Helicase Loading Research Articles

Biochemical Analysis of a DNA Replication Origin in the Archaeon Aeropyrum pernix

We have characterised the interaction of the Aeropyrum pernix origin recognition complex proteins (ORC1 and ORC2) with DNA using DNase I footprinting. Each protein binds upstream of its respective gene. However, ORC1 protein alone interacts more tightly with an additional region containing multiple origin recognition box (ORB) sites that we show to be a replication origin. At this origin, there are four ORB elements disposed either side of an A + T-rich region. An ORC1 protein dimer binds at each of these ORB sites. Once all four ORB sites have bound ORC1 protein, there is a transition to a higher-order assembly with a defined alteration in topology and superhelicity. Furthermore, after this transition, the A + T-rich region becomes sensitive to digestion by DNase I and P 1 nuclease, revealing that the transition promotes distortion of the DNA in this region, presumably as a prelude to loading of MCM helicase.

Rep and PriA helicase activities prevent RecA from provoking unnecessary recombination during replication fork repair

The rescue of replication forks stalled on the template DNA was investigated using an assay for synthetic lethality that provides a visual readout of cell viability and permits investigation of why certain mutations are lethal when combined. The results presented show that RecA and other recombination proteins are often engaged during replication because RecA is present and provokes recombination rather than because recombination is necessary. This occurs particularly frequently in cells lacking the helicase activities of Rep and PriA. We propose that these two proteins normally limit the loading of RecA on ssDNA regions exposed on the leading strand template of damaged forks, and do so by unwinding the nascent lagging strand, thus facilitating reannealing of the parental strands. Gap closure followed by loading of the DnaB replicative helicase enables synthesis of the leading strand to continue. Without either activity, RecA loads more frequently on the DNA and drives fork reversal, which creates a chickenfoot structure and a requirement for other recombination proteins to re-establish a viable fork. The assay also reveals that stalled transcription complexes are common impediments to fork progression, and that damaged forks often reverse independently of RecA.

Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the DnaA-like core of the origin recognition complex

Structural details of initiator proteins for DNA replication have provided clues to the molecular events in this process. EM reconstructions of the Drosophila melanogaster origin recognition complex (ORC) reveal nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the core of the complex. All five AAA+ domains in ORC contain a conserved structural element that, in DnaA, promotes formation of a right-handed helix, indicating that helical AAA+ substructures may be a feature of all initiators. A DnaA helical pentamer can be docked into ORC, and the location of Orc5 uniquely positions this core. The results suggest that ATP-dependent conformational changes observed in ORC derive from reorientation of the AAA+ domains. By analogy to the DNA-wrapping activity of DnaA, we posit that ORC together with Cdc6 prepares origin DNA for helicase loading through mechanisms related to the established pathway of prokaryotes.

MutL-catalyzed ATP Hydrolysis Is Required at a Post-UvrD Loading Step in Methyl-directed Mismatch Repair

Methyl-directed mismatch repair is a coordinated process that ensures replication fidelity and genome integrity by resolving base pair mismatches and insertion/deletion loops. This post-replicative event involves the activities of several proteins, many of which appear to be regulated by MutL. MutL interacts with and modulates the activities of MutS, MutH, UvrD, and perhaps other proteins. The purified protein catalyzes a slow ATP hydrolysis reaction that is essential for its role in mismatch repair. However, the role of the ATP hydrolysis reaction is not understood. We have begun to address this issue using two point mutants: MutL-E29A, which binds nucleotide but does not catalyze ATP hydrolysis, and MutL-D58A, which does not bind nucleotide. As expected, both mutants failed to complement the loss of MutL in genetic assays. Purified MutL-E29A protein interacted with MutS and stimulated the MutH-catalyzed nicking reaction in a mismatch-dependent manner. Importantly, MutL-E29A stimulated the loading of UvrD on model substrates. In fact, stimulation of UvrD-catalyzed unwinding was more robust with MutL-E29A than the wild-type protein. MutL-D58A, on the other hand, did not interact with MutS, stimulate MutH-catalyzed nicking, or stimulate the loading of UvrD. We conclude that ATP-bound MutL is required for the incision steps associated with mismatch repair and that ATP hydrolysis by MutL is required for a step in the mismatch repair pathway subsequent to the loading of UvrD and may serve to regulate helicase loading.

Genetic Evidence for the Requirement of RecA Loading Activity in SOS Induction after UV Irradiation inEscherichia coli

The SOS response in Escherichia coli results in the coordinately induced expression of more than 40 genes which occurs when cells are treated with DNA-damaging agents. This response is dependent on RecA (coprotease), LexA (repressor), and the presence of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). A prerequisite for SOS induction is the formation of a RecA-ssDNA filament. Depending on the DNA substrate, the RecA-ssDNA filament is produced by either RecBCD, RecFOR, or a hybrid recombination mechanism with specific enzyme activities, including helicase, exonuclease, and RecA loading. In this study we examined the role of RecA loading activity in SOS induction after UV irradiation. We performed a genetic analysis of SOS induction in strains with a mutation which eliminates RecA loading activity in the RecBCD enzyme (recB1080 allele). We found that RecA loading activity is essential for SOS induction. In the recB1080 mutant RecQ helicase is not important, whereas RecJ nuclease slightly decreases SOS induction after UV irradiation. In addition, we found that the recB1080 mutant exhibited constitutive expression of the SOS regulon. Surprisingly, this constitutive SOS expression was dependent on the RecJ protein but not on RecFOR, implying that there is a different mechanism of RecA loading for constitutive SOS expression.

Functions of Multiple Exonucleases Are Essential for Cell Viability, DNA Repair and Homologous Recombination inrecDMutants ofEscherichia coli

Heterotrimeric RecBCD enzyme unwinds and resects a DNA duplex containing blunt double-stranded ends and directs loading of the strand-exchange protein RecA onto the unwound 3'-ending strand, thereby initiating the majority of recombination in wild-type Escherichia coli. When the enzyme lacks its RecD subunit, the resulting RecBC enzyme, active in recD mutants, is recombination proficient although it has only helicase and RecA loading activity and is not a nuclease. However, E. coli encodes for several other exonucleases that digest double-stranded and single-stranded DNA and thus might act in consort with the RecBC enzyme to efficiently promote recombination reactions. To test this hypothesis, I inactivated multiple exonucleases (i.e., exonuclease I, exonuclease X, exonuclease VII, RecJ, and SbcCD) in recD derivatives of the wild-type and nuclease-deficient recB1067 strain and assessed the ability of the resultant mutants to maintain cell viability and to promote DNA repair and homologous recombination. A complex pattern of overlapping and sometimes competing activities of multiple exonucleases in recD mutants was thus revealed. These exonucleases were shown to be essential for cell viability, DNA repair (of UV- and gamma-induced lesions), and homologous recombination (during Hfr conjugation and P1 transduction), which are dependent on the RecBC enzyme. A model for donor DNA processing in recD transconjugants and transductants was proposed.

Site-directed Mutations of T4 Helicase Loading Protein (gp59) Reveal Multiple Modes of DNA Polymerase Inhibition and the Mechanism of Unlocking by gp41 Helicase

The T4 helicase loading protein (gp59) interacts with a multitude of DNA replication proteins. In an effort to determine the functional consequences of these protein-protein interactions, point mutations were introduced into the gp59 protein. Mutations were chosen based on the available crystal structure and focused on hydrophobic residues with a high degree of solvent accessibility. Characterization of the mutant proteins revealed a single mutation, Y122A, which is defective in polymerase binding and has weakened affinity for the helicase. The interaction between single-stranded DNA-binding protein and Y122A is unaffected, as is the affinity of Y122A for DNA substrates. When standard concentrations of helicase are employed, Y122A is unable to productively load the helicase onto forked DNA substrates. As a result of the loss of polymerase binding, Y122A cannot inhibit the polymerase during nucleotide idling or prevent it from removing the primer strand of a D-loop. However, Y122A is capable of inhibiting strand displacement synthesis by polymerase. The retention of strand displacement inhibition by Y122A, even in the absence of a gp59-polymerase interaction, indicates that there are two modes of polymerase inhibition by gp59. Inhibition of the polymerase activity only requires gp59 to bind to the replication fork, whereas inhibition of the exonuclease activity requires an interaction between the polymerase and gp59. The inability of Y122A to interact with both the polymerase and the helicase suggests a mechanism for polymerase unlocking by the helicase based on a direct competition between the helicase and polymerase for an overlapping binding site on gp59.

Sequential ATP Hydrolysis by Cdc6 and ORC Directs Loading of the Mcm2-7 Helicase

Loading of the Mcm2-7 DNA replicative helicase onto origin-proximal DNA is a critical and tightly regulated event during the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication. The resulting protein-DNA assembly is called the prereplicative complex (pre-RC), and its formation requires the origin recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6, Cdt1, and ATP. ATP hydrolysis by ORC is required for multiple rounds of Mcm2-7 loading. Here, we investigate the role of ATP hydrolysis by Cdc6 during pre-RC assembly. We find that Cdc6 is an ORC- and origin DNA-dependent ATPase that functions at a step preceding ATP hydrolysis by ORC. Inhibiting Cdc6 ATP hydrolysis stabilizes Cdt1 on origin DNA and prevents Mcm2-7 loading. In contrast, the initial association of Mcm2-7 with the other pre-RC components does not require ATP hydrolysis by Cdc6. Importantly, these coordinated yet distinct functions of ORC and Cdc6 ensure the correct temporal and spatial regulation of pre-RC formation.

Cdt1 revisited: complex and tight regulation during the cell cycle and consequences of deregulation in mammalian cells

In eukaryotic cells, replication of genomic DNA initiates from multiple replication origins distributed on multiple chromosomes. To ensure that each origin is activated precisely only once during each S phase, a system has evolved which features periodic assembly and disassembly of essential pre-replication complexes (pre-RCs) at replication origins. The pre-RC assembly reaction involves the loading of a presumptive replicative helicase, the MCM2-7 complexes, onto chromatin by the origin recognition complex (ORC) and two essential factors, CDC6 and Cdt1. The eukaryotic cell cycle is driven by the periodic activation and inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and assembly of pre-RCs can only occur during the low Cdk activity period from late mitosis through G1 phase, with inappropriate re-assembly suppressed during S, G2, and M phases. It was originally suggested that inhibition of Cdt1 function after S phase in vertebrate cells is due to geminin binding and that Cdt1 hyperfunction resulting from Cdt1-geminin imbalance induces re-replication. However, recent progress has revealed that Cdt1 activity is more strictly regulated by two other mechanisms in addition to geminin: (1) functional and SCFSkp2-mediated proteolytic regulation through phosphorylation by Cdks; and (2) replication-coupled proteolysis mediated by the Cullin4-DDB1Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase and PCNA, an eukaryotic sliding clamp stimulating replicative DNA polymerases. The tight regulation implies that Cdt1 control is especially critical for the regulation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. Indeed, Cdt1 overexpression evokes chromosomal damage even without re-replication. Furthermore, deregulated Cdt1 induces chromosomal instability in normal human cells. Since Cdt1 is overexpressed in cancer cells, this could be a new molecular mechanism leading to carcinogenesis. In this review, recent insights into Cdt1 function and regulation in mammalian cells are discussed.

The Interaction between the T4 Helicase Loading Protein (gp59) and the DNA Polymerase (gp43): a Locking Mechanism to Delay Replication during Replisome Assembly

The Interaction between the T4 Helicase Loading Protein (gp59) and the DNA Polymerase (gp43): a Locking Mechanism to Delay Replication during Replisome Assembly

Formation of an ATP-DnaA-specific Initiation Complex Requires DnaA Arginine 285, a Conserved Motif in the AAA+ Protein Family

Escherichia coli DnaA protein, a member of the AAA+ superfamily, initiates replication from the chromosomal origin oriC in an ATP-dependent manner. Nucleoprotein complex formed on oriC with the ATP-DnaA multimer but not the ADP-DnaA multimer is competent to unwind the oriC duplex. The oriC region contains ATP-DnaA-specific binding sites termed I2 and I3, which stimulate ATP-DnaA-dependent oriC unwinding. In this study, we show that the DnaA R285A mutant is inactive for oriC replication in vivo and in vitro and that the mutation is associated with specific defects in oriC unwinding. In contrast, activities of DnaA R285A are sustained in binding to the typical DnaA boxes and to ATP and ADP, formation of multimeric complexes on oriC, and loading of the DnaB helicase onto single-stranded DNA. Footprint analysis of the DnaA-oriC complex reveals that the ATP form of DnaA R285A does not interact with ATP-DnaA-specific binding sites such as the I sites. A subgroup of DnaA molecules in the oriC complex must contain the Arg-285 residue for initiation. Sequence and structural analyses suggest that the DnaA Arg-285 residue is an arginine finger, an AAA+ family-specific motif that recognizes ATP bound to an adjacent subunit in a multimeric complex. In the context of these and previous results, the DnaA Arg-285 residue is proposed to play a unique role in the ATP-dependent conformational activation of an initial complex by recognizing ATP bound to DnaA and by modulating the structure of the DnaA multimer to allow interaction with ATP-DnaA-specific binding sites in the complex.

An Essential Tryptophan of Escherichia coli DnaA Protein Functions in Oligomerization at the E. coli Replication Origin

In the initiation of bacterial DNA replication, DnaA protein recruits DnaB helicase to the chromosomal origin, oriC, leading to the assemble of the replication fork machinery at this site. Because a region near the N terminus of DnaA is required for self-oligomerization and the loading of DnaB helicase at oriC, we asked if these functions are separable or interdependent by substituting many conserved amino acids in this region with alanine to identify essential residues. We show that alanine substitutions of leucine 3, phenylalanine 46, and leucine 62 do not affect DnaA function in initiation. In contrast, we find on characterization of a mutant DnaA that tryptophan 6 is essential for DnaA function because its substitution by alanine abrogates self-oligomerization, resulting in the failure to load DnaB at oriC. These results indicate that DnaA bound to oriC forms a specific oligomeric structure, which is required to load DnaB helicase.

The Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction: A Common Structural/Functional Module

The lack of a high-resolution structure for the bacterial helicase-primase complex and the fragmented structural information for the individual proteins have been hindering our detailed understanding of this crucial binary protein interaction. Two new structures for the helicase-interacting domain of the bacterial primases from Escherichia coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus have recently been solved and both revealed a unique and surprising structural similarity to the amino-terminal domain of the helicase itself. In this minireview, the current data are discussed and important new structural and functional aspects of the helicase-primase interaction are highlighted. An attractive structural model with direct biological significance for the function of this complex and also for the development of new antibacterial compounds is examined.

Bacteriophage T4 Helicase Loader Protein gp59 Functions as Gatekeeper in Origin-dependent Replication in Vivo

Bacteriophage T4 initiates origin-dependent replication via an R-loop mechanism in vivo. During in vitro reactions, the phage-encoded gp59 stimulates loading of the replicative helicase, gp41, onto branched intermediates, including origin R-loops. However, although gp59 is essential for recombination-dependent replication from D-loops, it does not appear to be required for origin-dependent replication in vivo. In this study, we have analyzed the origin-replicative intermediates formed during infections that are deficient in gp59 and other phage replication proteins. During infections lacking gp59, the initial replication forks from two different T4 origins actively replicated both leading- and lagging-strands. However, the retrograde replication forks from both origins were abnormal in the gp59-deficient infections. The lagging-strand from the initial fork was elongated as a new leading-strand in the retrograde direction without lagging-strand synthesis, whereas in the wild-type, leading- and lagging-strand synthesis appeared to be coupled. These results imply that gp59 inhibits the polymerase holoenzyme in vivo until the helicase-primase (gp41-gp61) complex is loaded, and we thereby refer to gp59 as a gatekeeper. We also found that all origin-replicative intermediates were absent in infections deficient in the helicase gp41 or the single-strand-binding protein gp32, regardless of whether gp59 was present or absent. These results argue that replication from the origin in vivo is dependent on both the helicase and single-strand-binding protein and demonstrate that the strong replication defect of gene 41 and 32 single mutants is not caused by gp59 inhibition of the polymerase.

Interaction between the T4 Helicase Loading Protein (gp59) and the DNA Polymerase (gp43): Unlocking of the gp59−gp43−DNA Complex to Initiate Assembly of A Fully Functional Replisome

Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer and functional assays have been used to study the initiation and regulation of the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system. Previous work has demonstrated that a complex of the helicase loading protein (gp59) and the DNA polymerase (gp43) on forked DNA totally inhibits the polymerase and exonuclease activities of gp43 by a molecular locking mechanism (Xi, J., Zhuang, Z., Zhang, Z., Selzer, T., Spiering, M. M., Hammes, G. G., and Benkovic, S. J. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 2305-2318). We now show that this complex is "unlocked" by the addition of the helicase (gp41) with restoration of the DNA polymerase activity. Gp59 retains its ability to load the helicase while forming a gp59-gp43 complex at a DNA fork in the presence of the single-stranded DNA binding protein (gp32). Upon the addition of gp41 and MgATP, gp59 dissociates from the complex, and the DNA-bound gp41 is capable of recruiting the primase (gp61) to form a functional primosome and, subsequently, a fully active replisome. Functional assays of leading- and lagging-strand synthesis on an active replication fork show that the absence of gp59 has no effect on the coupling of leading- and lagging-strand synthesis or on the size of the Okazaki DNA fragments. We conclude that gp59 acts in a manner similar to the clamp loader to ensure proper assembly of the replisome and does not remain as a replisome component during active replication.

Maturation of Bacteriophage T4 Lagging Strand Fragments Depends on Interaction of T4 RNase H with T4 32 Protein Rather than the T4 Gene 45 Clamp

In the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system, T4 RNase H removes the RNA primers and some adjacent DNA before the lagging strand fragments are ligated. This 5'-nuclease has strong structural and functional similarity to the FEN1 nuclease family. We have shown previously that T4 32 protein binds DNA behind the nuclease and increases its processivity. Here we show that T4 RNase H with a C-terminal deletion (residues 278-305) retains its exonuclease activity but is no longer affected by 32 protein. T4 gene 45 replication clamp stimulates T4 RNase H on nicked or gapped substrates, where it can be loaded behind the nuclease, but does not increase its processivity. An N-terminal deletion (residues 2-10) of a conserved clamp interaction motif eliminates stimulation by the clamp. In the crystal structure of T4 RNase H, the binding sites for the clamp at the N terminus and for 32 protein at the C terminus are located close together, away from the catalytic site of the enzyme. By using mutant T4 RNase H with deletions in the binding site for either the clamp or 32 protein, we show that it is the interaction of T4 RNase H with 32 protein, rather than the clamp, that most affects the maturation of lagging strand fragments in the T4 replication system in vitro and T4 phage production in vivo.

The Disposition of Nascent Strands at Stalled Replication Forks Dictates the Pathway of Replisome Loading during Restart

Rescue of arrested and collapsed replication forks is essential for maintenance of genomic integrity. One system for origin of replication-independent loading of the DnaB replicative helicase and subsequent replisome reassembly requires the structure-specific recognition factor PriA and the assembly factors PriB and DnaT. Here, we provide biochemical evidence for an alternate system for DnaB loading that requires only PriC. Furthermore, the choice of which system is utilized during restart is dictated by the nature of the structure of the stalled replication fork. PriA-dependent reactions are most robust on fork structures with no gaps in the leading strand, such as is found at the junction of a D loop, while the PriC-dependent system preferentially utilizes fork structures with large gaps in the leading strand. These observations suggest that the type of initial damage on the DNA template and how the inactivated fork is processed ultimately influence the choice of enzymatic restart pathway.

Effects ofrecJ,recQ, andrecFORMutations on Recombination in Nuclease-DeficientrecB recDDouble Mutants ofEscherichia coli

The two main recombination pathways in Escherichia coli (RecBCD and RecF) have different recombination machineries that act independently in the initiation of recombination. Three essential enzymatic activities are required for early recombinational processing of double-stranded DNA ends and breaks: a helicase, a 5'-->3' exonuclease, and loading of RecA protein onto single-stranded DNA tails. The RecBCD enzyme performs all of these activities, whereas the recombination machinery of the RecF pathway consists of RecQ (helicase), RecJ (5'-->3' exonuclease), and RecFOR (RecA-single-stranded DNA filament formation). The recombination pathway operating in recB (nuclease-deficient) mutants is a hybrid because it includes elements of both the RecBCD and RecF recombination machineries. In this study, genetic analysis of recombination in a recB (nuclease-deficient) recD double mutant was performed. We show that conjugational recombination and DNA repair after UV and gamma irradiation in this mutant are highly dependent on recJ, partially dependent on recFOR, and independent of recQ. These results suggest that the recombination pathway operating in a nuclease-deficient recB recD double mutant is also a hybrid. We propose that the helicase and RecA loading activities belong to the RecBCD recombination machinery, while the RecJ-mediated 5'-->3' exonuclease is an element of the RecF recombination machinery.

Mechanistic Studies of the T4 DNA (gp41) Replication Helicase: Functional Interactions of the C-terminal Tails of the Helicase Subunits with the T4 (gp59) Helicase Loader Protein

We compare the activities of the wild-type (gp41WT) and mutant (gp41delta C20) forms of the bacteriophage T4 replication helicase. In the gp41delta C20 mutant the helicase subunits have been genetically truncated to remove the 20 residue C-terminal tail peptide domains present in the wild-type enzyme. Here, we examine the interactions of these helicase forms with the T4 gp59 helicase loader and the gp32 single-stranded DNA binding proteins, both of which are physically and functionally coupled with the helicase in the T4 DNA replication complex. We show that the wild-type and mutant forms of the helicase do not differ in their ability to assemble into dimers and hexamers, nor in their interactions with gp61 (the T4 primase). However they do differ in their gp59-stimulated unwinding activities and in their abilities to translocate along a ssDNA strand that has been coated with gp32. We demonstrate that functional coupling between gp59 and gp41 involves direct interactions between the C-terminal tail peptides of the helicase subunits and the loading protein, and measure the energetics and kinetics of these interactions. This work helps to define a gp41-gp59 assembly pathway that involves an initial interaction between the C-terminal tails of the helicases and the gp59 loader proteins, followed by a conformational change of the helicase subunits that exposes new interaction surfaces, which can then be trapped by the gp59 protein. Our results suggest that the gp41-gp59 complex is then poised to bind ssDNA portions of the replication fork. We suggest that one of the important functions of gp59 may be to aid in the exposure of the ssDNA binding sites of the helicase subunits, which are otherwise masked and regulated by interactions with the helicase carboxy-terminal tail peptides.

Functional interplay between the Bacillus subtilis DnaD and DnaB proteins essential for initiation and re‐initiation of DNA replication

Initiation and re-initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in bacteria rely on divergent multiprotein assemblies, which direct the functional delivery of the replicative helicase on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at specific sites. These two processes are triggered either at the single chromosomal origin oriC or at arrested forks by the conserved DnaA and PriA proteins respectively. In Bacillus subtilis, these two pathways further require the three essential proteins DnaB, DnaD and DnaI, restrictively encoded in Gram positive bacteria of low GC content. We have recently shown that DnaI and DnaB act as a pair of loaders of the DnaC replicative helicase. The role of DnaD appeared more enigmatic. It was previously shown to interact with DnaA and to display weak ssDNA binding activity. Here, we report that purified DnaD can interact physically with PriA and with DnaB. We show that the lethality of the temperature-sensitive dnaD23 mutant can be suppressed by different DnaB point mutants, which were found to be identical to the suppressors of priA null mutants. The DnaD23 protein displays lower ssDNA binding activity than DnaD. Conversely, the DnaB75 protein, the main dnaD23 suppressor, has gained affinity for ssDNA. Finally, we observed that this interplay between DnaD and DnaB is crucial for their concerted interaction with SSB-coated ssDNA, which is the expected substrate for the loading of the replicative helicase in vivo. Altogether, these results highlight the need for both DnaD and DnaB to interact individually and together with ssDNA during the early stages of initiation and re-initiation of chromosomal DNA replication. They also point at a main structural role of DnaD in the multiprotein assemblies built during these two essential processes.