Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen Assay Research Articles

Infectivity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) positive plasma with undetectable HBV-DNA: Can HBsAg screening be discontinued in Egyptian blood donors?

HBV infectivity data were reviewed and the 50% infectious dose (ID50 ) was reassessed in different HBsAg positive infection stages enabling modelling of transfusion-transmitted (TT)-HBV infection risk if HBsAg donor screening was replaced by individual donation nucleic acid amplification technology (ID-NAT). Quantitative HBsAg and HBV-DNA assays were performed against international standards to compare the ratio between potential infectious HBV virions and subviral HBsAg particles in Egyptian HBsAg positive blood donors as well as in Japanese chimpanzee samples of known infectivity. HBV-DNA load below the quantification limit of detection was estimated against a reference standard by replicate NAT testing (n=25). Infectivity of chimpanzee samples collected during ramp-up and declining viremic phase were tested in a human liver chimeric mice (HLCM) model and compared with published infectivity data from different HBsAg positive infection stages. Lowest estimates of ID50 in HBsAg positive plasma were 3-6 HBV virions in chimpanzee studies. Infectivity decreased approximately 10-100-fold in the declining viremic phase using HLCM. In acute-phase samples, HBV to HBsAg particle ratios varied between 1:102 -104 but in HBsAg positive blood donors this particle ratio reached 1:106 -1012 when viral load was below 100 HBV-DNA copies/ml. Modelled TT-HBV risk of an HBsAg positive/ID-NAT nonreactive blood transfusion was estimated at 9%-46% for components containing 20-200ml of plasma assuming an ID50 of 316 (point estimate between 100 and 1000) virions. In the Egyptian setting, discontinuation of HBsAg donor screening and reliance on ID-NAT alone seems to be unsafe.

Molecular and Serological Characterization of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-Positive Samples with Very Low or Undetectable Levels of HBV Surface Antigen.

Background: Gaps remain in the detection of nucleic acid test (NAT) yield and occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) by current HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) assays. The lack of detection may be due to HBsAg levels below current assay detection limits, mutations affecting HBsAg assays or HBsAg levels, or the masking of HBsAg by antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs). In this study, we evaluate the incremental detection of NAT yield and OBI from five diverse geographic areas by an improved sensitivity HBsAg assay and characterize the samples relative to the viral load, anti-HBs status, and PreS1–S2–S mutations. Included is a comparison population with HBV DNA levels comparable to OBI, but with readily detectable HBsAg (High Surface–Low DNA, HSLD). Methods: A total of 347 samples collected from the USA, South Africa, Spain, Cameroon, Vietnam, and Cote D’Ivoire representing NAT yield (HBsAg(−), antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc)(−), HBV DNA(+), N = 131), OBI (HBsAg(−), anti-HBc(+), HBV DNA(+), N = 188), and HSLD (HBsAg(+), anti-HBc(+), HBV DNA(+), N = 28) were tested with ARCHITECT HBsAg NEXT (HBsAgNx) (sensitivity 0.005 IU/mL). The sequencing of the PreS1–S2–S genes from a subset of 177 samples was performed to determine the genotype and assess amino acid variability, particularly in anti-HBs(+) samples. Results: HBsAgNx detected 44/131 (33.6%) NAT yield and 42/188 (22.3%) OBI samples. Mean HBV DNA levels for NAT yield and OBI samples were lower in HBsAgNx(−) (50.3 and 25.9 IU/mL) than in HBsAgNx(+) samples (384.1 and 139.5 IU/mL). Anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL was present in 28.6% HBsAgNx(+) and 45.2% HBsAgNx(−) OBI, and in 3.6% HSLD samples. The genotypes were A1, A2, B, C, D, E, F, and H. There was no significant difference between HBsAgNx(−) and HBsAgNx(+) in the proportion of samples harboring substitutions or in the mean number of substitutions per sample in PreS1, PreS2, or S for the NAT yield or OBI (p range: 0.1231 to >0.9999). A total of 21/27 (77.8%) of HBsAgNx(+) OBI carried S escape mutations, insertions, or stop codons. HSLD had more PreS1 and fewer S substitutions compared to both HBsAgNx(−) and HBsAgNx(+) OBI. Mutations/deletions associated with impaired HBsAg secretion were observed in the OBI group. Conclusions: HBsAgNx provides the improved detection of NAT yield and OBI samples. Samples that remain undetected by HBsAgNx have exceptionally low HBsAg levels below the assay detection limit, likely due to low viremia or the suppression of HBsAg expression by host and viral factors.

An ultra-sensitive Abbott ARCHITECT® assay for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)

BackgroundCritical to the identification of HBV infection and the prevention of transfusion transmitted disease is the sensitive and accurate detection of Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg). Improvements in HBsAg assay sensitivity approaching the performance of nucleic acid testing (NAT) are essential to further reduce the detection window for acute HBV infection in regions where NAT is not widely available. Objectives and study designAn improved HBsAg assay on the fully-automated Abbott ARCHITECT® platform was developed to improve sensitivity, mutant and genotype detection. ResultsThe analytical sensitivity of the improved prototype assay is 5.2 mIU/ml, which is 3.86- to 14.54-fold more sensitive than comparator assays based on the WHO International Reference Standard. The enhanced sensitivity was also demonstrated with 27 HBV seroconversion panels, detecting more panel members (191 of 364) vs. the ARCHITECT® Qual I (144), Qual II (160) and PRISM® (148) HBsAg assays. Further, the assay detected 7 of 12 HBV DNA positive/HBsAg negative samples, and detected all evaluated mutants and genotypes with higher sensitivity than the comparator assays. The improvement in sensitivity did not diminish assay specificity, attaining 100% (95% CI, 99.97-100%) on 10,633 blood donors. ConclusionsAn Abbott ARCHITECT® HBsAg assay with clinical performance approaching that of mini-pool NAT (approximately 100 copies/ml was developed. The assay has superior HBsAg mutant and genotype detection and specificity, all of which are important for the diagnosis and management of HBV infection.

Evaluation of a novel chemiluminescent microplate enzyme immunoassay for hepatitis B surface antigen detection

Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) is an important biomarker used in the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but false-negative results are still reported in the detection of HBsAg using commercial assays. In this study, we evaluated the qualitative properties of a novel HBsAg chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) assay – WTultra. WHO standard sample dilution series and samples from low-level HBsAg carriers (<1ng/mL) were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the WTultra assay. Boston Biomedica, Inc. (BBI) hepatitis B seroconversion panels were used to assess the ability of the WTultra assay to detect the window period. In addition, dilution series of 22 serum samples with different genotypes, serotypes and HBsAg mutations were used to assess the WTultra assay, and these were compared with other commercial assays. The lower detection limit of the WTultra assay was 0.012IU/mL, and it showed a high sensitivity (97.52%, 95% CI, 94.95–99.00) in the detection of 282 low-level HBsAg carriers (<1ng/mL). In samples with various HBV genotypes, serotypes and HBsAg mutations, the WTultra assay yielded 117 positive results in 132 samples, which was significantly higher than the results with the other four commercial assays (89, 83, 65 and 45, respectively, p<0.01). In the assays of mutant strains, the WTultra assay detected 82 positive results in 90 samples, which was significantly better than the results for the Hepanostika HBsAg Ultra (58 positive) and Architect (55 positive) (p<0.01) assays, which in turn were significantly better than the Murex V.3 (41 positive, p=0.026) and AxSYM V2 (29 positive, p<0.01) assays. However, in the detection of 42 samples of wild-type strains with various genotypes and serotypes, no significant differences were observed among the WTultra (35 positive), Architect (28 positive) and Hepanostika HBsAg Ultra (31 positive) assays. However, the WTultra assay detected significantly more samples than the Murex V.3 (24 positive, p<0.01) and AxSYM V2 (16 positive, p<0.01) assays. In conclusion, the WTultra HBsAg assay has a high detection sensitivity and presents excellent results for the detection of mutants.

Reactivation of a hepatitis B virus surface-antigen mutant following an autologous stem-cell transplant for multiple myeloma in an anti-HBc-negative patient

Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface-antigen mutants can present diagnostic difficulties when they are not recognized by commercial assays; HBV infection with undetectable core antibody is also described. Case presentation: We report the case of a multiple myeloma patient who had no detectable serum HBV core antibody, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA prior to immunosuppressive treatment, who, after autologous stem-cell transplant, developed a reactivation of occult HBV with a HBsAg mutant, undetectable with a commercial HBsAg assay. Conclusion: This case reminds clinicians to be mindful of the potential diagnostic difficulties of HBV serology in the immunosuppressed, and to remain vigilant for the possibility of the reactivation of HBV and the existence of HBsAg mutants, which can also reactivate, in the context of profound immunosuppression.

Clinical performance of the novel DiaSorin LIAISON® XL murex: HBsAg Quant, HCV-Ab, HIV-Ab/Ag assays

BackgroundThe fully automated and closed LIAISON®XL platform was developed for reliable detection of infection markers like hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies (Ab) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-Ag/Ab. To date, less is known about the diagnostic performance of this system in direct comparison to the common Abbott ARCHITECT® platform. ObjectivesWe compared the diagnostic performance and usability of the DiaSorin LIAISON®XL with the commonly used Abbott ARCHITECT® system. Study designThe qualitative performance of the above mentioned assays was compared in about 500 sera. Quantitative tests were performed for HBsAg-positive samples from patients under therapy (n=289) and in vitro expressed mutants (n=37). For HCV-Ab, a total number of 155 selected samples from patients chronically infected with different HCV genotypes were tested. ResultsThe concordance between both systems was 99.4% for HBsAg, 98.81% for HCV-Ab, and 99.6% for HIV-Ab/Ag. The quantitative LIAISON®XL murex HBsAg assay detected all mutants in comparable amounts to the HBsAg wild type and yielded highly reliable HBsAg kinetics in patients treated with antiviral drugs. Dilution experiments using the 2nd International Standard for HBsAg (WHO) showed a high accuracy of this test. HCV-Ab from patients infected with genotypes 1–3 were equally detected in both systems. Interestingly, S/CO levels of HCV-Ab from patients infected with genotype 3 seem to be relatively low using both systems. ConclusionsThe LIAISON®XL platform proved to be an excellent system for diagnostics of HBV, HCV, and HIV with equal performance compared to the ARCHITECT® system.

Infectivity of occult hepatitis B from two different points of view

Infectivity of occult hepatitis <scp>B</scp> from two different points of view

Comparison of Serum HBsAg Quantitation by Four Immunoassays, and Relationships of HBsAg Level with HBV Replication and HBV Genotypes

BackgroundThe decline in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) may be an early predictor of the viral efficacy of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapy. The HBsAg levels obtained by different immunoassays now need comparing and the relationships between levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA alongside HBsAg and genotype must be evaluated.Methodology/Principal FindingsHBsAg levels were compared among 80 patients using the Abbott Architect assay, a commercial immunoassay approved for HBsAg detection and quantitation, and three other assays derived from immunoassays approved for HBsAg detection (manufactured by Diasorin, Bio-Rad and Roche). Good correlation was found between the Abbot vs. Diasorin, Bio-Rad and Roche assays with narrow 95% limits of agreement and small mean differences: −0.06 to 0.11, −0.09 log10 IU/mL; −0.57 to 0.64, −0.04 log10 IU/mL; −0.09 to 0.45, −0.27 log10 IU/mL, respectively. These agreements were not affected by genotypes A or D. HBsAg was weakly correlated with HBV DNA, whatever the HBsAg assay used: Abbott, ρ = 0.36 p = 0.001, Diasorin ρ = 0.34, p = 0.002; Bio-Rad ρ = 0.37, p<0.001; or Roche ρ = 0.41, p<0.001. This relationship between levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA seemed to depend on genotypes. Whereas HBsAg (Abbott assay) tended to correlate with HBV DNA for genotype A (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.02), no such correlation was significant for genotypes D (ρ = 0.29, p = 0.15).Conclusion/SignificanceThe quantitation of HBsAg in routine clinical samples is comparable between the reference assay and the adapted assays with acceptable accuracy limits, low levels of variability and minimum discrepancy. While HBsAg quantitation is not affected by HBV genotype, the observed association between levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA seems genotype dependent.

An improved Abbott ARCHITECT ® assay for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg)

Background The sensitive and accurate detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) is critical to the identification of infection and the prevention of transfusion transmitted disease. Improvement in HBsAg assay sensitivity is essential to reduce the window to detect an acute HBV infection. Additionally, the sensitive detection of HBsAg mutants that continue to evolve due to vaccine escape, immune selection and an error prone reverse transcriptase is a necessity. Objectives and study design A fully automated HBsAg prototype assay on the Abbott ARCHITECT ® instrument was developed to improve sensitivity and mutant detection. This magnetic microparticle-based assay utilizes anti-HBsAg monoclonal antibodies to capture antigen present in serum or plasma. Captured antigen is then detected using anti-HBsAg antibody conjugated with the chemiluminescent compound, acridinium. Results The sensitivity of the ARCHITECT ® HBsAg prototype assay was improved as compared to the current ARCHITECT ®, PRISM ®, and competitor HBsAg assays. The enhancement in assay sensitivity was demonstrated by the use of commercially available HBV seroconversion panels. The prototype assay detected more panel members (185 of 383) vs. the current ARCHITECT ® (171), PRISM (181), or competitor HBsAg assays (73/140 vs. 62/140, respectively). The ARCHITECT ® prototype assay also efficiently detected all mutants evaluated. Finally, the sensitivity improvement did not compromise the specificity of the assay (99.94%). Conclusions An improved Abbott ARCHITECT ® HBsAg prototype assay with enhanced detection of HBsAg and HBsAg mutants, as well as equivalent specificity was developed for the detection, diagnosis, and management of HBV infection.

Prediction of conformational changes by single mutation in the hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) identified in HBsAg-negative blood donors

BackgroundSelection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) by host immunity has been suggested to give rise to variants with amino acid substitutions at or around the 'a' determinant of the surface antigen (HBsAg), the main target of antibody neutralization and diagnostic assays. However, there have never been successful attempts to provide evidence for this hypothesis, partly because the 3 D structure of HBsAg molecules has not been determined. Tertiary structure prediction of HBsAg solely from its primary amino acid sequence may reveal the molecular energetic of the mutated proteins. We carried out this preliminary study to analyze the predicted HBsAg conformation changes of HBV variants isolated from Indonesian blood donors undetectable by HBsAg assays and its significance, compared to other previously-reported variants that were associated with diagnostic failure.ResultsThree HBV variants (T123A, M133L and T143M) and a wild type sequence were analyzed together with frequently emerged variants T123N, M133I, M133T, M133V, and T143L. Based on the Jameson-Wolf algorithm for calculating antigenic index, the first two amino acid substitutions resulted in slight changes in the antigenicity of the 'a' determinant, while all four of the comparative variants showed relatively more significant changes. In the pattern T143M, changes in antigenic index were more significant, both in its coverage and magnitude, even when compared to variant T143L. These data were also partially supported by the tertiary structure prediction, in which the pattern T143M showed larger shift in the HBsAg second loop structure compared to the others.ConclusionsSingle amino acid substitutions within or near the 'a' determinant of HBsAg may alter antigenicity properties of variant HBsAg, which can be shown by both its antigenic index and predicted 3 D conformation. Findings in this study emphasize the significance of variant T143M, the prevalent isolate with highest degree of antigenicity changes found in Indonesian blood donors. This highlights the importance of evaluating the effects of protein structure alterations on the sensitivity of screening methods being used in detection of ongoing HBV infection, as well as the use of vaccines and immunoglobulin therapy in contributing to the selection of HBV variants.

Performance evaluation of 70 hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) assays from around the world by a geographically diverse panel with an array of HBV genotypes and HBsAg subtypes

Background and ObjectivesThis study was conducted by the International Consortium for Blood Safety (ICBS) to identify high-quality test kits for detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) for the benefit of developing countries.Materials and MethodsThe 70 HBsAg test kits from around the world were evaluated comparatively for their clinical sensitivity, analytical sensitivity, sensitivity to HBV genotypes and HBsAg subtypes, and specificity using 394 (146 clinical, 48 analytical and 200 negative) ICBS Master Panel members of diverse geographical origin comprising the major HBV genotypes A-F and the HBsAg subtypes adw2,4, adr and ayw1-4.ResultsSeventeen HBsAg enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits had high analytical sensitivity <0·13 IU/ml, showed 100% diagnostic sensitivity, and were even sensitive for the various HBV variants tested. An additional six test kits had high sensitivity (<0·13 IU/ml) but missed HBsAg mutants and/or showed reduced sensitivity to certain HBV genotypes. Twenty HBsAg EIA kits were in the sensitivity range of 0·13–1 IU/ml. The other eight EIAs and the 19 rapid assays had analytical sensitivities of 1 to >4 IU/ml. These assays were falsely negative for 1–4 clinical samples and 17 of these test kits showed genotype dependent sensitivity reduction. Analytical sensitivities for HBsAg of >1 IU/ml significantly reduce the length of the HBsAg positive period which renders them less reliable for detecting HBsAg in asymptomatic HBV infections. Reduced sensitivity for HBsAg with genetic diversity of HBV occurred with genotypes/subtypes D/ayw3, E/ayw4, F/adw4 and by S gene mutants. Specificity of the HBsAg assays was ≥99·5% in 57 test kits and 96·4–99·0% in the remaining test kits.ConclusionDiagnostic efficacy of the evaluated HBsAg test kits differed substantially. Laboratories should therefore be aware of the analytical sensitivity for HBsAg and check for the relevant HBV variants circulating in the relevant population.

Genetic variability of the S gene of hepatitis B virus: clinical and diagnostic impact / Genetische Variabilität des Hepatitis B Virus S Gens: Einfluss auf Klinik und Diagnostik

The genetic variability of hepatitis B virus (HBV) represents a challenge for the sensitivity of immunologic and molecular based assays. Based on sequence divergence in the entire genome of >8%, HBV genomes have been classified into nine groups designated A to I. The genotypes of HBV have distinct geographic distributions. Although preliminary clinical studies seem to indicate that there is an association between HBV genotype and the natural history of infection and response to antiviral therapy, further evaluations employing larger cohorts of patients are necessary to provide conclusive evidence. The analytical sensitivity of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies to the HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs) assays may be dependent on HBV genotype or subtype. The influence of genotypic variability on the sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) has so far been poorly investigated. Preliminary results show that new real-time NATs detect genotypes A to G with equal sensitivity. Different mechanisms intervening at the translational or post-translational level, including conformational changes, hydrophobic changes, insertion of basic residues, and reduced synthesis or secretion of HBsAg may account solely or in combination for escape mutations to the immune response and to detection in HBsAg immunoassays. The clinical significance of S gene mutants needs, similarly to that of HBV genotypes, to be investigated further. HBV mutants are stable over time and can be transmitted horizontally or vertically. The sensitivity of HBsAg assays for mutant detection is being continuously improved. Immunoassays based on polyclonal capture antibodies demonstrate the highest sensitivity for the recognition of recombinant mutants or serum samples harboring mutant forms of HBsAg. However, they do not guarantee full sensitivity. Detection of HBsAg needs to be improved by the introduction of new HBsAg assays able to recognize described S gene mutants and with a lower detection threshold than current immunoassays in order to detect smallest amounts of HBsAg in low level carriers. There is also a need for more complete epidemiological data on the prevalence of HBsAg mutants in Western Europe and assays for the (differential) screening of mutants need to be developed and evaluated.

Improved detection of natural hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) mutants by a new version of the VITROS® HBsAg assay

The sensitivity of immunoassays for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) detection may be hampered by the presence of mutants involving the major antigenic determinant of the protein. The performance of the VITROS HBsAg Assay has been shown to be affected by mutations comprising amino acid changes at residues 143, 144, and 145 of the HBsAg molecule. Sixty-seven serum samples from HBV carriers containing major populations of natural HBsAg mutants assayed previously by that assay were tested by the new VITROS HBsAg ES Assay. Samples displayed either single or multiple amino acid substitutions between positions 112 and 145 of the HBsAg, including changes in relevant residues such as 118-120, 125-127, and 143-145. Testing of undiluted samples by the current assay gave rise to false negative results in two samples displaying the single substitutions 145A and 145R, and in one additional sample displaying a dual mutation 118A + 145A. Unusually weak reactivity (<25 S/CO units) was, in addition, recorded in samples containing mutants 143L (2 samples) and 115N + 120Q + 131K + 144A (1 sample). Testing samples at the 1/40 dilution by the modified assay did not produce, in contrast, false negative results, and reactivity below 25 S/CO units was recorded only in three cases. These results confirm that the capability of immunoassays to detect the presence of natural HBsAg mutants in clinical samples may be improved significantly by introducing changes in their design, and show that such improvement has been achieved successfully with the new VITROS HBsAg ES Assay.

Sensitivities of Four New Commercial Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Assays in Detection of HBsAg Mutant Forms

Mutations in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) involving amino acid substitution within the immunodominant "a" determinant may affect the performance of commercial HBsAg assays. The performances of four HBsAg assays that recently received Conformité Européene marking, Advia Centaur HBsAg (Bayer), Monolisa HBsAg Ultra (Bio-Rad), Liaison HBsAg (Dia Sorin), and Vidas HBsAg Ultra (bioMérieux), were compared with that of the routinely used HBsAg assay AxSYM HBsAg V2 (Abbott). Assays were evaluated for (i) analytical sensitivity performance with a national reference HBsAg panel (including 10 samples with calibrated HBsAg concentrations from 0.04 to 2.24 ng/ml) and (ii) the detection of HBsAg mutants by studying a panel of 35 HBsAg mutants (23 collected from patients and 12 recombinant mutants). The limits of detection of these assays were <0.15 ng/ml (from 0.089 to 0.121 ng/ml). The sensitivity performances for mutant virus detection varied, ranging from 37.1% to 91.4%. The lack of detection of these mutants by commercial assays was probably due to the epitope recognition of the anti-HBs assay reagents in the capture phase and in the conjugates. The prevalence and clinical impact of HBsAg mutants are under investigation. However, the manufacturers must be vigilant in the design of the assays in order to reduce the risk of missing a broad range of described S gene mutants.

The Analytic Sensitivity and Mutant Detection Capability of Six Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Assays

Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) mutants occur in clinical specimens. We studied the analytic sensitivity and ability to detect recombinant and native mutants of 6 HBsAg assays. The ARCHITECT, AUSZYME MONOCLONAL and AxSYM assays (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), the ADVIA Centaur assay (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), and the Test System 3 and VITROS ECi assays (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) showed comparable sensitivity with wild-type HBsAg. The ARCHITECT, AUSZYME, and AxSYM assays detected all mutants that were tested. The Test System 3 and VITROS ECi assays failed to detect mutants with amino acid substitutions at positions 143, 144, and 145, which are located in the immunodominant "a" determinant. The ADVIA Centaur failed to detect substitutions at position 145 and showed negative or very low positive results for substitutions at position 143. The inability to detect HBsAg mutants may lead to misdiagnosis of hepatitis B virus infection. Further studies on the prevalence of HBsAg mutants and the ability of commercial assays to detect them are needed.

New Strategies for Blood Donor Screening for Hepatitis B Virus

Serologic testing for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) has historically been the foundation of blood screening, while HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was recently developed to detect HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative blood units donated during early acute infection. Comparison data on seroconversion panels using HBsAg assays of varying sensitivities and pooled- or single-sample NAT, along with viral load estimates corresponding to HBsAg assay detection limits, have provided information on the theoretical benefits of NAT relative to HBsAg. Model-derived estimates have generally been predictive of the yields of DNA-positive, HBsAg-negative window period blood units detected in a number of studies from Europe, Japan, and the US. Studies indicate that the added benefit of pooled-sample NAT is relatively small in areas of low endemicity, with greater yields in areas highly endemic for HBV. Single-sample NAT would offer more significant early window period closure and could prevent a moderate number of residual HBV transmissions not detected by HBsAg assays; however, no fully automated single-sample HBV NAT systems are currently available.Even single-sample HBV NAT may not substitute for anti-HBc screening, as indicated by studies of donors with isolated anti-HBc who have extremely low DNA levels undetectable by standard single-sample NAT and who have been associated with transfusion-transmitted HBV. Moreover, HBsAg testing may still be needed even in the setting of combined anti-HBc and NAT screening. HBsAg-positive units from donors in the chronic stage of infection may contain very low or intermittently detectable DNA levels that single-sample NAT would miss. Although such donors are usually anti-HBc reactive and would be interdicted by anti-HBc screening, some lack anti-HBc. Extensive parallel testing will be needed to determine whether single-sample NAT in combination with anti-HBc might be sufficient to detect all the infectious donors currently interdicted by HBsAg testing. In countries that do not screen for anti-HBc, HBsAg testing would be the only means of detecting donations from chronically infected individuals with low/intermittently detectable DNA, since even single-donor NAT would not identify these potentially infectious blood units. In the future, the current fully automated HBsAg assays may incorporate significant sensitivity improvements, and automated single-sample HBV NAT may become a reality. Each country will need to develop its blood screening strategy based on HBV endemicity, yields of infectious units detected by different serologic/NAT screening methods, and cost effectiveness of test methods in ensuring blood safety.