Editing Social Psychology has been a great pleasure ever since I took over as Editor-in-Chief one year ago. The journal is prospering in many respects: We have accomplished a respectable impact factor (1.02 in 2010); we have observed a considerable increase in submissions (plus 30% in 2011); and we have provided a fast first decision to authors (in average 53 days, desk-rejections not included). Besides the formidable figures, the content of the journal in 2011 covered a wide range of topics across the full spectrum of social psychology – yet without disregarding the profoundness necessary to present significant research. A scan of last year’s publications convinced me that both breadth and depth can be achieved if authors, editors, publishers, and management smoothly collaborate on a complex enterprise like this journal. The two special issues in 2011 referred to topics as different as the limits of intentionality and spatial constraints on social cognition. Wieber and colleagues (Wieber, Gollwitzer, & Seebas, 2011) did a great job demonstrating the breadth of the field of intention by gathering work on the impact of conscious thought on action control (Epstude & Roese, 2011; McCrea & Hirt, 2011; UngerSWieber,vonSuchodoletz,Heikamp, Trommsdorff, & Gollwitzer, 2011), on the impact of conscious thought on automatic action control (Rothermund, 2011; Vogt, De Houwer, & Moors, 2011), on the impact of unconscious processes on action control (Kuhl & Quirin, 2011; Pacherie, 2011), and on the distinction between conscious and unconscious action control (von Suchodoletz & Achtziger, 2011; Schmitz, 2011). Maass and Suitner (2011, p. 161) organized their special issue on spatial constraints on social cognition around three major topics: the role of distance in the interpersonal sphere (Delevoye-Turrell, Vienne, & Coello, 2011; Henderson, Wakslak, Fujita, & Rohrbach, 2011; Matthews, & Matlock, 2011; Steidle, Werth, & Hanke, 2011), spatial metaphors of abstract concepts (Koch, Glawe, & Holt, 2011; Lakens, Semin, & Foroni, 2011; Lorenzi-Cioldi, Chatard, Marques, Selimbegovic, Konan, & Faniko, 2011; Ruscher, 2011), and the processes underlying the relationship between space and social cognition (Kadzandjian, Gaash, Love, Zivotofsky, & Chokron, 2011; Vaid, Rhodes, Tosun, & Eslami, 2011). Many of these contributions to both special issues will likely become widely cited, thus rendering the guest editors’ endeavors great successes. SocialPsychologyplans topublish further special issues.For example, in 2012 there will be a special issue on culture as process, guest edited by Markus Kemmelmeier and Ulrich Kuhnen, and another is planned for 2013 on the “Big Two” in social judgment and behavior, guest edited by Andrea Abele and Bogdan Wojciszke. In response to the high number of submissions, however, the editorial office decided to publish no more than one special issue per year in the future. The regular issues of Social Psychology in 2011 also saw a number of high-quality contributions that attest to the breadth and depth of the journal’s scope. Themes as diverse as stereotypes (Brambilla, Carnaghi, & Ravenna, 2011), organizational identification (Boros, Curseu, & Miclea, 2011), emotion regulation (Martini, 2011), group variability (Hewstone, Crisp, & Turner, 2011), approach and avoidance goals (Krajewski, Sauerland, & Muessigmann, 2011), consumption of common pool resources (Brucks & Mosler, 2011), intergroup relationships and discrimination (Adesokan, Ullrich, Dick, and Tropp, 2011; Falomir-Pichastor & Mugny, 2011; Moscatelli & Rubini, 2011), and attitudes (Smith & Nosek, 2011) were covered. My feeling is that many of these articles are of interest not only to those working on the respective topics; rather, they keep all of us up to date with the current advances in our field and provide a well-founded source of what is happening in social psychology. But the year 2011 did not only see valuable scientific contributions to the journal: Social Psychology also underwent some changes in the composition of its editorial board. Karen Douglas, Gerd Bohner, Peter Fischer, and Scott Tindale have now left the board. I would like to take the opportunity to thank them for their dedication to high-quality editing. New on the board are Juliane Degner, Margaret Shih, Gerald Echterhoff, Michael Hafner, and Christian Unkelbach. I am looking forward to collaborating with them during the second year of my term as Editor-in-Chief. Christian Unkelbach will chair the journal as Editor-in-Chief from 2013 on, and I will be happy to pass the baton to him, as I know he will do a perfect job. Lastbutnot least, Iwould like to thankthemanyotherpeople who contributed to the success of Social Psychology in 2011. The huge increase in submissions demanded a maximum of (unexpected) effort from the editorial office that was managed perfectly by Deborah Thoben. Many reviewers and guest editors also contributed their expertise and commitment. Hogrefe Publishing allocated the professional background necessary to