Health Care Access Barriers Research Articles

Bridging the Gap: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Address Barriers in Migrant Mental Health Care Access

Despite their higher risk of mental health conditions, migrants often face barriers to accessing mental health care. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence on interventions to improve mental health care access for migrants (protocol CRD42024556575). PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for experimental and observational studies on this topic. A narrative summary and a meta-analysis of the study findings are presented, along with a GRADE quality assessment. Eighteen reports, accounting for 3285 migrants, were included in the final selection. There were six randomized controlled trials, nine non-randomized clinical trials, and three observational studies. The interventions consisted of psychoeducation (27.8%), digital tools (22.2%), outreach programs, counseling, peer support (each 11.1%), and miscellaneous approaches (16.7%). There was marked heterogeneity in the intervention structure and outcome measure across the studies. Nevertheless, all studies reported a positive effect of the interventions on mental health care access. Still limited by few studies providing data suitable for the pooled estimate, the meta-analyses found a significant effect in reducing stigma and improving mental health literacy. Overall, this review identified promising interventions for improving migrant mental health care access. Future research is needed to validate interventions that can be applied sustainably across different contexts and migrant populations.

Examining healthcare access with physical vs. telehealth options: Promise and peril for socially vulnerable older adults

IntroductionThis paper seeks to understand barriers to healthcare access faced by socially vulnerable older adults in Chicago using qualitative analysis. As the U.S. population ages, ease of healthcare access by older adults grows in importance. Yet, current literature lacks an examination of pain points and coping strategies in accessing healthcare, specifically by socially vulnerable older adults. This is especially relevant as virtual telehealth access and transportation options that shape healthcare access evolve rapidly. MethodsIn this work, we conduct three listening sessions with 40 total participants to understand the lived experiences of Black and Latino older adults living in low-income areas of Chicago. Transcript data was analyzed using qualitative concept and emotion coding to identify vulnerabilities that older patients face in accessing care. ResultsThis work highlights five key takeaways from the qualitative analysis: 1) technology struggles and prospects in accessing healthcare, 2) social resources for coping give rise to tension between dependence and autonomy, 3) system disconnects (medical-pharmacy-transportation) represent key pain points, 4) different means of accessing healthcare (traditional transportation vs. telehealth) are value and emotion ladened, 5) different means of observing lead to new methodological insights. ConclusionOvercoming healthcare access barriers for older adults ultimately requires analysis of specific interfaces between infrastructure, healthcare, and communications systems. Solutions should prioritize the autonomy of older adults by offering physical accessibility and customized technology. The three intervention policies recommended in this paper include: health kiosks implementation, digital access classes, and specialized training for transit drivers and medical staff.

Community mental health for migrant women in Barcelona (“Self-Care Among Women”): Protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot psychological intervention

IntroductionMigrant populations, especially women, are often more susceptible to poor mental health and they face healthcare access barriers. This study aims to develop and evaluate a community-based mental health intervention through a participative research process to promote mental health and prevent psychiatric disorders among migrant women in Barcelona city. The intervention is built upon two evidence-based guidelines: Group Problem Management Plus (Group PM+) and Self-Help Plus (SH+). Methods“Self-Care Among Women” is a mixed-methods process evaluation study for the development of a community-based psychological pilot intervention. A participatory approach will be employed to adapt the content agenda of the community mental health intervention. Process indicators on context, implementation and mechanisms of change will be assessed through an intersectionality lens to explore the way in which the intervention is developed and implemented. The contextual fit, acceptability and feasibility of the proposed psychological intervention will be examined through participants' and facilitators' perceptions of the intervention. Further, women's clinical mental health condition and wellbeing will be assessed before and after the intervention, through standardized and culturally-validated instruments. Ethics and disseminationEthical approval of the research protocol has been obtained by the Research Ethics Committees of Hospital Clínic, Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol) and Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu. Written informed consent will be requested from all research participants for inclusion in the study. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to congresses.

Talking About Incarceration History: Engaging Patients and Healthcare Providers in Communication.

Incarcerated individuals in carceral facilities demonstrate an elevated prevalence of chronic disease conditions which are likely to persist post-release. Healthcare providers may not be trained on how exposure to incarceration may influence patient health outcomes and patient-provider communication. To examine the self-perceived preparedness of healthcare providers to interview patients regarding history of incarceration and the potential related health consequences. This cross-sectional study consisted of a web-based self-administered questionnaire distributed via email to a random sample of healthcare providers in the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital. In total, 400 healthcare providers were invited to participate; 114 respondents completed the survey, of which 26% were medical doctors (n=30), 41% were physician assistants (n=47), and 32% were nurse practitioners (n=37). Understanding healthcare provider training in caring for formerly incarcerated patients, current treatment practices and confidence caring for patients who have experienced incarceration, and implications for clinical care. Of 114 respondents, 73% reported that they currently care for formerly incarcerated patients. However, only 8% received specialized training for the care of formerly incarcerated patients. While most respondents did not ask their patients about prior history of incarceration (81%), when asked about comfortability in doing so, 60% reported low levels of comfort. Most providers (77%) reported high agreement that incarceration impacted health, with 54% reporting that it led to significant healthcare access barriers, but 64% reported low confidence levels in addressing the needs of formerly incarcerated patients. Healthcare workers recognized incarceration as a detrimental health exposure. However, providers reported low levels of confidence in understanding and addressing the unique needs of patients who experienced incarceration. Findings support the need for further training regarding how to address the needs of formerly incarcerated patients, which would support efforts towards achieving equitable healthcare.

The need for biopsychosocial menopause care: a narrative review.

Menopause is a reproductive transition affecting half the world's population. Stigma and limited availability of evidence-based treatments that support biopsychosocial well-being mean that this life stage is often associated with challenging symptoms and reduced quality of life (QoL). The aim of this review was to examine the extent literature on psychological and mind-body interventions to manage perimenopausal and postmenopausal symptoms, and apply an interdisciplinary clinical, research, and cultural knowledge framework to guide recommendations for improving QoL and healthy aging in this population. We also aimed to understand the ideal delivery mode for such interventions. Using Scopus, Medline, and PubMed, a review of systematic reviews, guidelines, and randomized controlled trials was undertaken to examine the use of psychological and mind-body interventions to improve menopause-related QoL and symptoms, including hot flushes, depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain, and sleep; conclusions were based on an analysis of this available evidence and linked to clinical and cultural considerations. Empirical support exists for a number of psychological and mind-body approaches to support QoL and symptoms during the menopause transition. The literature also identifies the need for menopause care that is culturally responsive.An online multimodal model of menopause care is thus recommended, incorporating evidence-based treatments (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy, yoga, hypnosis) and treatment techniques (eg, mindfulness, and education including nutrition support), as well as First Nations wisdom. We also recommend financial well-being approaches to support people undergoing menopause. Integrated, multimodal approaches should be available online to remove time, location, and healthcare access barriers, and be designed with diverse consumers to ensure equity for those underserved due to region, LGBTIQ+ assigned female at birth status, and for multicultural and First Nations people.

Health Catch-UP!: a realist evaluation of an innovative multi-disease screening and vaccination tool in UK primary care for at-risk migrant patients

BackgroundMigrants to the UK face disproportionate risk of infections, non-communicable diseases, and under-immunisation compounded by healthcare access barriers. Current UK migrant screening strategies are unstandardised with poor implementation and low uptake. Health Catch-UP! is a collaboratively produced digital clinical decision support system that applies current guidelines (UKHSA and NICE) to provide primary care professionals with individualised multi-disease screening (7 infectious diseases/blood-borne viruses, 3 chronic parasitic infections, 3 non-communicable disease or risk factors) and catch-up vaccination prompts for migrant patients.MethodsWe carried out a mixed-methods process evaluation of Health Catch-UP! in two urban primary healthcare practices to integrate Health Catch-UP! into the electronic health record system of primary care, using the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention evaluation. We collected quantitative data (demographics, patients screened, disease detection and catch-up vaccination rates) and qualitative participant interviews to explore acceptability and feasibility.ResultsNinety-nine migrants were assessed by Health Catch-UP! across two sites (S1, S2). 96.0% (n = 97) had complete demographics coding with Asia 31.3% (n = 31) and Africa 25.2% (n = 25), the most common continents of birth (S1 n = 92 [48.9% female (n = 44); mean age 60.6 years (SD 14.26)]; and S2 n = 7 [85.7% male (n = 6); mean age 39.4 years (SD16.97)]. 61.6% (n = 61) of participants were eligible for screening for at least one condition and uptake of screening was high 86.9% (n = 53). Twelve new conditions were identified (12.1% of study population) including hepatitis C (n = 1), hypercholesteraemia (n = 6), pre-diabetes (n = 4), and diabetes (n = 1). Health Catch-UP! identified that 100% (n = 99) of patients had no immunisations recorded; however, subsequent catch-up vaccination uptake was poor (2.0%, n = 1). Qualitative data supported acceptability and feasibility of Health Catch-UP! from staff and patient perspectives, and recommended Health Catch-UP! integration into routine care (e.g. NHS health checks) with an implementation package including staff and patient support materials, standardised care pathways (screening and catch-up vaccination, laboratory, and management), and financial incentivisation.ConclusionsClinical Decision Support Systems like Health Catch-UP! can improve disease detection and implementation of screening guidance for migrant patients but require robust testing, resourcing, and an effective implementation package to support both patients and staff.

Joint effect of tobacco and meat on cardiovascular disease and treatment adherence in Indian Women

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death for both men and women in India. But it is often overlooked in women. Tobacco and meat consumption are common risk factors for CVD. While individual studies have explored the link between tobacco or meat consumption and CVD, their joint effect remained understudied. Methods The study analyzed data from the National Family Health Survey 2019-21, of 711431 women aged 15 to 49 in India. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the risk of individual and joint effects of tobacco and meat consumptions on self-reported CVD prevalence. Age, BMI, education, wealth index, residency, region, religion, and alcohol were used as covariates. Additionally, interactions model was assessed. Lastly, treatment adherence for CVD was studied, considering treatment behavior, insurance, and healthcare access barriers. Results Cardiovascular disease prevalence was 0.72%. The risk of CVD was higher among the smokers [aOR: 2.26(1.83-2.73)] than smokeless tobacco [aOR: 1.34(1.21-1.49)] consumers. In contrast daily meat consumers showed higher risk [aOR: 1.23(1.03-1.47)] than meat non-consumers. Women who were consumers of both tobacco and meat had risk of [aOR: 1.15 (1.02 - 1.30)] CVD compared to who did not consume both tobacco and meat. Interaction was not detected between tobacco and meat consumption. CVD treatment adherence was higher among the women who possess an insurance [OR: 1.11(1.04-1.19)]. The risk of treatment non-adherence was higher among women who were aged below 40 with no education and from the poorest section of the society. Barriers for accessing health care facilities were solo attendance, provider availability, and drug access. Conclusions Tobacco and meat both need to be addressed to control CVD among women. Empowering women and bringing them under government insurance with an improve health care system are crucial. Key messages • The joint effect of tobacco and meat consumption increased the risk of cardiovascular diseases among women. However, there was no interaction effects observed between tobacco and meat consumption. • Healthcare facilities needs to be improved and awareness among young adults are extremely crucial for better CVD treatment management among women in India.

Employers and the Privatization of Public Health

This Article focuses on the role of employers in public health and argues that they constitute increasingly important actors in the U.S. public health arena. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, a series of judicial decisions and newly enacted statutes enfeebled the public health powers of the federal and state governments. In a 2023 statement, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch clearly articulated his antagonism toward government-initiated COVID-19 interventions, describing them as “the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country.” All too many share his views. Employers may be highly motivated to safeguard their workers’ health. Without healthy staff members, they cannot keep their doors open, and without visible pandemic protections, they cannot reassure concerned customers that their premises are safe. During COVID-19, many employers established mask, testing, social distancing, and vaccine rules even in the absence of government mandates. Employers’ profit motives do not diminish their contributions to public health. Their contributions can significantly reduce health disparities by protecting vulnerable individuals who otherwise face health care access barriers and economic challenges that exacerbate their risks. This Article posits that in future public health emergencies, the United States will increasingly rely on those with a financial stake in individuals’ health. Federal and state government authorities should therefore embrace employers as public health partners. To that end, this Article develops recommendations concerning guidance and funding support that should be available to assist employers in their emergency response efforts.

Medical imaging utilization in migrants compared with nonmigrants in a universal healthcare system: A population-based matched cohort study.

Medical imaging is an integral part of healthcare. Globalization has resulted in increased mobilization of migrants to new host nations. The association between migration status and utilization of medical imaging is unknown. A retrospective population-based matched cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada from April 1, 1995 to December 31, 2016. A total of 1,848,222 migrants were matched 1:1 to nonmigrants in the year of migration on age, sex, and geography. Utilization of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiography, and ultrasonography was determined. Rate differences per 1,000 person-years comparing migrants to nonmigrants were calculated. Relative rates were calculated using a recurrent event framework, adjusting for age, sex, and time-varying socioeconomic status, comorbidity score, and access to a primary care provider. Estimates were stratified by migration age: children and adolescents (≤19 years), young adults (20 to 39), adults (40 to 59), and older adults (≥60). Utilization rates of CT, MRI, and radiography were lower for migrants across all age groups compared with Ontario nonmigrants. Increasing age at migration was associated with larger differences in utilization rates. Older adult migrants had the largest gap in imaging utilization. The longer the time since migration, the larger the gap in medical imaging use. In multivariable analysis, the relative rate of imaging was approximately 20% to 30% lower for migrants: ranging from 0.77 to 0.88 for CT and 0.72 to 0.80 for MRI imaging across age groups. Radiography relative rates ranged from 0.84 to 0.90. All migrant age groups, except older adults, had higher rates of ultrasonography. The indication for imaging was not captured, thus it was not possible to determine if the imaging was necessary. Migrants utilized less CT, MRI, and radiography but more ultrasonography. Older adult migrants used the least amount of imaging compared with nonmigrants. Future research should evaluate whether lower utilization is due to barriers in healthcare access or health-seeking behaviors within a universal healthcare system.

An exploratory study of resettled Rohingya refugees: Healthcare access and preventive cancer screenings.

Research suggests that preventive healthcare needs are high among U.S. refugees from Myanmar; yet no studies have examined healthcare patterns among U.S. Rohingya refugees. We examined participation in preventive cancer screening, healthcare access barriers, and facilitators in a community-based sample of 308 Rohingya refugees in Chicago, Illinois. Descriptives were conducted for the participation rates to preventive cancer screenings, indicated by age and gender. Chi-square tests were used to examine gender differences in barriers and facilitators in healthcare. Participants reported low participation in preventive screenings (e.g. 89.2% never received a Papanicolaou (pap) test). Healthcare access barriers were observed: 82.8% uninsured, 81.2% not knowing where to go for healthcare needs, and 55.1% needed interpretation, with men less likely to have had a doctor's visit in the past year or a regular provider. Findings highlight the urgent need to further develop or tailor interventions to address the healthcare needs for resettled Rohingya refugees.

Healthcare Access for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: A Survey by the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.

A prior survey disseminated in 2017 identified that healthcare access barriers exist and significantly affect patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to identify, through an updated survey, the healthcare access barriers that patients continue to face, with a focus on socioeconomic factors and patient awareness of resources to navigate existing barriers. A 52-question online survey evaluating (1) access to healthcare professionals, medications, and procedures; (2) associated financial challenges; and (3) patient awareness of education and advocacy tools to navigate IBD care barriers, was disseminated through multiple channels to IBD patients and their caregivers. Of the 2281 completed responses, patients on advanced specialty medications, younger than 65 years of age, or on employer insurance experienced significantly greater issues with insurance barriers to accessing medications and coverage of medically necessary tests/treatments. Patients who live in areas of concentrated poverty were more likely to experience poor health outcomes when subjected to step therapy compared to patients who did not. Additionally, patients were more likely to experience one or more financial barriers or trade-offs if the patient used an advanced specialty medicine or lived in an area with concentrated poverty. While there have been significant and numerous advancements in IBD treatments, patients with IBD continue to experience barriers to healthcare access and treatment and financial struggles. Ongoing awareness and advocacy efforts focused on healthcare system reform and related policies to further minimize care disparities and barriers remain vital.

Access to primary healthcare services among adults with disabilities in Brazil.

To investigate perspectives of people with disabilities in Brazil regarding the access to primary healthcare. In-depth interviews were conducted with 44 individuals with disabilities in Pernambuco, Distrito Federal, and São Paulo between March 2020 and November 2021. These interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed thematically, using the Levesque framework to identify healthcare access barriers. Participants expressed a solid understanding of their healthcare needs and existing obstacles. However, individuals with hearing and visual impairments experience challenges because of communication barriers. In Pernambuco, the Community Health Agent was often the initial point of contact for primary care services. Public transportation lacked accessibility, from buses to driver attitudes, posing difficulties for people with disabilities. More accessible transportation and improved urban infrastructure could enhance service access. High medication costs were reported due to limited healthcare unit availability. Communication accessibility issues, inadequate audio-visual resources and equipment were also identified as barriers. Attitudinal barriers among healthcare professionals and subpar home visit services further hinder access. To address these challenges and improve the well-being of individuals with disabilities in Brazil, comprehensive action is essential. This includes leadership, governance, and resource allocation reforms to meet healthcare needs. Initiatives like disability-focused training for service providers, enhanced transportation options, improved information accessibility, and increased support from community healthcare workers can collectively enhance the lives of people with disabilities.

Access to health and rights of children in street situations and working children: a scoping review

BackgroundStreet and working children (SWC) and young people (YP) are highly vulnerable to violence, exploitation, hazardous environments and human rights violations. While the UN Committee on the Rights of the...

Abstract B156: Exploring identity-specific stressors among Black women with a family history of cancer

Abstract Background: Compared to women of other racial/ethnic groups, Black women are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive subtypes of breast cancer (including triple-negative breast cancer), diagnosed at younger ages, diagnosed at more advanced stages, and have higher mortality rates and poorer survival outcomes. Black women also experience higher rates of breast cancer recurrence, which further exacerbates the survival disparities. These disparities are influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and social factors, including chronic stress and discrimination. Understanding identity-specific stressors will help identify potential risk factors impacting breast cancer outcomes among Black women.Objective: This study aims to identify common stressors among Black women aged 18 to 49 with a family history of cancer, exploring potential links to breast health risk. Methods: We conducted a grounded theory study, including qualitative interviews from Black women in the Augusta, Georgia, area (N=47) discussing life as a Black woman and sources of stress. Participants with a close family history of cancer (defined as having at least one first- or second-degree relative diagnosed with cancer) were selected for this analysis (n=22). We applied the Sort & Sift, Think & Shift method for analysis. Results: We identified three categories in response to the research question, including healthcare access barriers and medical invalidation (particularly in rural communities), intergenerational trauma, and Strong Black Woman persona (characterized by independence, emotional suppression, and a tendency to care for others while neglecting their own needs). Participants described these categories in reference to themselves and their female family members with cancer. Participants reported stress related to jobs and caregiving responsibilities, lack of adequate social support, lack of time and finances necessary for self-care, and racial discrimination in medical settings. Conclusion: The identified stressors highlight the complex interplay between familial cancer history and daily stress experiences among Black women. These findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to mitigate stress and potentially reduce breast cancer risk. Further research is warranted to explore these themes in relation to breast cancer outcomes. Citation Format: Samantha R. Jones, Debbynie Barsh, Kathleen McIntyre, Christy J.W. Ledford. Exploring identity-specific stressors among Black women with a family history of cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B156.

Evaluation of the Veterans Health Administration's Digital Divide Consult for Tablet Distribution and Telehealth Adoption: Cohort Study.

Video telehealth offers a mechanism to help Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients overcome health care access barriers; however, many veterans lack a suitable device and sufficient internet connectivity. To address disparities in technology access, VHA established a Connected Device Program that offers veterans loaned video-capable tablets and internet service. In 2020, VHA introduced a national Digital Divide Consult to facilitate and standardize referrals for this resource. We sought to evaluate the reach and impact of VHA's Connected Device Program, leveraging Digital Divide Consult data to determine whether resources are supporting veterans with health care needs and access barriers. We examined the reach of VHA's Connected Device Program using national secondary data from VHA's electronic health records among 119,926 tablet recipients who received a tablet (April 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023) and 683,219 veterans from the general VHA population. We assessed changes in tablet recipients' demographic and clinical characteristics before and after implementation of the Digital Divide Consult compared with the general VHA population. We examined the impact of tablets and the consult on adoption of telehealth (ie, video visit use and number of visits) adjusting for differences between tablet recipients and the general VHA population. Finally, we evaluated consult implementation by assessing the use of video-based services by tablet referral reason. Common reasons for tablet referral included mental health diagnoses (50,367/79,230, 63.9%), distance from a VHA facility >30 miles (17,228/79,230, 21.7%), and social isolation (16,161/79,230, 20.4%). Moreover, 63.0% (49,925/79,230) of individuals who received a tablet after implementation of the Digital Divide Consult had a video visit in the first 6 months of tablet receipt. Some consult reasons were associated with a higher-than-average percentage of video telehealth use, including enrollment in evidence-based mental health programs (74.8% [830/1100] with video use), living >30 miles from a VHA facility (68.3% [10,557/17,228] with video use), and having a mental health diagnosis (68.1% [34,301/50,367] with video use). Tablet recipients had nearly 3 times the likelihood of having a video visit within a month once provided a tablet compared to the general VHA population, with an adjusted risk ratio of 2.95 (95% CI 2.91-2.99) before consult implementation and 2.73 (95% CI 2.70-2.76) after consult implementation. Analyses of telehealth adoption suggested that veterans receiving tablets for mental health care and evidence-based programs have higher rates of video visits, while those who are homebound or receiving tablets for hospice have higher rates of nonuse. This evaluation of VHA's Connected Device Program suggests that tablets are facilitating video-based care among veterans with complex needs. Standardization of referrals through the Digital Divide Consult has created opportunities to identify groups of tablet recipients with lower telehealth adoption rates who might benefit from a targeted intervention.

Unmasking the complexities of healthcare access in low-resource settings: a health systems approach to obstetric and under-5 healthcare in rural settings of Eastern Uganda

ABSTRACT Background Access to appropriate obstetric and under-5 healthcare services in low-resource settings is a challenge in countries with high mortality rates. However, the interplay of multiple factors within an ecological system affects the effectiveness of the health system in reaching those in need. Objective This study examined how multiple factors concurrently affect access to obstetric and child healthcare services in resource-poor settings Methods The research used social autopsies [in-depth interview] with mothers who experienced newborn death [n = 29], focus group discussions [n = 8] with mothers [n = 32], and fathers [n = 28] of children aged 6–59 months, and the author’s field observations in Eastern Uganda’s rural settings. The research employed narrative and inductive thematic analysis, guided by concepts of social interactions, behaviour, and health institutional systems drawn from system theory. Results The study unmasked multiple concurrent barriers to healthcare access at distinct levels. Within families, the influence of mothers-in-law and gender dynamics constrains women’s healthcare-seeking autonomy and agency. At the community level, poor transport system, characterised by long distances and challenging road conditions, consistently impede healthcare access. At the facility level, attitudes, responsiveness, and service delivery of health workers critically affect healthcare access. Negative experiences at health facilities profoundly discourage the community from seeking future health services. Conclusion The findings emphasise the persistent influence of structural and social factors that, although well documented, are often overlooked and continue to limit women’s agency and autonomy in healthcare access. Enhancing universal access to appropriate healthcare services requires comprehensive health systems interventions that concurrently address the healthcare access barriers.

Health Care Access Among Children in Latinx Families Across U.S. Destinations

Latinx children now live in a wider array of U.S. geographic areas than in the past, including both established and new areas of Latinx settlement. This geographic heterogeneity could be consequential for Latinx children’s health care access, with prior research suggesting increased health access barriers for Latinx children in new versus established areas of settlement. Merging public-use county-level data with restricted individual-level health data from the National Health Interview Survey (2010–2014), we quantitatively examine how three health access indicators—health insurance coverage, delayed care, and usual place of care—differ among children (ages 4–17) in Latinx immigrant, Latinx U.S.-born, White U.S.-born, and Black U.S.-born families (n = 89,994) across established, fast-growing hub, new, and minor Latinx destination counties. We also examine the potential roles of local immigrant hostilities and health care resources in contributing to health access differences across destinations. In fully adjusted models, children in new destinations are less likely to have health insurance than peers in established destinations, and this disparity is even wider for Latinx children of immigrants. Adjusted model results also show that children in new destinations are more likely to have delayed care than those in established destinations, and children in these four groups in new destinations, fast-growing hubs, and minor destinations are more likely to have no usual place of care than peers in established destinations. Our results are consistent with prior work suggesting that more health care access barriers exist for children, particularly Latinx children of immigrants, in new versus established Latinx destinations.

Overview of Tuberculosis: Causes, Symptoms and Risk Factors

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health threat, exacerbated by factors such as drug resistance, co-infections, and social determinants of health. This comprehensive review examines various aspects of TB, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and control measures. The bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes TB and primarily affects the lungs, although it can also affect other organs. Risk factors for TB include poverty, malnutrition, overcrowded living conditions, and immunocompromised states such as HIV/AIDS. Symptoms of TB include cough, fever, weight loss, and night sweats, but can vary depending on the site of infection. Diagnosis typically involves clinical evaluation, imaging studies, and microbiological testing, with rapid molecular tests such as the Xpert MTB/RIF assay revolutionizing TB diagnostics. Treatment consists of multidrug therapy for six to nine months, with drug-resistant TB requiring longer and more complex regimens. Prevention and control efforts focus on early case detection, treatment adherence, infection control measures, and Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine vaccination. TB research and innovation aim to develop new diagnostics, drugs, and vaccines to improve TB control and treatment outcomes. Challenges to TB control include stigma, healthcare access barriers, and the rise of drug-resistant TB strains. Collaboration and advocacy efforts are essential for addressing TB in special populations, high-risk settings, and co-infection scenarios. Integrating a One Health approach, harnessing technology, and addressing climate change impacts is critical for advancing TB control efforts and achieving the goal of ending the global TB epidemic.

Healthcare-Seeking Behavior of Coastal Women in Bangladesh

Background: Healthcare seeking behavior encompasses actions taken by individuals who perceive themselves to be ill in an attempt to find appropriate remedies. For women, particularly in regions like coastal Bangladesh, socio-cultural and economic barriers often impede their ability to access and utilize healthcare services effectively. Understanding these behaviors is crucial for developing strategies to improve healthcare access and utilization. Objective: To assess the healthcare-seeking behavior of coastal women in Bangladesh, evaluating the quality of services provided and identifying barriers to effective healthcare utilization. Method: This descriptive, community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June 1, 2019, to August 31, 2019, in three randomly selected villages in coastal Bangladesh. A sample of 200 women aged 20 years and above was surveyed using a pre-designed, semi-structured questionnaire. The study analyzed sociodemographic data and healthcare-seeking behavior, including preferences for healthcare practices and decision-making autonomy. Results: The study revealed that 35% of participants had inhibitions about discussing health issues with family members, and 42% required family permission to access healthcare services. Conversely, 65.5% were able to make their own healthcare decisions. Regarding first-choice healthcare practices, 60.5% preferred visiting qualified medical practitioners, while 19.5% consulted Registered Medical Practitioners (RMPs), and 15.5% relied on home remedies. Notably, married women (71.6%) were more likely to make their own healthcare decisions compared to unmarried (53.2%) and widowed (68.2%) women. Literate women showed greater awareness of available health centers (80.6%) compared to illiterate women (56.7%). Conclusion: The findings underscore significant barriers in healthcare access among coastal women, including the need for family permission and reliance on non-qualified practitioners. Socioeconomic ......

Perceptions of multi-cancer early detection tests among communities facing barriers to health care.

Marginalized racial and ethnic groups and rural and lower income communities experience significant cancer inequities. Blood-based multi-cancer early detection tests (MCEDs) provide a simple and less invasive method to screen for multiple cancers at a single access point and may be an important strategy to reduce cancer inequities. In this qualitative study, we explored barriers and facilitators to MCED adoption among communities facing health care access barriers in Alaska, California, and Oregon. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze general barriers to cancer screening, MCED-specific barriers, facilitators of MCED adoption, and MCED communication strategies. We found barriers and facilitators to MCED adoption across 4 levels of the social-ecological model: (1) individual, (2) interpersonal, (3) health care system, and (4) societal. These included adverse psychological impacts, positive perceptions of MCEDs, information and knowledge about cancer screening, the quality of the patient-provider relationship, a lack of health care system trustworthiness, logistical accessibility, patient supports, and financial accessibility. Optimal MCED communication strategies included information spread through the medical environment and the community. These findings underscore the importance of understanding and addressing the multilevel factors that may influence MCED adoption among communities facing health care access barriers to advance health equity.