THE CENTRAL TENETS OF CANCER STAGING ARE accuracy, prognostic significance, and therapeutic implications. For solid tumors, accurate cancer staging is highly dependent on the evaluation of sufficient numbers of regional lymph nodes to ensure that positive nodes, if present, will be detected. Positive nodes are markers for disease spread and therefore for patients with a higher risk of recurrence and metastatic disease. Staging influences treatment decisions because adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with positive lymph node findings has been shown to be efficacious in improving disease-free and overall survival. Observational studies have suggested that very thorough lymph node searches are warranted because of this relationship between lymph node positivity, the subsequent decision to administer chemotherapy, and improved survival. Consequently, retrieval and examination of at least 12 lymph nodes during colon cancer resection has been established as a quality indicator for colon cancer care. With increasing demand for higher-quality cancer ca re , qua l i t y ind i ca to r s se rve a s benchmarks by which physicians, payers, and policy makers can measure and improve processes of care and patient outcomes. However, several recent reports could not link high-profile surgical performance measures with intended improvements in outcomes. For instance, improved adherence to the Surgical Care Improvement Project infection prevention measures at US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals was not associated with lower surgical site infection rates at the patient and hospital levels. In another VA hospital–based study, investigators found deleterious effects from implementation of evidence-based processes of care. Adherence to a “bundle” of best practices for prevention paradoxically led to a 2.5-fold higher risk of superficial skin infection compared with standard practices. Adherence to quality indicators may not improve patient outcomes and, in fact, may result in unintended harm. In this issue of JAMA, Parsons and colleagues report on the association between lymph node counts for colon cancer, node positivity, and cancer survival. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the authors examined the relationship between the increasing number of lymph nodes evaluated and findings of node positivity following resection for colon cancer. Over a 20-year period, there has been a significant increase in the proportion of patients with at least 12 lymph nodes evaluated. During 1988-1990, 35% of patients had 12 or more nodes examined per specimen, with an increase to 74% by 2006-2008. The total lymph node count also increased with time, with 20 or more nodes evaluated in 12% of patients in 1988-1990 and in 34% of patients at the end of the study period. Despite searching for and finding many more lymph nodes in resected colon specimens, the proportion of patients with node-positive cancers during this time was unchanged, ranging from 40% to 42%. Although there was no significant association between higher numbers of nodes examined and detection of more node-positive cancers, higher lymph node counts were significantly associated with improved survival. A previous SEER study of a cohort of patients with colon and rectal cancer demonstrated a trend of increasing lymph node counts, with the overall rate of more than 12 lymph nodes counted increasing from 32% among patients in 1988 to 44% in 2001. The current study by Parsons et al extends this analysis and demonstrates a continued increase in lymph node retrieval with time. The secular increase in number of lymph nodes examined likely resulted from the perception that exami-
Read full abstract