Abstract Background/Introduction Same-day discharge has become a standard of care for patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) treated with ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). QuickClot Radial kaolin-based haemostatic device may shorten haemostasis time and reduce the incidence of vascular site complications. Besides unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA), an ad hoc procedure demands a loading dose of clopidogrel. Dynamic changes in platelets and thrombotic activity may influence the outcomes at vascular sites. Rapid "point-of-care" testing measures the effects of anticoagulation but the optimal threshold during and after PCI still requires further research. Purpose We investigated the effect of a standard dose of UFH and a loading dose of clopidogrel measured with point-of-care devices: Hemochron activated clotting time device (ACT), VerifyNow P2Y12 test on on-site outcomes. Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients with CCS who qualified for ad hoc PCI. Patients were on chronic ASA therapy, received 100 IU/kg UFH, and a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel. ACT was measured before and 10 min, 2 h, and 6 h after the administration of UFH and clopidogrel, respectively, and the VerifyNow P2Y12 test measured after 2 and 6 h. A QuickClot haemostatic pad with gradually released compression for up to 2 h was used in all patients. Ultrasonographic assessment of artery diameter and patency was performed before and 6 h after the procedure. Bleeding (BARC criteria) or local haematoma (EASY scale) were observed regularly until hospital discharge. Results Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The mean±SD age was 68.8±8.8 years, 30 (75%) patients were men, 13 (35%) had diabetes, 38 (95%) hypertension, 16 (40%) previous myocardial infarction, and 15 (37,5%) were active smokers. Patients received a median [interquartile range (IQR)] 8000 [7000-9000] IU of UFH and 600 mg of clopidogrel. All of the radial arteries remained patent during observation; local bleeding (BARC 2) was observed in 11 (27,5%) and haematomas (EASY 1 and 2) in 11 (27,5%) patients. Patients with bleeding had lower platelet activity measured with platelet reactivity units (PRU) after 2 h (122.5± 51 vs 158.7± 43, p= 0.04) and higher ACT (s) (216.9 ±40 vs. 184.6±28 s, p=0.006). An ACT >196 s, measured 2 h after the procedure, predicted the occurrence of bleeding or haematoma (AUC 0.72; 95%CI 0.56-0.85, p=0.008). Conclusion Lower platelet activity and higher ACT after PCI were associated with higher risk of haemorrhagic site complications. "Point-of-care" measures post PCI in CCS patients may be clinically applicable.