Summary. The paper presents a method of investigating seismic surface waves in (two-dimensional) layered media involving lateral heterogeneities. The method combines forward modelling by computation of synthetic seismograms for the disturbed layering and subsequent inversion of the seismogram spectra with respect to the wave modes. In terms of ‘L region’ and ‘R region', denoting the laterally homogeneous regions of the waves before and after propagation across the disturbed region, the method is described as follows. (1) Analytical definition of the wave in the L region. A time-dependent wavelet is assumed at some surface point, and the spatial displacement field corresponding to a free plane surface wave is computed from the eigen-functions of the waveguide. (2) Numerical propagation of the wave across the laterally heterogeneous region. The general heterogeneous wave equation is approximated by a finite difference time marching scheme, where the analytical wave motion enters as initial value. (3) Inversion of seismograms ‘observed’ at a number of locations in the R region. The seismogram Fourier spectra are modelled by a linear combination of modes, contaminated by random noise. Least-squares fitting between the modelled and the observed seismogram spectra yields estimates of the ‘mode participation factors'. The method is applied to Love waves of an elastic upper crustal model composed of a layer (shear velocity β=2.5 km s-1) over a homogeneous substratum (β=3.5 km s-1). Embedded in the surface layer, of 10 km thickness, is an idealized rectangular shaped sediment basin with lateral and vertical dimensions of 15 and 5 km, and a velocity of 0.6 or 0.4 of that of the layer. The initial pulse in the form of a Ricker wavelet is defined to represent a pure fundamental mode, the wavelengths of which vary between 60 and 6 km in the frequency interval 0.05-0.42 Hz ('analysis interval'), the wavelength of maximum spectral amplitude being 15 km. Observations at a distance of 60 km beyond the sediment basin yield the following results. (1) Propagation across the basin gives rise to significant scattering of the fundamental mode energy into the higher modes. The fraction of the Love wave energy transmitted is about 50 per cent for both models (slightly higher for the model of lower velocity contrast). The transmitted Love wave energy density exhibits different behaviour between the two models. For the model of lower velocity contrast, there is an increase with frequency from about 30 to 80 per cent; for the model of higher velocity contrast, there are variations between corresponding values, without a significant frequency trend. (2) Owing to the multimodal character of the Love wave transmitted, the phase velocity estimated from the horizontal phase gradient, differs from the fundamental mode velocity by amounts of up to about 10 per cent. Moreover, phase velocity as well as the seismogram spectral amplitudes are dependent upon the horizontal coordinate. This means that it is generally inadequate to interpret phase velocity (from phase differences) or attenuation (from amplitude ratios) in corresponding subsurface structures in terms of one single mode.
Read full abstract