This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation. A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment. Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, P<0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, P=0.039). ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.
Read full abstract