High Bleeding Risk Patients Research Articles

Closure of gastric mucosal defects using the reopenable-clip over the line method to decrease the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter propensity score-matched case-control study (with video)

Background and AimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-ESD bleeding presents significant risks. Closing mucosal defects following ESD may reduce the incidence of post-ESD bleeding. Currently, no optimal closure method exists. Therefore, we invented clip-line closure using the reopenable-clip over the line method (ROLM) and evaluated its efficacy in preventing post-ESD bleeding. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent gastric ESD between January 2012–March 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: the non-closure group (mucosal defect remained unclosed) and the ROLM group (defect was closed using ROLM). Baseline characteristics of patients, distribution of bleeding risk factors, and incidence and timing of post-ESD bleeding were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential bias. ResultsFollowing propensity score-matching, 162 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the non-closure group, whereas 160 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the ROLM group. The mean long diameter of the mucosal defects, procedure time for ROLM, and number of clips required for ROLM were 45.9 mm, 35.6 min, and 33.2, respectively. All mucosal defects resulting from the ESD were fully closed using ROLM. The post-ESD bleeding rate in the ROLM group was significantly lower (1.8%, 3/168 lesions) than in the non-closure group (7.7%, 13/168 lesions, p = 0.02). ConclusionsROLM is feasible for mucosal defect closure following gastric ESD and effectively prevents post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients, addressing a significant gap in existing methods.

Risk score guided dual antiplatelet therapy duration in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the FORCE-ACS registry

Abstract Background The use of risk scores to guide the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) is recommended in current guidelines, however clinical data on the impact of its prospective use is lacking. Purpose To compare risk-score guided DAPT duration to standard of care in ACS patients. Methods Since 2015, patients with ACS are enrolled in the prospective FORCE-ACS registry. In 2018, we implemented a risk score-guided approach for DAPT duration. In this analysis, we compared patients in which DAPT duration was guided by bleeding and ischemic risk assessment using PRECISE-DAPT-scores and DAPT-scores to a standard treatment group in a 1:4 ratio. In risk score-guided patients, high bleeding risk patients(HBR) were advised short DAPT(≤6 months); patients without HBR or high ischemic risk(HIR) were advised 12 months DAPT; and patients without HBR but with HIR were advised prolonged DAPT(≥30 months). In the standard treatment group DAPT duration was left at the discretion of the treating physician. Exclusion criteria included no DAPT or oral anticoagulation at discharge or implanted bio-vascular stents. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction(MI), stent thrombosis(ST), stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium(BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding; a secondary composite ischemic outcome consisted of cardiovascular mortality, MI, ST and ischemic stroke. Kaplan-Meier plots with log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazard regression after adjustment of potential confounders were performed for the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses were performed for patients included after implementation of the risk score-guided approach and for censoring events within the first six months. Results Between 2015 and 2020 8,009 patients were enrolled in the FORCE-ACS registry, of which 5,518 patients were included for analysis. The risk-score guided group(n=1,200) more often presented with ST-elevation MI, percutaneous coronary intervention or optimal medical therapy, while standard treatment patients(n=4,318) were older, more often had prior MI, prior revascularization, received coronary artery bypass grafting or conservative management. In the risk-score guided group, 15.7% had HBR, 46.4% were without HBR or HIR, and 37.9% showed HIR without HBR. The primary outcome was 6.3%(n=75) in risk score-guided patients versus 14.8%(n=637) in the standard treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio(HR) 0.47 [95%CI 0.36–0.61], p<0.001). These results remained consistent after sensitivity analyses (fig 1B). Both the composite ischemic outcome(HR 0.54 [95%CI 0.41–0.72] p<0.001) and BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (HR 0.23 [95%CI 0.08-0.63], p=0.004) were significantly lower in risk score-guided patients compared to the standard treatment group. Conclusion In this prospective analysis, risk-score guided DAPT duration showed a significant reduction of both ischemic and bleeding events compared to standard treatment.

Shortened versus standard duration of dual antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with and without chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Impaired renal function is an established risk factor for recurrent cardiac events. The severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is related with an increased risk for both ischemic and bleeding complications. As a result, the clinical implications of antithrombotic therapies may be different in patients with CKD as compared to those without. Recently, shortened duration of DAPT, namely one to three months, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been proven as a safe and feasible strategy in various different clinical scenarios, like in high-bleeding risk patients, in acute coronary syndromes and complex PCI. However, it remains debatable whether DAPT should be shortened in patients with high ischemic and bleeding risk, such as those with CKD. Purpose The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the safety and efficacy of shortened therapy (1-3 months; S–DAPT) in patients without and without CKD undergoing PCI. Methods Three major databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were screened for eligible randomized – controlled trials, or subgroup or post – hoc analyses of them. The studies should compare shortened (S–DAPT) with longer (>3 months) DAPT (L–DAPT) in patients undergoing PCI, and include data on CKD presence. The endpoints were Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) and Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and should be evaluated at 12 months. NACE and MACE were used as per trial defined. The effect of different DAPT regimens was assessed by calculating the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model (Mantel-Haenzel). Results A total of eight studies and 56,660 patients were included in our analysis; a notable proportion of patients (9.7%, N=5,466) suffered from CKD. Our analysis showed an overall benefit of S-DAPT in NACE (RR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.81 – 0.95), which was consistent in patients with and without CKD (p-interaction=0.58). (Figure 1) No significant difference regarding MACE was observed between S-DAPT and L-DAPT (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.90 – 1.06) in both patients with and without CKD (p-interaction=0.19). (Figure 2) Conclusions Our analysis showed an overall benefit of S-DAPT in NACE without any difference in MACE, with similar findings among patients with and without CKD. Thus, DAPT shortening could be a feasible and safe approach when it is required, even in patients with impaired renal function. Further randomized controlled trials focusing on patients with CKD are required for validating the previous results and exploring further benefits of abbreviated duration of DAPT.Net adverse clinical eventsMajor adverse cardiac events

Proton pump inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a critical review.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are widely used medications for gastrointestinal disorders. Recent research suggests a potential association between long-term PPI use and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, creating a complex clinical dilemma. This review critically evaluates the current evidence for this association, considering the limitations of observational studies and the lack of definitive confirmation from randomized controlled trials.This review delves into the reported association between PPIs and adverse CV events, examining proposed mechanisms such as drug interactions, electrolyte imbalances induced by PPIs and their potential impact on cardiac and vascular function. Evidence suggests these mechanisms converge, with varying influence depending on patient populations.Clinicians require a risk-benefit analysis for each patient considering their CV risk profile. Alternative gastrointestinal therapies should be explored for high-bleeding risk patients. Medications with lower cytochrome-P450 interaction potential may be preferable among essential PPI users. Elucidating the specific mechanisms by which PPIs might influence CV health, assessing long-term vascular effects and investigating interactions with newer anticoagulant medications are crucial for future research.

Derivation and Validation of the PRECISE-HBR Score to Predict Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Accurate bleeding risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is important for treatment individualization. However, there is still an unmet need for a more precise and standardized identification of high bleeding risk patients. We derived and validated a novel bleeding risk score by augmenting the PRECISE-DAPT score with the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria. The derivation cohort comprised 29,188 patients undergoing PCI, of whom 1136 (3.9%) had a Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding at 1 year, from four contemporary real-world registries and the XIENCE V USA trial. The PRECISE-DAPT score was refitted with a Fine-Gray model in the derivation cohort and extended with the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary outcome was BARC 3 or 5 bleeding within 1 year. Independent predictors of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding were selected at multivariable analysis (p<0.01). The discrimination of the score was internally assessed with apparent validation and cross-validation. The score was externally validated in 4578 patients from the MASTER DAPT trial and 5970 patients from the STOPDAPT-2 total cohort. The PRECISE-HBR score (age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, white-blood-cell count, previous bleeding, oral anticoagulation, and ARC-HBR criteria) showed an area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year BARC 3 or 5 bleeding of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.74) at apparent validation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) at cross-validation, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in the MASTER DAPT, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66-0.79) in the STOPDAPT-2, with superior discrimination than the PRECISE-DAPT (cross-validation: Δ AUC, 0.01; p=0.02; MASTER DAPT: Δ AUC, 0.05; p=0.004; STOPDAPT-2: Δ AUC, 0.02; p=0.20) and other risk scores. In the derivation cohort, a cut-off of 23 points identified 11,414 patients (39.1%) with a 1-year BARC 3 or 5 bleeding risk ≥4%. An alternative version of the score, including acute myocardial infarction on admission instead of white-blood-cell count, showed similar predictive ability. The PRECISE-HBR score is a contemporary, simple 7-item risk score to predict bleeding after PCI, offering a moderate improvement in discrimination over multiple existing scores. Further evaluation is required to assess its impact on clinical practice.

Contemporary Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Angioplasty: A Comprehensive Review.

The interventional treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) has undergone significant improvements thanks to technological innovations. Nowadays, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is the standard of care for the treatment of CAD. Nevertheless, the non-negligible incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and suboptimal results in various anatomical settings has led to the development of drug-coated balloons (DCBs). DCBs are catheter-based balloons whose surface is coated with an anti-proliferative drug (mainly Paclitaxel or Sirolimus) loaded onto the balloon surface with different technologies and dose concentrations. In the beginning, these devices were used for the treatment of ISR showing an excellent efficacy profile in the inhibition of intimal hyperplasia. Subsequently, several studies evaluated their use in other angiographical and clinical contexts such as de novo lesions, small vessel disease, diffuse coronary disease, bifurcation lesions, acute coronary syndromes, high-bleeding risk and diabetic patients. This comprehensive review aims to describe the main DCB platforms on the market, their fields of application with the main supporting studies and their future perspectives.

One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in High Bleeding Risk Asian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Onyx ONE Clear 2-Year Results.

One-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the Resolute OnyxTM zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) is safe and effective. Asian patients have a unique ischemia/bleeding risk profile. Here, we compare the outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients after PCI and 1-month DAPT. Onyx ONE Clear was a prospective, multicenter study enrolling HBR patients undergoing PCI with the Resolute Onyx ZES (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03647475). Event-free patients after 1-month DAPT transitioned to single antiplatelet therapy. Clinical outcomes between 1 month and 2 years were compared between patients from Asian and non-Asian countries after 1 : 1 propensity score matching accounting for baseline differences. Patients from Asian countries represented 18% (n=273) of the study group (n=1,507). Non-Asian patients had greater clinical complexity; however, these differences were minimal after matching. There were no significant differences in ischemic outcomes between matched cohorts from 1 month to 2 years, including the primary composite endpoint of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (12% vs. 12%; P>0.99). However, there were significantly fewer Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3-5 bleeding events in the Asian vs. non-Asian cohort (4% vs. 9%; P=0.007), despite similar bleeding risk profiles after matching. After propensity score matching, HBR patients from Asian countries undergoing PCI treated with 1-month DAPT had similar ischemic outcomes but fewer bleeding events between 1 month and 2 years compared with patients from non-Asian countries.

One-month DAPT after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients at high-bleeding risk: an individual patient data pooled analysis of the SENIOR and POEM trials.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) can be shortened up to 1 month in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients receiving a contemporary biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent. We aimed to summarize the evidence on a similar DAPT regimen after biodegradable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation in patients at HBR. We pooled the individual participant data from the available trials evaluating this strategy, namely, the SENIOR and the POEM trials. Inclusion criteria were ≥1 biodegradable-polymer EES implantation and ≤1-month duration of DAPT. The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Major bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 bleeding. Landmark analyses were performed at 1 month, the time point for intended DAPT interruption. We included 766 participants (age 77.5 ± 8.2 years, women 31.9%), 323 from the SENIOR and 443 from the POEM trial. The primary endpoint occurred in 45 participants (6.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-7.7%) through 1 year of follow-up, with 21 (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.6-3.9%) events during the first month and 24 (3.4%; 95% CI, 2.0-4.7%) thereafter. The incidences of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 2.2% (95% CI, 0.36-2.50%), 3.1% (95% CI, 1.8-4.3%), and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.4-2.0%), respectively. BARC type 3-5 bleeding ocuurred in 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3-1.8%) at 1 month and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.6-4.1%) at 1 year. HBR patients receiving biodegradable-polymer EES had few ischemic and bleeding events when given 1 month of DAPT. One-month DAPT after biodegradable-polymer EES implantation seems safe in patients at HBR.

A comparison of simplified or conventional antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure in patients at high bleeding risk: the PLATEBRISK study.

Antithrombotic treatment (ATT) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains controversial. Furthermore, most of the patients undergoing LAAO are at a very high bleeding risk. This study aimed to compare a simplified versus conventional ATT after LAAO in very high bleeding risk patients. This is a multicentre, retrospective study including very high bleeding risk patients, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition, who underwent LAAO. These included patients at >4% risk of BARC 3 to 5 bleeding or >1% risk of intracranial bleeding after the procedure. Two groups were established based on the discharge ATT. The simplified group included single antiplatelet treatment or no treatment, and the conventional group comprised dual antiplatelet treatment or anticoagulation (combined or not with antiplatelet therapy). A total of 1,135 patients were included. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.5±1.5 and 3.7±1.0, respectively. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, device-related thrombus or major bleeding) between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.11; p=0.188). Although the rate of major bleeding during the first year was numerically lower in the simplified group, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.104). Nonetheless, patients with previous major bleeding presented a significantly lower rate of major bleeding when using the simplified treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-0.99; p=0.049). In patients with very high bleeding risk, a simplified ATT after LAAO seems to be as effective as conventional protocols. Furthermore, patients with a history of major bleeding experienced a lower risk of major bleeding with the simplified ATT.

Apixaban vs rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation at high or low bleeding risk: A population-based cohort study

BackgroundDespite many atrial fibrillation (AF) patients being at risk of bleeding, very limited data are available on bleeding rates of different direct oral anticoagulants based on the spectrum of bleeding risk. ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolic events with apixaban vs rivaroxaban for AF patients stratified by bleeding risk. MethodsWe conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all adult patients (66 years or older) with AF in Ontario, Canada, who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2020. Bleeding risk was estimated by the HAS-BLED score, with high bleeding risk defined as a score of ≥3. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events. Comparisons were adjusted for baseline comorbidities by inverse probability of treatment weighting. ResultsThis study included 18,156 AF patients with high bleeding risk and 55,186 AF patients with low bleeding risk. Apixaban use was more common in patients with high bleeding risk; 63% of high-risk patients used apixaban compared with 56% of low-risk patients. Apixaban users had lower rates of major bleeding in high-risk patients (2.9% vs 4.2% per year; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58–0.81) and in low-risk patients (1.8% vs 2.9% per year; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.56–0.70) compared with rivaroxaban. There were no differences in rates of thromboembolic events, 3.1% vs 3.0% per year (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86–1.22) in high-risk patients and 1.9% vs 1.9% per year (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89–1.14) in low-risk patients. ConclusionIn older AF patients with high or low bleeding risk, treatment with apixaban was associated with lower rates of major bleeding with no difference in risk for thromboembolic events compared with rivaroxaban.

Long-term outcomes of high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a Korean nationwide registry.

Patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at increased risk of not only bleeding, but also ischaemic events. This study aimed to determine the long-term relative risk of ischaemic and bleeding events in HBR patients. This study was a nationwide cohort study, based on the Korean National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. Patients diagnosed with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and those who underwent PCI in Korea between 2009 and 2018 were included in the analysis. According to the Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria, the total population was divided into HBR and non-HBR groups. The co-primary outcomes were major bleeding events and ischaemic (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke) events. Among a total of 325 417 patients who underwent PCI, 66 426 patients (20.4%) had HBR. During the follow-up period, HBR patients had a higher risk for major bleeding events (23.9% vs. 8.9%, P < .001) and ischaemic events (33.8% vs. 14.4%, P < .001). However, the impact of HBR was significant for major bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) 3.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.04-3.21, P < .001] and for ischaemic events (HR 2.50, 95% CI 2.45-2.56, P < .001). The HBR group was also associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.73, 95% CI 3.66-3.79, P < .001). The average annual rate of major bleeding events within the first year after PCI was 5.5% for a single major criterion, and 2.9% for a single minor criterion. Among patients undergoing PCI, those with HBR were at increased long-term risk for both bleeding and ischaemic events, with a greater risk of mortality compared to non-HBR patients.

Demystifying the Contemporary Role of 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome.

For almost two decades, 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been the only class I recommendation on DAPT in American and European guidelines, which has resulted in 12-month durations of DAPT therapy being the most frequently implemented in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across the globe. Twelve-month DAPT was initially grounded in the results of the CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events) trial, which, by design, studied DAPT versus no DAPT rather than the optimal DAPT duration. The average DAPT duration in this study was 9 months, not 12 months. Subsequent ACS studies, which were not designed to assess DAPT duration, rather its composition (aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel) were further interpreted as supportive evidence for 12-month DAPT duration. In these studies, the median DAPT duration was 9 or 15 months for ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively. Several subsequent studies questioned the 12-month regimen and suggested that DAPT duration should either be fewer than 12 months in patients at high bleeding risk or more than 12 months in patients at high ischemic risk who can safely tolerate the treatment. Bleeding, rather than ischemic risk assessment, has emerged as a treatment modifier for maximizing the net clinical benefit of DAPT, due to excessive bleeding and no clear benefit of prolonged treatment regimens in high bleeding risk patients. Multiple DAPT de-escalation treatment strategies, including switching from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, reducing the dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor, and shortening DAPT duration while maintaining monotherapy with ticagrelor, have been consistently shown to reduce bleeding without increasing fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular or cerebral ischemic risks compared with 12-month DAPT. However, 12-month DAPT remains the only class-I DAPT recommendation for patients with ACS despite the lack of prospectively established evidence, leading to unnecessary and potentially harmful overtreatment in many patients. It is time for clinical practice and guideline recommendations to be updated to reflect the totality of the evidence regarding the optimal DAPT duration in ACS.

Feasibility of anticoagulation on demand after percutaneous coronary intervention in high-bleeding risk patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the INTERMITTENT registry.

This study evaluated the feasibility of the intermittent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) guided by continuous rhythm monitoring via a clinically validated wearable smart device in high-bleeding risk (HBR) patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) otherwise subjected to chronic anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The INTERMITTENT registry was a 3-year prospective observational study at eight Italian centres. Inclusion criteria were elective or urgent PCI, Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria, history of symptomatic 12-lead ECG detected paroxysmal AF episodes, indication to DOACs, and use of a wearable smart device (Apple Watch™). Thirty days after PCI, patients free of AF episodes discontinued DOAC. However, if an AF episode lasting >6 min or a total AF burden > 6 h over 24 h was detected, DOAC was initiated for 30 consecutive days, and withdrawn afterwards if no further AF episodes occurred. At the discretion of the referring physician, intermittent anticoagulation was offered to 89 patients, whereas continuous treatment with DOACs was prescribed to 151 patients. During a follow-up of 298 ± 87 days, the average duration of oral anticoagulation was significantly shorter in the intermittent anticoagulation group (176 ± 43 days, P = 0.0001), representing a 40% reduction in anticoagulation time compared to the continuous group. Ischaemic and bleeding endpoints were not significantly different between the two groups. Propensity score-matching resulted in a total of 69 matched patients with intermittent vs. continuous anticoagulation, respectively. During a follow-up of 291 ± 63 days, there was a significant 46% reduction in anticoagulation time in the intermittent compared to the continuous group (P = 0.0001). In HBR patients with a history of paroxysmal AF episodes who underwent PCI, intermittent anticoagulation guided by continuous rhythm monitoring with a wearable device was feasible and decreased significantly the duration of anticoagulation.

An Integrated Approach to the Prevention of Postpartum Bleeding in High-Risk Patients

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated approach to the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in high-risk patients using uterine balloon tamponade with a double-balloon system, double-sided compression suture on the lower uterine segment, and administration of a uterotonic drug.Materials and Methods. Here we performed an open-label, comparative, controlled clinical trial aimed at establishing superiority. 144 pregnant patients with a high risk of PPH were randomised into 2 groups of 72 patients each. When implementing the study protocol, 22 patients were excluded from the treatment group, and 1 patient was excluded from the control group. In the treatment group, in addition to routine prevention, we applied an original technique which included uterine balloon tamponade with a double-balloon system, double-sided compression suture in the lower uterine segment, and intravenous administration of carbetocin. Control group received routine prevention of PPH. Statistical data analysis was carried out using Python version 3.11.Results. The volume of blood loss ranged from 500 to 1900 mL in the treatment group and from 400 to 3900 mL in the control group (p = 0.375). In the treatment group, the incidence of PPH was significantly lower than in the control group (10.00% and 49.30%, respectively, p &lt; 0.0001), as well as the frequency of blood loss &gt; 1000 mL (20.00% and 39.44%, respectively, p = 0.002). Blood loss &gt; 2000 mL was recorded exclusively in the control group (12.69% patients). Among the secondary outcomes, blood products were used significantly less frequently in patients of the treatment group compared to the control group (12.00% and 29.58%, respectively, p = 0.027); hysterectomy was performed only in 6 (8.45%) patients of the control group. The duration of hospitalisation after childbirth did not differ significantly between the groups.Conclusion. An integrated approach to the prevention of PPH, which employs a double-sided compression suture on the lower uterine segment, uterine balloon tamponade using a double-balloon Zhukovsky system, and intravenous administration of a uterotonic drug, is more effective in preventing PPH in high-risk patients as compared with routine practice. Further multicenter extended studies in this direction are needed.

One-Month Versus Three-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy in High Bleeding Risk Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Shortening the duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was shown to be effective and safe in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). We aimed to investigate the effect of 1 versus 3-month DAPT on outcomes after drug-eluting stent in HBR patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data from 3 prospective single-arm studies (XIENCE Short DAPT Program) enrolling HBR patients after successful coronary implantation of cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE, Abbott) were analyzed. Subjects were eligible for DAPT discontinuation at 1 or 3 months if free from ischemic events. The primary end point was all-cause death or any myocardial infarction. The key secondary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 2 to 5 bleeding. Outcomes were assessed from 1 to 12 months after PCI. CKD was defined as baseline creatinine clearance <60 ml/min. Of 3,286 patients, 1,432 (43.6%) had CKD. One-month versus 3-month DAPT was associated with a similar 12-month risk of the primary outcome irrespective of CKD status (CKD: 9.5% vs 10.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.22; no-CKD: 6.6% vs 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.73; p interaction 0.299). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 to 5 bleeding rates were numerically but not significantly lower with 1-month versus 3-month DAPT in both CKD (9.9% vs 12%) and no-CKD (6.4% vs 9.0%) patients. In conclusion, in HBR patients, 1-month versus 3-month DAPT was associated with a similar risk of ischemic complications and a trend toward fewer bleeding events at 12 months after PCI, irrespective of CKD status.

Temporal trends in use of antisecretory agents among patients administered clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Antisecretory drugs are commonly prescribed with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, omeprazole and esomeprazole (inhibiting proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) may increase cardiovascular event rates on co-administration with clopidogrel. This study aimed to examine trends in the use of antisecretory agents in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT and the concomitant use of clopidogrel and inhibiting PPIs. We used National Inpatient Sample data compiled by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service from 2009 to 2020. Further, we identified patients who were prescribed clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI and investigated the concomitant use of antisecretory agents with clopidogrel. To verify the annual trend of drug utilization, we used the Cochran-Armitage trend test. From 2009 to 2020, the percentage of H2 receptor antagonist users decreased steadily (from 82.5% in 2009 to 25.3% in 2020); instead, the percentage of PPI users increased (from 23.7% in 2009 to 82.0% in 2020). The use of inhibiting PPI also increased (from 4.2% in 2009 to 30.7% in 2020). Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) were rarely used before 2019; however, in 2020, it accounted for 7.8% of the antisecretory users. Our study demonstrates that the use of inhibiting PPIs increased steadily in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT therapy. This is a major concern since the concomitant use of inhibiting PPIs with clopidogrel could increase the risk of cardiovascular events.

Left atrial appendage clipping during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: a very long-term, single-center experience

Abstract Background/introduction Epicardial left atrial appendage (LAA) clipping is an effective strategy for stroke prophylaxis in high thromboembolic (TE) and bleeding risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition to LAA exclusion from systemic circulation, clipping promotes concomitant appendage isolation, which might have positive impacts on arrhythmia control. Purpose The aim of this study was to report safety, success rate, and the long-term clinical outcomes of LAA clipping in a large cohort of AF patients undergoing concomitant hybrid ablation. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing hybrid AF ablation between 2013 and 2023 were enrolled. Hybrid ablation was performed in a one-step procedure consisting of thoracoscopic epicardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation followed by endocardial mapping and ablation, if needed. Ablation lesion set included pulmonary vein (PV) and posterior wall (PW) isolation, as well as RF applications to the LAA/posterolateral ridge. LAA clipping was performed via Atriclip exclusion system (Atricure, Inc., The Nederlands) after epicardial ablation. Additional endocardial lesions were performed in case of incomplete epicardial ablation or at physician’s discretion. Results A total of 130 patients were included (mean age: 65±9.4; 72.3% males); among them, 19.2% and 55.4% had persistent or long-standing persistent AF, respectively. Mean CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED were 3.1±1.1 and 2.3+-0.5. Five patients (3.8 %) had absolute contraindication to long-term oral anticoagulation, 3 (2.3%) had previous life-threatening bleeding events, 17 (13.1%) had a previous TE event. The final clip size was 35mm in 90.7% cases. Acute success was achieved in 97.7%; failure was due to LAA size (n=1), proximity to phrenic nerve (n=1), or bypass graft (n=1). One patient had incomplete occlusion due to a large secondary lobe, which required a second clip. No periprocedural complications related to clipping were documented. At a mean follow-up of 51±35 months, one (0.8%) patient had a stroke and 3 (2.3%) a transient ischemic attack (4 events per 552 patient/years; 0.7%). One patient had a microreentrant tachycardia mapped from the area near the LAA clipping. Conclusion In a large cohort undergoing hybrid AF ablation, epicardial LAA clipping was safe and highly successful. Acute failure was rare and due to LAA morphology or proximity to phrenic nerve and bypass graft. Thromboembolic event rate was very low.

Can DAPT be discontinued at one month after PCI in high bleeding risk patients presenting with ACS?

Can DAPT be discontinued at one month after PCI in high bleeding risk patients presenting with ACS?

Consecutive or selectively included high bleeding risk patients in the MASTER DAPT screening log and trial

AimsScreening logs have the potential to appraise the actual prevalence and distribution of predefined patient subsets, avoiding selection biases, which are inevitably and potentially present in randomised trials and real-world registries, respectively. We aimed to assess the prevalence of high bleeding risk (HBR) characteristics in the real world and the external validity of the MASTER DAPT trial. Methods and resultsAll consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for at least two consecutive weeks across 65 sites participating in the trial were entered into a screening log. Of 2,847 consecutive patients, 1,098 (38.6 %) were HBR and 109 (9.9 %) consented for trial participation. PRECISE-DAPT score ≥ 25 was the most frequent HBR feature, followed by advanced age, use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and anaemia. Compared with consecutive HBR patients, consenting patients were older (≥ 75 years: 69 % versus 62 %, absolute standardized difference [SD] 0.16), more frequently male (78 % versus 71 %, absolute SD 0.18), had higher use of OAC (38 % versus 20 %, absolute SD 0.39), treatment with steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (10 % versus 5 %, SD 0.16), and prior cerebrovascular events (10 % versus 6 %, absolute SD 0.18) but lower PRECISE DAPT score ≥ 25 (54 % versus 66 %, absolute SD 0.24). ConclusionsThe HBR criteria distribution differed between consecutive versus selectively included HBR patients, suggesting the existence of selection biases in the trial population.

Safety and efficacy of the latest generation biodegradable polymer-coated ultrathin sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease in a European all-comer population with or without high bleeding risk: The Cruz HBR Registry.

The latest generation ultrathin Supraflex Cruz (Sahajanand Medical Technologies Limited, Surat, India) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has shown early healing properties and represents an attractive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) device in a high bleeding risk (HBR) population. The aim of this Cruz HBR registry was to assess safety and efficacy of the Supraflex Cruz SES in a large cohort of all-comer patients, of whom about one third were patients at HBR. Patients undergoing PCI were enrolled in this prospective, multi-centre, open label registry and stratified into non-HBR and HBR groups. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel and clinically driven target lesion revascularization within 12 months after PCI. The predefined aims were to show non-inferiority of the non-HBR group to the Supraflex arm of the TALENT Trial, and of the HBR group to polymer-free biolimus-coated stent arm of LEADERS FREE Trial. A total of 1203 patients were enrolled across 26 European centers, including a significant proportion (38.7%; N.=466) of HBR patients. A total of 1745 lesions were treated in 1203 patients and 2235 stents were implanted. The DOCE occurred within the total cohort in 5.8% of patients with a significant difference between HBR patients and non-HBR patients (8.1% vs. 4.4%; P<0.001). All-cause mortality at 12 months was significantly (P<0.0001) different among HBR (9.0%) and non-HBR patients (1.7%), respectively. At 12 months, the overall incidence of definite and probable stent thrombosis was 1.0%. Major bleeding occurred in 5.9% patients of the HBR group. These results met the non-inferiority criteria with respect to the TALENT trial for the non-HBR group (P<0.0001), and the LEADERS FREE trial for the HBR group (P<0.0001). The Cruz HBR registry confirms that PCI with the Supraflex Cruz SES is associated with a favorable clinical outcome in an all-comer population, including complex patients with HBR.