Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Research Articles

Intentional weight loss in overweight and obese patients with heart failure: A systematic review.

Approximately 30-49% of heart failure (HF) patients are living with obesity. The recommended body mass index (BMI) for the general population is 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. The obesity paradox suggests that HF patients with obesity (HFpwO) have a better prognosis compared to normal BMI. Guideline recommendations on ideal BMI for HFpwO are limited. This systematic review aims to examine the evidence base for intentional weight loss in HFpwO on the following parameters: mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, quality of life (QOL), effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events. A total of 22 studies were identified: lifestyle intervention (n = 9), pharmacotherapy (n = 3), bariatric surgery (n = 10). Mortality and hospitalization, symptoms, QOL, and LVEF were reported in 8, 15 and 14 studies, respectively. All studies had moderate to high risk of bias except one randomized controlled trial (RCT) which evaluated semaglutide in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Semaglutide resulted in weight loss with improvement in QOL. Lifestyle intervention led to weight loss, minimal adverse events, and improvement in symptoms in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF patients. In six observational studies, bariatric surgery in HFrEF patients achieved weight loss and improvement in LVEF safely in most patients but some patients developed worsening HF perioperatively. There is a need for high-quality adequately powered RCTs on intentional weight loss in HFpwO with survival and hospitalization outcomes. All forms of weight loss intervention studied in this review were likely to result in significant weight loss, improved symptoms and QOL. Careful monitoring is required due to an increase in certain adverse events.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Hypertensive Medications in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hypertension (HTN) is a co-morbidity that is commonly associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it remains unclear whether treatment of hypertension in HFpEF patients is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the association of anti-hypertensive medical therapy with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF. We performed a database search for studies reporting on the association of anti-hypertensive medications with cardiovascular outcomes and safety endpoints in patients with HFpEF. The databases searched include OVID Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints include cardiovascular (CV) mortality, worsening heart failure (HF), CV hospitalization, composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), hyperkalemia, worsening renal function, and hypotension. A total of 12 studies with 14062 HFpEF participants (7010 treated with medical therapy versus 7052 treated with placebo) met inclusion criteria. Use of anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower all-cause mortality, CV mortality or CV hospitalization compared to treatment with placebo (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.77-1.35; p=0.9, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.06; p=0.19, OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12; p=0.83, OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.03; p=0.11). Anti-hypertensive medications were not associated with lower risk of subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.07-3.73; p=0.5). Use of anti-hypertensive medications was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of MACE (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98; p=0.02). While treatment with anti-hypertensive medications was not associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality, their use may be associated with reduce risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFpEF regardless of whether they have HTN. Additional high quality studies are required to clarify this association and determine the effect based on specific classes of medications.

Empagliflozin inhibits increased Na influx in atrial cardiomyocytes of patients with HFpEF.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Importantly, atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation is frequently observed in HFpEF. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have recently been shown to improve clinical outcomes in HFpEF, and post-hoc analyses suggest atrial antiarrhythmic effects. We tested if isolated human atrial cardiomyocytes from patients with HFpEF exhibit an increased Na influx, which is known to cause atrial arrhythmias, and if that is responsive to treatment with the SGTL2i empagliflozin. Cardiomyocytes were isolated from atrial biopsies of 124 patients (82 with HFpEF) undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Na influx was measured with the Na-dye Asante Natrium Green-2 AM (ANG-2). Compared to patients without heart failure (NF), Na influx was doubled in HFpEF patients (NF vs HFpEF: 0.21±0.02 vs 0.38±0.04 mmol/L/min (N=7 vs 18); p=0.0078). Moreover, late INa (measured via whole-cell patch clamp) was significantly increased in HFpEF compared to NF. Western blot and HDAC4 pulldown assay indicated a significant increase in CaMKII expression, CaMKII autophosphorylation, CaMKII activity, and CaMKII-dependent NaV1.5 phosphorylation in HFpEF compared to NF, whereas NaV1.5 protein and mRNA abundance remained unchanged. Consistently, increased Na influx was significantly reduced by treatment with the CaMKII inhibitor autocamtide-2 related inhibitory peptide (AIP), late INa inhibitor tetrodotoxin (TTX) but also with NHE1 inhibitor cariporide. Importantly, empagliflozin abolished both increased Na influx and late INa in HFpEF. Multivariate linear regression analysis, adjusting for important clinical confounders, revealed HFpEF to be an independent predictor for changes in Na handling in atrial cardiomyocytes. We show for the first time increased Na influx in human atrial cardiomyocytes from HFpEF patients, partly due to increased late INa and enhanced NHE1-mediated Na influx. Empagliflozin inhibits Na influx and late INa, which could contribute to antiarrhythmic effects in patients with HFpEF.

Clinical characteristics and atrial fibrillation management in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist. AF management in HF is currently changing with increasing role of rhythm control. Data about clinical characteristics and AF management in hospitalized patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are lacking. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical characteristics and AF management in hospitalized patients with NVAF and HFrEF and compare them to those of NVAF and HFpEF. Methods Consecutive NVAF patients hospitalized with HF decompensation between January 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: HFrEF and HFpEF (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%). Clinical characteristics and AF treatment strategy in both groups were studied and compared. Numerical data are expressed as median (interquartile range). P<0.05 was considered significant. Results In a total of 388 AF-HF patients (age 73.5 years [66-82], 59.3% males), 147 (37.9%) had reduced ejection fraction. Patients with HFrEF compared to those with HFpEF were younger (69.3 vs 74.7 years; P < 0.001), more often male and with a higher rate of NYHA classes III-IV (73.9% vs 63.5%; P < 0.05), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level (2658.5 pg/ml vs 1799.1 pg/ml; p<0.001), sum of B-lines by lung ultrasound (35.2 vs 28.9; P<0.05) and prevalence of non-paroxysmal forms of AF (70.4% vs 50.4%; p < 0.05). Patients with HFrEF had a higher burden of coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease and prior stroke (31.7% vs 19.2%, 83.9% vs 69.0, 18.5% vs 9.7%, respectively; p< 0.05 for all) than HFpEF patients. Patients with HFpEF were more likely than those with HFrEF to have diabetes mellitus (25.9% vs 37.1%; p< 0.05) The subgroup of patients with HFrEF compared to those with HFpEF had higher bleeding risk (HAS-BLED ≥3 in 32.1% vs 20.4%, P<0.05) due to more frequent abnormal renal/liver function, concomitant antithrombotic treatment/alcohol, prior stroke (24.7% vs 10.6%, 28.4% vs 16.8%, 18.5% vs 9.7%, respectively; P<0.05 for all) but lower thromboembolic risk according to CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (4.0 vs 4.4; p < 0.05). Oral anticoagulants (OAC) were administered in 88% of patients on discharge. Patterns of anticoagulation administration didn’t differ between the two groups. Patients with HFrEF were less likely to receive first-line rhythm control for AF compared to HFpEF patients (36.1% vs 68.1%; p<0.05). Conclusion Hospitalized patients with NVAF and HFrEF compared to those with HFpEF were younger, with greater severity of HF, higher burden of comorbidities and bleeding risk and slightly lower thromboembolic risk. Despite different clinical characteristics, OAC administration patterns were similar and OAC prescription rate was not optimal in both groups. There is a need for improvement of guideline adherence to first-line rhythm control strategy in AF and HFrEF.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of an ejection fraction adjusted for myocardial remodeling

IntroductionEjection fraction (EF) is widely used to evaluate heart function during heart failure (HF) due to its simplicity compared but it may misrepresent cardiac function during ventricular hypertrophy, especially in heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF). To resolve this shortcoming, we evaluate a correction factor to EF, which is equivalent to computing EF at the mid-wall layer (without the need for mid-layer identification) rather than at the endocardial surface, and thus better complements other complex metrics.MethodThe retrospective cohort data was studied, consisting of 2,752 individuals (56.5% male, age 69.3 ± 16.4 years) admitted with a request of a troponin test and undergoing echocardiography as part of their clinical assessment across three centres. Cox-proportional regression models were constructed to compare the adjusted EF (EFa) to EF in evaluating risk of heart failure admissions.ResultComparing HFpEF patients to non-HF cases, there was no significant difference in EF (62.3 ± 7.6% vs. 64.2 ± 6.2%, p = 0.79), but there was a significant difference in EFa (56.6 ± 6.4% vs. 61.8 ± 9.9%, p = 0.0007). Both low EF and low EFa were associated with a high HF readmission risk. However, in the cohort with a normal EF (EF ≥ 50%), models using EFa were significantly more associative with HF readmissions within 3 years, where the leave one out cross validation ROC analysis showed a 18.6% reduction in errors, and Net Classification Index (NRI) analysis showed that risk increment classification of events increased by 12.2%, while risk decrement classification of non-events decreased by 16.6%.ConclusionEFa is associated with HF readmission in patients with a normal EF.

Machine learning in heart failure diagnosis, prediction and prognosis: Review

Globally, cardiovascular diseases take the lives of over 17 million people each year, mostly through myocardial infarction, or MI, and heart failure. This comprehensive literature review examines various aspects related to the diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis of heart failure (HF) in the context of machine learning (ML). The review covers an array of topics, including the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and the identification of high-risk patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The prediction of mortality in different heart failure populations using different ML approaches is explored, encompassing patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), and HFpEF patients using biomarkers and gene expression. The review also delves into the prediction of mortality and hospitalization rates in heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) using ML methods. The findings highlight the significance of a multidimensional approach that encompasses clinical evaluation, laboratory assessments, and comprehensive research to improve our understanding and management of heart failure. Promising predictive models incorporating biomarkers, gene expression, and consideration of epigenetics demonstrate potential in estimating mortality and identifying high-risk HFpEF patients. This literature review serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals seeking a comprehensive and updated understanding of the role of machine learning diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis of heart failure across different subtypes and patient populations.

Beta blockers are associated with lower all-cause mortality among HFpEF patients.

The evidence regarding beta blocker (BB) benefit in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains inconclusive, leading to consideration of BB withdrawal in this population. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the association of BB on all-cause mortality in HFpEF patients. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of 20,206 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50% who were hospitalized with decompensated HF between January 2011 and March 2020. Survival is reported at 30days, 1year, and 3years. A secondary analysis comparing mortality for patients on BB with additional indications including hypertension (HTN), coronary artery disease (CAD), and atrial fibrillation (AF) was completed. Mortality was compared between patients on BB and additional therapies of spironolactone or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs). BB showed lower all-cause mortality at 30days, 1year, and 3years (p < 0.0001). This association with lower all-cause mortality was validated by a supplementary propensity score-matched analysis. At 3years, there was significant mortality reduction with addition of BB to either spironolactone (p = 0.0359) or ACEi/ARBs (p < 0.0001). In a large single-center retrospective registry, BB use was associated with lower mortality in HFpEF patients with a recent decompensated HF hospitalization. The mortality benefit persisted in those treated with spironolactone or ACEi/ARBs, and in those with AF. This provocative data further highlights the uncertainty of the benefit of BB use in this cohort and calls for re-consideration of BB withdrawal, especially in those tolerating it well, without conclusive, large, and randomized trials showing lack of benefit or harm.

Evaluation of renal sodium handling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A pilot study.

The pathophysiology behind sodium retention in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that patients with HFpEF have impaired natriuresis and diuresis in response to volume expansion and diuretic challenge, which is associated with renal hypo-responsiveness to endogenous natriuretic peptides. Nine HFpEF patients and five controls received saline infusion (0.25 mL/kg/min for 60 min) followed by intravenous furosemide (20 mg or home dose) 2 h after the infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline, 2 h after saline infusion, and 2 h after furosemide administration; urinary volumes were recorded. The urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (ucGMP)/plasma B-type NP (BNP) ratio was calculated as a measure of renal response to endogenous BNP. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the groups. Compared to controls, HFpEF patients had reduced urine output (2480 vs.3541 mL; p = 0.028), lower urinary sodium excretion over 2 h after saline infusion (the percentage of infused sodium excreted 12% vs. 47%; p = 0.003), and a lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratio (0.7 vs. 7.3 (pmol/mL)/(mg/dL)/(pg/mL); p = 0.014). Patients with HFpEF had impaired natriuretic response to intravenous saline and furosemide administration and lower baseline ucGMP/plasma BNP ratios indicating renal hypo-responsiveness to NPs.

Efficacy and safety of semaglutide in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and obesity.

Semaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown promise in weight management and cardiovascular outcomes in other populations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of semaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction(HFpEF) patients with obesity. A retrospective study analyzed 318 patients with HFpEF, of which 104 received semaglutide and 214 received placebo. Primary endpoints included evaluating changes in exercise capacity and weight management. Semaglutide treatment led to significant improvements in the primary endpoints. Patients in the semaglutide group demonstrated substantial enhancements in exercise capacity, as measured by the 6-min walk distance, compared to the placebo group (mean difference 15.1 meters, 95% CI 5.8 to 24.4, p = 0.002). Additionally, semaglutide resulted in substantial weight loss compared to placebo (mean difference -2.9%, 95% CI -4.1--1.7, p = 0.001). Several secondary endpoints, including reductions in C-reactive protein levels and improvements in other clinical parameters, further supported the efficacy of semaglutide. Adverse events were generally well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. Semaglutide demonstrated significant clinical benefits in HFpEF patients with obesity, as evidenced by improved symptoms, physical function, and weight reduction.

New Mechanisms to Prevent Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonism (GLP-1 RA) in Metabolic Syndrome and in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review.

This review examines the impact of obesity on the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and focuses on novel mechanisms for HFpEF prevention using a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonism (GLP-1 RA). Obesity can lead to HFpEF through various mechanisms, including low-grade systemic inflammation, adipocyte dysfunction, accumulation of visceral adipose tissue, and increased pericardial/epicardial adipose tissue (contributing to an increase in myocardial fat content and interstitial fibrosis). Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone that is released from the enteroendocrine L-cells in the gut. GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by stimulating insulin synthesis, suppressing islet α-cell function, and promoting the proliferation and differentiation of β-cells. GLP-1 regulates gastric emptying and appetite, and GLP-1 RA is currently indicated for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and metabolic syndrome (MS). Recent evidence indicates that GLP-1 RA may play a significant role in preventing HFpEF in patients with obesity, MS, or obese T2D. This effect may be due to activating cardioprotective mechanisms (the endogenous counter-regulatory renin angiotensin system and the AMPK/mTOR pathway) and by inhibiting deleterious remodeling mechanisms (the PKA/RhoA/ROCK pathway, aldosterone levels, and microinflammation). However, there is still a need for further research to validate the impact of these mechanisms on humans.

Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the AMY score.

Transthyretin 'wild-type' amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM) is a differential diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The clinical work-up for ATTRwt-CM is challenging. Considering a combination of clinical variables specific for ATTRwt-CM might aid in identifying patients at risk. Sixty patients (78±6years, 8% female) were diagnosed with ATTRwt-CM by endomyocardial biopsy. Preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >45%) was present in 41 of the patients. Those were 1:1 propensity score age- and sex-matched to a cohort of patients with HFpEF. ATTRwt-CM patients had less obesity (P=0.01) and higher septal thickness (IVSd, P<0.01) as well as more diastolic dysfunction (E/e', P<0.01). On multivariable regression IVSd>14mm, E/e'>14 and absence of obesity (P>0.01 for all) were identified as predictors for ATTRwt-CM. A weighted point-based score was derived with IVSd>14mm=1 point; absence of obesity=2 points; and E/e'>14=3 points. Area under the curve (AUC) for the summation score was 0.91 (0.84-0.97, P<0.01) and a score of more than 3 points predicted ATTRwt-CM with good sensitivity (78%) and specificity (90%). The score was validated in an external cohort of 142 patients with ATTRwt-CM and 419 HFpEF patients showing sufficient accuracy (AUC 0.91, 0.88-0.94, P<0.01). A value greater than 3 points demonstrated a high sensitivity (93%) and a negative predictive value of 97%. A score based on basic clinical and echocardiographic features helps to distinguish ATTRwt-CM from typical HFpEF. This could facilitate the diagnostic work-up for these patients and enable earlier disease screening on a large scale.

Applicability of H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF Scores in Chinese Patients Suffering From Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Complicated With Atrial Fibrillation

Objective To analyze the diagnostic values of H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HFpEF complicated with atrial fibrillation (HFpEF-AF) in Chinese patients and explore the related factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted.A total of 835 consecutive HFpEF patients treated in the Department of Geriatric Cardiology,the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from 2009 to 2020 were selected and assigned to a HFpEF-AF group (n=267) and a HFpEF group (n=568) according to the presence of AF or not.HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores were used for retrospective diagnosis and the diagnostic consistency of the two scores was assessed.One hundred and thirty-six healthy volunteers with age and sex matching the patients during the same period were selected as healthy controls.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established for H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores in diagnosing HFpEF-AF and HFpEF,on the basis of which the diagnostic performance of the two scores was evaluated. Results There was no difference in the HFA-PEFF score between the two groups (P=0.070).However,the HFpEF-AF group had higher mean H2FPEF score and higher proportion of patients with the score no less than 6 than the HFpEF group (P<0.001).According to the ROC curves,HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores demonstrated high performance in diagnosing all HFpEF patients,with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.892 and 0.922 and the optimal cut-offs of 4 and 4,respectively.The HFA-PEFF score showed similar performance in diagnosing HFpEF and HFpEF-AF,with the AUC of 0.899 and 0.911,respectively.The H2FPEF score had higher performance in diagnosing HFpEF-AF (AUC of approximately 1.000) and low performance in diagnosing HFpEF (AUC of 0.885). Conclusions The HFA-PEFF score is applicable in the diagnosis of both HFpEF and HFpEF-AF.The H2FPEF score may underestimate HFpEF in Chinese patients,and its applicability in the Chinese patients with HFpEF alone remains to be investigated.

A Murine Model of Hyperlipidemia-Induced Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) driven by lipotoxicity is incompletely understood. Given the urgent need for animal models that accurately mimic cardio-metabolic HFpEF, a hyperlipidemia-induced murine model was developed by reverse engineering phenotypes seen in HFpEF patients. This model aimed to investigate HFpEF, focusing on the interplay between lipotoxicity and metabolic syndrome. Hyperlipidemia was induced in wild-type (WT) mice on a 129J strain background through bi-weekly intraperitoneal injections of poloxamer-407 (P-407), a block co-polymer that blocks lipoprotein lipase, combined with a single intravenous injection of adeno-associated virus 9-cardiac troponin T-low-density lipoprotein receptor (AAV9-cTnT-LDLR). Extensive assessments were conducted between 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment, including echocardiography, blood pressure recording, whole-body plethysmography, echocardiography (ECG) telemetry, activity wheel monitoring (AWM), and biochemical and histological analyses. The LDLR/P-407 mice exhibited distinctive features at four weeks, including diastolic dysfunction, preserved ejection fraction, and increased left ventricular wall thickness. Notably, blood pressure and renal function remained within normal ranges. Additionally, ECG and AWM revealed heart blocks and reduced activity, respectively. Diastolic function deteriorated at eight weeks, accompanied by a significant decline in respiratory rates. Further investigation into the double treatment model revealed elevated fibrosis, wet/dry lung ratios, and heart weight/body weight ratios. The LDLR/P-407 mice exhibited xanthelasmas, ascites, and cardiac ischemia. Interestingly, sudden deaths occurred between 6 and 12 weeks post-treatment. The murine HFpEF model offers a valuable and promising experimental resource for elucidating the intricacies of metabolic syndrome contributing to diastolic dysfunction within the context of lipotoxicity-mediated HFpEF.

Prognostic value of measurement of myocardial extracellular volume using dual-energy CT in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Dual-energy CT (DECT) can noninvasively assess myocardial fibrosis by quantification of extracellular volume (ECV) fraction. This study evaluated the association between ECV measured by DECT and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. 125 hospitalized HFpEF patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. ECV was measured using DECT with late iodine enhancement. The composite endpoint was defined as HFpEF hospitalization and all-cause mortality during the follow-up. During the median follow-up of 10.4 months, 34 patients (27.20%) experienced the composite outcomes, including 5 deaths; and 29 HFpEF hospitalizations. The higher DECT-ECV group had higher rates of composite outcomes than the low ECV group (log-rank X2 = 6.818, P = 0.033). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the ECV (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.30, P = 0.001) and NT-pro BNP (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.16–6.88, P = 0.022) were independent risk factors for the adverse outcomes. Myocardial ECV measured using DECT was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Retinal Vascular Changes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Background: Systemic microvascular regression and dysfunction are considered important underlying mechanisms in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but retinal changes are unknown. Methods: This prospective study aimed to investigate whether retinal microvascular and structural parameters assessed using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) differ between patients with HFpEF and control individuals (i.e., capillary vessel density, thickness of retina layers). We also aimed to assess the associations of retinal parameters with clinical and echocardiographic parameters in HFpEF. HFpEF patients, but not controls, underwent echocardiography. Macula-centered 6 × 6 mm volume scans were computed of both eyes. Results: Twenty-two HFpEF patients and 24 controls without known HFpEF were evaluated, with an age of 74 [68-80] vs. 68 [58-77] years (p = 0.027), and 73% vs. 42% females (p = 0.034), respectively. HFpEF patients showed vascular degeneration compared to controls, depicted by lower macular vessel density (p < 0.001) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (p = 0.025), and a trend towards lower total retinal volume (p = 0.050) on OCT-A. In HFpEF, a lower total retinal volume was associated with markers of diastolic dysfunction (septal e', septal and average E/e': R2 = 0.38, 0.36, 0.25, respectively; all p < 0.05), even after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, or atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: Patients with HFpEF showed clear levels of retinal vascular changes compared to control individuals, and retinal alterations appeared to be associated with markers of more severe diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF. OCT-A may therefore be a promising technique for monitoring systemic microvascular regression and cardiac diastolic dysfunction.

Impact of heart rate changes during hospitalization on outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The benefits of lowering heart rate (HR) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients are still a matter of debate. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between changes in HR during hospitalization and cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause death in hospitalized HFpEF patients. Hospitalized HF patients between January 2017 and December 2021 were consecutively enrolled in a national, multicentred, and prospective registry database, the China Cardiovascular Association Database-HF Center Registry. HF patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥50% were defined as HFpEF patients. The study analysed admission/discharge HR, change in HR during hospitalization (∆HR), and ∆HR ratio (∆HR/admission HR). The patients were categorized into three groups: no HR dropping group (ΔHR ratio>0.0%), moderate HR dropping group (-15%<ΔHR ratio≤0.0%), and excessive HR dropping group (ΔHR ratio≤-15%). All patients were followed up for 12months. The primary endpoint was CV events (CV death or HF rehospitalization). The secondary endpoint was all-cause death. A total of 19510 HFpEF patients (9750 males, mean age 71.9±12.2years) were included, with 4575 in the no HR dropping group, 8434 in the moderate HR dropping group, and 6501 in the excessive HR dropping group. Excessive HR dropping during hospitalization was significantly associated with an increased risk of CV events (17.1%) compared with the no HR dropping group (14.5%, P<0.001) or the moderate HR dropping group (14.0%, P<0.001), although all-cause mortality was similar among the three groups. After adjusting for multiple confounding factors, excessive HR dropping remained an independent predictor of increased CV event risk [hazard ratio 1.197, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.078-1.328]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of excessive HR dropping on increased CV event risk remained in the subgroups of older age, New York Heart Association class IV, ischaemic HF, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, absence of chronic kidney disease, and use of beta-blockers or ivabradine. Independent determinants associated with excessive HR dropping during admission included use of beta-blockers [odds ratio (OR) 1.683, 95% CI 1.558-1.819], lower discharge diastolic blood pressure (OR 0.988, 95% CI 0.985-0.991), no pacemaker (OR 0.501, 95% CI 0.416-0.603), coexisting atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (OR 1.327, 95% CI 1.218-1.445), and use of digoxin (OR 1.340, 95% CI 1.213-1.480). In hospitalized HFpEF patients, excessive HR dropping during hospitalization is associated with an increased risk of CV death or HF rehospitalization. These findings highlight the importance of HR monitoring and avoiding excessively slowing down HR in hospitalized HFpEF patients to reduce the risk of CV events.

HBI-8000 improves heart failure with preserved ejection fraction via the TGF-β1/MAPK signalling pathway.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for approximately 50% of total heart failure patients and is characterized by peripheral circulation, cardiac remodelling and comorbidities (such as advanced age, obesity, hypertension and diabetes) with limited treatment options. Chidamide (HBI-8000) is a domestically produced benzamide-based histone deacetylase isoform-selective inhibitor used for the treatment of relapsed refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Based on our invivo studies, we propose that HBI-8000 exerts its therapeutic effects by inhibiting myocardial fibrosis and myocardial hypertrophy in HFpEF patients. At the cellular level, we found that HBI-8000 inhibits AngII-induced proliferation and activation of CFs and downregulates the expression of fibrosis-related factors. In addition, we observed that the HFpEF group and AngII stimulation significantly increased the expression of TGF-β1 as well as phosphorylated p38MAPK, JNK and ERK, whereas the expression of the above factors was significantly reduced after HBI-8000 treatment. Activation of the TGF-β1/MAPK pathway promotes the development of fibrotic remodelling, and pretreatment with SB203580 (p38MAPK inhibitor) reverses this pathological change. In conclusion, our data suggest that HBI-8000 inhibits fibrosis by modulating the TGF-β1/MAPK pathway thereby improving HFpEF. Therefore, HBI-8000 may become a new hope for the treatment of HFpEF patients.

Dapagliflozin versus sacubitril-valsartan for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (CVD). Both dapagliflozin and sacubitril-valsartan have recently shown convincing reductions in the combined risk of CVD and HF hospitalizations in patients with HF and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or HFpEF. We aimed to investigate the cost-per-outcome implications of dapagliflozin vs sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of HFmrEF or HFpEF patients. We compared the annualized cost needed to treat (CNT) to prevent the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD with dapagliflozin or sacubitril-valsartan. The CNT was estimated by multiplying the annualized number needed to treat (aNNT) by the annual cost of therapy. The aNNT was calculated based on data collected from the DELIVER trial for dapagliflozin and a pooled analysis of the PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF trials for sacubitril-valsartan. Costs were based on 2022 US prices. Scenario analyses were performed to attenuate the differences in the studies' populations. The aNNT with dapagliflozin in DELIVER was 30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21-62) versus 44 (95% CI: 25-311) with sacubitril-valsartan in a pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF, with an annual cost of $4,951 and $5,576, respectively. The corresponding CNTs were $148,547.13 (95% CI: $103,982.99-$306,997.39) for dapagliflozin and $245,346.77 (95% CI: $139,401.58-1,734,155.60) for sacubitril-valsartan for preventing the composite outcome of CVD and HF hospitalizations. The CNT for preventing all-cause mortality was lower for dapagliflozin than sacubitril-valsartan $1,128,958.15 [CI: $401,077.24-∞] vs $2,185,816.71 [CI: $607,790.87-∞]. Dapagliflozin provides a better monetary value than sacubitril-valsartan in preventing the composite outcome of total HF hospitalizations and CVD among patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF.

Identification of molecular signatures in epicardial adipose tissue in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

The molecular signatures in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) that contribute to the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are poorly characterized. In this study, we sought to elucidate molecular signatures including genetic transcripts and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in EAT that might modulate HFpEF development. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed to identify differentially expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs in EAT samples from patients with HFpEF (n=5) and without HF (control, n=5) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. The sequencing results were validated using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Bioinformatics analysis (Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) of differentially expressed RNAs was performed to predict enriched functions. HFpEF patients had higher EAT thickness and NT-proBNP levels than the control group. A total of 64471 transcripts were detected including 35395 protein-coding sequences, corresponding to 16854 genes in EAT. RNA-seq identified a total of 741 dysregulated mRNA transcripts (394 up-regulated and 347 down-regulated) and 334 differentially expressed lncRNA transcripts (222 up-regulated and 112 down-regulated) in the HFpEF group compared with the control group (P<0.05). qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that two lncRNAs ENST00000561775 (P=0.0194) and ENST00000519093 (P=0.027) and an mRNA POSTN (P=0.003) were differentially expressed. Functional enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed mRNAs suggested their potential roles in immune response involving cytokine interaction and chemokine signalling. We are the first group to report on the lncRNA and mRNA landscape in EAT in HFpEF patients. Our study suggests the possible role of lncRNAs in EAT.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, erythrocyte, and platelet in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), anaemia and low platelets have been associated with worse clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. We investigated the relationship between the combination of these three components and clinical outcome in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We examined the data of 1021 patients with HFpEF hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, a prospective, multicenter observational study. The enrolled patients were classified into four groups by an LEP (LDL-C, Erythrocyte, and Platelet) score of 0 to 3 points, with 1 point each for LDL-C, erythrocyte and platelet values less than the cut-off values as calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The endpoint, a composite of all-cause death and HF readmission, was evaluated among the four groups. Median follow-up duration was 579 [300, 978] days. Risk of the composite endpoint significantly differed among the four groups (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the groups with an LEP score of 2 had higher risk of the composite endpoint than those with an LEP score of 0 or 1 (P<0.001, and P=0.013, respectively), while those with an LEP score of 3 had higher risk than those with an LEP score of 0, 1 or 2 (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.020, respectively). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that an LEP score of 3 was significantly associated with the composite endpoint (P=0.030). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that risk of the composite of all-cause death and HF readmission was significantly higher in low LDL values (less than the cut-off values as calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) patients with statin use than in those without statin use (log rank P=0.002). LEP score, which comprehensively reflects extra-cardiac co-morbidities, is significantly associated with clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients.