High Doses Of Inhaled Corticosteroids Research Articles

7432 Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency Caused By Concurrent Treatment With Budesonide And Itraconazole

Abstract Disclosure: F. Anjum: None. M.G. Jakoby: None. Introduction: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are unlikely to affect corticotroph axis function even at high doses due to low systemic absorption. However, co-treatment with drugs that reduce hepatic clearance of ICS may predispose patients to secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI). We report a case of secondary AI that occurred during concurrent treatment with budesonide and itraconazole. Case presentation: A 42-year-old female with longstanding asthma managed with inhaled budesonide (160 μg twice daily) was started on itraconazole (200 mg twice daily) for management of pulmonary histoplasmosis. Over the next three months, she experienced severe fatigue, and laboratory evaluation was notable for an undetectable (< 0.4 μg/dL) 8 AM cortisol level. Serum sodium (140 mM, 136-145) and potassium (4.6 mM, 3.5-5.1) were unremarkable, and a diagnosis of drug induced secondary AI was made. Treatment with hydrocortisone (15 mg in the morning, 5 mg in the evening) was started, and the patient’s infectious disease specialist stopped itraconazole, substituting posaconazole (300 mg daily) for an additional six months. Her pulmonologist substituted fluticasone (250 μg twice daily) for budesonide. After an approximate two-month hydrocortisone taper, 8 AM ACTH level was easily detectable (37.2 pg/mL, 7.2-63.3), though 30 min stimulated cortisol level was subnormal (11.1 μg/dL, expected > 18). Hydrocortisone was successfully tapered off over an additional two-months (30 min stimulated cortisol 23.4 μg/dL). Discussion: The literature on ICS induced secondary AI is generally case reports and series, and the incidence is very low (1.1/10,000 patient-years at risk). Limited oral bioavailability, high deposition in lungs, extensive protein binding, and robust hepatic clearance are factors that minimize the effects of ICS on corticotroph axis function. However, concurrent treatment with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors like itraconazole can significantly reduce hepatic clearance of ICS and predispose to systemic effects, including Cushing syndrome when high dose ICS are prescribed or secondary AI at lower doses. In a series of 25 cystic fibrosis patients co-treated with itraconazole and budesonide, 11/25 (44%) developed secondary AI. Our patient likely developed secondary AI but not Cushing syndrome due to treatment with low dose budesonide. This case illustrates the importance that endocrinologists recognize CY3A4 inhibiting drugs as a risk factor for secondary AI in patient treated with ICS. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Adverse Impacts of Corticosteroid Treatment on Osteoporosis/Osteopenia in Adult Asthmatics: A Retrospective ICARUS Cohort Study

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and oral corticosteroid (OCS) are often used in asthma management. This study evaluated the long-term effect of ICS/OCS on osteoporosis, osteopenia, fractures, and bone metabolism in adult asthmatics in real-world clinical practice. This is a retrospective study investigating de-identified electronic health records from Ajou University Medical Center (Korea). Adult asthmatics receiving maintenance ICS with/without OCS for at least 1 year were enrolled. They were classified into the high/low-dose of ICS or OCS groups. Primary outcomes (incidences of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures) and secondary outcomes (drug prescription and laboratory values related to bone metabolism including albumin and alkaline phosphatase [ALP]) were compared after 5 years of follow-up. After propensity score matching, both high- and low-dose OCS groups included 468 patients, and high/low-dose ICS groups each comprised 1,252 patients. The risk of osteoporosis/major fracture was higher (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 2.00 [1.15-3.57]/3.03 [1.04-11.11]) in the high-dose OCS group (especially in females aged ≥50 years) than in the low-dose group, although the ICS groups showed no significant differences. The high-dose ICS group showed a higher risk of osteopenia (1.92 [1.05-3.70]) than the low-dose ICS group. The linear mixed model of laboratory values showed significantly decreased serum albumin and increased ALP in the high-dose OCS group than in the low-dose OCS group. The results of this study suggest that long-term use of OCS can increase the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures, while long-term use of ICS may increase the risk of osteopenia in adult asthmatics.

Urban-rural and socio-economic differences in inhaled corticosteroid treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A nationwide register-based cross-sectional study

BackgroundUrban-rural disparities within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been documented in USA, but not in Europe. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are widely used in COPD despite strict recommendations. We aimed to investigate urban-rural and socioeconomic differences in ICS treatment for COPD. MethodsA Danish nationwide register-based cross-sectional study. All patients alive on the December 31, 2018 with a J44 ICD-10 diagnosis code (COPD) were included (99,057 patients). Daily average ICS dose was calculated from the accumulated ICS use during 2018 based on redeemed prescriptions. Patients were divided into groups: No ICS, low dose ICS, medium dose ICS, high dose ICS. A multinomial logistic regression model including educational level, co-habitation status, age, and sex was performed with “No ICS” as reference group. ResultsCompared to capital municipalities, living in other municipality types was associated with an increased probability of receiving medium and high dose ICS treatment, and increasing odds ratios (ORs) were seen with increasing ICS dose (medium dose ICS: ORs between 1.31 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.24–1.38) and 1.35 (95%CI 1.28–1.41), high dose ICS: ORs between 1.73 (95%CI 1.59–1.88) and 1.80 (95%CI 1.68–1.92)). Patients had increased probability of receiving ICS treatment if they were female, were co-habiting, or had completed only primary education. ConclusionPatients with a hospital-registered COPD diagnosis in non-capital municipalities receive more ICS, and in higher doses, compared to patients in capital municipalities. This is the first study to confirm that such urban-rural differences exist in Europe, and further research on this area is warranted.

The effects of inhaled corticosteroids on healthy airways.

The effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on healthy airways are poorly defined. To delineate the effects of ICS on gene expression in healthy airways, without confounding caused by changes in disease-related genes and disease-related alterations in ICS responsiveness. Randomized open-label bronchoscopy study of high-dose ICS therapy in 30 healthy adult volunteers randomized 2:1 to (i) fluticasone propionate 500 mcg bd daily or (ii) no treatment, for 4 weeks. Laboratory staff were blinded to allocation. Biopsies and brushings were analysed by immunohistochemistry, bulk RNA sequencing, DNA methylation array and metagenomics. ICS induced small between-group differences in blood and lamina propria eosinophil numbers, but not in other immunopathological features, blood neutrophils, FeNO, FEV1, microbiome or DNA methylation. ICS treatment upregulated 72 genes in brushings and 53 genes in biopsies, and downregulated 82 genes in brushings and 416 genes in biopsies. The most downregulated genes in both tissues were canonical markers of type-2 inflammation (FCER1A, CPA3, IL33, CLEC10A, SERPINB10 and CCR5), T cell-mediated adaptive immunity (TARP, TRBC1, TRBC2, PTPN22, TRAC, CD2, CD8A, HLA-DQB2, CD96, PTPN7), B-cell immunity (CD20, immunoglobulin heavy and light chains) and innate immunity, including CD48, Hobit, RANTES, Langerin and GFI1. An IL-17-dependent gene signature was not upregulated by ICS. In healthy airways, 4-week ICS exposure reduces gene expression related to both innate and adaptive immunity, and reduces markers of type-2 inflammation. This implies that homeostasis in health involves tonic type-2 signalling in the airway mucosa, which is exquisitely sensitive to ICS.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Old, Unfinished History.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major causes of disability and death. Maintenance use of inhaled bronchodilator(s) is the cornerstone of COPD pharmacological therapy, but inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are also commonly used. This narrative paper reviews the role of ICSs as maintenance treatment in combination with bronchodilators, usually in a single inhaler, in stable COPD subjects. The guidelines strongly recommend the addition of an ICS in COPD subjects with a history of concomitant asthma or as a step-up on the top of dual bronchodilators in the presence of hospitalization for exacerbation or at least two moderate exacerbations per year plus high blood eosinophil counts (≥300/mcl). This indication would only involve some COPD subjects. In contrast, in real life, triple inhaled therapy is largely used in COPD, independently of symptoms and in the presence of exacerbations. We will discuss the results of recent randomized controlled trials that found reduced all-cause mortality with triple inhaled therapy compared with dual inhaled long-acting bronchodilator therapy. ICS use is frequently associated with common local adverse events, such as dysphonia, oral candidiasis, and increased risk of pneumonia. Other side effects, such as systemic toxicity and unfavorable changes in the lung microbiome, are suspected mainly at higher doses of ICS in elderly COPD subjects with comorbidities, even if not fully demonstrated. We conclude that, contrary to real life, the use of ICS should be carefully evaluated in stable COPD patients.

National Development in the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroid Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Repeated Cross-Sectional Studies from 1998 to 2018.

Recommendations for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have shifted towards a more restrictive use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We aimed to identify the nationwide development over time in the use of ICS treatment in COPD. We conducted a register-based repeated cross-sectional study using Danish nationwide registers. On a yearly basis from 1998 to 2018, we included all patients in Denmark ≥ 40 years of age with an ICD-10 diagnosis of COPD (J44). Accumulated ICS use was calculated for each year based on redeemed prescriptions. Patients were divided into the following groups: No ICS, low-dose ICS, medium-dose ICS, or high-dose ICS. From 1998 to 2018, the yearly proportion of patients without ICS treatment increased (from 50.6% to 57.6%), the proportion of patients on low-dose ICS treatment increased (from 11.3% to 14.9%), and the proportion of patients on high-dose ICS treatment decreased (from 17.0% to 9.4%). We demonstrated a national reduction in the use of ICS treatment in COPD from 1998 to 2018, with an increase in the proportion of patients without ICS and on low-dose ICS treatment and a decrease in the proportion of patients on high-dose ICS treatment.

Reduction of daily maintenance inhaled corticosteroids in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (SHAMAL): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study

Stepwise intensification of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is routine for severe eosinophilic asthma, despite some poor responses to high-dose ICS. Dose reductions are recommended in patients responding to biologics, but little supporting safety evidence exists. SHAMAL was a phase 4, randomised, open-label, active-controlled study done at 22 study sites in four countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma and a five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score below 1·5 and who received at least three consecutive doses of benralizumab before screening. We randomly assigned patients (3:1) to taper their high-dose ICS to a medium-dose, low-dose, and as-needed dose (reduction group) or continue (reference group) their ICS-formoterol therapy for 32 weeks, followed by a 16-week maintenance period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reducing their ICS-formoterol dose by week 32. The primary outcome was assessed in the reduction group, and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients receiving study treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04159519. Between Nov 12, 2019, and Feb 16, 2023, we screened and enrolled in the run-in period 208 patients. We randomly assigned 168 (81%) to the reduction (n=125 [74%]) and reference arms (n=43 [26%]). Overall, 110 (92%) patients reduced their ICS-formoterol dose: 18 (15%) to medium-dose, 20 (17%) to low-dose, and 72 (61%) to as-needed only. In 113 (96%) patients, reductions were maintained to week 48; 114 (91%) of patients in the reduction group had zero exacerbations during tapering. Rates of adverse events were similar between groups. 91 (73%) patients had adverse events in the reduction group and 35 (83%) in the reference group. 17 patients had serious adverse events in the study: 12 (10%) in the reduction group and five (12%) in the reference group. No deaths occurred during the study. These findings show that patients controlled on benralizumab can have meaningful reductions in ICS therapy while maintaining asthma control. AstraZeneca.

Clinical characteristics and cytokine profiles of adult obese asthma with type2 inflammation

Obesity-related non-eosinophilic asthma has been identified as a phenotype of asthma. However, mepolizumab and omalizumab improve asthma control in severe asthma with obesity, implying that type-2 cytokines may be involved in the deterioration of control in obese asthma. Despite this, the clinical details of obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers have not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers. Adult obese asthmatic patients were enrolled and were classified into two groups: obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers (T2) and obese asthma with negative type-2 inflammation markers (NT2), then data were compared. In total, 434 patients were enrolled (85% of patients were at GINA therapy step 4–5). The T2 group had a higher proportion of patients with persistent asthma since childhood and with allergic rhinitis. A higher percentage of patients used high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and experienced acute exacerbations (annual exacerbation ratio ≥ 1) in the T2 group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the T2 group was independently associated with younger age, comorbidity of allergic rhinitis, persistent asthma since childhood, use of high-dose ICS, and acute exacerbation rate ≥ 1. Adipocytokine levels were similar between the groups. Collectively, obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers is characterised by a higher percentage of persistent asthma since childhood and more severe asthma.

Low levels of endogenous anabolic androgenic steroids in females with severe asthma taking corticosteroids.

Patients with severe asthma are dependent upon treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and often also oral corticosteroids (OCS). The extent of endogenous androgenic anabolic steroid (EAAS) suppression in asthma has not previously been described in detail. The objective of the present study was to measure urinary concentrations of EAAS in relation to exogenous corticosteroid exposure. Urine collected at baseline in the U-BIOPRED (Unbiased Biomarkers for the Prediction of Respiratory Disease outcomes) study of severe adult asthmatics (SA, n=408) was analysed by quantitative mass spectrometry. Data were compared to that of mild-to-moderate asthmatics (MMA, n=70) and healthy subjects (HC, n=98) from the same study. The concentrations of urinary endogenous steroid metabolites were substantially lower in SA than in MMA or HC. These differences were more pronounced in SA patients with detectable urinary OCS metabolites. Their dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) concentrations were <5% of those in HC, and cortisol concentrations were below the detection limit in 75% of females and 82% of males. The concentrations of EAAS in OCS-positive patients, as well as patients on high-dose ICS only, were more suppressed in females than males (p<0.05). Low levels of DHEA were associated with features of more severe disease and were more prevalent in females (p<0.05). The association between low EAAS and corticosteroid treatment was replicated in 289 of the SA patients at follow-up after 12-18 months. The pronounced suppression of endogenous anabolic androgens in females might contribute to sex differences regarding the prevalence of severe asthma.

Impact of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids on glucose metabolism and diabetes mellitus: A mini review.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal corticosteroids (INS) are the mainstays of treatment for chronic respiratory diseases like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and allergic rhinosinusitis. In addition, these localized forms of steroid therapy are generally considered to have fewer systemic side effects compared to long-term oral corticosteroids. However, concern and controversy remain over the impact of ICS and INS on the incidence and control of diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the widespread use of ICS and INS, even small individual effects on DM could lead to large consequences for the global popu-lation. Multiple large observational studies suggest that high dose ICS is associated with increased incident DM and worsened DM control, though the contribution of other risk factors is less certain. In addition, only two studies were done to investigate the association of INS and DM, with both studies demon-strating a short-term association of INS use with hyperglycemia. While more research evaluating the risk of ICS/INS for DM-related adverse events is needed, high doses of ICS/INS should be avoided when possible. The following strategies for ICS/INS dose minimization can be considered: Use of non-pharmacological measures (trigger avoidance, smoking cessation, vaccination to avoid infection), control of comorbid conditions, use of non-ICS-containing medications, inter-mittent rather than regular ICS dosing, and appropriate de-escalation of high ICS doses.

Dupilumab sustains efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma regardless of ICS dose.

Dupilumab, a human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukins-4/13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. The TRAVERSE (NCT02134028) open-label extension study demonstrated the long-term safety and efficacy of dupilumab in patients ≥12 years who completed a previous dupilumab asthma study. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the parent studies. Here, we assess whether dupilumab sustains long-term efficacy in patients regardless of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose at parent study baseline (PSBL). Patients from phase 2b (NCT01854047) or phase 3 (QUEST; NCT02414854) studies receiving high- or medium-dose ICS at PSBL and enrolled in TRAVERSE were included. We analyzed unadjusted annualized severe exacerbation rates, change from PSBL in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ), 5-item asthma control questionnaire, and type 2 biomarkers in patients with type 2 asthma at baseline (blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL or fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥25 ppb), and subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophils or FeNO. Of patients with type 2 asthma (n = 1666), 891 (53.5%) were receiving high-dose ICS at PSBL. In this subgroup, unadjusted exacerbation rates for dupilumab versus placebo were 0.517 versus 1.883 (phase 2b) and 0.571 versus 1.300 (QUEST) over the parent study (52 weeks) and remained low throughout TRAVERSE (0.313-0.494). Improvements in pre-BD FEV1 were sustained throughout TRAVERSE. Similar clinical efficacy was observed among patients receiving medium-dose ICS at PSBL and biomarker subgroups. Dupilumab showed sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in patients with uncontrolled, moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma on high- or medium-dose ICS.

Burden and unmet need for specialist care in poorly controlled and severe childhood asthma in a Danish nationwide cohort

BackgroundAsthma is a common disease in childhood and adolescence with lifelong consequences particularly among those at risk of severe disease, poor control and/or frequent exacerbations. Specialist care is recommended for at-risk children and adolescents, yet access to specialist management in free-to-access healthcare settings remains poorly understood.MethodsA Danish nationwide cohort of children and adolescents aged 2–17 years with persistent asthma, defined as repeated redemption of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) during 2015, were followed for two years, to identify at-risk children and adolescents comprising those with severe asthma (classified according to GINA 2020 guidelines), poor control (defined as use of 400/600 (ages 2–11/12 +) annual doses of short-acting bronchodilators), or frequent exacerbations (defined as use of oral steroids or hospitalization), and access to specialist care. The population is chosen due to detailed medical records in the setting of universal health care.ResultsThe cohort comprised of 29,851 children and adolescents (59% boys), with a median age of 9 years. While 17% of children were on high dose ICS, 22% were on daily ICS below GINA low dose cut-off. Prevalence of severe asthma (3.0–6.5%) was lower than poor asthma control (6.4–25%); both declined from childhood to adolescence. Exacerbations occurred in 7.1–9.0% of children, with median number of exacerbations being 1 (IQR 1–1). Despite being classified as having mild-to-moderate asthma, 15% had poor asthma control and 3.8% experienced exacerbation(s), respectively. While 61% of children with severe asthma and 58% with exacerbation-prone disease were in specialist care, only 24% with uncontrolled disease were receiving specialist care. Of children and adolescents using high-dose ICS, 71% were managed in primary care, while the use of additional controllers was more common in specialist care.ConclusionsThroughout childhood and adolescence, there was a high prevalence of severe asthma and poor control, although their prevalence declined with age. We demonstrate a large unmet need for specialist care among children with at-risk asthma, particularly among those with poorly controlled asthma, even in a system with free-to-access, tax-funded healthcare.

High versus Medium Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) combined with bronchodilators have been identified to improve outcomes in COPD but also to be associated with certain adverse effects. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and summarize data on the efficacy and safety of dosing levels (high versus medium/low) of ICS alongside ancillary bronchodilators following PRISMA guidelines. Medline and Embase were systematically searched until December 2021. Randomized, clinical trials (RCTs) that met predefined inclusion criteria were included. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Any acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) risk was chosen as the primary efficacy outcome, mortality rate as the primary safety outcome, moderate/severe AECOPD risk as the secondary efficacy outcome and pneumonia risk as the secondary safety outcome. Subgroup analyses of individual ICS agents, of patients with baseline moderate/severe/very severe COPD and of patients with recent COPD exacerbation history were also performed. A random-effects model was used. We included 13 RCTs in our study. No data on low doses were included in the analysis. High dose ICS was not associated with a statistically significant difference in any AECOPD risk (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91-1.05, I2: 41.3%), mortality rate (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75-1.32, I2: 0.0%), moderate/severe AECOPD risk (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96-1.06, I2: 0.0%) or pneumonia risk (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86 -1.33, I2: 9.3%) compared to medium dose ICS. The same trend was identified with the several subgroup analyses. Our study collected RCTs investigating the optimal dosing level of ICS prescribed alongside ancillary bronchodilators to patients with COPD. We identified that the high ICS dose neither reduces AECOPD risk and mortality rates nor increases pneumonia risk relative to the medium dose.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Risk of Acquiring Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection. A Multiregional Epidemiological Study.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are associated with an increased risk of clinical pneumonia among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is unknown whether the risk of microbiologically verified pneumonia such as pneumococcal pneumonia is increased in ICS users. The study population consists of all COPD patients followed in outpatient clinics in eastern Denmark during 2010-2017. ICS use was categorized into four categories based on accumulated use. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used adjusting for age, body mass index, sex, airflow limitation, use of oral corticosteroids, smoking, and year of cohort entry. A propensity score matched analysis was performed for sensitivity analyses. A total of 21,438 patients were included. Five hundred and eighty-two (2.6%) patients acquired a positive lower airway tract sample withS. pneumoniaeduring follow-up. In the multivariable analysis ICS-use was associated with a dose-dependent risk ofS. pneumoniae as follows:low ICS dose: HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.45, p = 0.5; moderate ICS dose: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.90, p = 0.004; high ICS dose: HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.29, p < 0.0001, compared to no ICS use. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. Use of ICS in patients with severe COPD was associated with an increased and dose-dependent risk of acquiringS. pneumoniae, but only for moderate and high dose. Caution should be taken when administering high dose of ICS to patients with COPD. Low dose of ICS seemed not to carry this risk.

Dupilumab (Dupixent)

&#x0D; CADTH recommends that Dupixent should be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of patients aged 6 to younger than 12 years with severe asthma with a type 2/eosinophilic phenotype if certain conditions are met.&#x0D; Dupixent should only be covered for patients with severe asthma aged 6 to younger than 12 years with a type 2 or eosinophilic phenotype if their asthma is not controlled despite using medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and at least 1 additional medication or high-dose ICS alone, and if they have had at least 1 severe asthma exacerbation in the past year.&#x0D; Dupixent should only be reimbursed if prescribed by a pediatric respirologist or allergist, patients are managed by physicians with experience treating asthma in pediatric patients, and the price is reduced. Dupixent should not be used with other biologics.&#x0D;

Evidence of off-label inhalation therapy on pediatric asthma practice in Japan.

In Japan, many asthma inhalers do not have formal approval for use in the pediatric population because of the lack of domestic data. In real-world settings, however, numerous off-label medications are prescribed. Currently, the nature of off-label prescriptions of asthma inhalers on pediatric patients in Japan remains unclear. Using public open-source national medical claims data, we investigated the real-world descriptive epidemiology of off-label prescriptions for asthma inhalers for pediatric patients. We obtained the number of off-label prescriptions of formulations for patients aged 0-14 years from anonymously summarized prescription data for a 7-year period starting from April 2014. The actual prescription numbers and their chronology over time were then analyzed. In 2019, 143,439 asthma inhalers were used off label in children and adolescents. Overall, 96.1% were inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or long-acting beta stimulants (LABAs), and 3.9% were high-dose ICS. Of ICSs and LABAs, 18.8% were off-label prescriptions. The total number of off-label ICS/LABA prescriptions and their percentage relative to the overall formulations gradually decreased but a notable disparity was observed among inhaler types. There was a surprisingly large number of off-label prescriptions of asthma inhalers in the pediatric population in Japan. The proper use of ICSs/LABAs and expansion of insurance coverage should be advocated to reduce off-label use.

Association between inhaled corticosteroid use and risk of hyperglycemia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have a higher risk of developing diabetes, and studies suggest that inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) use may be associated with a higher risk of diabetes, particularly at higher doses. This study aims to investigate the effects of ICS use on the risk of diabetes and blood glucose levels in COPD patients. A systematic search was carried out on the PubMed, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest databases using the terms "Inhaled Corticosteroids," "Diabetes," and "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" for the period between 2013 and 2023. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guideline. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model using the RevMan 5 software. A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis, with 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 observational studies. Two observational studies investigated the relationship between ICS dose and diabetes risk. A meta-analysis of the RCTs studies showed a nonstatistically significant tendency toward increased blood glucose (odds ratio [OR] 1.07 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.30) after a 52-week follow-up. Whereas the observational studies showed a tendency toward an increased risk of diabetes (OR 1.40 and 95% CI 0.96-2.03). Furthermore, a subgroup meta-analysis of high-dose ICS (>900 μg/day) showed a significant increase in the risk of diabetes (OR 1.20 and 95% CI 1.09-1.32). Short-term use of ICS does not have a significant effect on blood glucose. However, long-term use, especially at higher doses, can increase the risk of developing diabetes.

Effect of Stepping Up to High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Asthma: UK Database Study

It is unclear whether patients with asthma benefit from stepping up to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). To determine the effectiveness of stepping up to high-dose ICSs. A historic cohort study of patients with asthma (≥13 years old), identified from 2 large UK electronic medical record databases, was conducted. Patients who remained on medium-dose ICSs were compared with those who stepped up from medium- to high-dose ICSs, whereas patients who stepped up from low- to medium-dose ICSs were compared with those who stepped up from low- to high-dose ICSs. Time to first severe exacerbation (primary outcome) between treatment groups was compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, and the number of exacerbations and antibiotics courses was analyzed using negative binomial regression. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to handle confounding. The mean follow-up time to first exacerbation was 2.7 ± 2.7 years for those who remained on stable medium-dose ICSs and 2.0 ± 2.2 years for those who stepped up from medium- to high-dose ICSs. A similar pattern was noted for those who stepped up from low- to medium-dose ICSs (2.6 ± 2.5 years) and from low- to high-dose ICSs (2.3 ± 2.5 years). Patients who stepped up from medium- to high-dose ICSs (n= 6879) had a higher risk of exacerbations during follow-up compared with those who remained on medium-dose ICSs (n= 51,737; hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.22). This was similar in patients stepping up from low- to high-dose (n= 3232) compared with low- to medium-dose (n= 12,659) ICSs (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17). A step-up to high-dose ICSs was also associated with a higher number of asthma exacerbations and antibiotics courses. No significant difference in associations was found across subgroups of patients with different blood eosinophil counts. We found no evidence that a step-up to high-dose ICSs is effective in preventing future asthma exacerbations.

Risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes among adults and children with moderate-to-severe asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation in the United Kingdom requested an evidence synthesis to investigate the relationship between asthma and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise evidence on the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in people with uncontrolled asthma or markers of asthma severity. High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or oral corticosteroids (OCS) were used as markers of asthma severity, following international or national asthma guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Adjusted point estimates were extracted for random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses. After screening, 12 studies (11 in adults and one in children) met the eligibility criteria. Adults using high-dose ICS or OCS had a pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.33 (95% CI 1.06-1.67, I2=0%) for hospitalisation and an aHR of 1.22 (95% CI 0.90-1.65, I2=70%) for mortality for COVID-19. We found insufficient evidence for associations between markers on COVID-19 mortality in the subgroup analyses. Adults with severe asthma are at increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation compared to nonusers. Our analysis highlighted the dearth of studies in children with asthma investigating serious COVID-19 outcomes.

IMPACT OF ALLERGEN SENSITIZATION ON AIRFLOW LIMITATION IN CHILDREN WITH SEVERE ASTHMA

<h3>Introduction</h3> Airflow limitation (AFL) has been shown to predict poor asthma outcomes across maturation. The objective of our study is to identify significant predictors of AFL in children with severe asthma from school-age to adolescence. <h3>Methods</h3> Children ages 5-18 years with treatment-refractory asthma underwent spirometry and diagnostic bronchoscopy. AFL was defined as pre-bronchodilator FEV₁/FVC <0.85 or <90% predicted. Demographics, treatments, and blood and lung markers of inflammation were analyzed with between group non-parametric tests and logistic regression models. <h3>Results</h3> 226 children were included in this analysis. Nearly one-half (n=105, 46%) had AFL. There was no difference in age, gender, BMI, or age of symptom onset between groups. Compared to children without AFL, those with AFL were more likely to have previous ICU admission for asthma, treatment with higher-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and reported black race. Children with AFL had significantly higher total blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) eosinophil count, total IgE, and greater number of positive allergen specific serum IgE. In younger children, those with sensitization to ≥4 allergens had greater airflow limitation but the opposite relationship was seen in adolescent children. Similarly, the effects of higher total IgE (>130 IU/mL) on airflow limitation were most prominent in younger children. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Significant predictors of airflow limitation in children with severe asthma include black race, previous ICU admission for asthma, higher-dose ICS treatment, and increased absolute blood and BAL eosinophil count. AFL is driven in part by allergic sensitization in the younger children whereas in older children this associated more with the absence of allergic sensitization.