Hepatic Progression-free Survival Research Articles

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9–16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1–10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26–34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18–34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).ConclusionThe combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.

Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing. A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023. A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) Following Bland Embolization for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Rationale: Evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs) who have undergone prior bland hepatic transarterial embolization (TAE). Methods: Retrospective review of mNET patients who received PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE between 4/2018 and 02/2022 with and without prior TAE. The most recent clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings, including hepatic Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, were compared to pre-PRRT. Results: 171 patients (95 M, 76 F, median age = 66) with mNET of different primary sites (9 foregut, 100 midgut, 9 hindgut, 44 pancreas, 9 unknown) received at least 1 cycle of PRRT with at least 6 months of follow-up, 110 of whom were embolization-naïve and 61 who had prior TAE. The median follow up was 22 months (range: 6-43). Patients with prior TAE had higher liver tumor burden on average than patients without prior TAE; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the rates of G3 or G4 hepatotoxicity (p = 0.548 and p = 0.999, respectively) in patients who underwent prior TAE and those who were TAE-naïve. The hepatic progression-free survival was 22.9 months in TAE-naïve patients and 25.7, 20.2, and 12.8 months in patients with 1, 2, and 3 prior TAE treatments, respectively. Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy following transarterial bland embolization for mNET is safe and effective.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous arterial port Implantation for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

Approximately 40% of patients with colorectal cancer will develop liver metastases. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) represents a valuable treatment option, with curative, palliative, or adjuvant intent. The aim of our study was to describe technical considerations, safety, and oncological outcomes of patients receiving HAIC. All patients who underwent percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement in our institution between 2004 and 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. Demographic, anatomical and technical data were collected. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression-free survival (PFS). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 360 patients (median age, 58.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 49.5-65.4]; 208 men [57.8%]) were included. Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement was successful in 87.9% of cases, resulting in 379 port placements (431 attempts). Overall, 394 HAIC courses were delivered, mostly oxaliplatin-based (94.7%), with a median of 6 cycles per course (IQR: 3-8). AEs (all grades) were observed in 42.0% of ports (grade IIIb-V: 1.1%). Most port dysfunctions could be resolved, resulting in a 73.1% rate of HAIC resumption, without impact on OS. Median OS was 22 months (IQR: 18-24), and median hepatic PFS was 11 months (IQR: 9.5-13). Tumor downstaging allowed surgery in 35.6% of patients, with significantly longer median OS than non-operated patients (39 months [IQR: 33-79] versus 14 months [IQR: 12-16], p < 0.001). This retrospective cohort study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement with an impact on survival for selected patients. Percutaneous hepatic arterial port placement is feasible, safe and effective with an impact on the survival of selected patients. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy provides promising tumor response and overall survival, especially in cases of resection/ablation. Total complication rate of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy port use is high, but serious complications are rare. Port revision is often necessary but allows the resumption of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy without affecting overall survival.

Optimal patient selection for yttrium-90 glass plus chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases: additional quality of life, efficacy, and safety analyses from the EPOCH study.

Evaluating transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy (EPOCH) demonstrated superior outcomes using yttrium-90 glass microspheres plus chemotherapy (TARE/Chemo) vs chemotherapy (Chemo) to treat colorectal liver metastases. Additional exploratory analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of TARE/Chemo on efficacy, safety, time to subsequent therapy, time to deterioration in quality of life (QoL), and identify criteria for improved patient selection. Time to deterioration in QoL was analyzed for the primary study population. Subsequently, a post hoc analysis was undertaken to identify subgroups for which time to deterioration in QoL was improved with TARE/Chemo vs Chemo. Progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic (h)PFS, time to subsequent therapy, and safety outcomes were compared between treatments. The primary population showed no significant difference in time to deterioration in QoL between treatment arms; however, significance was seen in 2 identified subgroups, namely: Subgroup A (N = 303) which excluded patients with both Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 and baseline CEA ≥ 35 ng/mL from both treatment arms; subgroup B (N = 168) additionally excluded patients with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma) mutation. In subgroup A, TARE/Chemo patients (N = 143) demonstrated superior outcomes vs Chemo (N = 160): PFS (9.4 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 1-sided P = .0020), hPFS (10.8 vs. 7.6 months, HR: 0.53; 1-sided P < .0001), time to deterioration in QoL (5.7 vs. 3.9 months, HR: 0.65; 1-sided P = .0063), and time to subsequent therapy (21.2 vs. 10.5 months, HR: 0.52; 1-sided P < .0001). Subgroup B patients showed similar but larger significant differences between treatment arms. Median PFS, hPFS, and time to deterioration in QoL were numerically greater for TARE/Chemo in both subgroups vs the primary population, with the greatest magnitude of difference in subgroup B. Both subgroups exhibited higher percentage of CEA responders and improved ORR with TARE/Chemo vs chemo alone. Safety (reported as event rate/100 patient-years) was higher with Chemo in all populations. Additional efficacy analyses in the primary population are also reported. Careful patient selection, including consideration of the prognostic factors ECOG, baseline CEA, and KRAS status, sets outcome expectations in patients with colorectal liver metastases suitable for TARE/Chemo as second-line treatment (Trial Registry Number: NCT01483027).

Prognostic Evaluation and Survival Prediction for Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Following Hepatectomy.

This study aimed to assess prognostic factors associated with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to predict 5-year survival based on these factors. Patients who underwent definitive hepatectomy from 2006 to 2022 at a single institution was retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria involved a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of cHCC-CCA. A total of 80 patients with diagnosed cHCC-CCA were included in the analysis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.6 months, while distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS), and overall survival (OS) were 50.8, 21.5, and 85.1 months, respectively. In 52 cases of recurrence, intrahepatic recurrence was the most common initial recurrence (34/52), with distant metastasis in 17 cases. Factors associated with poor DMFS included tumor necrosis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion and histologic compact type. Postoperative CA19-9, tumor necrosis, LVI, and close/positive margin were associated with poor overall survival. LVI emerged as a key factor affecting both DMFS and OS, with a 5-year OS of 93.3% for patients without LVI compared to 35.8% with LVI. Based on these factors, a nomogram predicting 3-year and 5-year DMFS and OS was developed, demonstrating high concordance with actual survival in the cohort (Harrell C-index 0.809 for OS, 0.801 for DMFS, respectively). The prognosis of cHCC-CCA is notably poor when combined with lymphovascular invasion. Given the significant impact of adverse features, accurate outcome prediction is crucial. Moreover, consideration of adjuvant therapy may be warranted for patients exhibiting poor survival and increased risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of HepaSphere drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy alone in unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

3565 Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are widely employed treatments for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Limited evaluation exists regarding TACE plus HAIC versus HAIC alone. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combining HepaSphere DEB-TACE with HAIC compared to HAIC alone in patients with unresectable CRLM. Methods: A total of 259 CRLM patients aged over 18 years, treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital between March 2015 and November 2022, were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 157 patients received HepaSphere DEB-TACE combined with HAIC (DEB-TACE-HAIC), while 102 patients received HAIC alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to avoid selection bias and enable comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between the two cohorts. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints comprised hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: PSM resulted in 83 pairs, achieving comparable baseline between DEB-TACE-HAIC and HAIC cohorts. Of these pairs, 116 were male and 50 were female. Notably, 51.2% of patients harbored mutations in either KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF genes. Prior to enrollment, 94.6% of patients had received systemic treatments. Median hPFS, PFS and OS were all higher in the matched DEB-TACE-HAIC cohort (median hPFS: 7.6 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.023; median PFS: 5.1 vs. 3.5 months, P=0.092; median OS: 15.5 vs. 14.7 months, P=0.513). ORR was 37.3% in the DEB-TACE-HAIC group and 27.7% in the HAIC group, with DCR of 75.9% and 69.9%, respectively. There were no treatment related deaths. Serious adverse events were comparable between the two groups, except for nausea, which occurred more frequently in the HAIC group (39.8% vs. 22.9%, P=0.019). Conclusions: DEB-TACE-HAIC demonstrated superior survival compared to HAIC alone in unresectable CRLM, even in patients refractory to systemic therapy. The combination of HepaSphere DEB-TACE and HAIC appears promising as a regional treatment option with improved outcomes and a comparable safety profile.

Are survival outcomes dependent on the tumour dose threshold of 139 Gy in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization using glass particles? A real-world single-centre study.

To compare the survival and objective response rate (ORR) of the patients receiving estimated tumour absorbed dose (ETAD) <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with advanced chemorefractory colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (CRCLM) treated with yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE). Between August 2016 and August 2023 adult patients with unresectable, chemorefractory CRCLM treated with 90Y TARE using glass particles, were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS). Secondary outcome was ORR. A total of 40 patients with a mean age of 66.2 ± 7.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Mean ETAD for group 1 (ETAD <140 Gy) and group 2 (ETAD ≥140) were 131.2 ± 17.4 Gy versus 195 ± 45.6 Gy, respectively. The mean OS and hPFS for group 1 versus group 2 were 12 ± 10.3 months and 8.1 ± 9.3 months versus 9.3 ± 3 months and 7.1 ± 8.4 months, respectively and there were no significant differences (P = .181 and P = .366, respectively). ORR did not show significant difference between the groups (P = .432). In real-world practice, no significant difference was found in OS, hPFS, and ORR between patients who received ETAD <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with CRCLM, in this series. This study demonstrated that increased tumour absorbed doses in radioembolization may not provide additional significant advantage for OS and hPFS for patients with CRCLM.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in the Setting of Cytoreductive Hepatectomy.

Surgical cytoreduction for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NETLM) consistently shows positive long-term outcomes. Despite reservations in guidelines for surgery when the primary tumor is unidentified (UP-NET), this study compared the surgical and oncologic long-term outcomes between patients with these rare cases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and patients who had liver resection for known primaries. The study identified 32 unknown primary liver metastases (UP-NETLM) in 522 retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent resection of well-differentiated NETLM between January 2000 and December 2020. Tumor and patient characteristics were compared with those in 490 cases of liver metastasis from small intestinal (SI-NETLM) or pancreatic (pNETLM) primaries. Survival analysis was performed to highlight long-term outcome differences. Surgical outcomes were compared between liver resections alone and simultaneous primary resections to assess surgical risk distinctions. The UP-NET patients had fewer NETLMs (p = 0.004), which on the average were largerthan SI-NETLMs or pNETLMs (p = 0.002). Expression of Ki-67 was balanced among the groups. Major hepatectomy was performed more often in the UP-NETLM group (p = 0.017). The 10-year survival rate of 53% for UP-NETLM was comparable with that for SI-NETML (58%; p = 0.463) and pNETLMs (47%; p = 0.497). The median hepatic progression-free survival was 26 months for the UP-NETLM patients and 25 months for the SI-NETLM patients compared to 12 months for the pNETLM patients (p < 0.001). Perioperative mortality was lower than 2%, and severe postoperative morbidity occurred in 21%, similarly distributed among all the groups. The surgical risk and long-term outcomes for the UP-NETLM patients were comparable with those for other NETLM cases, affirming the validity of equally aggressive surgical cytoreduction as a therapeutic option in carefully selected cases.

Comparative outcomes of trans-arterial radioembolization in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-induced HCC: a retrospective analysis

PurposeTumorigenesis in NAFLD/NASH-induced HCC is unique and may affect the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization in this population. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of trans-arterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-NASH/NAFLD liver disease.Materials and methodsConsecutive patients with HCC who underwent TARE at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures including overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (PFS), and hepatic PFS as assessed by modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were recorded. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were utilized to compare progression-free survival and overall survival.Results138 separate HCCs in patients treated with TARE between July 2013 and July 2022 were retrospectively identified. Etiologies of HCC included NASH/NAFLD (30/122, 22%), HCV (52/122, 43%), alcoholic liver disease (25/122, 21%), and combined ALD/HCV (14/122, 11%). NASH/NAFLD patients demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.928), local progression-free survival (p = 0.339), or hepatic progression-free survival between the cohorts (p = 0.946) by log-rank analysis. When NASH/NAFLD patients were compared to all combined non-NASH/NAFLD patients, there was no significant difference in OS (HR 1.1, 95% C.I. 0.32–3.79, p = 0.886), local PFS (HR 1.2, 95% C.I. 0.58–2.44, p = 0.639), or hepatic PFS (HR 1.3, 95% C.I. 0.52–3.16, p = 0.595) by log-rank analysis.ConclusionTARE appears to be an equally effective treatment for NASH/NAFLD-induced HCC when compared to other causes of HCC. Further studies in a larger cohort with additional subgroup analyses are warranted.Graphical abstract

Chemoembolization Beyond Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Tumors Can We Treat and When?

Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.

Real-world data of anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in China.

738 Background: Patients with advanced gastrointestinal tumors, such as gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer (PC), often develop liver metastases with poor prognosis. Recent clinical studies have implicated that anlotinib (a novel anti-angiogenesis agent) could improve survival outcomes in gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases, albeit with limited real-world evidence. This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in real-world practice. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of patients treated with anlotinib in any line of treatment for solid tumors with liver metastases (excluding primary liver cancer) was collected retrospectively through 5 large hospitals in China, between Jan, 2016 and Feb, 2023. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective overall response (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), hepatic ORR (hORR) and safety. In this abstract, we present data from patients with gastrointestinal tumors. PFS, hPFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 475 patients were enrolled in the study and 238 patients with gastrointestinal tumors were analyzed, including 73 (30.7%) GC, 71 (29.8%) CRC, 46 (19.3%) ESCC, 24 (10.1%) PC, and 24 (10.1%) BTC. 75.2% were &lt;75 years old, 82.4% were male, 63.9% had a normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5-24 kg/m2), 87.8% received third-line anlotinib, and 90.3% received anlotinib monotherapy. At data cut-off (Feb 28, 2023), the median PFS was 5.90 months (95% CI: 5.23-6.77), the median hPFS was 6.20 months (95% CI: 5.27-6.77), and the median OS was 9.37 months (95% CI: 8.40-NR). There was no statistically significant difference according to the tumor types in terms of PFS (p=0.66), hPFS (p=0.8) and OS (p=0.72). We also found patients with a BMI &lt; 18.5 kg/m2 had significantly shorter PFS (p=0.005) and hPFS (p=0.01). Adverse events (AEs) were manageable and tolerable, 30 (12.6%) patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and 3 patients (1.3%) had ≥3 TEAEs. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (5.9%). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world report about anlotinib for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases in China, showed the clinical benefit of anlotinib in any line of treatment for gastrointestinal tumors with liver metastases and indicated that anlotinib could be a feasible treatment option in this specific population.

Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of PDS0301 in combination with hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

TPS586 Background: Treatment of advanced liver tumors continues to pose significant challenges. Despite advances in immunotherapies, including immune checkpoint blockade, responses in colorectal liver metastases and biliary tract cancers remain suboptimal. The lack of robust clinical efficacy is likely myriad, including immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment and poor susceptibility of these tumors to immune infiltration and surveillance. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with extensive anti-tumor properties, but therapeutic development of recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12) was halted due to significant systemic toxicities. PDS0301 (formerly M9241) is a novel human monoclonal antibody (NHS76) fused to two IL-12 heterodimers. The NHS76 antibody specifically targets histone/DNA complexes in regions of cellular necrosis resulting in accumulation within tumors. Importantly, recent Phase I trials have shown PDS0301 monotherapy to be well tolerated. We hypothesize that synchronization of PDS0301 administration with tumor cell death induced by locoregional and systemic chemotherapies will demonstrate increased efficacy over standard of care therapy. Methods: This is a single center, non-randomized Phase II study to determine the safety and efficacy of PDS0301 in combination with floxuridine (FUDR) administered by hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) and systemic chemotherapies in patients with either unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver (Cohort 1) or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with no evidence of extrahepatic metastases (Cohort 2). Patients will receive HAIP-administered (FUDR) plus PDS0301 at a starting dose of 12mcg/kg in 28-day cycles. Beginning in cycle 2, systemic chemotherapy with FOLFOX (Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil [5-FU], and Oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (Leucovorin, 5-FU and Irinotecan) for mCRC or GemOx (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin) for ICC will be introduced. Patients will be evaluated for response at eight-week intervals. The primary endpoint is overall response rates to PDS0301 and HAIP/systemic combination therapy. Secondary objectives include hepatic progression-free survival (PFS), extra-hepatic PFS, overall survival, and safety. Scientific objectives include determination of microenvironment alterations through pre-and post-treatment biopsies as well as evaluation of peripheral immune subsets and cytokines. To date, we have enrolled 8 of 23 patients in Cohort 1. Clinical trial information: NCT05286814 .

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for patients with liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Objectives This study aimed to analyze the survival outcomes and prognostic factors of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods Between March 2011 and November 2022, 34 patients (16 males; age range, 25–72 [median age, 52.5] years) who underwent RFA for liver metastasis from GISTs were included. The mean maximum diameter of metastatic lesions was 2.4 ± 1.0 (range, 1.1–5.2) cm. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results For 79 lesions among 34 patients, all targeted lesions were completely ablated. The mean hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) period was 28.4 ± 3.8 (range, 1.0–45.7) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year HPFS rates were 67.2%, 60.5%, and 20.2%, respectively. Based on the univariate analysis, the number of metastatic tumors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKI) therapy before RFA were prognostic factors for HPFS. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-RFA TKI therapy was associated with a better HPFS(p = 0.030). The mean overall survival (OS) period was 100.5 ± 14.1 (range, 3.8–159.5) months and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 96.9%, 77.1%, and 58.7%, respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that extrahepatic metastasis before RFA (p = 0.044) was a significant prognostic factor for OS. Conclusions Liver metastases from GIST exhibit relatively mild biological behavior. RFA is safe and effective, particularly in patients without pre-RFA extrahepatic metastases. Patients received targeted therapy before RFA can obtain an extended HPFS.

Circulating Regulatory T Cells: A Novel Marker Associated with Liver Metastasis and the Treatment Response of Transarterial Embolization in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs) as a novel marker associated with liver metastases and treatment response to transarterial embolization (TAE) in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Methods: Circulating Tregs, defined as the CD4+CD25+CD127low/− population, were examined by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with GEP-NETs. Clinicopathological parameters, radiologic response, and hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) data were collected. Results: The association between circulating Tregs and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed in 139 GEP-NET patients. Higher Treg levels were significantly associated with more progressive clinical features, including a higher WHO grade, more advanced TNM stage, and the presence of liver metastases. A Treg level ≥8.015% distinguished between patients with and without liver metastases. Among a cohort of 51 GEP-NET patients who were subjected to TAE for reducing liver metastasis burden, patients with higher Treg levels depicted unfavorable responses and significantly reduced hPFS after TAE treatment. We also revealed that patients with Treghigh (≥8.975%) displayed significantly shorter median hPFS than patients with Treglow (<8.975%). Additionally, after adjusting for other confounding clinical parameters, the association between Tregs and treatment response as well as hPFS remained significant, suggesting that Tregs may have a strong and independent prognostic impact in GEP-NETs. Conclusion: Our data suggest that circulating Tregs are a novel immunological marker associated with liver metastases and treatment response to TAE in patients with GEP-NETs.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases treated using transarterial radioembolization: Identification of prognostic parameters at 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

PurposeTo identify prognostic clinical and imaging parameters for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Materials and methodsForty-seven patients (27 men; mean age, 64 years) with NELMs who received TARE, along with pre-procedure liver MRI and 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography were included. Apparent diffusion coefficient and standardized uptake value (SUV) of three liver metastases, normal spleen and liver were measured. SUVmax or SUVmean were used for the calculation of tumor-to-organ ratios (tumor-to-spleen and tumor-to-liver ratios) using all possible combinations (including SUVmax/SUVmax, SUVmax/SUVmean, and SUVmean/SUVmean). Clinical parameters (hepatic tumor-burden, presence of extra-hepatic metastases, chromograninA, Ki-67 and bilirubin levels) were assessed. Overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. ResultsMedian overall survival, PFS and HPFS were 49.6, 13.1 and 28.3 months, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, low Ki-67 (≤ 5%), low hepatic tumor-burden (< 10%), absence of extrahepatic metastases, and increased Tmean/Lmax ratio were significant prognostic factors of longer overall survival and HPFS. High baseline chromograninA (> 1330 ng/mL) was associated with shorter HPFS. Tmean/Lmax > 1.9 yielded a median overall survival of 69 vs. 33 months (P < 0.04), and a median HPFS of 30 vs. 19 months (P = 0.09). For PFS, high baseline SUVmax of NELMs was the single significant parameter in the multivariable model. SUVmax > 28 resulted in a median PFS of 16.9 vs. 6.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001). ConclusionHigh preinterventional Tmean/Lmax ratios, and high SUVmax on 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography/computed tomography seem to have prognostic value in patients with NELMs undergoing TARE, potentially aiding patient selection and management alongside conventional variables.

Efficacy and safety of irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere transarterial chemoembolization combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

3585 Background: Both drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are recommended for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treatment. However, the combined application of DEB-TACE and HAIC is not widely accepted. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere chemoembolization combined with HAIC for unresectable CRLM. Methods: Patients with age older than 18 years, histologically confirmed CRLM and treated with Irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere chemoembolization plus HAIC from Oct 2020 to Jan 2022 were enrolled. Patients who had synchronously received other local treatments were excluded. Hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AE) were evaluated with CTCAE 5.0. Results: The eligible population was 101, composed of 66 males and 35 females. Among them, 54% patients had one of KRAS or NRAS or BRAF gene mutation and ECOG of 62% patients was 1. In addition, 59% patients were refractory to second standard line or above systemic therapy and mean interventional treatment cycles were 3.3. As the follow-up cutoff date was Dec 31, 2022, median duration of follow-up was 17.9 months (95% CI,16.185-19.615). Median hPFS was 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.744-10.658) while median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.048-7.352). For the patients who were refractory to second line or above systemic therapy, hPFS and PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.899-7.501) and 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.682-6.718) respectively. Overall survival has not been reached yet. There were 7 patients achieved clinical complete response. Overall response rate was 41.6% and disease control rate was 82.2%. There was no treatment-related death. 28 patients (27.7%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicities. The most common treatment related AE were aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase elevation (41.6%) and bilirubin elevation (40.6%). The hematologic AE included anemia (27.7%), leukopenia (27.7%), neutropenia (14.9%) and thrombocytopenia (28.7%). Conclusions: The combination of Irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere chemoembolization and HAIC is effective and safe for unresectable CRCLM, even for patients who are refractory to second or above systemic therapy, indicating it is a promising regional treatment with improved outcome.

Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Glass Microspheres as a First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma—A Prospective Feasibility Study

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization as first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Materials and MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients who had never received chemotherapy, liver embolization, and radiation therapy. The tumors were solitary in 16 patients, multiple in 8 patients, unilobar in 14 patients, and bilobar in 10 patients. Patients underwent transarterial radioembolization with 90Y-labeled glass microspheres. The primary end point was hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity. ResultsTwenty-four patients (age, 72.3 years ± 9.3; 12 women) were included in the study. The median delivered radiation dose was 135.5 Gy (interquartile range, 77.6 Gy). The median HPFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.9–7.0 months). Analysis failed to identify any prognostic factor associated with HPFS. Imaging response at 3 months showed 56% disease control, and the best radiographic response was 71% disease control. The median OS from the radioembolization treatment was 19.4 months (95% CI, 5.0–33.7). Patients with solitary ICC had significantly longer median OS than patients with multifocal ICC: 25.9 months (95% CI, 20.8–31.0 months) versus 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.0–13.4 months) (P = .02). Patients with progression on the 3-month imaging follow-up had significantly shorter median OS than patients who had stable disease at 3 months: 10.7 months (95% CI, 0.7–20.7 months) versus 37.3 months (95% CI, 16.5–58.1 months) (P = .003). Two (8%) Grade 3 toxicities were reported. ConclusionsFirst-line treatment of ICC with radioembolization showed promising OS and minimal toxicity, especially in patients with solitary tumor. Radioembolization may be considered as a first-line treatment option for unresectable ICC.

Hepatic disease control in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma correlates with overall survival.

The role of locoregional therapy compared to systemic chemotherapy (SYS) for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) remains controversial. The importance of hepatic disease control, either as initial or salvage therapy, is also unclear. We compared overall survival (OS) in patients treated with resection, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, or SYS as it relates to hepatic recurrence or progression. We also evaluated recurrence after resection to determine the efficacy of locoregional salvage therapy. In this single-institution retrospective analysis, patients with biopsy-proven IHC treated with either curative-intent resection, HAIP (with or without SYS), or SYS alone were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare patients with liver-limited, advanced disease treated with HAIP versus SYS. The impact of locoregional salvage therapies in patients with liver-limited recurrence was analyzed in the resection cohort. From 2000 to 2017, 714 patients with IHC were treated, 219 (30.7%) with resectable disease, 316 (44.3%) with locally advanced disease, and 179 (25.1%) with metastatic disease. Resected patients were less likely to recur or progress in the liver (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.45) versus those that received HAIP or SYS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.65 vs. HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.69, respectively). In resected patients, 161 (64.4%) recurred, with 65 liver-only recurrences. Thirty of these patients received subsequent locoregional therapy. On multivariable analysis, locoregional therapy was associated with improved OS after isolated liver recurrence (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; p = 0.002). In patients with locally advanced unresectable or multifocal liver disease (with or without distant organ metastases), PSM demonstrated improved hepatic progression-free survival in patients treated with HAIP versus SYS (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.46-0.91; p = 0.01), which correlated with improved OS (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.80; p < 0.001). In patients with liver-limited IHC, hepatic disease control is associated with improved OS, emphasizing the potential importance of liver-directed therapy.

Survival of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases after Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan-Eluting Microspheres: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Comparing RECIST 1.1 and Choi Criteria

PurposeTo evaluate the factors that affected overall survival and hepatic progression–free survival using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and Choi criteria in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using irinotecan-eluting microspheres (IEMs) who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy. Materials and MethodsA single-institution retrospective analysis was performed including patients with unresectable liver metastases from a colorectal primary malignancy and treated with IEM-TACE. Radiologic hepatic progression–free survival was measured using the RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. ResultsThe median patient age was 61.5 years, with 80 (67%) men. A total of 328 IEM-TACE procedures were performed during the study period. One hundred eighteen patients who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy before TACE demonstrated a median overall survival of 12.7 months. Overall survival was higher in patients who had previous primary resection (P < .05), prior ablation (P < .05), or completed the scheduled TACE treatments (P < .05) but was adversely affected by the presence of extrahepatic disease (P < .05) and larger preprocedural tumor burden (P < .01). Prior systemic chemotherapy lines (P = .98) and microsphere size (P = .34) did not affect survival. Partial radiologic response to treatment using the Choi criteria (n = 28, P < .01) correlated significantly with survival, a correlation not seen with the RECIST 1.1 measurements (n = 5, P = .13). ConclusionsA partial response to treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated by TACE with IEMs measured using the Choi criteria correlated significantly with improved survival, while RECIST 1.1 measurements did not.