High Model For End-stage Liver Disease Research Articles

Improving survival in decompensated cirrhosis.

Mortality in cirrhosis is consequent of decompensation, only treatment being timely liver transplantation. Organ allocation is prioritized for the sickest patients based on Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. In order to improve survival in patients with high MELD score it is imperative to preserve them in suitable condition till transplantation. Here we examine means to prolong life in high MELD score patients till a suitable liver is available. We specially emphasize protection of airways by avoidance of sedatives, avoidance of Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure, elective intubation in grade III or higher encephalopathy, maintaining a low threshold for intubation with lesser grades of encephalopathy when undergoing upper endoscopy or colonoscopy as pre transplant evaluation or transferring patient to a transplant center. Consider post-pyloric tube feeding in encephalopathy to maintain muscle mass and minimize risk of aspiration. In non intubated and well controlled encephalopathy, frequent physical mobility by active and passive exercises are recommended. When renal replacement therapy is needed, night-time Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis may be useful in keeping the daytime free for mobility. Sparing and judicious use of steroids needs to be borne in mind in treatment of ARDS and acute hepatitis from alcohol or autoimmune process.

Epidemiology and outcome of infections in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis c virus-coinfected liver transplant recipients: A FIPSE/GESIDA Prospective Cohort Study

Information about infections unrelated to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected liver recipients is scarce. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, time of onset, and outcomes of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected orthotopic liver transplant recipients and to identify risk factors for developing severe infections. We studied 84 consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who underwent liver transplantation at 17 sites in Spain between 2002 and 2006 and were followed until December 2009. The median age was 42 years, and 76% were men. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range = 1.25-3.53 years), and 54 recipients (64%) developed at least 1 infection. Thirty-eight (45%) patients had bacterial infections, 21 (25%) had cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (2 had CMV disease), 13 (15%) had herpes simplex virus infections, and 16 (19%) had fungal infections (7 cases were invasive). Nine patients (11%) developed 10 opportunistic infections with a 44% mortality rate. Forty-three of 119 infectious episodes (36%) occurred in the first month after transplantation, and 53 (45%) occurred after the sixth month. Thirty-six patients (43%) had severe infections. Overall, 36 patients (43%) died, and the deaths were related to severe infections in 7 cases (19%). Severe infections increased the mortality rate almost 3-fold [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5-5.8]. Independent factors for severe infections included a pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >15 (HR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.70-7.1), a history of AIDS-defining events before transplantation (HR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.9-8.6), and non-tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (HR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3-4.8). In conclusion, the rates of severe and opportunistic infections are high in HIV/HCV-coinfected liver recipients and especially in those with a history of AIDS, a high MELD score, or non-tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

Orthotopic Liver Transplantation in a Multiethnic Population: Role of Spatial Accessibility

Introduction Access to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) varies among different ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to determine if distance from transplantation center (DT) impedes referral pattern and accessibility to OLT among ethnic groups. Method This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients evaluated for OLT at our center (2002–2007). The ZipCode Basic software was used to compute distance between the candidate's residence and transplantation center. Results Five hundred one patients were evaluated during the study period and there were 439 (87.6%) whites 43 (8.6%) African Americans (AA), and others (3.8%). The median DT was 36.8 miles (range, 0.5–231), and there was no significant correlation with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) at presentation ( P = .87). Although AA had a higher likelihood of residing closer to a transplantation center they were more likely to have a higher MELD at presentation (20 vs 15.4; P < .001) and less likely to be referred early to initiate OLT evaluation (11.6% vs 26.4%; P = .04). Additionally, type of insurance correlated with higher MELD at presentation. Conclusion DT was not a contributory factor to the observed access disparity in our patient population, rather the insurance type and disease severity as determined using MELD differed significantly among ethnic groups.

Der leberkranke Patient - wann und bei wem eine Lebertransplantation?

During the past two decades, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) emerged to the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease. In Switzerland, about 100 liver transplantations are performed every year, while the shortage of cadaveric organs considerably outmatches the demand. Common indications for OLT include cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease or chronic viral hepatitis related to hepatitis B or C, and hepatocellular carcinoma. With the advent of the new allocation policy in Switzerland in 2007, patients listed for OLT are mainly stratified based on the Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Using a patient's laboratory values for serum bilirubin, serum creatinin, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR), the MELD score accurately predicts three-month mortality among patients on the waiting list. Compared to the pre-MELD era, patients with significantly higher MELD scores undergo transplantation which leads in turn to more complications and higher costs yet with a comparable outcome. Timely referral of potential candidates to a transplant center is crucial since thorough evaluation to rule out contraindications such as uncontrolled infection, extrahepatic malignancy or advanced cardiopulmonary disease is essential. Taken together, every patient presenting with acute liver failure, decompensated cirrhosis or suspected hepatocellular carcinoma should be evaluated in a center with liver transplantation capability.

Cost of a quality-adjusted life year in liver transplantation: The influence of the indication and the model for end-stage liver disease score

Cost issues in liver transplantation (LT) have received increasing attention, but the cost-utility is rarely calculated. We compared costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the time of placement on the LT waiting list to 1 year after transplantation for 252 LT patients and to 5 years after transplantation for 81 patients. We performed separate calculations for chronic liver disease (CLD), acute liver failure (ALF), and different Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. For the estimation of QALYs, the health-related quality of life was measured with the 15D instrument. The median costs and QALYs after LT were €141,768 and 0.895 for 1 year and €177,618 and 3.960 for 5 years, respectively. The costs of the first year were 80% of the 5-year costs. The main cost during years 2 to 5 was immunosuppression drugs (59% of the annual costs). The cost/QALY ratio improved from €158,400/QALY at 1 year to €44,854/QALY at 5 years, and the ratio was more beneficial for CLD patients (€42,500/QALY) versus ALF patients (€63,957/QALY) and for patients with low MELD scores versus patients with high MELD scores. Although patients with CLD and MELD scores > 25 demonstrated markedly higher 5-year costs (€228,434) than patients with MELD scores < 15 (€169,541), the cost/QALY difference was less pronounced (€59,894/QALY and €41,769/QALY, respectively). The cost/QALY ratio for LT appears favorable, but it is dependent on the assessed time period and the severity of the liver disease.

Prospective Study Comparing Different Indirect Methods to Measure Portal Pressure

Purpose To compare the accuracy of wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP) measurement with use of an end-hole catheter or an occlusion-balloon catheter versus direct portal pressure (PP) measurement in patients with cirrhosis with sinusoidal portal hypertension and to investigate the factors that affect the results of these indirect measurements. Materials and Methods In a cohort of 174 patients with cirrhosis referred for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, indirect PP was measured with an end-hole catheter and an occlusion-balloon catheter placed in the right hepatic vein. Direct PP was measured by a pigtail catheter in the main branch of the portal vein. Results PP was more accurately estimated by the occlusion-balloon technique: mean WHVP measurements were 25.5 mm Hg ± 7.9 and 30.6 mm Hg ± 13.9, respectively, for the occlusion-balloon and end-hole catheter techniques, and the direct PP measurement was 25.0 mm Hg ± 7.0. The median absolute differences between direct and the indirect methods were 6.0 mm Hg with the end-hole catheter and 2.0 mm Hg with the occlusion-balloon catheter ( P < .0001, signed-rank test). Relative to direct PP measurements, the occlusion-balloon technique overestimated pressures in cases of higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (Spearman ρ = −0.24; P = .0005). Conclusions Compared with direct PP measurements, agreement was clearly higher for indirect WHVP measurement with occlusion-balloon catheters versus end-hole catheters. However, in patients with a high MELD score, there was an overestimation of PP with the occlusion-balloon method.

Does the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predict Transfusion Amount, Acid-Base Imbalance, Haemodynamic and Oxidative Abnormalities during Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is associated with the severity of liver failure in transplant patients. This study examined whether life-threatening stress factors during liver transplantation differed according to the patients' preoperative MELD scores. Forty-four patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation were divided into a high MELD group (MELD score ≥ 20) (n = 25) and a low MELD group (MELD score < 20) (n = 19). The volume of blood components transfused, acid-base homeostasis variables, and haemodynamic and oxidative variables were measured at each stage of the surgery. The systemic vascular resistance index was significantly lower in the high MELD group than in the low MELD group at all time points. The oxygen utility index and the oxygen extraction ratio were all significantly lower in the high MELD group than in the low MELD group only at the preanhepatic stage and not at later stages of surgery. Intraoperative transfusion volume and the severity of metabolic acidosis were not associated with the preoperative MELD score.

Model for end-stage liver disease exceptions in the context of the french model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score-based allocation systems have been adopted by most countries in Europe and North America. Indeed, the MELD score is a robust marker of early mortality for patients with cirrhosis. Except for extreme values, high pretransplant MELD scores do not significantly affect posttransplant survival. The MELD score can be used to optimize the allocation of allografts according to a sickest first policy. Most often, patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and low MELD scores receive extra points, which allow them appropriate access to transplantation comparable to the access of patients with advanced cirrhosis and high MELD scores. In addition to patients with advanced cirrhosis and HCC, patients with a number of relatively uncommon conditions have low MELD scores and a poor prognosis in the short term without transplantation but derive excellent benefits from transplantation. These conditions, which correspond to the so-called MELD score exceptions, justify the allocation of a specific score for appropriate access to transplantation. Here we report the conclusions of the French consensus meeting. The goals of this meeting were (1) to identify which conditions merit MELD score exceptions, (2) to list the criteria needed for defining each of these conditions, and (3) to define a reasonable time interval for organ allocation for each MELD exception in the general context of organ shortages. MELD exceptions were discussed in an attempt to reconcile the concepts of transparency, equity, justice, and utility.

The Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients with Combined Severe Acute Liver and Kidney Injury Secondary to Paracetamol Toxicity Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy

There is a paucity of outcome data for critically ill patients with combined acute liver and kidney injury secondary to paracetamol overdose (POD) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). We retrospectively reviewed all admissions over a 6-year period to the intensive care unit (ICU) at a university teaching hospital which supports an active liver transplant program. Of the 5582 admissions over this period, 73 patients were admitted with combined liver and kidney injury requiring RRT, and of these 10 patients went on to receive a liver transplant. Overall mortality was 58%, being lower at 20% for transplant recipients. Transplant recipients were younger than non-transplanted patients with similar global disease severity scores [Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)]. Patients with a higher MELD or APACHE II score fared worse and patients fulfilling the King’s College Hospital transplant criteria on admission had an odds ratio (OR) for death of 3.8 (1.3–10.6). Logistic regression modeling found that only a higher admission bilirubin OR 1.6 (1.1–2.3) mg/dL and a lower creatinine OR 0.52 (0.3–0.9) mg/dL were predictive of mortality. Of the ICU survivors, 41% remained RRT dependant at the time of ICU discharge; all regained independent renal function by 1 month. Combined severe acute liver and kidney injury secondary to POD requiring RRT is associated with a high mortality. The majority of survivors recover independent kidney function by 1 month. Standard disease severity scores appear to reflect prognosis in these patients.

Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Transplant Rates in the United States

We sought to characterize sex-based differences in access to deceased donor liver transplantation. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were used to analyze n = 78 998 adult candidates listed before (8/1997-2/2002) or after (2/2002-2/2007) implementation of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based liver allocation. The primary outcome was deceased donor liver transplantation. Cox regression was used to estimate covariate-adjusted differences in transplant rates by sex. Females represented 38% of listed patients in the pre-MELD era and 35% in the MELD era. Females had significantly lower covariate-adjusted transplant rates in the pre-MELD era (by 9%; p < 0.0001) and in the MELD era (by 14%; p < 0.0001). In the MELD era, the disparity in transplant rate for females increased as waiting list mortality risk increased, particularly for MELD scores ≥15. Substantial geographic variation in sex-based differences in transplant rates was observed. Some areas of the United States had more than a 30% lower covariate-adjusted transplant rate for females compared to males in the MELD era. In conclusion, the disparity in liver transplant rates between females and males has increased in the MELD era. It is especially troubling that the disparity is magnified among patients with high MELD scores and in certain regions of the United States.

Combined Liver Kidney Transplantation: Critical Analysis of a Single-Center Experience

Combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) can be successfully performed on patients with liver and renal failure; however, outcomes are inferior to liver transplantation alone (OLT). Our aim was to determine the indications for and outcome of LKT and whether patients with longer wait times required more frequent LKT versus OLT alone. We included 18/93 adults who underwent LKT from August 2007 to August 2010 for hepatitis C virus (HCV, n = 7), alcohol ( n = 5), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis ( n = 2), primary biliary sclerosis, polycystic kidney disease with liver involvement, hepatic adenomatosis, and ischemic hepatitis. Eleven were originally listed for LKT and 7 required listing for-kidney transplantation while awaiting OLT. Eight were on dialysis when first listed and 10 had a low glomerular filtration rate or known kidney disease. The mean calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for LKT was 31.2 ± 3.54. Seven had hepatocellular carcinoma in explants. Two patients had acute cellular kidney rejection that responded to treatment. Recurrence of HCV was documented in 5 patients within 6 months of LKT; 2/5 received HCV therapy (interferon and ribavirin) without renal allograft rejection. One-year liver graft/patient survival was 94% after LKT. One patient died at 6 months post LKT due to severe HCV recurrence. Last mean serum creatinine level was 1.35 ± 0.28 mg/dL for LKT patients. LKT is a safe procedure with favorable outcomes even in patients with a high MELD score. Transplantation of patients with a high MELD score due to regional variations in organ allocation results in additional use of kidneys by OLT patients. Improved organ allocation algorithms in OLT would help to reduce combined transplants, sparing more kidneys.

Liver transplantation in the high MELD era: a fair chance for everyone?

In 2006, the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was introduced in Germany. Recent data clearly show a decrease of mortality on the waiting list but also a decrease of post-liver transplant survival. Several factors are discussed to be responsible for that; although, a MELD >30 is known to be major risk factor for outcome, MELD scores have increased to over 30 since introduction of the MELD system. On the other hand, the quality of donor organs is deteriorating from year to year at the same time. To date, we have to face the dilemma of organ allocation to significantly sicker patients resulting in a noticeably worsening of post-orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) results. The question is how to keep an acceptable standard of post-OLT results. Should allocation guidelines be modified? A further significant question is: How fair is the current allocation system for patients on the waiting list? Does the MELD score privileges or discriminates potential organ recipients?

Risk factors for mortality in cirrhotic patients with sepsis

Patients with cirrhosis and sepsis had increased mortality. Determine factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted for sepsis. All cirrhotic patients admitted from 2004 to 2007 for sepsis were identified from hospital electronic database. Patients were included if they had liver cirrhosis and sepsis, defined as identified sources of infection, and at least one of fever, altered total white cell count, or raised C-reactive protein. Baseline characteristics, investigations, infections, and outcomes were collected. Main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. A total of 205 admissions in 153 patients were included. In-hospital mortality rate was 24.4%. In predicting in-hospital death, area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for Child-Pugh score was 0.934, with optimum cut-off at 10 and above, while for model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 0.751, with optimum cut-off at 17 and above. Four factors were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis: presence of >1 site of infection, pneumonia, Child's C status, and MELD score 17 and above. In-hospital mortality rate increased with more factors: 0% with no factor, 7% with one factor, 21% with two factors, 87% with three factors, and 100% with four factors. The mortality of those with <3 risk factors was significantly lower than those with three or more risk factors (7 vs. 91%, p=0.000). Septic cirrhotic patients with pneumonia, >1 site of infection, Child's C cirrhosis, and high MELD score had a high mortality risk.

Outcome predictors of cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial empyema

Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) is a complication of cirrhotic patients in which a pre-existing pleural effusion becomes infected. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the bacteriology and outcome predictors of SBE in cirrhotic patients. Medical records of cirrhotic patients treated in a tertiary care university hospital from December 2004 to December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 3390 cirrhotic patients seen during the study period, 81 cases of SBE were diagnosed. The incidence of SBE was 2.4% (81/3390) in cirrhotic patients and 16% (81/508) in patients with cirrhosis with hydrothorax. There were 46 monomicrobial infections found in 46 SBE patients. Aerobic Gram-negative organisms were the predominant pathogens (n=29, 63%), and Escherichia coli (n=9, 20%) was the most frequently isolated sole pathogen. The mortality rate of SBE was 38% (31/81). Univariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)-Na score, concomitant bacteraemia, concomitant spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission and initial antibiotic treatment failure were predictors of poor outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the independent factors related to a poor outcome were initial ICU admission [odds ratio (OR): 4.318; 95% confidence interval 1CI) 1.09-17.03; P=0.037], MELD-Na score (OR: 1.267; 95% CI 1.08-1.49; P=0.004) and initial antibiotic treatment failure (OR: 13.10; 95% CI 2.60-66.03). Spontaneous bacterial empyema in cirrhotic patients is a high mortality complication. The independent factors related to poor outcome are high MELD-Na score, initial ICU admission and initial antibiotic treatment failure. High MELD-Na score may be a useful mortality predictor of SBE in cirrhotic patients.

In-hospital mortality among a cohort of cirrhotic patients admitted to a Tertiary Hospital

Background/Aim:To determine the mortality rate in a cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and examine their resuscitation status at admission.Materials and Methods:A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with cirrhosis who were admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2009.Results:We reviewed 226 cirrhotic patients during the study period. The hospital mortality rate was 35%. A univariate analysis revealed that worse outcomes were seen in patients with advanced age or who had worse child-turcotte-pugh (CPT) scores, worse model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, low albumin and high serum creatinine. Using a multivariate analysis, we found that advanced age (P=0.004) and high MELD (P=0.001) scores were independent risk factors for the mortality of cirrhotic patients. The end-of-life decision were made in 34% of cirrhotic patients, and the majority of deceased patients were “no resuscitation” status (90% vs. 4%, P<0.001).Conclusions:The relatively high mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted for care in a tertiary hospital, Saudi Arabia was comparable to that reported in the literature. Furthermore, end-of-life discussions should be addressed early in the hospitalization of cirrhotic patients.

Aktuelle Entwicklungen der Lebertransplantation in Deutschland: MELD-basierte Organallokation und „incentives” für Transplantationszentren

Liver transplantation represents a successful and well-established therapeutic concept for patients with advanced liver diseases. Organ donor shortage continues to pose a significant problem. To ensure fair and transparent allocation of too few post-mortem grafts, the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based allocation was implemented in December 2006. This has decreased waiting list mortality from 20 to 10 % but at the same time has reduced post OLT survival (1-year survival from almost 90% to below 80%), which is largely due to patients with a labMELD score > 30. Following MELD introduction the regular allocation threshold has increased from a matchMELD of initially 25 to meanwhile 34. At the same time the quality of donor organs has seen a continuous deterioration over the last 10 - 15 years: 63% of organs are "suboptimal" with a donor risk index of > 1.5. Moreover, the numbers of living-related liver transplantations have decreased. In Germany incentives for transplant centres are inappropriate: patients with decompensated cirrhosis, high MELD scores and high post-transplant mortality as well as marginal liver grafts are accepted for transplantation without the necessary consideration of outcomes, and against a background of the still absent publication and transparency of outcome results. The outlined development calls for measures for improvement: (i) the increase of donor grafts (e. g., living donation, opt-out solutions, non-heart beating donors), (ii) the elimination of inappropriate incentives for transplant centres, (iii) changes of allocation guidelines, that take the current situation and suboptimal donor grafts into account, and (iv) the systematic and complete collection of transplant-related data in order to allow for the development of improved prognostic scores.

Six-minute walk distance predicts mortality in liver transplant candidates

The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) is a simple test measuring global physical function. It is commonly used to predict mortality in patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases, but it is also useful in assessing the functional status of patients with a variety of other medical conditions. We sought to determine (1) the characteristics of the 6MWD in patients listed for liver transplantation (LT), (2) the existence of a relationship between the 6MWD and the quality of life, and (3) the relationship between the 6MWD and survival in LT candidates. The 6MWD was prospectively measured in all patients listed for LT. The 6MWD was determined when the listed Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was ≥ 15. Patients were followed until LT, death, removal from the wait list, or the end of the study period. Quality of life was assessed with the Short Form 36 (SF-36). In 121 patients, the mean 6MWD was 369 ± 122 m; it was not related to age, height, weight, body mass index, albumin level, or etiology of liver disease and showed a moderate correlation with the physical component score (PCS) on the SF-36 (r = 0.4) and a moderate inverse correlation with the native MELD score (r = -0.61). In an unadjusted analysis, a high native MELD score, a low 6MWD, and a low PCS were associated with mortality, with only the 6MWD retaining significance after adjustment for covariates. Each 100-m increase in the 6MWD was significantly associated with increased survival (hazard ratio = 0.48, P = 0.0001), with 6MWD < 250 m being associated with an increased risk of death (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, the 6MWD is significantly reduced in patients awaiting LT and is inversely correlated with the native MELD score. A pretransplant 6MWD < 250 m is a risk for death on the wait list.

BNP as marker of heart dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis

Patients with liver cirrhosis suffer various degrees of cardiac dysfunction which may be crucial in determining the outcome of surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the role of natriuretic peptides on the assessment of cardiac dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis. Prospective longitudinal study of 30 patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Severity of disease was assessed according to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Cardiac function was assessed using endocrine markers [atrial natriuretic peptide-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)] and isotopic ventriculography at baseline and after stimulation with dobutamine. The ejection fraction was higher in patients with Child A+B and MELD less than 18 than in patients with advanced liver disease. A significant correlation between BNP plasma levels and MELD values was observed. Dobutamine induced a marked improvement in myocardial performance associated to a decrease in BNP levels. Multivariate analysis showed that BNP has prognostic value as a marker of cardiac ejection fraction. Patients whose baseline BNP concentrations were more than 70 pg/ml had an ejection fraction of around 45%. This study has shown that increased baseline BNP concentrations may be regarded together with high Child and MELD scores, as the critical cardiac dysfunction threshold in cirrhotic patients.

Factors Influencing the Concentration of Cytokines During Liver Transplantation

Not only does the underlying disease that requires surgery constitute a significant stress to the human body, but also the surgery itself serves as a stressor. Cytokine secretion is activated in response to the surgical stress during liver transplantation. We examined 44 patients to compare cytokine levels, according to the underlying diseases causing liver failure (viral hepatitis vs alcoholic hepatitis), examining whether the values differed according to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score [high (≥20) vs low (<20)]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)1β, and IL-6 and anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 were quantified using sandwich enzyme- linked immunoassays at three times: (1) after inducing anesthesia, (2) 60 minutes after the start of the anhepatic period, and (3) 60 minutes after reperfusion. No difference in the level of any cytokine measured in our study was detected at any time point between the viral and the alcoholic hepatitis groups. Among the high MELD group, IL-1β and IL-4 contents were higher than in the low MELD group at all time points ( P < .05). IL-10 concentrations at time 1 and TNF-α at time 2 were higher among the high MELD group ( P < .05). In conclusion, the severity of the inflammatory and stress reactions expressed as cytokine concentrations did not differ according to the underlying liver disease, but did associate with the MELD score.

Does Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predict the Short-Term Outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for short-term outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Patients and Methods The 135 consecutive patients who underwent LDLT did not include prisoners or their organs. Patients were divided into a low (group A; MELD score <15), a moderate (group B; MELD score ≥15 but <25), and a high MELD score (group C; MELD score ≥25) group according to their preoperative score. We retrospectively analyzed the data concerning complications, biochemical parameters, and survival over 90 postoperative days. Results Complications were similar among patients with a low, moderate, or high MELD score. The 90-day survival rates of group A, B, and C were 88%, 90%, and 90%, respectively ( P = .960). Compared with groups A and B, group C showed a longer mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Conclusion Preoperative MELD score may not help to predict short-term outcomes of LDLT. However, a high MELD score may be related to a prolonged ICU stay.