Hepatitis In Liver Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Acute hepatitis E as a cause of de-novo autoimmune hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Acute hepatitis E as a cause of de-novo autoimmune hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

The impact of hepatitis E in the liver transplant setting

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been identified as a cause of graft hepatitis in liver transplant recipients. The true frequency and clinical importance of HEV infections after liver transplantations is a matter of debate. It is proposed that consumption of HEV-contaminated undercooked meat is a main source for HEV infections in developed countries--which might also account for some hepatitis E cases after organ transplantation. However, HEV is also transmitted by transfusion of blood products, likely representing a previously underestimated risk particularly for patients in the transplant setting. HEV infection can take chronic courses in immunocompromised individuals, associated in some cases with rapid progression to cirrhosis within 1-2 years of infection. Diagnosis in transplanted patients is based on HEV RNA testing as antibody assays are not sensitive enough. Selection of immunosuppressive drugs is important as different compounds may influence viral replication and the course of liver disease. Ribavirin has antiviral activity against HEV and should be administered for at least three months in chronically infected individuals; however, treatment failure may occur. HEV infections have also been linked to a variety of extrahepatic manifestations both during and after resolution of infection. In this review we summarize the emerging data on hepatitis E with a particular focus on the importance of HEV infections for liver transplant recipients.

Management of viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients.

Recurrence of viral hepatitis after liver transplantation (LT) can progress to graft failure and lead to a decrease in long-term survival. Recently, there have been remarkable improvement in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) using potent antiviral agents. Combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and potent antiviral therapy has brought marked advances in the management of CHB for liver transplant recipients. Post-transplant antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection is generally reserved for patients showing progressive disease. Acheiving a sustained virological response in patients with LT greatly ameliorates graft and overall survival, however this only occurs in 30% of transplant recipient using pegylated interferon and ribavirin (RBV). Direct acting antivirals such as protease inhibitors, polymerase or other non-structural proteins inhibitors are anticipated to establish the new standard of care for transplant recipients. In liver transplant recipients, hepatitis E virus infection is an uncommon disease. However, it can lead to chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis and may require retransplantation. Recently, 3-month course of RBV monotherapy has been reported as an effective treatment. This review focuses on the recent management and therapeutic approaches of viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipient.

Hepatitis E virus infection as a cause of graft hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection induces self-limiting liver disease in immunocompetent individuals. Cases of chronic hepatitis E have recently been identified in organ transplant recipients. We questioned if chronic hepatitis E plays a role in graft hepatitis after liver transplantation in a low endemic area. Two hundred twenty-six liver transplant recipients, 129 nontransplanted patients with chronic liver disease, and 108 healthy controls were tested for HEV antibodies. HEV RNA was investigated in all sera from transplanted patients. HEV antibodies were detected in 1 healthy control (1%), 4 patients with chronic liver disease (3%), and 10 liver transplant recipients (4%). Three liver transplant patients also tested positive for HEV RNA. Two of them developed persistent viremia with HEV genotype 3. The patients were anti-HEV immunoglobulin G-negative and HEV RNA-negative before transplantation and had an episode of acute hepatitis 5 or 7 months after transplantation, which led to advanced liver fibrosis after 22 months in 1 patient. Seroconversion to anti-HEV occurred not before 4 months after the first detection of HEV RNA. The possibility of reverse zoonotic transmission was experimentally confirmed by the infection of 5 pigs with a patient's serum. The pigs showed histological inflammation in the liver, and HEV RNA was detectable in different organs, including muscle. In conclusion, the prevalence of HEV infection in Central European liver transplant recipients is low; however, chronic hepatitis E may occur and needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of graft hepatitis. The diagnosis of HEV infection should be based on HEV RNA determination in immunosuppressed patients. We suggest that immunocompromised individuals should avoid eating uncooked meat and contact with possibly HEV-infected animals.

Chronic hepatitis E in the immunosuppressed: A new source of trouble?

Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients. Haagsma EB, van den Berg AP, Porte RJ, Benne CA, Vennema H, Reimerink JH, Koopmans MP. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is known to run a self-limiting course. Sporadic cases of acute hepatitis due to infection with HEV genotype 3, present in pig populations, are increasingly recognized. Zoonotic transmission seems infrequent. The entity of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation has been recognized. Detection of HEV in 2 liver transplant recipients triggered a review of these cases. Freeze-stored sera were available for retrospective analysis. HEV antibodies were determined. For virus detection and identification, a fragment of the gene encoding the major capsid protein (open reading frame 2) was amplified by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequenced to identify the genotype. Two months after liver transplantation, case A developed unexplained chronic hepatitis, which developed into cirrhosis. Retransplantation followed 7 years later, after which chronic hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, HEV RNA was present in serum 3 weeks after the first transplantation and remained present afterwards. HEV RNA was also present in retransplant liver tissue. HEV antibodies appeared late after retransplantation. Case B developed unexplained chronic hepatitis 7 years after transplantation. Retransplantation was needed 5 years later, after which no signs of hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, the period of chronic hepatitis up to the retransplantation coincided with HEV RNA in serum. In case B, antibodies developed, the viral load was much lower than in case A, and the virus seemed to be cleared after retransplantation. Genotyping in both cases revealed 2 unique strains of genotype 3. In conclusion, chronic HEV infection may develop in immunosuppressed patients, who may then serve as long-term carriers of the virus. We hypothesize that HEV may be the cause of chronic hepatitis in liver transplant recipients. (c) 2008 AASLD. [Abstract reproduced by permission of Liver Transpl 2008;14:547–553]. Hepatitis E virus and chronic hepatitis in organ-transplant recipients. Kamar N, Selves J, Mansuy JM, Ouezzani L, Peron JM, Guitard J, Cointault O, Esposito L, Abravanel F, Danjoux M, Durand D, Vinel JP, Izopet J, Rostaing L. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is considered an agent responsible for acute hepatitis that does not progress to chronic hepatitis. We identified 14 cases of acute HEV infection in three patients receiving liver transplants, nine receiving kidney transplants, and two receiving kidney and pancreas transplants. All patients were positive for serum HEV RNA. Chronic hepatitis developed in eight patients, as confirmed by persistently elevated aminotransferase levels, serum HEV RNA, and histologic features of chronic hepatitis. The time from transplantation to diagnosis was significantly shorter and the total counts of lymphocytes and of CD2, CD3, and CD4 T cells were significantly lower in patients in whom chronic disease developed. [Abstract reproduced by permission of N Engl J Med 2008;358:811–817].

Chronic hepatitis E virus infection in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is known to run a self-limiting course. Sporadic cases of acute hepatitis due to infection with HEV genotype 3, present in pig populations, are increasingly recognized. Zoonotic transmission seems infrequent. The entity of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation has been recognized. Detection of HEV in 2 liver transplant recipients triggered a review of these cases. Freeze-stored sera were available for retrospective analysis. HEV antibodies were determined. For virus detection and identification, a fragment of the gene encoding the major capsid protein (open reading frame 2) was amplified by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and sequenced to identify the genotype. Two months after liver transplantation, case A developed unexplained chronic hepatitis, which developed into cirrhosis. Retransplantation followed 7 years later, after which chronic hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, HEV RNA was present in serum 3 weeks after the first transplantation and remained present afterwards. HEV RNA was also present in retransplant liver tissue. HEV antibodies appeared late after retransplantation. Case B developed unexplained chronic hepatitis 7 years after transplantation. Retransplantation was needed 5 years later, after which no signs of hepatitis recurred. In retrospect, the period of chronic hepatitis up to the retransplantation coincided with HEV RNA in serum. In case B, antibodies developed, the viral load was much lower than in case A, and the virus seemed to be cleared after retransplantation. Genotyping in both cases revealed 2 unique strains of genotype 3. In conclusion, chronic HEV infection may develop in immunosuppressed patients, who may then serve as long-term carriers of the virus. We hypothesize that HEV may be the cause of chronic hepatitis in liver transplant recipients.

Rejection and Steroid Dependence: Unique Risk Factors in the Development of Pediatric Posttransplant De Novo Autoimmune Hepatitis

Posttransplant de novo autoimmune hepatitis (d-AIH) is increasingly described as a long-term complication after pediatric liver transplantation (LT). d-AIH is characterized by graft dysfunction, the development of autoimmune antibodies and histologic evidence of hepatitis in liver transplant recipients without previous history of autoimmune liver disease. This study is a matched case-control, univariate analysis aimed at identifying risk factors for the development of d-AIH and evaluating response to treatment. From 1984 to 2003, 619 children received 788 LTs at a single center. Forty-one patients developed d-AIH and were matched with controls for year of LT, age at time of LT and diagnosis. The following variables were insignificant in the development of d-AIH: age, gender, race, initial diagnosis, ischemia time, graft type, Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus status, HLA typing and primary immunosuppression. Compared to controls, d-AIH patients were less likely to be on monotherapy immunosuppression or weaned off prednisone at the time of diagnosis. The d-AIH group relative to the controls had statistically significant greater numbers of rejection episodes. d-AIH was treated with prednisone and/or MMF in 39 of 41 patients and lead to significant improvements in liver function tests. Thirty-nine patients are alive at a mean of 4.0 years follow-up after diagnosis. Three have required retransplantation.

Low-dose steroid induction with tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil is associated with increased risk of HCV allograft hepatitis in liver transplant recipients with HCV infection: Diane R Abraczinskas, Manuel Pascual, Ana N Contreras, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Sandy Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Dicken Ko, Seema Baid, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Rie Ookubo, Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA;

Low-dose steroid induction with tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil is associated with increased risk of HCV allograft hepatitis in liver transplant recipients with HCV infection: Diane R Abraczinskas, Manuel Pascual, Ana N Contreras, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Sandy Feng, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Dicken Ko, Seema Baid, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Rie Ookubo, Faulkner Hospital, Boston, MA;

Impact of human herpesvirus-6 on the frequency and severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients.

A role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) In the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been proposed. The novel herpes virus, human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), is amongst the most potent inducers of cytokines, including TNF-alpha. The impact of HHV-6 viremia on the progression of recurrent HCV hepatitis was assessed in 51 HCV-positive liver transplant recipients. The frequency of recurrent HCV hepatitis did not differ between patients with HCV viremia (47.6%, 10/21) as compared with those without HCV viremia (46.7%, 14/30, p = 0.9). However, the patients with HHV-6 viremia had a significantly higher fibrosis score upon HCV recurrence than those without HHV-6 viremia (mean 1.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.01). An association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and HCV recurrence was not documented; 50% (15/30) of the patients with CMV viremia and 42.8% (9/21) of those without CMV viremia had recurrent HCV hepatitis (p > 0.5). Receipt of ganciclovir (administered upon the detection of CMV viremia) was associated with lower total Knodell score (mean 5.2 vs. 6.9, p = 0.05) and a trend towards lower fibrosis score (mean 0.44 vs. 1.00, p = 0.12) in patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis. Thus, HHV-6 viremia in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients identified a subgroup of patients at increased risk for early fibrosis upon HCV recurrence.

Quality of life, functional status, and depression in male liver transplant recipients with recurrent viral hepatitis C.

The quality of life, psychologic sequelae, and functional status of liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis have not been well defined. Perceived quality of life, psychologic distress, depression, adaptive coping, and functional status were prospectively assessed in 59 liver transplant recipients at baseline (before transplantation) and 6 and 12 months after transplantation; comparisons were made between patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis and all other patients. Recurrent HCV hepatitis developed in 41% (14/34) of the patients with HCV. At 6 months, the patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis had significantly lower functional status (P=0.013) and experienced less gain in physical functioning from baseline than other patients (P=0.02). Quality of life, depression, and psychologic distress were not different at 6 months for patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis compared with all other patients. At 12 months, the patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis had significantly lower quality of life (P=0.003), greater depression (P=0.045), higher psychologic distress (P=0.05), and lower physical functioning (P=0.008) than all other patients. Recurrent HCV hepatitis in liver transplant recipients is associated with impairment in quality of life, functional status, and greater depression compared with patients who did not have HCV and those without HCV recurrence.

Recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: Association with rejection and increased immunosuppression after transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C virus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. However, the risk factors for clinical recurrence including the role of rejection and immunosuppression have not been defined in patients receiving tacrolimus (FK506) as primary immunosuppression. Sixty-six consecutive adult liver transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression were monitored; 31 of 66 underwent transplantation for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus. Median follow-up for the patients in the study was 3 1/2 years. Recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis determined on histopathologic evaluation developed in 58% (18 of 31). A number of clinical variables including rejection and intensity of immunosuppression were assessed for patients with and without recurrence. Rejection episodes preceding recurrence were documented in 72% (13 of 18) of patients with recurrence compared with 23% (3 of 13) in those without recurrence (p=0.007). A total of 33% (5 of 15) of patients with no rejection experienced recurrence versus 83% (5 of 6) with one episode of rejection (p=0.06) and 80% (8 of 10) with more than one episode of rejection (p=0.04). The mean number of steroid boluses for the treatment of rejection was higher for patients with recurrence (2.3 versus 0.77, p=0.01). Overall immunosuppression (as measured by steroids boluses, recycles, OKT3, and azathioprine) was significantly more intense for patients with recurrence (p=0.013). Greater rejection concurrent with increased immunosuppression was associated with a higher recurrence of hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients.

Viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

The influence of HLA donor-recipient compatibility on the recurrence of HBV and HCV hepatitis after liver transplantation.

The influence of HLA donor-recipient compatibility on the recurrence of HBV and HCV hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Soluble T lymphocyte markers in the diagnosis of cellular rejection and cytomegalovirus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Hepatic dysfunction following liver transplantation is often caused by cellular rejection or infection with cytomegalovirus. These etiologies can at times be difficult to differentiate. We measured the levels of soluble T lymphocyte markers sIL2R, sCD4, and sCD8 in serum as possible diagnostic indicators of cellular rejection and cytomegalovirus hepatitis. Pretransplant levels, and serial post-transplant levels of soluble T lymphocyte markers were measured in five control patients without cellular rejection or cytomegalovirus infection, ten patients with cellular rejection, and six patients with cytomegalovirus hepatitis. In all cases, cellular rejection and cytomegalovirus hepatitis were documented with liver histology. For each group of patients, we calculated the mean ratio of the post-transplant marker level divided by the pre-transplant level. We found an elevation in the mean ratio of sIL2R in patients with cellular rejection shortly before or at the time of diagnosis of rejection as compared to the transplant control group. Levels of sCD8 were not significantly increased in patients with cellular rejection. We found a more pronounced elevation in the mean marker ratios of both sIL2R and sCD8 in patients with cytomegalovirus hepatitis which were higher compared not only to the transplant control group but also compared to the cellular rejection group. The rise of serum levels preceded the histologic diagnosis of cytomegalovirus hepatitis and detection of cytomegalovirus in blood cultures. Increased serum levels of sIL2R with concomitant elevation of sCD8 suggest the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus hepatitis over cellular rejection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Interferon alfa treatment for recurrent viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Interferon alfa treatment for recurrent viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

HCV-RNA positive hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

HCV-RNA positive hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

Frequency and severity of HCV infection following orthotopic liver transplantation: Effect of donor and recipient serology for HCV using a second generation ELISA test

HCV is the principal etiologic agent of post-transfusion (PTH) hepatitis. The incidence and course of HCV hepatitis in liver transplant recipients is not well established. To resolve this information deficit, all records of recipients of single liver transplant (OLTx) between March 1986 and March 1990 at the University of Pittsburgh in whom both the donor and recipients' pre-OLTx sera were available (n = 516) were reviewed. All sera were assayed for HCV antibody using a second generation ELISA method developed by Abbott Laboratories. On the basis of the anti-HCV status of the donor and recipient pre-OLTx sera, four groups could be classified: group I (donor-, recipient-) n = 375; group II (donor-, recipient+) n = 111; group III (donor+, recipient-) n = 25; and group IV (donor+, recipient+) n = 5. Post OLTx liver biopsies were obtained for a clinical indication in 473 of these 516 patients. The prevalence of anti-HCV among recipients pre-OLTx was 22.5% (116/516) which is three times greater than the 5.8% (30/516) prevalence in the donors. Histologic hepatitis not ascribable to any cause other than HCV occurred in 76/516 (15%) recipients: 42 in group I; 28 in group II; 6 in group III and none in group IV. The overall risk of HCV hepatitis at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-OLTx was 4.8% (25/516), 7.6% (39/516) and 10.1% (52/516), respectively. At each of these time intervals, no significant difference between groups for the prevalence of HCV hepatitis was evident.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Incidence, prevalence, and clinical course of hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the agent responsible for posttransfusion hepatitis. The incidence, timing, and clinical course of HCV positive hepatitis in liver transplant recipients are unknown. Three hundred and seventeen donor-recipient liver transplant pairs were grouped on the basis of their pretransplant HCV antibody status. The biopsy findings were examined. Four distinct groups were identified on the basis of HCV serology: group I, both were negative; group II, donor was negative and recipient was positive; group III, donor was positive and recipient was negative; group IV, both were positive. The prevalence of anti-HCV positivity in recipients was 13.6%. The rate of seroconversion was 9.2%. Histologic hepatitis not ascribable to any specific cause other than non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis occurred in 13.8%. The incidence of histologic chronic active hepatitis was 1.6%, and none progressed to cirrhosis. The concordance rate for a positive anti-HCV serology and NANB hepatitis was 2.8%. Of the 35 patients (group II and IV) with positive anti-HCV serology pretransplant, only 17 were positive posttransplantation. Based on these data it can be concluded that posttransplant NANB hepatitis occurred in 13.8% of liver recipients. Twenty percent of these were anti-HCV positive. Progression to histologic chronic active hepatitis occurs over a period of 1–5 years in 1.6% of cases.

Acute adenovirus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

An acute or fulminant adenovirus hepatitis developed in 5 of 224 pediatric patients who were recipients of orthotopic liver transplants. All had received prednisolone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine as basal immunosuppression, and four received monoclonal (OKT3) or polyclonal (antithymocyte globulin) antibodies for steroid-resistant rejection episodes. These patients initially had high fever and a worsening condition for a mean of 73 days after transplantation (range 44 to 140 days). Results of biochemical tests showed very high serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase. Aspartate aminotransferase values were always markedly more elevated than those of alanine aminotransferase. Two patients had severe leukopenia. Results of histologic studies of the liver showed extensive areas of confluent necrosis and targetlike hepatocyte nuclei. Typical intranuclear viral inclusions were observed on electron microscopy. Adenovirus was cultured in all patients and in two relatives. Two patients died of liver failure; others recovered after cessation of immunosuppression. We conclude that adenovirus hepatitis can be fatal in liver transplant recipients. There is no specific treatment, and immunosuppression must be discontinued.

Early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients: Role of immunostaining, dna hybridization and culture of hepatic tissue

Immunostaining techniques that use a monoclonal antibody against an early cytomegalovirus antigen or a polyclonal antibody, in situ DNA hybridization and inoculation of cell cultures for the detection of cytomegalovirus from liver biopsy specimens were studied in 20 liver transplant patients with cytomegalovirus hepatitis, as defined by histological criteria. A total of 108 liver biopsy specimens from 20 patients with a diagnosis of cytomegalovirus hepatitis (obtained per protocol at 7, 21, 90, and 180 days or whenever liver dysfunction occurred), which had previously been examined histologically and in cell culture, were again studied by recutting the liver tissue for histological examination, DNA hybridization and immunostaining with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies to cytomegalovirus. In 5 of 20 patients, the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus hepatitis could have been made earlier (mean = 9.6 days) by immunostaining with a monoclonal antibody. Of 47 biopsy specimens with cytomegalovirus inclusion bodies, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic procedures were immunostaining with monoclonal antibody (84% and 90%) and polyclonal antibody (72% and 97%), in situ DNA hybridization (72% and 100%) and cell culture detection (52% and 95%), respectively. Immunostaining with a monoclonal antibody against an early CMV antigen frequently detected cytomegalovirus infection in the liver allograft earlier than identification of typical histological inclusion bodies. DNA in situ hybridization was less sensitive than other techniques but highly specific; cytomegalovirus cell culture lacked sensitivity compared with the other procedures.