High-pitch CT Angiography Research Articles

Prospective ECG-gated High-Pitch Photon-Counting CT Angiography: Evaluation of measurement accuracy for aortic annulus sizing in TAVR planning

PurposeIn planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), retrospective cardiac spiral-CT is recommended to measure aortic annulus with subsequent CT-angiography (CTA) to evaluate access routes. Photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT enables to assess the aortic annulus in desired cardiac phases, using prospective ECG-gated high-pitch CTA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement accuracy of aortic annulus using prospective ECG-gated high-pitch CTA against retrospective spiral-CT reference. MethodThirty patients underwent cardiac spiral-CT and prospective ECG-gated (30% R-R on aortic valve level) high-pitch CTA. Using propensity score matching, another 30 patients were identified whose CTA was performed using high-pitch mode without ECG-synchronization. Two investigators measured annular diameter, perimeter, and area on cardiac spiral-CT and high-pitch CTA. ResultsThe aortic valve was imaged in systole in 90 % of prospective ECG-gated CTA cases but only 50 % of non-ECG-gated CTA cases (p = 0.002). There was a strong correlation (r ≥ 0.94) without significant differences (p ≥ 0.09) between cardiac spiral-CT and prospective ECG-gated high-pitch CTA for all annulus measurements. In contrast, significant differences were found in annular short-axis diameter and area between cardiac spiral-CT and non-ECG-gated high-pitch CTA (p ≤ 0.03). Furthermore, prospective ECG-gated high-pitch CTA showed significantly reduced radiation exposure compared with cardiac spiral-CT (CTDI 4.52 vs. 24.10 mGy; p < 0.001). ConclusionPCD-CT-based prospective ECG-gated high-pitch scans with targeted systolic acquisition at the level of the aortic valve can simultaneously visualize TAVR access routes and accurately measure systolic annulus size. This approach could aid in optimizing protocols to achieve lower radiation doses in the growing population of younger, low-risk TAVR patients.

Highly accelerated, Dixon-based non-contrast MR angiography versus high-pitch CT angiography

ObjectivesTo compare a novel, non-contrast, flow-independent, 3D isotropic magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence that combines respiration compensation, electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering, undersampling, and Dixon water-fat separation with an ECG-triggered aortic high-pitch computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the aorta.Materials and methodsTwenty-five patients with recent CTA were scheduled for non-contrast MRA on a 3 T MRI. Aortic diameters and cross-sectional areas were measured on MRA and CTA using semiautomatic measurement tools at 11 aortic levels. Image quality was assessed independently by two radiologists on predefined aortic levels, including myocardium, proximal aortic branches, pulmonary veins and arteries, and the inferior (IVC) and superior vena cava (SVC). Image quality was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale.ResultsAll datasets showed diagnostic image quality. Visual grading was similar for MRA and CTA regarding overall image quality (0.71), systemic arterial image quality (p = 0.07–0.91) and pulmonary artery image quality (p = 0.05). Both readers favored MRA for SVC and IVC, while CTA was preferred for pulmonary veins (all p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in aortic diameters or cross-sectional areas between native MRA and contrast-enhanced CTA (p = 0.08–0.94).ConclusionThe proposed non-contrast MRA enables robust imaging of the aorta, its proximal branches and the pulmonary arteries and great veins with image quality and aortic diameters and cross-sectional areas comparable to that of CTA. Moreover, this technique represents a suitable free-breathing alternative, without the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation. Therefore, it is especially suitable for patients requiring repetitive imaging.

Non-ECG-gated high-pitch CT angiography versus hybrid ECG-gated CT angiography for aorta using 512-slice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

There have been few reports comparing image quality and radiation dose of aorta computed tomography angiography (CTA) between the high-pitch and the hybrid technique. To compare the image quality and radiation dose among non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch CTA and hybrid ECG-gated CTA of the aorta using 512-slice CT. This retrospective study included 110 patients who underwent non-ECG-gated high-pitch CTA (group 1) or hybrid ECG-gated CTA (group 2) of the entire aorta. Interpretability, image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the mean effective radiation dose were compared. The mean image noise of the whole aorta was significantly lower (15.7 ± 1.8 HU vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 HU, P = 0.008) in group 1 than in group 2. The CNR (22.3 ± 4.7 vs. 20.0 ± 3.9, P < 0.001) and SNR (26.5 ± 4.9 vs. 23.2 ± 4.0, P < 0.001) were higher in group 2 compared with group 1. Neither group showed a significant difference in interpretability of the ascending aorta, cardiac chamber, aortic valve, right ostium, and left ostium (all P = 1). The mean effective radiation dose was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (3.5 ± 0.9 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 mSv, P < 0.001). The non-ECG-gated high-pitch technique shows significantly improved CNR and SNR due to reduced noise with lower radiation exposure. The interpretability of the cardiac structure, ascending aorta, aortic valve, and both ostia did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Coronary artery bypass grafting and perioperative stroke: imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in the ascending aorta with ungated high-pitch CT-angiography

Perioperative stroke is a devastating complication after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, with atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta as important risk factor. During surgical manipulation, detachment of plaques can lead to consecutive embolization into brain-supplying arteries. High-pitch computed tomography angiography (HP-CTA) represents a non-invasive imaging modality, which provides the opportunity for comprehensive imaging of the ascending aorta, including plaque detection and advanced characterization. In our present retrospective study on 719 individuals, who had undergone HP-CTA within 6 months prior to CABG, atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta was evaluated with respect to perioperative stroke rates. For image analysis, the ascending aorta was divided into a proximal and distal part, consisting of four segments, and evaluated for presence and distribution of calcified and mixed plaques. All patients with perioperative stroke presented with atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta. The stroke rate was significantly associated with the presence and extent of atherosclerotic disease. Patients burdened with mixed plaques presented with significantly higher perioperative stroke rates. This study demonstrates that HP-CTA allows accurate evaluation of plaque extent and composition in the ascending aorta, and therefore may improve risk stratification of stroke prior to CABG.

Retrospectively ECG-gated helical vs. non-ECG-synchronized high-pitch CTA of the aortic root for TAVI planning.

BackgroundMultidetector computed tomography (MDCT) plays a key role in patient assessment prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, to date no consensus has been established on what is the optimal pre-procedural imaging protocol. Variability in pre-TAVI acquisition protocols may lead to discrepancies in aortic annulus measurements and may potentially influence prosthesis size selection.PurposeThe current study evaluates the magnitude of differences in aortic annulus measurements using max-systolic, end-diastolic, and non-ECG-synchronized imaging, as well as the impact of method on prosthesis size selection.Material and methodsFifty consecutive TAVI-candidates, who underwent retrospectively-ECG-gated CT angiography (CTA) of the aortic root, directly followed by non-ECG-synchronized high-pitch CT of the entire aorta, were retrospectively included. Aortic root dimensions were assessed at each 10% increment of the R-R interval (0–100%) and on the non-ECG-synchronized scan. Dimensional changes within the cardiac cycle were evaluated using a 1-way repeated ANOVA. Agreement in measurements between max-systole, end-diastole and non-ECG-synchronized scans was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsMaximal dimensions of the aortic root structures and minimum annulus-coronary ostia distances were measured during systole. Max-systolic measurements were significantly and substantially larger than end-diastolic (p<0.001) and non-ECG-synchronized measurements (p<0.001). Due to these discrepancies, the three methods resulted in the same prosthesis size selection in only 48–62% of patients.ConclusionsThe systematic differences between max-systolic, end-diastolic and non-ECG-synchronized measurements for relevant aortic annular dimensions are both statistically significant and clinically relevant. Imaging strategy impacts prosthesis size selection in nearly half the TAVI-candidates. End-diastolic and non-ECG-synchronized imaging does not provide optimal information for prosthesis size selection. Systolic image acquisition is necessary for assessment of maximal annular dimensions and minimum annulus-coronary ostia distances.

High-pitch non-gated scans on the second and third generation dual-source CT scanners: comparison of coronary image quality

ObjectiveTo examine differences in image quality of the coronary arteries when performing high-pitch non-electrocardiography (ECG)-gated scans on the second-generation (2G) and third-generation (3G) dual-source CT scanners. MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients with high-pitch non-ECG-gated CT angiography (CTA) of the chest or chest/abdomen/pelvis. Outpatient scans from 59 patients in the 3G high-pitch group and 53 patients in the 2G high-pitch group were included. Two blinded cardiac imagers independently scored the coronary image quality using a 4-point Likert scale (from completely diagnostic to completely non-diagnostic) and evaluated the presence of coronary artery disease. ResultsDiagnostic image quality of the coronaries in high-pitch CTA exams using 3G scanner was improved compared to 2G scanner, both on a per-vessel basis (45–94% versus 23–86%) and on a per-study basis (34% versus 14%). The 3G group showed a statistically significant improvement in image quality when evaluating the left main coronary, right coronary, and overall coronary arteries. Coronary artery disease was detected in 65% of high-pitch scans. Radiation doses in terms of CTDIvol and DLP were lower for 3G high-pitch scans (7.5 mGy and 491 mGy∗cm) compared to 2G high-pitch scans (14.8 mGy and 911 mGy∗cm). ConclusionsWe found a higher proportion of diagnostic image quality of the coronary arteries in high-pitch non-ECG-gated CTA exams using a 3G dual-source CT scanner, compared to 2G. In scans with diagnostic image quality, underlying coronary artery disease may be confidently diagnosed and should prompt considerations for further management in the appropriate clinical setting.

Cardiac CT in the Preoperative Diagnostics of Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Radiation Dose Optimization by Omitting Test Bolus or Bolus Tracking

Congenital heart diseases (CHD) belong to the leading causes of infant mortality worldwide. Prognostic improvements result from multimodal therapy strategies leading to an increased demand for noninvasive imaging. The aim of the study was to further optimize cardiac CT radiation dose by omitting the test bolus or bolus tracking scan, which can have a relevant share of radiation exposure, especially in neonates. This retrospective study included 25 neonates with CHD who received a CT angiography (CTA) from 2009 to 2018. The examinations were performed as a high-pitch CTA (pitch 3.4, 80 kV) with manual contrast administration (1.5 ml/kg body weight) and fixed scan delay depending on the respective heart defect. Diagnosis, adverse events, radiation dose parameters, objective (contrast-to-noise ratio) and subjective (4-point Likert scale) image quality as well as diagnostic accuracy compared to intraoperative findings was assessed. All examinations were diagnostically evaluable without adverse events. The median CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) was 0.50 mGy (range, 0.15-0.94), the median dose-length product was 8 mGy × cm (range, 3-17). The estimation of the effective dose by Monte Carlo simulation revealed lower median dose levels 0.66 mSv (range, 0.25-1.40 mSv) than previously published in comparable groups. All examinations achieved a very good mean image quality score of 1.2 ± 0.4 with only minimal image noise and mean contrast-to-noise ratio of 16.1 ± 7.0. Diagnostic accuracy was 100 % as cardiac anatomy revealed no new diagnoses or significant differences in the subsequent cardiac surgery. Cardiac high-pitch CTA of neonates with CHD can be performed safely and dose-reducing without additional test bolus or bolus tracking scan. With very good image quality, it provides a detailed insight into the cardiac anatomy and thus enables a differentiated, noninvasive therapy planning.

Advanced CT acquisition protocol with a third-generation dual-source CT scanner and iterative reconstruction technique for comprehensive prosthetic heart valve assessment

ObjectivesMultidetector CT (MDCT) is a valuable tool for functional prosthetic heart valve (PHV) assessment. However, radiation exposure remains a concern. We assessed a novel CT-acquisition protocol for comprehensive PHV evaluation at limited dose.MethodsPatients with a PHV were scanned using a third-generation dual-source CT scanner (DSCT) and iterative reconstruction technique (IR). Three acquisitions were obtained: a non-enhanced scan; a contrast-enhanced, ECG-triggered, arterial CT angiography (CTA) scan with reconstructions at each 5 % of the R-R interval; and a delayed high-pitch CTA of the entire chest. Image quality was scored on a five-point scale. Radiation dose was obtained from the reported CT dose index (CTDI) and dose length product (DLP).ResultsWe analysed 43 CT examinations. Mean image quality score was 4.1±1.4, 4.7±0.5 and 4.2±0.6 for the non-contrast-enhanced, arterial and delayed acquisitions, respectively, with a total mean image quality of 4.3±0.7. Mean image quality for leaflet motion was 3.9±1.4. Mean DLP was 28.2±17.1, 457.3±168.6 and 68.5±47.2 mGy.cm for the non-contrast-enhanced (n=40), arterial (n=43) and delayed acquisition (n=43), respectively. The mean total DLP was 569±208 mGy.cm and mean total radiation dose was 8.3±3.0 mSv (n=43).ConclusionComprehensive assessment of PHVs is possible using DSCT and IR at moderate radiation dose.Key points• Prosthetic heart valve dysfunction is a potentially life-threatening condition.• Dual-source CT can adequately assess valve leaflet motion and anatomy.• We assessed a comprehensive protocol with three acquisitions for PHV evaluation.• This protocol is associated with good image quality and limited dose.

Whole-Body High-Pitch CT Angiography: Strategies to Reduce Radiation Dose and Contrast Volume.

The purpose of this study was to assess the noninferiority of dual-source high-pitch CT angiography (CTA) performed with high-concentration (iopamidol 370) low-volume (60 mL) iodinated contrast material at low voltage (100 kVp) in comparison with dual-source high-pitch CTA with standard-of-care low-concentration (iopamidol 300) standard-volume (75 mL) iodinated contrast material at high voltage (120 kVp) to determine whether use of the high-concentration low-volume method would afford a reduction in radiation dose and contrast volume without negatively affecting vascular opacification. This study had three arms. A phantom was used to assess vascular contrast enhancement at different iodine and saline solution dilutions with iopamidol 300 or 370 to compare lower-iodination (iopamidol 300) high-voltage (120 kVp) high-pitch (120 kVp, 250 mAs) imaging with higher-iodination (iopamidol 370) low-voltage (100 kVp) high-pitch (100 kVp, 100-240 mAs) acquisition. Metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors were placed in an anthropomorphic phantom to extract organ-based radiation profiles, and ANOVA was performed. The study prospectively enrolled 150 patients: 50 patients received 75 mL iopamidol 300, and image acquisition was performed at 120 kVp and 250 mAs; 50 patients received 75 mL iopamidol 370, and acquisition was performed at 100 kVp and 240 mAs; and 50 patients received 60 mL iopamidol, and acquisition was performed at 370 at 100 kVp and 240 mAs. Vascular signal-to-noise ratio was evaluated at 18 anatomic locations. Longitudinal signal-to-noise ratio was used to assess homogeneity of contrast enhancement. Size-specific dose estimates were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA. Noninferiority of high-concentration (iopamidol 370) low-voltage (100 kVp) high-pitch acquisitions compared with low-concentration (iopamidol 300) high-voltage (120 kVp) high-pitch acquisition was achieved at 170 mAs in vitro. Radiation assessment showed significant decreases in radiation dose for the 100-kVp 240-mAs protocol (p < 0.0001). Noninferior vascular contrast (p > 0.280) and luminal homogeneity (p > 0.191) were found for all high-pitch protocols. Significantly decreased radiation dose was observed for the two groups that received 60 and 75 mL of iopamidol 370 at 100 kVp and 240 mAs (p < 0.0001). Dual-source high-pitch CTA with high-concentration (iopamidol 370) low-volume (60 mL) iodinated contrast medium and low-voltage acquisition (100 kVp) is noninferior to dual-source high-pitch CTA with low-concentration (iopamidol 300) standard-volume (75 mL) iodinated contrast material at high voltage (120 kVp) and affords simultaneous reduction in radiation dose and contrast volume without negatively affecting vascular contrast enhancement.

TCTAP A-009 The Pattern of Myocardial Perfusion Defects in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Detected by Non-gated High-pitch CT Angiography of Aorta at Emergency Department

We intended to investigate the pattern of myocardial perfusion defects (PDs) in cases of acute coronary syndrome visualized by non-gated high-pitch Contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients admitted to emergency department (ED) for suspected aortic dissection. From April

Is ECG triggering for motion artefact reduction in dual-source CT angiography of the ascending aorta still required with high-pitch scanning? The role of ECG-gating in high-pitch dual-source CT of the ascending aorta.

To compare electrocardiographic (ECG)-triggered high-pitch (HP) dual-source CT angiography (CTA) with non-ECG-triggered HP CTA of the aorta, particularly the ascending aorta, with regard to image quality, motion artefacts, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiation dose. 59 consecutive patients who had been referred for CTA for known or suspected aortic disease, previous aortic intervention or planned transapical or transfemoral aortic valve implantation were prospectively included. Patients underwent CTAs with HP, using a dual-source CTA system, with [control group (Group A); n = 30] or without (Group B; n = 29) ECG triggering after randomization. For evaluation, image quality and a motion artefact score (MAS) were assessed in a blinded fashion at different predefined anatomic regions. CNR and SNR were measured at the same levels. Radiation dose estimates and contrast enhancement were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences for image quality and MAS. The intra-arterial contrast resolution was significantly higher at the level of the aortic arch and descending aorta in the non-triggered group (CNR values, p = 0.002-0.018). No significant differences in the radiation dose were found. Non-triggered HP dual-source CTA provided comparable results with regard to image quality, MAS, CNR, SNR and radiation doses compared with ECG-triggered HP CTA. Therefore, ECG triggering of the ascending aorta might be obviated when HP scanning is available. HP dual-source CTA might obviate ECG triggering in the ascending aorta. Non-triggered HP CTA of the ascending aorta provides an excellent image quality.

Improved visual delineation of the intimal flap in Stanford type A and B dissections at 3rd generation dual-source high-pitch CT angiography.

Evaluation of the intimal flap visibility comparing 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source high-pitch CT. Twenty-five consecutive patients with aortic dissection underwent CT angiography on a second and third generation dual-source CT scanner using prospective ECG-gated high-pitch dual-source CT acquisition mode. Contrast material, saline flush and flow rate were kept equal for optimum comparability. The visibility of the intimal flap as well as the delineation of the different vascular structures was evaluated. In 3rd generation dual-source high-pitch CT we could show a significant improvement of intimal flap visibility in aortic dissection. Especially, the far end of the dissection membrane could be better evaluated in 3rd generation high-pitch CT, reaching statistical significance (P<0.01). 3rd Generation high-pitch CT angiography shows a better delineation of the aortic intimal flap in a small patient cohort, especially in the far ends of the dissection membrane. This might be due to higher tube power in this CT generation. However, to generalise these findings larger trials are needed.

Evaluation of a Reduced Contrast Media Protocol in Thoracoabdominal Aortic High Pitch CT-Angiography

Objectives: The aim is to evaluate contrast enhancement and density distribution in non-ECG-synchronized high-pitch aortoiliacal CT-angiography. Methods: 84 patients underwent clinically indicated thoracoabdominal CTA between February 2011 and May 2012 using high-pitch technique for arterial phase and an individually tailored contrast-media protocol depending on weight-class and scan duration. Standardized measurement of intravascular density is performed and accessed by multi plane reformations (MPR) orthogradly to vessels centerline. Results for 1.5 cm slices are statistically evaluated on per slice, per vessel segment ascending aortic, aortic arch, descending and abdominal aorta, right and left iliacal artery (common and external) and per patient level, regarding left-ventricular function and renal impairment. Results: In mean 53.1 ± 7.4 ml contrast-medium is administered for aortoiliacal examination. 4841 slices with mean density 280.0 ± 63 HU are analyzed. In 84.2% (n = 4074), diagnostic quality is delivered. Regarding vessel segments, mean enhancement scored ≥ 255.5 except weight-class 5. Adjusted to homogeneity of bolus by excluding examinations with failed bolus triggering (14%), weight-class 1 to 3 provides 100% to 75% entirely diagnostic datasets, where amount is inadequate in weight-classes 4 (62%) and 5 (2%). Conclusions: CM protocol produces moderate but diagnostic vessel enhancement with little CM (mean = 50.7 ± 6 ml) in patients smaller than 86 kg (weight-class 1 to 3) independently to left ventricular or renal function. Failure rate requires precise bolus triggering.

Correction: Feasibility of Low-Dose Contrast Medium High Pitch CT Angiography for the Combined Evaluation of Coronary, Head and Neck arteries

Correction: Feasibility of Low-Dose Contrast Medium High Pitch CT Angiography for the Combined Evaluation of Coronary, Head and Neck arteries

High-pitch coronary CT angiography with third generation dual-source CT: limits of heart rate

To determine the average heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) required for diagnostic imaging of the coronary arteries in patients undergoing high-pitch CT-angiography (CTA) with third-generation dual-source CT. Fifty consecutive patients underwent CTA of the thoracic (n = 8) and thoracoabdominal (n = 42) aorta with third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT with prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gating at a pitch of 3.2. No β-blockers were administered. Motion artifacts of coronary arteries were graded on a 4-point scale. Average HR and HRV were noted. The average HR was 66 ± 11 beats per minute (bpm) (range 45-96 bpm); the HRV was 7.3 ± 4.4 bpm (range 3-20 bpm). Interobserver agreement on grade of image quality for the 642 coronary segments evaluated by both observers was good (κ = 0.71). Diagnostic image quality was found for 608 of the 642 segments (95%) in 43 of 50 patients (86%). In 14% of the patients, image quality was nondiagnostic for at least one segment. HR (p = 0.001) was significantly higher in patients with at least one non-diagnostic segment compared to those without. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in HRV between patients with nondiagnostic segments and those with diagnostic images of all segments. All patients with a HR < 70 bpm had diagnostic image quality in all coronary segments. The effective radiation dose and scan time for the heart were 0.4 ± 0.1 mSv and 0.17 ± 0.02 s, respectively. Third-generation dual-source 192-slice CT allows for coronary angiography in the prospectively ECG-gated high-pitch mode with diagnostic image quality at HR up to 70 bpm. HRV is not significantly related to image quality of coronary CTA.

Feasibility of Low-Dose Contrast Medium High Pitch CT Angiography for the Combined Evaluation of Coronary, Head and Neck Arteries

PurposeTo evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of combined heart, head, and neck CT angiography (CTA) using prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral scan protocol, compared with single coronary CTA.Materials and Methods151 consecutive patients were prospectively included and randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 47) underwent combined heart, neck, and head CTA using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral (Flash) scan protocol with a single-phase intravenous injection of iodinated contrast and saline flush; Group 2 (n = 51) underwent single coronary CTA with Flash scan protocol; and Group 3 (n = 53) underwent single coronary CTA with prospective sequence scan protocol. All patients were examined on a dual source CT (Definition FLASH). The image quality was determined for each CT study.ResultsPatients of scanning protocol Group 1, 2, and 3 showed no significant differences in age, sex, heart rates, and BMI. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality showed comparable results in the three scanning protocol groups on a per patient-based analysis. In group 1, image quality was found to be sufficient to be diagnostic in all arterial segments of carotid arteries. The mean dose-length product (DLP) for group 1 was 256.3±24.5 mGy×cm and was significantly higher in comparison with group 2 (93.4±19.9 mGy×cm; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference of DLP between group 1 and group 3 (254.1±69.9 mGy×cm).ConclusionsThe combined heart, neck, and head arteries scan using prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral scan protocol in 1 single examination resulted in an excellent opacification of the aorta, the carotid arteries, and the coronary arteries and provided a good image quality with low radiation dose.

Lowering Radiation Exposure in CT Angiography Using Automated Tube Potential Selection and Optimized Iodine Delivery Rate

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a radiation dose reduction strategy for CT angiography by the combination of higher iodine delivery rate and automated tube potential selection with adjusted reference values for tube current-exposure time product, as well as to measure the impact of this approach on image quality. One hundred consecutive patients underwent high-pitch CT angiography of the thorax and abdomen using either 90 mL of iomeprol 300 (n = 44, protocol A) or 90 mL of iomeprol 400 (n = 56, protocol B) at the same flow rate. Automated tube potential selection was used with reference tube current-time products of 330 mAs and 250 mAs for protocols A and B, respectively. Twenty vascular segments were analyzed for attenuation and image noise by two readers. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for all segments. The dose-length product (DLP) was documented to calculate effective dose and was compared between protocols both globally and for body mass index (BMI) subgroups. There were no differences in sex, height, weight, or BMI between both groups. Images from patients scanned with protocol B showed higher levels of image noise but also higher signal in all vascular segments. As a result, there were no differences in SNR between both groups. Conversely, CNR was significantly higher for almost all vascular segments in the group scanned using protocol B. Furthermore, DLP was significantly lower when protocol B was used, particularly in patients with a BMI of less than 30. In CT angiography, a combination of higher iodine delivery rate and automated tube potential selection with adjusted reference values for the tube current-time product allows reductions in radiation dose by approximately 30% without compromising image quality.

Bolus timing in high-pitch CT angiography of the aorta

ObjectiveTo investigate the bolus geometry in high-pitch CT angiography (CTA) of the aorta without ECG synchronisation in comparison to single-source CT. MethodsOverall 160 consecutive patients underwent CTA either in conventional single-source mode with a pitch of 1.2 (group 1), or in dual-source mode with a pitch of 3.0 (groups 2, 3 and 4) using different contrast media timings with bolus triggering at 140HU (5s, group 1; 10s, group 2; 12s, group 3; 14s, group 4). Contrast material, saline flush, flow rate and kV/mAs settings were kept equal for optimum comparability. Aortic attenuation was measured along the z-axis of the patient at different anatomic landmarks and subjective image quality was compared. ResultsThe most homogeneous enhancement of the aorta was reached with a delay of 10s after reaching the trigger threshold. The imaging length was not significantly different, but the examination time was significantly (p<0.001) shorter in the high-pitch group (7.7s vs. 1.7s for group 1 vs. 2, 3 and 4). ConclusionIn high-pitch CT angiography using a start delay of 10s after a trigger threshold of 140HU in the descending aorta is reached, a homogenous contrast along the z-axis is accomplished.

High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of supra-aortic arteries: assessment of image quality and radiation dose

High-pitch CT angiography (CTA) is a recent innovation that allows significant shortening of scan time with volume coverage of 43 mm per second. The aim of our study was to assess this technique in CTA of the head and neck. CTA of supra-aortic arteries was performed in 50 patients using two acquisition protocols: conventional single-source 64-slice (pitch 1.2) and high-pitch dual-source 128-slice CT (pitch 3.2). Subjective and objective image quality of supra-aortic vessel ostia as well as intra- and extra-cranial segments was retrospectively assessed by blinded readers and radiation dose compared between the two protocols. Conventional and high-pitch CTA achieved comparable signal-to-noise ratios in arterial (54.3 ± 16.5 versus 57.3 ± 14.8; p = 0.50) and venous segments (15.8 ± 6.7 versus 18.9 ± 8.9; p = 0.21). High-pitch scanning was, however, associated with sharper delineation of vessel contours and image quality significantly improved at the level of supra-aortic vessel ostia (p < 0.0001) as well as along the brachiocephalic trunk (p < 0.0001), the subclavian arteries (p < 0.0001), proximal common carotid arteries (p = 0.01), and vertebral V1 segments (p < 0.0001). Using the high-pitch mode, the dose-length product was reduced by about 35% (218.2 ± 30 versus 141.8 ± 20 mGy × cm). Due to elimination of transmitted cardiac motion, high-pitch CTA of the neck improves image quality in the proximity of the aortic arch while significantly lowering radiation dose. The technique thus qualifies as a promising alternative to conventional spiral CTA and may be particularly useful for identification of ostial stenosis.

Radiation Dose and Image Quality at High-Pitch CT Angiography of the Aorta: Intraindividual and Interindividual Comparisons With Conventional CT Angiography

The objective of our study was to evaluate radiation dose and quantitative image quality parameters at high-pitch CT angiography (CTA) of the aorta compared with conventional CTA. We studied the examinations of 110 patients (65 men and 45 women; mean age ± SD, 64 ± 15 years) who had undergone CTA of the entire aorta on a second-generation dual-source CT system; 50 examinations were performed in high-pitch mode. The mean arterial attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) were calculated for the high-pitch CTA and conventional CTA groups. Radiation exposures were compared. All studies were considered of diagnostic quality. At high-pitch CTA, the mean tube voltage and tube current-exposure time product were 118 ± 7 kV (SD) and 197 ± 78 mAs compared with 120 ± 1 kV and 258 ± 78 mAs, respectively, at conventional CTA (p < 0.05). The mean volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose were 8.1 ± 2.4 mGy, 561.1 ± 178.6 mGy × cm, and 9.6 ± 3.0 mSv at high-pitch CTA and 18.3 ± 7.7 mGy, 1162.6 ± 480.1 mGy × cm, and 19.8 ± 8.2 mSv at conventional CTA (p < 0.001). Attenuation was similar for both protocols, whereas significantly less contrast medium was injected for high-pitch CTA than for standard-pitch CTA (87.3 ± 16 mL vs 97.9 ± 16 mL, respectively; p < 0.01). The SNR and CNR were significantly lower in the high-pitch CTA examinations (p < 0.01), whereas the FOM was nonsignificantly higher. Twenty patients underwent both high-pitch CTA and conventional CTA, with a 45% reduction in radiation dose (p < 0.001). High-pitch CTA of the aorta yields 45-50% reduction of radiation exposure as well as contrast medium savings with maintained vessel attenuation.