High On-treatment Residual Platelet Reactivity Research Articles

Impact of Diabetes on Platelet Function in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Taking Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Objectives: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke and associated with platelet reactivity. We aim to evaluate the effect of DM on platelet function in acute ischemic stroke patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).Methods: We consecutively included patients with acute ischemic stroke taking DAPT. Platelet function was assessed by thromboelastography and the arachidonic acid (AA) or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) induced platelet inhibition rate were used to confirmed the high-residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) to aspirin or clopidogrel. We classified patients into DM and non-DM groups. The association between DM and platelet function was assessed and the confounding factors were adjusted by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The independent risk factors of HRPR were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results: A total of 1,071 acute ischemic stroke patients, 712 in the non-DM group and 359 in the DM group, were included. Patients with DM had a significantly higher maximum amplitude (63.0 vs. 62.0 mm, P < 0.01), ADP-induced clot strength (34.6 vs. 30.3 mm, P < 0.01) and clopidogrel HRPR rate (22.6% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.038) than those without DM. Among 662 patients after PSM, the maximum amplitude (63.1 vs. 62.5 mm, P = 0.032), ADP-induced clot strength (34.6 vs. 29.3 mm, P < 0.01) and clopidogrel HRPR rate (23.0% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.018) is still higher in the DM group. DM was an independent factor of clopidogrel HRPR (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.03–2.07, P < 0.05).Conclusions: In acute ischemic stroke patients taking DAPT, DM is associated with increased platelet reactivity and higher prevalence of clopidogrel HRPR.

Triglyceride glucose index influences platelet reactivity in acute ischemic stroke patients

AimInsulin resistance was reported to increase the risk of ischemic stroke, which can be assessed by the triglyceride glucose (TyG) index. However, it remains unclear whether the TyG index influences the platelet reactivity during the treatment of ischemic patients.MethodsIschemic stroke patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within 48 h onset were consecutively included. The TyG index was calculated as ln (fasting triglyceride [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/dL]/2). The top quartile of TyG index was defined as insulin resistance. The platelet reactivity was assessed by thromboelastography. The platelet inhibition rate induced by arachidonic acid (AA) or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was used to confirm the high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) to aspirin or clopidogrel, respectively. The association between TyG index and platelet reactivity was assessed by Kruskal–Wallis test. The independent risk factors of HRPR were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsA total of 1002 patients were included and divided into 4 groups by quartiles of the TyG index (< 2.02; 2.02–2.27; 2.27–2.52; ≥2.52). The findings demonstrated that the maximum intensity of the clot increased, but the AA-induced platelet inhibition rate decreased, depending on the TyG index quartiles. No significant difference was found in the ADP-induced platelet inhibition rate among groups. The prevalence of aspirin HRPR increased depending on the TyG index quartile. Unlike the non-insulin resistance group, the insulin resistance group was independently associated with aspirin HRPR (OR = 1.689, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.51, P = 0.009).ConclusionsIn acute ischemic stroke patients taking DAPT, the elevation of the TyG index is associated with enhanced platelet reactivity and higher prevalence of aspirin HRPR. Insulin resistance assessed by the TyG index could be an independent risk factor for aspirin HRPR.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Implications for Platelet Reactivity?

BackgroundIn patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are preferred over angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). However, in a recent pilot study, treatment with ACE inhibitors was associated with increased platelet reactivity compared to ARBs. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with ACE inhibitors and ARBs on platelet aggregation in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.MethodsOn-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), SFLLRN, AYPGKF, and collagen was assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 197 ACS patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and either prasugrel or ticagrelor.ResultsOne hundred sixty-five (83.7%) patients were treated with ACE inhibitors, 32 (16.3%) with ARBs. On-treatment residual AA- and ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (both p < 0.05). Likewise, SFLLRN was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (p = 0.036) and there was a trend for higher AYPGKF- and collagen-inducible platelet reactivity (p = 0.053 and p = 0.082). The incidence of high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity AA was significantly higher in patients with ACE inhibitors (52 [31.5%] vs. 3 [9.4%] patients; p = 0.019).ConclusionACE inhibitors are associated with increased on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in ACS patients with potent DAPT. Further clinical trials are needed to elucidate the role of RAAS blockade with ACE inhibitors and ARBs in ACS patients treated according to current standards.

Impact of renin angiotensin system inhibitors on homocysteine levels and platelets reactivity in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy

Background and aimsDual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) represent the cornerstone in the treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), mainly after an acute ischemic event. However, high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR), is not infrequent despite optimal medical treatment. Homocysteine (Hcy) is a metabolite of methionine catabolism linked to atherothrombosis. Recently, a potential crosstalk between RAS and Hcy has been suggested, potentially favouring platelet aggregation and cardiovascular disease.Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of RASi on Hcy levels and platelet aggregation in patients on DAPT after PCI. Methods and resultsPatients undergoing PCI on DAPT with ASA plus an ADP-antagonist (clopidogrel, ticagrelor or prasugrel), were included. RASi comprised angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Aggregation tests were performed by Multiple Electrode Aggregometry. We included 1210 patients, of whom 862 (71.2%) were on treatment with RASi. Overall, DAPT composition was ASA+clopidogrel in 566 (46.8%) patients, ASA+ticagrelor in 428 (35.4%) and ASA+prasugrel in 216 (17.9%). Median values of Hcy were higher in RASi patients (p = 0.006), who displayed a higher percentage of Hcy above the median value (52.4% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.019, adjustedOR [95%CI] = 1.40 [1.04–1.88], p = 0.027). No differences in HRPR rate were found according to RASi use for ASPI test (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.88) and ADP test (25.6% vs. 24.3%,p = 0.62; adjustedOR [95%CI] = 1.23 [0.89–1.70], p = 0.220) and according to ADP-antagonist type. A direct linear relationship was observed between platelet reactivity and Hcy in both patients receiving RASi and untreated ones, with higher values of platelet aggregation being observed in patients with Hcy above the median, independently from RASi administration and DAPT strategy. ConclusionIn patients on DAPT after PCI, RASi treatment did not emerge as an independent predictor of HRPR. However, the levels of Hcy were significantly elevated in patients on RASi and related to higher values of platelet reactivity, independently from the DAPT strategy.

Residual platelet reactivity in low-dose aspirin-treated patients with class 1 obesity

BackgroundRecent data suggest a decreased clinical efficacy of low-dose aspirin in patients weighing ≥70 kg. We therefore investigated the impact of body weight and class 1 obesity on thromboxane generation and platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (AA) in 316 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy following angioplasty and stenting. MethodsPlatelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa in response to AA were determined by flow cytometry as sensitive markers of platelet activation. Urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (11-dehydro-TXB2) and serum TXB2 were measured by commercially-available immunoassays. On-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow aspirin assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA). ResultsClass 1 obesity was independently associated with increased platelet surface expression of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa, but not with urinary 11-dehydro-TXB2, serum TXB2, and on-treatment platelet aggregation by all assays. Of all measured parameters, only MEA showed a positive albeit very weak correlation with body weight (r = 0.13, p = 0.02). Furthermore, the results of all tests did not differ significantly between patients without and with a body weight ≥ 70 kg. After adjustment for age and diabetes by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the frequency of high-on treatment residual TXB2 generation and high on-treatment residual AA-inducible platelet reactivity (HRTG/HRPR) did not differ significantly between obese and non-obese patients. ConclusionClass 1 obesity is associated with enhanced platelet activation in response to AA in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. This seems to be independent of cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition and does not translate into HRTG/HRPR.

Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Since data on the agreement between light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in patients on the more potent P2Y12 inhibitors are missing so far, we investigated if the evaluation of the responsiveness to therapy by LTA can be replaced by MEA in 160 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 80 each). Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) were defined according to previous studies showing an association of HRPR with the occurrence of adverse ischemic outcomes. ADP- inducible platelet aggregation was 33% and 37% (P = 0.07) by LTA and 19 AU and 20 AU (P = 0.38) by MEA in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. AA- inducible platelet aggregation was 2% and 3% by LTA and 15 AU and 16 AU by MEA, (all P ≥ 0.3) in patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, respectively. By LTA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 5%/5% and in 4%/ 13% of patients receiving prasugrel- and ticagrelor, respectively. By MEA, HRPR ADP and HRPR AA were seen in 3%/ 25% and 0%/24% of prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients, respectively. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by MEA correlated significantly with LTA ADP in prasugrel-treated patients (r = 0.4, P < 0.001), but not in those receiving ticagrelor (r = 0.09, P = 0.45). AA-inducible platelet aggregation by LTA and MEA did not correlate in prasugrel- and ticagrelor-treated patients. Sensitivity/specificity of HRPR by MEA to detect HRPR by LTA were 25%/99% for MEA ADP and 100%/79% for MEA AA in prasugrel-treated patients, and 0%/100% for MEA ADP and 70%/83% for MEA AA in ticagrelor-treated patients. In conclusion, on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity by LTA and MEA shows a significant correlation in prasugrel- but not ticagrelor-treated patients. However, in both groups LTA and MEA revealed heterogeneous results regarding the classification of patients as responders or non-responders to P2Y12 inhibition.

Decreased Platelet Inhibition by Thienopyridines in Hyperuricemia

PurposeHyperuricemia carries an increased risk of atherothrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This may at least in part be due to inadequate P2Y12 inhibition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the potential association between hyperuricemia and decreased platelet inhibition by P2Y12 antagonists.MethodsLevels of uric acid as well as on-treatment residual platelet reactivity in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were assessed in 301 clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing elective angioplasty and stenting, and in 206 prasugrel- (n = 118) or ticagrelor-treated (n = 88) ACS patients following acute PCI. Cut-off values for high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity (HRPR) were based on previous studies showing an association of test results with clinical outcomes.ResultsHyperuricemia was significantly associated with increased on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients in univariate analyses and after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics by multivariate regression analyses. In contrast, ticagrelor-treated patients without and with hyperuricemia showed similar levels of on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to ADP. HRPR occurred more frequently in clopidogrel- and prasugrel-treated patients with hyperuricemia than in those with normal uric acid levels. In contrast, hyperuricemic patients receiving ticagrelor did not have a higher risk of HRPR compared with those with normal uric acid levels.ConclusionHyperuricemia is associated with decreased platelet inhibition by thienopyridines but a normal response to ticagrelor. It remains to be established if lowering uric acid increases the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and prasugrel in hyperuricemic patients with HRPR.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Diabetic Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

BackgroundIncreased comorbidities and a perceived high-bleeding risk often prevent the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in female patients. However, more aggressive antiplatelet treatment would certainly offer additional outcome benefits in coronary artery disease, especially among diabetic patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the gender differences in high-residual on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) among diabetic patients treated with DAPT. MethodsOur population is represented by a consecutive cohort of diabetic patients treated with DAPT (ASA + clopidogrel, ticagrelor or dose-adjusted prasugrel) for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI, undergoing platelet reactivity assessment at 30–90 days post-discharge. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry and in diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy, by light transmission aggregometry, surface expression of P-selectin and plasma concentration of Thromboxane B2. ResultsWe included 472 patients, 113 (23.9%) women. Female gender was associated with more advanced age, and increased comorbidities. Mean platelet reactivity did not differ according to gender. The rate of HRPR was similar in women as compared to men (for ASA: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.59[0.27–1.33], p = 0.21, for ADP-antagonists: adjusted OR[95%CI] = 1.24[0.25–1.80], p = 0.27), however, the benefits of the new ADP-antagonists on platelet reactivity were lower in women than in men (p interaction = 0.01).No impact of gender on platelet reactivity was confirmed among 50 diabetic patients naïve to antiplatelet therapy. ConclusionsAmong diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy gender does not affect platelet reactivity or high-on treatment platelet reactivity. However, the enhanced platelet inhibition provided by the new-ADP antagonists of new-ADP antagonists could be mitigated in women.

Association Between Residual Platelet Reactivity on Clopidogrel Treatment and Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Intrinsic Hypercoagulability as a Mediator.

High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) was associated with greater atherosclerosis burden. We examined whether intrinsic hypercoagulability (IHC) could be attributed to that association in patients treated by drug-eluting stents. This retrospective observation enrolled a total of 891 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects. Platelet and coagulant reactivity was measured by thrombelastography. At least 24h after a 300-mg dose of clopidogrel, adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced maximum amplitude of clot strength (MAadp) > 47mm represented HRPR. Thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (MAthrombin) and blood fibrinogen surrogated intrinsic coagulability. Using mediation analysis to evaluate the effect of IHC on the relationship between the number of narrowed coronaries and HRPR on clopidogrel. More HRPR on clopidogrel and higher intrinsic coagulability were observed in more severe coronary atherosclerosis, especially in the three-vessel disease. After adjustment for confounding factors, the number of narrowed coronaries (ORadj = 1.343, 95% CI 1.063-1.695, p = 0.013), MAthrombin (ORadj = 1.106, 95% CI 1.058-1.157, p < 0.001), and fibrinogen (ORadj = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, p = 0.012) were all independent positive predictors for HRPR. MAthrombin and fibrinogen were meaningful mediators for the significant positive association of the number of narrowed vessels and HRPR on clopidogrel, which were enhanced by around 30% and 43%, respectively, for this effect. This is the first study to demonstrate that the positive correlation between the number of stenotic coronaries and HRPR on clopidogrel may be partly attributed to IHC, which may enhance the risk stratification, guide more precise coagulation in multi-vessel disease after drug-eluting stents, and therefore deserve further study.

Response to aspirin therapy in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms depends on the platelet count

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are at an increased risk of thrombotic events even during antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. In the current study, we sought to investigate the association of the platelet count with the inhibitory potential of antiplatelet therapy in MPN. We determined arachidonic acid (AA)- and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity by multiple electrode aggregometry in 93 patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera or primary myelofibrosis. In patients without aspirin therapy (n = 44), the platelet count did not correlate with platelet aggregation. In aspirin-treated patients (n = 49), we observed a moderate correlation of residual AA-inducible platelet aggregation with the platelet count (r = 0.49; P < 0.001). Further, patients with high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity to AA (HRPR AA) had a significantly higher platelet count than patients without HRPR AA (547 × 109/L [340 - 644 × 109/L] vs 358 × 109/L [242 - 501 × 109/L], P = 0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a platelet count of ≥317 × 109/L as best threshold to distinguish between patients without and with HRPR AA (area under the curve: 0.73). After adding the direct ADP P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor to blood samples from all 93 patients in vitro, residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity correlated weakly with the platelet count (r = 0.26, P = 0.01), but the platelet count did not differ significantly between patients with and without HRPR ADP (396 × 109/L [316 - 644 × 109/L] vs 340 × 109/L [241 - 489 × 109/L]; P = 0.2). In conclusion, our findings suggest that the extent of platelet inhibition by aspirin in patients with MPN at least in part depends on their individual platelet count.

Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Are Linked to Impaired Clopidogrel-Mediated Platelet Inhibition.

Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are an independent predictor of ischemic events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This may in part be due to decreased clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in patients with low HDL-C. We investigated the association of HDL-C with on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) in 314 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin undergoing angioplasty and stenting. Platelet P-selectin expression was assessed by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation was determined by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were inversely associated with P-selectin expression and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (both P ≤ .01). Moreover, we found a positive correlation of HDL-C with surface coverage by the Impact-R ( P = .003). Patients with low HDL-C (≤35 mg/dL) exhibited a significantly higher P-selectin expression in response to ADP and higher platelet aggregation by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the Impact-R than patients with normal HDL-C (>35 mg/dL; all P < .05). High on-treatment residual platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay occurred significantly more frequently in patients with low HDL-C levels than in those with normal HDL-C (47.4% vs 30.1%, P = .01). In conclusion, low HDL-C is linked to impaired clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after angioplasty and stenting.

How does measurement of platelet P-selectin compare with other methods of measuring platelet function as a means of determining the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy?

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y12 antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as “non-responders” to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y12 Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y12 Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y12 Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y12 test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.

Traitement antiagrégant plaquettaire chez la femme : une spécificité liée au sexe ?

Women is a fragile and complex substet of patients, under-represented in clinical trials, but experiencing growing cardiovascular events, with higher mortality, delayed presentation, higher bleeding complications and undertreatment with antithrombotic therapies, compared to their male counterparts. Female gender has been associated with enhanced basal platelet reactivity, high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity and various responses to antiplatelet agents. Growing concern on gender-specificity has emerged, including potential difference in women compared with men on the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy in primary or secondary prevention and according the antiplatelet agent used. We provide here a review of available data on antiplatelet therapy in women.

Liver Function is Associated With Response to Clopidogrel Therapy in Patients Undergoing Angioplasty and Stenting.

The relationship between liver function and clopidogrel response has not been studied so far. We therefore sought to investigate the associations between 3 parameters of liver synthesis and on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. On-treatment platelet reactivity was determined by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in 316 patients undergoing angioplasty with stent implantation for cardiovascular disease. Cholinesterase, serum albumin, and total cholesterol levels were measured by internationally standardized assays in the hospital's central laboratory. On-treatment platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay correlated inversely with cholinesterase, serum albumin, and total cholesterol levels (all P ≤ .02). The inverse associations of cholinesterase and serum albumin levels with platelet reactivity remained significant after adjustment for cytochrome P450 loss-of-function polymorphisms and other factors that were previously associated with high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR; both P < .05). Patients without HRPR by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay had significantly higher levels of serum albumin and total cholesterol than patients with HRPR (both P = .008). In conclusion, liver function is associated with response to clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease.

Impact of diabetes on immature platelets fraction and its relationship with platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Contrasting data have been reported so far on the role of reticulated platelets in suboptimal response to antiplatelet therapies. In particular, still unexplored is whether they may contribute to explain the higher risk of thrombotic complications observed in diabetic patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on the levels of reticulated platelets and its relationship with high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients treated with ASA (100-160mg) and clopidogrel (75mg daily) or ticagrelor (90mg twice a day) platelet reactivity and the reticulated platelets fraction (immature platelets fraction, IPF) were assessed at 30-90days post-discharge for an acute coronary syndrome or elective PCI. Aggregation was assessed by multiple-electrode aggregometry. We included 386 patients, 158 (40.9%) diabetics. The percentage of IPF was similar in diabetic and non diabetic patients, both at baseline (3.5±2.5 vs 3.6±2.7%, p=0.91) and at 30-90days re-assessment (3.3±2.1 vs 3.5±2.5%, p=0.30), with diabetes not emerging as an independent predictor of IPF above III tertile (adjusted OR [95%CI]=0.58 [0.30-1.09], p=0.10). Diabetic patients displayed an enhanced platelet reactivity and a higher rate of HRPR with ADP antagonists (32.8 vs 22.5%, p=0.009). However, no association was found between the percentage of IPF and platelet function (r=-0.004; p=0.95 for ASPI test, r=-0.04; p=0.59 for ADP-mediated aggregation), or the rate of HRPR for ADP antagonsist across IPF tertiles. Results were similar for diabetics both receiving clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Diabetic patients display a higher platelet reactivity and suboptimal response to ADP-antagonists. However, the rate of reticulated platelets is neither influenced by diabetic status nor associated with an increased platelet reactivity among diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for a recent acute coronary syndrome or PCI.

Gender Differences in Platelet Reactivity in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Cardiovascular risk is still underestimated in women, experiencing higher mortality and worse prognosis after acute cardiovascular events. Gender differences have been reported in thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), thus suggesting a potential variability in platelet reactivity according to sex. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of gender on platelet function and the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) during DAPT in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary revascularization. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test >862AU*min (for ASA) and ADP test values ≥417AU*min (for ADP-antagonists). We included 541 patients on DAPT, 122 (22.6%) of whom were females. Females were older (p<0.001), displayed more frequently hypercholesterolemia (p=0.003), renal failure (p=0.04), acute presentation (p<0.001), higher cholesterol levels and platelets count (p<0.001). Inverse association was demonstrated with smoking (p<0.001), previous PCI (p=0.04) and statin use (p=0.03), creatinine and haemoglobin (p<0.001). Female gender did not influence mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR for ASA (1.7% vs 1.4%, OR[95%CI]=1.14[0.17-4.36], p=0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.54[0.20-11.6], p=0.68) or ADP-antagonists (26.3% vs 22.8%, OR[95%CI]=1.17[0.52-1.34], p=0.45, adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.05[0.59-1.86], p=0.87). Results did not change when considering separately the 309 patients treated with clopidogrel (34% vs 31.3%, OR[95%CI]=1.13[0.62-2.07], p=0.76, adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.35[0.63-2.9], p=0.44 for females vs males), or patients (n=232) on ticagrelor (20.4% vs 11.1%, OR[95%CI]=2.27[0.99-5.17], p=0.06 for females vs males), confirmedafter correction for baseline differences (adjusted OR[95%CI]=1.21[0.28-2.29], p=0.68). In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, gender does not impact on the prevalence of high-on treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) with the major antiplatelet agents ASA, clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Advanced age and high‐residual platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or ticagrelor

ESSENTIALS: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in elderly patients requires balancing bleedings and thrombosis. Impact of age on high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) on DAPT was studied. A reduced effectiveness of adenosine diphosphate antagonists was observed over 70 years of age. The occurrence of HRPR was increased among elderly patients with both clopidogrel and ticagrelor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of age on platelet function and the occurrence of high residual on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using acetylsalicilic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Patients treated with DAPT (ASA and clopidogrel or ticagrelor) were scheduled for platelet function assessment at 30-90 days post-discharge. By whole blood impedance aggregometry, HRPR was considered for ASPI test values > 862 AU*min (for ASA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test values > 417 AU*min (for ADP antagonists). Elderly patients were defined as those aged ≥ 70 years. Among 494 patients on DAPT, 224 (45.3%) were ≥ 70 years old. ADP-mediated platelet aggregation increased with decades of age (279.3 ± 148.6 vs. 319.6 ± 171.1 vs. 347.3 ± 190.1 vs. 345.7 ± 169.2), whereas no difference was observed for ASA response. A reduced effectiveness of ADP antagonists was observed among elderly patients; in fact, among the 117 patients displaying HRPR (23.7%), a higher prevalence was observed among patients over 70 years old (30.4% vs. 18.1%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 2.19 [1.29-3.71]). Similar results were obtained among the 266 clopidogrel-treated patients (38.5% vs. 27.9%; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.91 [1.46-5.8]) and in the 228 patients receiving ticagrelor (19.1% vs. 8.1%; adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.55 [1.02-8.59]). In patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, advanced age is independently associated with a reduced effectiveness of ADP antagonists and a higher rate of HRPR with both clopidogrel and ticagrelor.

Comparison of Aggregometry with Flow Cytometry for the Assessment of Agonists´-Induced Platelet Reactivity in Patients on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Data on the agreement between aggregometry and platelet activation by flow cytometry regarding the measurement of on-treatment platelet reactivity to arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) are scarce. We therefore sought to compare three platelet aggregation tests with flow cytometry for the assessment of the response to antiplatelet therapy. Platelet aggregation in response to AA and ADP was determined by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the VerifyNow assays, and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 316 patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel therapy after angioplasty with stent implantation. AA- and ADP-induced P-selectin expression and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa were determined by flow cytometry. LTA, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and MEA in response to ADP correlated significantly (all p<0.001), and the best correlation was observed between LTA and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (r = 0.63). ADP-induced platelet reactivity by all aggregation tests correlated significantly with ADP-induced P-selectin expression and activated GPIIb/IIIa (all p<0.001). The best correlation was seen between the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and activated GPIIb/IIIa (r = 0.68). The platelet surface expressions of P-selectin and activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to ADP were significantly higher in patients with high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) to ADP by all test systems (all p<0.001). A rather poor correlation was observed between AA-induced platelet reactivity by LTA and the VerifyNow aspirin assay (r = 0.15, p = 0.007), while both methods did not correlate with MEA. AA-induced platelet reactivity by all aggregation tests correlated significantly, but rather poorly with AA-induced P-selectin expression (all p<0.05), while only AA-induced platelet reactivity by LTA correlated significantly with AA-induced activated GPIIb/IIIa (r = 0.21, p<0.001). The platelet surface expression of P-selectin in response to AA was significantly higher in patients with HRPR by LTA AA and MEA AA (both p<0.02). In contrast, P-selectin expression in response to AA was similar in patients without and with HRPR by the VerifyNow aspirin assay (p = 0.5), and platelet surface activated GPIIb/IIIa in response to AA did not differ significantly between patients without and with HRPR to AA by all test systems (all p>0.1). In conclusion, ADP-induced platelet reactivity by aggregometry translates partly into flow cytometry. In contrast, AA-induced platelet reactivity correlates poorly between different platelet aggregation tests, and between aggregometry and flow cytometry. Overall, both approaches capture different aspects of platelet function and are therefore not interchangeable in the assessment of agonists´-induced platelet reactivity. Clinical outcome data are needed to determine which test systems and settings are associated with different in vivo consequences.

Clopidogrel use in end-stage kidney disease.

Clopidogrel irreversibly binds to the P2Y12 platelet receptor and acts as a potent inhibitor of platelet activation and aggregation. It is currently recommended for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes, recent ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Clopidogrel is a prodrug requiring hepatic conversion into its active metabolite. In the general population, genetic polymorphisms in the CYP2C19 gene interfering with hepatic conversion and the ABCB1 gene interfering with gut absorption of clopidogrel, account for the large interindividual response to clopidogrel and clopidogrel resistance. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESKD are independent risk factors for clopidogrel resistance; 50-80% of patients with ESKD have high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity when treated with clopidogrel. This may partially explain the abysmal outcomes for patients with kidney disease post coronary intervention. Several assays are used to determine residual on-treatment platelet reactivity; however, their use in tailoring the suitability of clopidogrel treatment in patients with ESKD is unclear. Although clopidogrel decreased cardiovascular events in the general population after acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous intervention in the CURE and CREDO trials, a reanalysis of these studies in patients with CKD (eGFR <60ml/minute) showed either a reduced or no benefit from clopidogrel treatment. ESKD patients were not represented in these two large trials; this is true for most of the trials that established clopidogrel as an integral part of the therapeutic armamentarium for cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, clopidogrel has been associated with an increased risk of death, death from bleeding, and hospitalization for bleeding in patients with ESKD. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that ESKD patients may not derive the same benefits from clopidogrel therapy as the general population and this therapy may be associated with harm. Properly designed observational studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the role of clopidogrel in patients with ESKD, the use of platelet assays to tailor therapy, and the role of other antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients who exhibit high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity.

Human neutrophil α-defensins are associated with adenosine diphosphate-inducible neutrophil-platelet aggregate formation and response to clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerosis

Human neutrophil α-defensins (HNPs) are antimicrobial peptides stored primarily in the azurophilic granules of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Recently, it was shown that HNPs act as platelet agonists. We hypothesized that HNP levels are associated with the formation of neutrophil-platelet aggregates, and that they influence the response to clopidogrel therapy. HNP levels were determined by a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 305 patients undergoing angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Neutrophil-platelet aggregates were measured by flow cytometry, and on-treatment platelet reactivity was determined using the VerifyNow P2Y12 and aspirin assays. HNP levels did not correlate with the formation of neutrophil-platelet aggregates invivo (r=0.05, P=0.4). In contrast, HNP levels correlated significantly with adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-inducible neutrophil-platelet aggregate formation (r=0.13, P=0.04). On-treatment platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was significantly more pronounced in patients with high HNP levels compared with patients with low HNP levels (211 P2Y12 reaction units [PRU; range, 143-293 PRU] vs 181 PRU [range, 129-237 PRU], P=0.009). This association remained significant after adjusting for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 by multivariate regression analysis (P=0.007). Moreover, high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was more frequent in patients with high HNP levels than in patients with low HNP levels (40% vs 26.6%, P=0.01). In conclusion, HNP levels are associated with ADP-inducible neutrophil-platelet aggregate formation and clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition. High levels of HNPs may, in part, be responsible for the observed response variability to clopidogrel.