HER2-negative Advanced Gastric Cancer Research Articles

The real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer (GC).MethodsWe enrolled patients diagnosed with unresectable advanced or metastatic GC who received nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first-line systemic treatment. The combined positive score (CPS), indicating the number of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-stained cells, was utilized. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were graded, and treatment was ceased upon disease progression or intolerance.ResultsA total of 27 patients were included in the study, comprising 15 patients with CPS ≥ 5 and 12 patients with CPS < 5. The objective response rate (ORR) was 55.6%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 74.1%. Patients in the CPS ≥ 5 group exhibited higher ORR and DCR compared to those in the CPS < 5 group. Median PFS and OS were 6.1 months and 14.6 months, respectively; patients with CPS ≥ 5 showed a trend towards better PFS and OS than those with CPS < 5. Most AEs were grade 1–2, with a few instances of grade 3–4 toxicities reported, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia. There were no grade 5 AEs reported in our cohort. Furthermore, 64.7% of patients received subsequent anticancer treatment following disease progression on nivolumab plus chemotherapy.ConclusionsThe results of our study demonstrate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in real-world practice support its adoption as a new standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HER2-negative GC, particularly those with CPS ≥ 5.

Perioperative chemotherapy with nivolumab for HER2-negative locally advanced gastric cancer: a case series

BackgroundNivolumab with chemotherapy has been transformative for metastatic gastric cancer (GC). The potential of this regimen for local tumor control could be utilized for perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced GC with bulky tumors or lymph node metastasis involving other organs.Case presentationFive patients with HER2-negative advanced GC were treated with nivolumab and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. All patients presented with clinical stage III or IVA GC with tumors in contact with either the pancreas or liver. Following chemotherapy, all tumors demonstrated shrinkage, allowing successful radical gastrectomies including four minimally invasive approach without postoperative complications. Four patients avoided combined resection of other organs.ConclusionsPerioperative chemotherapy with nivolumab was effective for local disease control in this case series. This regimen could be a promising treatment approach for locally advanced GC; however, its survival benefits should be evaluated in clinical trials.

First-line (1L) anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer: Real-world evidence from a single Korean center.

83 Background: The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations as first-line (1L) treatment has shown promising outcomes and is now the standard of care for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer. However, real-world evidence supporting this approach as 1L treatment remains limited. Here, we present an analysis of real-world outcomes, comparing 1L anti-PD-1 combined with doublet chemotherapy to the previous standard chemotherapy. Methods: Patient from January 2005 to August 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The study defined the molecular epidemiology cohort (M cohort) as patients with results for HER2, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), mismatch repair (MMR), or PD-L1. HER2-negative patients who received palliative first-line chemotherapy doublet regimens with or without PD-1 inhibitor were included. Survival analysis included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as subgroup analyses for molecular subtypes. Results: Total 3,028 were enrolled in the M cohort. The incidence rates of HER2-positive, EBV-positive, and deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) were 20.0% (606/3028), 3.8% (93/2432), and 4.7% (126/2660), respectively. PD-L1 testing was conducted on 1,394 patients, with 54.3% (1634/3028) having a CPS (Combined Positive Score) of ≥10, and 47.6% (664/1394) having a CPS of ≥1. Among these patients 1,527 had received chemotherapy doublet, and 153 had received chemotherapy doublet with PD-1 inhibitor as their 1L treatment. During a median follow-up of 56.5 months (95% CI,49.9-66.2), patients who had received PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy showed improved PFS (7.1 vs. 6.1 months; Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.64–0.93) and OS (18.1 vs. 14.6 months; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63–1.01) compared to those without it. The benefits in PFS from PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy were particularly notable in patients with deficient MMR status (HR, 0.22 vs. 0.80 in those without PD-1 inhibitor combination; p for interaction &lt;0.05) and in patients with signet ring cell carcinoma histology (HR, 0.58 vs. 0.92 in those without PD-1 inhibitor combination; p for interaction &lt;0.05). Conclusions: We observed real-world efficacy of the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy doublet as 1L treatment for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer, consistent with previous clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer in the Chinese healthcare system

ABSTRACT Background This study compares first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) in China. Methods A Markov state-transition model was developed based on the phase 3 randomized KEYNOTE-859 clinical trial data. The health state utility values and direct medical costs were derived from the KEYNOTE-859 clinical trial, the relevant literature, and local charges. The measured outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model. Results In the base analysis, the incremental effectiveness and cost of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were 0.22 QALYs and $16,627.31, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $76,936.60/QALY, which is higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold in China ($35,864.61/QALY). Subgroup analyses revealed that the ICERs of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were $72,762.68 and $34,813.70 in the populations with PD-L1 CPS of 1 or higher (CPS ≥ 1) and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 (CPS ≥ 10), respectively. Conclusions As first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative GC/GEJC in China, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy is less cost-effective than chemotherapy alone, however, in the CPS ≥ 10 subgroup is more.

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis

ABSTRACT Objective This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China. Methods A partitioned survival approach model was constructed to simulate the progression of HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer and evaluate the outcomes of different treatment strategies. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) to assess the cost associated with each quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess robustness and reliability. Results The analysis conducted in the base case demonstrated that the ICER associated with pembrolizumab was $177405.83/QALY gained in all population. In the subgroup analysis, it was found that individuals with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 and those with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 had ICERs of $152397.06/QALY and $109534.13/QALY, respectively. All ICER values for both the all population groups and the subgroups exceeded the WTP threshold in China. Our analysis shows the robustness of these results, as they remained consistent when input parameters were varied within a ± 25% range. Conclusion The findings of this cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy is not a cost-effective treatment option for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China.

Effectiveness and safety analysis of serplulimab-based regimens in patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer from a real-world retrospective study.

e16058 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are currently the preferred regimen for the treatment of HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer. Serplulimab, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, has been conditionally approved for the treatment of adult advanced gastric cancer. Because of the diverse nature of patients (pts), patient-centered, individualized treatment require accumulation of experience for real-world applications. Methods: We retrospectively studied 42 HER2-negative advanced gastric adenocarcinoma pts whose safety profiles of regimen containing serplulimab could be evaluated from April 2022 to October 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Individualized treatment regimens mainly included serplulimab combined with one or two selected drug(s) from platinum, taxanes, and fluoropyrimidines. Results: Cut-off on January 30th, 2024, 30 pts (71.4%) received serplulimab based regimens as the first line (1L), 12 pts (28.6%) received the second or more line (≥2L) therapy. The characteristics were as follows: the median age, 66 years (range 35-80 years); male/female 33 (78.6%)/9(21.4%); ECOG performance status 0-1/38, ≥2/4. The median follow-up was 5.7 months (range 0.2-22.3 mos). A total of 227 cycles of treatment was administrated with a median of 4 cycles (range 1-17). Among the pts evaluable for RECIST 1.1, ORR and DCR were 42.9% and 69.0% respectively. There were 3 pts with 3 or more metastatic lesions achieved PR. Nine 1L pts and one 2L pt receiving serplulimab combined with dual chemotherapy containing platinum achieved disease control more than a year. We also tracked 11 pts who experienced grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) reaped over 6 months PFS. Two of four pts who stopped immunotherapy but maintained 1 or 2 cycles of original combined chemotherapy obtained PFS for more than a year. Median PFS and DoR have not reached. The most common grade 3/4 AEs was myelosuppression (7.1%), increased aminotransferases (4.7%) and elevated creatinine (2.3%). 15 (35.7%) pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade including aminotransferase elevation, increased creatinine, but no grade 3 or higher irAEs observed. Conclusions: The real-world data analysis shows that serplulimab-based flexibly combination according to patient status, achieving tumor control in diverse pts while ensuring drug safety. We successfully validated the effectiveness and safety of chemo-immunotherapy strategy in real-world practice. [Table: see text]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer: result of a multicenter retrospective study.

Platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is now becoming the standard first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC). In China, paclitaxel has shown good efficacy and tolerability in AGC as an alternative for first-line therapy. Combining ICIs with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy may lead to improved tumor immune microenvironment, but evidence in paclitaxel combing with ICIs as first-line regimen is lacking. This multicenter, retrospective research aims to compare effectiveness and tolerability of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy combined with ICIs versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment of HER2-negative AGC in a real-world setting. Eighty-six patients with HER2-negative AGC were included from 2017 to 2022. Among them, 57 patients received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy plus ICIs, and 29 patients received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy alone. We compared the efficacy and incidence of adverse events between the two therapy options. Significant improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS) (8.77 versus 7.47 months; P=0.04) and median overall survival (OS) (15.70 versus 14.33 months; P=0.04) were observed in the ICIs combined with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy group. The use of ICIs also significantly prolonged the duration of response (DOR) (7.47 versus 4.59 months; P=0.02). Meanwhile, the ICIs plus chemotherapy group demonstrated significantly improved objective response rate (ORR) (50.9% vs. 27.6%; P=0.03) and disease control rate (DCR) (98.3% vs. 82.8%; P=0.01), and the side effects were tolerable. In summary, for HER2-negative AGC, ICIs plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy is effective with mild toxicities, which should be considered as an alternative first-line therapy regimen.

Abstract 4915: Identification and validation of novel prognostic genetic markers in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC) by artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning and machine learning algorithm

Abstract Introduction: Despite advances in anticancer treatments, there has been urgent need to identify novel prognostic markers for HER2-negative AGC. We propose AI based deep learning and machine learning pipeline to explore genetic markers that predict patient response to chemotherapy in HER2-negative AGC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 179 stage IV HER2-negative AGC patients who have been treated with first-line chemotherapy in Yonsei Cancer Center, Korea between 2015 and 2021. In-house targeted sequencing panel data (CancerSCANTM and CancerMaster) were used to identify candidate prognostic markers. DeepSurv was mainly used to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS), which is a deep learning algorithm that can investigate prognostic roles. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to open the deep learning models’ black-box and calculate the importance ranking of gene features. Machine learning models-random survival forest, elastic-net, and lasso-were also investigated to identify potentially meaningful gene variants. To rank the gene features, we calculated variable importance (VIMP) for random survival forest, and penalized regression coefficients for elastic-net and lasso. All deep learning and machine learning models were trained using 5-folds cross-validation in 1,000 iterations of re-sampling bootstrapping with hyperparameter tuning by grid search. To classify responder or non-responder related genetic markers to chemotherapy, we used the signs of averaged penalize coefficients obtained from elastic-net and lasso. Based on the median linear predictor with candidate gene features, patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk group. Results: A total of 7,824 common variants were analyzed and 20 prognostic genetic markers were identified based on the top average values of SHAP, VIMP, and penalized regression coefficients. The top 10 non-responder genetic markers are included as follows: PARP4(p.S873N), CHUK(p.V268I), BARD1(359_365del), CREBBP(p.Y1125F), BARD1(p.P24S), PHLPP2(p.R1312Q), FAT3(p.Q3375R), CASP5(p.T106A), PHLPP2(p.I544V), and PTCH2(p.T988M). Otherwise, the top 10 responder genetic markers are defined as follows: IL7R(p.I66T), NOTCH4(L16delinsLL), FGFR3, BCL2A1(p.G82D), ZNF217(p.T548I), BRCA1(p.K1183R), FANCA(p.A412V), ADGRA2, CDKN2B, and FANCM(p.S175F). The high-risk group had worse PFS compared with low-risk group (median PFS 4.1 vs. 9.1 months; P-value &amp;lt;0.0001). Conclusion: This study showed the potential of AI deep learning and machine learning pipeline that employs an innovate prognostic genetic markers for HER2-negative AGC. Current ongoing analyses of larger cohort with more comprehensive clinical data will be presented. Citation Format: Sejung Park, Seok-Jae Heo, Choong-Kun Lee, Yaeji Lee, Woo Sun Kwon, Jingmin Che, Minseok Kim, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha. Identification and validation of novel prognostic genetic markers in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC) by artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning and machine learning algorithm [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4915.

Development and validation of novel immune-inflammation-based clinical predictive nomograms in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

To explore the predictive value of multiple immune-inflammatory biomarkers including serum VEGFA and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and establish nomograms for predicting the first-line chemotherapeutic efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with this fatal disease. From November 2017 to April 2022, 102 and 34 patients with a diagnosis of HER2-negative AGC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College were enrolled as development and validation cohorts, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical value of the candidate indicators. The variables were screened using LASSO regression analysis. Predictive models were developed using significant predictors and are displayed as nomograms. Baseline VEGFA expression was significantly higher in HER2-negative AGC patients than in nonneoplastic patients and was associated with malignant serous effusion and therapeutic efficacy (all p<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that VEGFA was an independent predictor for first-line therapeutic efficacy and PFS (both p<0.01) and SII was an independent predictor for first-line PFS and OS (both p<0.05) in HER2-negative AGC patients. The therapeutic efficacy model had an R2 of 0.37, a Brier score of 0.15, and a Harrell's C-index of 0.82 in the development cohort and 0.90 in the validation cohort. The decision curve analysis indicated that the model added more net benefits than VEGFA assessment alone. The PFS/OS models had Harrell's C-indexes of 0.71/0.69 in the development cohort and 0.71/0.62 in the validation cohort. The established nomograms integrating serum VEGFA/SII and commonly available baseline characteristics provided satisfactory performance in predicting the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of HER2-negative AGC patients.

Phase I dose-escalation study on irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (HERBIS-4B, OGSG 1106).

The development of triplet regimens for advanced gastric cancer is challenging. The aim of this phase I dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose of the combination of irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer. The 3 + 3 design was adopted. Every 4weeks, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous irinotecan (100-150mg/m2) on day 1 and fixed doses of intravenous cisplatin (60mg/m2) on day 1 and oral S-1 (80mg/m2) on days 1 to 14. Twelve patients were enrolled in two dose level cohorts. In the level 1 cohort (irinotecan 100mg/m2, cisplatin 60mg/m2, and S-1 80mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicity including grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in one of six patients, whereas in the level 2 cohort (irinotecan 125mg/m2, cisplatin 60mg/m2, and S-1 80mg/m2), dose-limiting toxicities including grade 4 neutropenia developed in two of six patients. Thus, the level 1 and 2 doses were determined to be the recommended and maximum tolerated doses, respectively. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (75%; n = 9), anemia (25%; n = 3), anorexia (8%; n = 1), and febrile neutropenia (17%; n = 2). Irinotecan, cisplatin, and S-1 combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 67% with a median progression-free survival and overall survival of 19.3 and 22.4months, respectively. The potential treatment efficacy of this triplet regimen in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer warrants further evaluation, especially in patients requiring intensive chemotherapy.

Efficacy of the low dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia as third-line or later treatment in HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer.

Aim: To observe the efficacy of the low dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia as third-line or later treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 80 eligible patients with HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer admitted to Jingjiang People's Hospital Affiliated with Yangzhou University-from March 2021 to March 2022 were selected, and they were divided into the control group (n = 40, apatinib) and experimental group (n = 40, apatinib plus deep hyperthermia) on the basis of random number table method. The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were monitored, and the efficacy of the two groups was analyzed by referring to Karnofsky performance status (KPS), overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR) before and after treatment. Results: The levels of CEA, CA199, and VEGF in both groups were lower after treatment than before (p < 0.05), and lower (CEA: 8.85 ± 1.36 vs. 12.87 ± 1.23, CA199: 34.19 ± 4.68 vs. 50.11 ± 5.73, VEGF: 124.8 ± 18.03 vs. 205.9 ± 19.91) in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The DCR and KPS of the patients in the experimental group were significantly higher (DCR: 62.50% vs. 40.00%; KPS: 83.25 ± 1.15 vs. 76.25 ± 1.17) than in the control group (p < 0.05). In survival analysis, patients with control group had shorter OS than the experimental group. (median 5.65 vs. 6.50months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.60], p = 0.0396). Conclusion: The application of low-dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia for patients with HER-2 negative gastric cancer who failed second-line treatment should be a promising option.

The gut microbiome affects response of treatments in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

Common treatments for metastatic/unresectable HER2-negative gastric cancer include chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor. However, significant drug resistance exists regardless of the treatment regimen. Patients with metastatic/unresectable HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled. All patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment regimen and were further divided into responders and non-responders according to efficacy evaluation. Metagenomics sequencing were performed to analyze gut microbiome signature of patients receiving different treatments at baseline and throughout treatment. One hundred seventeen patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma receiving chemotherapy alone, anti PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy alone or combined regimen were included in this study. Microbiome signatures related to clinical response are distinct among the three treatment groups. Among which, 14, 8 and 13 species were significantly different between responders and non-responders in immunotherapy, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy group, respectively. Patients with higher relative abundance of Lactobacillus possessed higher microbiome diversity and significantly better response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and had a trend to achieve better progression-free survival. Another cohort of 101 patients has been used as an external validation set to confirm the stability and reliability of these findings. Gut microbiome affects response of treatments in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in a treatment-specific way, immunotherapy plus chemotherapy did not equal to a simple superposition of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Lactobacillus is expected to become a novel choice as an adjuvant agent in promoting the efficacy of immunotherapy in gastric cancer.

GASTric Cancer HER2 Re-Assessment Study 2 (GASTHER2): HER2 Re-assessment for Initially HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients after Progression on First-Line Treatment.

Heterogeneous human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression in gastric cancer may lead to a misdiagnosis of HER2 status. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential for optimal treatment as novel HER2-directed agents are being investigated in various clinical settings. We evaluated the usefulness of HER2 re-assessment following progression on first-line treatment in initially HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. We enrolled 177 patients with baseline HER2-negative AGC and performed HER2 re-assessment after progression on first-line treatment from February 2012 to June 2016 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. The re-assessed HER2 status was analyzed with baseline HER2 status and clinical characteristics. The median age was 54 years (range, 24 to 80 years), and 123 patients (69.5%) were men. Seven patients (4.0%) were HER2-positive on the re-assessment. Patients with baseline HER2 negativity confirmed by a single test (n=100) had a higher HER2-positive re-assessment rate compared to those who had repeated baseline testing (n=77) (5.0% vs. 2.6%). Among the patients with single baseline HER2 testing, the rate was higher in patients with baseline HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ compared to those with IHC 0 (13.4% vs. 3.6%). Overall, 4.0% of patients with baseline HER2-negative AGC were HER2-positive on re-assessment, and the HER2-positive re-assessment rate was higher among patients who had a single test at baseline. HER2 re assessment may be considered for initially HER2-negative patients to determine their eligibility for HER2-directed therapy, particularly if their HER2 negativity was determined by a single test, especially if they had a single baseline HER2 IHC 1+ test.

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the management of previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThe phase 3 CheckMate 649 established superior overall survival of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy (NIVO + chemo) compared with chemotherapy (chemo) alone as a first-line treatment for patients with Her2-negative advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC). This post hoc trial analysis aimed to evaluate the benefit of NIVO + chemo using quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) to further account for quality of life (QoL) in different health states depending on disease progression and treatment toxicity.MethodsUsing data from CheckMate 649, we evaluated the quality-adjusted survival gain associated with NIVO + chemo compared with chemo alone among all randomized patients and repeated similar analyses among those with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Relative Q-TWiST gains of ≥ 10% were predefined as clinically important.ResultsIn all randomized patients, those receiving NIVO + chemo had a mean Q-TWiST gain of 1.8 (95% CI 0.9, 2.7) months compared with those receiving chemo alone. The relative Q-TWiST gain was estimated to be 12.8%. Patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 had greater quality-adjusted survival gain from NIVO + chemo with an estimated Q-TWiST gain of 2.8 (95% CI 1.5, 4.1) months, representing a relative gain of 20.6%. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses with various QoL utility values yielded consistent findings in favor of NIVO + chemo compared with chemo alone. Q-TWiST gain from NIVO + chemo increased with longer duration of follow-up.ConclusionsNIVO + chemo was associated with a statistically significant and clinically important gain in quality-adjusted survival compared with chemo alone among previously untreated patients with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC.

The full management from first-line to third-line treatments in patients with Her-2-negative advanced gastric cancer.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of full management from first-line to third-line treatments in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her-2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). The efficacy and survival time of a total of 126 patients who received the first-line treatment with oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine or fluorouracil), the second-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel, and the third-line treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors between September 2019 and December 2021 were analyzed. A total of 42, 36, and 48 patients received CapeOX, FOLFOX, and SOX as a first-line treatment, respectively. All patients received nab-paclitaxel alone as a second-line treatment. In addition, 31, 56, and 39 patients received nivolumab, sintilimab, and tislelizumab as a third-line treatment, respectively. The median PFS1, median PFS2, and median PFS3 was 6.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.8-7.4], 5.5 months (95% CI, 5.3-5.7), and 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-3.7). The median PFS3 was 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-4.2) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.3-3.7) among the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive and EBV-negative, respectively (P = 0.09). In addition, the median PFS3 was 4.2 months (95% CI,3.6-4.7) and 3.5 months (95% CI, 3.3-3.6) in the patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 and CPS <5, respectively (P = 0.02). The median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI, 17.2-18.1). The multivariate analysis showed that the two parameters were associated with a significantly longer OS: number of metastatic sites <3 and PD-L1 CPS ≥5. The patients who received three lines of treatment had a long survival time, and the efficacy of immunotherapy was not affected by the EBV subtypes in advanced GC. The toxicity was managed, and the concept of full management needs to be confirmed in the future.

The first report of K-Umbrella Gastric Cancer Study: An open label, multi-center, randomized, biomarker-integrated trial for second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

4001 Background: To explore proper agents for AGC patients as 2nd-line treatment based on optimal biomarker, we conducted K-Umbrella GC study with standard of care (SOC) controlled umbrella trial design. Methods: HER2-negative AGC patients from 6 Korean cancer centers were centrally screened for druggable targets by IHC and in situ hybridization. Patients were randomized to the biomarker vs. control group with SOC as 4:1 ratio. In the biomarker group, patients were treated with specific targeted agents in combination with weekly paclitaxel; 1) EGFR 2+/3+ patients for pan-ERBB inhibitor (afatinib; EGFR cohort), 2) PTEN loss/null (H-score &lt;100) patients for PIK3Cβ inhibitor (GSK2636771; PTEN cohort), and 3) PD-L1+, dMMR/MSI-high, or EBV-related cases for anti-PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab; NIVO cohort). Control group and NONE cohort in biomarker group without predefined biomarkers were treated with SOC (weekly Paclitaxel±Ramucirumab). Primary endpoint was PFS between control and biomarker groups. Secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety of each cohort. Results: Between Feb 2016 and Feb 2021, total 722 patients were centrally screened. 329 patients were enrolled and randomized to control group (n=63) or biomarker group (n=266; EGFR cohort n=67; PTEN cohort n=42; NIVO cohort n=54; NONE cohort n=103). With a median follow-up of 35 months (95%CI 26.1-55.3), median PFS and OS were 3.8 (95%CI 3.2-4.3) and 8.9 (95%CI 7.8-10.1) months for biomarker group and 4.1 (95%CI 3.0-4.8) and 8.7 months (95%CI 7.2-10.2) for control group. In control group, PTEN loss/null was poor prognostic marker; patients with PTEN loss/null (n=12) showed worse survival compared to PTEN intact patients (n=51) (mPFS, 2.8 vs 4.3 months, P=0.03; mOS, 8.7 vs 9.1 months), where other biomarkers showed similar prognosis. Afatinib for EGFR cohort or GSK2636771 for PTEN cohort did not show significant survival benefit compared to control group (Table). Among patients with immune-related biomarkers, addition of nivolumab showed durable survival benefit (mOS 12.0 vs 7.6 months, P=0.08) compared to SOC. Conclusions: Considering the characteristics of umbrella design with multiple biomarkers having different biological roles, biomarker group did not show the improved survival over control arm with these 3 drugs. For optimal biomarker-driven targeted agent applications, NGS-based biomarker driven K-Umbrella GC-2 study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02951091. [Table: see text]

Tumor-Infiltrating Neutrophils and Non-Classical Monocytes May Be Potential Therapeutic Targets for HER2negative Gastric Cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. The classification of advanced GC (AGC) according to molecular features has recently led to effective personalized cancer therapy for some patients. Specifically, AGC patients whose tumor cells express high levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) can now benefit from trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal Ab that targets HER2. However, patients with HER2negative AGC receive limited clinical benefit from this treatment. To identify potential immune therapeutic targets in HER2negative AGC, we obtained 40 fresh AGC specimens immediately after surgical resections and subjected the CD45+ immune cells in the tumor microenvironment to multi-channel/multi-panel flow cytometry analysis. Here, we report that HER2 negativity associated with reduced overall survival (OS) and greater tumor infiltration with neutrophils and non-classical monocytes. The potential pro-tumoral activities of these cell types were confirmed by the fact that high expression of neutrophil or non-classical monocyte signature genes in the gastrointestinal tumors in The Cancer Genome Atlas, Genotype-Tissue Expression and Gene Expression Omnibus databases associated with worse OS on Kaplan-Meir plots relative to tumors with low expression of these signature genes. Moreover, advanced stage disease in the AGCs of our patients associated with greater tumor frequencies of neutrophils and non-classical monocytes than early stage disease. Thus, our study suggests that these 2 myeloid populations may serve as novel therapeutic targets for HER2negative AGC.

The association of ABCC5 and ABCC11 polymorphisms with the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients

Objective: Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most commonly used drugs to treat cancer, but 5-FU and its forms are characterized by wide inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. ABCC5 and ABCC11 are members of the ABC transporter superfamily and play a role in the efflux of antineoplastic drugs like 5-FU.&#x0D; Methods: The influence of two SNPs in ABCC5 (rs562, T&gt;C) and ABCC11 (rs17822931, G&gt;A) was evaluated based on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 5-FU in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer patients treated with cisplatin and 5-FU (n=18). The genetic variants and plasma 5-FU concentrations were detected by RT-PCR and HPLC, respectively. &#x0D; Results: There was no statistically significant difference between 5-FU AUC0-96 h values and ABCC5 (rs562; T&gt;C), 21.04 ±3.46 vs 16.65 μg.h/mL, p=0,261) and ABCC11 (rs17822931; G&gt;A), 17.04 ±4.39 vs 54 ±3.79 mg.h/L, p=0,564) variants. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences between the variants and the most frequently observed side effects of diarrhea and mucositis.&#x0D; Conclusion: We recommend investigating the noted SNPs more precisely in a larger study population with more comprehensive evaluation.

Targeting the histone demethylase PHF8-mediated PKCα-Src-PTEN axis in HER2-negative gastric cancer

Targeted treatments for advanced gastric cancer (GC) are needed, particularly for HER2-negative GC, which represents the majority of cases (80 to 88%). In this study, in silico analyses of the lysine histone demethylases (KDMs) involved in diverse biological processes and diseases revealed that PHD finger protein 8 (PHF8, KDM7B) was significantly associated with poor clinical outcome in HER2-negative GC. The depletion of PHF8 significantly reduced cancer progression in GC cells and in mouse xenografts. PHF8 regulated genes involved in cell migration/motility based on a microarray analysis. Of note, PHF8 interacted with c-Jun on the promoter of PRKCA which encodes PKCα. The depletion of PHF8 or PKCα greatly up-regulated PTEN expression, which could be rescued by ectopic expression of a PKCα expression vector or an active Src. These suggest that PTEN destabilization occurs mainly via the PKCα-Src axis. GC cells treated with midostaurin or bosutinib significantly suppressed migration in vitro and in zebrafish models. Immunohistochemical analyses of PHF8, PKCα, and PTEN showed a positive correlation between PHF8 and PKCα but negative correlations between PHF8 and PTEN and between PKCα and PTEN. Moreover, high PHF8-PKCα expression was significantly correlated with worse prognosis. Together, our results suggest that the PKCα-Src-PTEN pathway regulated by PHF8/c-Jun is a potential prognostic/therapeutic target in HER2-negative advanced GC.

Pembrolizumab (pembro) versus standard of care chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Asian subgroup analysis of KEYNOTE-062.

4523 Background: First-line treatment with pembro or pembro + chemo vs chemo alone was evaluated in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in the randomized, active-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-062 study (NCT02494583). We present results from the Asian subpopulation receiving pembro monotherapy or chemo. Methods: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to pembro 200 mg, pembro + chemo (cisplatin + 5-FU or capecitabine), or placebo + chemo every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles (~2 years). Randomization was stratified by region, disease status, and fluoropyrimidine treatment. Primary end points for this analysis were overall survival (OS) in patients with CPS ≥1 and patients with CPS ≥10; progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were exploratory end points. Data cutoff was March 26, 2019. Results: Globally, 256 patients received pembro monotherapy and 250 received chemo. Pembro was noninferior to chemo for OS in CPS ≥1 per prespecified margins (median OS, 10.6 vs 11.1 months, respectively; HR [99.2% CI], 0.91 [0.69-1.18]). In the Asian population 62 patients received pembro and 61 received chemo; 26 and 22 had CPS ≥10 (Table). Compared with the global population, Asian patients had a higher proportion of ECOG performance status 0, more diagnoses of stomach cancer, and a greater proportion with 0-2 metastatic sites. Median OS was longer with pembro than chemo using both CPS cutoffs (HR [95% CI]: CPS ≥1, 0.54 [0.35-0.82]; CPS ≥10, 0.43 [0.21-0.89]); 12- and 24-month OS rates were higher for pembro using both CPS cutoffs (12-month OS: CPS ≥1, 69% vs 54%; CPS ≥10, 81% vs 68%; 24-month OS: CPS ≥1, 45% vs 23%; CPS ≥10, 54% vs 27%). The HR (95% CI) for PFS was 1.11 (0.76-1.64) for CPS ≥1 and 0.71 (0.36-1.39) for CPS ≥10. Conclusions: In Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer, OS favored pembro in patients with CPS ≥1 and CPS ≥10. Clinical trial information: NCT02494583 . [Table: see text]