High Amplified In Breast Cancer 1 Research Articles

The relationship between the expression of amplified in breast cancer 1、androgen receptor and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

Objective: To discuss the value of amplified in breast cancer 1(AIB1) and androgen receptor (AR) for the resistance of adjuvant tamoxifen in estradiol receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. Methods: A total of 188 cases with breast cancer after receiving tamoxifen treatment in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 2008 to July 2013 were enrolled in this study.Using immunohistochemical SP method to detect AIB1and AR expression in breast cancer tissue, analyzing the relationship of AIB1 and AR expression and the effect of tamoxifen.And verify the results of the experiment through the GEPIA database. Results: The response of tamoxifen was 80.3%. The response rate in AR positive group and AR negative group was 79.6% and 82.4%, with no significant difference (P=0.669). The response rate in AIB1 High expression group and AIB1 Low expression group was 68.4% and 93.3%, respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.001).The response rate in AR negative and AIB1 Low expression group, AR negative and AIB1 High expression group, AR positive and AIB1 Low expression group, AR positive and AIB1High expression group was 89.7%, 71.4%, 96.7%, 66.2%respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.001). Conclusions: The expression level of AIB1 is correlated with the therapeutic effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer. Its high expression can cause tamoxifen resistance, while AR positive and High expression of AIB1 are more likely to cause tamoxifen resistance, and AIB1 can be used as an independent influencing factor for breast cancer tamoxifentreatment.

Abstract 2416: Upregulation of amplified in breast cancer 1 contributes to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression and vulnerability to blockage of hedgehog activation

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and devastating cancers without effective treatments. Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is a member of the steroid receptor coactivator family that mediates the transcriptional activities of nuclear receptors. While AIB1 is associated with the initiation and progression of multiple cancers, the mechanism by which AIB1 contributes to PDAC progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of AIB1 in the progression of PDAC and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Methods: The clinical significance and mRNA level of AIB1 in PDAC were studied by database analysis. To demonstrate whether AIB1 mediates the malignant features of PDAC cells, namely, proliferation, migration, invasion, we performed real-time PCR and Western blot analysis, established xenograft models and used in vivo metastasis assay. With insights into the mechanism of AIB1, we performed RNA sequencing (Seq), ChIP-Seq, luciferase reporter assays and pull-down assays. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between AIB1 expression and its target expression in PDAC cells and patients and explored whether PDAC cells with high AIB1 levels are sensitive to inhibitors of its target. Results: We found that AIB1 was significantly upregulated in PDAC and associated with its malignancy. Silencing AIB1 impaired hedgehog (Hh) activation by reducing the expression of smoothened (SMO), leading to cell cycle arrest and the inhibition of PDAC cell proliferation. In addition, AIB1, via upregulation of integrin αv (ITGAV) expression, promoted extracellular matrix (ECM) signaling, which played an important role in PDAC progression. Further studies showed that AIB1 preferably bound to AP-1 related elements and served as a coactivator for enhancing the transcriptional activity of MafB, which promoted the expression of SMO and ITGAV. PDAC cells with high AIB1 levels were sensitive to Hh signaling inhibitors, suggesting that blocking Hh activation is an effective treatment against PDAC with high AIB1 expression. Conclusions: These findings reveal that AIB1 is a crucial oncogenic regulator associated with PDAC progression via Hh and ECM signaling and suggest potential therapeutic targets for PDAC treatment. Citation Format: Licen Li, Jiaolin Bao, Haitao Wang, Haipeng Lei, Peng Cheng, Jianming Zeng, Wenhui Hao, Xu Zhang, Xiaoling Xu, Chundong Yu, Chu-Xia Deng, Qiang Chen. Upregulation of amplified in breast cancer 1 contributes to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression and vulnerability to blockage of hedgehog activation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2416.

Upregulation of amplified in breast cancer 1 contributes to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression and vulnerability to blockage of hedgehog activation

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive and devastating cancers without effective treatments. Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is a member of the steroid receptor coactivator family that mediates the transcriptional activities of nuclear receptors. While AIB1 is associated with the initiation and progression of multiple cancers, the mechanism by which AIB1 contributes to PDAC progression remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to explore the role of AIB1 in the progression of PDAC and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.Methods: The clinical significance and mRNA level of AIB1 in PDAC were studied by database analysis. To demonstrate whether AIB1 mediates the malignant features of PDAC cells, namely, proliferation, migration, invasion, we performed real-time PCR and Western blot analysis, established xenograft models and used in vivo metastasis assay. With insights into the mechanism of AIB1, we performed RNA sequencing (Seq), ChIP-Seq, luciferase reporter assays and pull-down assays. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between AIB1 expression and its target expression in PDAC cells and patients and explored whether PDAC cells with high AIB1 levels are sensitive to inhibitors of its target.Results: We found that AIB1 was significantly upregulated in PDAC and associated with its malignancy. Silencing AIB1 impaired hedgehog (Hh) activation by reducing the expression of smoothened (SMO), leading to cell cycle arrest and the inhibition of PDAC cell proliferation. In addition, AIB1, via upregulation of integrin αv (ITGAV) expression, promoted extracellular matrix (ECM) signaling, which played an important role in PDAC progression. Further studies showed that AIB1 preferably bound to AP-1 related elements and served as a coactivator for enhancing the transcriptional activity of MafB, which promoted the expression of SMO and ITGAV. PDAC cells with high AIB1 levels were sensitive to Hh signaling inhibitors, suggesting that blocking Hh activation is an effective treatment against PDAC with high AIB1 expression.Conclusions: These findings reveal that AIB1 is a crucial oncogenic regulator associated with PDAC progression via Hh and ECM signaling and suggest potential therapeutic targets for PDAC treatment.

The role of amplified in breast cancer 1 in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) expression is known to be involved in the initiation and progression of malignant breast cancer (BC), but its prognostic role remains uncertain. This meta-analysis assessed reported studies to evaluate this relationship. Electronic databases were systematically reviewed to collect eligible studies using pre-established criteria. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to estimate the impact of AIB1 protein expression on overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic properties of BC cases. Nine eligible studies, including 6774 patients, were finally assessed by the current clinical meta-analysis. AIB1 positivity correlated with reduced OS (pooled HR = 1.409, 95% CI 1.159-1.714, P = .001). AIB1 overexpression also impacted prognosis as shown by univariate (pooled HR = 1.420, 95% CI 1.154-1.747, P = .001) and multivariate (pooled HR = 1.446, 95% CI 1.099-1.956; P = .009) analyses. Notably, subgroup analyses also revealed that AIB1 overexpression was associated with poor OS in some subgroups, such as ER-positive group (pooled HR = 1.511, 95% CI 1.138-2.006, P = .004), ER-positive without tamoxifen administration group (pooled HR = 2.338, 95% CI 1.489-3.627, P < .001), and premenopausal women group (pooled HR = 1.715, 95% CI 1.231-2.390, P = .001). Additionally, high AIB1 protein levels were associated with HER2 positivity (pooled OR = 0.331, 95% CI 0.245-0.448; P < .001), poorly differentiated histological grade (pooled OR = 0.377, 95% CI 0.317-0.448; P < .001), high Ki67 (pooled OR = 0.501, 95% CI 0.410-0.612; P < .001), presence of lymph node metastases (pooled OR = 0.866, 95% CI 0.752-0.997; P = .045), and absence of progesterone receptor (pooled OR = 1.447, 95% CI 1.190-1.759; P < .001). This analysis demonstrated that AIB1 overexpression is related to aggressive phenotypes and unfavorable clinical outcomes in BC, and might involve in tamoxifen resistance. AIB1 may be a new prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in BC.

Prognostic and predictive importance of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole and tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: the Danish cohort of BIG 1-98

PurposeTo evaluate the estrogen receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) as a prognostic marker, as well as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors, in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.MethodAIB1 was analyzed with immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of the Danish subcohort (N = 1396) of the International Breast Cancer Study Group’s trial BIG 1-98 (randomization between adjuvant tamoxifen versus letrozole versus the sequence of the two drugs).ResultsForty-six percent of the tumors had a high AIB1 expression. In line with previous studies, AIB1 correlated to a more aggressive tumor-phenotype (HER2 amplification and a high malignancy grade). High AIB1 also correlated to higher estrogen receptor expression (80–100 vs. 1–79%), and ductal histological type. High AIB1 expression was associated with a poor disease-free survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.12–1.63. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.58) and overall survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.68. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.99–1.60). HER2 did not seem to modify the prognostic effect of AIB1. No difference in treatment effect between tamoxifen and letrozole in relation to AIB1 was found.ConclusionsIn a subset of the large international randomized trial BIG 1-98, we confirm AIB1 to be a strong prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Hence, although tumor AIB1 expression does not seem to be useful for the choice of tamoxifen versus an aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer, AIB1 is an interesting target for new anti-cancer therapies and further investigations of this biomarker is warranted.

Oestrogen receptor co-activator AIB1 is a marker of tamoxifen benefit in postmenopausal breast cancer

BackgroundThe oestrogen receptor (ER) co-activator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) has been suggested as a treatment predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer. Studies have however not been unanimous. Patients and methodsAIB1 protein expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry on tissue micro-arrays with tumour samples from 910 postmenopausal women randomised to tamoxifen treatment or no adjuvant treatment. Associations between AIB1 expression, clinical outcome in the two arms and other clinicopathological variables were examined. ResultsIn patients with ER-positive breast cancer expressing low tumour levels of AIB1 (<75%), we found no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) or breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) between tamoxifen treated and untreated patients. In patients with high AIB1 expression (>75%), there was a significant decrease in recurrence rate (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.61, P < 0.001) and breast cancer mortality rate (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.69, P = 0.0015) with tamoxifen treatment. In the untreated arm, we found high expression of AIB1 to be significantly associated with lower RFS (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.20–2.53, P = 0.0038). ConclusionOur results suggest that high AIB1 is a predictive marker of good response to tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women and a prognostic marker of decreased RFS in systemically untreated patients.

AIB1 is a predictive factor for tamoxifen response in premenopausal women

BackgroundClinical trials implicate the estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) to be a prognostic and a treatment-predictive factor, although results are not unanimous. We have further investigated this using a controlled randomised trial of tamoxifen versus control. Materials and methodsA total of 564 premenopausal women were entered into a randomised study independent of ER status. Using a tissue microarray, AIB1 and ER were analysed by immunohistochemistry. ResultsAIB1 scores were obtained from 349 women. High AIB1 correlated to factors of worse prognosis (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Nottingham histological grade 3, and lymph node metastases) and to ER negativity. In the control arm, high AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.02). However, ER-positive patients with high AIB1 responded significantly to tamoxifen treatment (P = 0.002), increasing RFS to the same level as for systemically untreated patients with low AIB1. Although ER-positive patients with low AIB1 had a better RFS from the beginning, this was not further improved by tamoxifen (P = 0.8). ConclusionsIn the control group, high AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor. However, ER-positive patients with high AIB1 responded significantly to tamoxifen. This implicates high AIB1 to be an independent predictive factor of improved response to tamoxifen and not, as has previously been discussed, a factor predicting tamoxifen resistance.

High amplified in breast cancer 1 is a significant predictor of improved response to adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal women.

Abstract Abstract #6049 Background: The estrogen receptor (ER) coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) has oncogene potentials and is believed to be of importance in breast cancer development and progression. Clinical trials implicate AIB1 to be a prognostic and a treatment predictive factor, although results have not been unanimous. This is to our knowledge the first report on AIB1's potential as a prognostic and/or a tamoxifen treatment predictive factor in a controlled randomised trial of tamoxifen vs no tamoxifen in premenopausal women.&amp;#x2028; Patients and Methods: 349 premenopausal women with stage two breast cancer were randomised to tamoxifen for two years vs no tamoxifen independent of ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) status. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was chosen as the primary outcome and the median follow-up for recurrence-free survivors was 14 years. Using a tissue microarray AIB1, ER and PgR were analysed with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Considering the proportion and intensity of stained nuclei, 56% of the tumours were considered as having high AIB1. Data on HER2 status and Nottingham histological grade (NHG) were available. Statistical methods used were X2-test, the Kaplan-Meier method, log rank test and Cox regression.&amp;#x2028; Results: High AIB1 was found to correlate with other factors of worse prognosis (high HER2, high NHG and presence of lymph node metastases), as well as ER- and PgR-negativity. In the control arm, high AIB1 was a negative prognostic factor for RFS by univariate analysis (HR 1.6 p=0.02). In ER+ patients it remained a significant factor also in multivariate analyses including age, NHG, HER2, presence of lymph node metastases and tumour size (HR 1.8 p=0.03).&amp;#x2028; Exploring the treatment predictive effect of AIB1, we found ER+ patients with high AIB1 to respond very well to tamoxifen treatment (HR 0.4 p=0.002), increasing RFS to the same levels as for systemically untreated patients with low AIB1. Statistical significance persisted also in a multivariate analysis (HR 0.3 p&amp;lt;0.001). Using a treatment interaction analysis, adjusted for other prognostic factors as above, we found that in ER+ patients the effect of tamoxifen was three times better in patients with high AIB1 than in those with low AIB1, a statistically significant difference ( p=0.007). ER+ patients with low AIB1 had a better RFS without treatment, but this was not further improved by tamoxifen (HR 0.9 p=0.8).&amp;#x2028; Discussion: In this randomized trial of premenopausal breast cancer patients, we have shown AIB1 to be both a prognostic and a treatment predictive factor in the ER+ subgroup. Previous clinical studies regarding AIB1 have not shown unanimous results. Discrepancies maybe explained by differences in methodology and cut-off, that previous studies were not based on randomized trials, and/or that only premenopausal patients were included in the present study. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6049.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor modulator amplified in breast cancer (AIB1) for predicting clinical outcome after adjuvant tamoxifen in breast cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor (ER) modulator Amplified In Breast cancer-1 (AIB1) have been reported to be of importance for the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We have analyzed AIB1 and EGFR by immunohistochemistry in primary breast cancers (n = 297) arranged in a tissue microarray in order to predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for two years. High expression of AIB1 was associated with DNA-nondiploidy, high S-phase fraction, HER2 amplification, and short term (<or=2 years) distant disease-free survival (DDFS), independent of ER status. High expression of EGFR was strongly associated to ER negativity and also correlated with progesterone receptor negativity, high S-phase fraction, and inversely correlated with nodal metastases. In univariate analysis, high EGFR was associated with shorter DDFS (hazard ratio 2.1; P = 0.017), and reached borderline significance in a multivariate analysis, adjusting for ER, menopausal and lymph node status, tumor size, and HER2 (P = 0.057). In conclusion, both AIB1 and EGFR were associated to DDFS for breast cancer patients treated with two years of adjuvant tamoxifen; AIB1 with the development of early distant recurrences, indicating association between high AIB1 and resistance to tamoxifen during treatment, and EGFR with distant recurrences up to a follow up of five years.

Amplified in Breast Cancer 1 in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Positive Tumors of Tamoxifen-Treated Breast Cancer Patients

Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is a member of the p160/steroid receptor coactivators family and is involved in estrogen-dependent gene transcription by reducing the antagonistic activity of tamoxifen-bound estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha). The present study was carried out to test the hypothesis that AIB1 protein expression and/or gene amplification mediates tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry using AIB1 antibody and fluorescence in situ hybridization using probes specific for AIB1 and chromosome 20 was done on 402 ER-alpha-positive tamoxifen-treated breast cancers. AIB1 overexpression was not associated with relapse during treatment with tamoxifen. In contrast, high AIB1 expression in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2- and HER3-overexpressing tumors or tumors expressing one or more of HER1, HER2, or HER3 (HER1-3 positive) was associated with an increased risk of relapse on tamoxifen [hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.52 (P = 0.0416); hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.43 (P = 0.0030), respectively]. AIB1 gene amplification was observed in 18 of 362 (5%) patients. High AIB1 gene copy number had no effect on overall or disease-free survival. Data presented here support a role for AIB1 expression on relapse during tamoxifen treatment in hormone-responsive HER-expressing clinical breast cancers and support clinical evidence, suggesting a cross-talk between ER-alpha and growth factor receptor pathways through changes in expression of specific coactivator proteins, such as AIB1. This study highlights the potential that tumor profiling, using multiple markers of treatment response, may improve patient selection for endocrine treatment, such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.

Steroid receptor coactivator AIB1 in endometrial carcinoma, hyperplasia and normal endometrium: correlation with clinicopathologic parameters and biomarkers

Members of the p160 steroid receptor cofactor family, including AIB1 (Amplified in Breast Cancer 1) (also known as SRC-3/RAC3/ACTR/pCIP/TRAM-1), are of interest in endometrial carcinoma as they affect the function of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR). Since it is feasible that alterations in the expression levels of coregulators can either augment ER activity or reduce the ability of PR to oppose ER action in endometrial cancers, our primary aim was to analyze expression of the AIB1 protein in endometrial carcinoma, carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia, and carcinoma-associated normal endometrium using immunohistochemistry and tissue microarrays. Expression of AIB1 was compared with other biomarkers and clinicopathologic parameters. We also tested AIB1 expression in non-carcinoma associated hyperplastic, normal secretory and proliferative endometrium to determine baseline AIB1 levels. In endometrial carcinoma, there is a higher expression of AIB1 compared to carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia (0.007) or carcinoma-associated normal endometrium (<0.001). AIB1 expression correlates with older age (P=0.003), peri- or postmenopausal status (P=0.002) and a higher grade of carcinomas (P=0.04). There were no differences in the expression of additional steroid hormone receptor co-activators (SRC-1 and p300/CBP) and the co-repressor SMRT between histologic categories. AIB1 expression correlated with ER (r=0.30, P=0.006). The strongest correlation was between ER and PR-B isoform nuclear expression (r=0.52, P<0.0001). AIB1 levels were higher in non-carcinoma associated normal and hyperplastic endometrium compared to carcinoma-associated complex atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma-associated normal endometrium, and were the highest in normal secretory endometrium. In conclusion, high AIB1 expression in endometrial carcinoma is associated with parameters of poor prognosis. We propose that when AIB1 is overexpressed in endometrial carcinoma, ER action is augmented, leading to endometrial hyperplasia and progression to malignancy. Future studies correlating expression with response to hormonal therapy may be beneficial.