Higher Rate Of Perioperative Complications Research Articles

Enhancing Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery with Wearable Augmented Reality Assistance System: A Matched-Pair Analysis

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the first wearable augmented reality assistance system (ARAS) specifically designed for pancreatic surgery and its impact on perioperative outcomes. Background: Pancreatic surgery remains highly complex and is associated with a high rate of perioperative complications. ARAS, as an intraoperative assistance system, has the potential to reduce these complications. Methods: This prospective, single-center study included 20 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery using ARAS. These patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio with 60 patients from our retrospective data who underwent standard pancreatic resection. Matching variables were selected based on factors associated with poor intraoperative outcomes. Results: A higher proportion of patients in the ARAS group were diagnosed with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (20.0% vs 6.7%, P = 0.085). Additionally, more patients in the ARAS group required arterial resection compared with the control group (15.0% vs 0.0%, P = 0.002). Nevertheless, the ARAS group had a significantly shorter operative time (246 vs 299 minutes, P = 0.004) and required significantly fewer intraoperative blood transfusions (0.0 ± 0.0 vs 0.5 ± 1.4 units, P = 0.014). None of the patients in the ARAS group had positive resection margins (0.0% vs 20.0%, P = 0.045). Furthermore, patients in the ARAS group experienced a significantly shorter hospital stay (13.8 ± 6.6 vs 17.9 ± 8.2 days, P = 0.046). Conclusions: ARAS is a safe and effective assistance system for pancreatic surgery, offering superior perioperative outcomes compared with standard procedures.

Safety and risk analysis of total resection surgery for thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors: a decadal analysis of 103 cases

Study designRetrospective cohort study.PurposeTo explore the complications and risk factors for total resection (TR) of primary thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors over the past decade at our institution.MethodsPatients meeting inclusion criteria (primary spinal tumors, thoracic or lumbar location, TR at our center) were included. Demographic characteristics, surgical data, perioperative complications and management results were reviewed. Patients were stratified by tumor site, the number of excised segments, and recurrence status to elucidate distinctive characteristics.ResultsThe cohort comprised 103 patients, with a mean age of 35.8 years. On average, 1.83 vertebral segments were resected per patient. Perioperative complications were substantial, totaling 166 events, with 71 classified as major and 95 as minor, yielding an average of 1.61 complications per patient. No perioperative deaths occurred, but 79 patients (76.7%) experienced at least one complication. Multiple vertebral sections correlated with a higher complication rate (P = 0.031), and lumbar surgeries exhibited elevated risks of large vascular injury (P = 0.001), neurological deterioration, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared to thoracic cases. Conversely, thoracic spinal procedures showed a higher rate of pleural effusion (P = 0.004). Binary logistics stepwise regression identified multi-segmental resection as the independent risk factor for major perioperative complications.ConclusionsTR of primary spinal tumors is associated with a high perioperative complication rate, although most events have a favorable prognosis. Complication characteristics vary based on the surgical site, number of excised segments, and surgical history. A nuanced preoperative evaluating approach considering patient age, surgical segments, and extent of resection is crucial.

6998 Giant Pheochromocytoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Abstract Disclosure: B. Bahrani Fard: None. N. Nikravangolsefid: None. J. Maroun: None. A. Cross: None. T. Foster: None. T. McKenzie: None. W. Young Jr: None. B.M. Dy: None. M. Lyden: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Giant pheochromocytomas (PHEO), defined based on size > 10 cm, are rare. Data on clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of giant PHEOs are scarce. Objectives: to determine prevalence of giant PHEO and compare presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with giant vs non-giant PHEOs. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with giant PHEO and randomly chosen patients with non-giant PHEO (referents) at 6:1 ratio, evaluated between 2000-2023. All variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Of 828 patients with PHEO evaluated between 2000 and 2023, 31 (3.7%) had giant PHEO (median size 12 cm, IQR 10.0-13.5). In comparison to referents (n=186, median size 4 cm, IQR, 2.9-5.0), patients with giant PHEO were similar in age (median age 53 vs 55 years, P=.55), more frequently discovered based on symptoms (52% vs 32%, P=.04), and less likely to be bilateral (3% vs 12%, P=.31). Genetic testing was performed in 103 (48%) of patients, without group differences, however, patients with giant PHEO were less likely to have an associated germline mutation detected (7% vs 47%, P=.004). Patients with giant PHEO had more symptoms of catecholamine excess (median of 2 vs 1, P=.04) and presented with a higher prevalence of severe metanephrine excess >10 times above upper normal range (76% vs 30%, P<.0001). Adrenalectomy was performed in 94% of patients with giant PHEOs and in 100% referents, with higher rates of open adrenalectomy in giant PHEO (86% vs 14%, P<.0001). In addition to preoperative alpha-adrenergic blockade (89%), metyrosine was used in 14 (7%) patients, mostly in patients with giant PHEO (26% vs 3%, P<.0001). Patients with giant PHEO had a longer hospital length of stay (laparoscopic: median 5 vs 2 days, P<.0001; open: median 6 vs 5 days, P=.24), and a higher complication rate (31% vs 10%, P=.006).Median follow up was 3 years (IQR 1-8) years, similar in patients and referents. Metastases developed at a much higher rate in patients with giant PHEOs (45% vs 4% in referents, P<.0001). Disease specific mortality was 7% in patients with giant PHEOs and 0% in referents. Conclusion: Patients with giant PHEO were more symptomatic, had a higher degree of catecholamine excess, and a higher rate of perioperative complications. Almost half of patients with giant PHEO developed metastases, warranting a close follow-up. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Total en bloc spondylectomy for primary tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A review article

Primary spine tumors present significant clinical challenges due to their potential for local invasiveness and metastasis. Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) has emerged as a feasible surgical technique for the complete resection of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors, providing superior local control and long-term survival benefits. This review synthesized the current evidence and clinical experiences and demonstrated that TES achieved lower recurrence rates and higher disease-free survival than those of piecemeal resection. Despite the high perioperative complication rates, TES is essential for treating primary spine tumors. The importance of skilled surgical teams to optimize patient outcomes has been emphasized.

Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization for Acute Upper Limb Ischemia— A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

ObjectivesAcute upper limb ischaemia (AULI) is a medical emergency with high perioperative complication rates however these are poorly reported. The aim of this study is to report the complication rates following surgical revascularisation in AULI. MethodsRetrospective analysis of all patients undergoing brachial embolectomy for AULI from January 2010 to October 2021 were included. Data for baseline demographic characteristics, site of arterial occlusion, cancer status, and the potential underlying aetiology were included. Outcomes included technical success, early re-intervention, local and systemic complications, functional limb outcome at follow-up, and amputation. Results96 patients were identified. CT angiography was the first line diagnostic imaging modality, with the brachial bifurcation as the most common location for obstruction. The initial technical success rate was 76.4% (n=73). Major adverse events occurred in 11.5% patients (n=11); 8.3% had perioperative stroke and 7.3% resulted in in-hospital death (4.2% had both). Local complications occurred in 24%; 7.3% had site haematoma, 11.5% early thrombosis and 4.2% 30 day thrombosis. 2.1% resulted in amputation. No variables were identified as having significant association with local surgical complications. ConclusionAULI is often associated with underlying systemic and cardiac disorders. An evidence based approach to guide the non-operative management of AULI is lacking. In appropriately selected patients, Fogarty thrombectomy has a reasonable technical success rate, however the associated perioperative complication rate is high, both locally and systemically. Further studies of larger sample size are needed to identify negative predictors and reduce perioperative complications in this challenging cohort.

Fixation of rib fractures is beneficial for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a trauma quality improvement program study

BackgroundInternal fixation for multiple rib fractures is well established. Patients with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a higher rate of perioperative complications. It is unclear if these patients are suitable candidates for internal fixation and if surgical interventions are harmful to these patients.Study Design and methodsAdult patients with ≥ 3 rib fractures and underlying COPD from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The patients were divided into two treatment groups: operative and non-operative. Furthermore, inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to analyze mortality and adverse hospital events.ResultsPatients with COPD in the operative group had higher ventilator use (odds ratio [OR], 3.211; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.993–5.175; p < 0.001). Additionally, they had a longer length of stay (coefficient β, 4.139; standard error, 0.829; p < 0.001) and longer ventilator days (coefficient β, 1.937; standard error, 0.655; p = 0.003) than in the non-operative group. Furthermore, the mortality rate was lower in the operative group than in the non-operative group (OR, 0.426; 95% CI, 0.228–0.798; p = 0.008).ConclusionInternal fixation of rib fractures plays a crucial role in patients with underlying COPD disease. They presented a better mortality rate without an increased perioperative complication rate.

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Patients with Giant Pheochromocytoma: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Data on giant pheochromocytomas (PHEO), defined based on size ≥ 10 cm, are scarce. to compare presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with giant vs non-giant PHEOs. retrospective cohort study, 2000-2023. referral center. consecutive patients with giant PHEO and randomly chosen patients with non-giant PHEO (referents) at a 1:6 ratio. perioperative complications, metastases, mortality. Of 828 patients with PHEO, 31 (3.7%) had giant PHEO (median size 12 cm, IQR 10.0-13.5). In comparison to referents (n=186, median size 4 cm, IQR, 2.9-5.0), patients with giant PHEO had more symptoms of catecholamine excess (median of 2 vs 1, P=.04) and presented with a higher prevalence of severe catecholamine excess (76% vs 30%, P<.0001).Adrenalectomy was performed in 94% of patients with giant PHEOs and 100% referents. In addition to preoperative alpha-adrenergic blockade (89%), metyrosine was used in 14 (7%) patients, mostly in patients with giant PHEO (26% vs 3%, P<.0001). Patients with giant PHEO had a higher perioperative complication rate (31% vs 10%, P=.004).During a median follow-up of 3 years, metastases developed at a higher rate in patients with giant PHEOs (45% vs 4% in referents, P<.0001). Disease-specific mortality was 7% in patients with giant PHEOs and 0% in referents (P=.02). Patients with giant PHEO as compared to referents were more symptomatic, had a higher degree of catecholamine excess, and had a higher rate of perioperative complications. Almost half of patients with giant PHEO developed metastases, warranting a close follow-up.

Correlations Between Psychiatric Disorders and Perioperative Outcomes After Lumbar Fusions: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009–2020)

Preoperative diagnoses of psychiatric disorders have a demonstrated association with higher rates of perioperative complications. However, recent studies examining the influence of psychiatric disorders on lumbar fusion outcomes are scarce. Our objective was to determine the relationship between the most common psychiatric disorders and perioperative outcomes after lumbar fusion. Demographic and perioperative data for patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion between 2009 and 2020 were collected from the National Inpatient Sample database. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those who were previously diagnosed with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety, and those who were not. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were utilized to analyze the data. Of 2,877,241 patients identified in the National Inpatient Sample database as having undergone lumbar fusion, 647,951 had diagnosed psychiatric disorders, and the remaining 2,229,290 were the unaffected cohort. On multivariable analysis, patients diagnosed with psychiatric disorders had significantly increased odds of respiratory (odds ratio [OR]:1.09) and urinary (OR: 1.08) complications and experienced higher odds of mechanical injury (OR: 1.27), fusion disorders (OR: 1.62), dural tears (OR: 1.08), postprocedure anemia (OR: 1.29), longer hospital stays, and higher total costs (P < 0.001). Conversely, patients with psychiatric disorders had lower odds of neurologic injury (OR: 0.8) and wound complications (OR: 0.91) (P < 0.05). Patients with depression, bipolar disorder, or anxiety exhibited higher rates of certain types of complications. However, they appeared to have fewer neurological injuries and wound complications than patients without these psychiatric disorders. These findings highlight the necessity for additional studies to elucidate underlying reasons for these disparities.

Head and neck free flap reconstruction under the COVID-19 pandemic.

High perioperative mortality and complication rates during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been reported. In head and neck reconstruction, not only is patient safety important, but the prevention of infection introduced by the surgical team is also important because the procedure is performed in close proximity to the upper respiratory tract. In addition, recent studies have reported an increased risk for thrombus formation after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19 vaccination, which is problematic for microsurgical reconstruction procedures. At the authors' institution, patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction are requested to stay home for 2 weeks and undergo screening tests for COVID-19 before admission. Surgeons use standard personal protective equipment during surgery. There was no significant difference in the rate of total flap necrosis between the COVID-19 and non-pandemic periods or large difference of perioperative complication rates between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients. No surgery-related infections among the surgical staff were also found.

Contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid stenosis: a comprehensive review.

This study aims to provide an overview on contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid artery stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify and categorize open surgery intervention techniques for the management of carotid artery stenosis, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of each technique. Five surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been described: CEA with primary closure, CEA with patch closure, CEA by eversion technique, CEA by modified eversion technique and CEA by partial eversion. Evidence has reported significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after CEA with primary closure, including 30-days stroke rate and late restenosis. Although more recent techniques have been reported to provide superior outcomes, electing the best surgical technique is still a matter of debate. Also, CEA using a mini-skin incision has been associated to lower risk of cranial/cervical nerve injury and shorter length of hospital stay. The selection of the surgical intervention should be tailored and have into consideration individual patient characteristics, clinical considerations, surgeon preference and surgical team expertise. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to support more robust decisions on the choice of contemporary open surgical approaches to manage carotid stenosis.

Clinical features and prediction of long-term survival after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

The treatment of perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) poses specific challenges not only due to its high perioperative complication rates but also due its dismal long-term prognosis with only a few long-term survivors (LTS) among the patients. Therefore, in this analysis characteristics and predictors of LTS in pCCA patients are investigated. In this single center analysis, patients undergoing curative-intent liver resection for pCCA between 2010 and 2022 were categorized into long-term and short-term survivors (STS) excluding perioperative mortality. Binary logistic regression was used to determine key differences between the groups and to develop a prognostic composite variable. This composite variable was subsequently tested in the whole cohort of surgically treated pCCA patients using Cox Regression analysis for cancer-specific survival (CSS). Within a cohort of 209 individuals, 27 patients were identified as LTS (median CSS = 125 months) and 55 patients as STS (median CSS = 16 months). Multivariable analysis identified preoperative portal vein infiltration (OR = 5.85, p = 0.018) and intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions (OR = 10.29, p = 0.002) as key differences between the groups. A prognostic composite variable based on these two features was created and transferred into a Cox regression model of the whole cohort. Here, the composite variable (HR = 0.35, p<0.001), lymph node metastases (HR = 2.15, p = 0.001) and postoperative complications (HR = 3.06, p<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of CSS. Long-term survival after surgery for pCCA is possible and is strongly negatively associated with preoperative portal vein infiltration and intraoperative PRBC transfusion. As these variables are part of preoperative staging or can be modulated by intraoperative technique, the proposed prognostic composite variable can easily be transferred into clinical management to predict the oncological outcome of patients undergoing surgery for pCCA.

Outcome of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Relation to the Surgeon's Experience: Propensity Score Matching.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) presents a challenging learning curve, and the correlation between surgeon experience and clinical outcomes remains contentious. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of PELD performed by a single surgeon at beginner and experienced stages. Propensity score matching selected 150 patients (75 per group) with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes, perioperative complications, and adverse events were assessed. Baseline characteristics, pain improvement, patient satisfaction, and radiological outcomes did not differ between the groups. However, operation time was longer in the beginner group than in the experienced group (57.5 min [IQR, 50.0-70.0] versus 50.0 min [IQR, 45.0-55.0], p < 0.001). The beginner group had higher perioperative complication rates (eight patients [10.7%] versus one patient [1.3%], with a hazard ratio of 8.836 [95% CI, 1.077-72.514], p = 0.034) and lower 3-year survival without adverse events (19 patients [25.3%] in the beginner group and 10 patients [13.3%] in the experienced group, p = 0.045). Our findings indicate that the clinical outcomes were more favorable in patients operated on at the experienced stage compared to those treated at the beginner stage.

Complications of obliterative versus reconstructive vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in octogenarians: A retrospective cohort study.

Women of advanced age may choose between restorative or obliterative surgery for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse. Obliterative surgery is traditionally reserved for a subset of older women with more severe medical comorbidities, since obliterative approaches are generally considered to be less morbid and older individuals have higher rates of perioperative complications than younger cohorts. This study compared perioperative complications amongst octogenarians undergoing obliterative versus reconstructive approaches. This data will help to inform perioperative counselling as previous studies have not been powered to evaluate complications in this population. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients that had Pelvic organ prolapse surgery between 2012 and 2021, aged 80 years or older. Single-compartment procedures, vaginal mesh procedures, and oncologic surgery were excluded. The primary outcome was any complication within the first 30 days excluding urinary tract infection (UTI). UTI, readmission, and severe complications were secondary outcomes. Of the 4149 patients identified, 2514 (60.6%) underwent reconstructive surgery and 1635 (39.4%) underwent obliterative surgery. Patients undergoing reconstructive surgery were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 1 or 2 (46.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.002) and were less likely to be on antihypertensive medication (72.0% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.006). Further, there was an increased length of stay (1.47 ± 1.84 vs. 1.03 ± 1.31 days, p < 0.001) in hospital for reconstructive surgery which was more often performed as an inpatient (45.7% vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the primary outcome: any complication excluding UTIs. However, UTI was more common in the reconstructive group (aOR 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.0). The rate of serious complications (Clavien-Dindo Class IV) was low overall and not different between reconstructive and obliterative approaches (1.3% vs. 1.0%, respectively). Both vaginal reconstructive and obliterative approaches have low complication rates in octogenarians, with only UTIrate being different between cohorts. When choosing surgical approach, we suggest a case-based, patient center discussion on the anatomic outcomes, durability and patient satisfaction.

Is There Utility in Preoperative Testing of Hemoglobin Before Primary Cheiloplasty?

To examine whether a preoperative hemoglobin of less than 10 g/dL is associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications. Retrospective review. Tertiary academic hospital at Arkansas Children's Hospital of Little Rock, Arkansas. A retrospective chart review evaluated patients undergoing primary cleft lip surgery from 2012 to 2017. No prospective intervention was performed for this study care. Age, sex, medical history, weight, and perioperative complications. Hemoglobin level was collected in the preoperative area. The primary outcome was rate of perioperative complications including infection, dehiscence, return to the operating room, unplanned admission, and emergency department visit within two weeks postoperatively. 105 patients undergoing primary cheiloplasty met inclusion criteria. Hemoglobin levels were obtained on all patients. 93.3% (n = 98) of patients had a hemoglobin of >10 g/dL before surgery, and 6.6% (n = 7) had levels <10 g/dL. 1 of 7 patients with a hemoglobin of <10 g/dL experienced a postoperative complication (Tet spell) and one patient with a hemoglobin of >10 g/dL experienced a postoperative complication (unplanned intensive care admission for respiratory distress). Post-operative complications are rare after primary cheiloplasty in patients with low or normal hemoglobin levels. The results of this study show that a preoperative hemoglobin of <10 g/dL does not predict perioperative complications in patients undergoing primary cheiloplasty.

Impacts of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radical Cystectomy: A Single High-Volume Center Experience.

(1) Background: Less than 30% of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and reasons for underuse remain unclear. One potential explanation is the concern for the increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of NAC on the risk of detrimental perioperative outcomes in patients with MIBC treated with radical cystectomy (RC). (2) Methods: We identified patients receiving RC for MIBC (T2-4a N0 M0) from 2016 to 2022. Moreover, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was applied between RC alone versus RC plus NAC, and our analysis tested the association between NAC status and peri-operative outcomes. (3) Results: Among the 317 patients treated with RC for identified MIBC, 98 (31%) received NAC. Patients treated with NAC were younger (median yr. 64 vs. 71; p < 0.001), with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (3 vs. 4; p > 0.001), and received more frequently continent urinary diversion (61 vs. 32%, p < 0.001). About 43% of patients in each group were treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD). After PSM, no differences were detected for the outcomes considered. (4) Conclusions: NAC is not associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications, including patients who received RARC with ICUD.

Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality.

Data on perioperative outcomes of emergent versus elective resection in esophageal cancer patients requiring esophagectomy are lacking. We investigated whether emergent resection was associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Data on patients with esophageal malignancy who underwent esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Thirty-day complication and mortality rates were compared between emergent esophagectomy (EE) and non-emergent esophagectomy. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with complications and mortality. Of 10,067 patients with malignancy who underwent esophagectomy, 181 (1.8%) had EE, 64% had preoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, or septic shock, and 44% had bleeding requiring transfusion. The EE group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and functional dependency. More transhiatal esophagectomies and diversions were performed in the EE group. After EE, the rates of 30-day mortality (6.1% vs. 2.8%), overall complications (65.2% vs. 44.2%), bleeding, pneumonia, prolonged intubation, and positive margin (17.7% vs. 7.4%) were higher, while that of anastomotic leak was similar. On adjusted logistic regression, older age, lower albumin, higher ASA class, and fragility were associated with increased complications and mortality. McKeown esophagectomy and esophageal diversion were associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. EE was associated with 30-day postoperative complications (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.43; p<0.0001). EE was associated with a more than 2-fold increase in complications compared to elective procedures, but no independent increase in short-term mortality. These findings may help guide data-driven critical decision-making for surgery in select cases of complicated esophageal malignancy.

Advancing geriatric surgical outcomes in elective ventral and incisional hernia repair surgeries: An American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program study

IntroductionIncreasing age is known to be associated with increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality, however, the goal of this study was to determine if an increase in age correlates to differences in surgical outcomes for elective ventral hernia repair. MethodsRetrospective cohort study using American College of Surgeons NSQIP database from 2016 to 2020. Included diagnosis codes were laparoscopic or open incisional or ventral hernia repairs, categorized into three age groups: 18-64y, 65-74y, and ≥75y. Thirty-day perioperative outcomes analyzed using bivariate χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression. ResultsWe identified 116,643 people who had elective ventral or incisional hernia repair. Compared to 18-64y and 65-74y age groups, patients ≥75y were significantly more likely to develop any post-operative complication, be re-admitted post-operatively for any reason, have an extended hospital stay, and require a reoperation. ConclusionsPatients ≥75y have significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after elective hernia repair compared to younger patients.

Examining the Applicability of Surgical Coaching Rules for Resident Autonomy in Non-teaching Hospitals.

This retrospective study aims to analyze the impact of standardized rules for teaching in university hospitals on surgical resident autonomy and patient safety, as measured by patient outcomes, and also examines the learning curves for residents and their impact on patient outcomes in a non-teaching hospital. The data for the study was collected retrospectively from medical records of 2000 adult patients who went through surgical procedures fromJanuary 2020 to December 2022. Participants were categorized into two groups based on the supervision level provided by attending surgeons and residents. Appropriate statistical methods were used to analyze the data. It was observed that operative times of cases handled by both attending and resident surgeons were less than those handled by residents alone. On the other hand, the former group had a significantly higher burden of comorbidities and higher rate of perioperative complications than the latter. These results have important implications for the training of medical residents and the overall delivery of healthcare services in university hospitals. The findings will also help towards better understanding of the effectiveness of these rules and their potential for improving the quality of care provided by residents in these settings.

Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study.

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.

Determining the need for a thoracoscopic approach to treat a giant hiatal hernia when abdominal access is poor.

Giant hernias present a significant challenge for digestive surgeons. The approach taken (laparoscopic vs thoracoscopic) depends largely on the preferences and skills of each surgeon, although in most cases today the laparoscopic approach is preferred. To determine whether patients presenting inadequate laparoscopic access to the intrathoracic hernial sac obtain poorer postoperative results than those with no such problem, in order to assess the need for a thoracoscopic approach. For the retrospective series of patients treated in our hospital for hiatal hernia (n = 112), we calculated the laparoscopic field of view and the working area accessible to surgical instruments, by means of preoperative imaging tests, to assess the likely outcome for cases inaccessible to laparoscopy. Patients with giant hiatal hernias for whom a preoperative calculation suggested that the laparoscopic route would not access all areas of the intrathoracic sac presented higher rates of perioperative complications and recurrence during follow-up than those for whom laparoscopy was unimpeded. The difference was statistically significant. Moreover, the insertion of mesh did not improve results for the non-accessible group. For patients with giant hiatal hernias, it is essential to conduct a preoperative evaluation of the angle of vision and the working area for surgery. When parts of the intrathoracic sac are inaccessible laparoscopically, the thoracoscopic approach should be considered.