California: The Pacific Connection David W. Lantis, Rodney Steiner, and Arthur E. Karinen. Chico: Creekside Press, 1989. Reviewed by Howard F. Gregor Professor, Department of Geography University of California, Davis, CA 95616 i\ BOOKPACKEDWITHSO MUCH information on the geography of California andinprintthrough a spanoffourprevious editions would seemtomakeunlikely stillfurthersignificantimprovement. Happily, the long-awaited fifth revision of this popular volume, with a new publisher and printer, proves wrong any such assumptions. Most immediately obvious is the improved physical appearance of the book. Higher-quality paper and more readable type especially stand out. Thetwo-typestyleusedinrecenteditionstodifferentiatedetailed facts from the introductory and more summary information has been replaced by the single larger style ofthe first edition (1963), but with detaileddatastillindented. Inkedimpressions arericher, andwiththe highly glossy paper surface make photographic and cartographic detail much more emphatic. Eleven new maps have been added and old maps have been updated. Although map formats remain the same, an interesting 143 144ASSOCIATION OF PACMC COAST GEOGRAPHERS addition is the inclusion of more regional-specific items, such as volcanoes in the map ofthe Southern Cascade and "high-rise office tower clusters" and "regional shopping malls" in the map representing the Southeast CoastalPlain (Orange County). A number ofnew photos have been added and some photos have been replaced. A pleasing addition, and in this regional geography volume a particularlyhelpfulaid ,istheindexinginthetableofcontents oftheprincipal subregions. In the same vein is the listing in the back ofthe book of allmaps, photos, and charts byboth chapterand individual sequence, although page numbers would have been even more helpful. Also updated, and enlarged by almost a third, is the highly valuable semiannotated bibliography, though at the cost of deleting many items predating 1970. The text also reads better, the result of a complete rewriting that nevertheless manages to preserve the format of the older book. Typos, however, are occasionally frequent enough to warrant closer editing in future editions. With text and illustration additions, this new edition comes to almost six hundred pages, more than a quarter larger than the previous printing. Text revision continues to emphasize the theme ofpast volumes, regionalvariety, butalsopays increased attentiontotheever-expanding urban populations and their accelerating ethnic diversity. Hint of this additional theme appears immediately in the book's subtitle, The Pacific Connection, by which is meant especially the considerable immigrationinpastdecades fromLatinAmericaandEastAsia. Most appropriately, this focus is sharpest in Southern California and Los Angeles, "America's new Ellis Island." To the four boom periods assigned Los Angeles in the older book has been added "the TransPacific Boom," taking place in the "Contemporary International Conurbation." The change oftheDowntown to a "bipolar-bilingual" area is described and many of the most important ethnic islands originating in recent years are noted, such as LittleAsia (Alhambra), Little Saigon (Bolsa Avenue, Westminster), and Koreatown (Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles). Ethnic regionalization in the Central CoastalPlainportionoftheLosAngelesBasinhasbecome somarked YEARBOOK · VOLUME 51 · 1989145 thateven someoftheregionalpatterns outlinedinthe olderbookhave been revised. The old subdivision ofTheMiddleBlock, with the cities of Downey and Norwalk, is now eliminated. In its place and now joining the Western Black Block of the older edition is the NorthCentral Hispanic Block; the precise delimitation of this expanding barrio zone is especially informative. Finally, the term Southeast Block (Vanished Dairy Belt) now becomes the Southeastern Anglo Block, reflecting not only the completed demise of dairying but the discouragement of an ethnic influx by considerably higher land prices. Sheerpopulation growth is given its due in more detailed descriptions of the local geography of urban centers and often in regional modifications as well. A good example is offered by the new subregional treatments ofMetropolitan San Diego, now the second largestcity in California. The wildfirepopulation growth in southern OrangeCounty, immediatelysouthofIrvine, isalsogivenrecognition withthedelimitationofanewregion (withmap),South County. Even more attention is given the advance ofpopulation eastward from Los Angeles into Riverside and San Bernardino counties and northward into the Antelope Valley. But here, despite the statement that the "southern edge ofthe [Mojave] Desert is becoming a continuation of the Southern California sprawl," the authors refrain from following theexampleofWhiteetal. (1985)inaddingthisterritory. Presumably the Transverse Ranges are taken to be a more "specific" regional delimiterthanthePeninsularRanges, thenorthern edge ofwhich is in the newly designated South County region. In the San Francisco Bay Area, the South Bay region (including San Jose, which recently...
Read full abstract