteran’s Administration hospitals using ALC obtained closest to diagnosis and up to 2.5 years thereafter. Patients were stratified into 3 ALC categories: severely low, low, and normal (<1, 1-1.5, and >1.5 x 103/mm3, respectively). Lymphopenia (including severely low and low ALC) was present in 53% of patients at MM diagnosis and was associated with inferior overall survival (OS). Median OS of patients with severely low, low, and normal ALC at diagnosis was 2.7, 3.3, and 4.2 years (P < .001), respectively. Moreover, persistent or new development of lymphopenia during treatment and follow-up was also associated with inferior OS. Our findings support the use of ALC as a biomarker for risk stratification in MM.

MM-517 Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Experience

MM-517 Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Experience

Poor outcome despite modern treatments: A retrospective study of 99 patients with primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia.

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare monoclonal gammopathy, associated with short survival. Because of its very low incidence, only a few cohorts have been reported and thus, information on this disease is scarce. The goal of this study was to better understand the clinical features, prognostic factors, and efficacy of modern treatments in both primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL). We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients diagnosed with PCL, defined as circulating plasma cells ≥20% of total leukocytes and/or ≥2 × 109/L. We identified 99 eligible PCL patients, of whom 33 were pPCL and 66 were sPCL. The median progression-free survival (PFS) to frontline treatment and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 4.8 (95% CI, 0.4-9.2) and 18.3 months (95% CI, 0.0-39.0) for pPCL and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1) and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.9-1.5) for sPCL (both p < 0.001). We observed no improvement in OS over time (2005-2012 vs. 2013-2020, p = 0.629 for pPCL and p = 0.329 for sPCL). Finally, our data suggested that sPCL originates from a high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) population with a short OS (median 30.2 months), early relapse after stem cell transplant (median 11.9 months) and a high proportion of patients with multiple cytogenetic abnormalities (36% with ≥2 abnormalities). This study is one of the largest PCL cohorts reported. We are also the first to investigate characteristics of MM before its transformation into sPCL and demonstrate that high-risk biologic features already present at the time of MM diagnosis. Moreover, our data highlights the lack of improvement in PCL survival in recent years and the urgent need for better treatment options.

Real World Outcome of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: An Indian Tertiary Care Centre Experience

High risk myeloma is a heterogeneous disease cohort with significant variation in risk stratification across literatures. Real world outcomes differ from controlled clinical trials and affected by socioeconomical determinants of health. This study from an Indian tertiary care set up highlights’ treatment patterns and outcome of real-world high risk myeloma patients. Out of 384,76(19.7%) high risk myeloma patients were analyzed (median age 58 years). Most common HRCA was 1 q gain 36(47.4%) followed by del17p 32(42.1%). 61/76(80.2%) received Bortezomib based triplets and 15(19.74%) daratumumab based quadruplets induction, 31(40.79%) received ASCT. Median duration of follow up was 19.5 months. The 2 year OS and PFS was 73.8%, 52.6% respectively. Estimated 3 year OS was 74.7% in ASCT cohort versus 52.9% (P = .0067) without. Estimated 3-year PFS in the ASCT cohort was 72.1% versus 30.3% (P = .0026) without. Estimated 3-year OS for single hit and multi hit ultra HRMM was 67.7% and 61.9% (P = .642) whereas PFS was 58.2% and 35.2% (P = .486) respectively. In multivariate analysis ASCT correlated with better OS (HR 0.3, P = .041) and PFS (HR 0.35,P = .012). Absence of baseline renal impairment correlated with better OS (HR 4.12, P = .004) only. Early aggressive therapy with prompt ASCT translates to a better survival in high risk myeloma. Emphasis on real world clinical outcome is the need of the hour for addressing practical issues and improving global myeloma outcome.

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Experience

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Experience

Maintenance therapy for cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma: landscape in the era of novel drugs

Although the significant strides in novel therapeutic approaches have prolonged the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the unfavorable prognosis of cytogenetically high-risk newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) remains intractable with the lack of consensus regarding the choice of maintenance regimens. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of examining the effectiveness of various maintenance treatments for this group of patients in jeopardy. Overall, 17 studies with 1937 high-risk NDMM patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Combination therapies involving novel drugs presented encouraging prospects in the maintenance phase, while the patients and circumstances for the application of different regimens still needed to be further distinguished and clarified. To investigate the current status of maintenance therapy of high-risk NDMM patients in clinical practice, a real-world cohort of high-risk NDMM was retrospectively incorporated 80 patients with lenalidomide maintenance and 53 patients with bortezomib maintenance, presenting the median PFS of 31.7 months and 30.4 months, respectively (p = 0.874, HR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.628–1.486). Collectively, this study illuminated the present constraints of conventional approaches during the maintenance phase for high-risk NDMM patients while highlighting the future potential associated with enhanced regimens integrating novel medications.

Post-ASCT consolidation with elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in high-risk and ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma: a retrospective single-center study

Patients with high-risk multiple-myeloma (HRMM) and ultra-high-risk multiple-myeloma (UHRMM) show rapid disease progression and shorter survival compared to those with standard-risk multiple-myeloma (SRMM). Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has shown inferior outcomes in this subgroup compared to SRMM, and there is an unmet need for improved post-ASCT therapy. This retrospective study, from September 2016 to March 2023, assesses elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (ERd or EPd) as consolidation therapy post-ASCT for HRMM and UHRMM patients. HRMM (1 cytogenetic abnormality) and UHRMM (≥2 cytogenetic abnormalities) were defined using IMWG and mSMART criteria. Among 75 patients (median age: 64 years), 59 received ERd and 16 EPd. Median progression-free survival was 29.3 months for all patients, 32.7 months for HRMM, and 21.9 months for UHRMM. Elotuzumab plus an IMiD consolidation therapy post-ASCT demonstrated promising efficacy compared to other studies, with a fixed duration and reduced lenalidomide-related toxicity.

Risk-adapted treatment in multiple myeloma: Does more make it merrier?

Kaiser etal. offer management recommendations for transplant-eligible, high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM), derived from recent trials exploring treatment intensification in the various phases of front-line therapy. The definition of HRMM continues to evolve with emergence of novel genomic insights and impact of modern therapies, underscoring the need to expand beyond traditional interphase fluorescence insitu hybridization cytogenetics and International Staging System staging for a precise risk assessment. Despite progress, ongoing challenges in treatment delivery and tolerability underscore the urgency for exploring novel approaches like T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell to enhance outcomes in this complex patient population. Commentary on: Kaiser etal. Diagnosis and initial treatment of transplant-eligible high-risk myeloma patients: A British Society for Haematology/UK Myeloma Society Good Practice Paper. Br J Haematol 2024 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.19623.

Recent Advances in The Definition of the Molecular Alterations Occurring in Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disorder of the monoclonal plasma cells and is the second most common hematologic malignancy. MM initiation and progression are dependent upon complex genomic abnormalities. The current pathogenic model of MM includes two types of primary events, represented by chromosome translocations or chromosome number alterations resulting in hyperdiploidy. These primary molecular events are observed both in MM and in monoclonal gammopathy, its premalignant precursor. Subsequent genetic events allow the progression of monoclonal gammopathy to MM and, together with primary events, contribute to the genetic complexity and heterogeneity of MM. Newer therapies have considerably improved patient outcomes; however, MM remains an incurable disease and most patients experience multiple relapses. The dramatic progresses achieved in the analysis of the heterogeneous molecular features of different MM patients allowed a comprehensive molecular classification of MM and the definition of an individualized prognostic model to predict an individual MM patient's response to different therapeutic options. Despite these progresses, prognostic models fail to identify a significant proportion of patients destined to early relapse. Treatment strategies are increasingly. Based on disease biology, trials are enriched for high-risk MMs, whose careful definition and categorization requires DNA sequencing studies.

Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L and urine monoclonal protein is ≥200 mg/24 h), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, del 1p, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. Presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma; three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma. In patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation, induction therapy consists of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Selected standard risk patients can delay transplant until first relapse. Frail patients who not candidates for transplant are treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by maintenance or alternatively with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd) until progression. Standard risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance is needed for high-risk myeloma. A triplet regimen is usually needed at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy and bispecific antibodies are additional options.

Impaired acute-phase humoral immunity is the major factor predicting unfavorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants outbreak infection.

At the end of 2022, a huge tide of SARS-CoV-2 infection mainly Omicron BA.4/5 developed in China. Multiple myeloma (MM) patients suffered cancer deterioration and mortality from COVID-19, yet profound analyses of Omicron variants-induced immunity function are scarce. We presented a longitudinal study in 218 MM patients and 73 healthy controls (HCs), reporting the prognostic factors and dynamic humoral and cellular immune responses. Neutralizing antibody and interferon γ ELISpot assay of SARS-CoV-2 was tested at three time points: 2-4, 8-10, and 14-16 weeks after infections. Our data showed older age, active MM, relapsed/refractory MM (R/RMM), immunotherapy, comorbidity, and non-vaccination were risk factors associated with hospitalization. Severe humoral immunity impairment within 2-4 weeks was especially seen in patients with unvaccinated, older age, immunotherapy, R/RMM and comorbidities, while T-cell response was relatively intact. Although antibodies of Omicron variants reached positive levels in MM patients at 8-10 weeks, half lost effective antibody protection at 14-16 weeks. However, most seronegative patients (76.2% at 2-4 weeks, 83.3% at 8-10 weeks) could develop effective T-cell response. Notably, the inactivated wild-type vaccinated patients exhibited weaker humoral and cellular immunity only at 2-4 weeks, escalating to similar levels as those in HCs later. Our findings indicate impairment of humoral immunity at acute-phase after infection is the major factor correlated with hospitalization. One-month suspension of immune therapy is suggested to prevent serious infection. These results confirm the value of inactivated vaccine, but indicate the need for additional booster at 14-16 weeks after infection for high-risk MM population.

Identification of a novel monocyte/macrophage-related gene signature for predicting survival and immune response in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological tumor with poor immunotherapy effect. This study was to develop a monocyte/macrophage-related prognostic risk score (MMrisk) and identify new therapeutic biomarkers for AML. We utilized differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in combination with single-cell RNA sequencing to identify monocyte/macrophage-related genes (MMGs). Eight genes were selected for the construction of a MMrisk model using univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis. We then validated the MMrisk on two GEO datasets. Lastly, we investigated the immunologic characteristics and advantages of immunotherapy and potential targeted drugs for MMrisk groups. Our study identified that the MMrisk is composed of eight MMGs, including HOPX, CSTB, MAP3K1, LGALS1, CFD, MXD1, CASP1 and BCL2A1. The low MMrisk group survived longer than high MMrisk group (P < 0.001). The high MMrisk group was positively correlated with B cells, plasma cells, CD4 memory cells, Mast cells, CAFs, monocytes, M2 macrophages, Endothelial, tumor mutation, and most immune checkpoints (PD1, Tim-3, CTLA4, LAG3). Furthermore, drug sensitivity analysis showed that AZD.2281, Axitinib, AUY922, ABT.888, and ATRA were effective in high-risk MM patients. Our research shows that MMrisk is a potential biomarker which is helpful to identify the molecular characteristics of AML immunology.

Identifying high-risk multiple myeloma patients: A novel approach using a clonal gene signature.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with a small subset of high-risk patients having poor prognoses. Identifying these patients is crucial for treatment management and strategic decisions. In this study, we developed a novel computational framework to define prognostic gene signatures by selecting genes with expression driven by clonal copy number alterations. We applied this framework to MM and developed a clonal gene signature (CGS) consisting of 22 genes and evaluated in five independent datasets. The CGS provided significant prognostic values after adjusting for well-established factors including cytogenetic abnormalities, International Staging System (ISS), and Revised ISS (R-ISS). Importantly, CGS demonstrated higher performance in identifying high-risk patients compared to the GEP70 and SKY92 signatures recommended for prognostic stratification of MM. CGS can further stratify patients into subgroups with significantly differential prognoses when applied to the high- and low-risk groups identified by GEP70 and SKY92. Additionally, CGS scores are significantly associated with patient response to dexamethasone, a commonly used treatment for MM. In summary, we proposed a computational framework that requires only gene expression data to identify CGSs for prognosis prediction. CGS provides a useful biomarker for improving prognostic stratification in MM, especially for identifying the highest-risk patients.

Post-ASCT consolidation with EPD or ERD in patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

7534 Background: Patients (pts) with high-risk (HR) Multiple Myeloma (MM), characterized by at least two cytogenetic abnormalities often experience rapid disease progression and early relapse post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) with median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 24 or 12 months with or without lenalidomide maintenance (Panopoulou et al, Blood 2023). This study assesses the efficacy and safety of EPD (Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) or ERD (Elotuzumab, lenalidomide , Dexamethasone) as consolidation therapy post-ASCT in HR MM pts. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed records of MM pts treated with consolidative ERD or EPD from September 2016 to March 2023. We collected baseline MM characteristics, treatment history, adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes. HR MM pts were defined by 2 or more cytogenetic abnormalities (del 17p, 1q21 gain or amplification, t(14;16), t(14;20), complex karyotype) and/or high-risk gene expression profiling scores (GEP, SKY92). All patients, aged ≥21, underwent ≥1 full cycle of EPD or ERD post-ASCT, administered for a total of four 28-day cycles, following the standard dosing regimen with a rapid dexamethasone taper over the last two cycles. Results: A total of 78 HR MM pts, median age 64 years with 51.2% males and 71.7% caucasians were included. Of them, 62 pts received ERD and 16 received EPD. FISH revealed 62.7% of pts had 2 or more high risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Other pts expressed a combination of cytogenetic abnormalities and/or high-risk GEP or SKY92 scores. The table shows improvement in MRD negativity rates from 21.7% to 26.9% pre and post consolidation, and in VGPR or better from 78.2% to 85.8%. Median PFS for all pts, defined from the time of ASCT to disease progression, was 26.9 months. Most common adverse effects were anemia (71.7%), fatigue (55.1%) and thrombocytopenia (51.2%). Five patients experienced grade 3 adverse events, including 3 with infectious etiology (3.8%) and 2 with immune-mediated toxicity (2.5%). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Four cycles of EPD or ERD consolidation therapy post-ASCT, demonstrated promising efficacy in HR MM pts. The observed median PFS of 26.9 months was comparable to that seen with chronic lenalidomide maintenance and superior to patients who do not receive lenalidomide maintenance. The improvement in PFS was achieved with a fixed duration rather than continuous therapy and without lenalidomide-associated toxicities such as secondary malignancies, chronic diarrhea, and financial toxicity. Further prospective confirmatory studies are needed. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of a Daltuzumab-containing Regimen in Patients with mSMART High-Risk Multiple Myeloma

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a treatment regimen based on daratumumab in patients with high-risk relapsed refractory multiple myeloma(MM) with mSMART 3.0 score. Clinical data were collected from 16 patients with mSMART3.0 score high-risk relapsed refractory MM treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to May 2023, all of whom received daltezumab-based regimen (regimen drugs including dexamethasone, isazomib, bortezomib, lenalidomide). The efficacy and safety of the treatment were retrospectively analyzed. The median age of 16 patients was 63.5 (47-70) years old, including 10 cases of IgG type, 2 cases of IgA type, and 4 cases of light chain type. The curative efficacy was judged in all 16 patients, with an overall response rate of 93.75% (15/16), including 4 cases of strict complete remission (sCR), 1 case of complete remission (CR), 2 case of very good partial remission (VGPR), partial remission (PR) in 5 cases, and minor remission (MR) in 3 cases. The median follow-up time was 11(2-30) months, and the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not achieved in 16 patients at the median follow-up period. The hematologic adverse effects of the treatment regimen using daratumumab-based were mainly neutropenia, and the non-hematologic adverse effects were mainly infusion-related adverse reactions and infections. Daratumumab-based regimen for the treatment of relapsed refractory MM patients with high risk of mSMART3.0 score has better efficacy and safety.

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel vs standard of care in patients with functional high-risk multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-4 subgroup analysis.

7504 Background: Functional high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with poor prognosis. In CARTITUDE-4, a single ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) infusion significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs established standard of care (SC; hazard ratio [HR], 0.26 [95% CI, 0.18–0.38]; P&lt;.0001) in patients (pts) with lenalidomide (len)-refractory MM after 1–3 prior lines of treatment (tx; LOT). This post hoc subgroup analysis of CARTITUDE-4 reports outcomes for pts who received cilta-cel vs SC as second-line tx, including pts with FHR MM. Methods: Pts randomized to cilta-cel underwent apheresis, received PVd or DPd bridging tx, and then cilta-cel infusion (target dose, 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) 5–7 d after the start of lymphodepletion. Pts randomized to SC received PVd or DPd until progressive disease (PD). FHR was defined as PD within 18 mo after receiving autologous SCT or the start of initial frontline tx. Efficacy was assessed in randomized pts (intent to treat) and safety in pts who received any part of study tx. Results: 136 pts received cilta-cel (n=68) or SC (n=68) as second-line tx. Of these, 79 had FHR MM (cilta-cel, n=40; SC, n=39). Median PFS was longer among pts who received cilta-cel vs SC as second-line tx including the subset who had FHR MM (Table). Overall survival was immature at the time of this analysis. A greater proportion of pts who received cilta-cel vs SC as second-line tx had an overall response, complete response (CR) or better, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and longer median duration of response (DOR), with similar observations among the FHR subset. Proportion of pts with grade ≥3 TEAEs who received cilta-cel vs SC as second-line tx was comparable (96% vs 96%) including the subset with FHR MM (100% vs 97%). Among pts who received second-line tx, 22 died (cilta-cel, n=11; SC, n=11), 16 of whom had FHR MM (n=7; n=9). Conclusions: In pts with len-refractory FHR MM after 1 prior LOT, cilta-cel improved outcomes vs SC and had a safety profile consistent with the known mechanism of action of CAR-T tx, suggesting cilta-cel may overcome the poor prognosis associated with FHR MM. Clinical trial information: NCT04181827 . [Table: see text]

LILRB4 represents a promising target for immunotherapy by dual targeting tumor cells and myeloid-derived suppressive cells in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematological malignancy. Despite tremendous advances in the treatment, about 10% of patients still have very poor outcomes with median overall survival less than 24 months. Our study aimed to underscore the critical mechanisms pertaining to the rapid disease progression and provide novel therapeutic selection for these ultra-high-risk patients. We utilized single-cell transcriptomic sequencing to dissect the characteristic bone marrow niche of patients with survival of less than two years (EM24). Notably, an enrichment of LILRB4high pre-matured plasma-cell cluster was observed in the patients in EM24 compared to patients with durable remission. This cluster exhibited aggressive proliferation and drug-resistance phenotype. High-level LILRB4 promoted MM clonogenicity and progression. Clinically, high expression of LILRB4 was correlated with poor prognosis in both newly diagnosed MM patients and relapsed/refractory MM patients. The ATAC-seq analysis identified that high chromosomal accessibility caused the elevation of LILRB4 on MM cells. CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of LILRB4 alleviated the growth of MM cells, inhibited the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs, and further rescued T cell dysfunction in MM microenvironment. The more infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) was observed in EM24 patients as well. Therefore, we innovatively generated a TCR-based chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell, LILRB4-STAR-T. Cytotoxicity experiment demonstrated that LILRB4-STAR-T cells efficaciously eliminated tumor cells and impeded MDSCs function. In conclusion, our study elucidates that LILRB4 is an ideal biomarker and promising immunotherapy target for high-risk MM. LILRB4-STAR-T cell immunotherapy is promising against tumor cells and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in MM.

Unlocking hope: talquetamab in multiple myeloma treatment: a bispecific breakthrough targeting CD3 and GPRC5D

Multiple myeloma (MM) presents a significant global health burden, with disparities in incidence and outcomes reflecting challenges in recognition and treatment. Talquetamab, a bispecific CD3 T-cell engager targeting G-protein coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), has emerged as a promising immunotherapy for relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). In August 2023, talquetamab received accelerated approval from the US FDA for RRMM treatment, followed by conditional marketing authorization from the EMA. Clinical trials demonstrated talquetamab's efficacy, with overall response rates (ORR) of 69% and 76% in heavily pretreated RRMM patients. The phase I monumenTAL-1 trial showcased talquetamab's effectiveness, particularly in high-risk MM and extramedullary disease, with ORRs around 71-74%. Subsequent phase 2 results reaffirmed its efficacy, even in patients with prior T-cell redirection therapies. Combination therapy with daratumumab further enhanced talquetamab's efficacy, addressing concerns of T cell exhaustion. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed sustained responses and manageable adverse events with subcutaneous administration, facilitating convenient dosing regimens. However, talquetamab carries risks of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicity, necessitating close monitoring and prompt management. Common adverse events included fever, CRS, musculoskeletal pain, and infections, although severe events were infrequent. Vigilant management strategies, including prophylactic measures and supportive care, mitigate these risks. In conclusion, talquetamab represents a significant advancement in RRMM treatment, offering a promising avenue for T-cell redirection therapy. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing and combination strategies, fostering improved outcomes for MM patients. Continued investigation will refine the strategic integration of talquetamab and other immunotherapies, paving the way for enhanced treatment efficacy and patient care in RRMM.

ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DURING VRD CHEMOTHERAPY IN A PATIENT WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA: A CLINICAL CASE

Acute myocardial infarction is a critical condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Myocardial infarction-related acute myocardial injury is characterized by a rapid elevation and subsequent decline in cardiac troponin concentration. According to the relevant data patients with multiple myeloma are in a high-risk category for venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the incidence of cardiovascular complications, which include myocardial infarction, in these patients is higher than in the general population. The development of metaplastic anemia further compounds this risk by diminishing myocardial oxygen supply. Moreover, chemotherapy for oncohematological diseases carries the potential for cardiotoxic cardiovascular complications. Immunomodulator drugs like Thalidomide and Lenalidomide, frequently utilized in multiple myeloma treatment, have been associated with Lenalidomide-induced myocardial infarction—a prevalent adverse effect. The use of proteasome inhibitors such as Bortezomib and Carfilzomib poses an increased risk for myocardial infarction development. This clinical case presents an instance of acute myocardial infarction in a multiple myeloma patient during low cumulative chemotherapy dosage, comprising Lenalidomide and Bortezomib. It underscores the necessity for enhanced clinical, instrumental, and laboratory monitoring before each specific chemotherapy course in high-risk multiple myeloma patients. Such monitoring facilitates the early detection of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxic effects, allowing for timely intervention and management.

Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of high risk multiple myeloma (2024)

High-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) refers to patients with multiple myeloma whose overall survival time is less than 2-3 years under current standardized diagnosis and treatment. By combining various static and dynamic prognostic factors, risk stratification is performed to identify HRMM patients early and treat patients with personalized strategies, with the aim of significantly improving adverse survival outcomes in HRMM patients. Although the clinical value of HRMM has reached a consensus domestically in recent years, there still exist confusions and ambiguities in the definition, high-risk factors, risk stratification, and treatment of HRMM, necessitating standardization. In order to enhance the diagnostic and treatment capabilities of Chinese physicians in HRMM, the Professional Committee of Hematologic Malignancies of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) and the Multiple Myeloma Expert Committee of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) have organized relevant experts to develop this consensus. This consensus aims to clarify the definition of HRMM, high-risk factors, and risk stratification system, and provide treatment recommendations for HRMM, thereby improving the quality of life and prognosis of Chinese HRMM patients.