HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Research Articles

Abstract PO4-20-11: Excellent Response to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in “HER-2 Low” Leptomeningeal Breast Cancer and Diagnostic and Monitoring Utility of CNSide Assay

Abstract A 72-year-old female presented to the emergency department with sudden onset of imbalance and cognitive decline. Two years ago, she was diagnosed with stage III estrogen receptor (ER) positive, progesterone receptor (PR) negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (immunohistochemistry score: 0) invasive breast cancer. She subsequently underwent lumpectomy, adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. She had been taking adjuvant letrozole at the time of presentation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed obstructive hydrocephalus without any parenchymal lesion or leptomeningeal enhancement. MRI of spine, computerized tomography of chest/abdomen/pelvis and bone scan were unrevealing except a left adrenal mass which was equivocal for metastasis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed rare malignant cells. Based on the morphology of malignant cells and the patient’s prior history of breast cancer, the diagnosis of leptomeningeal disease with breast primary was made. There were insufficient cells for additional studies. CNSide, a microfluidic platform that uses antibody capture method to detect CSF tumor cells, showed 4678 tumor cells per milliliter (ml) of CSF. Immunocytochemistry of these cells showed that the cells were ER negative (criterion: < 2.6% ER positive cells) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative (criterion: < 3.4% PD-L1 positive cells). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing showed 22% of tumor cells with HER2 amplification (either HER2 to CEP17 ratio >/= 2.0 or HER2 copy number >/= 6). She underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement with complete recovery of her neurological symptoms. Five weeks later, she was started on trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) mainly because of the HER2 FISH results from CNSide. She did not receive central nervous system(CNS) irradiation due to complete resolution of neurological symptoms with VP shunt placement. After two cycles of T-DXd, MRI brain showed mild leptomeningeal enhancement along bilateral superior cerebellar sulci. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT) scan showed a new sclerotic rib focus, thought to represent treatment response. It also showed decrease in size of the adrenal mass. The adrenal mass was hypermetabolic on PET, consistent with malignancy. CSF cytology was negative, while CSF tumor cell count significantly reduced to 6.72 cells/ml using CNSide. There were no new neurological symptoms. Despite MRI brain findings, she was continued on T-DXd given overall favorable clinical, radiological and CSF data. After 7th cycle of T-DXd, repeat CSF cytology continued to remain negative, CNSide CSF tumor cell count decreased further to 6.27 cells/ml, MRI brain showed interval resolution of prior leptomeningeal enhancement, CT scan showed further decrease in size of the adrenal mass (baseline 5.4cm to 3cm), stable rib sclerotic lesion and no additional metastatic lesion. To date, she has undergone eight cycles of T-DXd which has effectively controlled her disease for a period of seven months. She has not needed VP shunt revision and continues to do well. To our knowledge, this is the first case demonstrating the activity of T-DXd against CSF tumor cells where a small subset exhibited HER2 amplification. This case also highlights the benefits of using advanced and highly sensitive CSF assays to diagnose and surveil leptomeningeal disease and to assess HER2 signaling. This case is well-timed especially in the era of next-generation, CNS penetrating, potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate like T-DXd which can mount antitumor activity even with minimal HER2 expression in tumors. Citation Format: Sarah Stanford, Zeni Kharel, Lauryn Hemminger, Tyler Schmidt, Sara Hardy, Jason Zittel, Nimish Mohile, Ajay Dhakal. Excellent Response to Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in “HER-2 Low” Leptomeningeal Breast Cancer and Diagnostic and Monitoring Utility of CNSide Assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-11.

Clinical application of the HM-1000 image processing for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization signal quantification in breast cancer

BackgroundAccurate quantification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification is important for predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of HER2 status, particularly in cases with equivocal status on immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, but has some limitations of non-classical amplifications and such cases are diagnosed basing on additional IHC and FISH. This study investigated the clinical utility of a novel super-resolution fluorescence microscopy technique for the better FISH signal visualization and HER2 FISH classification.MethodsFourteen breast cancer tissue samples were retrospectively collected between September 2018 and February 2022, and FISH HER2 signal quantification was evaluated by determining the HER2/chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) ratio and the number of HER2 signals per nucleus in super- versus conventional-resolution images.ResultsSuper-resolution images maintained the same overall HER2 diagnosis from routine, but HER2 FISH amplification changed negative to monosomy in two cases. Two Letrozole non-response relapses coincided to monosomy samples. The median number of HER2 signals per nucleus was 7.5 in super-resolution images and 4.0 in conventional-resolution images in HER2-positive samples and 2.8 and 2.1 signals per nucleus, respectively, in HER2-negative samples.ConclusionsSuper-resolution images improved signal visualization, including a significant difference in the number of countable HER2 and CEP17 signals in a single nucleus compared with conventional-resolution images. Increased accuracy of signal quantification by super-resolution microscopy may provide clinicians with more detailed information regarding HER2 FISH status that allows to better FISH classification such as HER2-low samples.

Response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive invasive breast cancers with different HER2 FISH patterns

AimsHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients with breast cancer may have different HER2/CEP17 ratios and HER2 copy numbers, with inconsistent responses to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Our study...

TROP-2, NECTIN-4 and predictive biomarkers in sarcomatoid and rhabdoid bladder urothelial carcinoma.

The surface protein TROP-2/TACSTD2 and the cell adhesion protein NECTIN-4/NECTIN4 are responsible for the efficacy of anticancer therapies based on antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) targeting intracellular microtubules. In contrast with common histologic subtypes of bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC), little is known of TROP-2 and NECTIN-4 expression in sarcomatoid and rhabdoid BUC. In this study, we aimed to analyze TROP-2 and NECTIN-4 expression and additional predictive biomarkers by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on 35 undifferentiated BUC (28 sarcomatoid and 7 rhabdoid). Wide genomic investigation was also performed on 411 BUC cases of the PanCancer Atlas, focusing on genes related to the microtubule pathways. Seven of 35 (20%) undifferentiated BUC showed expression of TROP-2. NECTIN-4 was expressed in 10 cases (29%). Seven cases (20%) co-expressed TROP-2 and NECTIN-4. HER-2 FISH was amplified in 5 cases (14%) while HER-2 immunoexpression was observed in 14 cases (40%). PD-L1 scored positive for combined proportion score (CPS) in 66% of cases and for tumor proportion score (TPS) in 51% of cases. Pan-NTRK1-2/3 was elevated in 9 cases (26%) and FGFR-2/3 was broken in 7 of 35 cases (20%). Of 28 sarcomatoid BUC, 9 (32%) were negative for all (TROP-2, NECTIN-4, PD-L1, HER-2, FGFR and pan-NTRK) biomarkers and 3 (11%) expressed all five biomarkers. Among cases with rhabdoid dedifferentiation, 1 of 7 (14%) showed activation of all biomarkers, whereas 2 of 7 (28%) showed none. The mRNA analysis identified microtubule-related genes and pathways suitable for combined ADC treatments in BUC. Sarcomatoid and rhabdoid BUC do harbor positive expression of the ADC targets TROP-2 or NECTIN-4 in a relatively modest subset of cases, whereas the majority do not. Different combinations of other positive biomarkers may help the choice of medical therapies. Overall, these findings have important clinical implications for targeted therapy for BUC.

Are There More HER2 FISH in the Sea? An Institution’s Experience in Identifying HER2 Positivity Using Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Patients with HER2 Negative Immunohistochemistry

BackgroundApproximately 20% of breast cancers express HER2-positive receptors in the USA. HER2 receptor immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining with equivocal (2+) results commonly undergoes fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for further classification. Current guidelines do not recommend routine FISH testing in IHC-negative (0 or 1+) cases. This study investigates an institution that performs both IHC and FISH testing on all cases to identify the true HER2-positive rate.Patients and MethodsA retrospective chart review from 2015 to 2021 was conducted at an institution where both HER2 IHC and FISH testing were performed at the time of diagnosis for all invasive breast cancers. The rate of true HER2-positive patients was determined, and patient and tumor characteristics were further explored.ResultsA total of 1835 invasive breast cancer cases were primarily treated at this institution. A total of 289 cases were HER2 positive on IHC and FISH testing (15.7%). An additional 38 cases were identified as HER2 negative on IHC, but reclassified as HER2 positive on reflex FISH testing. Total HER2 positive cases increased from 289 (15.7%) to 327 cases (17.8%) with reflex FISH testing.ConclusionsThe additional HER2-positive cases after completing FISH testing on IHC-negative tumors suggests there may be a role for routine FISH testing in addition to standard IHC staining to determine HER2 status for breast cancer. The ethical, prognostic and even benefits of a correct diagnosis outweigh the added expense of FISH testing.

Clinicopathologic Features of Breast Carcinoma With 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Group 3 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Chromosome 17 Centromere Ratio <2.0 and Average Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Copy Number ≥6.0) Breast Cancers

Context.— The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 update of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline includes a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) group with a HER2 to chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) ratio less than 2.0 and HER2 copy number 6.0 or greater (group 3), which requires integrated review of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC). Objective.— To assess the clinicopathologic features of group 3 patients and determine features associated with HER2-positive status after workup. Design.— Cases submitted for HER2 FISH between January 2019 and June 2022 were identified, and relevant clinicopathologic information was obtained. Results.— One hundred forty-two HER2 FISH cases (1.6%) were group 3. In 52 cases (36.6%) IHC was negative (0/1+), in 3 (2.8%) IHC was positive (3+), and in 86 (60.6%) IHC was 2+. Annotated IHC 2+ slides were recounted by a second reviewer in targeted areas, where 16 of 86 (18.6%) had a HER2:CEP17 ratio less than 2.0 and a HER2 copy number of 4.0 or greater to less than 6.0 (HER2 negative). After combined IHC/FISH review, 74 of 142 (52.1%) were classified as HER2 positive. HER2 copy number/cell was higher in HER2-positive compared with HER2-negative cases after the workup. The extent and intensity of staining in IHC 2+ cases did not correlate with the level of gene amplification. Twenty percent of HER2-positive patients achieved pathologic complete response. Conclusions.— About half of group 3 cases were classified as HER2 positive after additional workup. Pathologic complete response rates in HER2-positive cases were lower than expected for group 1 (HER2:CEP17 ratio ≥2.0; HER2 copy number ≥4.0) patients. IHC targeted FISH recounts may be redundant and may potentially lead to classification of some patients as HER2 negative, resulting in withholding of targeted therapy.

Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and

To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test. The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR- cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system. Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies.

HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines are used for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) reporting in breast carcinoma. Cases that demonstrate weak to moderate complete membrane immunohistochemical staining in >10% of the tumor are scored as 2+ (equivocal). This study aimed to determine what proportion of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score = 2+ breast carcinomas were confirmed to be positive by HER2 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). There were 241 HER2 IHC score = 2+ breast carcinomas included. Most (74.3%) carcinomas were estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive. Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (89.2%) was the commonest histologic subtype. Most tumors were grade 2 (64.3%). As per the FISH report, at the time of diagnosis, 27 cases (11.2%) were HER2 FISH positive. All HER2 FISH equivocal cases and one FISH positive case assessed using the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 criteria were reclassified to HER2 FISH negative when the 2018 criteria were applied. There was a high level of agreement (κ = 0.979) between HER2 FISH results obtained using the 2013 and the 2018 criteria. This study provides insight into the frequency of HER2 FISH positivity (11.2%) among HER2 IHC score = 2+ breast carcinomas and the impact of modifications to the ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines. Elimination of the HER2 FISH equivocal category by the 2018 guidelines has reduced the need for repeat testing and simplified clinical management. Reclassification of previous HER2 FISH positive to negative has resulted in some patients being ineligible for costly anti-HER therapy.

HER2/ ERBB2 Immunohistochemical Expression and Copy Number Status in Ovarian Mucinous Tumors.

Primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian epithelial cancer, which is often refractory to chemotherapy. HER2-targeting therapy is being increasingly considered in gynecologic malignancies. Although there have been limited studies examining the HER2 status of such tumors, the criteria for HER2 expression scoring have not been standardized for MOC as it has for other sites. This study aimed to survey immunohistochemical HER2 expression patterns in MOC and its precursor, mucinous borderline tumor in correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 was performed on 12 cases of MOC and 15 mucinous borderline tumors, including 7 with intraepithelial carcinoma. HER2 expression was quantified using the gastric/gastroesophageal carcinoma protocol. Cases were considered 3+ if the tumor cells displayed strong complete or basolateral/lateral membranous staining in ≥10% of tumor cells. Cases (2+) had weak to moderate staining in ≥10% of tumor cells. Cases (1+) had faint staining in ≥10% of tumor cells. Cases considered 0 had no staining or faint staining in <10% of tumor cells. HER2 expression was also quantified with the endometrial serous carcinoma protocol, which uses a 30% tumor cell positivity cutoff. FISH for HER2 was performed on all 3+ and 2+ and a subset of 1+ cases. Of the MOC cases, 25% were 3+ and 1 mucinous borderline tumor with intraepithelial carcinoma had 3+ staining. All 3+ IHC MOC cases had >30% basolateral membranous staining. HER2 amplification was confirmed by FISH on all 3+ IHC cases and in one 2+ IHC case of MOC. Up to 25% of mucinous ovarian tumors showed HER2 IHC overexpression with an excellent correlation between IHC and FISH using the HER2 scoring protocol for either gastric/gastroesophageal carcinoma or uterine serous carcinoma.

ERBB2 (HER2) gene amplification concordance analysis of circulating tumor cells and tumor tissue in patients with breast cancer.

e13047 Background: HER2 targeted therapies, such as HER2 monoclonal antibodies, HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and HER2 antibody drug conjugates, are approved for the treatment of HER2-positive breast, gastric and colorectal cancers. However, inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in HER2 status presented a significant challenge in identifying patients that may benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. Detection of ERBB2 amplification in Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) may circumvent tissue heterogeneity issues and effectively predict the response of patients to anti-HER2 agents as a non-invasive alternative approach. Methods: A twenty-four patient pilot study was designed to compare HER2 status of traditional needle biopsies to high sensitivity CTC based liquid biopsies. HER2 status was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) for tissue samples and FISH analysis for CTCs. Currently 21 patient samples have been compared in this study. Results: CTCs with HER2 amplified signals were found in patients with stages 2, 3, or 4 breast cancers. Based on the biopsies of the primary tumor or metastatic disease, 6 patients (29%) had HER2-overexpressing as defined by either HER2 IHC 3+ or HER2 FISH amplified. Analysis of CTCs showed 100% concordance (HER2 amplification detected in CTCs) in these patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Furthermore, an additional 4 (19%) patients had HER2 amplification by CTC analysis but not on needle biopsy. Conclusions: Our finding demonstrates that LiquidScan can be used as a rapid analysis tool to evaluate HER2 amplification in CTCs. This approach can potentially help identify additional cohort of patients (HER2 non-amplified tumor / HER2 amplified CTCs) who may benefit from the new generation of HER2 targeted therapies. Studies are ongoing to include an expanded cohort of patients with early stage disease, as well as HER2-low disease, in order to evaluating dynamics of ERBB2 gene amplification, expression, and pathway activation while on active systemic therapy.

Detection of ERBB2 and CEN17 signals in fluorescent in situ hybridization and dual in situ hybridization for guiding breast cancer HER2 target therapy

The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a predictive biomarker in therapeutic effects for metastatic breast cancer. Accurate HER2 testing is critical for determining the most suitable treatment for patients. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual in situ hybridization (DISH) have been recognized as FDA-approved methods to determine HER2 overexpression. However, analysis of HER2 overexpression is challenging. Firstly, the boundaries of cells are often unclear and blurry, with large variations in cell shapes and signals, making it challenging to identify the precise areas of HER2-related cells. Secondly, the use of sparsely labeled data, where some unlabeled HER2-related cells are classified as background, can significantly confuse fully supervised AI learning and result in unsatisfactory model outcomes. In this study, we present a weakly supervised Cascade R-CNN (W-CRCNN) model to automatically detect HER2 overexpression in HER2 DISH and FISH images acquired from clinical breast cancer samples. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed W-CRCNN achieves excellent results in identification of HER2 amplification in three datasets, including two DISH datasets and a FISH dataset. For the FISH dataset, the proposed W-CRCNN achieves an accuracy of 0.970±0.022, precision of 0.974±0.028, recall of 0.917±0.065, F1-score of 0.943±0.042 and Jaccard Index of 0.899±0.073. For DISH datasets, the proposed W-CRCNN achieves an accuracy of 0.971±0.024, precision of 0.969±0.015, recall of 0.925±0.020, F1-score of 0.947±0.036 and Jaccard Index of 0.884±0.103 for dataset 1, and an accuracy of 0.978±0.011, precision of 0.975±0.011, recall of 0.918±0.038, F1-score of 0.946±0.030 and Jaccard Index of 0.884±0.052 for dataset 2, respectively. In comparison with the benchmark methods, the proposed W-CRCNN significantly outperforms all the benchmark approaches in identification of HER2 overexpression in FISH and DISH datasets (p<0.05). With the high degree of accuracy, precision and recall , the results show that the proposed method in DISH analysis for assessment of HER2 overexpression in breast cancer patients has significant potential to assist precision medicine.

HER2 IHC Expression and Gene Amplification in p53-aberrant High-grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Suggests That This Population May Benefit From HER2 Testing and Targeted Therapy.

Among gynecologic cancers, uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has been shown to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplified and trastuzumab has been included in the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for treatment of advanced stage or recurrent USC with HER2 overexpression/amplification. There is limited literature suggesting that a subset of high-grade endometrioid carcinomas with aberrant p53 expression may also be HER2 amplified and these patients could benefit from the addition of targeted therapy. We identified 59 p53-aberrant (mismatch repair proficient) FIGO 3 endometrioid carcinomas of the uterus. HER2 immunohistochemistry was performed in all 59 tumors and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in 52 of the 59 cases. Four of the 59 cases were HER2 3+ by immunohistochemistry (6.7%), using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2007, 2013, and 2018 criteria. HER2 FISH was performed in 3 of the 4 cases and was amplified in all 3. Nine, 8, and 7 tumors showed 2+ HER2 staining when applying 2018, 2013, and 2007 criteria, respectively, FISH was performed in 7 tumors and none were amplified. An additional 4 cases did not perfectly meet the 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria but were assigned a score of 2+, none were amplified by HER2 FISH. The remaining 42 cases showed 1+ or no staining for HER2, FISH was successfully performed in 38 tumors and none showed amplification. Approximately half of the tumors fulfilled criteria for HER2-low or HER2-very low (10 HER2-low and 20 HER2-very low). Our data shows that a subset of p53-aberrant high-grade endometrial endometrioid carcinoma express HER2 and these patients may benefit from the addition of targeted therapy. The role of targeted therapy in HER2-low gynecologic carcinoma is currently unexplored.

Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption of evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. To perform human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these cases, only 8% (10 of 125) had discordances with clinical impact that could be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review of cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.

A207 CLONAL PATTERNS BETWEEN POUCH NEOPLASIA AND PRIOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS: AN EXPLORATORY COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with an ileo-anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) bear an increased risk of pouch neoplasia, with prior colorectal neoplasia as the strongest predictor. It is unknown if pouch neoplasia develops independently or is derived from prior colorectal neoplasia. Purpose We aimed to assess potential clonality between prior colorectal neoplasia and pouch neoplasia in IPAA patients with IBD. Method In this explorative study we used the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank to identify IBD patients with both pouch neoplasia and colorectal neoplasia prior to colectomy. Clonality was assessed on colonic tissue of the lesion with shallow whole genome sequencing based copy number aberration (CNA) analysis and validated with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Result(s) We included 13 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three patients showed matching clonality CNA profiles between prior colorectal neoplasia and pouch neoplasia, validated with matching IHC and FISH for p19 and HER2. Patients with matching clonal samples also showed on retrospective review concordant histology of the neoplastic lesion pre- and post IPAA, positive resection margins, metastasized disease or a short interval (&amp;lt;2 years) between colorectal and pouch neoplasia diagnoses. Image Conclusion(s) Three patients showed matching clonality patterns of neoplastic lesions, confirmed by clinical and histological data. Most pouch neoplasia in our cohort were molecularly different from their prior colorectal neoplasia. CNA provides a feasible method for clonality assessment in patients with colorectal neoplasia and subsequent pouch neoplasia. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Breast Cancer With a HER2 FISH Group 2 Result: Should HER2 Tests be Repeated?

BackgroundBreast cancer with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) group 2 pattern (HER2 <4 and HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2, a subset of monosomy CEP17) was historically considered HER2-positive, but mostly HER2-negative according to updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines unless 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Therapeutic relevance of this group remained elusive, therefore we assessed if repeat IHC and FISH can assist final HER2 classification. Patient and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2014 to 2018 and identified 23 of 3554 (0.6%) breast cancer cases with at least one-time measurement of HER2 FISH categorized as group 2. Repeat HER2 tests were performed for cases with available alternative tumor samples and compared with initial testing following 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. ResultsOnly 1 of 23 group 2 cases was HER2-positive, 0/18 in primary and 1/5 in metastatic/recurrent tumors. Of 13 primary tumors with repeat HER2 results; 10 (77%) remained HER2-negative; 3 (23%) changed from HER2-negative (group 2 and IHC 2+) to HER2-positive (group 1 and IHC 2+). Among 8 of these 13 patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy containing anti-HER2 agent, 3 (38%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). Two of 3 pCR cases were HER2-positive converters on repeat testing. Three pCR cases were ER-negative or -low positive and Ki67 ≥40%, while 5 partial responders were ER-positive and Ki67 <40% (P < .05). ConclusionBreast cancer with HER2 FISH group 2 result may represent heterogeneous populations of tumor cells being originated de novo or preferentially selected secondary to therapy. Repeat HER2 tests on alternative samples may be considered to guide anti-HER2 therapy.

P199 Clonal patterns between pouch neoplasia and prior colorectal neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients: an exploratory cohort study

Abstract Background Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients with an ileo-anal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) bear an increased risk of pouch neoplasia, with prior colorectal neoplasia as the strongest predictor. It is unknown if pouch neoplasia develops independently or is derived from prior colorectal neoplasia. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the pathogenesis of pouch neoplasia by assessment of clonality between prior colorectal neoplasia and pouch neoplasia in IPAA patients with IBD. Methods In this explorative study we used the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank to identify IBD patients with both pouch neoplasia and prior colorectal neoplasia. Clonality was assessed on tissue with shallow whole genome sequencing based copy number aberration (CNA) analysis and validated with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results Three out of 13 included patients showed clonally matching CNA profiles between colorectal neoplasia and pouch neoplasia, validated with matching IHC and FISH for p16 and HER2. Patients with clonal samples corresponded with concordant histology pre- and post IPAA, positive resection margins, metastasized disease or a short interval (&amp;lt;2 years) between colorectal and pouch neoplasia diagnoses. Conclusion CNA provides a feasible method for clonality assessment in patients with colorectal neoplasia and subsequent pouch neoplasia. Most pouch neoplasia in our cohort were molecularly different from their prior colorectal neoplasia. This may indicate a multifactorial pathogenesis of pouch neoplasia.

HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing to identify HER2-positive invasive breast cancer with negative HER2 immunohistochemistry

BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast carcinomas due to HER2 amplification are associated with aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies are widely used to treat HER2-positive breast carcinomas with excellent outcomes. Accurate identification of HER2 amplification status in breast carcinomas is of important diagnostic and treatment value. Currently, HER2 amplification status is routinely determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. This study will review our past HER2 data to determine and characterize discordant results between HER2 IHC and FISH. It will also determine a potential impact of HER2 amplification status by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on these patients.MethodsWe reviewed a total of 4884 breast carcinomas with coexisting HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2010 to 2022. 57 cases also had a Next-Generation-Sequencing-based (NGS) gene panel performed. Given the advances in biostatic analysis pipelines, NGS methods were utilized to provide results on HER2 amplification status along with somatic mutations.ResultsWhile the majority (ranging from 98.5% with IHC score of 0 and 93.1% with IHC score of 1 +) of 4884 breast carcinomas had concordant results from HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH testing, a small percentage of patients (ranging from 1.5% in those with IHC score of 0, to 6.9% with IHC score of 1 +) had discordant results, with negative HER2 IHC and positive HER2 FISH results. These patients could be reported as HER2-negative breast carcinomas if only HER2 IHC testing has been performed according to a current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. 57 patients had HER2 amplification status determined by NGS, and all patients had concordant results between HER2 NGS and FISH tests. A HER2-amplified breast carcinoma by NGS had a negative IHC and a positive HER2 FISH result. This case was classified as a HER2-positive breast carcinoma, had anti-HER2-targeted therapy, and achieved a complete clinical response.ConclusionsA small percentage of HER2-positive breast carcinomas are unidentified because of a negative HER2 IHC based on our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. It is not feasible and affordable in routine clinical practice to perform HER2 FISH for the cases with negative HER2 IHC (IHC score 0 and 1 +). Therefore, NGS assays capable of simultaneously detecting both somatic mutations and HER2 amplification could provide a more comprehensive genetic profiling for breast carcinomas in a clinical setting. Identification of HER2 amplification by NGS in HER2-positive breast carcinomas with negative HER2 IHC results is important since these cases are concealed by our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy with IHC first (for all cases) and FISH reflex (only for cases with IHC score of 2 +), and would offer the opportunity for potentially beneficial anti-HER2-targeted therapies for these patients.

Indian Data on HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemically Equivocal Results As Per 2018 ASCO/CAP Guidelines.

Biren ParikhIntroduction Hormonal status and HER2 expression are valuable biomarkers and dictate the management of the patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (IBC). It is crucial to identify the patients who truly respond to anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines has recommended certain modifications in HER2 interpretation by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with concomitant immunohistochemistry (IHC). Objectives We aimed to evaluate HER2 FISH interpretation in IBC with equivocal IHC results as per 2018 ASCO/CAP recommendations and compare FISH results with hormonal receptor status. Materials and Methods FISH results of 502 cases of IBC with equivocal IHC report between January 2016 to January 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. FISH results were categorized according to ASCO/CAP guidelines 2018 into five respective groups. Results FISH testing in IHC equivocal cases showed 219 (43.6%) cases were classic amplified (positive) belonged to group 1, 217(43.2%) cases were classic nonamplified (negative) fell into group 5, 39 (7.8%) and 02 (0.4%) patients were in group 2 (negative) and group 3 (positive), and 25 (5.0%) cases were in group 4 (negative). About 52.1 and 49.3% of cases with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity were reported as HER2 positive. Among 502 cases, 25 equivocal cases according to the 2013 guidelines were redefined as HER2 negative and 02 (0.4%) cases reported positive were classified negative as per updated 2018 guidelines. Conclusion Revised 2018 guidelines is helpful in accurate identification of HER2 status and in avoiding targeted therapy in unwarranted cases. Updated 2018 guidelines has removed equivocal HER2-FISH category that has eliminated management dilemma in these cases. Only long-term clinical follow-up will establish the validity of the updated guidelines.

ERBB2 amplification status in 67 salivary duct carcinomas assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted exome sequencing

AbstractSalivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an aggressive salivary gland malignancy with poor survival. Approximately 30% SDC harbor HER2 amplification and response to trastuzumab has been reported. However, a systematic approach for HER2 status assessment in this tumor type has not been established. A total of 67 tumor samples were evaluated for HER2 protein overexpression or ERBB2 gene amplification using at least 2 methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or targeted exome next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS assessed ERBB2 copy number fold change (FC) and total copy number (TCN). HER2 status was first determined by IHC/FISH according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP breast cancer guidelines. FISH results, the “gold standard”, were compared with the NGS results. All (15/15) IHC positive, 35% (6/17) equivocal, and no (0/19) IHC negative SDC were HER2 amplified by FISH. HER2 FISH signal/cell showed a good correlation with FC (Spearman correlation: 0.708, R2: 0.501, p < 0.0001) and TCN (Spearman correlation: 0.763, R2: 0.582, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics curve estimation showed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.975 for ERBB2 FC. FC cutoff of ≥1.8 corresponded to an accuracy of 95.2% for ERBB2 amplification (Youden's index: 0.84, sensitivity: 89.47%, specificity: 100%). FC < 1.3 could be reliably classified as ERBB2 not amplified and FC ≥ 1.3 and <1.8 as equivocal. TCN estimation showed AUC of 0.981. TCN cutoff of >6.0 corresponded to an accuracy of 92% for HER2 amplification (Youden's index: 0.81, sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 100%). TCN < 4 could be reliably classified as ERBB2 not amplified and TCN ≥ 4.0 and ≤6.0 as equivocal. FC and TCN were binarized with respective cutoffs of ≥1.8 and ≥6.0 and the proportion of agreement with FISH were 95% and 92%, respectively. The assessment of ERBB2 copy number by NGS is accurate and reliable with FC or TCN nearly equivalent to FISH in identifying HER2 amplified SDC.

Concordance of breast cancer biomarker testing in core needle biopsy and surgical specimens: A single institution experience.

Accurate diagnostic biomarker testing is crucial to treatment decisions in breast cancer. Biomarker testing is performed on core needle biopsies (CNB) and is often repeated in the surgical specimen (SS) after resection. As differences between CNB and SS testing may alter treatment decisions, we evaluated concordance between CNB and SS as well as associated changes in treatment and clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients at our institution between January 2010 and May 2020. Concordance between CNB and SS was assessed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Survival in patients, including recurrence, metastatic recurrence, and death, were assessed using chi-squared likelihood ratio. In total, 961 patients met eligibility criteria. Concordance, minor discordance, total concordance (concordance plus minor discordance), and major discordance between CNB and SS were reported for ER (87.7%, 9.2%, 90.8%, and 2.9%), PR (58.1%, 29.1%, 87.2%, and 12.8%), and HER2 IHC (52.5%, 20.9%, 73.4%, 26.6%), respectively. HER2 FISH concordance and major discordance were 58.5% and 1.2%, respectively. Of major discordance, ER (48.2%, p< 0.001) and HER2 FISH (50.0%) led to more management changes than HER2 IHC (2.4%, p= 0.04) and PR (1.6%, p= 0.10). Patients with ER major discordance had increased risk of death (6.7% concordance vs. 22.2% major discordance, p= 0.004). Overall, retesting ER and HER2 was more clinically beneficial than retesting PR. To aid decision-making and minimize healthcare costs, we propose patient-centered guidelines on retesting biomarker profiles.