High-dose UVA1 Therapy Research Articles

Ultraviolet A1 Phototherapy of Mycosis Fungoides

Ultraviolet A1 Phototherapy of Mycosis Fungoides

Update on the immunology of UV and visible radiation therapy: phototherapy, photochemotherapy and photodynamic therapy

Over the last few years, one of the major highlights in phototherapy is demonstrating the effects of UV-induced immunosuppression, which have led to greater understanding of the mechanisms and principles of photoimmunology and its therapeutic relevance. Various types of phototherapy have been used in the treatment of different dermatologic conditions. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the immunology of narrowband UVB phototherapy, high-dose UVA1 therapy, photochemotherapy, which includes psoralen plus UVA and extracorporeal photopheresis, and photodynamic therapy.

Efficacy of UVA1 phototherapy in 230 patients with various skin diseases

Investigation of the efficacy of ultraviolet (UV) A1 phototherapy on atopic eczema, scleroderma, granuloma annulare, urticaria pigmentosa, prurigo nodularis, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, T-cell lymphoma, keratosis lichenoides chronica, chronic urticaria and some rare, sclerosing skin diseases. The data of 230 patients treated with low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose UVA1 therapy during 6 years were retrospectively analysed. The mean single dose (J/cm(2)), the mean number of irradiations and the mean total dose (J/cm(2)) were evaluated. The efficacy of phototherapy was assessed by a grading scale and the number of patients was given in percentage for each group. Good therapeutic effects of UVA1 therapy were shown in patients with atopic eczema, scleroderma, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, keratosis lichenoides chronica, prurigo nodularis and with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Positive effects in some patients were seen in the urticaria pigmentosa and granuloma annulare group, no change to slight improvement was seen in most of the patients with rare, sclerosing skin diseases and no effect was seen in the chronic urticaria group. Besides topical and systemic therapy, UVA1 radiation is a good option of treatment in various skin diseases. It is one of the first-line treatments for several sclerotic diseases and it often improves pruritus considerably.

Can dietary furanocoumarin ingestion enhance the erythemal response during high-dose UVA1 therapy?

As phototoxic skin reactions caused by psoralen are induced by wavelengths within the UVA1 spectrum, we assessed the potential of the small amount of psoralen in a normal diet to provoke phototoxicity in volunteers with skin types I and II. Threshold erythema was unaffected by ingestion of a 200-g portion of parsnip.

Can St John's wort (hypericin) ingestion enhance the erythemal response during high-dose ultraviolet A1 therapy?

St John's wort (SJW) is widely used as a treatment for depression. A phototoxic reaction, due to its content of hypericin, can occur in animals and in cell culture, and has been reported in humans. Hypericin displays absorption within the ultraviolet (UV) A1 spectrum and there may therefore be a potential for phototoxicity if taken during high-dose UVA1 therapy. To assess the phototoxicity risk of SJW ingestion. Eleven adult volunteers of skin types I and II were exposed to a geometric dose series of UVA1 irradiation from a high-output source (Dermalight Ultra 1; Dr Hönle, Martinsreid, Germany; irradiance 70-77 mW cm(-2)) on the photoprotected lower back skin at eight 1.5-cm(2) test areas. Irradiation was carried out at baseline and after 10 days of SJW extract 1020 mg (equivalent to 3000 microg of hypericin) daily. Four, 8, 24 and 48 h after each exposure, the minimal erythema dose (MED) and the presence or absence of pigmentation were recorded visually and erythema was assessed objectively with an erythema meter. The median MED and D(0.025), an objective measure of MED, were lower at all time-points after SJW ingestion. The visual erythemal peak (lowest median MED), which was seen at 8 h postirradiation, was lower after SJW (median 14 J cm(-2), range 10-56) than at baseline (median 20 J cm(-2), range 14-56) (P = 0.047). Similarly, the median D(0.025) at 8 h postirradiation was lower after SJW (median 22.0 J cm(-2), range 15.2-53.9) than at baseline (median 33.7 J cm(-2), range 22.9-136.0) (P = 0.014). The MED and D(0.025) were also significantly different at the 48-h and 4-h time-points, respectively. Significance was not reached at the 24-h time-point. Median intensity of postirradiation erythema increased at all time-points after ingestion of SJW. Despite these differences, the maximum slope of the dose-response curve was not increased after SJW ingestion. These data suggest that SJW extract has the potential to lower the erythemal threshold to UVA1 irradiation in a significant proportion of individuals and highlight the importance of ascertaining a full drug history, including herbal remedies, before initiating UVA1 phototherapy.

Photogenotoxicity of hypericin in HaCaT keratinocytes: Implications for St. John's Wort supplements and high dose UVA-1 therapy

Extract of St. John's Wort ( Hypericum perforatum) is commonly used as natural remedy for treatment of mild to moderate depression. However, it contains a powerful photoactive component, hypericin, which can cause a severe photodermatitis when eaten by grazing animals (hypericism). In humans, there is evidence that supplementation with St. John's Wort can reduce the minimal erythemal dose (MED) in patients undergoing high dose UVA-1 phototherapy. This is a recent development in phototherapy where the most erythemogenic parts of the UVA spectrum are filtered out, allowing delivery of higher doses of the longer wavelengths of UVA. Although current published evidence suggests that the plasma levels of hypericin are unlikely to cause clinical phototoxicity, it has been established that photoactive compounds can cause DNA damage at sub-toxic and sub-erythemal doses, the effects of which might not be apparent for many years after the event. The present study used HaCaT keratinocytes to investigate the photoclastogenic ability of hypericin on irradiation with UVA. The results show that although the combination of hypericin and UVA light increased the genotoxic burden, when all factors are taken into account, the risk of significant photogenotoxic damage incurred by the combination of Hypericum extracts and UVA phototherapy may be low in the majority of individuals.

Mechanisms of ultraviolet (UV) B and UVA phototherapy.

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation has been used for decades with great success and at a constantly increasing rate in the management of skin diseases, becoming an essential part of modern dermatologic therapy (Krutmann et al, 1999). For phototherapy, irradiation devices emitting either predominantly middlewave UV (UVB, 290-315 nm) or longwave UV (UVA, 315-400 nm) radiation are employed. In former years, patients were treated with broad-band UVB, broad-band UVA, or combination regimens. Broad-band UV phototherapy, however, is being replaced more frequently by the use of irradiation devices that allow treatment of patients' skin with selected emission spectra. Two such modalities which have their origin in European Photodermatology are 311 nm UVB phototherapy (which uses long-wave UVB radiation above 300 nm rather than broadband UVB) and high-dose UVA1 therapy (which selective employs long-wave UVA radiation above 340 nm). In Europe, 311 nm UVB phototherapy has almost replaced classical broad-band UVB phototherapy and has significantly improved therapeutic efficacy and safety of UVB phototherapy (van Welden et al, 1988; Krutmann et al, 1999). The constantly increasing use of UVA-1 phototherapy has not only improved UVA phototherapy for established indications such as atopic dermatitis (Krutmann et al, 1992a, 1998; Krutmann, 1996), but has also provided dermatologists with the opportunity to successfully treat previously untractable skin diseases, e.g., connective tissue diseases (Stege et al, 1997; Krutmann, 1997). These clinical developments have stimulated studies about the mechanisms by which UVB and UVA phototherapy work. The knowledge obtained from this work is an indispensable prerequisite to make treatment decisions on a rationale rather than an empirical basis. Modern dermatologic phototherapy has started to profit from this knowledge, and it is very likely that this development will continue and provide dermatologists with improved phototherapeutic modalities and regimens for established and new indications. This review aims to provide an overview about current concepts of the mode of action of dermatologic phototherapy. Special emphasis will be given on studies that have identified previously unrecognized immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory principles of UV phototherapy.

High-dose UVA1 therapy for atopic dermatitis: Results of a multicenter trial

Background: The results of an open, single-center study suggested that phototherapy with high doses of UVA1 radiation (UVA1R; 340-400 nm) is effective for acute, severe exacerbations of atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of high-dose UVA1 phototherapy for acute, severe AD in a randomized multicenter trial in direct comparison with topical glucocorticoid therapy. Methods: Patients were treated with high-dose UVA1R (10 days, 130 J/cm 2 /day; n = 20), topically with fluocortolone (10 days, 1 x daily; n = 17), or with UVA-UVB therapy (10 days, 1 x daily, minimal erythema dose–dependent; n = 16). Results: With a clinical scoring system, significant differences in favor of high-dose UVA1R and fluocortolone therapy were observed ( p < 0.0001), as compared with UVA-UVB therapy. At day 10, high-dose UVA1R was superior to fluocortolone ( p < 0.002) therapy. Serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein and the blood eosinophil count were significantly reduced after high-dose UVA1 or fluocortolone, but not UVA-UVB therapy. Conclusion: This study confirms the therapeutic effectiveness of high-dose UVA1 monotherapy for treatment of severe exacerbations of AD. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:589-93.)

High-dose UVA 1 radiation therapy for localized scleroderma

Fibrotic skin lesions in patients with localized scleroderma can cause muscle atrophy, disfigurement, and flexion contractures. There is no effective therapy for this disease. Skin fibrosis is thought to be caused by decreased collagenase activity. Collagenase activity can be induced in dermal fibroblasts by UVA1 irradiation. Our purpose was to assess whether UVA1 radiation therapy is effective for patients with localized scleroderma. Patients with localized scleroderma (n = 17) were exposed 30 times to 130 J/cm2 UVA1 (high-dose UVA1 therapy; n = 10) or 20 J/cm2 UVA1 (low-dose UVA1 therapy; n = 7). Therapeutic effectiveness was assessed by evaluation of (1) clinical features, (2) thickness of sclerotic plaques, and (3) cutaneous elastometry. Sequential biopsy specimens from treated lesions were analyzed for collagenase I messenger RNA (mRNA) expression by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. In all patients, high-dose UVA1 therapy softened sclerotic plaques, and complete clearance was observed in four of 10 patients. High-dose UVA1 therapy significantly reduced thickness and increased elasticity of plaques. These changes could not be detected in unirradiated control plaques and were still present in 9 of 10 patients 3 months after cessation of therapy. For all factors assessed, high-dose UVA1 was superior to low-dose UVA1 therapy (p = 0.001). High-dose UVA1 therapy increased collagenase I mRNA expression about 20-fold in treated plaques. High-dose UVA1 therapy is effective in the treatment of localized scleroderma. Effectiveness is UVA1 dose dependent and is associated with induction of collagenase I expression.

Characterization of nonresponders in high dosage UVA1 therapy of acute exacerbated atopic dermatitis

High-dose UVA1 therapy is an effective treatment of patients with acute atopic dermatitis. However, some patients do not respond well to this new therapy. We attempted to further characterize the non-responder population in a retrospective study. Two closely matched groups of responders (n = 20) and non-responders (n = 20) were compared. No significant differences were observed between both groups with respect to the following parameters: skin type, minimal erythema dose, single and cumulative doses of UVA1, and peripheral blood eosinophils. However, non-responders were characterized by a highly elevated atopic score, and by high levels of total IgE and of specific IgE. Furthermore, colonization of the skin with Staphylococcus aureus occurred at higher densities, and intestinal growth of Candida albicans was more frequently observed. These data indicate that high-dose UVA1 irradiation is not effective in all patients suffering from atopic dermatitis. We conclude that non-responders with complicating infections might benefit from the combination of high-dose UVA1 therapy and antibiotic or antimycotic treatment.

High-dose UVA1 therapy in the treatment of patients with localized scleroderma

High-dose UVA1 therapy in the treatment of patients with localized scleroderma

Studies on the effects of a high dose UVA-1 radiation therapy on surface markers and function of epidermal Langerhans cells.

Recently, high-dose UVA-1 therapy (340-400 nm) was introduced as an effective treatment of severe exacerbated atopic dermatitis. Since the target of this type of radiation in the skin is not known we investigated using the mouse model whether surface markers of the antigen-presenting function of epidermal Langerhans cells are affected by UVA-1 radiation. Even repeated high doses of UVA-1 radiation (up to 50 J/cm2) had no detectable effect on surface ATPase activity and Ia antigen expression on Langerhans cells. Also, the contact allergen oxazolone was presented normally in skin treated with UVA-1 radiation. In contrast, if the mice were injected 1 h before irradiation with 8-methoxypsoralen a dramatic reduction in ATPase activity and Ia antigen expression on Langerhans cells was observed and the induction of contact sensitivity was suppressed (PUVA effect). These results show that epidermal Langerhans cells are not impaired either in structure or function and that these cells probably do not represent the primary target of UVA-1 radiation in the skin. No side effects resulting from a diminished Langerhans cell function should result from high-dose UVA-1 therapy.

High-dose UVA1 therapy in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis

Besides glucocorticosteroids, there is currently no known effective therapy for patients with acute atopic dermatitis. The therapeutic effectiveness of high-dose UVA1 irradiation in the management of patients with acute exacerbation of atopic dermatitis was examined. Patients in the high-dose UVA1 group (n = 15) were irradiated with 130 joules/cm2 UVA1; the control group (n = 10) was treated with UVA-UVB therapy in a minimal erythema dose-dependent manner (total number of treatments 15). High-dose UVA1 irradiation was found to induce a significant clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis (p less than 0.001). In comparison with UVA-UVB therapy, significant differences in favor of high-dose UVA1 were observed (p less than 0.01). High-dose UVA1, but not UVA-UVB treatment, significantly reduced the elevated serum level of eosinophil cationic protein in patients with atopic dermatitis (p less than 0.003). These studies indicate that high-dose UVA1 irradiation may represent a novel phototherapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with an acute exacerbation of atopic dermatitis.