High-resolution Manometry Studies Research Articles

Parkinson's disease is associated with low striated esophagus contractility potentially contributing to the development of dysphagia.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and more than 80% of PD patients will develop oropharyngeal dysphagia. Despite its striated histology, proximity to airway, and potential negative impact of its dysfunction on bolus transport and airway safety, the contractile function of the striated esophagus in PD patients has not been systematically studied. Using our repository of clinical manometry and the Milwaukee ManoBank, we analyzed high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies of 20 PD patients, mean age 69.1 (range 38-87 years); 30 non-PD patients with dysphagia, mean age 64.0 (44-86 years); and 32 healthy volunteers, mean age 65.3 (39-86 years). Patients with abnormal findings based on Chicago Classification 4.0 were identified. Repeat analysis was performed in 20% of the manometric tracings by a different investigator with inter-rater concordance between 0.91 and 0.99. The striated esophageal contractile integral in PD patients was significantly lower than that in non-PD dysphagic patients and healthy controls (p = 0.03 and <0.01, respectively). This significant difference persisted after excluding patients with concurrent Chicago Classification motility disorders (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). In both analyses, the distal esophageal contractile integral did not show any significant difference between groups (p = 0.58 and 0.93, respectively). PD is associated with a significant decrease in striated esophagus contractility compared to non-PD and healthy controls. This finding may play a pathophysiologic role in development of dysphagia in this patient population.

Esophageal motor disorders across ages: A retrospective multicentric analysis.

Age-related changes in the gastrointestinal system are common and may be influenced by physiological aging processes. To date, a comprehensive analysis of esophageal motor disorders in patients belonging to various age groups has not been adequately reported. We conducted a retrospective assessment of high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies in a multicenter setting. HRM parameters were evaluated according to the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical data, and main manometric parameters, were collected at the time of the examination. Age groups were categorized as early adulthood (<35 years), early middle-age (35-49 years), late middle-age (50-64 years), and late adulthood (≥65 years). Overall, 1341 patients (632, 47.0% male) were included with a median age of 55 years. Late adulthood patients reported more frequently dysphagia (35.2%) than early adulthood patients (24.0%, p = 0.035), early middle-age patients (21.0%, p < 0.0001), and late middle-aged patients (22.7%, p < 0.0001). Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction was more prevalent in late adulthood (16.7%) than in early adulthood (6.1%, p = 0.003), and in early middle-age (8.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with normal esophageal motility were significantly younger (52.0 years) than patients with hypercontractile esophagus (61.5 years), type III achalasia (59.6 years), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (59.4 years), absent contractility (57.2 years), and distal esophageal spasm (57.0 years), in multivariate model (p < 0.0001). The rate of esophageal motor disorders is higher in older patients, in particular esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm our results and to find tailored strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Enhancing Chicago Classification diagnoses with functional lumen imaging probe-mechanics (FLIP-MECH).

Esophageal motility disorders can be diagnosed by either high-resolution manometry (HRM) or the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) but there is no systematic approach to synergize the measurements of these modalities or to improve the diagnostic metrics that have been developed to analyze them. This work aimed to devise a formal approach to bridge the gap between diagnoses inferred from HRM and FLIP measurements using deep learning and mechanics. The "mechanical health" of the esophagus was analyzed in 740 subjects including a spectrum of motility disorder patients and normal subjects. The mechanical health was quantified through a set of parameters including wall stiffness, active relaxation, and contraction pattern. These parameters were used by a variational autoencoder to generate a parameter space called virtual disease landscape (VDL). Finally, probabilities were assigned to each point (subject) on the VDL through linear discriminant analysis (LDA), which in turn was used to compare with FLIP and HRM diagnoses. Subjects clustered into different regions of the VDL with their location relative to each other (and normal) defined by the type and severity of dysfunction. The two major categories that separated best on the VDL were subjects with normal esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and those with EGJ obstruction. Both HRM and FLIP diagnoses correlated well within these two groups. Mechanics-based parameters effectively estimated esophageal health using FLIP measurements to position subjects in a 3-D VDL that segregated subjects in good alignment with motility diagnoses gleaned from HRM and FLIP studies.

Brief guidelines for beginners on how to perform and analyze esophageal high-resolution manometry

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a diagnostic tool for surgeons, gastroenterologists and other healthcare professionals to evaluate esophageal physiology. The Chicago Classification (CC) system is based on a consensus of worldwide experts to minimize ambiguity in HRM data acquisition and diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The most updated version, CCv4.0, was published in 2021; however, it does not provide step-by-step guidelines (i.e., for beginners) on how to assess the most important HRM metrics. This paper aims to summarize the basic guidelines for conducting a high-quality HRM study including data acquisition and interpretation, based on CCv4.0, using Manoview ESO analysis software, version 3.3 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).

The Role of High-Resolution Manometry Prior to and Following Antireflux Surgery: The Padova Consensus.

In the last two decades the development of high-resolution manometry (HRM) has changed and revolutionized the diagnostic assessment of patients complain foregut symptoms. The role of HRM before and after antireflux procedure remains unclear, especially in surgical practice, where a clear understanding of esophageal physiology and hiatus anatomy is essential for optimal outcome of antireflux surgery (ARS). Surgeons and gastroenterologists (GIs) agree that assessing patients following antireflux procedures can be challenging. Although endoscopy and barium-swallow can reveal anatomic abnormalities, physiologic information on HRM allowing insight into the cause of eventually recurrent symptoms could be key to clinical decision making. A multi-disciplinary international working group (14 surgeons and 15 GIs) collaborated to develop consensus on the role of HRM pre- and post- ARS, and to develop a postoperative classification to interpret HRM findings. The method utilized was detailed literature review to develop statements, and the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methodology (RAM) to assess agreement with the statements. Only statements with an approval rate >80% or a final ranking with a median score of 7 were accepted in the consensus. The working groups evaluated the role of HRM prior to ARS and the role of HRM following ARS. This international initiative developed by surgeons and GIs together, summarizes the state of our knowledge of the use of HRM pre- and post-ARS. The Padova Classification was developed to facilitate the interpretation of HRM studies of patients underwent ARS.

A214 AGE, SEX AND POSITION INFLUENCE UPPER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURES

Abstract Background Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function may be evaluated using high resolution manometry (HRM) to measure manometric parameters specific to the UES. The UES parameters are not well established however there is evidence suggesting a relationship between the UES parameters and esophageal motility disorders as well as UES parameters and symptoms including dysphagia, globus sensation and reflux. The Esophageal Symptom Questionnaire (ESQ-30) is a validated tool in the assessment of esophageal symptoms and measures the frequency and severity of dysphagia, reflux and globus through three separate sub-scales (ESQ-D, ESQ-R, ESQ-G respectively). Aims We aimed to identify the relationship between UES manometric variables and patient demographic variables (age, sex) as well as patient symptoms including broad categories of globus sensation, dysphagia and reflux. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive reports from HRM studies performed between October 2021 – March 2023 who provided consent for inclusion in the motility databank and completed ESQ-30 questionnaires. All values expressed as median (IQR: 25-75-centile). Values were compared with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Relationships between manometric diagnosis, UES pressures and symptomatology were explored. Results 681 patients underwent esophageal manometry and completed the ESQ-30 questionnaire. These patients were 442 (65%) female (mean age 54.6 +/- 14.8 years). Over the study period, 318 patients underwent esophageal HRM in the upright position and were diagnosed according to CCv3 and 361 patients underwent HRM in the supine position and were diagnosed by CCv4 manometric criteria. UES mean basal pressure was significantly higher in females than males (64.6 [42.3-89.1] vs 68.4 [48.4-96.1], p = .015) as well as in the supine position (77.5 [55.9-101.0] vs. 56.0 [38.7-80.3]. UES mean basal pressure was negatively correlated with age (R2 -.28 p ampersand:003C .001). In terms of esophageal symptomatology, dysphagia scores (ESQ-D) were negatively correlated with UES mean basal pressure (R2 -.15, p ampersand:003C .001). Conclusions Age, sex and position may influence UES manometric pressures. The finding of higher UES pressures in the supine position may reflect a mechanism for decreasing proximal reflux. The decreased UES basal pressure with age is possibly related to changes in the integrity of the neuromuscular system. Having a better understanding of the poorly understood normal UES dynamics and how this changes in motility disorders may allow us to more specifically target areas for treatment. Funding Agencies None

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that pertains to a computer's ability to mimic and sometimes surpass human intelligence in interpretation of large datasets. The adoption of AI in gastrointestinal motility has been slower compared to other areas such as polyp detection and interpretation of histopathology. Within esophageal physiologic testing, AI can automate interpretation of image-based tests, especially high resolution manometry (HRM) and functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) studies. Basic tasks such as identification of landmarks, determining adequacy of the HRM study and identification from achalasia from non-achalasia patterns are achieved with good accuracy. However, existing AI systems compare AI interpretation to expert analysis rather than to clinical outcome from management based on AI diagnosis. The use of AI methods is much less advanced within the field of ambulatory reflux monitoring, where challenges exist in assimilation of data from multiple impedance and pH channels. There remains potential for replication of the AI successes within esophageal physiologic testing to HRM of the anorectum, and to innovative and novel methods of evaluating gastric electrical activity and motor function. The use of AI has tremendous potential to improve detection of dysmotility within the esophagus using esophageal physiologic testing, as well as in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Eventually, integration of patient presentation, demographics and alternate test results to individual motility test interpretation will improve diagnostic precision and prognostication using AI tools.

Brief guidelines for beginners on how to perform and analyze esophageal high-resolution manometry

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a diagnostic tool for surgeons, gastroenterologists and other healthcare professionals to evaluate esophageal physiology. The Chicago Classification (CC) system is based on a consensus of worldwide experts to minimize ambiguity in HRM data acquisition and diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The most updated version, CCv4.0, was published in 2021; however, it does not provide step-by-step guidelines (i.e., for beginners) on how to assess the most important HRM metrics. This paper aims to summarize the basic guidelines for conducting a high-quality HRM study including data acquisition and interpretation, based on CCv4.0, using Manoview ESO analysis software, version 3.3 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction in Children with Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft after Failed Primary Cleft Repair.

Changes in pharyngeal and upper-esophageal-sphincter (UES) motor dynamics contribute to swallowing dysfunction. Children with type 1 laryngeal clefts can present with swallowing dysfunction and associated symptoms which may persist even after the initial endoscopic intervention. This study sought to characterize pharyngeal and esophageal motor function in children with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had persistent presenting symptoms after their initial therapeutic intervention. We retrospectively analyzed high-resolution esophageal manometry studies of children ≤ 18 years old with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had an esophageal manometry study performed for persistent symptoms after an initial repair. A total of 16 children were found to have significantly increased UES resting pressure, UES pre- and post-swallow maximum pressures, and duration of UES contraction during swallows in comparison to nine age-matched controls of children without pharyngeal anatomical abnormalities. There was no difference between UES residual pressures or pharyngeal dynamics between the two groups. UES resting and residual pressures did not correlate with VFFS in penetration and aspiration scores of children with type 1 laryngeal clefts status post repair. Our study is the first to identify specific changes in UES motor function in patients with type 1 laryngeal cleft post initial repair.

Assessing the diagnostic yield of achalasia using provocative testing in high-resolution esophageal manometry: Serial diagnostic study.

Chicago Classification v4.0 recommends that if achalasia is demonstrated with single water swallows (SWS); provocative testing is not required. We determine whether provocative testing in patients with suspected achalasia can change manometric findings and reproduce symptoms. Between 2016 and 2022, 127 consecutive manometry studies of patients with achalasia were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent SWS, a solid meal (SM) and/or a rapid drink challenge (RDC). Demographic data, fluoroscopy, gastroscopy, and pre-and post-treatment Eckardt scores were collated. Of 127 achalasia patients (50.6 ± 16.6 years and 54.6% male), all completed a SM and 116 (91.3%) completed RDC; overall 83 were naïve (65.4%) to previous therapy. 15.4% patients with normal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on SWS demonstrated obstruction with RDC. SM gave a different achalasia phenotype in 44.9% of patients (p ⟨ 0.001). Twelve patients with normal IRP during SWS had persistent/recurrent obstruction during provocative testing; 83.3% had previous achalasia therapy. None of 13 patients with Type III (TIII) achalasia with SWS exhibited a change in manometric findings with provocative testing. Impedance bolus heights were lower in patients with TIII achalasia and those with normal IRP with SWS. During the SM, symptoms were reproduced in 56.7% of patients. Forty-six of 103 patients (44.7%) underwent therapy based upon the final achalasia subtype which was defined by the provocative test result of the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study. All treatments were effective, regardless of the achalasia subtype. Manometric findings remain unchanged when TIII achalasia is diagnosed with SWS. In patients with normal IRP, Type I, or Type II achalasia during SWS, provocative testing can alter achalasia phenotype or uncover achalasia where diagnosis is unclear. Further, it can reproduce symptoms. Such findings can personalize and guide effective therapeutic decisions.

Relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in response to reduced volume distension during FLIP Panometry.

The esophageal response to stepwise distension during the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry study often parallels high-resolution manometry (HRM) motility diagnoses. This study aimed to describe the changes in FLIP metrics during FLIP emptying, that is, reduced volume distension. Adult patients who completed FLIP and HRM for esophageal motility evaluation were included. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening parameters were assessed during stepwise FLIP filling to volumes of 60 mL ("filling 60 mL"), then 70 mL, and then back to 60 mL ("emptying 60 mL"). HRM studies were analyzed per Chicago classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Among 265 patients included, HRM/CCv4.0 diagnoses included achalasia in 80 patients (30%), normal motility in 70 (26%), and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in 43 (16%). EGJ-distensibility index (DI) and EGJ diameter were greater during emptying 60 mL than filling 60 mL in achalasia, normal motility, and IEM (p values <0.002). If applying the emptying 60 mL EGJ-DI (vs. filling 60 mL EGJ-DI), EGJ opening classification changed from reduced EGJ opening to borderline EGJ opening in 31% of achalasia patients and in 2% of patients with normal motility or IEM. EGJ opening classification was unchanged in 69% achalasia and 96% of normal motility/IEM. This study suggests that isotonic or auxotonic relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter occurs with reduced volume distension in patients with achalasia and normal motility. The study also supports the importance of utilizing a standardized FLIP motility study protocol (i.e., controlled, stepwise filling to 50 mL, 60 mL, then 70 mL) to provide reliable and generalizable FLIP metrics to facilitate diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Technical Success in Performing Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Patients with an Epiphrenic Diverticulum.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, yet it can be poorly tolerated and technically challenging. Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) are located in the distal esophagus and are associated with underlying motility disorders. ED patients (2008-2022) were retrospectively compared to achalasia patients (2008-2022) and all other patients (2021-2022) who underwent HRM at a single center. Complete success was defined as at least 7 interpretable swallows including measurements throughout the esophagus into the stomach. HRM studies involving children, previously treated achalasia, and sedation or endoscopic-assistance were excluded. 20 ED patients (mean age 66; 60% female) were compared to 76 achalasia patients and 199 controls. HRM was completely successful in 70.0% of ED patients, 85.5% of achalasia (p = 0.106 vs ED), and 91.0% of controls (p = 0.004 vs ED). Most failures in the ED and achalasia groups were due to inability to traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), while patient intolerance was the main reason in controls. Half of the ED group had motility disorders (25% achalasia, 15% hypercontractile esophagus, 10% absent contractility). Large diverticulum size was inversely associated with technical success compared to small diverticulum size (40% vs 100%, p = 0.013), while the presence of a motility disorder did not significantly affect success (60% vs 88.9%, p = 0.303). In conclusion,ED is a predictor of unsuccessful HRM. This appears to be mainly related to an inability to traverse the EGJ due to the size of the diverticulum. Consideration should be given to alternative means of evaluating motility, such as endoscopy-assisted HRM, given the high likelihood of failure with traditional HRM.

Esophageal Inlet Patch: Association with Barrett's Esophagus.

Esophageal inlet patch (IP) with heterotopic gastric mucosa is an incidental finding on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Although IP is thought to be embryologic in nature, IP has been associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to compare prevalence, symptoms, demographic factors, and esophageal testing in patients with IP and BE. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic findings of EGDs, high-resolution esophageal manometry and esophageal pH impedance studies from January 2010 to January 2021 at a single academic medical center. Patients were grouped by presence or absence of IP and BE. Of 27,498 patients evaluated, 1.3% had endoscopic evidence of IP and 4.9% had BE. Of 362 patients with IP, 17.1% had BE; of 1356 patients with BE, 4.6% had IP. Both IP and BE patients presented primarily with heartburn and/or regurgitation. Patients with BE and/or IP were older and had higher BMI than those without (p < 0.001). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower and mean acid exposure time (AET) was higher in patients with IP and/or BE than those without (p < 0.05). Our study reports an IP prevalence of 1.3%, with 17.1% patients having concomitant BE; and a BE prevalence of 4.9%, with 4.6% also having IP. Patients with IP alone presented with similar symptoms to patients with concomitant BE. Esophageal function testing showed that patients with either IP or BE had decreased LES pressures and increased esophageal AET. During endoscopy, patients found to have one of these findings should be carefully examined for the other.

The integrated relaxation pressure may not be an appropriate gold standard for deglutitive relaxation due to reliance on a single intragastric reference sensor.

Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) calculation depends on the selection of a single gastric reference sensor. Variable gastric pressure readings due to sensor selection can lead to diagnostic uncertainty. This study aimed to examine the effect of gastric reference sensor selection on IRP measurement and diagnosis. We identified high-resolution manometry (HRM) conducted between January and November 2017 with at least six intragastric reference sensors. IRP measurements and Chicago Classification 3.0 (CCv3) diagnoses were obtained for each of six gastric reference sensors. Studies were categorized as "stable" (no change in diagnosis) or "variable" (change in diagnosis with gastric reference selection). Variable diagnoses were further divided into "variable normal/dysmotility" (≥1 normal IRP measurement and ≥1 CCv3 diagnosis), or "variable dysmotility" (≥1 CCv3 diagnosis, only elevated IRP measurements). Bland-Altman plots were used to compare IRP measurements within HRM studies. The analysis included 100 HRM studies, among which 18% had variable normal/dysmotility, and 10% had variable dysmotility. The average IRP difference between reference sensors was 6.7 mmHg for variable normal/dysmotility and 5.9 mmHg for variable dysmotility. The average difference between the proximal-most and distal-most sensors was -1.52 mmHg (lower limit of agreement -10.03 mmHg, upper limit of agreement 7.00 mmHg). IRP values can vary greatly depending on the reference sensor used, leading to inconsistent diagnoses in 28% of HRM studies. Choosing the correct gastric reference sensor is crucial for accurate test results and avoiding misdiagnosis. Standardization of reference sensor selection or supportive testing for uncertain results should be considered.

Esophageal Motility Patterns in Paraesophageal Hernia Patients Compared to Sliding Hiatal Hernia: Bigger Is Not Better

BackgroundIn patients with paraesophageal hernias (PEH), the course of the esophagus is often altered, which may affect esophageal motility. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is frequently used to evaluate esophageal motor function prior to PEH repair. This study was performed to characterize esophageal motility disorders in patients with PEH as compared to sliding hiatal hernia and to determine how these findings affect operative decision-making. MethodsPatients referred for HRM to a single institution from 2015 to 2019 were included in a prospectively maintained database. HRM studies were analyzed for the appearance of any esophageal motility disorder using the Chicago classification. PEH patients had confirmation of their diagnosis at the time of surgery, and the type of fundoplication performed was recorded. They were case-matched based on sex, age, and BMI to patients with sliding hiatal hernia who were referred for HRM in the same period. ResultsThere were 306 patients diagnosed with a PEH who underwent repair. When compared to case-matched sliding hiatal hernia patients, PEH patients had higher rates of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (p<.001) and lower rates of absent peristalsis (p=.048). Of those with ineffective motility (n=70), 41 (59%) had a partial or no fundoplication performed during PEH repair. ConclusionPEH patients had higher rates of IEM compared to controls, possibly due to a chronically distorted esophageal lumen. Offering the appropriate operation hinges on understanding the involved anatomy and esophageal function of each individual. HRM is important to obtain preoperatively for optimizing patient and procedure selection in PEH repair.

Proximal Gastric Pressurization After Sleeve Gastrectomy Associates With Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) results in persistent or de novo reflux more often than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We investigated pressurization patterns in the proximal stomach on high-resolution manometry (HRM) to determine associations with reflux after SG. Patients undergoing HRM and ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring after SG and RYGB over a 2-year period (2019-2020) were included. For each included patient, 2 symptomatic control patients with HRM and pH-impedance monitoring for reflux symptoms were identified within the same time frame; 15 asymptomatic healthy controls with HRM studies were also studied. Concurrent myotomy and preoperative diagnosis of obstructive motor disorders were exclusions. Conventional HRM metrics, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressures, contractile integral (EGJ-CI), acid exposure time (AET), and reflux episode numbers were extracted. Intragastric pressure was sampled at baseline, during swallows, and with straight leg raise maneuver, and compared with intraesophageal pressure and reflux burden. Patient cohorts included 36 SG patients, 23 RYGB patients, 113 symptomatic controls, and 15 asymptomatic controls. While both SG and RYGB patients pressurized the stomach during swallows and straight leg raise, SG patients had higher AET (median 6.0% vs 0.2%), reflux episode numbers (median 63.0 vs 37.5), and baseline intragastric pressure (median 17.3 mm Hg vs 13.1 mm Hg) ( P < 0.001). SG patients also had lower trans-EGJ pressure gradients when reflux episodes were >80 or AET was >6.0% ( P = 0.018 and 0.08, respectively, compared with no pathologic reflux). On multivariable analysis, SG status and low EGJ-CI independently associated with AET and reflux episode numbers ( P ≤ 0.04). Impaired EGJ barrier function and proximal gastric pressurization after SG are associated with gastroesophageal reflux, especially during strain maneuvers.

Effect of aging and obesity on esophageal mucosal integrity as measured by baseline impedance.

Low mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) values support gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis. Recent data denote that age and obesity may affect MNBI. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic MNBI cutoffs as also the effect of aging and body mass index (BMI) on MNBI. In total 311 patients (M/F: 139/172, mean age: 47 ± 13) referred for typical GERD symptoms that have undertaken both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and pH-Impedance studies off PPI were evaluated. MNBI at 3, 5, and 17 cm over lower esophageal sphincter (LES) were evaluated. GERD was diagnosed if acid exposure time (AET) >6%. Mean BMI was 26.6 ± 5.9 kg/cm2 . GERD was diagnosed in 39.2% and 13.5% had inconclusive GERD. MNBI was correlated to patients' age, BMI, AET, and the length of LES-CD separation and at 3 cm also to the total number of reflux and LES hypotension. In the multivariate analysis MNBI at 3 and 5 cm was independently correlated only to age, BMI, and AET. Patients with definite GERD showed lower MNBI at 3 cm compared with inconclusive GERD though both showed lower values when compared with GERD absence. At 3 cm MNBI ability for diagnosing GERD was good (0.815, p < 0.001 95% CI: 0.766-0.863) with an optimal cutoff point of 1281 Ohm. According to our study findings age and BMI affect independently lower esophageal MNBI values in patients evaluated for GERD. MNBI significantly aids toward GERD diagnosis though in a real-life setting MNBI values much lower than the one previously proposed should be used.

Intermittent Hiatus Hernia on High-Resolution Manometry Associates With Abnormal Reflux Burden Similar to Persistent Hiatus Hernia.

Hiatus hernia is characterized by axial separation between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm, and higher reflux burden. Impact on reflux is unclear if such separation is intermittent rather than persistent. Reflux burden off antisecretory therapy was compared between no hernia (n = 357), intermittent hernia (n = 42), and persistent hernia (n = 155) after review of consecutive high-resolution manometry and reflux monitoring studies. Proportions with pathologic acid exposure was similar between intermittent and persistent hernia (45.2% vs 46.5%, respectively), and both were significantly different from no hernia (28.7%, P ≤ 0.002). Intermittent hiatus hernias are clinically relevant in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology.

Preoperative esophageal testing predicts postoperative reflux status in sleeve gastrectomy patients.

Patients who undergo vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are at risk of postoperative GERD. The reasons are multifactorial, but half of conversions to Roux-en Y gastric bypass are for intractable GERD. Our institution routinely performs preoperative pH and high-resolution manometry studies to aid in operative decision making. We hypothesize that abnormal pH studies in concert with ineffective esophageal motility would lead to higher rates of postoperative reflux after VSG. A single institution retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who underwent preoperative pH and manometry testing and VSG between 2015 and 2021. Patients filled out a symptom questionnaire at the time of testing. Postoperative reflux was defined by patient-reported symptoms at 1-year follow-up. Univariate logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between esophageal tests and postoperative reflux. The Lui method was used to determine the cutpoint for pH and manometric variables maximizing sensitivity and specificity for postoperative reflux. Of 291 patients who underwent VSG, 66 (22.7%) had a named motility disorder and 67 (23%) had an abnormal DeMeester score. Preoperatively, reflux was reported by 122 patients (41.9%), of those, 69 (56.6%) had resolution. Preoperative pH and manometric abnormalities, and BMI reduction did not predict postoperative reflux status (p = ns). In a subgroup analysis of patients with an abnormal preoperative pH study, the Lui cutpoint to predict postoperative reflux was a DeMeester greater than 24.8. Postoperative reflux symptoms rates above and below this point were 41.9% versus 17.1%, respectively (p = 0.03). While manometry abnormalities did not predict postoperative reflux symptoms, GERD burden did. Patients with a mildly elevated DeMeester score had a low risk of postoperative reflux compared to patients with a more abnormal DeMeester score. A preoperative pH study may help guide operative decision-making and lead to better counseling of patients of their risk for reflux after VSG.

Interrater Reliability of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry and High-Resolution Manometry for the Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations. Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss' κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard. Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%). Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.