Reviewed by: Spiritual Subjects: Central Asian Pilgrims and the Ottoman Hajj at the End of Empire by Lâle Can Eren Tasar Lâle Can. Spiritual Subjects: Central Asian Pilgrims and the Ottoman Hajj at the End of Empire. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2020. Xiv + 257 pp. Paper, $25.00. ISBN: 978-1503611160 This elegant monograph marks a welcome addition to an increasingly sophisticated literature on the hajj during the era of high imperialism, that includes recent contributions by Eileen Kane, Christopher Low, John Slight, and Umar Ryad. Spiritual Subjects shares with these important works a focus on the hajj’s [End Page 358] instrumentalization by empires: Can highlights Ottoman participation in this expanding sphere of geopolitics, with a focus on the Porte’s encounter with the British and the Russians. She opens entirely new avenues of inquiry, however, by shifting our gaze toward everyday life and religion. The author fulfills her stated objective of writing a book about “ordinary people” (p. 31) that brings religion “back into analysis of hajj,” (p. 33) in large part by devoting substantial attention to reconstructing the lived reality of pilgrimage for Bukharans, Kashgaris, and other Central Asian Muslims: “Although networks are often invoked in studies of transimperial mobility and pilgrimage, historians seldom elaborate on just how they work.” One of the book’s achievements is that it offers a window into “the nature of the webs of connection and circulation, the people who animated them, [and] how they operated on a day-to-day level.” (p. 77) At the outset, the author presents hajjis as living, breathing people, by qualifying the imagery of a “decadent” fin-de-siècle Constantinople that served as a kind of Islamic analogue to Silver Age Petersburg, later popularized in novels such as Murder on the Orient Express and Kurt Seyt & Murka: a European metropolis of high-end boutiques and chamber music recitals. The author introduces the reader to a Turkestani hajji named Mirim Khan stating, “The Istanbul that Mirim Khan describes was one that many contemporary travelers and flaneurs of the upper classes would not recognize.” Instead, “in his telling it was a fundamentally Sunni Muslim space” (p. 37). Taking a cue from Mozart, Can dissects Mirim’s memoir with a view to what is being left out: “Some of the work Mirim Khan did to Islamicize Istanbul was achieved via silences” (p. 51). While happy to provide detail on the boorishness of other Central Asian pilgrims, he had little or nothing to say about the city’s large foreign and Christian populations, let alone its over-the-top cosmopolitanism. Instead, Mirim’s Istanbul presents “a point of reentry into a shared world of mosques, pan-Islamic power, shrine visitation, and relics from the Prophet” (p. 51). The upshot is that “despite being a Russian national and legal subject, he felt that he was a foreigner in most of Russia but described feeling at home and among equals in Ottoman Mecca” (p. 63). In the figure of Mirim Khan, Can illustrates the agency pilgrims enjoyed in seeing the world of the hajj on their own terms. Pilgrims such as Mirim had axes to grind, yet the results rarely inspire. Like the era’s empires, many found in the hajj more worldly opportunities. In Chapter 3, we meet a crafty Bukharan named Celal bin Hekim. After leaving his homeland in the 1860s, he settled in Jeddah and made a living helping clients avoid conscription. Perhaps sensing trouble on the horizon, Can suggests, he traveled to Istanbul in 1890 to register at the Russian Consulate. When he was arrested “for a matter involving a slave” the following year, [End Page 359] Celal claimed exemption from Ottoman law as a Russian subject. This was patent nonsense, since the Bukharan Emirate was at the time a protectorate of the Russian Empire, and its inhabitants were not Russian citizens—that Tsarist officials were “loath to recognize Bukharans as Russian nationals in the metropole-did not deter them from ignoring these differences when the subjects in question were in Ottoman lands” (p. 101). Thus, the British and Russian Empires increasingly viewed non-Ottoman hajjis as “unlikely agents of expanding European jurisdiction” (p...
Read full abstract