High On-treatment Platelet Reactivity Research Articles

Association of Age- and Body Mass Index-Stratified High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity With Coronary Intervention Outcomes in East Asian Patients.

Although age and body mass index (BMI) significantly affect platelet reactivity units and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention, there are limited data on the relationship between high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and clinical outcomes on age and BMI differences. Thus, we investigated the association of HPR with clinical outcomes according to age and BMI. The study analyzed 11 714 patients who underwent platelet function tests after percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), whereas the secondary end point was major bleeding. HPR was defined as platelet reactivity units ≥252. Patients were categorized by age (<67 years of age or ≥67 years of age) and BMI (≤22.6 kg/m2 or >22.6 kg/m2). Patients <67 years of age with HPR had increases in both MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.436 [95% CI, 1.106-1.867]; P=0.007) and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 1.584 [95% CI, 1.095-2.290]; P=0.015) compared with the those with non-HPR, respectively. In patients ≥67 years of age with HPR, there were no differences in MACCEs, but there was a decrease in major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.721 [95% CI, 0.542-0.959]; P=0.024). Meanwhile, patients with HPR with BMI >22.6 kg/m2 had increases in MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.387 [95% CI, 1.140-1.688]; P=0.001). No differences were shown in major bleeding. HPR was linked to an increase in MACCEs or a decrease in major bleeding in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention, depending on age and BMI. This study is the first to observe that clinical outcomes in patients with HPR after percutaneous coronary intervention may vary based on age and BMI. Because the study is observational, the results should be viewed as hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for randomized clinical trials.

Inflammation modifies the platelet reactivity among thrombocytopenia patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients combined with thrombocytopenia (TP) are usually considered to be at low ischemic risk, receiving less proper antiplatelet therapy. However, recent studies reported a paradoxical phenomenon that PCI patients with TP were prone to experience thrombotic events, while the mechanisms and future treatment remain unclear. We aim to investigate whether inflammation modifies platelet reactivity among these patients. Consecutive 10 724 patients undergoing PCI in Fuwai Hospital were enrolled throughout 2013. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥2 mg/L was considered inflammatory status. TP was defined as platelet count <150×109/L. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was defined as adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet maximum amplitude of thromboelastogram >47mm. Among 6617 patients finally included, 879 (13.3%) presented with TP. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that patients with TP were associated with a lower risk of HTPR (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.76) than those without TP in the overall cohort. In further analysis, among hsCRP <2 mg/L group, patients with TP exhibited a decreased risk of HTPR (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41–0.68); however, in hsCRP ≥2mg/L group, TP patients had a similar risk of HTPR as those without TP (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63–1.08). Additionally, these results remain consistent across subgroups, including patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and chronic coronary syndrome. Inflammation modified the platelet reactivity of PCI patients with TP, providing new insights into the mechanisms of the increased thrombotic risk. Future management for this special population should pay more attention to inflammation status and timely adjustment of antiplatelet therapy in TP patients with inflammation.

Immediate Platelet Inhibition Strategy for Comatose Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Background: Comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and target temperature management (TTM) are at increased risk of stent thrombosis (ST), partly due to delayed platelet inhibition even with more potent P2Y12 agents. We hypothesized that periprocedural cangrelor would induce immediate platelet inhibition, bridging the "P2Y12 inhibition gap". Methods: In our pilot study, we randomized 30 comatose OHCA patients undergoing PCI and TTM (32-34 °C) into cangrelor and control groups. Both groups received unfractioned heparin, acetylsalicylic acid, and ticagrelor via enteral tube. The cangrelor group also received an intravenous bolus of cangrelor followed by a 4 h infusion. Platelet inhibition was measured using VerifyNow® and Multiplate® ADP at baseline and 1, 3, 5, and 8 h post PCI. Results: Patient characteristics did not differ between groups. VerifyNow® showed significantly decreased platelet reactivity with cangrelor at 1 h (30 vs. 221 PRU; p < 0.001) and 3 h (24 vs. 180 PRU; p < 0.001), with differences at 5 and 8 h. Similarly, the proportion of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) in the cangrelor group was significantly lower at 1 h (0% vs. 67%; p < 0.001) and 3 h (0% vs. 47%; p = 0.007). Multiplate® ADP was also decreased at 1 h (14 vs. 48 U; p < 0.001) and 3 h (11 vs. 42 U; p = 0.001), with no difference at 5 and 8 h. The occurrence of bleeding events was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Cangrelor safely induced immediate and profound platelet inhibition. We observed no significant drug-drug interaction with ticagrelor.

Impact of Platelet Hyperreactivity and Diabetes Mellitus on Ischemic Stroke Recurrence: A Single-Center Cohort Clinical Study.

Ischemic stroke recurrence (ISR) is prevented by inhibiting platelet function. To investigate the impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) assessed by thromboelastography (TEG) and its risk factors on ISR in individuals who have experienced acute ischemic stroke (AIS) receiving dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT). At the end of follow-up, a total of 264 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in this cohort study. The primary endpoint event was a recurrence of ischemic stroke within 90 days of onset. The ISR rate was 7.2% (19/264). The recurrence rate in the HTPR group was 15.1% (8/53), which was significantly higher than the 5.2% (11/211) in the non-HTPR group (p = 0.013), and the type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) group (12.5%, 10/80) was also significantly higher compared to the non-T2DM group (4.9%, 9/184) (p = 0.028). T2DM was an isolated risk factor for HTPR (adjusted OR = 3.06, 95% CI 1.57-5.98, P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots showed that the cumulative risk (CR) of ISR was statistically different in the HTPR and T2DM groups compared to the non-HTPR group (log-rank P = 0.009) and the non-T2DM group (log-rank P = 0.026), respectively. The HTPR and T2DM groups had greater hazard ratios (HR) of ISR than the non-HTPR (adjusted HR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.06-7.32, P = 0.038) and non-T2DM (adjusted HR = 2.64, 95% CI 1.01-6.92, P = 0.049) groups. Both HTPR and T2DM are linked to ISR. Platelet Inhibition Rate (PIR) of TEG can early identify patients who are at high risk for having another ischemic stroke in patients undergoing DAPT, and this study may offer more evidence in favor of clinically personalized treatment and secondary prevention tactics.

Gut microbiota as predictors of the occurrence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in acute ischemic stroke patients.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between gut microbiota and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We enrolled a total of 48 AIS patients, including 19 HTPR patients and 29 non-high on-treatment platelet reactivity (NHTPR) patients, along with 10 healthy controls. Clinical and laboratory data, as well as stool samples, were collected from all participants. The composition and function of gut microbiota were assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Differences in the gut microbiota between the two groups were analyzed, and a diagnostic model based on the gut microbiota was established using random forest model. HTPR patients exhibited a decreased microbial richness compared to NHTPR patients. Additionally, the relative abundance of unidentified_Clostridia and Ralstonia was lower in HTPR patients. Significant differences in biological functions, such as toxoplasmosis, were observed between the two groups. The combination of Ralstonia, unidentified-Clostridia, Mailhella, Anaerofustis, and Aggregatibacter showed excellent predictive ability for HTPR occurrence (AUC=0.896). When comparing AIS patients with healthy controls, alterations in the microbiota structure were observed in AIS patients, with imbalances in short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria and pathogenic bacteria. Significant differences in biological functions, such as oxidative phosphorylation, were noted between the two groups. The combination of Alloprevotella, Terrisporobacter, Streptococcus, Proteus, and unidentified_Bacteria exhibited strong predictive power for AIS occurrence (AUC=0.994). This study is the first to uncover the microbial characteristics of HTPR in AIS patients and demonstrate the predictive potential of specific bacterial combinations for HTPR occurrence.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review.

To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients. A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021. A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review. No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

A novel machine learning model to predict high on-treatment platelet reactivity on clopidogrel in Asianpatients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Various genetic and nongenetic variables influence the high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients taking clopidogrel. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) model to predict HTPR in Chinese patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This cohort study collected information on 507 patients taking clopidogrel. Data were randomly divided into a training set (90%) and a testing set (10%). Nine candidate Machine learning (ML) models and multiple logistic regression (LR) analysis were developed on the training set. Their performance was assessed according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy on the test set. Model interpretations were generated using importance scores by transforming model variables into scaled features and representing in radar plots. Finally, we established a prediction platform for the prediction of HTPR. A total of 461 patients (HTPR rate: 19.52%) were enrolled in building the prediction model for HTPR. The XGBoost model had an optimized performance, with an AUC of 0.82, a precision of 0.80, a recall of 0.44, an F1 score of 0.57, and an accuracy of 0.87, which was superior to those of LR. Furthermore, the XGBoost method identified 7 main predictive variables. To facilitate the application of the model, we established an XGBoost prediction platform consisting of 7 variables and all variables for the HTPR prediction. A ML-based approach, such as XGBoost, showed optimum performance and might help predict HTPR on clopidogrel after PCI and guide clinical decision-making. Further validated studies will strengthen this finding.

An assessment of platelet response to ticagrelor in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients using light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA)

Background: Low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) or High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with bleeding (LTPR) or ischemic events (HTPR) in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: Mapping of Indonesian patients’ platelet response secondary to ticagrelor and thus identifying either LTPR or HTPR. Method: During May – June 2019, 20 post-PCI patients on aspirin–ticagrelor combination were included. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) for monitoring platelet function was used. Ticagrelor’s LTA &lt;40% is LTPR while &gt;70% is HTPR. Result: Patients were mostly male (18 patients) and aged between 40-73 years old with a history of diabetes and/or hypertension and smoking. About eight patients (40%) were LTPR and one (5%) patient was HTPR. Conclusion: A personalised DAPT strategy for preventing bleeding events, a de-escalation, might be valuable for Indonesian patients.

Effect of lipid-lowering therapy on platelet reactivity in patients treated with and without antiplatelet therapy.

Circulating lipoproteins may interact with platelets, increasing platelet sensitivity to aggregating agonists and their tendency towards activation and thrombus formation. In particular, patients with hypercholesterolemia exhibit a higher degree of platelet reactivity compared to normolipidemic. Moreover, accruing evidence report that lipid-lowering therapies can reduce thrombus formation, particularly in the absence of concomitant antiplatelet therapy. However, the underlying biological mechanism(s) explaining these clinical observations are not completely understood. Baseline platelet reactivity and high on-treatment platelet reactivity while on antiplatelet therapy (e.g., aspirin and clopidogrel) are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, strategies to reduce baseline platelet reactivity or improve the pharmacodynamic profile of antiplatelet therapies are an unmet clinical need. The potential use of lipid-lowering therapies for optimizing platelet reactivity provides several advantages as there is strong evidence that reducing circulating lipoproteins can improve clinical outcomes, and they may avoid the need for potent antiplatelet therapies that, although more effective, are associated with increased bleeding risk. This review will provide a systematic overview of the effects of lipid-lowering therapy on platelet reactivity in patients treated with and without antiplatelet therapy. We will focus on the potential biological mechanism(s) of action and the effect of statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors, omega-3 fatty acids, and recombinant high-density lipoprotein on platelet reactivity. Ultimately, we will assess the current gaps in the literature and future perspective in the field.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with high α-tubulin acetylation in circulating platelets from coronary artery disease patients

Platelet inhibition is the main treatment strategy to prevent atherothrombotic complications after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combining aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) persists in some patients due to poor response to treatment and is associated with ischemic risk. Tubulin acetylation has been pointed out as a hallmark of stable microtubules responsible for the discoid shape of resting platelets. However, the impact of antiplatelet treatments on this post-translational modification has never been studied. This study investigated whether tubulin acetylation differs according to antiplatelet therapy and on-treatment platelet reactivity. Platelets were isolated from arterial blood samples of 240 patients admitted for coronary angiography, and levels of α-tubulin acetylation on lysine 40 (α-tubulin K40 acetylation) were assessed by western blot. We show that platelet α-tubulin K40 acetylation was significantly increased in DAPT-treated patients. In addition, the proportion of patients with high levels of α-tubulin K40 acetylation was drastically reduced among DAPT-treated patients with HPR. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that DAPT resulting in adequate platelet inhibition was strongly associated with elevated α-tubulin K40 acetylation. In conclusion, our study highlights the role of elevated platelet α-tubulin K40 acetylation as a marker of platelet inhibition in response to DAPT. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03034148.

Guided Anti-P2Y12 Therapy in Patients Undergoing PCI: Three Systematic Reviews with Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials with Homogeneous Design.

The value of guided therapy (GT) with anti-P2Y12 drugs in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. Meta-analyses lumped together randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with heterogeneous designs, comparing either genotype-GT or platelet function test (PFT)-GT with unguided therapy. Some meta-analysis also included RCTs that did not explore GT, but included the effects of switching patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to alternative therapies (HTPR-Therapy). We performed three distinct systematic reviews/meta-analyses, each exploring only RCTs with homogeneous design. MEDLINE, Embase, and Central databases were searched for RCTs testing genotype-GT, PFT-GT, or HTPR-Therapy in PCI-treated patients, through October 1, 2022. Two reviewers extracted the data. Risk ratios (RRs) (95% confidence intervals) were calculated. Primary outcomes were major bleedings (MBs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In seven genotype-GT RCTs, RRs were: MB, 1.06 (0.73-1.54; p = 0.76); MACE, 0.65 (0.47-0.91; p = 0.01), but significant risk reduction was observed in RCTs performed in China (0.30, 0.16-0.54; p < 0.0001) and not elsewhere (0.75, 0.48-1.18; p = 0.21). In six PFT-GT RCTs, RRs were: MB, 0.91 (0.64-1.28, p = 0.58); MACE, 0.82 (0.56-1.19; p = 0.30): 0.62 (0.42-0.93; p = 0.02) in China, 1.08 (0.82-1.41; p = 0.53) elsewhere. In eight HTPR-Therapy RCTs, RRs were: MB, 0.71 (0.41-1.23; p = 0.22); MACE, 0.57 (0.44-0.75; p < 0.0001): 0.56 (0.43-0.74, p < 0.0001) in China, 0.58 (0.27-1.23, p = 0.16) elsewhere. No GT strategy affected MB. Overall, genotype-GT but not PFT-GT reduced MACE. However, genotype-GT and PFT-GT reduced MACE in China, but not elsewhere. PFT-GT performed poorly compared to HTPR-Therapy, likely due to inaccurate identification of HTPR patients by PFT.

Plasma protein signatures for high on-treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel in peripheral artery disease

BackgroundA significant proportion of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) displays a poor response to aspirin and/or the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel. This phenomenon is reflected by high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in platelet function assays in vitro and is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. ObjectiveThis study aimed to elucidate specific plasma protein signatures associated with HTPR to aspirin and clopidogrel in PAD patients. Methods and resultsBased on targeted plasma proteomics, 184 proteins from two cardiovascular Olink panels were measured in 105 PAD patients. VerifyNow ASPI- and P2Y12-test values were transformed to a continuous variable representing HTPR as a spectrum instead of cut-off level-defined HTPR. Using the Boruta random forest algorithm, the importance of 3 plasma proteins for HTPR in the aspirin, six in clopidogrel and 10 in the pooled group (clopidogrel or aspirin) was confirmed. Network analysis demonstrated clusters with CD84, SLAMF7, IL1RN and THBD for clopidogrel and with F2R, SELPLG, HAVCR1, THBD, PECAM1, TNFRSF10B, MERTK and ADM for the pooled group. F2R, TNFRSF10B and ADM were higher expressed in Fontaine III patients compared to Fontaine II, suggesting their relation with PAD severity. ConclusionsA plasma protein signature, including eight targets involved in proatherogenic dysfunction of blood cell-vasculature interaction, coagulation and cell death, is associated with HTPR (aspirin and/or clopidogrel) in PAD. This may serve as important systems-based determinants of poor platelet responsiveness to aspirin and/or clopidogrel in PAD and other cardiovascular diseases and may contribute to identify novel treatment strategies.

Variability of response on prophylactic prasugrel for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Clinical implications.

Prophylactic prasugrel for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms has been introduced and increased, but HTPR (high on-treatment platelet reactivity) or LTPR (low on-treatment platelet reactivity) of prasugrel is not uncommon in clinical circumstances. To investigate the predisposing factors of HTPR and LTPR on prasugrel premedication in the neurointerventional field and to determine its clinical implications. Between February 2016 and December 2020, 191 patients treated with coil embolization using prophylactic prasugrel in 234 intracranial aneurysms were the final candidates for this study. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, clinical status, and laboratory study values were carefully reviewed retrospectively. We performed risk factor analyses for HTPR and LTPR on prasugrel. Ultimately, 20 patients (10.5%) had HTPR, and 74 patients (38.7%) were categorized as having LTPR. In multivariable analyses, the factors related to HTPR were BMI (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.41, p = 0.01), history of antithrombotics (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.39-10.34, p = 0.01), and hematocrit (adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, p = 0.03). Low BMI was the only risk factor for LTPR (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.001). In the neurointerventional field, high BMI and prior use of antithrombotic agents were related to HTPR, and low BMI was associated with LTPR on prophylactic prasugrel. High hematocrit levels decreased the risk of HTPR. When preparing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, attention to patients with these clinical features is required to address the possibility of ischemic or bleeding complications.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator Pharmacodynamic Study of Platelet Inhibition with Crushed and Integral Formulations of Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Crushed formulations of specific antiplatelet agents produce earlier and stronger platelet inhibition. We studied the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and its relative efficacy compared with integral clopidogrel, crushed and integral ticagrelor. We aimed to compare the platelet inhibitory effect of crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Overall, 142 patients with suspected ACS were randomly assigned to receive crushed or integral formulations of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Platelet inhibition at baseline and 1 and 8h was assessed using the VerifyNow assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) ≥ 235 P2Y12reaction units (PRUs) 1h after the medication loading dose was also determined. The PRU and percentage inhibition median (interquartile range) at 1h for the different formulations were as follows: crushed clopidogrel: 196.50 (155.50, 246.50), 9.36 (- 1.79, 25.10); integral clopidogrel: 189.50 (159.00, 214.00), 2.32 (- 2.67, 19.89); crushed ticagrelor: 59.00 (10.00, 96.00), 75.53 (49.12, 95.18); and integral ticagrelor: 126.50 (50.00, 168.00), 40.56 (25.59, 78.69). There was no significant difference in PRU or percentage platelet inhibition between the crushed and integral formulations of clopidogrel (p=0.990, p=0.479); both formulations of ticagrelor were superior to the clopidogrel formulations (p<0.05). On paired comparison, crushed ticagrelor showed robust early inhibition of platelets compared with the integral formulation (p=0.03). Crushed clopidogrel exhibited the maximal HTPR of 34.3%, but was < 3% for both formulations of ticagrelor. The platelet inhibitory effect of crushed clopidogrel is not superior to integral preparation in patients with ACS. Crushed ticagrelor produced maximal platelet inhibition acutely. HTPR rates in ACS are similar and very low with both formulations of ticagrelor, and maximal with crushed clopidogrel. Clinical Trials Registry of India identifier number CTRI/2020/06/025647.

Impact of platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 genotypes and DNA methylation on platelet reactivity in patients with recurrent ischemic stroke treated with clopidogrel.

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of genetic variation and DNA methylation of PEAR1 rs12041331 in high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS). Genotype, methylation, and mRNA of PEAR1 rs12041331 were detected in patients with cerebral ischemia, for the analysis of the effect of PEAR1 rs12041331 on HPR and RIS. The major G allele of PEAR1 rs12041331 was associated with hypermethylation, which was associated with HPR. This link was not observed for RIS. The PEAR1 rs12041331 genetic polymorphism and DNA methylation may be among the genetic factors affecting HPR. The correlation between PEAR1 and RIS needs to be studied further.

Antiplatelet therapy adjustment improved the radiomic characteristics of acute silent cerebral infarction after stent-assisted coiling in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity: A prospective study.

We aimed to investigate the effects of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and antiplatelet therapy adjustment on high-risk radiomic features in patients with antiplatelet therapy adjustment on acute silent cerebral infarction (ASCI) who had unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) after stent placement. This single-institution study prospectively included 230 UIA patients who had ACSI after stent placement in our hospital between January 2015 and July 2020. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) after stent placement and 1,485 radiomic features were extracted from each patient. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression methods were used for selection of high-risk radiomic features associated with clinical symptoms. In addition, 199 patients with ASCI were classified into three groups: controls without HPR (n = 113), HPR patients with standard antiplatelet therapy (n = 63) and HPR patients with antiplatelet therapy adjustment (n = 23). We compared high-risk radiomic features between three groups. Of the patients who had acute infarction after MRI-DWI, 31 (13.5%) exhibited clinical symptoms. Eight risk radiomic features associated with clinical symptoms were selected, and the radiomics signature exhibited good performance. In ASCI patients, compared with controls, the radiomic characteristics of ischemic lesion in HPR patients were consistent with the following high-risk radiomic features associated with clinical symptoms: higher gray-level values, greater variance in intensity values, and greater homogeneity. However, the adjustment of antiplatelet therapy in HPR patients modified the high-risk radiomic features, which showed lower gray-level values, less variance in intensity values, and more heterogeneous texture. The radiomic shape feature of elongation showed no notable difference between three groups. Adjustment of antiplatelet therapy might reduce the high-risk radiomic features of UIA patients with HPR after stent placement.

CD80 DNA methylation and single-nucleotide polymorphism associated with clopidogrel response: a whole-genome DNA methylation analysis in acute coronary syndrome

BackgroundDual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is the primary treatment for patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the interindividual difference in clopidogrel response is remarkable, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) can increase the risk of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. ObjectiveWe studied novel accessible factors that possibly affect clopidogrel response in DNA methylation. MethodsMethylation 850K bead chips were used to detect DNA methylation levels. The platelet reactivity index (PRI) was determined in 330 subjects with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after administration of clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose or at least 5 days of 75 mg daily maintenance dose. ResultsOverall, 32 discovery samples showed extreme clopidogrel response: 16 with HTPR (PRI > 75%) and 16 with non-HTPR (PRI < 26%). Overall, 61 differential methylation loci (DMLs) were observed between the 2 groups. Most were in the open sea and intergenic regions in the genome. In the validation stage, HTPR showed a lower level of CD80_cg06300880 methylation. Carriers of rs34394661 AA genotype, a CpG-single-nucleotide polymorphism at the CD80_cg06300880 locus, showed an increased odds for HTPR (overall odds ratio of patients with ACS = 7.31, 95% CI: 1.69-31.59, P = .008; non-ST elevation myocardial infarction-ACS: odds ratio = 12.69, 95% CI: 1.68-96.08, P = .01) and decreased CD80_cg06300880 methylation (P < .0001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that both CYP2C19 poor metabolizers and CD80_rs34394661 AA (P = .009) genotype were associated with higher odds for HTPR in the overall samples. In contrast, CD80_cg06300880 methylation (P = .002) caused lower odds for HTPR in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction-ACS. ConclusionCD80_cg06300880 and CpG-single-nucleotide polymorphism rs34394661 could be independent predictors of HTPR with clopidogrel therapy.

The impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and fibrinogen levels on ischemic events in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective observational study.

After treatment, high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) is considered as an essential risk factor for recurrent ischemic events. To evaluate the impact of fibrinogen on HRPR after implantation of emergency drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and to explore the predictive values of HRPR and fibrinogen for adverse ischemic events at 12months. This single-center prospective observational study analyzed patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation DES implantation from January 2017 to December 2018. Platelet reactivity was measured by thromboelastography (TEG) at 60-72h after primary PCI. HRPR was defined as the adenosine diphosphate-induced maximum amplitude (MAADP) > 47mm. A total of 919 patients were analyzed, of which 512 (55.8%) received aspirin and clopidogrel and 406 (44.2%) received aspirin and ticagrelor. Elevated fibrinogen levels were associated with an increased prevalence of HRPR (P < 0.001). High fibrinogen (quartile IV, ≥ 410mg/dL) was an independent risk factor for HRPR after multivariate regression (odds ratio 6.556, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.200-13.431, P < 0.001). When analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR was strongly predictive for ischemic major adverse cardiac events at 12months compared to the group without HRPR and with low fibrinogen (hazard ratio 9.681, 95% CI: 4.467-20.98, log-rank P < 0.001). Similar results were confirmed in subgroups according to different dual antiplatelet therapies. A combination of high fibrinogen and HRPR may identify recurrent adverse ischemic events over 12months. Ticagrelor exhibited more potent platelet inhibition and a better prognosis than clopidogrel.

Inadequate response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with peripheral artery disease: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundPatients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are treated with preventive strategies to improve the cardiovascular risk. The incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality however remains high in PAD populations. We therefore aimed to better characterize PAD patients suffering from cardiovascular events and mortality in order to tailor preventive treatment.MethodsBetween 2018 and 2020, 246 PAD outpatients (17 newly diagnosed, 229 with known PAD) were prospectively enrolled in this observational cohort study. Patient data and blood samples were collected after inclusion, and the primary composite endpoint (myocardial infarction, elective coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, mortality) was evaluated after one year. Secondary outcomes included platelet reactivity, measured using the VerifyNow assay, and medication adherence, assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8). Logistic regression models were used to identify associations between characteristics and the occurrence of events.ResultsThe cohort comprised 207 patients with claudication and 39 with chronic limb threatening ischemia. Twenty-six (10.6%) patients suffered from an event during follow-up. Prior myocardial infarction (OR 3.3 [1.4–7.7]), prior ischemic stroke (OR 4.5 [1.8–10.9]), higher levels of creatinine (OR 5.2 [2.2–12.6]), lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (OR 4.2 [1.5–10.6]) and lower haemoglobin levels (OR 3.1 [1.3–7.1]) were associated with events. Patients with events had more often high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on aspirin (OR 5.9 [1.4–25.1]) or clopidogrel (OR 4.3 [1–19.3]). High adherence to medication was associated with the occurrence of events (OR 4.1 [1–18]).ConclusionsPatients suffering from cardiovascular events and mortality were characterized by prior cardiovascular events as compared to patients who did not experience any events. Antiplatelet therapy was not optimally protective despite high medication adherence, and HTPR was independently associated with the occurrence of events. More research is needed on alternative treatment strategies such as dual antiplatelet therapy or combinations with anticoagulant drugs.Trial registrationThe Medical Ethics Committee (METC) of the MUMC+ approved the study (NL63235.068.17) and the study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR7250).

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Patient response to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is heterogeneous, and those with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications. The aim of our study was to determine whether selecting a high-risk patient group of individuals after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would show the clinical benefit of HTPR testing for preventing thrombotic complications. Blood samples of patients after complex PCI were acquired 1 day and 1 month after the intervention. The samples were tested using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) and platelet function assay (PFA). The occurrence of clinically significant stent thrombosis with repeated revascularization of the target vessel was observed over a 1-year period. One day after PCI, 37% of patients had HTPR as established by VASP-P. One month after PCI, the percentage of patients with HTPR decreased to 30.9%. According to PFA, 1 day after PCI, 33.3% of patients had HTPR. This percentage declined to 19.8% after 1 month. All measurements identified a significantly higher proportion of HTPR in patients on clopidogrel compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Two cases of early stent thrombosis and 1 case of late stent thrombosis were identified. Further study of adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker on-treatment response in patients undergoing complex PCI is necessary.