Hemiarthroplasty For Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty Is Associated With Higher 30-Day Complication Rates Compared With Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA) have both been shown to have good outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. However, evidence comparing perioperative complications between these procedures in this population is heterogeneous. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried between the years 2012 and 2021 (10 years in total) for records of patients who underwent either TSA or HA for osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint. Patients in each group underwent a 1:1 propensity match for demographic variables. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare complications and risk factors between these cohorts. A total of 4376 propensity-matched patients, with 2188 receiving TSA and 2188 receiving HA, were included in the primary analyses. The HA cohort had a higher rate of any adverse event (7.18% vs 4.8%, P=.001), death (0.69% vs 0.1%, P=.004), sepsis (0.46% vs 0.1%, P=.043), postoperative transfusion (4.62% vs 2.2%, P<.001), postoperative intubation (0.5% vs 0.1%, P=.026), and extended length of stay (23.77% vs 13.1%, P<.001). HA was found to increase the odds of developing these complications when baseline demographics were controlled. Older age (odds ratio, 1.040; 95% CI, 1.021-1.059; P<.001) and lower body mass index (odds ratio, 0.949; 95% CI, 0.923-0.975; P<.001) increased the odds of having any adverse event in the HA cohort but not in the TSA cohort. Compared with TSA, HA appears to be associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day postoperative complications when performed for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):217-224.].

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Tried and True

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a reliable procedure to treat primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The purpose of this review is to highlight the important discoveries regarding TSA, underscore its longevity, and compare its results with alternative reconstructive options. When comparing the results of TSA to hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, the authors of numerous well-designed studies have found TSA to provide superior pain relief, function, and long-term survival. Cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components have excellent long-term survival, whereas metal-backed glenoid components have shown high rates of failure. TSA has stood the test of time and remains the gold standard treatment for glenohumeral arthritis.

Hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis in shoulder with dysplastic morphology

Hemiarthroplasty for shoulder osteoarthritis with a glenoid dysplasia gives satisfactory results at medium-range follow-up. From 1998 to 2006, 9 patients (10 shoulders) with glenoid dysplasia and osteoarthritis were treated with shoulder hemiarthroplasty. The mean age at surgery was 54 years (range, 44-73 years). At a minimum of 24 months after surgery, all patients were retrospectively reviewed with a clinical and radiographic evaluation. The average duration of follow-up was 71 months (range, 28-126 months). One shoulder underwent revision surgery for anterior dislocation within 6 months after the initial procedure. The pain level improved significantly, with no or slight pain for 9 of the 10 shoulders. Postoperatively active external rotation and anterior elevation increased significantly, with a mean of 34.5° and 124°, respectively. The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.5 points at the last follow-up, and results were considered as excellent or satisfactory in 7 shoulders according to the modified Neer rating scale. Erosion of the glenoid was considered as slight on radiographs, and radiolucencies were seen around humeral stem in one case. The opportunity of glenoid component implantation in case of anatomic shoulder replacement with dysplastic morphology has to be carefully evaluate because of bone stock insufficiency, glenoid orientation, and the age of patients. Despite a limited number of patients in this study, hemiarthroplasty gave satisfactory clinical results in most cases. It seems to be a reliable option to treat osteoarthritis in case of dysplastic morphology of shoulder.