High-risk Human Papillomavirus Testing Research Articles

The performance of single and combination test strategies using visual inspection, cytology, high-risk HPV DNA and HPV16/18 to screen South African women with and without HIV-infection

BackgroundCervical cancer screening strategies should ideally be informed by population-specific data. Strategies recommended for secondary prevention, are often inadequately studied in populations with high cervical disease burdens. This report describes the test performance measured against CIN2 + /CIN3 + histology in HIV-positive women (HPW) and HIV-negative women (HNW) with the aim to determine the most effective strategies to identify South African women at risk.MethodsPrimary screening using visual inspection, cytology and HPV DNA (cobas®) was performed in two South African provinces on 456 HPW and 639 HNW participating in the multicentric DiaVACCS trial. Histology was obtained for 91.7% screen-positive and 42.7% screen-negative participants, and unavailable histology was determined by multiple imputation to adjust for verification bias. Cross-sectional test performance was calculated for single and combination test strategies with and without intermediate risk categories using different cut-offs. Minimum acceptability for sensitivity and specificity, treatment and follow-up numbers were considered to evaluate strategies.ResultsThe only single test to reach acceptability in HPW was cytology (LSIL) [sensitivity 71.2%; specificity 90.5%; treatment 33.4%]; in HNW only HPV (hr) qualified [sensitivity 68.2%; specificity 85.2%; treatment 23.5%]. The universally best performing strategy which also resulted in smaller treatment numbers without intermediate risk group was primary HPV(hr), with treatment of both HPV(16/18) and cytology (ASCUS +) [HPW: sensitivity 73.6%; specificity 89.7%; treatment 34.7%. HNW: sensitivity 59.1%; specificity 93.6%; treatment 13.9%].DNA testing for hrHPV (any) and hrHPV (16/18) was the best universally acceptable strategy with an intermediate risk category (early follow-up) in HPW [sensitivity 82.1%; specificity 96.4%; treatment 17.1%; follow-up 31.4%] and HNW [sensitivity 68.2%; specificity 96.7%; treatment 7.6%; follow-up 15.9%]. In comparison, using both HPV (16/18) and cytology (ASCUS +) as secondary tests in hrHPV positive women, decreased follow-up [HPW 13.8%, HNW 9.6%], but increased treatment [HPW 34.7%, HNW 13.9%].ConclusionUsing hrHPV (any) as primary and both HPV16/18 and cytology as secondary tests, was universally acceptable without an intermediate risk group. Strategies with follow-up groups improved screening performance with smaller treatment numbers, but with effective management of the intermediate risk group as prerequisite.

Prognostic outcome of cervical laser ablation using a holmium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A single-center retrospective study

ObjectiveAlthough cervical conization is considered a standard treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3, laser ablation can compensate for the disadvantages of the former. CO2, semiconductor, and holmium yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) lasers are applied in ablation, but no previous studies have shown the effectiveness of any of these techniques. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the application of the Ho:YAG laser in our hospital to verify its efficacy, and discussed the methods for optimal recurrence detection. MethodsWe evaluated the recurrence rates of the pathological condition in patients who underwent laser ablation with a Ho:YAG laser for CIN2/3 at our institution from June 2012 to November 2021. We defined the recurrence as histologically confirmed CIN2 or more advanced stage. Age, preoperative diagnosis, human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype, and postoperative high-risk HPV status were recorded to establish their association with recurrence rates. ResultsWe performed surgery in 607 patients and the 2-year recurrence rate after interventions was 5.6%. Five patients were diagnosed with invasive cancer at the time of recurrence. Older age significantly correlated with higher risk of recurrence, but preoperative CIN grade and preoperative HPV 16/18 status did not significantly affect it. The postoperative high-risk HPV test was 100% sensitive for detecting recurrence. ConclusionsLaser ablation with the Ho:YAG laser yields promising results. Together with postinterventional management, high-risk HPV test after laser ablation should be conducted after diagnostic conization.This study received the approval from the Ethics Committee of the NHO Tokyo Medical Center (Ethics Committee approval number: R22-067).

HPV genotyping in clinical samples using long-read single-molecule real-time sequencing.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping is widely used, particularly in combination with high-risk (HR) HPV tests for cervical cancer screening. We developed a genotyping method using sequences of approximately 800 bp in the E6/E7 region obtained by PacBio single molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT) and evaluated its performance against MY09-11 L1 sequencing and after the APTIMA HPV genotyping assay. The levels of concordance of PacBio E6/E7 SMRT sequencing with MY09-11 L1 sequencing and APTIMA HPV genotyping were 100% and 90.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of PacBio E6/EA7 SMRT was slightly greater than that of L1 sequencing and, as expected, lower than that of HR-HPV tests. In the context of cervical cancer screening, PacBio E6/E7 SMRT is then best used after a positive HPV test. PacBio E6/E7 SMRT genotyping is an attractive alternative for HR and LR-HPV genotyping of clinical samples. PacBio SMRT sequencing provides unbiased genotyping and can detect multiple HPV infections and haplotypes within a genotype.

Clinical vaginal-microecology testing using double-fluorescence staining in patients with high-risk human papillomavirus infection

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is associated with cervical cancer; imbalanced vaginal microecology may contribute to HPV progression. Currently used methods for clinical vaginal-microecology (CVM) testing are associated with several disadvantages, such as low accuracy and complicated operation. This retrospective study presents a novel testing method to examine vaginal microecology via double-fluorescence staining and explores the relationship between hrHPV and CVM. We analyzed 1242 patients who underwent hrHPV testing at our hospital over a two-month period; of these, 695 also underwent clinical vaginal-microecology testing (CVMT). Patients underwent routine leukorrhea detection (n=322), functional testing (n=277), and our novel double-fluorescence staining-based CVMT approach (n=376). Patients with hrHPV exhibited more epithelial cells, miscellaneous bacteria, and hyphae than those without hrHPV on double-fluorescence staining-based CVMT approach. Double-fluorescence staining was effective in identifying indicators of hrHPV infection and may serve as an auxiliary tool for clinical hrHPV screening.

Evaluation of dual p16/Ki-67 immunostaining on anal cytology specimens.

Dual immunostaining for p16/Ki67 is FDA-approved for use on liquid-based cervical cytology specimens; however, the utility of dual staining in anal cytology especially for ASCUS risk stratification is not well established. We investigated dual staining performance on anal cytology specimens and correlated with subsequent cytologic interpretation, high-risk HPV status, and anal biopsy results. Dual staining for p16/Ki-67 was performed on all liquid-based anal cytology specimens from December 2021 to June 2022 (n = 43). Three patients had high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL/AIN2-3) on biopsy; dual staining was positive in all three cases. All HR-HPV negative cases were negative for dual staining. Among the 12 ASCUS samples with subsequent anal biopsy results all also had HR-HPV testing. Due to small sample size of cases with squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) diagnosed on biopsy, the sensitivity and positive predictive value was not calculated. However, the specificity and negative predictive value of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 1 (95% CI: 0.66-1) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.65-0.97) respectively, whereas the specificity and negative predictive value of HR-HPV testing for SIL of any grade on biopsy were 0.44 (95% CI: 0.14-0.79) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.41-0.96) respectively. Dual p16/Ki-67 staining indicates transforming HPV infection and could help serve as an ancillary test for risk stratification for atypical anal cytology specimens. Among ASCUS samples, dual staining was specific for SIL of any grade with a high negative predictive value and therefore could be useful in clinical practices with limited availability for follow-up care.

Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial.

To evaluate the sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV) tested urine to detect high-grade cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) using two urine collection devices. Randomised controlled trial. St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. Colposcopy attendees with abnormal cervical screening; a total of 480 participants were randomised. Matched urine and cervical samples were available for 235 and 230 participants using a first-void urine (FVU)-collection device and standard pot, respectively. Urine was self-collected and mixed with preservative - randomised 1:1 to FVU-collection device (Novosanis Colli-pee® 10 mL with urine conservation medium [UCM]) or standard pot. Matched clinician-collected cervical samples were taken before colposcopy. HPV testing used Roche cobas® 8800. A questionnaire evaluated urine self-sampling acceptability. The primary outcome measured sensitivity of HPV-tested urine (FVU-collection device and standard pot) for CIN2+ detection. Secondary outcomes compared HPV-tested cervical and urine samples for CIN2+ and evaluated the acceptability of urine self-sampling. Urine HPV test sensitivity for CIN2+ was higher with the FVU-collection device (90.3%, 95% CI 83.7%-94.9%, 112/124) than the standard pot (73.4%, 95% CI 64.7%-80.9%, 91/124, p = 0.0005). The relative sensitivity of FVU-device-collected urine was 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.97, pMcN = 0.004) compared with cervical, considering that all women were referred after a positive cervical HPV test. Urine-based sampling was acceptable to colposcopy attendees. Testing of FVU-device-collected urine for HPV was superior to standard-pot-collected urine in colposcopy attendees and has promising sensitivity for CIN2+ detection. General population HPV testing of FVU-device-collected urine will establish its clinical performance and acceptability as an alternative to routine cervical screening.

Understanding of cervical cancer, acceptability of HPV self-collection, and prevalence of HPV in a semi-urban setting in Bangladesh.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling has been implemented successfully as an alternative to traditional forms of cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. Through Bangladesh's current national cervical cancer screening program, only about 10% of the at-risk population is reached. Thus, Bangladesh is an ideal setting to consider HPV self-sampling to improve cervical cancer prevention efforts. However, the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling has not been evaluated in Bangladesh. We aimed to understand levels of HPV and cervical cancer knowledge and to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in a semi-urban Bangladeshi community. Participants were recruited from a local clinic; 164 women completed a cross-sectional questionnaire about attitudes towards screening, and cervical cancer and HPV risk factor knowledge, and provided self-collected cervical samples for high-risk HPV testing. Of the participants, 4.3% tested positive for high-risk HPV and were referred for appropriate follow-up care. Nearly all participants had heard of cervical cancer, though specific knowledge was quite low. Self-sampling for high-risk HPV testing had high rates of acceptability, high rates of convenience, and very little discomfort and embarrassment reported in this study population, making implementing HPV self-sampling as a form of cervical cancer screening in Bangladesh appear feasible.

The Incidence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cervical Cancer in Women Referred With Postcoital Bleeding.

The incidence of cervical cancer among patients with postcoital bleeding (PCB) was the primary objective of this study. Furthermore, the proportion of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia requiring treatment and the correlation between PCB and the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) was determined. Lastly, the study aimed to identify risk factors among the referred women. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Denmark between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Women referred with PCB were identified with the ICD diagnosis codes "DN930 Postcoital and contact bleeding" and "DN930B Contact bleeding." Demographic and paraclinical data were extracted from the journals and the supportive systems: Patoweb and the Danish Microbiology Database. A total of 789 women were included in this study, with only 0.25% (n = 2) diagnosed with cervical cancer and 2.5% (n = 20) diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III and adenocarcinoma in situ. Human papillomavirus testing was only conducted in a minority of cases, and a low incidence of high-risk human papilloma virus was detected in the 22 cases, n = 5. A very low incidence of cervical cancer and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia reported among women referred with PCB. Prognostic factors as body mass index, smoking, and HPV vaccination status may predict the risk of cervical cancer. Selection criteria like primary testing for hrHPV and cytology as cotests before referral to colposcopy may reduce the number of unnecessary colposcopies.

Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study

Objective To examine the prevalence of infections with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical dysplasia, and the clearance rate of HPV infections, in users of different kinds of intrauterine devices (IUDs) and other contraceptive methods. Methods A cross-sectional register-based study including 16,181 women aged 30–49 years participating in the screening programme for cervical cancer in a Swedish County in 2017–2018. Data on contraception from screening records was paired with the HPV test results, cytological and histological follow-up tests and subsequent HPV test. Results There was no difference in the risk of being HPV positive, or histological HSIL+, between users of copper-containing IUDs and women with no reported use of contraception. Use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hormonal contraception were associated with higher odds for HPV infection in age-adjusted models (aOR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.41, and aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.22–1.63, respectively) and for HSIL+ (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.02–2.06, and aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.13–2.16, respectively). No significant differences were found in HPV clearance rates. Conclusions Reported use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and hormonal contraception, but not use of copper IUD, was associated with a higher prevalence of HPV infections and histological HSIL + compared to no reported use of contraception.

Comparing Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies in an Incarcerated Population.

Objective: To describe the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection, and cervical cancer in a high-risk, underscreened incarcerated population and to evaluate the performance of current cervical cancer screening options to detect cervical precancer (CIN 2/3) in this population. Study Design: Deidentified data were obtained from all cytological, hrHPV DNA, and histopathological testing of cervical biopsies performed on people incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. These were linked to corresponding demographic data. The proportions of histopathological diagnoses of CIN2+ and CIN3+ immediately preceded by abnormal cytology testing or hrHPV testing were determined, and prevalence differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: A total of 15,319 individuals incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women had at least one cytology result during 2013-2020. Of these, 2,829 (18%) had abnormal cervical cytology, and 3,724 (24.3%) had positive hrHPV testing. The detection of CIN2+ was 95.9% by preceding abnormal cervical cytology, 89.9% by preceding positive hrHPV testing (p = 0.03), and 96.5% by preceding positive co-testing. The detection rate of CIN3+ was 96.6% by preceding abnormal cervical cytology, 90.8% by preceding positive hrHPV testing (p = 0.12), and 96.6% by positive co-testing. Conclusion: In our sample, primary cytology and co-testing detected CIN2+ at higher rates when compared with primary hrHPV testing. This reinforces that incarcerated populations do not fall into average-risk populations for which current cervical cancer screening options are designed, which should be considered when performing screening in this population.

EPR24-116: Improving Anal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Analysis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Tests, Alone or in Combination With Anal Cytology Assays, to Predict High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

EPR24-116: Improving Anal Cancer Screening: A Comparative Analysis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Tests, Alone or in Combination With Anal Cytology Assays, to Predict High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.

Prevalence of High-Risk HPV Detection and HPV Vaccination in Cervical Cancer Screening During the HPV Vaccination Era at Siriraj Hospital - Thailand's Largest National Tertiary Referral Center.

To investigate the prevalence of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV vaccination among women undergoing cervical cancer screening during the HPV vaccination era at Siriraj Hospital - Thailand's largest national tertiary referral center. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at our center's outpatient gynecology clinic during September-December 2021. Women aged ≥18 years with no previous hysterectomy, no history of preinvasive or invasive cervical cancer, and no current pregnancy who visited for cervical cancer screening were eligible for enrollment. Women with abnormal vaginal discharge/bleeding, and specimens with inadequate cellularity were excluded. We collected sociodemographic data, history of HPV vaccination, cervical cytology results, and high-risk HPV testing results. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to determine HPV genotype. A total of 216 women (mean age: 41.7 years (range: 25-65), 75.9% premenopausal) were enrolled. Twenty of 216 (9.3%) women tested positive for HR-HPV, and 15 of 216 (6.9%) women had been previously vaccinated for HPV. The most common HPV genotypes detected were Group B infection (HPV 35/39/51/56/59/66/68) (38.9%), followed by HPV16 (27.78%), Group A infection (HPV 31/33/52/58) (27.8%), and HPV18 (5.56%). No HPV45 infection was detected. The detection rate of cytologic abnormalities was 4.16%. Three-quarters (77.8%) of patients with cytologic abnormalities were HR-HPV positive. Among the 216 women who underwent cervical cancer screening in this study, there was a 9.3% prevalence of HR-HPV infection, and a 6.9% prevalence of HPV vaccination. Among the 15 vaccinated women, 2 tested positive for HPV16 (1 normal cytology, 1 abnormal cytology).

Colposcopy referral and CIN3+ risk of human papillomavirus genotyping strategies in cervical cancer screening.

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-based cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands led to a substantial increase in number of colposcopy referrals and low-grade lesions detected. Genotyping strategies may be employed to lower the screening-related burden. We evaluated fourteen triage strategies with genotyping (HPV16/18 or HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58) for hrHPV-positive borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) or normal cytology, using data from a population-based hrHPV-based screening trial with 5-year interval (POBASCAM). We considered colposcopy referral at baseline, after 6-month repeat cytology and after 5-year hrHPV testing. Performance was evaluated by one-round positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) for CIN3+ and by two-round colposcopy referral rate. To identify efficient strategies, they were ordered by the one-round colposcopy referral rate. Adjacent strategies were compared by the marginal PPV for detecting one additional CIN3+ (mPPV). The most conservative strategy (repeat cytology after BMD and HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58-positive normal cytology, next round otherwise) yielded an mPPV of 28%, NPV of 98.2%, and colposcopy rate of 47.2%. Adding direct referral after BMD or genotype-positive BMD yielded an mPPV≤8.2%, NPV≥98.5% and an increase in colposcopy rate of 1.9-6.5%. Adding direct referral after HPV16/18-positive normal cytology yielded an mPPV≤3.5%, NPV≥99.5% and an increase in colposcopy rate of 13.9%. Direct colposcopy referral of women with BMD or normal cytology is unlikely to be efficient, but genotype-guided direct referral after BMD may be considered because the increase in colposcopies is limited. HrHPV screening programs can become very efficient when immediate colposcopy referral is limited to women at highest CIN3+ risk.

The distribution of hrHPV genotypes among cervical cancer cases diagnosed across Ghana: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe burden of cervical cancer in Ghana is high due to a lack of a national screening and vaccination program. Geographical variations in high-risk Human Papilloma Virus incidence and type should be considered for vaccine improvement and screening in LMICs.MethodsA descriptive, multi-center cross-sectional study with purposive sampling of cases with cervical cancer diagnosed from January 2012 through to December 2018 was employed relying on archived Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissues from four (4) Teaching Hospitals. Cervical cancers were assessed for histopathological features following WHO guidelines. In addition, the novel Tumour Budding and Nest Size Grade (TBNS) for SCC, SILVA pattern of invasion for EAC and Tumour Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed. High Risk HPV testing was performed using an isothermal, multiplex nucleic acid amplification method from ATILA biosystem (Mountain View California, USA). The FFPE blocks were tested for 15 hrHPV genotypes. Results were analyzed using SPSS v.26.0, with descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation and chi-square tests done with significance established at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of 297 cases were identified for the study with ages ranging from 20 to 95 years. The peak age group for cervical cancer was 46 to 55 years. For those tested, hrHPV positivity rate was 85.4% [EAC (84.6%) and SCC (85.6%)]. The top five hrHPV serotypes for both histological cancers were 59 (40.0%), 35 (32.0%), 18 (30.0%), 16 (15.0%), and 33 (10.0%) respectively. Approximately, 58.2% of infections were multiple. Single hrHPV infections were mostly caused by hrHPV 59 (28.9%), and 16 (26.3%). TBNS grade for SCC, SILVA pattern of invasion for EAC and TILs did not show any statistically significant relationship with hrHPV.ConclusionWe affirm reported differences in hrHPV types associated with cervical cancer in Ghana with hrHPV types such as 59, 35, and 33 forming a significant proportion of hrHPV types associated with cervical cancer. This difference in hrHPV types should guide vaccine improvement and triaging of hrHPV positives. Though multiple infections are more common, some hrHPV types such as hrHPV 16 and 59 are responsible for most single infections associated with cervical cancer. Simple haematoxylin and eosin-based morphological assessments can improve the prognostication of patients with cervical cancer.

Validation of the VisionArray® Chip Assay for HPV DNA Testing in Histology Specimens of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) has several implications in the diagnostic work-up and management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The choice of HPV detection assay and testing algorithms differ across institutions and vary in cost, detection targets, technical feasibility, and turnaround time. In this study, we aimed to validate the VisionArray® HPV Chip for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of OPSCC using the previously applied standard pan-HPV DNA PCR assay as a reference.MethodsThe validation cohort consisted of FFPE tissue samples from patients previously diagnosed with HPV DNA-positive OPSCC (n = 80), HPV DNA-negative OPSCC (n = 21), and a benign group of tumor samples consisting of Warthin’s tumors (n = 20) and branchial cleft cysts of the lateral neck (n = 14). All samples were tested with p16 immunohistochemistry, pan-HPV DNA PCR, and the VisionArray® HPV Chip.ResultsThe overall sensitivity and specificity of the VisionArray® HPV Chip assay were 100% [95% CI 95.5%; 100.0%] and 96.3% [95% CI 87.3%; 99.6%] and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 97.6% [95% CI 91.5%; 99.7%] and 100% [95% CI 93.2%; 100%], respectively.ConclusionsThe VisionArray® HPV Chip assay can be recommended for high-risk HPV testing in FFPE tissue samples from OPSCC, providing both a fast and simultaneous genotyping for 41 clinically relevant HPV types.

Performance of a vaginal self-collection device versus clinician collected cervical samples for the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus

ObjectiveScreening for cervical cancer requires the participation of target women. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be performed on vaginal self-samples and self-sampling can improve this participation. This study aims to validate the performance of the vaginal self-sampling device (Vitroveil®) to detect high risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in comparison to clinician collected samples and evaluate the degree of acceptability of the Vitroveil® device. MethodsA cross-sectional observational study was carried out in a cohort of 385 participating women (median age of 44 ± 10.47 years) attending primary care centers and cervical pathology services of Granada, Spain. Two paired samples (vaginal self-sample and clinician collected cervical sample) where collected from each participant to compare the detection of HPV with the Vitro HPV Screening assay (Vitro, Granada, Spain). A questionnaire was also provided to the participants to analyze the degree of satisfaction with the device and the preference for sampling method. ResultsOverall concordance for hrHPV detection was substantial (ĸ 0.804). The prevalence of any hrHPV infection was higher in self-collected samples (30.6%) than in clinician-collected samples (24.3%). The participants found the self-sampling device easy to use and preferred self-collection as the collection method. ConclusionThe Vitroveil® self-sampling device enables safe and accruable hrHPV testing, obtaining equivalent results to those of the clinician collected samples. High acceptability of the device has been demonstrated among women in the study. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to verify the efficacy and reliability of the device's performance.

PAX1 and SOX1 gene methylation as a detection and triage method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis.

Methylation assays have demonstrated potential as dependable and high-precision approaches for identifying or triaging individuals with cervical cancer (CA) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Our investigation aimed to assess the efficacy of diagnosis and triage of the PAX1/SOX1 methylation panel in detecting CIN or CA. A total of 461 patients with abnormal high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) or cytology test results were recruited for this study. Each patient underwent an assortment of assessments comprising cytology test, hrHPV test, colposcopy examination, and PAX1 and SOX1 methylation test. The extent of methylation of both genes demonstrates a positive correlation with the severity of CIN lesions and CA. To determine the correlation for patients with CIN2 or worse (CIN2+), the area under curve (AUC) was 0.821 (95%CI 0.782-0.853) for PAX1 and 0.800 (95%CI 0.766-0.838) for SOX1, while for CIN3 or worse (CIN3+),0.881 (95%CI 0.839-0.908) for PAX1 and 0.867 (95% 0.830-0.901) for SOX1. The PAX1/SOX1 methylation marker panel performed sensitivity and specificity of 77.16% and 91.67% for CIN2+, 84.76% and 90.50% for CIN3+, respectively. Regarding triaging hrHPV+ patients, the PAX1/SOX1 methylation test only referred 11.83% of the patients who are unnecessary for coloscopy examination, which is comparatively lower than cytology， thereby signifying a promising triage strategy for hr-HPV positive women. Furthermore, we observed that the positive PAX1/SOX1 methylation test result for untreated CIN1 or less patients would result in a higher likelihood of progression upon a 24-month follow-up visit. The present investigation demonstrates that the PAX1/SOX1 methylation marker panel exhibits a favorable diagnostic performance in CIN detection and holds the potential to be employed for individual CIN tests or hrHPV-positive triage.

Abstract 2142: Spatial distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) across 23 Chicago community areas and correlates

Abstract Background: Despite availability of effective vaccines and screening, cervical cancer claimed 4,280 lives in 2022. We explored the spatial distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (“HR-HPV”) infection across 23 Chicago Community Areas (CCAs) served by the University of Illinois Health Network (UI Health). Using a modified Warnecke et al Health Disparity Outcomes (HDO) model, we hypothesized that CCAs with higher rates of structural violence, the social, economic, and political systems exposing populations to risks and vulnerabilities, would correlate with increased HR-HPV. Methods: Electronic medical records of patients receiving routine cervical cancer screening between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 were reviewed. As per the 2014 ACS guidelines. HR-HPV test results were captured as HR-HPV positive, HR-HPV-16, HR-HPV-18 and non-16/18 HR-HPV, the latter consisting of 12 HR-HPV subtypes. Structural violence variables were used from Chicago Health Atlas (2015-2019) with percent poverty, hardship index score, easy access to fruit and vegetables, routine checkup, homicide, and primary care provider across CCAS. Univariate Poisson regression was used to compare the associations between selected structural violence factors and HR-HPV prevalence. Univariate multinomial logistic regression evaluated associations between structural violence indicators and HR-HPV subtypes Global p-values were obtained using ANOVA at 0.05 significance. Results: 8,566 women met inclusion criteria out of 13,466 total women. 75% were Black or Hispanic. Overall prevalence of cervical HR-HPV infection was 20.3% (n=1,737), ranging from 8.7% to 27.2% across CCAs. Median age for women was 36. Percent with primary care provider was negatively associated with HPV infection (IRR = 0.99 with 95% CI (0.98, 1.00), adjusted p-value=0.023), indicating women living in CCAs with higher rates of primary care provider were less likely to have HR-HPV. Easy access to fruit and vegetables (adjusted p-value = 0.007) and percent with primary care provider (adjusted p-value = 0.009) were significantly associated with HR-HPV subtypes. Women living in CCAs with easy access to fruit and vegetables (OR = 0.99, with 95% CI (0.98,0.99)) as well as those with higher rates of primary care provider (OR = 0.98, with 95% CI (0.97,0.99)) were less likely to have non-16/18 HR-HPV. Conclusion: HR-HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, and most women clear the infection naturally. As the origin of 99% of cervical cancer, understanding the reasons HR-HPV persists and progresses to cancer among certain individuals and groups is critical. Novel interventions like increasing access to fruit and vegetables could compliment widely available and effective vaccines. Citation Format: Gelila Goba, Jiehuan Sun, Quetzal Class, Joel Schwartz, Sage Kim, Karriem Watson, Lisa Tussing-Hummphreys, Yamile Molina, Shannon MacLaughlan, Ziqiao Xu, Benjamin Aldred, Subhash Kumar Kolar Rajanna, Tamika Alexander, Anna-Barbara Moscicki. Spatial distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) across 23 Chicago community areas and correlates [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2142.

Abstract 3942: Mailed at-home self-sampling for HPV testing increases screening participation among under-screened patients in a U.S. safety net health system: Results of the PRESTIS trial

Abstract Background: In global settings, self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is associated with a pooled 2-fold increase in cervical cancer screening participation over usual care among underscreened persons. The Prospective Evaluation of Self-Testing to Increase Screening (PRESTIS) Trial is the first pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the U.S. to evaluate the effectiveness of mailed at-home self-sampling for HPV testing in a safety net health system setting. Safety net systems provide care to medically underserved individuals at elevated cervical cancer risk. We hypothesized that patients who were mailed a self-sampling kit would have greater screening participation compared with those receiving usual care; and that patient navigation, a patient-centered intervention to address barriers to care, would further increase participation. Methods: PRESTIS is a three-arm pragmatic RCT of n=2,270 patients in a U.S. safety net health system who are under-screened for cervical cancer (i.e., no Pap in 3.5 years or Pap/HPV co-test in 5.5 years). Eligible participants were identified through the electronic health record (EHR) and randomized to arms: 1) telephone recall to provider-performed screening (usual care); 2) telephone recall + mailed self-sampling kit for HPV testing; or 3) telephone recall + mailed self-sampling kit + telephone-based patient navigation. Self-sampled swabs were tested for high-risk (HR)-HPV. HR-HPV+ patients were navigated to clinical follow-up. The primary outcome, incidence of screening participation, was ascertained by EHR review at 6 months post-randomization and defined as return of a completed kit or attendance for provider-performed screening. Results: Participants were enrolled 02/2020-08/2023. Primary outcomes have been ascertained for n=2,115 participants. Participants were predominantly Hispanic/Latina (68.6%); 53.4% indicated Spanish as primary language; and 60.3% were uninsured. Mean age was 47.9 years (SD: 10.4 years); median time since last screening test was 9.5 years (range: 1.6-21.7 years). In intent-to-treat analyses, screening participation was 15.3% (95% CI 13.0% - 17.9%) in Arm 1; 44.0% (40.4% - 47.6%) in Arm 2; and 51.4% (47.7% - 55.0%) in Arm 3. Relative incidence of screening in Arms 2 and 3 versus Arm 1 was 2.90 (2.42 - 3.47) and 3.36 (2.82 - 4.01), respectively. Relative incidence of screening in Arm 3 versus Arm 2 was 1.16 (1.04 - 1.29). Conclusion: Compared with usual care, mailed at-home self-sampling increased screening participation among an under-screened population by almost three-fold when used alone and over 3.3-fold when combined with telephone-based patient navigation. After FDA approval, self-sampling for HR-HPV testing has the potential to dramatically increase participation in cervical cancer screening in underserved populations. Citation Format: Jane R. Montealegre, Elizabeth Y. Chiao, Matthew L. Anderson, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, Shaun Bulsara, Susan L. Parker, Maria Daheri, Trisha L. Amboree, Kathleen M. Schmeler, Maria L. Jibaja-Weiss, Mohammad Zare, Ashish A. Deshmukh, Michael E. Scheurer. Mailed at-home self-sampling for HPV testing increases screening participation among under-screened patients in a U.S. safety net health system: Results of the PRESTIS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3942.

Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes in Women with In Situ/Microinvasive Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Undergoing Conservative Treatment-Cervical Adenocarcinoma Study Group Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology.

The present study aimed to assess long-term follow-up outcomes in women with in situ/microinvasive adenocarcinoma (AC) of the uterine cervix treated conservatively. Retrospective multi-institutional study including women with early glandular lesions and 5-year follow-up undergoing fertility-sparing treatment. Independent variables associated with recurrence were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Logrank test were performed. Of 269 women diagnosed with in situ/microinvasive AC, 127 participants underwent conservative treatment. During follow-up, recurrences were found in nine women (7.1%). The only factor associated with recurrence during follow-up was positive high-risk Human Papillomavirus (hr-HPV) testing (odds ratio 6.21, confidence interval 1.47-26.08, p = 0.012). HPV positivity in follow-up showed a recurrence rate of 21.7% against 3.8% in patients who were HPV-negative (p = 0.002, Logrank test). Among women with negative high-risk HPV tests in follow-up, recurrences occurred in 20.0% of non-usual-type histology vs. 2.1% of usual-type cases (p = 0.005). HPV testing in follow-up is of pivotal importance in women with early glandular lesions undergoing conservative treatment, given its recurrence predictive value. However, women who are high-risk HPV-negative in follow-up with non-usual-type histopathology may represent a sub-population at increased risk of recurrences. Further studies should confirm these findings.