Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers Research Articles

A Randomized, Single-Dose, Parallel-Controlled Phase 1 Clinical Comparison of an Omalizumab Biosimilar Candidate with Reference Omalizumab in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

This study evaluated the bioequivalence of omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against immunoglobulin-E (IgE), with one of its biosimilar candidates. The study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial. A total of subjects who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria were dynamically randomly assigned to receive the test drug or the reference drug with a single subcutaneous injection of 150mg by the minimization method. The test group and the reference group had similar demographic characteristics and baseline characteristics of total IgE. The 90% confidence interval of the geometric average ratio of the area under the serum concentration-time curve from the time 0 to the time of last quantifiable concentration, the area under the serum concentration curve from time 0 to infinity, and the maximum observed serum concentration between the 2 groups were within 80%-125%, showing bioequivalence. The changing trend of total and free IgE in the 2 groups was similar after administration, proving the pharmacodynamic similarity. The 2 groups had no significant difference in the positive rate of antidrug antibodies, and the total positive rate of neutralizing antibodies was 0. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups, with no serious adverse events. This study shows that the test drug had similar pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety to the reference omalizumab in healthy male subjects.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of LPM3480392 in two phase I clinical trials in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Drugs for acute postoperative pain and breakthrough cancer pain are still urgent on clinical. LPM3480392 is a G-protein-biased ligand at the μ-opioid receptor and showed potent analgesia in nonclinical studies. Two phase I studies of LPM3480392 were conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to explore its tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics under single ascending doses (Study I 0.1-3.0 mg, 30 min) and different infusion time (Study II, 0.6-1.0 mg, 2-15 min). There was one serious adverse event (AE) observed in Study II, and the rest AEs were mild or moderate in severity and resolved by the end of the study. Plasma LPM3480392 maximum concentration (Cmax ) (under lower infusion rate) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCs) were generally increased with dose. Moreover, LPM3480392 at dose of 0.6 mg under 2 min infusion rate elicited effective analgesia as the peak effect within 10-30 min, which measured by cold pain test and pupillometry. These findings suggest that LPM3480392 could be a potential treatment for acute pain management.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of PSD502 in Healthy Chinese Male and Female Volunteers: Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I Trials.

PSD502 is a metered-dose spray for premature ejaculation. The two trials aimed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of PSD502 in healthy Chinese male and female individuals. Two phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted in men (Trial 1) and women (Trial 2). The participants were randomized 3:1 to receive PSD502 (7.5 mg of lidocaine and 2.5 mg of prilocaine per spray) or a placebo. For male individuals, a single dose (three sprays) once daily was applied to the glans penis for 21 days except for nine sprays (three doses) on days 7 and 14, 4 h apart for each dose. For female individuals, two sprays were applied to the vagina and one to the cervix once daily for 7 days. The primary endpoint was safety. Pharmacokinetics analysis was also performed. Twenty-four male and 24 female individuals were recruited. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.9% (7/18) of male individuals and 66.7% (12/18) of female individuals in the PSD502 group, respectively. Both trials reported 50.0% (3/6) treatment-emergent adverse events for the placebo. No grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, or treatment-emergent adverse events leading to early withdrawal or discontinuation occurred. After consecutive applications, lidocaine and prilocaine cleared rapidly in both trials. Plasma concentrations exhibited high inter-individual variability. The maximum plasma concentrations of active ingredients were far below the anticipated minimum toxic concentrations. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of metabolites were ≤ 20% of the parent drugs. No clinically significant accumulations were observed in the two trials. PSD502 was well tolerated and showed low plasma concentrations in healthy Chinese male and female individuals.

Potential pharmacokinetic interactions in fixed-dose combinations of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine compared with perindopril/indapamide and amlodipine in healthy Chinese volunteers

S05590 is a fixed-dose combination of perindopril tert-butylamine 4 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg, and S06593 is a fixed-dose combination of perindopril arginine 5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg/amlodipine 5 mg. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pharmacokinetic interactions exist among the components of S06593, compared with S05590 and amlodipine as reference drugs, in healthy Chinese male volunteers after a single oral administration under fasting conditions. A single-center, open-label, randomized, three-period, six-way crossover study was conducted. A total of 42 participants were enrolled and randomized to receive S05590 plus amlodipine, or S06593. The doses of perindopril were 3.34 mg in both S05590 and S06593, calculated as free acid. Blood samples were collected in each treatment period to determine the plasma concentrations of perindopril, indapamide and amlodipine, as well as perindoprilat, the main metabolite of perindopril. A total of 39 participants completed this study. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-tand AUC0-∞for perindopril, perindoprilat, indapamide and amlodipine were all within 80.00–125.00%, thus indicating that S05590 plus amlodipine and S06593 were pharmacokinetically equivalent. During the study, only one serious emergent adverse event was reported, which was deemed not to be associated with the study drug. No serious treatment-associated adverse events were observed.

Effect of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer on the pharmacokinetics of senaparib (IMP4297) in healthy volunteers: A drug-drug interaction study.

A phase I open-label study assessed the effect of multiple oral doses of a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetic profile of a single oral dose of senaparib, a novel, highly potent poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor and CYP3A4 substrate, in Chinese healthy male volunteers (HMV). Adult HMV were enrolled to the itraconazole or rifampicin group (n = 16 each). In Period 1, all participants received a single oral dose of senaparib 40 mg (itraconazole group) or 100 mg (rifampicin group). In Period 2, the same dose was coadministered with itraconazole (200 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg), respectively. The primary endpoints were senaparib exposure parameters. Coadministration with itraconazole significantly increased exposure of senaparib and decreased that of its major metabolites M9 and M14. Maximum plasma senaparib concentration (Cmax ) was increased by ~79% and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by ~2.8-fold. Coadministration with rifampicin significantly reduced the Cmax and AUC of senaparib by ~59 and 83%, respectively. The Cmax for both M9 and M14 was slightly increased, although AUC was decreased. All treatment-emergent adverse events were grade ≤2, regardless of the treatment administered. In Chinese HMV, the exposure of senaparib was significantly increased when coadministered with itraconazole and significantly decreased when coadministered with rifampicin. It is recommended to avoid concomitant use of senaparib and strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4.

How to Achieve Sufficient Endogenous Insulin Suppression in Euglycemic Clamps Assessing the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Long-Acting Insulin Preparations Employing Healthy Volunteers.

The therapeutic effect of basal insulin analogs will be sustained at a rather low insulin level. When employing healthy volunteers to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of long-acting insulin preparations by euglycemic clamp techniques, endogenous insulin cannot be ignored and sufficient endogenous insulin inhibition is crucial for the PD and/or PK assessment. This study aimed to explore a way to sufficiently inhibit endogenous insulin secretion. Healthy Chinese male and female volunteers were enrolled. After a subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine (IGlar) (LY2963016 or Lantus) (0.5 IU/kg), they underwent a manual euglycemic clamp for up to 24 h where the target blood glucose (BG) was set as 0.28 mmol/L below the individual’s baseline. Blood samples were collected for analysis of PK/PD and C-peptide. The subjects fell into two groups according to the reduction extent of postdose C-peptide from baseline. After matching for the dosage proportion of Lantus, there were 52 subjects in group A (C-peptide reduction<50%) and 26 in group B (C-peptide reduction≥50%), respectively. No significant difference was detected in age, body mass index, the proportion of Latus treatment and female participants. A lower basal BG was observed in group B compared to group A (4.35 ± 0.26 vs. 4.59 ± 0.22 mmol/L, p < 0.05). The clamp studies were all conducted with high quality (where BG was consistently maintained around the target and exhibited a low variety). The binary logistic regression analysis indicated low basal BG as an independent factor for the success of sufficient endogenous insulin suppression. In conclusion, setting a lower sub-baseline target BG (e.g., 10% instead of 5% below baseline) might be an approach to help achieve sufficient endogenous insulin suppression in euglycemic clamps with higher basal BG levels (e.g., beyond 4.60 mmol/L).

Pharmacokinetics, mass balance, and metabolism of [14C]TPN171, a novel PDE5 inhibitor, in humans for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

TPN171 is a novel phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and erectile dysfunction (ED), which currently is undergoing phase II clinical trials in China. In this single-center, single-dose, nonrandomized, and open design study, radiolabeled [14C]TPN171 was used to investigate the metabolic mechanism, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and clearance pathways of TPN171 in 6 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Each volunteer was administered a single oral suspension of 10 mg (100 μCi) of [14C]TPN171. We found that TPN171 was absorbed rapidly in humans with a peak time (Tmax) of 0.667 h and a half-life (t1/2) of approximately 9.89 h in plasma. Excretion of radiopharmaceutical-related components was collected 216 h after administration, accounting for 95.21% of the dose (46.61% in urine and 48.60% in feces). TPN171 underwent extensive metabolism in humans. Twenty-two metabolites were detected in human plasma, urine, and feces using a radioactive detector combined with a high-resolution mass spectrometer. According to radiochromatograms, a glucuronide metabolite of O-dealkylated TPN171 exceeded 10% of the total drug-related components in human plasma. However, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, no further tests are needed to evaluate the safety of this metabolite because it is a phase II metabolite, but the compound is still worthy of attention. The main metabolic biotransformation of TPN171 was mono-oxidation (hydroxylation and N-oxidation), dehydrogenation, N-dealkylation, O-dealkylation, amide hydrolysis, glucuronidation, and acetylation. Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) mainly catalyzed the formation of metabolites, and CYP2E1 and CYP2D6 were involved in the oxidative metabolism of TPN171 to a lesser extent. According to the incubation data, M1 was mainly metabolized to M1G by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9), followed by UGT1A7 and UGT1A10.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Single and Multiple Ascending Oral Doses of Youkenafil Hydrochloride, a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

Youkenafil hydrochloride is a novel selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated in healthy Chinese male volunteers. In addition, this study explored the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters of youkenafil hydrochloride. The study was divided into 3 trials: a single ascending dose (25, 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg youkenafil), multiple dose (50, 100, or 150 mg youkenafil once daily for 7 consecutive days), and food effect (50 mg youkenafil single dose). The overall tolerability of youkenafil was good. Youkenafil was rapidly absorbed after a single oral dose. Food intake impeded absorption efficiency but had no significant effect on area under the plasma concentration-time curve values. The mean accumulation ratio in area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration ranged from 1.3 to 1.6 and from 1.2 to 1.4 after once-daily dosing. There was no apparent accumulation following consecutive administration for 7 days. Less than 1% of the dose was found in urine as the intact drug for all dose groups. Single-dose youkenafil up to 200 mg and multiple doses up to 150 mg were generally safe and well tolerated.

The impact of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of fuzuloparib in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

This clinical study was conducted to evaluate the impact of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of fuzuloparib. In this single-centre, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study, healthy male subjects took a single 50 mg dose of fuzuloparib on two separate occasions: the first was on Day 1 as monotherapy, and the second was on Day 12 after oral administration of rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 8days. Series of blood samples were obtained before and after fuzuloparib administration at different time points: pre-dose, and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. All samples were examined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were estimated by using a non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety was assessed by monitoring for changes in vital signs and laboratory tests, physical examinations, and incidences of adverse events (AEs). A total of 16 Chinese male subjects were enrolled. Of these, 16 and 15 cases were evaluable for PK analysis following administration with fuzuloparib alone and pretreatment with rifampicin, respectively. Pretreatment with rifampicin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the systemic exposure to fuzuloparib. The treatment ratio and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 0.10 (0.095-0.115) and 0.32 (0.281-0.365), respectively. A single administration of fuzuloparib after multiple oral dosing of rifampicin was well-tolerated, without severe AEs. The exposure of fuzuloparib was dramatically decreased when pretreated with rifampicin. Strong CYP3A4 inducers should be avoided during fuzuloparib treatment.

Reduction in C-Peptide Levels and Influence on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Preparations: How to Conduct a High-Quality Euglycemic Clamp Study

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the different extent of inhibition of endogenous insulin secretion by the reduction of C-peptide levels in an euglycemic clamp study and its effects on the evaluation of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics of insulin preparations, and quality of clamp study to determine the best reduction range of C-peptide levels. Methods: Healthy Chinese male volunteers were enrolled and underwent a single-dose euglycemic clamp test. Participants were subcutaneously injected with long-acting insulin glargine (0.4 IU/kg). Blood samples were collected pretest and up to 24 h post-test to assess pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and C-peptide levels. Results: We divided the 39 volunteers enrolled in the study into three groups according to the reduction of C-peptide levels: group A (ratio of C-peptide reduction <30%, n = 13), group B (ratio of C-peptide reduction between ≥ 30% and <50%, n = 15), and group C (ratio of C-peptide reduction ≥50%, n = 11); there were significant differences in the three groups (p = 0.000). The upper and lower limits of blood glucose oscillation in group C was statistically lower than the other groups, the range of oscillating glucose levels in group C was −17.0 ± 6.6% to −1.1 ± 6.7%. The AUC0–24 h in groups A, B, and C were 9.7 ± 2.2, 11.0 ± 2.9, and 11.9 ± 2.1 ng/ml × min, respectively, which indicated an increasing trend in the three groups (P trend = 0.041). For quality assessment, the average glucose (p = 0.000) and MEFTG (p = 0.001) levels in three groups were significantly different. Conclusion: The different extent of inhibition of endogenous insulin will influence the PK/PD of insulin preparations and the quality of the euglycemic clamp. Furthermore, the ratio of C-peptide reduction should be above 50% to free from the interference of endogenous insulin, and the range of blood glucose levels should be consistently maintained at −10% to 0 in the euglycemic clamp.

Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of fuzuloparib: an open-label, crossover study in Chinese healthy male volunteers.

Fuzuloparib (AiRuiYiTM, formerly fluzoparib, SHR3162) is a new orally active poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. It has multiple pharmacological activities in breast, ovarian, and prostatic cancer. Fuzuloparib is mainly metabolized through the enzyme CYP3A4 may slow fuzuloparib metabolism and increase its concentrations in blood. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fuzuloparib by fluconazole, which is a broad antifungal agent and a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4. In this study, the effects of CYP3A4 inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of fuzuloparib were assessed in a total of 20 healthy Chinese male subjects in an open-label, two-period, single-sequence, crossover study. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including the maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable area under concentration (AUC0-t), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), were increased by 32.4%, 104.5%, and 109.6%, with corresponding 90% confidence intervals of (23-43%), (93-116%), and (98-122%), respectively, when fluconazole was combined with fuzuloparib compared to fuzuloparib alone. There was also a slight increase in the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events, including hyperlipidemia and elevated aspartate transaminase. The fuzuloparib is 150mg b.i.d in clinics use. Our results suggest that fuzuloparib could well be tolerated when administered as a single 20mg oral dose alone or co-administered with 400mg fluconazole in healthy male subjects. It is recommended to avoid using moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors together with fuzuloparib or instead of 50mg when necessary.

Quantification of flupirtine and its active metabolite D-13223 in human plasma by LC-MS/MS: application to a clinical trial of flupirtine maleate capsules in healthy male Chinese volunteers

Quantification of flupirtine and its active metabolite D-13223 in human plasma by LC-MS/MS: application to a clinical trial of flupirtine maleate capsules in healthy male Chinese volunteers

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the new prolonged-release leuprorelin acetate microspheres for injection compared with Enantone® in healthy Chinese male volunteers

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the new prolonged-release leuprorelin acetate microspheres for injection (3.75 mg) with the reference product Enantone® (3.75 mg). Method 48 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomly received a single 3.75 mg dose of the test drug or Enantone®. Results There were no significant differences in Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-48 between the test group and reference group (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals of the two groups were 87.49%~112.74%, 97.15%~154.25%, and 80.85%~109.01%, respectively. Twenty-eight days after administration, both groups reached 100.0% castration level; there was no difference in the time from administration to reaching castration level between the two groups (P > 0.05); However, the difference between the two groups in the duration of castration level was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no major or serious adverse events, and the severity was mild to moderate. Conclusion The pharmacokinetic characteristics of leuprorelin in two groups were consistent. The two groups exhibited similar inhibitory effects on testosterone and more subjects in the test group maintained a longer castration time than those in the reference group.

Effects of Food on the Pharmacokinetic Properties and Mass Balance of Henagliflozin in Healthy Male Volunteers

PurposeHenagliflozin is a highly selective and effective sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to investigate the effects of meal intake on the pharmacokinetic properties of henagliflozin, and to understand the excretion pathways of henagliflozin in humans. MethodsIn this Phase I, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period crossover study, 12 healthy male Chinese volunteers were randomized to receive either henagliflozin 10 mg in the fasted condition followed by henagliflozin 10 mg in the fed condition, or the reverse schedule, with the two administrations separated by a washout period of at least 7 days. Samples of blood, urine, and feces were collected and analyzed for the investigation of the pharmacokinetic profile and excretion pathways in the fasted and fed conditions. Any adverse events that occurred throughout the study were recorded for tolerability assessment. FindingsAfter the administration of a single oral dose of henagliflozin, mean (SD) plasma AUC0–∞ and Cmax were 1200 (274) h · ng/mL and 179 (48.8) ng/mL, respectively, in the fasted state and were decreased to 971 (245) h · ng/mL and 115 (34.2) ng/mL in the fed state. The fed/fasted ratios (90% CIs) of the geometric mean values of Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ were 64% (54%–76%), 80% (76%–85%), and 80% (76%–85%), respectively. The median (range) Tmax was prolonged from 1.5 (1–3) hours in the fasted condition to 2 (1.5–6) hours in the fed condition. Mass-balance testing revealed that henagliflozin was eliminated primarily as the parent drug in feces and as glucuronide metabolites in urine. In the fasted state, the cumulative excretion percentages of the parent drug and its metabolites to dose in feces and urine were 40.6% and 33.9%, respectively. The values in the fed condition were changed to 50.4% and 25.5%, respectively. These findings suggest that postprandial administration decreases the absorption rate and the extent of henagliflozin exposure in humans, but has no effect on the metabolism or elimination of the drug. ImplicationsIn the present study, the consumption of a high-fat meal prior to henagliflozin administration was associated with reductions in AUC0–∞ and Cmax of 19.4% and 36.4%, respectively. However, based on the analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic findings on henagliflozin, this slight change may not have clinical significance. Mass balance of henagliflozin in humans was achieved with ∼75% of the administered dose recovered in excretions within 4 days after administration whether in the fasted or fed state. These findings suggest that henagliflozin tablets can be administered with or without food.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, two-way, parallel phase I clinical study comparing the pharmacokinetics and safety of adalimumab injecta and Humira® in healthy Chinese male volunteers

ABSTRACT Background Humira® is a fully humanized anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody that has been marketed and approved in the United States for the clinical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis and other immune-mediated diseases. This study compared the bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety of adalimumab injecta (a biosimilar of Humira® produced by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd) and Humira® in healthy Chinese male subjects in a phase I clinical study. Methods Healthy Chinese male subjects (N = 164) were randomly given a subcutaneous injection of 40 mg adalimumab or Humira® at a 1:1 ratio. Plasma drug concentrations were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were statistically analyzed. To evaluate drug immunogenicity, anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels were detected. To evaluate the safety of the drugs, the subjects’ physical indicators, such as multiple vital signs and routine blood tests, were continuously monitored. Results The similarity ratios of adalimumab and Humira® PK parameters were all within 80%-125%, meeting the bioequivalence standards. Drug-induced ADA and nAb levels were similar, and the drug safety in subjects was also similar. Conclusions All study drugs showed similar bioequivalence, immunogenicity and safety. Clinical trial registration CTR20182070 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry)

A phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX04 to reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States, the European Union, and China in healthy Chinese male volunteers

PurposeTo compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety and immunogenicity of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar HLX04 with reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males.MethodsIn this double-blind Phase 1 study, healthy volunteers (N = 208) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a single 3 mg/kg intravenous infusion of HLX04 or reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States (bevacizumab-US), the European Union (bevacizumab-EU) or China (bevacizumab-CN). Co-primary endpoints were area under the serum concentration–time profile (AUC) from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–inf) and from zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUClast). Secondary endpoint was the maximum serum drug concentration (Cmax). Study participants were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and samples were collected for anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing throughout the study.ResultsPharmacokinetic parameters were similar across groups. The respective geometric least-squares mean ratios (GLSMR) of AUC0–inf, AUClast and Cmax were: 95.7%, 96.0% and 101.8% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-US; 94.3%, 94.6% and 100.5% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-EU; and 90.0%, 90.4% and 98.2% for HLX04 versus bevacizumab-CN. For all test-to-reference comparisons, two-sided 90% confidence intervals of GLSMR for AUC0–inf, AUClast and Cmax fell in the pre-specified bioequivalence range (80–125%). There were no notable differences in the frequency, nature and/or grade of TEAEs. No deaths were reported and no ADAs were detected during the study.ConclusionHLX04 had similar safety and pharmacokinetic profiles to reference bevacizumab in healthy Chinese males, supporting the confirmatory Phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety equivalence between HLX04 and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT03511963).Clinical trial registrationThe study was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03483649.

Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity and Safety Study for SHR-1309 Injection and Perjeta® in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers.

Objectives: Pertuzumab is a monoclonal antibody for the treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety of the test preparation SHR-1309 injecta and the reference preparation Perjeta® in healthy Chinese male subjects. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, single dose, two-way, parallel bioequivalence trial, a total of 80 qualified Chinese male subjects were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Each subject was intravenously injected with SHR-1309 or Perjeta®. Blood samples were collected at 21 different time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, immunogenicity was assessed at five different time points. The safety of the medication was monitored throughout the whole trial. Results: Cmax and AUC0-t were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters. Under a 90% confidence interval, their geometric mean ratios were 98.30 and 88.41% for SHR-1309 injection and Perjeta®, respectively. The geometric mean ratio of secondary pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-∞ was 88.58%. These evaluation indexes are in the standard range of 80–125%, so SHR-1309 can be considered bioequivalent to Perjeta®. After 1,680 h (day 70) of administration, the two groups had 12 and 13 subjects who produced antidrug antibody (ADA), respectively. The occurrence time and proportion of ADA in SHR-1309 and Perjeta® were similar between subjects, and they had similar immunogenicity. During the entire trial period, there were 71 drug-related adverse reactions in 29 subjects who received SHR-1309 and 61 drug-related adverse reactions in 32 subjects who received Perjeta®. The incidence of adverse reactions between the two drugs was similar. Conclusion: The pharmacokinetic parameters, immunogenicity and safety of the biosimilar SHR-1309 injection produced by Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. were similar to the original drug Perjeta® produced by Roche Pharma AG. The two drugs met the bioequivalence evaluation criteria. Therefore, SHR-1309 is bioequivalent to Perjeta®. Clinical trial registration: CTR20200,738.

Interindividual Variability in the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Recombinant Human Insulin and Insulin Aspart

PurposeThe present study compared the interindividual variability in the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a short-acting recombinant human insulin to those of insulin aspart through manual euglycemic glucose clamp tests. MethodsSixty healthy Chinese male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive human insulin or insulin aspart, administered via SC injection (0.2 U/kg). For the evaluation of interindividual variability in PD and PK properties (glucose infusion rate [GIR], insulin concentration [INS]) through euglycemic clamp studies, %CVs were calculated, and PK/PD interindividual variability was compared between the 2 groups. Findings: The differences between the human insulin and insulin aspart groups in interindividual variabilities in total AUCs of the GIR (19% vs 21%) and INS (14% vs 17%) were not significant. The interindividual variabilities in AUCgir0–120min, early Tmax50%, and AUCins0–120min were lower in the insulin aspart group than in the human insulin group (22% vs 44%, 21% vs 35%, and 22% vs 28%, respectively; all, P ˂ 0.05), while the interindividual variabilities in the AUCs of GIR120–600min and INS120–600min were higher with insulin aspart than with human insulin (29% vs 20%, 51% vs 30%; both, P ˂ 0.05). ImplicationsThe overall interindividual variability with insulin aspart was similar to that with recombinant human insulin. Yet insulin concentration and metabolic effect during the declining period were more variable with insulin aspart compared to human insulin in these healthy male subjects.

A randomized Phase I pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar trastuzumab (SIBP-01) with the reference product (Herceptin®) in healthy Chinese male volunteers

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of the biosimilar trastuzumab (SIBP-01) compared to Herceptin®. Methods In this Phase I randomized double-blind parallel-group trial, 100 healthy male volunteers were randomized in a1:1 ratio to receive a single 6 mg•kg–1 intravenous dose of SIBP-01 or Herceptin®. Serum concentrationswere analyzed using a validated ELISA. Results The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUCinf between the trial group and the reference group were 93.55%-104.27%, 91.98%-102.35% and 91.88%-102.34%, respectively; the geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of AUC0-t and AUCinf in the sensitivity analysis were 92.29%-102.63% and 91.81%-102.16%, respectively. These values were within the prespecified equivalence margins, establishing the bioequivalence of SIBP-1 and Herceptin®. AEs were similar across all subjects in the SIBP-01 and Herceptin® arms, with treatment-related AEs reported by 72.00% and 80.00%, respectively. In each group, there was one AE that caused a subject to discontinue the study. Expert opinion Trastuzumab (Herceptin®) is significantly more effective than chemotherapy in reducing exacerbations and tumor cell growth, and its adverse events are far lower than chemotherapy. Herceptin®is very expensive for most patients in China. The protein molecular primary structure of the biosimilar trastuzumab (SIBP-01) is consistent with Herceptin®, with highly similar high level structure, biologocal activity and purity.But there are few studies comparing the bioequivalence of SIBP-01 and Herceptin® in healthy subjects and cancer patients 2. Conclusions This study showed the PK similarity of SIBP-01 to Herceptin®. SIBP-01 was safe and well tolerated in healthy male volunteers, with no significant differences from the reference drug in safety or immunogenicity 4.

Application of HPLC method using normal phase column in a comparative pharmacokinetic study of two sulpiride tablet formulations

An HPLC method using normal phase column eluted with an aqueous solvent and detected by fluorescence was applied to analyze sulpiride concentrations in plasma samples obtained from a comparative pharmacokinetic study. This comparative study was conducted to determine the bioequivalence of two tablet products (Dogmatyl and Sulpin) containing sulpiride on 12 normal healthy Chinese male volunteers in a single-dose, two-period, two-sequence, two-treatment crossover design. The pharmacokinetic parameters, AUC 0-last, AUC 0-inf, and C max, were calculated from plasma data and compared using the SAS General Linear Model computer program. A two one-sided t distribution test was also performed, as well as the 90% confidence interval method, to determine the mean difference of these three pharmacokinetic parameters. The results suggest that these two sulpiride tablet products are bioequivalent when orally administered in a 400 mg single dose of two tablets.