Higher Rates Of Revision Surgery Research Articles

Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review.

Failure rates among primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) range from 3.2% to 11.1%. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement. The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR. There is a convincingly higher re-tear and revision rate in patients who undergo ACLR with allograft than autograft, especially amongst the young, athletic population. Unrecognized Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Given the high rates of revision surgery in young active patients who return to pivoting sports, the authors recommend strong consideration of a combined ACLR + Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) or Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Careful consideration of patient-specific factors such as age and activity level may influence the success of ACL reconstruction. Additional technical considerations including graft choice and fixation method, tunnel position, evaluation of concomitant posterolateral corner and high-grade pivot shift injuries, and the role of excessive posterior tibial slope may play a significant role in preventing failure.

Increased Risk for Non-Union in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis following High-Velocity Reaming: A Retrospective Study

Objective: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a reliable procedure for treating various pathologies related to this joint. However, non-union is a common and debilitating complication of the procedure. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the use of a mechanical reamer to prepare the joint surface increases the risk of non-union compared to traditional manual osteotomy. Methods: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent their first MTPJ arthrodesis surgery in our medical center between 2010 and 2015. The articular surface preparation of the MTPJ was either manually performed (Group 1) or mechanically conducted with reamers (Group 2). Data regarding demographic characteristics, indications for surgery, osteosynthesis methods, and post-operative complications, including non-union, infection, and revision rates, were collected for all patients. Results: A total of 83 patients with 92 primary first MTPJ arthrodesis (44 cases in Group 1 and 48 cases in Group 2) were included with a mean follow-up time of 45.3 months (SD 16.8). The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, indication for surgery, and follow-up time. The non-union rate was 15.9% in Group 1 and 25% in Group 2 (p = 0.28). Group 2 showed a significantly higher rate of revision surgery compared to Group 1 (43.7% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The mechanical reamer group had a higher non-union rate and a significantly higher rate of revision surgery compared to low-energy manual joint preparation. In light of these findings, the use of mechanical reamers for joint preparation in the first MTPJ arthrodesis was discontinued at our medical center.

Impact of mastectomy flap necrosis on prepectoral reconstructive outcomes

IntroductionAs reconstructive surgeons have increasingly transitioned to the pre-pectoral plane for prosthetic breast reconstruction, the implications of mastectomy skin flap necrosis have become more concerning. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of skin flap necrosis on reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing immediate two-stage pre-pectoral reconstruction at a single center with at least 3-month follow-up. Postoperative complication, reconstructive outcome, and time to final implant were compared between patients with and without mastectomy skin necrosis. ResultsA total of 301 patients underwent 509 pre-pectoral breast reconstructions. Forty-four patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Demographic and reconstructive characteristics were similar between the necrosis and no necrosis cohorts. Patients with skin necrosis were more likely to undergo reoperation after tissue expander (64% vs 19%, p<0.01) and undergo expander replacement (13.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.02). However, rates of reconstructive failure (6.8% vs 6.2%), major infection (9.1% vs 9.0%), and minor infection (13.6% vs 17.5%) after expander placement were statistically similar. Patients with skin necrosis trended towards longer time before final implant placement, though not statistically significant (6.5 vs 5.0 months, p=0.08). There was no difference in complication rates between the necrosis and no necrosis cohort after final implant placement. There was a higher rate of revision surgery after implant placement in the necrosis cohort (12.5% vs 4.1%, p=0.047). ConclusionMastectomy skin flap necrosis is a concerning postoperative event, particularly in patients with pre-pectoral prostheses. We observed that patients with skin necrosis experience higher reoperation rates in the expander period, yet have similar infection rates and achieve similar final reconstructive outcomes compared to patients without necrosis.

Risks associated with chronic cannabis use on opioid use, length of stay, and revision rate for patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTOpioids are commonly prescribed to treat spinal pain, especially those undergoing surgery. Cannabis has been suggested as an agent that can modulate opioid needs in these patients. PURPOSETo investigate the effect of cannabis use on perioperative opioid requirement and revision surgery rate in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 48,499 patients from PearlDiver national database who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion. OUTCOME MEASURESOpioid-use rates, MME, length of stay, and revision rates. METHODSUsing PearlDiver, we identified patients for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), cannabis use disorder, revision lumbar fusion, demographics, and comorbidities. Cannabis users and non-users were propensity matched for age, sex, and tobacco use. Pre and postoperative cumulative morphine milli equivalence (MME) were calculated. Opioid-use rates, MME, length of stay (LOS), and revision rates were compared using univariate analysis. Revision rates were compared using Kaplan-Meyer log-rank analysis, and logistic and cox regression. RESULTSOf 48,499 patients undergoing PLIF, 3.4% were identified as chronic cannabis users. They were younger, and more likely to be male and use tobacco. They had a higher rate and amount of opioid use within 90-days preoperatively, and 90- and 365-days postoperatively, after controlling for age, sex, and tobacco use. Cannabis users had longer LOS (4.4 vs 4.0 days), and a higher rate of revision surgery (6.9% vs 3.2%). Log-rank analysis, as well as logistic and cox regression confirmed an increased revision rate. Concurrent tobacco and cannabis use also had an additive effect on revision rate to 8.1%, compared with those who used only cannabis (5.4%) or tobacco (4.5%). CONCLUSIONSChronic cannabis use is associated with an increased preoperative and long-term postoperative opioid use, a longer length of stay, and an increased revision rate.

Update on post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but serious. Few studies carried out on small cohorts have reported them in the literature. The aim of this work is to describe the specific characteristics of post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures, and the outcome of their surgical treatment in terms of function and complications. Patients with this type of fracture were identified retrospectively over a period of six years (January 2016 to December 2021). The following data were collected: demographic characteristics, date of insertion of the prosthesis, details of the intervention, date of the trauma, characteristics of the fracture, and type of treatment. Functional results were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Data concerning complications of treatment were collected. Our series included 20 patients, with a mean age of 77 years (46 to 90). All the patients had at least one comorbid condition. Radiographs showed that 75% of the fractures were pure transverse fractures, and a transverse component was present in 90% of patients. All our patients underwent surgical treatment: open reduction and internal fixation, revision of the acetabular component, or both. Mean follow-up was 24 months, and HHS at last follow-up was 75.5 (42 to 95). The principal complications observed were dislocations of the prosthesis (30%) and infections (20%). A need for revision surgery was noted in 30% of patients. No dislocation occurred in patients undergoing osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction. We did not note either mechanical loosening of the acetabular component nor thromboembolic complications. In all, 30% of patients presented acute anemia requiring transfusion, and one death was reported. Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures frequently have a transverse component that can destabilize the acetabular implant. The frequency of complications, principally dislocations, led to a high rate of revision surgery. Improvements in preoperative planning should make it possible to codify management to reduce this high rate of complications. The best results were obtained when the surgical strategy combined osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction.

Retrospective Review of Complications and Revision Rates Between Isolated Talonavicular vs Talonavicular and Subtalar (Double) Arthrodesis vs Triple Arthrodesis.

Hindfoot fusion procedures are common for the treatment of end-stage arthritis or deformity. Surgical treatments for these conditions include talonavicular joint (single) arthrodesis, talonavicular and subtalar (double) arthrodesis, or talonavicular, subtalar, and calcaneocuboid (triple) arthrodesis. This study evaluated the complication rate, revision surgery rate, and hardware removal rate for those treated with either single, double, or triple arthrodesis. A retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent single (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 28740), double (CPT 28725 and 28740), or triple (CPT 28715) arthrodesis to treat hindfoot arthritis/deformity (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code: 734, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes: M76821, M76822, and M76829) from 2005 to 2022 using the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs databank. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, procedure data, and postoperative outcomes within 1 year of principal surgery. Student t test, chi-squared test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis were utilized during data analysis. A total of 433 patients were identified, with 248 undergoing single arthrodesis, 67 undergoing double arthrodesis, and 118 undergoing triple arthrodesis. There was no significant difference between single, double, and triple arthrodesis in the rate of complications, hardware removals, revision surgeries, or 30-day readmission when controlling for confounding variables. However, a decrease in Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was found to be predictive of an increase in the revision surgery rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.85, P = .02). We found no difference in the rate of complications, hardware removals, or revision surgeries in those undergoing single, double, or triple arthrodesis. Surprisingly we found that a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, indicating a healthier patient had a significant relationship with a higher rate of revision surgery. Further study including radiographic indications for surgery or the impact of overall health status on revision surgery rates may further elucidate the other components of this relationship. Level III, cohort study.

Augmented versus non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails for treating trochanteric fractures in patients over sixty-five years of age.

Intramedullary nailing is a common treatment for pertrochanteric fractures. However, implant-related mechanical failures, such as cut-out and cut-through, lead to higher rates of revision surgery, loss of autonomy, and mortality. Cemented augmentation enhances the bone-implant interface. This study compared the frequency of mechanical failures between augmented and non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails. This descriptive, retrospective study at a level 1 trauma centre included patients aged > 65years with pertrochanteric fractures treated by a short augmented or non-augmented TFNA nail. The primary outcome was the comparison of cut-out or cut-through rates between groups at three and sixmonths postoperatively. Of the 181 patients analysed, 103 had augmented TFNA nails and 78 had non-augmented TFNA nails. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographic characteristics, AO/OTA classification, or quality of reduction. The failure rate was significantly lower in the augmented group than in the non-augmented group: 1 (0.97%) versus 9 (11.54%) (p = 0.005). At sixmonths postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning functional recovery, as measured by the Parker and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions scores. For patients aged over 65years, the use of the augmented TFNA nail may reduce the risk of fixation failures such as cut-out.

Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation.

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE. This was a retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates. Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007). Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups.

Midterm outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after internal hemipelvectomy and iliofemoral arthrodesis.

Recent studies have reported acceptable outcomes after arthrodesis takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty(THA); however, there are no reports on outcomes after oncologic resection, which are inherently complex and may portend poorer outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent prior hemipelvectomy for tumor resection and were later converted to THA. All patients who had prior iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic resection that were later converted to THA at a single institution were examined. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, operative information, functional outcomes, and complications/reoperations. All three patients in this study were males who underwent internal hemipelvectomies for chondrosarcoma. Patients were converted to THA at a mean of 26 years after arthrodesis. Mean follow-up after conversion to THA was 7.4 years. During this follow-up period, two of the three patients required revision surgery. At last follow-up, the mean Harris Hip Score was 81 and the mean Mayo Hip Score was 67, and all patients were ambulatory without significant pain. Overall, patients who undergo iliofemoral arthrodesis after oncologic hemipelvectomy and are later converted to THA can expect to have a reasonable outcome, despite a high rate of complications and revision surgery.

Inpatient charges, complication, and revision rates for shoulder arthroplasty in Parkinson disease: a regional database study.

Parkinson disease (PD) is an established risk factor for higher rates of complications and revision surgery following shoulder arthroplasty, yet the economic burden of PD remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of complication and revisions as well as inpatient charges for shoulder arthroplasty procedures between PD and non-PD patients using an all-payer statewide database. Patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty from 2010 to 2020 were identified from the New York (NY) Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Study groups were assigned based on concomitant diagnosis of PD at the time of index procedure. Baseline demographics, inpatient data, and medical comorbidities were collected. Primary outcomes measured were accommodation, ancillary, and total inpatient charges. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complication and reoperation rates. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate effect of PD on shoulder arthroplasty revision and complication rates. All statistical analysis was performed using R. A total of 39,011 patients (429 PD vs. 38,582 non-PD) underwent 43,432 primary shoulder arthroplasties (477 PD vs. 42,955 non-PD) with mean follow-up duration of 2.9 ± 2.8 years. The PD cohort was older (72.3 ± 8.0 vs. 68.6 ± 10.4 years, P<.001), with greater male composition (50.8% vs. 43.0%, P=.001), and higher mean Elixhauser scores (1.0 ± 4.6 vs. 7.2 ± 4.3, P<.001). The PD cohort had significantly greater accommodation charges ($10,967 vs. $7,661, P<.001) and total inpatient charges ($62,000 vs. $56,000, P<.001). PD patients had significantly higher rates of revision surgery (7.7% vs. 4.2%, P=.002) and complications (14.1% vs. 10.5%, P=.040), as well as significantly higher incidences of readmission at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. After controlling for age and baseline comorbidities, PD patients had 1.64 times greater odds of reoperation compared to non-PD patients (95% CI 1.10, 2.37; P=.012) and a hazard ratio of 1.54 for reoperation when evaluating revision-free survival following primary shoulder arthroplasty (95% CI 1.07, 2.20; P=.019). PD confers a longer length of stay, higher rates of postoperative complications and revisions, and greater inpatient charges in patients undergoing TSA. Knowledge of the associated risks and resource requirements of this population will aid surgeons in their decision making as they continue to provide care to a growing number of patients affected by PD.

WTP5.9 Does anti-reflux surgery offer durable symptom remission in a tertiary centre?

Abstract Aims Anti-reflux surgery success can be affected by multiple factors. We sought to evaluate pre-operative and technical factors influencing medium-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in a tertiary centre between 2016 and 2019. Patients were identified through clinical coding. Electronic patient records were reviewed with minimum follow up of 3 years. Outcomes analysed included pre-operative work-up, type of fundoplication, remission and relapse of symptoms at follow up and revision surgery. Results 104 patients underwent fundoplication. The majority were Nissen 68 (65%) and the remaining were partial wrap configuration.18 (19%) of these patients were revisional anti-reflux procedures. Pre-operative investigations noted most underwent endoscopy 85 (81.7%) and oesophageal physiology in 74 (71.2%) with barium swallow in 34 (32.7%). 15/104 (14%) underwent all three studies. 50 (48.1%) patients were symptomatic at initial follow up with dysphagia (21.3%) and dyspepsia (13.5%) most prevalent. Of these 104 patients, 15 (14.4%) required revisional surgery. 6/36 (17%) partial and 9/68 Nissen (13.2%) fundoplications underwent re-operation. Timing of revision varied: 8 (53.3%) within one year including early 30-day re-operation for complications. 3 (20%) at 1-3years and 4 (26.7%) after 3 years. Subsequent revision rate was higher for revisional patients: 4/18 (22.2%) compared to primary 11/86 (12.7%). Conclusion Almost half of the patients had at least one symptom at initial follow up, however only 14.4% patients required revisional surgery by 3 years follow up. Partial fundoplication and previous fundoplication surgery had higher revision surgery rates.

Spinal Cord Stimulators and Intrathecal Pain Pump Removal Versus Retention During Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Retrospective cohort study. To determine risks associated with posterior lumbar arthrodesis after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) and intrathecal pain pump (IPP) insertion. SCS and IPPs aid in the management of chronic back and radicular pain. Little is known regarding the risks of subsequent fusion with these devices in place. The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for spinal fusion between 2010 and 2020. Study groups were created for indwelling SCS or IPP and matched to a separate cohort without SCS or IPP. Subgroups were created for those who had their device removed and those who retained their device at the time of surgery. Complications up to 2 years postoperatively were reviewed and confounding variables were controlled using multivariable logistic regression. Four thousand five hundred three patients had an indwelling SCS/IPP and underwent posterior lumbar fusion. Compared with patients without history of an SCS/IPP, patients undergoing a lumbar fusion with an SCS/IPP which was removed or retained had higher rates of revision surgery at 1 year [7.3% vs. 5.0%, odds ratio (OR) =1.48, P <0.001] and 2 year (10.8% vs. 7.0%, OR =1.59, P <0.001). For all time intervals, there were higher odds of instrumentation failure (2y: OR =1.65, P <0.001), and pulmonary complications (2y: OR =1.18, P <0.001). At 2 years, there were higher odds of surgical site complications (OR 1.15, P =0.02) and urinary complications (OR=1.07, P =0.04). There were no differences in complications up to 2 years postoperatively in patients with an SCS/IPP who had their devices retained or removed ( P >0.05). Patients with a history of spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal pain pumps are at increased risk of mechanical complications and revision fusion compared with patients without these devices. Patients with an SCS or IPP have similar rates of complications during lumbar fusion whether the device is removed or retained.

Surgical Fixation Method in Lower Extremity Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction After Oncologic Resection: A Comparison of Plates and Nails.

Fixation in intercalary allograft reconstruction includes plates and intramedullary nails. The purpose of this study was to examine rates of nonunion, fracture, the overall need for revision surgery, and allograft survival based on the surgical fixation method in lower extremity intercalary allografts. A retrospective chart review was performed on 51 patients with intercalary allograft reconstruction in the lower extremity. Fixation methods compared were intramedullary fixation with nails (IMN) and extramedullary fixation with plates (EMP). Complications compared were nonunion, fracture, and wound complications. The alpha was set at 0.05 for statistical analysis. Nonunion incidence at all allograft-to-native bone junction sites was 21% (IMN) and 25% (EMP) ( P = 0.8). Fracture incidence was 24% (IMN) and 32% (EMP) ( P = 0.75). Median fracture-free allograft survival was 7.9 years (IMN) and 3.2 years (EMP) ( P = 0.04). Infection was seen in 18% (IMN) and 12% (EMP) ( P = 0.7). The overall need for revision surgery was 59% (IMN) and 71% (EMP) ( P = 0.53). Allograft survival at the final follow-up was 82% (IMN) and 65% (EMP) ( P = 0.33). When the EMP group was subdivided into single plate (SP) and multiple plate (MP) groups and compared with the IMN groups, fracture rates were 24% (IMN), 8% (SP), and 48% (MP) ( P = 0.04). Rates of revision surgery were 59% (IMN), 46% (SP), and 86% (MP) ( P = 0.04). Allograft survival at the final follow-up was 88% (IMN), 92% (SP), and 52% (MP) ( P = 0.05). Median fracture-free allograft survival was notably longer for the IMN group than the EMP group; otherwise, there were no notable differences between the intramedullary and extramedullary groups. When the EMP group was subdivided into the SP and MP groups, patients with MPs had higher rates of fracture, higher rates of revision surgery, and lower overall allograft survival. III, Therapeutic Study, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Is Fluoroquinolone Exposure after Primary Tendon Repair Associated with Higher Rates of Reoperations? A Matched Cohort Study.

The association between tendon damage and fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics has been well documented. However, there is limited data evaluating the impact of postoperative FQ use on outcomes of primary tendon repairs. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of reoperation for patients with FQ exposure after primary tendon repair versus controls. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database. All patients who underwent primary repair of distal biceps ruptures, Achilles tendon ruptures, and rotator cuff tears were identified. For each tendon, patients who were prescribed FQs within 90 days postoperatively were propensity score matched at a 1:3 ratio with controls without postoperative FQ prescriptions across age, sex, and several comorbidities. Rates of reoperation were compared at two years postoperatively with multivariable logistic regression. A total of 124,322 patients who underwent primary tendon procedures were identified, including 3,982 (3.2%) patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days postoperatively: 448 with distal biceps repair, 2,538 with rotator cuff repair, and 996 with Achilles tendon repair. These cohorts were matched with 1,344, 7,614, and 2,988 controls, respectively. Patients with postoperative FQ prescriptions exhibited significantly higher rates of revision surgery after primary repair of distal biceps ruptures (3.6% vs.1.7%; OR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04), rotator cuff tears (7.1% vs.4.1%; OR 1.77; 95% CI, 1.48-2.15), and Achilles tendon ruptures (3.8% vs.1.8%; OR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.40-3.27). Patients with FQ prescriptions within 90 days after primary tendon repair demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperations for distal biceps, rotator cuff, and Achilles tendon repair at two years postoperatively. To achieve optimal outcomes and avoid complications in patients following primary tendon repair procedures, physicians should consider prescribing alternative non-FQ antibiotics and counsel patients on the risk of reoperation associated with postoperative FQ use.

Concomitant Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Reduces the Risk of Revision Surgery After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for the Treatment of Patellar Instability

To compare postoperative complication rates between patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and those who underwent MPFLR with tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in a large-scale study. A secondary goal was to investigate demographic associations with outcomes. Patients who underwent MPFLR (n= 3,480) or MPFLR-TTO (n= 615) for patellar instability were identified in the PearlDiver database. Rates of surgery for infection, procedures for knee stiffness, patellar fracture, and revision MPFLR within 2 years postoperatively were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Demographic associations with outcomes were also investigated. The MPFLR-TTO cohort exhibited a significantly lower rate of revision surgery at 2 years (0.8% vs 1.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.80; P= .036) when compared with the MPFLR group. Independent of index procedure, patients younger than 21 years had significantly lower rates of requiring procedures for knee stiffness (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.22-0.54; P < .001) and any complication at 2years (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.78; P < .001) when compared with older patients. Male patients displayed a significantly lower rate of requiring procedures for knee stiffness at 2 years than female patients (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.78; P= .007). Tobacco use was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection at 2 years (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.00-5.38; P= .046). The MPFLR cohort exhibited higher rates of revision surgery at 2 years compared with the MPFLR-TTO cohort. Patient age under 21 years was associated with lower rates of any complication and requiring procedures for knee stiffness, male sex was associated with a lower rate of requiring procedures for knee stiffness, and tobacco use was associated with a higher rate of surgery for postoperative infection. This information can assist surgeons when counseling patients before these procedures are performed. Level III, retrospective, comparative prognostic trial.

Social determinants of health influence clinical outcomes of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the collection of environmental, institutional, and intrinsic conditions that may bias access to, and utilization of, health care across an individual's lifetime. The effects of SDOH are associated with disparities in patient-reported outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty, but its impact on rotator cuff repair (RCR) is poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the influences that SDOH have on accessing appropriate orthopedic treatment, as well as its effects on patient-reported outcomes following RCR. This systematic review was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and guidelines outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration. A search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until March 2022 was conducted to identify studies reporting at least 1 SDOH and its effect on access to health care, clinical outcomes, or patient-reported outcomes following RCR. The search term was created with reference to the PROGRESS-Plus framework. Methodological quality of included primary studies was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized studies. Thirty-two studies (level I-IV evidence) from 18 journals across 7 countries, published between 1999 and 2022, met inclusion criteria, including 102,372 patients, 669 physical therapy (PT) clinics, and 71 orthopedic surgery practices. Multivariate analysis revealed female gender, labor-intensive occupation and worker's compensation claims, comorbidities, tobacco use, federally subsidized insurance, lower education level, racial or ethnic minority status, low-income place of residence and low-volume surgery regions, unemployment, and preoperative narcotic use contribute to delays in access to health care and/or more severe disease state on presentation. Black race patients were found to have significantly worse postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes and experienced more pain following RCR. Furthermore, Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to present to low-volume surgeons and low-volume facilities. A lower education level was shown to be an independent predictor of poor surgical and patient-reported outcomes as well as increased pain and worse patient satisfaction. Patients with federally subsidized insurance demonstrated significantly worse postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcomes CONCLUSIONS: The impediments created by SDOH lead to worse clinical and patient-reported outcomes following RCR including increased risk of postoperative complications, failed repair, higher rates of revision surgery, and decreased ability to return to work. Orthopedic surgeons, policy makers, and insurers should be aware of the aforementioned SDOH as markers for characteristics that may predispose to inferior outcomes following RCR.

Comparative Success of Repair Versus Reconstruction for Knee Extra-articular Ligament Injuries.

Surgical techniques and associated outcomes in treating acute and chronic extra-articular ligament knee injuries are in evolution, and there is question as to whether repair or reconstruction is optimal. The purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent surgery rate between surgical repair versus reconstruction for all extra-articular ligament injuries of the knee utilizing a large database. Our hypothesis was that overall surgical repair of both lateral and medial extra-articular knee injuries would have a higher revision rate than those treated by reconstruction. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. The PearlDiver Mariner data set (2010-2019), with 122 million patients, was utilized to generate 2 patient cohorts: those who underwent surgical repair and those who underwent surgical reconstruction of a knee extra-articular ligament injury. All patients had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Rates of concomitant or subsequent cruciate ligament reconstruction and rates of secondary procedures were assessed and compared between the 2 cohorts. In total, 3563 patients were identified: extra-articular ligament reconstruction was performed for 2405 (67.5%), and repair was performed for 1158 (32.5%). Cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed for 986 (27.7%), of which 888 of 986 (90.1%) were performed on the same day as their extra-articular ligament procedure. At 2-year follow-up, the reconstruction cohort had higher rates of revision surgery compared with the repair cohort (8.2% vs 2.5%; P < .001). Using a large national database, knee extra-articular ligamentous reconstructions (those on both the lateral and the medial side) had a 3.3 times higher rate of revision surgery compared with repair at 2-year follow-up. Further study is needed to investigate the causes leading to revision surgery and to determine the optimal surgical treatment for both medial and lateral extra-articular knee ligament injuries.

Short-Segment versus Long-Segment Spinal Fusion Constructs for the Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

To compare clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis undergoing short-segment versus long-segment spinal fusion. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with degenerative thoracolumbar scoliosis undergoing elective spinal fusion at a single academic medical center. Cohorts were divided into short-segment (<3) or long-segment (≥3) groups. A total of 197 patients (122 short, 75 long) were included. Patients undergoing short-segment fusion more frequently presented with radiculopathy (P < 0.001) and had greater baseline visual analog scale (VAS) leg scores (P < 0.001). Patients with long-segment fusions had longer hospital length of stay (short, 3.82 ± 2.98 vs. long, 7.40 ± 6.85 days; P < 0.001), lower home discharge rates (short, 80.3% vs. long, 51.8; P= 0.003), higher revision surgery rates (short, 10.77% vs. long, 25.3%; P= 0.012), and greater percentage curve correction (short, 37.3% ± 25.9% vs. long, 45.1% ± 23.9%; P= 0.048). No significant differences were noted in postoperative complication rates (short, 1.64% vs. long, 5.33%; P= 0.143). At 1 year, patients with long fusions had worse ΔOswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P= 0.024), ΔVAS leg score (P= 0.002), and VAS leg minimum clinically important difference % (P= 0.003). Multivariate regression found that short-segment fusions were associated with greater improvements in ODI (P= 0.029), Physical Component Summary-12 (P= 0.024), and VAS leg score at 1 year (P= 0.002). Patients undergoing short-segment fusions more frequently presented with radiculopathy and had higher preoperative VAS leg scores compared with those receiving long constructs. Short-construct fusions in appropriately selected patients may provide satisfactory improvements in patient-reported outcome measures, particularly ΔODI and ΔVAS leg score, and mitigate hospital length of stay, revision surgery rates, and nonhome discharge.

High Rate of Revision Surgery After Limited Decompression of Lumbar Facet Cysts.

The surgical treatment of lumbar facet cysts has long been debated. Some surgeons elect for limited decompression of such cysts while other surgeons elect for primary decompression and fusion over concerns for recurrence and instability. Previous studies have suggested the rate of revision surgery after facet cyst excision to be as low as 1%, whereas others have reported this rate to be markedly higher. In this study, we examined revision surgery rates and patient-reported outcomes and conducted a radiographic analysis to identify predictors of failure after limited decompression of lumbar facet cysts. A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of patients treated at our institution using the Current Procedural Terminology code 63267 before January 2018 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was revision surgery at the index level for recurrence or instability or a minimum 2-year follow-up without revision surgery. Secondary outcome measures include radiographic assessments of preoperative and postoperative spondylolisthesis and patient-reported outcome measures. Using preoperative MRI studies, an analysis of facet angles at the surgical level was conducted and the presence, location, and amount of facet fluid were calculated. A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 93 patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Of these, 19 had undergone a revision surgery at the index level for cyst recurrence or instability. The revision rate for this group was 20.4%. The median time to initial revision surgery was 2.2 years. The median time from index operation to last follow-up was 3.8 years. No differences were observed between the groups regarding the presence of preoperative spondylolisthesis, age, sex, body mass index, blood loss, or patient demographics. 60.2% of all procedures were done at the L4-5 level, but this level accounted for 73.7% of primary failures. A radiographic analysis showed facet angle >45° at L4-5 to be associated with risk of failure of primary decompression. The presence and absolute amount of fluid in the facets were not associated with risk of failure at the L4-5 level. Our revision rate of 20.4% is higher than what is commonly reported in the literature. The radiographic analysis shows that at the L4-5 level, a facet angle of >45° is associated with failure of primary decompression.

High-rate of long-term revision surgery due to weight regain after Laparoscopic Gastric Greater Curvature Plication (LGGCP)

PurposeTo present the long-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic gastric greater curvature plication (LGGCP) in terms of weight loss and revision surgery rate. Material and methodsThis single-center study involved a retrospective analysis of patients that underwent revision surgery after LGGCP due to weight regain. Demographic and anthropometric data, comorbidities, operation time, hospital stays, mortalities, and immediate and long-term postoperative complications were analyzed. Postoperative Body Mass Index (BMI), %total weight loss (TWL), and complications were collected during follow-up. ResultsOf the 75 patients that underwent LGGCP at our hospital from March 2013 to February 2016, 13 (13/75, 17.3%) underwent revision surgery. All patients except one opted for sleeve gastrectomy. The mean interval between LGGCP and revision surgery was 71.0 ± 12.0 months (range, 54.8–93.6), and mean body weight, BMI, and TWL at revision were 89.2 ± 11.3 kg, 33.9 ± 4.2 kg/m2, and 4.7 ± 9.3%, respectively. The main reason for revision was weight regain. Additional problems were chronic intermittent GERD (4/13, 30.8%), dyspepsia (4/13,30.8%), and chronic relapsing melena (1/13, 7.7%). Two patients experienced immediate postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo II and III). At one year after revision surgery, the mean body weight, BMI, and additional %TWL from revision surgery were 63.0 ± 5.3 kg, 24.0 ± 2.9 kg/m2, and 28.7 ± 8.0%, respectively. One of four patients (1/4, 25%) that complained of GERD before revision surgery, was still on PPI medication at 1 year after revision surgery. ConclusionAlthough LGGCP showed initial acceptable weight loss outcomes, long term (>5 years) follow-up showed that LGGCP is associated with a high rate of revision surgery (17.3%) due to weight regain.