You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD45-02 UROLIFT VERSUS REZUM FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: A REAL-WORLD SINGLE-INSTITUTION ANALYSIS Chih Peng Chin, Evan Garden, Krishna Ravivarapu, Devki Shukla, Olamide Omidele, Micah Levy, Joseph Sewell Araya, Alexander Small, Steven Kaplan, Robert Valenzuela, Avinash Reddy, Susan Marshall, Jay Motola, Craig Nobert, Mantu Gupta, and Michael Palese Chih Peng ChinChih Peng Chin More articles by this author , Evan GardenEvan Garden More articles by this author , Krishna RavivarapuKrishna Ravivarapu More articles by this author , Devki ShuklaDevki Shukla More articles by this author , Olamide OmideleOlamide Omidele More articles by this author , Micah LevyMicah Levy More articles by this author , Joseph Sewell ArayaJoseph Sewell Araya More articles by this author , Alexander SmallAlexander Small More articles by this author , Steven KaplanSteven Kaplan More articles by this author , Robert ValenzuelaRobert Valenzuela More articles by this author , Avinash ReddyAvinash Reddy More articles by this author , Susan MarshallSusan Marshall More articles by this author , Jay MotolaJay Motola More articles by this author , Craig NobertCraig Nobert More articles by this author , Mantu GuptaMantu Gupta More articles by this author , and Michael PaleseMichael Palese More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002613.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: UroLift and Rezum are newer minimally invasive BPH treatment options that have grown in popularity. Research directly comparing the two is limited. We report the largest cohort to date comparing real world clinical outcomes following UroLift and Rezum. METHODS: Patients at an academic institution between 1/2017 and 1/2021 were screened, and those with preoperative prostate volume >30cc and ≤80cc were included. Patients with follow-up <30 days were excluded. Outcomes included changes in AUA symptom score (AUA-SS), Qmax, post void residual (PVR), surgical retreatment rate, changes in BPH medications use, postoperative complications, ER visits, and readmissions within 90 days. RESULTS: We identified 375 Rezum and 151 UroLift patients of which 191 Rezum (51%) and 88 UroLift (58%) patients met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up for Rezum and UroLift patients was 173 and 307 days, respectively. Compared to Rezum patients, UroLift patients were older (Rezum 67 ± 8 vs UroLift 69 ± 9 years, p=0.014) and had smaller prostates (Rezum 50.7 ± 13.5 vs UroLift 44.9 ± 12.4 cc, p<0.001). Preoperatively, UroLift patients had higher PVR (Rezum 93 ± 112 vs Urolift 156 ± 185 mL, p=0.028) and lower Qmax (Rezum 9.3 ± 5.1 vs UroLift 7.5 ± 4.6 mL/sec, p=0.004). After treatment, both Rezum and UroLift patients had significant, similar improvements in AUA-SS (Rezum -4.0 ± 6.8 vs. UroLift -5.2 ± 8.0 points, p=0.349) and PVR (Rezum -26.5 ± 91.8 vs UroLift -59.3 ± 150.3 mL, p=0.349). There was no significant improvement in Qmax (Table 1a). Both groups had decreased alpha-blocker use after treatment (Rezum 72.8% to 44.5%, UroLift 76.1% to 38.6%, both p<0.001) (Table 1b). In the postoperative 90-day period, Rezum patients experienced more hematuria, dysuria and retention, whereas UroLift patients more frequently had clot retention (Table 1c). There were no differences in 90-day ER visits, 90-day readmissions, or surgical retreatment rates (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with BPH, UroLift and Rezum are similarly effective in improving urinary symptoms and function with no difference in surgical retreatment rates. The procedures differed in short-term clinical side-effect profile. Rezum patients reported more urinary retention, hematuria, and dysuria; UroLift patients had clot retention more frequently. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e782 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Chih Peng Chin More articles by this author Evan Garden More articles by this author Krishna Ravivarapu More articles by this author Devki Shukla More articles by this author Olamide Omidele More articles by this author Micah Levy More articles by this author Joseph Sewell Araya More articles by this author Alexander Small More articles by this author Steven Kaplan More articles by this author Robert Valenzuela More articles by this author Avinash Reddy More articles by this author Susan Marshall More articles by this author Jay Motola More articles by this author Craig Nobert More articles by this author Mantu Gupta More articles by this author Michael Palese More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract