Background: Prescribing information of nesiritide mandate 25 mL priming of IV tubings, prior to connecting to pt's IV access, since the drug may partially absorb to the line. Thus, 1/10 of reconstituted vial is wasted, with a cost of $40–50 per line used. No study quantified binding effect of IV tubings, nor tested binding properties of different materials, nor analyzed binding effect of central lines, where priming cannot occur. Furthermore, prescribing information state that nesiritide must not be administered through a central heparin-coated catheter, since it may bind to heparin. However, no study quantified this binding effect. Methods: 1.5 mg vials of nesiritide were reconstituted into 250 mL 0.9% NS IV bags. 23.3mL bolus, followed by 7mL/h 2-hour infusion (2ug/kg bolus, 0.01ug/kg/min infusion for a 70kg pt) were run, in duplicate, through: 1) Standard PVC peripheral IV tubing primed with a 25 mL of nesiritide; 2) Standard non-primed PVC peripheral IV tubing; 3) Non-primed polyethylene peripheral IV tubing, commonly used for NTG infusion; 4) Non-primed PVC peripheral IV tubing, connected distally to a central IV polyurethane catheter; 5) Non-primed PVC peripheral IV tubing, connected distally to a heparin-coated pulmonary artery PVC catheter. Nesiritide concentration was measured, in triplicates, in the IV bags and samples collected from the five IV settings, using Biosite BNP test (Beckman Coulter). Results: CV for duplicate experiments was 3.4%. At least 95% of nesiritide was recovered from all five IV settings. Priming of PVC tubings with nesiritide improved drug recovery by 2% during IV bolus and 2-hour infusion compared to non-primed PVC tubings. Polyethylene tubings improved drug recovery also by 2% at 1- and 2-hour time points, suggesting that polyethylene saturates faster than PVC. Connecting a triple lumen or heparin-coated pulmonary artery catheter distally to non-primed PVC tubings did not further impact percentage of drug recovery. Conclusions: Priming of peripheral IV tubings with 25mL of nesiritide minimally improves drug release to pts, since>95% of drug is delivered even without priming. Polyethylene IV tubings further minimize drug binding and offers an even more reliable, yet inexpensive, alternative to priming. Elimination of priming may result in $40–50 saving per line used. Use of central lines or heparin-coated pulmonary catheter does not result in significant binding. Thus, changes in nesiritide prescribing information are warranted.