Epidemiology Of Heart Failure Research Articles

Modern epidemiology of heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction in population-wide linked electronic health records: a study of 208815 heart failure patients in England

Abstract Background The modern epidemiology of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is yet to be studied on a population-wide scale in the United Kingdom, particularly in the post-COVID-19 era. Purpose To explore the post-pandemic epidemiology and outcomes of HFrEF and HFpEF in population-wide electronic health records (EHRs). Methods We accessed data in the National Health Service England’s Secure Data Environment for England via the British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium. We used EHRs for 57 million individuals to identify patients aged ≥18 years, of known sex, who were diagnosed with HF as the primary condition in any inpatient hospital stay from 01 Jan 2020 to 27 Feb 2023. By linking HF admissions with the National Heart Failure Audit, six other National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research audits, and the General Practice Extraction Service Data for Pandemic Planning and Research, we classified HF into HFrEF and HFpEF based on recorded left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≤40% and >40% respectively) or documented diagnosis. We compared characteristics of these groups and used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for key confounders, to examine differences in cause-specific mortality and hospitalisation outcomes. Results Over 3.2 years, we identified 208815 patients with a HF hospitalisation. 86110 (41%) patients had HFrEF, 65735 (31%) had HFpEF, and 56970 (27%) could not be categorised. Compared to patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF were older (mean [SD], 80.5 [10.9] vs 75.6 [13.6] years), more often female (n [%], 35990 [54.8] vs 30835 [35.8]), and less deprived (n [%] in the least-deprived Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019 quintile, 12275 [18.7] vs 15055 [17.5]; Table). Over a median follow-up of 11 months among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, 99740 patients were re-hospitalised (66%) and 71075 (47%) died. Risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular, and heart-failure re-hospitalisations were all higher in patients with HFpEF compared with patients with HFrEF (Figure). The risk of all-cause mortality was modestly higher in patients with HFpEF (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06; Figure). Risks of death due to cardiovascular disease overall, fatal myocardial infarction, and fatal HF were higher among patients with HFrEF. In contrast, risks of death due to non-cardiovascular causes were higher in patients with HFpEF. There were no differences in risk of death due to COVID-19. Conclusions Unlike previous epidemiological surveys of HF, patients with HFpEF appear to face worse prognosis and risk-adjusted disease trajectories compared with those with HFrEF after hospitalisation in this population-wide study. Excess mortality in HFpEF appears driven by higher risk of non-cardiovascular mortality. However, post-discharge survival is poor regardless of LVEF and represents an ongoing target for quality improvement efforts.

The effects of a dyadic empowerment-based heart failure management (De-HF) programme on self-care and HRQL : a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background The ever-growing epidemiology of heart failure (HF) and its detrimental impacts on patients’ quality of life and healthcare cost urge for effective interventions to ameliorate the modifiable prognostic factors. As substantial evidence suggests ineffective self-care as an important candidate especially for the post-discharge outcomes, various care approaches are developed to optimize this behavioral outcome. However, even family carers are heavily involved in the self-care process, dyadic approach to improve the health outcomes of both interactive partners are least applied in the HF transitional care model. Purpose To evaluate the effects of a dyadic empowerment-based heart failure management program (De-HF) on dyadic health and hospital service utilization outcomes. Methods This double-blind RCT randomized 88 HF patient-carer dyads to receive the De-HF program or a dialectic education program, after hospital discharge. Based on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management, the 16-week De-HF Program, comprising i) a dyadic assessment, ii) five online empowerment modules and iii) follow-up telecare, integrated explicit strategies (scenario-based training, teach-back and goal-setting) to actively engage the care dyads in collaborative disease management. Figure 1 is the graphical presentation of the De-HF Program. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life (HRQL) of the care dyads. Secondary outcomes include patients’ self-care as well as shared care and perceived control of the dyad. Results The mean age of the HF patients was 76.8 (9.4). The patients were in moderate disease severity [NYHA II/II: 56/44%; mean LVEF = 42.5%]. Figure 2 shows the consort flow diagram. After adjusting the socio-demographic characteristic, two-way analysis of covariance showed that patients in the De-HF program showed significantly greater improvement in patients’ self-care domains [Mean difference in change of score (95% CI): Self-care maintenance = 7.15 (1.82-12.46),Cohen’s d = 0.26, p=0.009; Self-care management = 10.04(3.29-16.79), Cohen’s d=0.65, p=0.004; symptom perception = 15.59 (8.20-22.98), Cohen’s d=0.928, p<0.001] and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score [Mean different in the change of score (95% CI) = -11.45 (-18.24 - -4.66). Cohen’s d = -0.742, p=0.001]. The patient-carer dyads also have significantly greater improvement in perceived control (p=0.001) and collaborative disease management in terms of joint decision-making (p=0.001) and sense of reciprocity (p=0.026). Conclusion Dyadic science has evolved in self-care research for HF. This trial provides the first evidence to inform the positive effects of a theory-based dyadic transitional care program in improving the collaborative self-care management in a family context and patient health outcome. Longer-term evaluation on the effects of De-HF program on health service utilization outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be followed.The De-HF Managment ProgramThe Consort Flow Diagram

Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

To review the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trends in cardiometabolic interventions. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction makes up approximately half of overall heart failure and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and overall burden on the healthcare system. It is a complex, heterogenous syndrome and clinical trials, to this point, have not revealed quite as many effective treatment options when compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, there is an expanding amount of data insight into the pathogenesis of this disease and the potential for newer therapies and management strategies. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction pathology has been found to be linked to abnormal energetics, myocyte hypertrophy, cell signaling, inflammation, ischemia, and fibrosis. These mechanisms also intricately overlap with the significant comorbidities often associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease. Treatment of this disease, therefore, should focus on the management and strict regulation of these comorbidities by pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means. In this review, a clinical update is provided reviewing the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trend in cardiometabolic interventions.

Epidemiology of paediatric chronic heart failure in Germany-A population-based analysis.

Paediatric chronic heart failure (CHF) is associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe paediatric CHF epidemiology in Germany. This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of anonymized healthcare claims data in the InGef database. This database includes longitudinal data from a representative sample of the German population of approximately 4.8 million insured members. We included individuals <18years from 2016 to 2021. CHF was defined by ≥2 diagnoses in different quarters of the year as inpatient or outpatient, using ICD-10-GM codes I50.- or P29.0. The number of eligible children in the database was 674462 in 2016 and 660692 in 2021. Prevalence of CHF per 100000 children was 20.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.3-24.3] in 2016 and 19.4 (95% CI, 16.2 to 23.0) in 2021. Incidence per 100000 children was 9.6 (95% CI, 7.4 to 12.3) in 2016 and 7.6 (95% CI, 5.6 to 10.0) in 2021 for newly diagnosed CHF. All-cause hospitalizations occurred in 47.3% to 57.7% of children with CHF per year. Up to 6.3% of children with CHF were hospitalized, coded primarily for heart failure. Mortality of children with CHF was <5 death per year in the studied population. In 128 children with CHF in 2021, the most common ICD-coded comorbidities were congenital malformations of cardiac septa (57.8%), atrial septal defect (44.5%), congenital malformations of the great arteries (43.0%) and ventricular septal defect (32.0%). Coded treatment modalities for paediatric CHF in 2021 included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (18.8%), beta-blockers (17.2%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (14.8%) and surgical procedures (13.3%). This representative cohort study reveals a relatively high incidence proportion. Approximately half of the children with CHF are hospitalized annually while mortality is low.

Clinical profile, treatment patterns and one-year outcome of heart failure patients admitted in tertiary care hospital of North India.

Because of wide heterogeneity in the epidemiology of heart failure among different populations, it is imperative to establish population-specific databases. To describe the clinical profile, treatment patterns, and outcomes of heart failure patients admitted to our tertiary care hospital. The study was a prospective observational study conducted over two years at our tertiary care hospital. It included patients admitted with acute and acute-on-chronic heart failure. We recruited 264 patients. Mean age of the study population was 57.8 ± 15.14 years. Males were 157 (59.5%). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most common cause followed by ischemic heart disease. Most common risk factors were hypertension, tobacco use, anemia, and diabetes. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was present in 154 (62%) patients. Acute de novo heart failure was present in 91 (34.5%) patients. The most common precipitant for heart failure exacerbation was infection, followed by ischemic causes and non-adherence to drugs. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7.5 ± 3.1 days. The in-hospital mortality was 8.7%, and cumulative six-month and one-year mortality was 23% and 28%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, renal failure, readmission, and not being on guideline-directed medical treatment were significant predictors of mortality. Our patients were younger, predominantly males, with dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy as commonest etiology. Hypertension and tobacco smoking were most common risk factors, with infections as most common precipitants. Only one-third of patients were on guideline-directed medical therapy. The one-year mortality was 28% and was higher in those without guideline-directed medical therapy.

Association of intravenous digoxin use in acute heart failure with rapid atrial fibrillation and short-term mortality according to patient age, renal function, and serum potassium.

Intravenous digoxin is still used in emergency departments (EDs) to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF), especially in those with rapid atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, many emergency physicians are reluctant to use intravenous digoxin in patients with advanced age, impaired renal function, and potassium disturbances due to its potential capacity to increase adverse outcomes. We investigated whether intravenous digoxin used to treat rapid atrial fibrillation in patients with AHF may influence mortality in patients with specific age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum potassium classes. A secondary analysis of patients included in in the Spanish EAHFE cohort, which includes patients diagnosed with AHF in the ED. 45 Spanish EDs. Two thousand one hundred ninety-four patients with AHF and rapid atrial fibrillation (heart rate ≥100 bpm) not receiving digoxin at home, divided according to whether they were or were not treated with intravenous digoxin in the ED. The relationships between age, eGFR, and potassium with 30-day mortality were investigated using restricted cubic spline (RCS) models adjusted for relevant patient and episode variables. The impact of digoxin use on such relationships was assessed by checking interaction. The median age of the patients was 82 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 76-87], 61.4% were women, 65.2% had previous episodes of atrial fibrillation, and the median heart rate at ED arrival was 120 bpm (IQR = 109-135). Digoxin and no digoxin groups were formed by 864 (39.4%) and 1330 (60.6%) patients, respectively. There were 191 deaths within the 30-day follow-up period (8.9%), with no differences between patients receiving or not receiving digoxin (8.5 vs. 9.1%, P = 0.636). Although analysis of RCS curves showed that death was associated with advanced age, worse renal function, and hypo- and hyperkalemia, use of intravenous digoxin did not interact with any of these relationships ( P = 0.156 for age, P = 0.156 for eGFR; P = 0.429 for potassium). The use of intravenous digoxin in the ED was not associated with significant changes in 30-day mortality, which was confirmed irrespective of patient age or the existence of renal dysfunction or serum potassium disturbances.

Rationale and design of the French Observatory of Acute Heart Failure (OFICA2)

BackgroundAcute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality – especially in patients aged≥65 years in high-income countries – and represents a high healthcare burden. In the past decade, the epidemiology and management of heart failure (HF) has changed, with the emergence of new medical and interventional therapeutics, but up-to-date real-life data are scarce. AimsThe main objectives are to describe baseline characteristics (with an emphasis on lifestyle, cognitive status, HF knowledge and treatment adherence), management, and in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of AHF patients in France. Secondary objectives are to investigate determinants of prognosis, modalities of treatment and follow-up, and identify gaps between guidelines and real-life management. MethodsOFICA2 is a prospective multicentre observational survey that enrolled 1513 patients hospitalized for AHF in 80 participating centres in France during March and April 2021. The diagnosis of AHF was made according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines definition. Inclusion criteria were age≥18years, health coverage and consent to participate. Detailed information was collected prospectively starting at admission. Thanks to direct linking with the French National Health Database, the anteriority up to 2years before inclusion, as well as a 3-year follow-up is specified for each patient and includes individual information on death, hospital admissions, major clinical events, drug delivery and use of reimbursed health resources. ConclusionThis cohort provides a representative snapshot on contemporary AHF, with a particular focus on self-care determinants, and will improve knowledge about AHF presentation, management and outcomes.

Advanced Heart Failure Characteristics and Outcomes in Women and Men.

The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differ in women and men. Whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients with advanced HF is not well defined. This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with advanced HF (European Society of Cardiology criteria) from 2007 to 2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks in women and men following advanced HF development were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen-Gill models, respectively. Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men (self-reported sex). Time from development of HF to advanced HF was similar in women and men (median 3.2 versus 3.6 years). Women were older at diagnosis (mean age 79 versus 75 years), less often had coronary disease and hyperlipidemia, but more often had hypertension and depression (P<0.05 for each). Advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction was more prevalent in women than men (60% versus 30%, p<0.001). There were no differences in adjusted risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77-1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.70-1.02]), all-cause hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.90-1.20]), or HF hospitalizations (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.75-1.11]) between women and men. However, adjusted cardiovascular mortality was lower in women versus men with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56-0.93]). Women more often present with advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction and men with atherosclerotic disease and advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction. Despite these differences, survival and hospitalization risks are largely comparable in women and men with advanced HF.

Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in Children and Adolescents With Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

With continued medical and surgical advancements, most children and adolescents with congenital heart disease are expected to survive to adulthood. Chronic heart failure is increasingly being recognized as a major contributor to ongoing morbidity and mortality in this population as it ages, and treatment strategies to prevent and treat heart failure in the pediatric population are needed. In addition to primary myocardial dysfunction, anatomical and pathophysiological abnormalities specific to various congenital heart disease lesions contribute to the development of heart failure and affect potential strategies commonly used to treat adult patients with heart failure. This scientific statement highlights the significant knowledge gaps in understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, staging, and outcomes of chronic heart failure in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease not amenable to catheter-based or surgical interventions. Efforts to harmonize the definitions, staging, follow-up, and approach to heart failure in children with congenital heart disease are critical to enable the conduct of rigorous scientific studies to advance our understanding of the actual burden of heart failure in this population and to allow the development of evidence-based heart failure therapies that can improve outcomes for this high-risk cohort.

Heart failure care in the Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic region: status, barriers, and routes to improvement.

Despite improvements over recent years, morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure (HF) are higher in countries in the Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic region than in Western Europe. With the goal of improving the standard of HF care and patient outcomes in the Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic region, this review aimed to identify the main barriers to optimal HF care and potential areas for improvement. This information was used to suggest methods to improve HF management and decrease the burden of HF in the region that can be implemented at the national and regional levels. We performed a literature search to collect information about HF epidemiology in 11 countries in the region (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Serbia, and Slovenia). The prevalence of HF in the region was 1.6-4.7%, and incidence was 3.1-6.0 per 1000person-years. Owing to the scarcity of published data on HF management in these countries, we also collected insights on local HF care and management practices via two surveys of 11 HF experts representing the 11 countries. Based on the combined results of the literature review and surveys, we created national HF care and management profiles for each country and developed a common patient pathway for HF for the region. We identified five main barriers to optimal HF care: (i) lack of epidemiological data, (ii) low awareness of HF, (iii) lack of national HF strategies, (iv) infrastructure and system gaps, and (v) poor access to novel HF treatments. To overcome these barriers, we propose the following routes to improvement: (i) establish regional and national prospective HF registries for the systematic collection of epidemiological data; (ii) establish education campaigns for the public, patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals; (iii) establish formal HF strategies to set clear and measurable policy goals and support budget planning; (iv) improve access to quality-of-care centres, multidisciplinary care teams, diagnostic tests, and telemedicine/telemonitoring; and (v) establish national treatment monitoring programmes to develop policies that ensure that adequate proportions of healthcare budgets are reserved for novel therapies. These routes to improvement represent a first step towards improving outcomes in patients with HF in the Central and Eastern Europe and Baltic region by decreasing disparities in HF care within the region and between the region and Western Europe.

Sex-related similarities and differences in responses to heart failure therapies.

Although sex-related differences in the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure are well known, investigations in the past decade have shed light on an often overlooked aspect of heart failure: the influence of sex on treatment response. Sex-related differences in anatomy, physiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and psychosocial factors might influence the response to pharmacological agents, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. In this Review, we discuss the similarities between men and women in their response to heart failure therapies, as well as the sex-related differences in treatment benefits, dose-response relationships, and tolerability and safety of guideline-directed medical therapy, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation. We provide insights into the unique challenges faced by men and women with heart failure, highlight potential avenues for tailored therapeutic approaches and call for sex-specific evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety in future research.

Heart Failure Statistics 2024 Update: A Report From the Korean Society of Heart Failure.

The number of people with heart failure (HF) is increasing worldwide, and the social burden is increasing as HF has high mortality and morbidity. We aimed to provide updated trends on the epidemiology of HF in Korea to shape future social measures against HF. We used the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service to determine the prevalence, incidence, hospitalization rate, mortality rate, comorbidities, in-hospital mortality, and healthcare cost of patients with HF from 2002 to 2020 in Korea. The prevalence of HF in the total Korean population rose from 0.77% in 2002 to 2.58% (1,326,886 people) in 2020. Although the age-standardized incidence of HF decreased over the past 18 years, the age-standardized prevalence increased. In 2020, the hospitalization rate for any cause in patients with HF was 1,166 per 100,000 persons, with a steady increase from 2002. In 2002, the HF mortality was 3.0 per 100,000 persons, which rose to 15.6 per 100,000 persons in 2020. While hospitalization rates and in-hospital mortality for patients with HF increased, the mortality rate for patients with HF did not (5.8% in 2020), and the one-year survival rate from the first diagnosis of HF improved. The total healthcare costs for patients with HF were approximately $2.4 billion in 2020, a 16-fold increase over the $0.15 billion in 2002. The study's results underscore the growing socioeconomic burden of HF in Korea, driven by an aging population and increasing HF prevalence.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of chronic right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC.

Right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation are common and strongly associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of heart failure hospitalizations and death. While medical therapy for right-sided heart failure is limited, treatment options for tricuspid regurgitation include surgery and, based on recent developments, several transcatheter interventions. However, the patients who might benefit from tricuspid valve interventions are yet unknown, as is the ideal time for these treatments given the paucity of clinical evidence. In this context, it is crucial to elucidate aetiology and pathophysiological mechanisms leading to right-sided heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation in order to recognize when tricuspid regurgitation is a mere bystander and when it can cause or contribute to heart failure progression. Notably, early identification of right heart failure and tricuspid regurgitation may be crucial and optimal management requires knowledge about the different mechanisms and causes, clinical course and presentation, as well as possible treatment options. The aim of this clinical consensus statement is to summarize current knowledge about epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment of tricuspid regurgitation in right-sided heart failure providing practical suggestions for patient identification and management.

Regional Differences in the Epidemiology of Heart Failure.

Heart failure (HF) epidemiology, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes exhibit substantial regional variations, reflecting diverse etiologies and health system capacities. This review comprehensively analyses these variations, drawing on data from recent global registries and clinical trials. Our review indicates that ischemic and hypertensive heart diseases are prevalent globally but differ in dominance depending on the region. Notably, regions such as Africa and Latin America show higher instances of HF from hypertensive heart disease and Chagas cardiomyopathy, respectively. Moreover, disparities in age and comorbidity profiles across regions highlight younger populations with HF in lower-income countries compared to older populations in high-income regions. This review also highlights the global disparity in guideline-directed medical and device therapy, underscoring significant underuse in lower-income regions. These insights emphasize the need for targeted HF management strategies considering regional clinical and demographic characteristics to enhance global HF care and outcomes.

Epidemiology of acute heart failure admissions in Iceland: phenotype distribution and prognostic implications

Abstract Background/Introduction Contemporary data that describe underlying causes of acute heart failure (AHF) epidemiology in a nation-wide unselected real-life cohort is lacking. Advances in diagnostics, including imaging and genetics, have facilitated the identification of the underlying cause of heart failure (HF). This is the first Icelandic nation-wide study on HF epidemiology of patients hospitalised for AHF. Purpose Investigate the underlying causes of AHF in Iceland and the patients‘ prognosis according to phenotypes. Methods This study used data from the Icelandic Heart Failure Registry (IHFR) and included all hospital admissions for AHF at Landspitali University Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 (n = 1723). Differences in survival between HF phenotypes were analysed using a multivariate log-rank test, both after diagnosis and after the first discharge. Results The study found that 39.8% of the cases had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 17.4% had HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), 40.3% had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 0.9% had HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), and 1.5% had unknown ejection fraction (EF). The average length of hospital admission varied by phenotype, ranging from 8.1 to 15.9 days. Women accounted for 41.15% of all admissions, with the most common phenotype amongst women being HFpEF (57.8%) and the least common being HFrEF (25.1%). The mean age at admission was 75.8 years. Roughly 79% of the whole cohort had NYHA class III-IV at admission; 33% of HFrEF, 13% of HFmrEF and 32% of HFpEF admissions. The most common underlying cause of AHF was coronary artery disease (CAD, 30.9%) followed by atrial fibrillation (15.0%), hypertension (9.8%), diastolic dysfunction (9.4%) and valvular heart disease (9.2%). Other more rare causes were dilated cardiomyopathy (4.4%), amyloidosis (3.2%), broken heart disease (1.5%), myocarditis (0.4%), postpartum cardiomyopathy (0.2%) and Fabry disease (0.1%). During the study period, 422 mortalities were recorded, with 106 in-hospital deaths. After excluding in-hospital mortalities, no significant difference in survival between phenotypes was observed after the first discharge. However, a significant difference in survival was observed with respect to the date of diagnosis (p = 0.0191). Conclusion This study provides new insights into the underlying causes of AHF and patients' prognosis according to phenotypes in Iceland. Our results demonstrate that the most common underlying cause of AHF was CAD, followed by atrial fibrillation and hypertension and that the cohort was highly symptomatic, with a large proportion of patients having NYHA class III-IV at admission. Our findings also highlight significant differences in the prevalence of HF phenotypes between genders, with women more commonly presenting with HFpEF and less commonly with HFrEF.

The global burden of heart failure: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Abstract Background Heart failure is a common reason for hospitalization and is associated with high health care costs and high symptom burden. Updated estimates of global and regional prevalence and underlying causes of HF may be helpful in guiding health policy and investment priorities. Purpose To provide comparable and consistent estimates of heart failure burden as part of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021. Methods We identified all available data on prevalence, incidence, and mortality for heart failure in the general population. Sources included published scientific literature, administrative records from national health systems, and vital registration data. We generated estimates of heart failure prevalence using DisMod-MR 2.1, a geospatial modelling software program. We then estimated the proportion of prevalent heart failure due to each of 27 underlying aetiologies to produce age-, sex-, location-, year-, and aetiology-specific estimates of heart failure burden. Results In 2021, there were 56.5 million (95% Uncertainty Interval (UI): 49.7 million to 63.7 million) prevalent cases of heart failure globally. There were 27.3 million (24.0 to 30.8) prevalent cases in females and 29.2 million (25.6 to 33.0) cases among males. Age-standardized prevalence increased from 647.9 (556.3 to 739.9) per 100,000 in 1990 to 682.7 (602.8 to 766.8) per 100,000 in 2021. The North Africa and Middle East super region had the highest age-standardized prevalence in 2021 (780.5 per 100,000 (658.7 to 907.6)) and South Asia had the lowest age-standardized prevalence (600.1 per 100,000 (526.5 to 671.4)). In 2021, Ischaemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, and other cardiomyopathy were responsible for the majority of prevalent heart failure cases worldwide, at 33.8% (28.4% to 38.3%), 22.6% (19.0% to 27.1%), and 8.2% (7.0% to 9.6%), respectively. Country specific estimates for both sexes combined in 2021 are shown in the map. Conclusion Heart failure is a highly prevalent condition, particularly in older age groups. As populations age and risk profiles change around the world, knowledge of the global epidemiology of heart failure will be critical in preventing or treating its underlying aetiologies in order to decrease its overall burden.Heart failure prevalence, 2021

Abstract 13971: Gender Differences in Advanced Heart Failure Characteristics and Outcomes

Introduction: The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) differs in women and men. However, it is not well defined whether these differences extend to the subgroup of patients that develop advanced HF or if they translate to differences in outcomes. Aim: To compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of advanced HF in women and men. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with advanced HF (as defined by European Society of Cardiology Criteria) from 2007-2017. Differences in survival and hospitalization risks following advanced HF development in women and men were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression and Andersen Gill models, respectively. Results: Of 936 individuals with advanced HF, 417 (44.6%) were women and 519 (55.4%) were men. Women were older (mean 79 vs 75 years) with a lower overall comorbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index 4.7 vs 5.2), less often had coronary artery disease (60% vs 79%) and hyperlipidemia (69% vs 77%), but more often had hypertension (91% vs 87%) and depression (32% vs 24%), and more often had advanced HF with preserved ejection fraction (60% vs. 30%) compared with men ( p&lt;0.05 for each). After adjustment for age, ejection fraction and comorbidities, there were no differences in risks of survival or hospitalizations ( Figure ) between women and men (p&gt; 0.10 for each). Conclusion: While advanced HF can occur in both women and men, their phenotypes differ; women more often present with advanced HFpEF and men with more atherosclerotic disease and advanced HFrEF. Despite these differences, survival is similar in women and men with advanced HF.

Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Canadian primary care.

Heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are largely managed in primary care, but their intersection in terms of disease burden, healthcare utilization, and treatment is ill-defined. We examined a retrospective cohort including all patients with HF or COPD in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network from 2010 to 2018. The population size in 2018 with HF, COPD, and HF with COPD was 15778, 27927, and 4768 patients, respectively. While disease incidence declined, age-sex-standardized prevalence per 100 population increased for HF alone from 2.33 to 3.63, COPD alone from 3.44 to 5.96, and COPD with HF from 12.70 to 15.67. Annual visit rates were high and stable around 8 for COPD alone but declined significantly over time for HF alone (9.3-8.1, P=0.04) or for patients with both conditions (14.3-11.9, P=0.006). For HF alone, cardiovascular visits were common (29.4%), while respiratory visits were infrequent (3.5%), with the majority of visits being non-cardiorespiratory. For COPD alone, respiratory and cardiovascular visits were common (16.4% and 11.3%) and the majority were again non-cardiorespiratory. For concurrent disease, 39.0% of visits were cardiorespiratory. The commonest non-cardiorespiratory visit reasons were non-specific symptoms or signs, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and mental health. In patients with HF with and without COPD, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor use was similar, while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use was marginally higher with concurrent COPD. Beta-blocker use was initially lower with concurrent COPD compared with HF alone (69.3% vs. 74.0%), but this progressively declined by 2018 (74.5% vs. 73.5%). The prevalence of HF and COPD continues to rise. Although patients with either or both conditions are high utilizers of primary care, the majority of visits relate to non-cardiorespiratory comorbidities. Medical therapy for HF was similar and the initially lower beta-blocker utilization disappeared over time.

Impacto pronóstico de metformina en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e insuficiencia cardiaca aguda. Análisis combinado de los registros EAHFE y RICA

IntroductionPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) have a worse prognosis despite therapeutic advances in both diseases. Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 and GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown cardiovascular benefits and have been positioned as the first step in the treatment of DM in patients with HF or high cardiovascular risk. However, in the pivotal trials the majority of patients receives concomitant treatment with metformin. Randomized clinical trials have not yet been developed to assess the prognostic impact of metformin at the cardiovascular level. Our objective was to analyze whether patients with DM and acute HF who receive treatment with metformin at the time of discharge may have had a better prognosis at one year of follow-up. MethodsProspective cohort trial using the combined analysis of the 2 main Spanish HF registries: the Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments registry –EAHFE– and the National Registry of Patients with Heart Failure –RICA–. Results33% (1453) of a total of 4403 patients with DM type 2 received treatment with metformin. This group presented significantly lower mortality after one year of treatment (22 vs. 32%; Log Rank test, p<0.001). In the adjusted analysis of mortality, patients receiving treatment with metformin had lower mortality at one year of follow-up regardless of the rest of the variables (RR 0.814; 95% CI: 0.712–0.930; p<0.01). ConclusionsPatients with DM type 2 and acute HF who received metformin had a better prognosis after one year of follow-up, so we believe that this drug should continue to be a fundamental pillar in the treatment of these patients.

Prognostic impact of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute heart failure: Combined analysis of the EAHFE and RICA registries

IntroductionPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) have a worse prognosis despite therapeutic advances in both diseases. Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 and GLP-1 receptor agonists have shown cardiovascular benefits and they have been positioned as the first step in the treatment of DM in patients with HF or high cardiovascular risk. However, in the pivotal trials the majority of patients receive concomitant treatment with metformin. Randomized clinical trials have not yet been developed to assess the prognostic impact of metformin at the cardiovascular level. Our objective has been centered in analyzing whether patients with DM and acute HF who receive treatment with metformin at the time of discharge may have a better prognosis at one year of follow-up. MethodsProspective cohort trial using the combined analysis of the two main Spanish HF registries, the EAHFE Registry (Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency Departments) and the RICA (National Registry of Patients with Heart Failure). Results33% (1453) of a total of 4403 patients with DM type 2 received treatment with metformin. This group presents significantly lower mortality after one year of treatment (22 versus 32%; Log Rank test P < 0.001). In the adjusted analysis of mortality, patients receiving treatment with metformin have lower mortality at one year of follow-up regardless of the rest of the variables (RR 0,814; 95%IC 0,712–0,930; P < 0.01). ConclusionsPatients with DM type 2 and acute HF who receive metformin have a better prognosis after one year of follow-up, so we believe that this drug should continue to be a fundamental pillar in the treatment of these patients.