Selenoprotein Hierarchy Research Articles

Metabolism of Selenium, Selenocysteine, and Selenoproteins in Ferroptosis in Solid Tumor Cancers.

A potential target of precision nutrition in cancer therapeutics is the micronutrient selenium (Se). Se is metabolized and incorporated as the amino acid selenocysteine (Sec) into 25 human selenoproteins, including glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) and thioredoxin reductases (TXNRDs), among others. Both the processes of Se and Sec metabolism for the production of selenoproteins and the action of selenoproteins are utilized by cancer cells from solid tumors as a protective mechanism against oxidative damage and to resist ferroptosis, an iron-dependent cell death mechanism. Protection against ferroptosis in cancer cells requires sustained production of the selenoprotein GPX4, which involves increasing the uptake of Se, potentially activating Se metabolic pathways such as the trans-selenation pathway and the TXNRD1-dependent decomposition of inorganic selenocompounds to sustain GPX4 synthesis. Additionally, endoplasmic reticulum-resident selenoproteins also affect apoptotic responses in the presence of selenocompounds. Selenoproteins may also help cancer cells adapting against increased oxidative damage and the challenges of a modified nutrient metabolism that result from the Warburg switch. Finally, cancer cells may also rewire the selenoprotein hierarchy and use Se-related machinery to prioritize selenoproteins that are essential to the adaptations against ferroptosis and oxidative damage. In this review, we discuss both the evidence and the gaps in knowledge on how cancer cells from solid tumors use Se, Sec, selenoproteins, and the Se-related machinery to promote their survival particularly via resistance to ferroptosis.

Ribosome stalling during selenoprotein translation exposes a ferroptosis vulnerability.

The selenoprotein glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) prevents ferroptosis by converting lipid peroxides into nontoxic lipid alcohols. GPX4 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment, but some cancer cells are resistant to ferroptosis triggered by GPX4 inhibition. Using a chemical-genetic screen, we identify LRP8 (also known as ApoER2) as a ferroptosis resistance factor that is upregulated in cancer. Loss of LRP8 decreases cellular selenium levels and the expression of a subset of selenoproteins. Counter to the canonical hierarchical selenoprotein regulatory program, GPX4 levels are strongly reduced due to impaired translation. Mechanistically, low selenium levels result in ribosome stalling at the inefficiently decoded GPX4 selenocysteine UGA codon, leading to ribosome collisions, early translation termination and proteasomal clearance of the N-terminal GPX4 fragment. These findings reveal rewiring of the selenoprotein hierarchy in cancer cells and identify ribosome stalling and collisions during GPX4 translation as ferroptosis vulnerabilities in cancer.

Activation of Nrf2 by Electrophiles Is Largely Independent of the Selenium Status of HepG2 Cells

Selenoenzymes, whose activity depends on adequate selenium (Se) supply, and phase II enzymes, encoded by target genes of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), take part in governing cellular redox homeostasis. Their interplay is still not entirely understood. Here, we exposed HepG2 hepatoma cells cultured under Se-deficient, Se-adequate, or Se-supranutritional conditions to the Nrf2 activators sulforaphane, cardamonin, or diethyl maleate. Nrf2 protein levels and intracellular localization were determined by immunoblotting, and mRNA levels of Nrf2 target genes and selenoproteins were assessed by qRT-PCR. Exposure to electrophiles resulted in rapid induction of Nrf2 and its enrichment in the nucleus, independent of the cellular Se status. All three electrophilic compounds caused an enhanced expression of Nrf2 target genes, although with differences regarding extent and time course of their induction. Whereas Se status did not significantly affect mRNA levels of the Nrf2 target genes, gene expression of selenoproteins with a low position in the cellular “selenoprotein hierarchy”, such as glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1) or selenoprotein W (SELENOW), was elevated under Se-supplemented conditions, as compared to cells held in Se-deficient media. In conclusion, no major effect of Se status on Nrf2 signalling was observed in HepG2 cells.

Selenium-regulated hierarchy of human selenoproteome in cancerous and immortalized cells lines

BackgroundSelenoproteins (25 genes in human) co-translationally incorporate selenocysteine using a UGA codon, normally used as a stop signal. The human selenoproteome is primarily regulated by selenium bioavailability with a tissue-specific hierarchy. MethodsWe investigated the hierarchy of selenoprotein expression in response to selenium concentration variation in four cell lines originating from kidney (HEK293, immortalized), prostate (LNCaP, cancer), skin (HaCaT, immortalized) and liver (HepG2, cancer), using complementary analytical methods. We performed (i) enzymatic activity, (ii) RT-qPCR, (iii) immuno-detection, (iv) selenium-specific mass spectrometric detection after non-radioactive 76Se labeling of selenoproteins, and (v) luciferase-based reporter constructs in various cell extracts. ResultsWe characterized cell-line specific alterations of the selenoproteome in response to selenium variation that, in most of the cases, resulted from a translational control of gene expression. We established that UGA-selenocysteine recoding efficiency, which depends on the nature of the SECIS element, dictates the response to selenium variation. ConclusionsWe characterized that selenoprotein hierarchy is cell-line specific with conserved features. This analysis should be done prior to any experiments in a novel cell line. General significanceWe reported a strategy based on complementary methods to evaluate selenoproteome regulation in human cells in culture.

Delineating hierarchy of selenotranscriptome expression and their response to selenium status in chicken central nervous system

Selenium (Se) incorporated in selenoproteins as selenocysteine and supports various important cellular and organismal functions. We recently reported that chicken brain exhibited high priority for Se supply and retention under conditions of dietary Se deficiency and supernutrition Li et al. (2012) . However, the selenotranscriptome expressions and their response to Se status in chicken central nervous system (CNS) are unclear. To better understand the relationship of Se homeostasis and selenoproteins expression in chicken CNS, 1day-old HyLine White chickens were fed a low Se diet (Se-L, 0.028mg/g) supplemented with 4 levels of dietary Se (0 to 5.0mgSe/kg) as Na2SeO3 for 8weeks. Then chickens were dissected for getting the CNS, which included cerebral cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, bulbus cinereus and marrow. The expressions of selenoproteome which have 24 selenoproteins were detected by the quantitative real-time PCR array. The concept of a selenoprotein hierarchy was developed and the hierarchy of different regions in chicken CNS was existence, especially cerebral cortex and bulbus cinereus. The expression of selenoproteins has a hierarch while changing Se content, and Selenoprotein T (Selt), Selenoprotein K (Selk), Selenoprotein W (Selw), Selenoprotein U (Selu), Glutathione peroxidase 3 (Gpx3), Glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4), Selenoprotein P (Sepp1), Selenoprotein O (Selo), Selenoprotein 15 (Sel15), Selenoprotein N (Seln), Glutathione peroxidase 2 (Gpx2) and Selenoprotein P 2 (Sepp2) take more necessary function in the chicken CNS. Therefore, we hypothesize that hierarchy of regulated the transcriptions of selenoproteome makes an important role of CNS Se metabolism and transport in birds.

Modeling and gene knockdown to assess the contribution of nonsense-mediated decay, premature termination, and selenocysteine insertion to the selenoprotein hierarchy.

The expression of selenoproteins, a specific group of proteins that incorporates selenocysteine, is hierarchically regulated by the availability of Se, with some, but not all selenoprotein mRNA transcripts decreasing in abundance with decreasing Se. Selenocysteine insertion into the peptide chain occurs during translation following recoding of an internal UGA stop codon. There is increasing evidence that this UGA recoding competes with premature translation termination, which is followed by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) of the transcript. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the susceptibility of different selenoprotein mRNAs to premature termination during translation and differential sensitivity of selenoprotein transcripts to NMD are major factors in the selenoprotein hierarchy. Selenoprotein transcript abundance was measured in Caco-2 cells using real-time PCR under different Se conditions and the data obtained fitted to mathematical models of selenoprotein translation. A calibrated model that included a combination of differential sensitivity of selenoprotein transcripts to NMD and different frequency of non-NMD related premature translation termination was able to fit all the measurements. The model predictions were tested using SiRNA to knock down expression of the crucial NMD factor UPF1 (up-frameshift protein 1) and selenoprotein mRNA expression. The calibrated model was able to predict the effect of UPF1 knockdown on gene expression for all tested selenoproteins, except SPS2 (selenophosphate synthetase), which itself is essential for selenoprotein synthesis. These results indicate an important role for NMD in the hierarchical regulation of selenoprotein mRNAs, with the exception of SPS2 whose expression is likely regulated by a different mechanism.

Regulation of Selenium Metabolism and Transport.

Selenium is regulated in the body to maintain vital selenoproteins and to avoid toxicity. When selenium is limiting, cells utilize it to synthesize the selenoproteins most important to them, creating a selenoprotein hierarchy in the cell. The liver is the central organ for selenium regulation and produces excretory selenium forms to regulate whole-body selenium. It responds to selenium deficiency by curtailing excretion and secreting selenoprotein P (Sepp1) into the plasma at the expense of its intracellular selenoproteins. Plasma Sepp1 is distributed to tissues in relation to their expression of the Sepp1 receptor apolipoprotein E receptor-2, creating a tissue selenium hierarchy. N-terminal Sepp1 forms are taken up in the renal proximal tubule by another receptor, megalin. Thus, the regulated whole-body pool of selenium is shifted to needy cells and then to vital selenoproteins in them to supply selenium where it is needed, creating a whole-body selenoprotein hierarchy.

Physiological functions of GPx2 and its role in inflammation‐triggered carcinogenesis

Mammalian glutathione peroxidases (GPxs) are reviewed with emphasis on the role of the gastrointestinal GPx2 in tumorigenesis. GPx2 ranks high in the hierarchy of selenoproteins, corroborating its importance. Colocalization of GPx2 with the Wnt pathway in crypt bases of the intestine and its induction by Wnt signals point to a role in mucosal homeostasis, but GPx2 might also support tumor growth when increased by a dysregulated Wnt pathway. In contrast, the induction of GPx2 by Nrf2 activators and the upregulation of COX2 in cells with a GPx2 knockdown reveal inhibition of inflammation and suggest prevention of inflammation-mediated carcinogenesis. The Janus-faced role of GPx2 has been confirmed in a mouse model of inflammation-associated colon carcinogenesis (AOM/DSS), where GPx2 deletion increased inflammation and consequently tumor development, but decreased tumor size. The model further revealed a GPx2-independent decrease in tumor development by selenium (Se) and detrimental effects of the Nrf2-activator sulforaphane in moderate Se deficiency.

Disruption and complementation of the selenocysteine biosynthesis pathway reveals a hierarchy of selenoprotein gene expression in the archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis

Proteins containing selenocysteine are found in members of all three domains of life, Bacteria, Eukarya and Archaea. A dedicated tRNA (tRNA(sec)) serves as a scaffold for selenocysteine synthesis. However, sequence and secondary structures differ in tRNA(sec) from the different domains. An Escherichia coli strain lacking the gene for tRNA(sec) could only be complemented with the homologue from Methanococcus maripaludis when a single base in the anticodon loop was exchanged demonstrating that this base is a crucial determinant for archaeal tRNA(sec) to function in E. coli. Complementation in trans of M. maripaludis JJ mutants lacking tRNA(sec) , O-phosphoseryl-tRNA(sec) kinase or O-phosphoseryl-tRNA(sec) :selenocysteine synthase with the corresponding genes from M. maripaludis S2 restored the mutant's ability to synthesize selenoproteins. However, only partial restoration of the wild-type selenoproteome was observed as only selenocysteine-containing formate dehydrogenase was synthesized. Quantification of transcripts showed that disrupting the pathway of selenocysteine synthesis leads to downregulation of selenoprotein gene expression, concomitant with upregulation of a selenium-independent backup system, which is not re-adjusted upon complementation. This transcriptional arrest was independent of selenophosphate but depended on the 'history' of the mutants and was inheritable, which suggests that a stable genetic switch may cause the resulting hierarchy of selenoproteins synthesized.

A T/C polymorphism in the GPX4 3′UTR affects the selenoprotein expression pattern and cell viability in transfected Caco-2 cells

BackgroundSynthesis of selenoproteins such as glutathione peroxidases (GPx) requires a specific tRNA and a stem-loop structure in the 3′untranslated region (3′UTR) of the mRNA. A common single nucleotide polymorphism occurs in the GPX4 gene in a region corresponding to the 3′UTR. MethodsThe two variant 3′UTR sequences were linked to sequences from a selenoprotein reporter gene (iodothyronine deiodinase) and expressed in Caco-2 cells. Clones expressing comparable levels of deiodinase (assessed by real-time PCR) were selected and their response to tert-butyl hydroperoxide assessed by cell viability and measurement of reactive oxygen species. Selenoprotein expression was assessed by real-time PCR, enzyme activity and immunoassay. ResultsWhen selenium supply was low, cells overexpressing the C variant 3′UTR showed lower viability after oxidative challenge, increased levels of reactive oxygen species and lower GPx activity and SelH mRNA expression compared to cells overexpressing the T variant. After selenium supplementation, cell viability and GPx4 expression were higher in the cells overexpressing the C variant. Expression of transgenes incorporating the T/C variant GPX4 (rs713041) sequences in Caco-2 cells leads to alterations in both cell viability after an oxidative challenge and selenoprotein expression. This suggests that the two variants compete differently in the selenoprotein hierarchy. General SignificanceThe data provide evidence that the T/C variant GPX4 (rs713041) alters the pattern of selenoprotein synthesis if selenium intake is low. Further work is required to assess the impact on disease susceptibility.

Increasing the level of selenium in rotifers ( Brachionus plicatilis ‘Cayman’) enhances the mRNA expression and activity of glutathione peroxidase in cod ( Gadus morhua L.) larvae

Commercially produced Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua L.) larvae are fed rotifers, while in the wild cod larvae feed on copepods. Rotifers contain up to 30-fold less selenium (Se) than copepods, and may contain insufficient Se to meet cod larvae requirements. In this study, rotifers were fed Se-enriched yeast (Se + rotifers) to obtain copepod levels of Se (3 mg kg − 1 dry weight (DW)), and the effects of feeding the Se + rotifers to cod larvae was investigated and compared to cod larvae fed control rotifers containing 0.7 mg Se kg − 1 DW. No differences were observed in growth or survival between groups at the end of the rotifer-feeding period (29 days post hatch (dph)), or in the rate of skeletal deformities at 120 dph. Cod larvae fed Se + rotifers had increased whole-body levels of Se, and expression and activity of Se-dependent glutathione peroxidases during the rotifer-feeding period (3 to 29 dph) compared to controls. Meanwhile no effect of the treatment was seen in the activity or mRNA expression of the deiodinases. There was no difference in thyroid hormone levels at 29 dph, but the T 3/T 4 ratio was increased in the Se + larvae. Thyroid follicles of Se + larvae had increased total volume, colloid volume and ratios of epithelium to colloid compared to controls. The results demonstrate that Se-dependent enzyme mRNA expression and activities in cod are retained according to a selenoprotein hierarchy as found in other vertebrates, and suggest that rotifers need extra supplementation of Se to meet cod larvae requirements.

Modulation of thioredoxin reductase-2 expression in EAhy926 cells: Implications for endothelial selenoprotein hierarchy

Background We examined the expression of the mitochondrial selenoenzyme TrxR2 in the endothelial cell line EAhy926 under conditions known to modify its cytoplasmic counterpart TrxR1. Methods Cells were cultured with varying concentrations of selenite, sulforaphane or the Ca 2+ ionophore A23187 for 72-h, prior to assay of TrxR concentration and activity. Further cultures underwent prolonged (7-day) Se-depletion before selenoprotein measurement. Results In Se-deficient cultures, neither Se, A23187 or sulforaphane affected TrxR2 concentration, while these treatments induced TrxR1 concentration ( p < 0.05). When co-incubated, optimal concentrations of Se (40 nM) and sulforaphane (4 μM) only modestly increased TrxR2 protein (∼ 1.3-fold), compared with TrxR1 (∼ 4-fold). In Se-deficient cells, TrxR activity was unaffected by sulforaphane or A23187. Prolonged Se-depletion caused a comparatively small reduction in TrxR2 (66% TrxR2 retained) against TrxR1 and glutathione peroxidase-1 activity (38% and 17% retained, respectively). Conclusions The relative resistance of TrxR2 to Se-deprivation and induction by sulforaphane and A23187 suggests TrxR2 lies near the top of the selenoprotein hierarchy in EAhy926 cells and exhibits near maximum expression under a range of culture conditions. In Se deficiency an inactive (possibly truncated) TrxR1 is produced in response to stimulus by sulforaphane and A23187. General significance These observations underpin a likely critical antioxidant role for TrxR2 and TrxR1 in the endothelium.

Assessment of requirements for selenium and adequacy of selenium status: a review.

The intent of this review is to evaluate the scientific evidence for the assessment of adequacy of selenium status and of the requirements for selenium. From this evidence, attempts have been made to define levels of plasma selenium and dietary selenium intake, which could be used for the assessment of deficiency or adequacy of selenium status. The first section briefly reviews the methods for assessment of selenium status. The second section outlines the requirements for selenium based on a number of criteria, and how these have been translated into recommended intakes of selenium. In the final section, levels of plasma selenium and dietary intake based on different criteria of adequacy have been proposed. The minimum requirement for selenium is that which prevents the deficiency disease, Keshan disease. The recommended intakes of selenium have been calculated from the requirement for optimum plasma glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity that must, because of the hierarchy of selenoproteins, also take account of the amounts needed for normal levels of other biologically necessary selenium compounds. Whether optimal health depends upon maximization of GPx or other selenoproteins, however, has yet to be resolved, and the consequences of less-than-maximal GPx activities or mRNA levels need investigation. Intakes, higher than recommended intakes, and plasma selenium concentrations that might be protective for cancer or result in other additional health benefits have been proposed. There is an urgent need for more large-scale trials to assess any such beneficial effects and to provide further data on which to base more reliable estimates for intakes and plasma selenium levels that are protective.

3'UTRs of glutathione peroxidases differentially affect selenium-dependent mRNA stability and selenocysteine incorporation efficiency.

Selenoprotein mRNAs are particular in several aspects. They contain a specific secondary structure in their 3'UTR, called Secis (selenocysteine inserting sequence), which is indispensable for selenocysteine incorporation, and they are degraded under selenium-limiting conditions according to their ranking in the hierarchy of selenoproteins. In the familiy of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidases (GPx) the ranking is GI-GPx > or = PHGPx > cGPx = pGPx. This phenomenon was studied by mutually combining the coding regions of GI-GPx, PHGPx and cGPx with their 3'UTRs. HepG2 cells were stably transfected with the resulting constructs. Expression of glutathione peroxidases was estimated by activity measurement and Western blotting, the selenium-dependent mRNA stability by real-time PCR. Whereas 3'UTRs from stable PHGPx and GI-GPx could be exchanged without loss of stability, they were not able to stabilize cGPx mRNA. cGPx 3'UTR rendered GI-GPx and PHGPx mRNA unstable. Thus, cGPx mRNA contains selenium-responsive instability elements in both the translated and the untranslated region, which cannot be compensated by one of the stable homologs. Stabilizing efficiency of an individual GPx 3'UTR did not correlate with the efficiency of selenocysteine incorporation. PHGPx 3'UTR was equally effective as cGPx 3'UTR in enhancing GPx activity in all constructs, while GI-GPx 3'UTR showed a markedly lower efficacy. We conclude that different mRNA sequences and/or RNA-binding proteins might regulate mRNA stability and translation of selenoprotein mRNA.

Functions of GI-GPx: lessons from selenium-dependent expression and intracellular localization.

Gastro intestinal glutathione peroxidase (GI-GPx) is one of the four distinct mammalian selenoperoxidases. It had been reported to be restricted to the gastrointestinal tract but has more recently been identified also in human liver and some tumor cell lines. GI-GPx ranks high in the hierarchy of selenoproteins. The GI-GPx mRNA rather increases than decreases in selenium deficiency. GI-GPx protein responds poorly to selenium deprivation and increases fast upon resupplementation. Putative biological roles of GI-GPx, e.g. protection against food-born hydroperoxides, redox-regulation of proliferation or apoptosis, and modulation of mucosal immunity, are discussed in the light of cellular and subcellular distribution, transcriptional regulation and observations with k.o. mice.

Tissue-specific functions of individual glutathione peroxidases

The family of glutathione peroxidases comprises four distinct mammalian selenoproteins. The classical enzyme (cGPx) is ubiquitously distributed. According to animal, cell culture and inverse genetic studies, its primary function is to counteract oxidative attack. It is dispensible in unstressed animals, and accordingly ranks low in the hierarchy of glutathione peroxidases. The gastrointestinal isoenzyme (GI-GPx) is most related to cGPx and is exclusively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract. It might provide a barrier against hydroperoxides derived from the diet or from metabolism of ingested xenobiotics. The extreme stability in selenium deficiency ranks this glutathione peroxidase highest in the hierarchy of selenoproteins and points to a more vital function than that of cGPx. Plasma GPx (pGPx) behaves similar to cGPx in selenium deficiency. It is directed to extracellular compartments and is expressed in various tissues in contact with body fluids, e.g., kidney, ciliary body, and maternal/fetal interfaces. It has to be rated as an efficient extracellular antioxidant device, though with low capacity because of the limited extracellular content of potential thiol substrates. Phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx), originally presumed to be a universal antioxidant enzyme protecting membrane lipids, appears to have adopted a variety of specific roles like silencing lipoxygenases and becoming an enzymatically inactive structural component of the mitochondrial capsule during sperm maturation. Thus, all individual isoenzymes are efficient peroxidases in principle, but beyond their mere antioxidant potential may exert cell- and tissue-specific roles in metabolic regulation, as is evident for PHGPx and may be expected for others.

MRNA stability and selenocysteine insertion sequence efficiency rank gastrointestinal glutathione peroxidase high in the hierarchy of selenoproteins.

The recently described gastrointestinal glutathione peroxidase (GI-GPx) is the fourth member of the family of the selenoenzymes glutathione peroxidases (GPx). In contrast to the more uniform distribution of, for example, the classical glutathione peroxidase (cGPx), it is expressed exclusively in the gastrointestinal tract and has, therefore, been suggested to function as a primary barrier against alimentary hydroperoxides. In order to get an idea of its relative importance we investigated its position in the hierarchy of selenoprotein expression. The selenium-dependent expression of GI-GPx was analyzed in comparison with that of other GPx types at the level of mRNA and protein in HepG2 and CaCo-2 cells. Furthermore, the selenocysteine insertion sequence (SECIS) efficiencies of GI-GPx, phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx) and cGPx in response to selenium were determined by a reporter-gene assay in human hepatoma cells and baby hamster kidney cells. GI-GPx mRNA levels increased during selenium deficiency, whereas cGPx mRNA levels decreased and PHGPx mRNA levels remained almost unaffected. In cells grown in selenium-poor media, all GPx-types were low in both activity and immunochemical reactivity. Upon selenium repletion immunoreactive GI-GPx protein reached a plateau after 10 h, whereas cGPx started to be expressed at 24 h and did not reach its maximum level before 3 days. SECIS efficiencies decreased in the order PHGPx > cGPx > GI-GPx. The augmentation of SECIS efficiencies by selenium was highest for cGPx and intermediate for PHGPx, whereas it was marginal for GI-GPx. The high mRNA stability under selenium restriction, the speed of biosynthesis upon selenium repletion and the marginal effect of selenium on the SECIS efficiency indicate that of the GPx isotypes, GI-GPx ranks highest in the hierarchy of selenoproteins and point to a vital role of GI-GPx in the gastrointestinal tract.

Gastrointestinal glutathione peroxidase.

The gastrointestinal glutathione peroxidase (GI-GPx) is the fourth member of the GPx family. In rodents, it is exclusively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, in humans also in liver. It has, therefore, been discussed to function as a primary barrier against the absorption of ingested hydroperoxides. A vital function of GI-GPx can be deduced from the unusual stability of its mRNA under selenium-limiting conditions, the presence of low amounts of GI-GPx protein in selenium deficiency where cGPx is absent, and the fast reappearance of the GI-GPx protein upon refeeding of cultured cells with selenium compared to the slower reappearance of cGPx protein. Furthermore, the Secis efficiency of GI-GPx is low when compared to cGPx and PHGPx. It is, however, almost independent of the selenium status of the cells tested. All these characteristics rank GI-GPx high in the hierarchy of selenoproteins and point to a role of GI-GPx which might be more crucial than that of cGPx, at least in the gastrointestinal system.