High-resolution Esophageal Manometry Research Articles

Do children with dysphagia and normal esophageal motility according to Chicago Classification always have "normal" esophageal motility?

Internationally adopted Chicago Classification (CC) criteria based on adult normative data have been used to diagnose children with esophageal motility disorders undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). The aim of this study was to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia and children with dysphagia and normal findings according to CC. HREM metrics of 41 children (13.2 (9-18) years; 20 female) without dysphagia and 41 children (13.7 (8-18) years; 30 female) with dysphagia and normal diagnosis according to CC were compared. Analyzed data included resting and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) of upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincters, esophageal peristaltic contractile integrals, transition zone (TZ) gaps, distal latency (DL), and manometric esophageal length to height ratio (MELH). 95%ile normative cutoffs were calculated from the cohort without dysphagia. Proximal contractile integral (PCI), UES and LES mean resting and IRP were not significantly different between the cohorts (p > 0.3). On the contrary, distal contractile integral (DCI), TZ gap and MELH were notably different with p = 0.0002, p = 0.027, and p = 0.033 respectively. According to 95%ile normative cutoffs of DCI, TZ gap and MELH, in cohort with dysphagia 27%, 15%, and 22% of patients respectively were not normal. First study ever to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia to children with dysphagia. Considerable proportion of children with dysphagia may be underdiagnosed according to the adult criteria. This emphasizes the need for universally accepted child-specific diagnostic protocols and norms.

A Predictive Nomogram for the Occurrence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Study Based on Preoperative HERM.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common complication after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); This study aimed to construct a model that can predict the incidence of GERD after LSG by exploring the correlation between the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and the incidence of GERD after LSG. We collected the clinical data of patients who had undergone HREM before bariatric surgery from September 2013 to September 2019 at the bariatric center of our hospital. The Gerd-Q scores during the postoperative follow-up were collected to determine the incidence of GERD. A logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the correlation of the HREM results and general clinical data with the incidence of GERD after LSG. The percentage of synchronous contractions, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, and history of smoking were correlated with the development of GERD after LSG, with the history of smoking and percentage of synchronous contractions as risk factors and LES resting pressure as a protective factor. The training set showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the nomogram model of 0.847. The validation set showed an AUC of 0.761. The decision and clinical impact curves showed a high clinical value for the prediction model. The HREM results correlated with the development of GERD after LSG, with the percentage of synchronous contractions and LES resting pressure showing predictive value. Combined with the history of smoking, the predictive model showed a high confidence and clinical value.

Comparison of daytime and nighttime supine gastroesophageal reflux by pH monitoring of individuals with clinical suspicion of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

This study aims to compare pHmetric characteristics of diurnal and nocturnal supine reflux. We studied 500 consecutive individuals with clinical suspicion of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry and prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring. Patients were classified with supine GERD pattern when the percentage of acid reflux time in the supine position was equal to or greater than 2.2%. Data on acid reflux in the supine position during daytime and nighttime recumbency were: (i) acid exposure time, (ii) number of reflux episodes, (iii) longest reflux episode, (iv) interval between the last meal and the supine position, (v) interval between the supine position and the first acid reflux episode, and (vi) reported symptoms. Of the 500 evaluated patients, 238 (48%) had GERD. Among these, supine pattern was observed in 134 (56%) patients, bipositional in 53 (23%), and orthostatic in 51 (21%). In patients with daytime recumbency, 112 (51% of 217) were pathological refluxers, with a mean DeMeester score of 45 ± 26. Total acid exposure time (P = 0.8) and reported Symptom Index (P = 0.2) did not differ depending on the period, whether diurnal or nocturnal. All other pHmetric parameters were lower during daytime recumbency. In conclusion, diurnal supine reflux has similar acid exposure time and temporal correlation between symptoms and reflux episodes as nocturnal supine reflux. Other pHmetric parameters are lower for diurnal supine reflux.

Distal contractile integral and other key predictors of mean nocturnal baseline impedance: The role of esophageal peristaltic vigor in mucosal permeability.

Understanding the relationship between distal contractile integral (DCI) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) could shed light on new diagnostic and treatment strategies, specifically concerning nocturnal reflux. This study aimed to assess this relationship to enhance our comprehension of the interplay between esophageal contractility and mucosal permeability. We identified adult patients who had high resolution esophageal manometry and pH-impedance tests performed within a 30-day period between December 2018 and March 2022. A random forest model was used to identify significant predictors of MNBI, assisting with variable selection for a following regression analysis. Subsequently, both univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to measure the association between predictors and MNBI. Our study included 188 patients, primarily referred for testing due to reflux. The most common motility diagnoses were normal (62%) followed by possible esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (22%). The mean DCI was 2020 mmHg∙s∙cm and MNBI was 3.05 kΩ. The random forest model identified 12 significant predictors for MNBI, key variables being acid exposure time (AET), total proximal reflux events, intraabdominal lower esophageal sphincter length, hiatal hernia presence, and DCI. Subsequent multivariable regression analyses demonstrated log AET (β = -0.69, p = <0.001), total proximal reflux events (β = -0.16, p = 0.008), hiatal hernia presence (β = -0.82, p = 0.014), log DCI (β = 1.26, p < 0.001), and age (β = -0.13, p = 0.036) as being significantly associated with MNBI. DCI is a key manometric predictor of MNBI emphasizing the role of manometry in detecting reflux risk and the need for its consideration in reflux management.

Sedation and Endoscopy-Assisted High-Resolution Manometry (SEA-HRM) in Patients Who Previously Failed Standard Esophageal Manometry

Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess patient perspectives towards it. Methods: Adult patients who previously failed HRM were prospectively enrolled. Under propofol sedation, an upper endoscopy was performed during which the HRM catheter was advanced under endoscopic visualization. If the catheter did not reach the stomach on its own, the endoscope itself or a snare was used to help it traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Results: Thirty patients participated (mean age 67.8, 70% female). The technical success of SEA-HRM was 100%. Twenty-two (73.3%) were diagnosed with a motility disorder including thirteen (43.3%) with achalasia. Eighteen (60%) had previously failed HRM due to discomfort/intolerance, while twelve (40%) failed due to catheter coiling in the esophagus. Subjects in the coiling group were more likely to need endoscopic assistance to traverse the EGJ (91.7% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001) and have a motility disorder (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.010), including achalasia (75.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), compared to the discomfort/intolerance group. All patients preferred SEA-HRM and rated it higher than standard HRM (9.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1, p = &lt;0.001, on a scale of 1–10). Conclusions: SEA-HRM is a highly successful and well-tolerated option in patients who previously failed standard HRM. This should be the recommended approach in cases of failed HRM rather than secondary tests of esophageal motility.

Prospective Evaluation of Abelchia/RCPD Patients: Abnormalities in High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate patients with abelchia using standardized investigations to explore possible underlying mechanisms. Patients presenting with clinical scenario consistent with RCPD were recruited into the study after informed consent. All patients underwent standardized investigations: Self reporting questionnaires EAT-10, VHI-10, and RSI scores, as well as esophagogastroscopy, barium swallow, and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), were performed. RCPD patients demonstrated a minor increase in the mean EAT-10 (5.2 ± 1.2) and normal RSI/VHI-10 scores. Barium swallow revealed 53% (CI 38%-64%) were abnormal with reflux with hiatus hernia (37%) and dysmotility (16%) as most common findings. HRM showed that 67% (CI 54%-78%) were abnormal. Ineffective motility was found in 41%, a further 23% showed a complete absence of peristalsis, whereas 33% were normal. RCPD is a clinical condition of lifelong inability to belch and associated symptoms. The underlying pathophysiology is poorly understood. This study demonstrates that a significant number of RCPD patients have abnormal esophageal neural network with high proportion of abnormal or absent esophageal peristalsis. 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

S606 Correlation of Esophageal Motility Abnormality on Video Fluoroscopic Study With Findings on High Resolution Esophageal Manometry

S606 Correlation of Esophageal Motility Abnormality on Video Fluoroscopic Study With Findings on High Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Assessing Aberrant Subclavian Artery on High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry

Assessing Aberrant Subclavian Artery on High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry

S596 Antinuclear Antibodies in Patients Undergoing High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry with Impedance

S596 Antinuclear Antibodies in Patients Undergoing High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry with Impedance

Normative high resolution esophageal manometry values in asymptomatic patients with obesity.

Surgical bariatric interventions, while highly effective, can be associated with post-operative esophageal symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility. Whether pre-operative physiology impacts this risk is unknown, in part because expected values on esophageal manometry in patients with obesity are not well understood. This study seeks to establish normative values on esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) and the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in the asymptomatic patient with obesity. This retrospective study included adult patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg m-2 without esophageal symptoms undergoing preoperative bariatric surgical evaluation, including HRM, at a single tertiary care center between February, 2019 and February, 2020. Of 104 asymptomatic patients with obesity, HRM identified normal esophageal motility in 94 (90.4%) with the remaining 10 having ineffective esophageal motility (3.8%), manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (3.8%), distal esophageal spasm (1.0%), and hypercontractile esophagus (1.0%). Mean of median lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (LES IRP) was 10.6 mmHg supine (95th percentile 21.5 mmHg) and 8.5 mmHg upright (95th percentile 21.3 mmHg). 86% of patients had intragastric pressure above 8 mmHg. Mean of mean distal contractile integral (DCI) was 2261.6 mmHg cm s-1 (95th percentile 5889.5 mmHg cm s-1). The vast majority of asymptomatic patients with obesity had normal manometry. LES IRP and DCI were higher than that observed in non-obese cohorts. Additionally, BMI correlated to increased intragastric pressure. These data suggest that normative values in patients with obesity should be adjusted to prevent overdiagnosis of EGJOO or hypercontractile esophagus.

Personalized diagnosis of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry

To determine the phenotypic variants of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), hypersensitive esophagus (HSE), functional heartburn (FH) using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HSEM). Fifty-five treatment-native symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed GERD and 48 control group subjects (CG) were examined. The mean age of the subjects was 45.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.0-48.9). Patients were grouped based on typical symptoms (heartburn, belching, regurgitation, odynophagy, dysphagia), medical history, endoscopy results, and 24-hour pH-impedance testing. Patients with typical symptoms of GERD and Grade B, C, D erosive esophagitis (EE) according to the Los Angeles Classification (LA) based on endoscopy were excluded from the further study. All patients without changes in the esophageal mucosa on endoscopy or with LA grade A EE (presumably NERD) underwent 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM without proton pump inhibitors. Acid exposure, acid reflux count, symptom association with reflux (with symptom index and symptom association with reflux), mean nocturnal impedance, and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index were assessed. The structure (presence or absence of a hiatal hernia) and function (presence or absence of the lower esophageal sphincter hypotonia) of the esophagogastric junction, as well as the motor function of the thoracic esophagus, were assessed using HSEM. The results of the HSEM were interpreted according to the Chicago Classification, 3rd edition (2015). The number of acid refluxes in patients with NERD was 71.0 (95% CI 58.4-83.7), in subjects with HSE - 38.5 (95% CI 28.3-49.0), with FH - 13.0 (95% CI 6.5-18.2), in CG - 16.5 (95% CI 9.0-21.0). The average nocturnal basal impedance was 1300 ohms (95% CI 1000-1986) in patients with NERD, 1725 ohms (95% CI 1338-2261) in patients with HSE, 2760 ohms (95% CI 2453-3499) in FH, 2515 ohms (95% CI 2283-2700) in CG. The index of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave in patients with NERD was 61% (95% CI 57-71), with HSE - 85% (95% CI 82-88), with FH - 71% (95% CI 64-78), in CG - 66% (95% CI 63-69). Hiatal hernia and/or hypotonia of the LES were more common in patients with NERD (23%) than in CG (13.3%). Ineffective motility was detected in 34% of patients with NERD, in 23% of subject with FH and in 66.7% of patients with HSE. The results support the hypothesis that patients with GERD symptoms represent a heterogeneous population. 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM helps to differentiate endoscopically negative patients with GERD symptoms and patients with Grade A EE by LA to NERD, HSE and FH.

Gemini-Assisted Deep Learning Classification Model for Automated Diagnosis of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry Images.

Background/Objectives: To develop a deep learning model for esophageal motility disorder diagnosis using high-resolution manometry images with the aid of Gemini. Methods: Gemini assisted in developing this model by aiding in code writing, preprocessing, model optimization, and troubleshooting. Results: The model demonstrated an overall precision of 0.89 on the testing set, with an accuracy of 0.88, a recall of 0.88, and an F1-score of 0.885. It presented better results for multiple categories, particularly in the panesophageal pressurization category, with precision = 0.99 and recall = 0.99, yielding a balanced F1-score of 0.99. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence, particularly Gemini, in aiding the creation of robust deep learning models for medical image analysis, solving not just simple binary classification problems but more complex, multi-class image classification tasks.

373. FLIPPING THE SCRIPT: ENDOFLIPPING THROUGH ESOPHAGEAL CHALLENGES WITH A TWIST!

Abstract Background High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for studying esophageal motility disorders but isn't universally available, and it's also reported as invasive and uncomfortable. The EndoFLIP system offers a dynamic evaluation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), crucial for patients with inconclusive HRM or undergoing endoscopic or surgical therapy such as myotomy or fundoplication. EndoFLIP is a practical tool in patients with dysphagia with normal upper endoscopy, allowing diagnostic assessment during the same procedure, and better selecting patients for subsequent HRM. Methods We conducted a retrospective study where we analyzed EndoFLIP procedures performed at a tertiary center from January 2022 to February 2024, for multiple indications, including characterization of findings on HRM, primary investigation of patients with dysphagia undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy, motility study in patients intolerant to HRM, and post-therapeutic endoscopic/surgical assessment. Results Sixty-nine patients submitted to EndoFLIP procedures were included (39.1% male; 60.9% female) with a median age of 62 years. The primary indication was dysphagia, with 17.3% of patients being intolerant or referred with inconclusive HRM. EndoFLIP enabled diagnosis in all patients, even with an inconclusive HRM. Endoflip was performed on patients with treated achalasia with recurrence of dysphagia (16%), of which 55% exhibited reduced distensibility of EGJ. The evidence of reduced distensibility allowed patient selection for further treatment. Seven patients underwent EndoFLIP to characterize EGJOO. Comparing paired data from HRM and EndoFLIP, overall concordance was only 47,1%. Endoflip showed a large discordance for the EGJOO group, with 50% having normal findings and 20% confirming EGJOO. 43,8% of patients diagnosed with EGJOO confirmed by EndoFLIP underwent endoscopic therapy during the same procedure, allowing the diagnosis and treatment at the same time. Four patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, intolerant to HRM and proposed for Nissen fundoplication, underwent EndoFLIP for EGJ and esophageal motility evaluation. Currently, they are proposed for surgery due to the normal findings on EndoFLIP. Conclusion The use of EndoFLIP in evaluating esophageal motility disorders presents a paradigm shift, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods like HRM. Our retrospective study demonstrates its pivotal role in diagnosing and managing patients with dysphagia submitted to diagnostic endoscopy, especially post-interventions like achalasia or Nissen fundoplication. With its ability to provide comprehensive assessments and guide tailored treatments, EndoFLIP emerges as a valuable tool in clinical practice. Its impact on patient management, evidenced by alterations in treatment strategies in over 80% of cases, underscores its significance.

383. LOSS OF PERISTALTIC RESERVE DETERMINED BY MULTIPLE RAPID SWALLOWS CORRELATES WITH DYSPHAGIA AND POOR BOLUS TRANSIT IN INEFFECTIVE ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

Abstract Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a common finding on high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and is often of unclear clinical significance as its impact on dysphagia and bolus transit is variable. Multiple rapid swallow (MRS) testing is a provocative maneuver performed during HRM that assesses peristaltic reserve, documented by the presence of contractile augmentation (defined by contractile vigor after MRS greater than that seen with single swallows). Lack of augmentation after MRS is associated with dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery. To date, no studies have evaluated the impact of peristaltic reserve on dysphagia and bolus transit in IEM patients. Methods Retrospective review of 159 patients with Chicago classification 4.0 IEM. 52 patients were excluded due to prior esophageal surgery, technically inadequate MRS, or concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Demographics and brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire (BEDQ) results were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. MRS and bolus transit data were analyzed using a commercially available software. Impedance analysis documented complete versus incomplete bolus transit. Augmentation was defined as the ratio of post-MRS DCI to mean single swallow DCI &amp;gt; 1. Fisher's exact test for continuous data and linear model ANOVA were used to assess for statistical significance. Results 107 IEM patients were included, 46 of them had loss of peristaltic reserve (no augmentation on MRS). Compared to IEM patients with augmentation, those without augmentation had more severe dysphagia documented by higher mean BEDQ score (6.8 versus 4.8, p= 0.045), and increased rates of impaired bolus transit (73% versus 55%, p-= 0.013). Discussion IEM patients without augmentation on MRS have more severe dysphagia and more frequent incomplete bolus clearance. These findings support adding MRS response to the diagnosis of IEM or using it to describe a subset of patients with more severe disease.

Value of endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

To investigate the significance of endoscopic grading (Hill's classification) of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) in the examination of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing gastroscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology, Xingyi People's Hospital between Apr. 2022 and Sept. 2022 were selected by convenient sampling, and data such as GEFV grade, and findings of esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal 24-h pH/impedance reflux monitoring, and Los Angeles (LA) classification of reflux esophagitis (RE) were collected and compared. Statistically significant differences in age (F = 9.711, P < 0.001) and hiatal hernia (χ = 35.729, P < 0.001) were observed in patients with different GEFV grades. The resting LES pressures were 12.12 ± 2.79, 10.73 ± 2.68, 9.70 ± 2.29, and 8.20 ± 2.77mmHg (F = 4.571, P < 0.001) and LES lengths were 3.30 ± 0.70, 3.16 ± 0.68, 2.35 ± 0.83, and 2.45 ± 0.62 (F = 3.789, P = 0.011), respectively, in patients with GEFV grades I-IV. DeMeester score (Z = 5.452, P < 0.001), AET4 (Z = 5.614, P < 0.001), acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 7.452, P < 0.001), weak acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.121, P = 0.038), liquid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.321, P = 0.031), acid reflux score (supine) (Z = 6.462, P < 0.001), mixed reflux score (supine) (Z= 3.324, P = 0.031), gas reflux score (supine) (Z= 3.521, P = 0.024) were different in patients with different GEFV grades, with statistically significant differences. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between RE grade and LA classification of GERD (r = 0.662, P < 0.001), and the severity of RE increased gradually with the increase of the Hill grades of GEFV. The Hill grade of GEFV is related to age, hiatal hernia, LES pressure, and the consequent development and severity of acid reflux and RE. Evaluation of esophageal motility and reflux based on the Hill grade of GEFV is of significance for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.

Diagnostic Utility of High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Its Correlation with Symptoms.

Primary esophageal motility disorders present with a spectrum of symptoms where manometry plays an important role. We designed this study to evaluate the utility of esophageal manometry among various symptoms. This is a single-center observational study conducted over 5 years in a tertiary referral center. A total of 564 patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) using a 16-channel water perfusion system were included in the study. Their clinical profile and manometric findings, as per the Chicago classification version 4.0, were recorded, and the diagnostic utility of HREM with respect to symptoms was studied. Motility disorders were identified in 48.8% of patients, the most common being Achalasia cardia (32.4%). Dysphagia (55.5%) was the most common indication of manometry, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (34.9%), chest pain (6.2%), and symptoms such as belching, globus, and hiccoughs (3.4%). Among those who were re-classified from Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0, 21.2% had a newer diagnosis. Among the patients with dysphagia, HREM revealed the highest yield of detecting an abnormal esophageal motility test (70.6%); meanwhile, this yield was much lower in those with GERD (21.8%), chest pain (22.8%), and other symptoms (15.7%). The most common finding among those with dysphagia was Achalasia cardia (55.9%), while the study was normal among those with GERD (78.1%), chest pain (77.1%), and other symptoms (84.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of dysphagia for major motility disorders were 65% and 91%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 90%. HREM has high accuracy and a good diagnostic yield among patients with dysphagia, with the most common finding being Achalasia cardia.

Manometric Abnormalities in Patients With and Without Chronic Cough

PurposeThis study examines the relationship between chronic cough and vagal hypersensitivity by measuring baseline esophageal motility, with interest in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Materials and methodsPatients undergoing workup for dysphagia were assigned to a chronic cough or control group based on self-reported symptoms. Differences in demographics, medical comorbidities, and high resolution esophageal manometry findings were obtained retrospectively. Results62.5% of our cohort had chronic cough (30/48). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to sex, age, and race/ethnicity. Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was the only statistically significant predictor of CC (OR 74.04, p = 0.010). Cough patients had upper esophageal sphincter relaxation duration (734 ms) significantly longer than the non-cough patients (582 ms; p = 0.03), though both groups had similar upper esophageal mean basal pressure, mean residual pressure, relaxation time-to-nadir, and recovery time. No significant difference was found in the median intrabolus pressure and UES motility mean peak pressure between groups. ConclusionSubtle differences in high-resolution manometry between patients with and without cough suggest, in line with previous studies, baseline alterations of upper esophageal function may manifest in patients with chronic cough through an undetermined mechanism that may include underlying vagal hypersensitivity. These findings encourage further manometric study examining the relationship between UES dysfunction and chronic cough.

Esophageal Mucosal Impedance Assessment for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is sometimes challenging because the performance of available tests is not entirely satisfactory. This study aims to directly measure the esophageal mucosal impedance during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD. Sixty participants with typical symptoms of GERD underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and mucosal impedance measurement. Mucosal impedance measurement was performed at 2, 5, 10, and 18 cm above the esophagogastric junction during gastrointestinal endoscopy using a specific catheter developed based on devices described in the literature over the last decade. The patients were divided into groups A (acid exposure time < 4%) and B (acid exposure time ≥ 4%). The mucosal impedance was significantly lower in group B at 2 cm (2264.4 Ω ± 1099.0 vs 4575.0 Ω ± 1407.6 [group A]) and 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (4221.2 Ω ± 2623.7 vs 5888.2 Ω ± 2529.4 [group A]). There was no significant difference in the mucosal impedance between the 2 groups at 10 cm and 18 cm above the esophagogastric junction. Mucosal impedance value at 2 cm > 2970 Ω resulted in a sensitivity of 96.4% and a specificity of 87.5% to exclude GERD. Direct measurement of mucosal impedance during endoscopy is a simple and promising method for diagnosing GERD. Individuals with an abnormal acid exposure time have lower mucosal impedance measurements than those with a normal acid exposure time.

Comparative evaluation of single versus double leg raise maneuver in high-resolution esophageal manometry.

The straight leg raise (SLR) maneuver, often performed during esophageal manometry, requires patients to lift their leg(s) to augment intraabdominal pressure (IAP). Diverse techniques have been applied for SLR. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of SLR between single and double leg raises. During esophageal manometry, patients were asked to raise one leg, followed by elevating both legs. The efficacy of SLR for (1) detecting hiatal hernia, (2) increasing IAP, and (3) predicting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with intraesophageal pressure (IEP) was assessed. The value of change in impedance to indicate reflux during SLR in predicting esophageal acid exposure was investigated. The leg raise procedures were performed in 86 patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry. Both the single and double leg raises exhibited a higher hiatal hernia detection rate compared to the landmark (p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). Double leg raise was more effective in raising IAP by >50% compared to single leg raise (100% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.001), increasing yield by 53.6%. The change in IAP showed a positive correlation with the change in IEP during double leg raise (r = 0.31; p = 0.004), higher than that for single leg raise (r = 0.23; p = 0.03). Lower intraesophageal impedance during SLR was associated with AET > 6% with double leg raise (1.5 kΩ vs. 2.5 kΩ, p = 0.04). Our study demonstrates the efficacy of both single and double leg raise maneuvers during HREMI in increasing hiatal hernia detection and possible value in predicting GERD. The double leg raise resulted in a higher rate of effective increase in IAP, potentially enabling more patients to undergo effective SLR during HREMI.

Ineffective esophageal motility: Characterization and outcomes across pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility centers in the United States.

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) on high-resolution manometry (HRM) is not consistently associated with specific clinical syndromes or outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence, clinical features, management, and outcomes of pediatric IEM patients across the United States. Clinical and manometric characteristics of children undergoing esophageal HRM during 2021-2022 were collected from 12 pediatric motility centers. Clinical presentation, test results, management strategies, and outcomes were compared between children with IEM and normal HRM. Of 236 children (median age 15 years, 63.6% female, 79.2% Caucasian), 62 (23.6%) patients had IEM, and 174 (73.7%) patients had normal HRM, with similar demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, and median symptom duration. Reflux monitoring was performed more often for IEM patients (25.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.002), but other adjunctive testing was similar. Among 101 patients with follow-up, symptomatic cohorts declined in both groups in relation to the initial presentation (p > 0.107 for each comparison) with management targeting symptoms, particularly acid suppression. Though prokinetics were used more often and behavioral therapy less often in IEM (p ≤ 0.015 for each comparison), symptom outcomes were similar between IEM and normal HRM. Despite a higher proportion with residual dysphagia on follow-up in IEM (64.0% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.043), an alternate mechanism for dysphagia was identified more often in IEM (68.8%) compared to normal HRM (27.8%, p = 0.017). IEM is a descriptive manometric pattern rather than a clinical diagnosis requiring specific intervention in children. Management based on clinical presentation provides consistent symptom outcomes.