High-risk Leukemia Research Articles

Automated and closed clinical-grade manufacturing protocol produces potent NK cells against neuroblastoma cells and AML blasts

Natural killer (NK) cells are a promising allogeneic immunotherapy option due to their natural ability to kill tumor cells, and due to their apparent safety. This study describes the development of a GMP-compliant manufacturing protocol for the local production of functionally potent NK cells tailored for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and neuroblastoma (NBL) patients. Moreover, the quality control strategy and considerations for product batch specifications in early clinical development are described. The protocol is based on the CliniMACS Prodigy platform and Natural Killer Cell Transduction (NKCT) (Miltenyi Biotec). NK cells are isolated from leukapheresis through CD3 depletion and CD56 enrichment, followed by a 12-hour activation with IL-2 and IL-15 cytokines. Three CliniMACS Prodigy processes demonstrated the feasibility and consistency of the modified NKCT process. A three-step process without expansion, however, compromised the NK cell yield. T cells were depleted effectively, indicating excellent safety of the product. Characterization of the NK cells before and after cytokine activation revealed a notable increase in the expression of activation markers, particularly CD69, consistent with enhanced functionality. Intriguingly, the NK cells exhibited increased killing efficacy against patient-derived CD33 + AML blasts and NBL cells in vitro, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit in AML and NBL.

A phase 2, multicenter, clinical trial of CPX-351 in older patients with secondary or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: PETHEMA-LAMVYX.

LAMVYX was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial designed to validate the safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in patients aged 60-75 years with newly diagnosed, secondary acute myeloid leukemia and to generate evidence on key issues not addressed in the preceding regulatory pivotal trial. The primary end point of the study was the complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate after induction. Eligible patients were recommended to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after the first consolidation cycle. Alternatively, patients could undergo up to six maintenance cycles with CPX-351. Twenty-nine patients (49%; 95% exact confidence interval [CI], 37%-62%) patients achieved a CR/CRi after one or two cycles of induction, with a measurable residual disease negativity rate of 67% as assessed by centralized, multiparameter flow cytometry. Among patients who had serial next-generation sequencing analyses available, clearance of somatic mutations that were present at diagnosis was achieved in 7 (35%). The median follow-up among survivors was 16.8 months (range, 8.7-24.3 months). The median event-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.4-7.3 months), and the median overall survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-12.7 months). In landmark analyses at day +100 from diagnosis, the 1-year overall and event-free survival rate among patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 70% (95% CI, 47%-100%) and 70% (95% CI, 47%-100%), respectively. The corresponding values were 89% (95% CI, 71%-100%) and 44% (95% CI, 21%-92%), respectively, for patients who entered the maintenance phase. No significant longitudinal changes were observed in severity index or quality-of-life visual analog scale scores. The current data provide novel insights that might inform the clinical positioning and optimal use of CPX-351, complementing previous results (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04230239).

Comparative small molecule screening of primary human acute leukemias, engineered human leukemia and leukemia cell lines.

Targeted therapeutics for high-risk cancers remain an unmet medical need. Here we report the results of a large-scale screen of over 11,000 molecules for their ability to inhibit the survival and growth in vitro of human leukemic cells from multiple sources including patient samples, de novo generated human leukemia models, and established human leukemic cell lines. The responses of cells from de novo models were most similar to those of patient samples, both of which showed striking differences from the cell-line responses. Analysis of differences in subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities made possible by the scale of this screen enabled the identification of new specific modulators of apoptosis, while also highlighting the complex polypharmacology of anti-leukemic small molecules such as shikonin. These findings introduce a new platform for uncovering new therapeutic options for high-risk human leukemia, in addition to reinforcing the importance of the test sample choice for effective drug discovery.

Intensification of upfront chemotherapy for patients with myeloid blast phase CML: a single center experience.

Outcomes for patients with myeloid blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-MBP) are dismal, and no preferred chemotherapy regimen has been identified. Recent studies have suggested a higher response rate with administration of timed-sequenced regimens (TSR) (purine analog, high-dose cytarabine, anthracycline) in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of newly diagnosed CML-MBP patients consecutively treated at our institution with a TSR or standard-dose cytarabine and an anthracycline ("7 + 3") combined with a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) between 2011 and 2023. Endpoints of interest included hematologic response, clinically significant cytogenetic response (CSCR) defined as achieving at least a minor cytogenetic response (Ph + metaphases 0%-≤65%) after induction therapy, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 18 patients with CML-MBP were included of whom 9 (50%) received a TSR and 9 (50%) received "7 + 3". Hematologic response (55.6% vs. 55.6%) and CSCR (25% vs. 37.5%) were similar between TSR- and "7 + 3" treated patients. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic, end-organ toxicity with 33.3% and 11.1% of TSR- and 7 + 3-treated patients, respectively, experiencing at least two. Our data suggests that intensification of upfront chemotherapy does not appear to improve treatment outcomes in CML-MBP patients however, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings involving a larger cohort.

AML typical mutations (CEBPA, FLT3, NPM1) identify a high-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia independent of CPSS molecular

AbstractMutations commonly associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), such as CEBPA, FLT3, IDH1/2, and NPM1, are rarely found in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and their prognostic significance in CMML has not been clearly identified. In 127 patients with CMML, we have retrospectively analyzed next-generation sequencing and polymerase chain reaction data from bone marrow samples collected at the time of CMML diagnosis. Seven patients harbored CEBPA mutations, 8 FLT3 mutations, 12 IDH1 mutations, 26 IDH2 mutations, and 11 NPM1 mutations. Patients with CMML harboring CEBPA, FLT3, and/or NPM1 mutations (mutCFN) more frequently had the myeloproliferative subtype, a high prevalence of severe cytopenia, and elevated blast counts. Regardless of their CMML Prognostic Scoring System molecular classification, mutCFN patients with CMML had a poor prognosis, and the multivariate analysis identified mutCFN as an independent marker of overall survival. The genetic profile of these mutCFN patients with CMML closely resembled that of patients with AML, with higher-risk clinical characteristics. Our findings lead us to suggest including the assessment of these mutations in CMML prognostic models and treating these patients with AML-type therapies, including intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, whenever feasible. Furthermore, certain targeted therapies approved for use in AML should be considered.

Maintenance Therapy Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

High-risk acute myeloid leukemia has been associated with a poor outcome. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the only curative option for eligible patients. Relapse after HSCT is a dramatic event with poor chances of survival. With the aim of reducing the rate of post-HSCT relapse, maintenance treatment has been investigated in this setting. Results from clinical trials suggest an advantage in the use of a maintenance strategy; however, standardized guidelines are not yet available due to the lack of prospective clinical trials. In this review, we have reported the most important strategies adopted as post-HSCT maintenance, highlighting their efficacy, but the current research also opens questions.

Intermittent micafungin dosing schedule in pediatric oncology patients ‐ safe for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy?

IntroductionAntifungal prophylaxis is an important preventative strategy for high-risk pediatric oncology patients. When triazoles are contraindicated, micafungin is an alternative to polyenes, due to improved tolerability and limited drug-drug interactions. An intermittent dosing schedule is advantageous for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but studies assessing safety in pediatric patients are limited. MethodsThis single-centre, retrospective, observational study compared the safety and tolerability of daily (1 mg/kg) and intermittent (3 mg/kg) dosing of amphotericin B liposomal (AmB) and micafungin in children under 18 years, with high-risk leukemia. ResultsOf 51 patients, with 76 individual dosing schedules, hepatoxicity and nephrotoxicity were comparable across all four dosing schedules. Severity of hypokalemia was significantly higher amongst patients receiving AmB (p = 0.041), with higher rates of intravenous electrolyte supplementation required. Infusion-related reactions occurred only in the AmB group (22 %). Intermittent administration and dosing of micafungin was well tolerated, with similar effects on liver function and reduced rates of hypokalemia. ConclusionThis study supports the positive safety profile of intermittent micafungin compared with AmB and describes successful OPAT implementation. Prospective studies assessing efficacy are needed to validate these findings.

Attention and executive functioning in children and adolescents treated for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the Children's Oncology Group (COG).

Survivors of childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are at risk for difficulties with attention and executive functioning (EF) as a late effect of treatment. The present study aimed to identify treatment and demographic factors associated with risk for difficulties with EF in youth treated for high-risk B-ALL. Children and adolescents with B-ALL treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol AALL0232 were randomized to high-dose or escalating-dose methotrexate (MTX), and either dexamethasone or prednisone during the induction phase. Neuropsychological functioning was evaluated via protocol AALL06N1, including performance-based and parent-report measures, for 177 participants (57% female, 81% white; mean age at diagnosis=8.4 years; SD=5.0) 8-24 months following treatment completion. Mean scores for all attention and EF measures were within the average range, with no significant differences as a function of MTX delivery or steroid treatment (all p >0.05). In multivariable models, participants with US public insurance exhibited significantly greater parent-reported EF difficulties than those with US private or non-US insurance (p ≤ 0.05). Additionally, participants diagnosed under 10 years of age performed significantly more poorly on measures of attention (i.e., continuous performance task, p ≤ 0.05) and EF (i.e., verbal fluency and tower planning task, p≤0.05). For survivors of pediatric B-ALL, treatment-related factors were not associated with attention or EF outcomes. In contrast, outcomes varied by demographic characteristics, including age and insurance type, an indicator of economic hardship. Future research is needed to more directly assess the contribution of socioeconomic status on cognitive outcomes in survivors.

Cost-effectiveness of blinatumomab for the treatment of B‑precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia pediatric patients with high‑risk first‑relapse in Mexico

BackgroundBlinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule that engages T cells to lyse CD19-expressing B cells. Based on a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, randomized clinical trial (Clinical Trials ID: NCT02393859), we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab compared to standard consolidation chemotherapy (SC) for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from a Mexico healthcare payer perspective. MethodsA decision-analytic model, a partitioned survival model, was used to estimate the life-years (LYs) and costs over a lifetime horizon. We assumed that patients who remained alive beyond a 5-year period were cured. To account for the lingering impacts of cancer treatment, an excess mortality rate was incorporated into the model. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by fitting mixture-cure and standard parametric survival distributions to the time-to-event data from the phase 3 trial. The model accounted for treatment costs, adverse event costs, follow-up costs, subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) costs, and subsequent treatment costs. ResultsBlinatumomab was associated with a lifetime gained of 5.11 years at an incremental cost of $621,111 MXN, relative to SC. The ICER for blinatumomab vs Standard of care was estimated to be $121,526 MXN/LY gained in the base case. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to varying the time horizon. Blinatumomab had a probability of 99 % of being cost-effective, relative to SC, at the willingness to pay threshold defined in Mexico. LimitationsHealth-related quality of life values were not included in the analysis and therefore we did not estimate the quality-adjusted life-years gained. ConclusionsBlinatumomab was associated with greater benefit in terms of OS and EFS relative to SC. Probabilistic, deterministic, and scenario analyses indicate that blinatumomab represents the best value for money. Therefore, blinatumomab administered as part of consolidation therapy in B-ALL pediatric patients with high-risk first relapse is a cost-effective option.

Treosulfan-Versus Melphalan-Based Reduced Intensity Conditioning in HLA-Haploidentical Transplantation for Patients ≥ 50 Years with Advanced MDS/AML.

Relapse and regimen-related toxicities remain major challenges in achieving long-term survival, particularly among older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of treosulfan-based conditioning, noting stable engraftment and low non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing HLA-matched allo-HSCT. However, data on treosulfan-based conditioning in the HLA-haploidentical transplantation (HaploT) setting are limited. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC)-melphalan (110 mg/m2) and FC-treosulfan (30 g/m2) prior to HaploT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients with high-risk MDS/AML patients ≥ 50 years, transplanted from 2009-2021 at our institution (n = 80). After balancing patient characteristics by a matched-pair analysis, we identified twenty-one matched pairs. Two-year OS and LFS were similar among the groups (OS 66% and LFS 66%, p = 0.8 and p = 0.57). However, FC-melphalan was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FC-treosulfan (0% vs. 24%, p = 0.006), counterbalanced by a higher NRM (33% vs. 10%, p = 0.05). Time to engraftment and incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) did not differ significantly. In conclusion, HaploT using FC-treosulfan in combination with PTCy in patients aged ≥50 years with MDS/AML appears safe and effective, particularly in advanced disease stages. We confirm the favorable extramedullary toxicity profile, allowing for potential dose intensification to enhance antileukemic activity.

Comparison of augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) and BFM 2000 treatment protocols in children diagnosed with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Objectives: The main purpose of this study is comparing the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) and BFM 2000 treatment protocols applied to pediatric patients diagnosed with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in our clinic in different years in terms of relapse incidence and survival rates. Methods: When evaluated all patients considering the Children's Oncology Group (COG) criteria, 53 of our patients who were in the medium or high risk group according to the BFM 2000 protocol and were in the high risk group received treatment with Augmented BFM protocol and 17 of them received the BFM 2000 protocol. Age, gender, bone pathology, physical examination, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, presence of bleeding, hemogram values, immunophenotype, 8th, 14th and 33rd day treatment response, presence of translocation, central nervous system (CNS), extramedullary involvement, risk group, presence of relapse, time to relapse, follow-up period and hospital stay until maintenance treatment were examined. Results: Event-Free Survival (EFS) and Overall Survival (OS) values of patients were 83.6% and 90.1%, respectively. While EFS was 89.4% and OS was 90.6% in the group receiving the Augmented BFM treatment protocol, EFS was calculated as 71.7% and OS was 88.2% in those receiving the BFM-2000 treatment protocol. Accordingly, when the EFS values of those who received the Augmented BFM treatment protocol were compared with those who received BFM-2000, statistically significant values were found (P<0.01). Conclusions: It was observed that the augmented BFM treatment protocol was more protective against relapses and shortened the duration of hospitalization compared to the BFM 2000 treatment protocol.

Disseminated Aspergillus Flavus Infection in High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Case for Early Recognition and Pharmacokinetic Guided Treatment Approach

Disseminated Aspergillus Flavus Infection in High-Risk Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: A Case for Early Recognition and Pharmacokinetic Guided Treatment Approach

Superior survival with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy for high-risk adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a PDT-ALL-2016 pediatric-inspired cohort.

Not available.

A Retrospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Low- or Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the AML-05 Study Conducted by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group

The AML-05 study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic strategy based on risk stratification for low-, intermediate-, or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pediatric patients. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was not indicated for low- or intermediate-risk AML patients in first complete remission. The present retrospective study for the AML-05 study aimed to identify prognostic factors for survival and to determine optimal allo-HCT according to multivariate analysis on overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality for and between low- and intermediate-risk AML group patients in the AML-05 study who had undergone allo-HCT after its completion and relapse. The unique patient numbers (UPNs) of the AML-05 study were matched with the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP)-registered numbers, and the tied data on the AML-05 study's UPNs and the TRUMP-registered numbers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was 3-yr OS. Among 443 AML patients in the AML-05 study, 79 (32 low-risk AML and 47 intermediate-risk AML) were analyzed. The following statistically favorable prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis on the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups, respectively: UCB (OS—hazard ratio [HR], 0.105; 95% CI, 0.011 to 0.941; P = .004 and EFS—HR, 0.065, 95% CI, 0.007 to 0.577, P = .014) and late relapse (OS—HR, 0.212; 95% CI, 0.072 to 0.626; P = .005 and EFS—HR, 0.236; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.630; P = .004). Three-year OS, 3-yr EFS, and 3-yr CIR were significantly different between the low- and intermediate-risk AML groups. UCB may be a safe and beneficial donor source for low-risk AML patients, while late relapse was a favorable prognostic factor for intermediate-risk AML patients. Intermediate-risk AML patients with late relapse and low-risk AML patients may benefit from allo-HCT after relapse.

Cell-Based Treatment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapsed after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only treatment option for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recurrence of leukemic cells after ASCT represents a dramatic event associated with a dismal outcome, with a 2-year survival rate of around 20%. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is a form of cell-based strategy that has emerged as an effective therapy to treat and prevent post-ASCT recurrence. Lymphocytes are the principal cells used in this therapy and can be derived from a hematopoietic stem cell donor, the patient themselves, or healthy donors, after being engineered to express the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T and UniCAR-T). In this review, we discuss recent advances in the established strategy of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and the progress and challenges of CAR-T cells.

Disease-burden-adapted immunotherapy protocol for primary refractory or high-risk relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Disease-burden-adapted immunotherapy protocol for primary refractory or high-risk relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

New precision medicine weapons for targeted treatment of high-risk B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Not available.

Asciminib stands out as the superior tyrosine kinase inhibitor to combine with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of CD20+ Philadelphia-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in preclinical models.

Philadelphia chromosome-positive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ BCPALL) is a high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia subtype characterized by the presence of BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with chemotherapy are established as the first-line treatment. Additionally, rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) is administered in adult BCP-ALL patients with ≥20% of CD20+ blasts. In this study, we observed a marked prevalence of CD20 expression in patients diagnosed with Ph+ BCP-ALL, indicating a potential widespread clinical application of RTX in combination with TKIs. Consequently, we examined the influence of TKIs on the antitumor effectiveness of anti-CD20 mAbs by evaluating CD20 surface levels and conducting in vitro functional assays. All tested TKIs were found to uniformly downregulate CD20 on leukemic cells, diminishing the efficacy of RTX-mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Interestingly, these TKIs displayed varied effects on NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and macrophage phagocytic function. While asciminib demonstrated no inhibition of effector cell functions, dasatinib notably suppressed the anti-CD20-mAb-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity and macrophage phagocytosis of BCP-ALL cells. Dasatinib and ponatinib also decreased NK cell degranulation in vitro. Importantly, oral administration of dasatinib, but not asciminib, compromised NK cell activity within patients' blood, determined by ex vivo degranulation assay. Our results indicate that asciminib might be preferred over other TKIs for combination therapy with anti-CD20 mAbs.

Comparison of allo-SCT, auto-SCT and chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with low- or intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia: a network meta-analysis

BackgroundThe therapeutic status of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) as a post-remission treatment for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was well-accepted. However, the optimal treatment for patients with low/favorable- or intermediate-risk AML who achieve complete remission has remained controversial. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to discuss this disputed problem.MethodsWe compared the effects of treatment strategies including allo-SCT, autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) and consolidation chemotherapy (CT) for patients with low/favorable- or intermediate-risk AML. The pooled HRs and 95% CIs for overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated with Stata12 and R software. Thirty clinical studies with 6682 patients were included in the meta-analysis.ResultsThe results indicated that the treatment outcome of allo-SCT was the best, followed by auto-SCT, and CT was likely the worst in the total AML patients. In patients with low/favorable-risk AML, the treatment outcome of auto-SCT was likely ranked first, followed by allo-SCT, and CT was the worst. In patients with intermediate-risk AML, the treatment outcome of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) was the best, followed by allo-SCT (excluding haplo-SCT), and auto-SCT and CT were the worst. However, the median age of the haplo-SCT group was much younger than that of the control group, which may be one of the reasons for the better prognosis of the haplo-SCT group.ConclusionsPatients with low/favorable- and intermediate-risk (non-high-risk) AML should prioritize allo-SCT if they are eligible for transplantation, and auto-SCT is optional. However, in the subgroup analysis, auto-SCT was the optimal treatment choice for patients with low/favorable-risk AML, and allo-SCT was the priority selection for patients with intermediate-risk AML, especially young patients. These findings could provide references for clinical practice.

TES and SLC40A1 as Potential Biomarkers for Predicting Survival in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Identifying patients with high-risk T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is crucial for personalized therapy; however, the lack of robust biomarkers hinders prognosis assessment. To address this issue, our study aimed to screen and validate genes whose expression may serve as predictive indicators of outcomes in T-ALL patients while also investigating the underlying molecular mechanisms. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between T-ALL patients and healthy controls were identified by integrating data from three independent public datasets. Functional annotation of these DEGs and protein-protein interactions were also conducted. Further, we enrolled a prospective cohort of T-ALL patients (n = 20) at our center, conducting RNA-seq analysis on their bone marrow samples. Survival-based univariate Cox analysis was employed to identify gene expressions related to survival, and an intersection algorithm was sequentially applied. Furthermore, we validated the identified genes using cases from the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments database, plotting Kaplan-Meier curves for secondary validation. Through the integration of survival-related genes with DEGs identified in T-ALL, our analysis revealed six T-ALL-specific genes, the expression levels of which were linked to prognostic value. Notably, the independent prognostic value of SLC40A1 and TES expression levels was confirmed in both an external cohort and a prospective cohort at our center. In summary, our preliminary study indicates that the expression levels of TES and SLC40A1 genes show promise as potential indicators for predicting survival outcomes in T-ALL patients.