Hec1 Tail Research Articles

Strain stiffening of Ndc80 complexes attached to microtubule plus ends

In the mitotic spindle, microtubules attach to chromosomes via kinetochores. The microtubule-binding Ndc80 complex is an integral part of kinetochores, and is essential for kinetochores to attach to microtubules and to transmit forces from dynamic microtubule ends to the chromosomes. The Ndc80 complex has a rod-like appearance with globular domains at its ends that are separated by a long coiled coil. Its mechanical properties are considered important for the dynamic interaction between kinetochores and microtubules. Here, we present a novel method that allows us to time trace the effective stiffness of Ndc80 complexes following shortening microtubule ends against applied force in optical trap experiments. Applying this method to wild-type Ndc80 and three variants (calponin homology (CH) domains mutated or Hec1 tail unphosphorylated, phosphorylated, or truncated), we reveal that each variant exhibits strain stiffening; i.e., the effective stiffness increases under tension that is built up by a depolymerizing microtubule. The strain stiffening relation is roughly linear and independent of the state of the microtubule. We introduce structure-based models that show that the strain stiffening can be traced back to the specific architecture of the Ndc80 complex with a characteristic flexible kink, to thermal fluctuations of the microtubule, and to the bending elasticity of flaring protofilaments, which exert force to move the Ndc80 complexes. Our model accounts for changes in the amount of load-bearing attachments at various force levels and reproduces the roughly linear strain stiffening behavior, highlighting the importance of force-dependent binding affinity.

The Hec1/Ndc80 tail domain is required for force generation at kinetochores, but is dispensable for kinetochore-microtubule attachment formation and Ska complex recruitment.

The conserved kinetochore-associated NDC80 complex (composed of Hec1/Ndc80, Nuf2, Spc24, and Spc25) has well-documented roles in mitosis including 1) connecting mitotic chromosomes to spindle microtubules to establish force-transducing kinetochore–microtubule attachments and 2) regulating the binding strength between kinetochores and microtubules such that correct attachments are stabilized and erroneous attachments are released. Although the NDC80 complex plays a central role in forming and regulating attachments to microtubules, additional factors support these processes as well, including the spindle and kinetochore-associated (Ska) complex. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that Ska complexes strengthen attachments by increasing the ability of NDC80 complexes to bind microtubules, especially to depolymerizing microtubule plus ends, but how this is accomplished remains unclear. Using cell-based and in vitro assays, we demonstrate that the Hec1 tail domain is dispensable for Ska complex recruitment to kinetochores and for generation of kinetochore–microtubule attachments in human cells. We further demonstrate that Hec1 tail phosphorylation regulates kinetochore–microtubule attachment stability independently of the Ska complex. Finally, we map the location of the Ska complex in cells to a region near the coiled-coil domain of the NDC80 complex and demonstrate that this region is required for Ska complex recruitment to the NDC80 complex-–microtubule interface.

Hec1/Ndc80 Tail Domain Function at the Kinetochore-Microtubule Interface.

Successful mitotic cell division is critically dependent on the formation of correct attachments between chromosomes and spindle microtubules. Microtubule attachments are mediated by kinetochores, which are large proteinaceous structures assembled on centromeric chromatin of mitotic chromosomes. These attachments must be sufficiently stable to transduce force; however, the strength of these attachments are also tightly regulated to ensure timely, error-free progression through mitosis. The highly conserved, kinetochore-associated NDC80 complex is a core component of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment machinery in eukaryotic cells. A small, disordered region within the Hec1 subunit of the NDC80 complex – the N-terminal “tail” domain – has been actively investigated during the last decade due to its roles in generating and regulating kinetochore-microtubule attachments. In this review, we discuss the role of the NDC80 complex, and specifically the Hec1 tail domain, at the kinetochore-microtubule interface, and how recent studies provide a more unified view of Hec1 tail domain function.

Aurora A kinase phosphorylates Hec1 to regulate metaphase kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Precise regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments is essential for successful chromosome segregation. Central to this regulation is Aurora B kinase, which phosphorylates kinetochore substrates to promote microtubule turnover. A critical target of Aurora B is the N-terminal "tail" domain of Hec1, which is a component of the NDC80 complex, a force-transducing link between kinetochores and microtubules. Although Aurora B is regarded as the "master regulator" of kinetochore-microtubule attachment, other mitotic kinases likely contribute to Hec1 phosphorylation. In this study, we demonstrate that Aurora A kinase regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics of metaphase chromosomes, and we identify Hec1 S69, a previously uncharacterized phosphorylation target site in the Hec1 tail, as a critical Aurora A substrate for this regulation. Additionally, we demonstrate that Aurora A kinase associates with inner centromere protein (INCENP) during mitosis and that INCENP is competent to drive accumulation of the kinase to the centromere region of mitotic chromosomes. These findings reveal that both Aurora A and B contribute to kinetochore-microtubule attachment dynamics, and they uncover an unexpected role for Aurora A in late mitosis.

Hec1 Tail Phosphorylation Differentially Regulates Mammalian Kinetochore Coupling to Polymerizing and Depolymerizing Microtubules

The kinetochore links chromosomes to dynamic spindle microtubules and drives both chromosome congression and segregation. To do so, the kinetochore must hold on to depolymerizing and polymerizing microtubules. At metaphase, one sister kinetochore couples to depolymerizing microtubules, pulling its sister along polymerizing microtubules [1, 2]. Distinct kinetochore-microtubule interfaces mediate these behaviors: active interfacestransduce microtubule depolymerization into mechanical work, and passive interfaces generate friction as the kinetochore moves along microtubules [3, 4]. Despite a growing understanding of the molecular components that mediate kinetochore binding [5-7], we do not know how kinetochores physically interact with polymerizing versus depolymerizing microtubule bundles, and whether they use the same mechanisms and regulation to do so. To address this question, we focus on the mechanical role of the essential load-bearing protein Hec1 [8-11] in mammalian cells. Hec1's affinity for microtubules is regulated by Aurora B phosphorylation on its N-terminal tail [12-15], but its role at the interface with polymerizing versus depolymerizing microtubules remains unclear. Here we use laser ablation to trigger cellular pulling on mutant kinetochores and decouple sisters invivo, and thereby separately probe Hec1's role on polymerizing versus depolymerizing microtubules. We show that Hec1 tail phosphorylation tunes friction along polymerizing microtubules and yet does not compromise the kinetochore's ability to grip depolymerizing microtubules. Together, the data suggest that kinetochore regulation has differential effects on engagement with growing and shrinking microtubules. Through this mechanism, the kinetochore can modulate its grip on microtubules over mitosis and yet retain its ability to couple to microtubules powering chromosome movement.

Multisite phosphorylation of the NDC80 complex gradually tunes its microtubule-binding affinity.

Microtubule (MT) attachment to kinetochores is vitally important for cell division, but how these interactions are controlled by phosphorylation is not well known. We used quantitative approaches in vitro combined with molecular dynamics simulations to examine phosphoregulation of the NDC80 complex, a core kinetochore component. We show that the outputs from multiple phosphorylation events on the unstructured tail of its Hec1 subunit are additively integrated to elicit gradual tuning of NDC80-MT binding both in vitro and in silico. Conformational plasticity of the Hec1 tail enables it to serve as a phosphorylation-controlled rheostat, providing a new paradigm for regulating the affinity of MT binders. We also show that cooperativity of NDC80 interactions is weak and is unaffected by NDC80 phosphorylation. This in vitro finding strongly supports our model that independent molecular binding events to MTs by individual NDC80 complexes, rather than their structured oligomers, regulate the dynamics and stability of kinetochore-MT attachments in dividing cells.

NDC80 Microtubule Binding but not Cooperativity Decreases Proportionally to the Number of Phosphorylated Residues and Independently of their Positions in NDC80 Tail

Proper regulation of dynamic interactions between microtubules and chromosomal kinetochores is vitally important for accurate cell division, but little is known about how such regulation is achieved. Here, we used single molecule and quantitative fluorescence microscopy approaches to dissect microtubule binding of the multisubunit NDC80 complex, a core kinetochore microtubule-binding component. Human GFP-labeled NDC80 proteins were designed with up to nine phospho-mimetic aspartates, all located in the N-terminal tail of Hec1 subunit in a different combinations. Previous studies have suggested that one set of these phospho-residues controls primarily the affinity of NDC80 binding to microtubule, while the other set regulates binding cooperativity. We provide evidence, however, that phosphorylation of Hec1 tail has little impact on the cooperativity of NDC80 binding. In contrast, the microtubule binding affinity, as estimated from the residency time and diffusion coefficient of single NDC80 complexes, is highly sensitive to Hec1 tail phosphorylation. The binding energy decreases linearly at about 0.3 kBT per added phosphoresidue regardless of its specific position in Hec1 tail. To gain insight into such unusual regulatory behavior we have carried out molecular dynamics simulations of the disordered Hec1 tail in the context of microtubule-bound NDC80 complexes. These theoretical simulations revealed multiple conformations of the Hec1 tail bound to microtubule. Interestingly, the contact area between Hec1 tail and microtubule decreases proportionally to the number but not the locations of phospho-mimetic mutations in Hec1 tail. We propose that the disordered nature of NDC80 tail renders its microtubule binding insensitive to the exact location of phosphorylated residue, thereby enabling the gradual tuning of kinetochore-microtubule binding affinity during mitosis.

A TPR domain–containing N-terminal module of MPS1 is required for its kinetochore localization by Aurora B

The mitotic checkpoint ensures correct chromosome segregation by delaying cell cycle progression until all kinetochores have attached to the mitotic spindle. In this paper, we show that the mitotic checkpoint kinase MPS1 contains an N-terminal localization module, organized in an N-terminal extension (NTE) and a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain, for which we have determined the crystal structure. Although the module was necessary for kinetochore localization of MPS1 and essential for the mitotic checkpoint, the predominant kinetochore binding activity resided within the NTE. MPS1 localization further required HEC1 and Aurora B activity. We show that MPS1 localization to kinetochores depended on the calponin homology domain of HEC1 but not on Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation of the HEC1 tail. Rather, the TPR domain was the critical mediator of Aurora B control over MPS1 localization, as its deletion rendered MPS1 localization insensitive to Aurora B inhibition. These data are consistent with a model in which Aurora B activity relieves a TPR-dependent inhibitory constraint on MPS1 localization.

Incremental Phosphorylation of a Dynamic Lawn of NDC80 Complexes Provides Graded Control of Kinetochore-Microtubule Affinity

The stability of kinetochore-microtubule (KMT) attachments is finely tuned to drive different mitotic processes. This regulation involves phosphorylation of NDC80 complex, a major component of the MT-binding interface at kinetochores. The fundamental question of how the number and stability of KMT attachments is regulated by NDC80 phosphorylation remains unanswered. The Hec1 subunit of the NDC80 complex has an unstructured “tail,” which is required for KMT attachment in vivo and contributes to the NDC80 complex-MT binding in vitro. This tail is an established target for Aurora kinases and has 9 mapped phosphorylation sites. To understand how phosphorylation of the Hec1 tail affects MT-binding characteristics of single NDC80 complexes we expressed and purified NDC80Bonsai complexes with different number of phospho-mimetic mutations in Hec1 tail. With TIRF microscopy we found that Hec1 tail phosphorylation leads to a graded increase in NDC80 diffusion and the shortening of its MT residency time, but cooperativity of NDC80-MT binding is only weakly affected by Hec1 tail phosphorylation. To understand physiological relevance of the phosphoregulation of NDC80 complexes we used computational approaches to model kinetochore-MT interface containing multiple NDC80 molecules. We show that the behavior of such interface strongly depends on the spatial organization of the NDC80 complexes. KMT interface that contained “repetitive sites” of NDC80 complexes greatly amplified the relatively small, phosphorylation-induced changes in the residency time of single NDC80. However, the KMT interface that contained a dynamic “lawn” of un-clustered and uncoordinated NDC80 complexes exhibited a graded response to phosphorylation and produced an excellent fit to our data with cells in prometaphase and metaphase. We conclude that incremental phosphorylation of NDC80 complexes drives the graded regulation of kinetochore-microtubule affinity during mitotic progression.

The Ndc80 complex uses a tripartite attachment point to couple microtubule depolymerization to chromosome movement

In kinetochores, the Ndc80 complex couples the energy in a depolymerizing microtubule to perform the work of moving chromosomes. The complex directly binds microtubules using an unstructured, positively charged N-terminal tail located on Hec1/Ndc80. Hec1/Ndc80 also contains a calponin homology domain (CHD) that increases its affinity for microtubules in vitro, yet whether it is required in cells and how the tail and CHD work together are critical unanswered questions. Human kinetochores containing Hec1/Ndc80 with point mutations in the CHD fail to align chromosomes or form productive microtubule attachments. Kinetochore architecture and spindle checkpoint protein recruitment are unaffected in these mutants, and the loss of CHD function cannot be rescued by removing Aurora B sites from the tail. The interaction between the Hec1/Ndc80 CHD and a microtubule is facilitated by positively charged amino acids on two separate regions of the CHD, and both are required for kinetochores to make stable attachments to microtubules. Chromosome congression in cells also requires positive charge on the Hec1 tail to facilitate microtubule contact. In vitro binding data suggest that charge on the tail regulates attachment by directly increasing microtubule affinity as well as driving cooperative binding of the CHD. These data argue that in vertebrates there is a tripartite attachment point facilitating the interaction between Hec1/Ndc80 and microtubules. We discuss how such a complex microtubule-binding interface may facilitate the coupling of depolymerization to chromosome movement.

The NDC80 complex proteins Nuf2 and Hec1 make distinct contributions to kinetochore–microtubule attachment in mitosis

Successful mitosis requires that kinetochores stably attach to the plus ends of spindle microtubules. Central to generating these attachments is the NDC80 complex, made of the four proteins Spc24, Spc25, Nuf2, and Hec1/Ndc80. Structural studies have revealed that portions of both Hec1 and Nuf2 N termini fold into calponin homology (CH) domains, which are known to mediate microtubule binding in certain proteins. Hec1 also contains a basic, positively charged stretch of amino acids that precedes its CH domain, referred to as the "tail." Here, using a gene silence and rescue approach in HeLa cells, we show that the CH domain of Hec1, the CH domain of Nuf2, and the Hec1 tail each contributes to kinetochore-microtubule attachment in distinct ways. The most severe defects in kinetochore-microtubule attachment were observed in cells rescued with a Hec1 CH domain mutant, followed by those rescued with a Hec1 tail domain mutant. Cells rescued with Nuf2 CH domain mutants, however, generated stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments but failed to generate wild-type interkinetochore tension and failed to enter anaphase in a timely manner. These data suggest that the CH and tail domains of Hec1 generate essential contacts between kinetochores and microtubules in cells, whereas the Nuf2 CH domain does not.

Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Relies on the Disordered N-Terminal Tail Domain of Hec1

Accurate chromosome segregation is dependent upon stable attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules during mitosis. A long-standing question is how kinetochores maintain stable attachment to the plus ends of dynamic microtubules that are continually growing and shortening. The Ndc80 complex is essential for persistent end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachment in cells [1, 2], but how the Ndc80 complex forms functional microtubule-binding sites remains unknown. We show that the 80 amino acid N-terminal unstructured "tail" of Hec1 is required for generating stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. PtK1 cells depleted of endogenous Hec1 and rescued with Hec1-GFP fusion proteins deleted of the entire N terminus or the disordered N-terminal 80 amino acid tail domain fail to generate stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mutation of nine amino acids within the Hec1 tail to reduce its positive charge also abolishes stable attachment. Furthermore, the mitotic checkpoint remains functional after deletion of the N-terminal 80 amino acid tail, but not after deletion of the N-terminal 207 amino acid region containing both the tail domain and a calponin homology (CH) domain. These results demonstrate that kinetochore-microtubule binding is dependent on electrostatic interactions mediated through the disordered N-terminal 80 amino acid tail domain and mitotic-checkpoint function is dependent on the CH domain of Hec1.

Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1

Kinetochore attachments to microtubules are tight enough to move chromosomes, yet the microtubules' plus ends must remain dynamic and reposition within the attachment pocket during depolymerization-coupled movement. Kinetochores are unable to bind microtubules after any of the four subunits of the Ndc80 complex are knocked down [2, 4]; however, because the Ndc80 complex has important structural roles [1-3], it is unclear whether it directly mediates kinetochore-microtubule attachments. The Ndc80(Hec1) subunit (Hec1) has a microtubule-binding site composed of both an unstructured N-terminal tail and a calponin homology domain [5-7]. Here, we show that, surprisingly, the N-terminal tail is sufficient for microtubule-binding affinity in vitro. The interaction is salt sensitive, and the positively charged Hec1 tail cannot bind microtubules lacking negatively charged tails. We have replaced the endogenous Hec1 subunit with a mutant lacking the N-terminal tail. These cells assemble kinetochores properly but are unable to congress chromosomes, generate tension across sister kinetochores, or establish cold-stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Our data argue that the highest affinity interactions between kinetochores and microtubules are ionic attractions between two unstructured domains. We discuss the importance of this finding for models of repositioning of microtubules in the kinetochore during depolymerization.